Up Next
Charlie Kirk Debates Gender Roles and Patriarchy with College Student at Arizona State University Campus
15:37
Charlie Kirk Delivers Powerful Message to Gen Z at Republican National Convention on American Dream
5:40
Baby Charlie Kirk Debating the Definition of Woman and American Values
8:24
Related Books
Browse Conservative Books
Charlie Kirk Debates Feminist Tilly Middlehurst on Women's Roles, Happiness, and the Crisis of Western Fertility Decline
Charlie Kirk engages in a heated exchange with Tilly Middlehurst, a feminist student at a university event, challenging modern feminist ideology and its impact on women's wellbeing. The debate covers fundamental questions about biological sex, the measurable decline in women's happiness since the 1960s, and the correlation between marriage, motherhood, and life satisfaction. Kirk argues that feminism has led women away from their natural inclinations toward family, resulting in plummeting fertility rates, increased suicide rates, and widespread unhappiness. The student counters with arguments about systemic oppression, economic inequality, and the need for structural support. The conversation touches on religious fundamentalism, immigration, and competing moral frameworks, culminating in Kirk's assertion that societies failing to reproduce inevitably decline.
Defining Womanhood in the Modern Age
The debate began with a seemingly simple question that revealed deep philosophical divides. When asked to define what a woman is, the feminist student provided a definition that combined biological reality with social experience, stating that a woman is "an adult human female" but also emphasizing the social construction of gender. Charlie Kirk pressed the issue with a direct question: can a woman have a prostate? The student's response—that people with prostates are biologically male but can be socially treated as women—highlighted the central tension between biological fact and social theory that characterizes modern gender debates.
This exchange set the stage for a broader conversation about whether biological differences between men and women should be acknowledged and respected, or whether they should be viewed primarily as social constructs open to redefinition. Kirk argued for recognizing inherent biological differences, while the student maintained that gender is partially a social phenomenon that varies across cultures and contexts.
The Happiness Crisis Among Western Women
Kirk shifted the conversation to what he identified as a measurable decline in women's happiness over the past four decades. He challenged the student to explain why women report more stress and dissatisfaction despite gains in legal rights and professional opportunities. The feminist student argued that women's unhappiness stems not from feminism itself, but from dual pressures to excel professionally while still bearing the burden of domestic labor based on outdated expectations.
The student pointed to data showing that women's life expectancy, education levels, and professional achievements have risen in countries with higher gender equality, arguing that what appears as unhappiness is actually visibility—women are now free to express dissatisfaction rather than being silenced with prescriptions for Valium as they were in the 1950s. Kirk countered by pointing to rising suicide rates among women, asking why, if feminism has been so beneficial, material outcomes show increasing desperation.
Feminism's Track Record: Fertility, Marriage, and Wellbeing
Kirk identified feminism as the primary variable that changed in the 1960s, correlating its rise with declining fertility rates, decreasing marriage rates, and increasing unhappiness among women. He argued that feminist ideology from figures like Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem told women they were trapped in domestic life and should instead pursue careers, freeze their eggs, and take birth control. The result, Kirk contended, has been a generation of deeply unhappy women who suppressed their biological inclinations.
He made a provocative observation: the happiest women in the West are those who are married with children, particularly those with multiple children. Kirk argued that raising children represents something far more meaningful than becoming a CEO or banker, providing women with purpose that extends beyond their own lifetime. The student acknowledged various factors contributing to decreased happiness, including income inequality, housing costs that don't match wage growth, and monopolistic interference in politics, but maintained that these economic factors offer more compelling explanations than increased freedoms.
The Methodology Debate: Can Happiness Be Measured?
The conversation took an interesting turn when the student questioned whether happiness is even a valid metric, pointing out that Kirk himself doesn't believe gay people should simply pursue happiness but should make other moralistic considerations. The student argued that self-reported happiness studies are fundamentally flawed, using the example that someone stressed about university exams might report being extremely miserable, as might a Palestinian child in a war zone, despite vastly different circumstances.
Kirk countered with a striking comparison: women in subsaharan Africa, despite having far fewer material advantages than Western women, report higher happiness levels. He attributed this to two factors that African women possess but Western women often lack: belief in the divine and children. Meanwhile, Western women have "cats and good jobs" but report widespread misery. This observation, Kirk argued, points to a biological undercurrent that feminism has ignored—that many women fundamentally want marriage and children, and denying this truth leads to unhappiness.
Finding Common Ground on Religious Fundamentalism
An unexpected moment of agreement emerged when the conversation turned to Islam's treatment of women. Both Kirk and the student agreed that Islam mistreats women, with Kirk citing female genital mutilation as an example. This led Kirk to argue that Muslim immigration to the UK should be stopped, a position the student initially seemed to support before pivoting to claim that "all religious fundamentalism is bad," including evangelical Christianity.
Kirk challenged this equivalence, asking the student to name a single Christian country that mistreats women. When the student answered "America," Kirk pointed to concrete examples refuting this claim: a female vice president, a female Speaker of the House, and the fact that women in America earn more than men in many demographics. The student attempted to use Rwanda's high female government representation as a counterpoint, but couldn't identify whether Rwanda was even Islamic, undermining the comparison.
The Path Forward: Supporting Families or Expanding Autonomy?
The student proposed structural solutions including universal childcare and shared legally enforceable parental leave, pointing to Nordic countries where women have high workforce participation alongside state support and report higher life satisfaction than in more conservative countries including America. Kirk found some agreement here, noting that Turning Point USA provides six months of paid leave when employees have children and expressing support for family-friendly policies like Hungary's child policy.
Both agreed that the West needs to encourage having more children, though they arrived at this conclusion from different premises. Kirk argued it's necessary because societies that fail to reproduce their populations face civilizational decline and must import the third world, eventually becoming the third world themselves. The student seemed to view family support more as a matter of fairness and worker rights rather than demographic necessity.
Competing Moral Frameworks
The debate concluded with a philosophical question about moral authority. The student argued that aspects of womanhood can be divided between biological (anatomy) and social (nurturing tendencies), while Kirk would likely place nurturing in the biological category. The student asked why Kirk's moral framework, which prioritizes birth rates, should take precedence over other value systems, especially given Kirk's professed belief in free markets and personal freedom.
Kirk's response revealed his fundamental position: he believes in absolute truth claims. It is absolutely wrong and bad when a society stops having children to replace its population, leading to third-world immigration and cultural transformation. This assertion of objective moral truth versus the student's framework of competing value systems represents the unbridgeable divide in the conversation—one rooted in transcendent truth claims, the other in pragmatic pluralism.
Video Transcript
[00:00] We're honored to be partnering with the
[00:01] Allen Jackson Ministries and today I
[00:02] want to point you to their podcast. It's
[00:04] called Culture and Christianity, the
[00:06] Allen Jackson Podcast. What makes it
[00:08] unique is Pastor Allen's biblical
[00:10] perspective. He takes the truth from the
[00:12] Bible and applies it to issues that
[00:13] we're facing today. Gender confusion,
[00:15] abortion, immigration, Doge, Trump, and
[00:17] the White House, issues in the church.
[00:19] He doesn't just discuss the problems. In
[00:21] every episode, he gives practical things
[00:23] we can do to make a difference. His
[00:25] guests have incredible expertise and
[00:27] powerful testimonies. Each episode will
[00:29] make you recognize the power of your
[00:30] faith and how God can use your life to
[00:33] impact our world today. The Culture and
[00:35] Christianity podcast is informative and
[00:37] encouraging. You could find it on
[00:39] YouTube, Spotify, or wherever you get
[00:40] your podcasts. Be sure to subscribe so
[00:42] you don't miss any episodes. Alan
[00:44] Jackson Ministries is working hard to
[00:45] bring biblical truth back into our
[00:47] culture. You can find the Culture and
[00:49] Christianity podcast, sermons, and other
[00:50] thoughtprovoking teachings on our pastor
[00:52] Allan's YouTube channel, AllenJack
[00:55] Ministries.
[01:07] So I'm a feminist. Um my question uh is
[01:11] about the role of women though. What
[01:12] should women's role in public and
[01:14] private life look like and what are the
[01:15] material benefits of that? Well, thank
[01:18] you uh for that. Can can I take it I I
[01:20] don't even want to take this detour, but
[01:22] can we both agree on what a woman is?
[01:23] Yes. Um an adult human female. It's a
[01:26] biological state of being that is also
[01:27] socially experienced. Can I please
[01:28] elucidate just one example of that
[01:30] social experience? Yeah, I was going to
[01:32] answer your question, but sure. Go
[01:33] ahead. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Okay. So, let's
[01:34] say you're a member of a tribe and that
[01:36] in that tribe to uh you have the
[01:38] biological female anatomy and in order
[01:40] to become a woman in that tribe, you
[01:41] have to also get a tattoo. That's a
[01:43] social experience that's mapped on to
[01:44] biological reality. So, can can a woman
[01:47] have a prostate? Can a woman have a
[01:49] prostate? Biologically speaking, a woman
[01:51] is an adult human female that has a
[01:53] biological reality, but it's also social
[01:56] experience, right? So, I like I don't
[01:58] It's super easy. Like, can a woman have
[01:59] a prostate? So, as per my definition of
[02:02] woman, I would say that people who have
[02:04] a prostate are biologically male, but
[02:06] they can sometimes be socially treated
[02:07] as women. Okay. Got it. So, so, so, so
[02:10] women can have prostates. Got it. Okay.
[02:12] Um, that's So, you're a feminist that
[02:15] actually isn't just fighting for women,
[02:17] you're also fighting for men. So yes,
[02:20] yeah, men also experience harms from uh
[02:22] patriarchy. But I argue, we're talking
[02:23] about the same feminism though, just
[02:24] make sure. Yeah, sure. Go ahead. So men
[02:26] also experience harm from patriarchal
[02:28] domination, but I would argue that those
[02:29] harms come from that system of
[02:30] domination itself. In the same way, for
[02:32] example, this isn't a threat, but if I
[02:34] reached across and punched you in the
[02:35] face, then my hand might hurt, right? So
[02:37] are we understanding that there are do
[02:39] like patterns of power? So I would also
[02:41] fight for the rights of men as a
[02:42] feminist just as I would fight for the
[02:44] rights of women. Sure. Um, do you think
[02:46] women are happier than they were 40
[02:47] years ago? Um, I think I would have a
[02:50] few responses to that. Um, I think that
[02:52] women report more stress and
[02:54] dissatisfaction today because, uh, not
[02:56] because they have more rights or because
[02:57] of feminism, but because they're under
[02:59] dual pressure to both excel
[03:00] professionally and also because of the
[03:03] domestic labor in homes that is
[03:04] structured around outdated expectations.
[03:06] So for example, studies like the OECD's
[03:08] better life index show that women's life
[03:11] expectancy, education levels,
[03:12] professional achievements have risen in
[03:14] countries with higher gender inequality.
[03:15] So I would argue that what you're
[03:17] calling unhappiness is actually
[03:19] visibility because now we hear women
[03:20] expressing dissatisfaction whereas in
[03:22] the 50s we prescribed them valium and we
[03:33] lo I didn't know women not to complain
[03:36] 50 years ago. That's funny. Um so we've
[03:39] always hold on a second. Why are suicide
[03:40] rates going up more for women? I think
[03:42] that encouraging materially women are
[03:44] killing themselves more. Why is that? I
[03:47] think that even if both men both men and
[03:49] women have become unhappier, men's
[03:50] suicide rates have risen as well and
[03:52] that's also been exponential. Can you at
[03:53] least concede that feminism offers only
[03:55] one potential explanation? There could
[03:57] be also other explanations. obviously,
[03:58] but feminism is the the glaring thing in
[04:01] front of us where we have fertility
[04:02] rates down, we have marriage rates down,
[04:04] we have unhappiness up, and we did
[04:07] something in the 1960s out of the
[04:08] universities of Betty Fredane and Gloria
[04:11] Steinum and all these feminists that
[04:12] basically said, "You're trapped in a
[04:13] home. Go get a job, freeze your eggs,
[04:15] take birth control, and all of a sudden,
[04:17] women are way unhappier than they were
[04:18] 40 years ago." And I just have to ask
[04:20] the question, why is that? Is it
[04:22] working? And maybe there are biological
[04:25] differences between men and women that
[04:26] we should respect. and that deep down a
[04:28] lot of women want to get married and
[04:29] have children. In fact, we should
[04:30] applaud it and we should support it and
[04:32] we should say it means nothing if you're
[04:34] going to go be a CEO of some shoe
[04:35] company or be some banker in London.
[04:37] What matters if you raise children and
[04:39] you have something to pass down long
[04:41] after you're gone. Yeah, I think I would
[04:42] bring two points to that. The first one
[04:44] is just really simple, which is that you
[04:45] can ascribe liberalism all you want as
[04:47] the cause of the unhappiness. I would
[04:48] argue something else. I would say that
[04:49] it's certain economic policy that has
[04:51] very little to do with the social
[04:52] acceptance of alternative lifestyles. I
[04:54] would say that we can recognize that
[04:55] income inequality of across a vast swave
[04:57] of western countries has increased which
[04:58] causes all kinds of social ills. A lack
[05:00] of social cohesion. Housing price growth
[05:02] doesn't correspond with wage growth.
[05:04] Monopolies increasingly become kind of
[05:05] emboldened to interfere with politics
[05:07] and monopolies don't prioritize social
[05:09] health either. I think that those offer
[05:10] more compelling reasons for a decline in
[05:12] happiness than an increase in freedoms
[05:14] because just one more thing on an
[05:15] intuitive basis generally speaking
[05:17] people want more freedom not less. Okay.
[05:19] So if that's true, why is it do you do
[05:21] do you agree that the happiest women of
[05:22] the West are married with kids? Um I
[05:24] would have to look into it, but I think
[05:25] there are certain there are certain and
[05:27] objectively we know that, right? The the
[05:28] women with kids are not the ones tearing
[05:29] down statues, right? They're they're the
[05:31] ones that actually have obligations.
[05:32] Tearing down statues correspond to some
[05:34] kind of smiles per capita data set that
[05:35] I wasn't aware of. Again, it's like it's
[05:37] a little bit of a
[05:39] oneliner. The the happy and the grateful
[05:42] the happy and the grateful usually don't
[05:44] go burn down Wendy's in their spare time
[05:46] of which we saw in our country all
[05:47] throughout a single summer. But as a
[05:48] side note, you would agree objectively
[05:50] study after study, survey after survey,
[05:52] that the women of the West that are
[05:54] married and have children, especially a
[05:55] lot of children are far happier than
[05:57] even the ones that earn more money
[05:58] correlated at the same age. So I also
[06:00] don't think that happiness is a very
[06:02] good metric and neither do you because
[06:03] you think gay people shouldn't just
[06:04] pursue happiness by being gay. They have
[06:06] other moralistic considerations to be
[06:07] making. So I don't think smiles per
[06:09] capita is a particularly convincing way
[06:11] to measure whether or not we should
[06:12] encourage women to be autonomous. I
[06:14] think we should maximize agency within a
[06:16] fair system that has reasonable
[06:17] parameters because it's expedient, it's
[06:18] good for the economy, it's logical, it's
[06:20] the moral thing because if we can't
[06:21] prove the material harms, we shouldn't
[06:22] discourage it. And also, self-reported
[06:24] studies is a really flawed way to do
[06:26] psychology. It's the week before my
[06:27] university exams uh right now and I'm
[06:29] standing here explaining the basic basic
[06:31] methodology be behind survey collection
[06:33] in sociology, which you don't even think
[06:34] is a real subject, to Charlie Kirk. If I
[06:37] took one of those surveys right now, I'd
[06:38] check extremely miserable. But so would
[06:40] a Palestinian child who's been taunted
[06:41] to smithetherines. How are we going to
[06:42] say extremely miserable? No, I'm I'm
[06:44] kind of making a joke. No, I mean, but
[06:46] ser like as a but hold on. I mean like
[06:49] that's an important point though is that
[06:51] the women in the West have it the best
[06:53] in the world and yet they're way
[06:55] unhappier than women of subsaharan
[06:56] Africa. There's something fundamentally
[06:58] wrong here because the women of
[06:59] subsaharan Africa have something that a
[07:00] lot of women in the west do not have.
[07:02] The women in the west have cats and they
[07:04] have good jobs. And the women of
[07:05] subsaharan Africa, they have a belief in
[07:07] the divine and they have kids. And maybe
[07:09] there's a biological undercurrent that
[07:11] is keeping a lot of women from realizing
[07:14] their full potential. And so without
[07:16] reading your phone and just like, you
[07:18] know, connecting, I'm not really reading
[07:19] my phone. Well, you you it's fine. Sure.
[07:21] Then you can answer without it. Fair
[07:22] enough. Would you agree that it's a good
[07:24] thing that more women get married and
[07:26] have children in the West? I would ask
[07:28] you, would you say that a subsahara
[07:30] African woman who's experienced female
[07:31] genital mutilation and checks extremely
[07:33] happy in a survey? And I also would
[07:35] check extremely happy in a survey. Who
[07:36] do you think would be objectively more
[07:38] happy even if they both check the same
[07:39] answer? No. Again, so I I fully if you
[07:41] want to talk about how Islam mistreats
[07:43] women, we could talk all day long. Like
[07:44] I'm I'm all for that. Me, too. Okay,
[07:46] good. So, we agree that we actually many
[07:48] things and we should shut off Muslim
[07:49] immigration to the UK, right? We totally
[07:51] agree. I think that all religious
[07:52] fundamentalism is bad. And if you take
[07:54] that logic, we should also not allow
[07:55] evangelical Christians into Hold on.
[07:57] Hold on a second. Hold on. That's funny.
[07:59] Hold on.
[08:01] Can you show me a single show me what
[08:04] would your example cuz I have 50 of a
[08:06] single Christian country that you would
[08:08] say mistreats women right America. Oh
[08:10] really? Yes. We mistreat we had a female
[08:12] woman vice president. We had a female
[08:15] vice president a female speaker of the
[08:17] house. Women earn more than men in
[08:18] America. Rwanda in Rwanda female
[08:20] representation in government out out
[08:22] seeds like supersedes the UK by quite a
[08:24] lot. Do women get treated better in
[08:26] Rwanda? Okay. Is I might be super off
[08:29] this like is Rwanda Islamic? Like I'm
[08:31] not totally sure. I don't think it is.
[08:32] Like is it like I don't know actually. I
[08:35] don't it's not. So again, we were
[08:37] talking about Islam. It's a little bit
[08:38] of side note, but you must be morally
[08:39] clear because you brought up female
[08:41] gender mutilation, which is a teaching
[08:43] of the Islamic faith. But as a side
[08:45] note, like again, this is very
[08:48] important, which is I'm not here to
[08:50] require you to do anything or not. I'm
[08:52] making a simple observation which is
[08:55] which is objectively true regardless.
[08:57] The women of the West are miserable and
[09:00] they're miserable for a reason because
[09:01] we've told them to suppress how they are
[09:03] made by God and pursue something else
[09:05] and get a bunch of trinkets and get a
[09:07] bunch of promotions and they end up at
[09:10] 38 years old with a big flat in London
[09:12] and they're miserable and we should tell
[09:14] them to stop freezing their eggs and
[09:16] start finding their partner earlier and
[09:17] have lots of babies. Yeah. Okay. I think
[09:19] I'd bring two just final points to this.
[09:21] First one is just really intuitive,
[09:22] right? Which is that if you actually
[09:23] care about women's happiness, then the
[09:25] solution is to structurally support
[09:26] them. That means universal child care,
[09:27] shared legally enforceable parental
[09:29] leave. Um, and in Nordic countries where
[09:31] women have high workforce participation,
[09:33] and also some state support, they report
[09:35] higher life satisfaction than in more
[09:36] conservative countries including
[09:37] America. So if your metric is high, just
[09:38] do satisfaction surveys. You just told
[09:40] me they're BS. So are satisfaction
[09:42] bull do you acknowledge satisfaction
[09:44] surveys or not? You just told me that
[09:46] they're BS. Do you think they're object
[09:48] that we can use that as data? I don't
[09:49] think that is the only sole data set,
[09:51] but it is the data set. You told me
[09:53] there's a flaw and you self-report.
[09:55] Okay. By by the macro self
[09:57] self-satisfaction data, I am correct.
[09:59] And you are right. When you have paid
[10:00] family leave, you are happier. I'm
[10:02] actually a proponent of that. At Turning
[10:03] Point USA, we pay for six months when
[10:05] somebody has a child. I think there's a
[10:06] lot of agreement we can have on that. We
[10:08] need to encourage having more children.
[10:09] I think the Hungarian child policy is
[10:11] phenomenal. We should look at that
[10:12] because the greatest thing that is
[10:14] plaguing the West is we're not having
[10:15] enough kids. And it's not just bad
[10:17] because we won't have a future. It's
[10:18] also bad because the present is awfully
[10:20] miserable for too many women as well.
[10:22] Okay. In which case I think we get do I
[10:23] start bring this to a close please.
[10:25] Okay. I think just one final thing which
[10:27] is in which case we get to a really
[10:28] interesting argument about what kind of
[10:29] what parts of womanhood can be
[10:30] demarcated to the social and what kinds
[10:32] of womanhood can be demarcated to
[10:34] biological. So for example my anatomy is
[10:35] demarcated to the biological. But the
[10:37] fact that I might potentially be a
[10:38] better nurturer than a man. I would
[10:39] demarcate that to the social. You might
[10:41] demarcate that to the biological. In
[10:42] which case we have differing moral
[10:43] scales of value. I would ask why we
[10:45] should necessarily prioritize your moral
[10:46] scale of value which prioritizes things
[10:48] like the birth rate when in actual fact
[10:50] there are various other moral scales of
[10:51] value and if you yourself are a free
[10:53] market American why is it the case that
[10:55] you would not like the previous speaker
[10:57] noted extend personal freedoms towards
[10:59] all spheres including a private sphere I
[11:01] believe in absolute truth claims and
[11:02] it's absolutely wrong and bad when a
[11:04] society stops having kids to replace
[11:06] their own population and then you have
[11:07] to import the third world and you become
[11:09] the third world it's bad I disagree but
[11:11] thank you okay thank
[11:13] [Applause]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.