Up Next
Niall Ferguson Explores Two Competing Historical Narratives of Donald Trump's Political Legacy and Impact
6:40
Charlie Kirk Debates Student on Trump, Free Speech, and Disinformation at Campus Event
18:46
Charlie Kirk and Jack Hibbs Expose the Great Reset and the Global Agenda Behind America's Dismantling
20:05
Charlie Kirk Defends Trump at Oxford Union Debate: Has the President Gone Too Far?
Charlie Kirk traveled to Oxford Union to defend President Trump in a heated debate over whether the administration has overstepped its bounds. Facing opposition from Oxford students and faculty, Kirk argued that Trump is simply delivering on his campaign promises within constitutional boundaries. The debate covered everything from executive orders and deportations to DEI policies and border security, with Kirk challenging what he sees as Britain's abandonment of Western values. In his closing remarks, Kirk didn't just defend Trump's actions—he called for even more aggressive measures on immigration, DEI elimination, and cultural preservation, while urging Britain to reclaim its own greatness.
The Motion: Trump Has Gone Too Far
The Oxford Union debated the proposition that President Trump has gone too far in his second term. Opening speakers for the proposition accused Trump of tanking the economy with a $2.4 trillion deficit, gutting global aid, ruining NATO, and deporting American citizens without fair trial. They claimed Trump has slashed US aid by 62%, leaving humanitarian operations adrift, and that his family's net worth has increased three billion dollars in just 100 days while he signed only five bills into law—the worst performance in over a century.
Speakers argued Trump is "not just corrupt, not just a moral vacuum, but an ego out of control." They pointed to his 70 executive orders and pardoning of over 70 January 6 participants, his rolling tariffs on 90 countries, and what they described as backsliding into 1930s-style authoritarianism. One speaker warned that Trump has fundamentally unraveled the Constitution, paralyzed the courts, and sent the world lurching toward financial ruin.
Division, Distraction, and Deflection
An American speaker on the proposition side outlined three ways Trump has gone too far: division, distraction, and deflection. She argued Trump has divided Americans from one another by calling opponents "vermin" and fueling fear between neighbors, with hate crimes projected to increase by over 80 percent. She claimed he has divided America from its allies by praising autocrats while undermining democratic partners, and divided Americans from truth itself by making it harder to trust facts about the economy, healthcare, and climate change.
On distraction, she argued Trump manufactures crises to avoid addressing root causes. She pointed to mass incarceration as his answer to crime rather than addressing poverty and mental illness, noting America holds nearly one-quarter of the world's prisoners. She claimed Trump fuels moral panic about transgender athletes—affecting dozens of people—while distracting from the fact that over 90 percent of violence against women is committed by cisgender men. She noted that gun violence is the leading cause of death for American children, with over 4,300 kids killed annually, yet Trump remains silent while attacking teachers and slashing education budgets.
On deflection, she argued Trump avoids accountability by blaming election workers for his loss, inciting insurrection, weaponizing immigration, and calling the press the enemy of the people. She noted America now ranks 55th in global press freedom, the lowest in modern history.
The Opposition's Case: Trump Is Delivering on His Mandate
Opposition speakers countered that "gone too far" is a vague, elastic phrase that sounds more like an emotional expression than a rigorous standard. They argued Trump is going where he said he would—loudly, brazenly, and for the second time. He's not overreaching; he's delivering on the promises that got him elected.
One speaker argued Trump is working within constitutional boundaries, doing what he was democratically elected to do. While Trump signed executive orders faster than "freshers sign up for societies they'll never attend," this isn't illegal—it's efficient. Obama signed over 270 executive orders, Biden crossed 160, and Trump is simply operating like every modern president in a gridlocked system. When courts disagreed with him, he didn't dissolve the judiciary or arrest judges. The system worked, even when headlines got messy.
The opposition argued Trump isn't trying to abolish Congress, rewrite the Bill of Rights, or throw out separation of powers. He's operating within the framework loudly and legally. Over 60 million Americans heard his message, saw the chaos, weighed the controversy, and still voted to make America great again. His 2024 campaign was a checklist, and he's ticking the boxes: rolling out apprenticeships and STEM grants for young people, providing tax relief and energy infrastructure for working-class Americans, keeping insulin prices capped for the elderly, and cutting legal immigration application queues by nearly 30 percent through digitization.
Trump's Use of Executive Power
A history professor speaking for the proposition argued Trump is not unprecedented in pushing boundaries of executive power, but he is unprecedented in not being held accountable. She compared him to Andrew Johnson, America's first impeached president who welcomed Confederate rebels after the Civil War, and Richard Nixon, who was forced to resign when he lost support of his own party. The difference with Trump, who has been impeached twice without removal, is that he hasn't been held accountable.
She corrected opposition claims about executive orders, noting that in his first 100 days, Trump signed 147 executive orders—a number Biden signed over four years, not 100 days. Trump has brought up the yearly average of executive orders since 1944. He has pardoned 1,500 January 6 rioters, a controversial use of clemency power. As commander-in-chief, he's organizing a birthday military parade that could cost up to 45 million American dollars for taxpayers.
She argued Trump likes to create crises because he can control them—the idea of "I am the storm" borrowed from Andrew Jackson, a president he admires. He's pushing back against traditional allies, abandoning the Iran nuclear treaty because it was associated with Obama, and launching tariff wars against Canada over fentanyl despite less than 0.01 percent of fentanyl coming across the US-Canadian border.
Immigration and Deportation Policies
The professor argued that from the start of his political career, Trump's immigration rhetoric rested on xenophobia and racism. After his 2024 re-election, Republican student groups on American campuses encouraged students to report others they believed to be in the country illegally—abandoning the principle of innocent until proven guilty.
She noted Trump has refused to comply with a Supreme Court order to return a man who should not have been deported to El Salvador's maximum security prison. She compared this to Andrew Jackson's refusal to comply with an 1832 Supreme Court decision protecting Cherokee land rights during the Indian Removal Act era—calling it the "democracy of the white man" from 200 years ago.
Trump appears fixated on a potential genocide against white South Africans that "nobody else has really heard of," allowing white South Africans to relocate to the United States while others, including those of minority racial and ethnic backgrounds, do not get the same opportunity.
Charlie Kirk's Defense
Charlie Kirk opened his remarks by challenging several claims made by the proposition. He offered 1,000 pounds to anyone who could name a US citizen deported under Trump, calling it a lie. He corrected the Charlottesville "fine people on both sides" claim, noting Trump was talking about the statue debate, not white supremacists—calling it a hoax. He pointed out that Pete Hegseth wasn't just a TV host but a decorated war hero and military service member.
On January 6, Kirk argued it wasn't an insurrection. Only a small percentage of people there did anything violent; the vast majority walked into the Capitol after being invited. He corrected the claim about the Canadian border, noting it was closed because the most terrorists entering America on the terrorist watch list come across the Canadian border, not just for fentanyl. He challenged the professor's claim of never hearing about South Africa, pointing to a major political party's "Kill the Boers" slogan as evidence of attempted genocide against white South Africans.
Kirk argued the question "Has Donald Trump gone too far?" is vague. If you dislike the West and think it deserves to be destroyed, then anything Trump does short of surrender will be too far. He argued that 100 years ago, there would have been broad agreement on what a country's leader should do, but not anymore—not because America has changed, but because Britain has changed.
Britain's Decline and Western Values
Kirk described Britain as one of the greatest countries in history—the country of Shakespeare, the steam engine, and Adam Smith that defeated Napoleon, destroyed the slave trade, and stood up to Hitler. America became great because of what it inherited from Britain. When he hears "Make America great again," he also hears "Return America to its British roots."
But Kirk sees Britain's ruling elites in a race to abandon the values that made Britain great. After 14 years of Conservative rule, he asked what they conserved. Not freedom of speech—30 people a day are arrested for offensive social media posts according to The Telegraph, and a 74-year-old woman was arrested in Scotland for praying silently within 600 feet of an abortion clinic. Members of Parliament scold British citizens for thinking they have the right to say things that offend Muslims.
They didn't conserve prosperity. Adjusted for inflation and cost of living, the average British worker makes less than in 2008. Outside London, British citizens have lower incomes than every one of America's 50 states. British industry pays four times as much for electricity as America does—the highest rates in the world, a consequence of going net-zero. Nothing kills a modern economy faster than high energy prices.
They didn't preserve the British nation. Conservatives allowed anyone from the third world to move to Britain without holding Western values or useful skills, and they could go on welfare immediately. Just last week, Keir Starmer announced he's changing the law to ensure immigrants who commit crimes are deported—because Conservatives never bothered passing that law themselves. The dying out of the British nation means the dying out of Christianity. Britain is the birthplace of Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, Anglicans, Quakers, and more, but soon Britain will have more practicing Muslims than practicing Christians.
Trump's Border Victory
Kirk argued Trump has changed the course of history and destroyed the assumption that the left's victory was inevitable. Under Biden, more than 10 million illegal aliens entered America. Guides were published on TikTok explaining how to break in. Entire neighborhoods were turned over to migrants living on welfare. America was treated as a pile of wealth for the planet to plunder at will.
Now that's stopping. Trump has cut border crossings not 90 percent, not 99 percent, but 99.9 percent. For years, leaders lied that the southern border was an unfixable mess. Trump exposed them as liars within weeks. But closing the door didn't fix the damage—there are over 10 million people in America who shouldn't be there. If somebody breaks into your home, you don't fix it by closing and locking your door. Things aren't fixed until the burglar is kicked out.
Ending DEI and Transgender Ideology
Kirk celebrated Trump's war on DEI. Even though America's Constitution explicitly forbids racial discrimination, the government under Biden ordered people to do it anyway. People were denied jobs and promotions, kids were shut out of universities based on skin color rather than ability. Companies were denied federal contracts because their owners didn't look a certain way. Every company lived in fear of being targeted for DEI offenses.
Trump has ordered DEI torn down, but Kirk wants it torn down faster. He wants every university told they're losing all federal dollars immediately if they don't stop racial discrimination. He wants the Department of Justice auditing every federal contractor to find DEI and shut off contracts wherever they find it. This cancer cannot be phased out—it must be ripped out from the core.
The same goes for what Kirk called the "toxic social contagion of transgenderism." In Biden's America, public schools and medical organizations endorsed children as young as 10 or younger taking barely tested hormones and surgically altering their bodies. In some liberal states, a parent who objects to their child's transition can lose custody. Kirk has met detransitioners who say getting sucked in was the greatest mistake of their lives.
Trump has taken steps to stop promoting this and protect women's sports. Kirk corrected a speaker who said it only affects a couple dozen people, noting that 890 biological men have stolen awards, trophies, and championships from women in America—890 women displaced by what he called "pervert men."
Kirk's Call for More Action
Kirk concluded by saying the American people want more—more deportations, more peace deals, more woke colleges defunded, more DEI parasites losing their jobs. The American people voted to put America first. His final message was directed at the Oxford audience: they should want to preserve and restore the greatness of Britain. They should want the decline to stop, and they can make it happen. Starmer wouldn't be saying what he's saying without what Trump is doing. If they want a great Britain again, not a mediocre Britain, if they want a Britain they could be proud of, they should all be wearing MAGA hats and cheering Donald Trump on every step of the way.
Video Transcript
Trump is not just corrupt, not just a moral vacuum, but he is an ego out of
control. Trump is going where he said he would, loudly, brazenly, and for the second
time. He's not overreaching, he's delivering.
I put the motion before the house. This house believes that Trump has gone too far. And opening the case for the
proposition is Anna Trafamovia, the librarian in St. John's College. [Applause]
I yield the chair to Mina Malalam chief of staff. This house believes that Trump has gone too far. Trump has tanked the
American economy with a $2.4 trillion deficit. But side opposition will tell
you that Trump has not gone too far. Trump is gutting the global economy, but
their side will tell you that Trump has not gone too far. Trump has ruined NATO.
Trump has slashed global aid. Trump has all but abolished the rule of law. But
the opposition will still tell you that he has not gone too far. Trump has deported American citizens to camps
without fair trial. But the opposition will still tell you he has not gone too far. Trump's budget will deny 14 million
American citizens healthcare. Would 15 million be too far? Would 30? This is
just year one. But no, still the opposition will tell you Trump has not gone too far.
Trump is intent on relegating women to secondclass citizens. Trump wants to end
free speech as we know it. He is bankrolling Israel's Gaza genocide. And he's cozied up to Putin while throwing
Ukraine under the bus. And Trump single-handedly has set the history
profession back god knows how many years by proving the great man theory of history right as the single most
destructive individual of the 21st century. But no, Trump hasn't gone too
far. The noble Charlie Kirk will tell you Trump is not ambitious. If it was so, it is a grievous fault and
grievously has Trump answered it. I speak not to disprove what K will say, but I am here to speak what I do know.
Many Americans voted for Trump and not without cause. America is in crisis. It
is a democracy dictated by corporate interests, by disillusionment and disarray. But Trump is not the solution.
In only 100 days, he has not only gone too far, he has taken steps to fundamentally unravel the constitution
of the founding fathers, paralyze the courts, and send the world lurching towards financial ruin. He has slashed
US aid by 62%, leaving key humanitarian operations in Somalia, Haiti, and
Myanmar a drift. At 3.8%, 8% Trump has about as much hope of controlling
inflation levels as he does trying to rein in his own inflated ego.
In only a 100 days, the Trump's family's net worth has increased three billion.
That's about 1 billion a month since he t since the time he took office. In that same amount of time, Trump has only
signed five bills into law, marking the single worst performance to a start of a presence term in more than a century.
The only thing that Trump has not gone quite far far enough in is fashion. If you're going to use the fascist
playbook, you might at least get Hugo Boss to design your MAGA hats.
Madame President, thank you for the incredible honor of speaking in this debate tonight. I'm glad to see you
hosting a debate on a president that has gone too far. Although you yourself haven't tried to force through rules
reforms in the House, appoint over 50 of your friends to committee as NAPO
babies, or strike half of the union's electoral officials, which in my opinion shows that you clearly haven't gone far
enough. That being said, you still have over four weeks left in office. Um, and I'm incredibly excited to see where you will
go from here. On a more serious note, I'm excited and happy to see the members
of the union, unlike our counterparts in America, are more comfortable with electing a highly qualified woman to the
most senior office in this society. I hope that any American friends in the audience tonight are taking notes.
On the subject of guests, those with an observant eye will have seen in the term card that Naib Bukelli, president of El
Salvador, will be paying us a visit later in the term. I hope that the president will ask him about his recent
illegal incarceration of American citizens at the instruction of his American sugar daddy who's currently
pigging it out in his $400 million palace in the sky. Sorry, I meant gift of a jet from Qatar.
Just yesterday, the USA was downgraded from its last AAA credit rating with
Moody citing insurmountable concerns about fiscal debt and tax cut legislation. Getting an A, I should
explain, Charlie, is something that you do in school. And I'd like at this point um to apologize to my dear tutor, Dr.
Laura Smith, who is speaking also on side proposition. I promise that you will have the essay next week. I've been
a little too caught up in writing this speech. Actually, if there is any chance of changing the topic to Trump's
America, I might have the essay halfwritten. In a 100 days and by fiat alone, Trump
has signed 70 executive orders and pardoned over 70 individuals convicted
for the January 6th insurrection. He has rolled out and then rolled back in tariffs on over 90 countries. They say
that the past repeats itself, but it seems that backsliding into the authoritarianism of the 1930s has come a
decade early. To say he has not gone too far, as the opposition must, is to say
that any one of the individually unacceptable acts, of which there are too many to list, are actually
acceptable and more than this, good. A vote for the opposition is a vote that
it is good to storm Congress, to to bribe escorts. It's a vote for a president who won't rule out the
possibility of running for a third term because it is quote too early to think about. All the while making the lives of
ordinary people immeasurably worse. Actually, it is measurably worse. Under
Trump, you can be thousands of dollars poorer. Trump appointed Elon Musk to run Doch.
Musk, a man that thinks that grass is something you smoke and who thinks that a meme is when you cut 30 million
people's pensions. After the neo-Nazi Charlottesville riot, Trump famously
said that there are some very fine people on both sides. A sentiment that he clearly took to heart in appointing
Elon, a man whose love of throwing Roman salutes is second only to his
self-proclaimed love of ketamine. But then perhaps Trump and Elon is just
the ultimate story of male friendship. After buying Twitter because he didn't have any real life friends, Musk with
Twitter can join Trump with Truth Social in the enviable company of probably not a lizard, Mark Zuckerberg, and in the I
own my own social media club. Now, Charlie, I'm sorry you got left out here, but I don't think that having kids
pretend to be MAGA youth for Instagram reels quite cuts it. Trump is not just corrupt, not just a
moral vacuum, but he is an ego out of control. He's a danger to himself and to
others. He's authoritarian and impulsive. Now, it's a bit rich for the
union with its recent leadership to talk of presidents being authoritarian and
impulsive. That being said, perhaps America could take a leaf out of the union's playbook
and try removing their president, even the ones that have been democratically elected.
If you don't think that Trump has gone too far, at what point would you say that he has crossed the Rubicon? If your
neighbor is deported in the middle of the night, probably killed. If books are
burned, if there is martial law on the streets, if your sister isn't allowed to
go to high school, go on Trump, go for the Gilead. Trump's whirlwind and blitz creek of abuse in only a 100 days spells
a dark future for us all. I fear not only for America but for the rest of the
world. So vote and vote for the proposition and as you vote enjoy doing
it because in America in a few years time at this current trajectory you
probably won't have such a luxury. Thank you so much.
I now look to Serene Singh Christ Church College to continue the case for the proposition.
[Music] [Applause]
As an American, I grew up on Disney. Classic family entertainment. However,
one character always fascinated me. It wasn't Mickey or Goofy. No, it was
Donald Duck. Yeah, that Donald Duck. that cartoon duck with the temper so bad that even my uncle at Thanksgiving
looked like a saint. But every time Donald tries now, in one episode, let me
tell you about what Donald Duck did. I remember this very vividly. You see,
Donald Duck was trying to fix up his old beatup car, but every time Donald tries
to start that car, the engine backfires. The horn blasts, doors are flying open,
the steering wheels wobbling, smoke's billowing out. But what does Donald do?
Does he stop and fix the thing? No way. He slams the gas pedal harder and
harder. No brakes, no pit stop, no mechanic in sight. Just pedal to the
metal, baby. As a kid, I watched an angry duck stomp around shouting
nonsense and driving his little cartoon car into walls. I thought I'd left
Donald behind when I grew up. But little did I know, we'd have another Donald
doing the exact same thing. Every time he breaks something, a law, an
election's integrity, a democratic norm, he slams the gas harder. So when
Americans and all of us today ask the question, has Trump gone too far? I say
he's not just gone too far, he's still going too far. Only problem is this time
the car is America. So tonight, I'll show you how President Trump has gone too far through three powerful
realities. First, division. Second, distraction. And third, deflection. If
even one of those holds true for you, Trump has gone too far. You must affirm tonight's motion. So, first, as a seek
American woman, the central tenant of my faith is that we are all one. Many of us
in this room believe this. Trump has sought to divide us from one one
another, two, from our allies, and three, even from the truth. In dividing
Americans from one another, President Trump has fueled fear and resentment between neighbors. He calls political
opponents vermin, brands immigrants as murderers, and attacks queer and transame.
According to the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, hate crimes across race, religion, gender, class,
and disability have either increased or are projected to increase by more than
80% in Trump's America. His rhetoric has deepened hostility among family,
friends, and everyday people, making Americans who once saw family and
community see enemies. In dividing America from our allies, President Trump
has praised autocrats while undermining democratic allies. He supported policies enabling the mass force displacement of
Palestinians. Displacement they continue to resist and endure. He's threatened to acquire Canada and Greenland, floated
military action in Panama, and publicly insulted NATO and leader NATO and
leaders of the Ukraine while defending dictators like Putin, Kim Jong-un, and
Xiinping. This isolationist approach also divides Americans from number three, the truth. President Trump has
made it harder for Americans to trust facts. And when Americans stop trusting
the people who inform them of their public health, education, or their elections, they have nowhere else to
look but towards him. He's told Americans that the economy is booming. While wages remain stagnant,
homelessness has risen 12% in 2025 alone, and one in five children in the
United States faces hunger in the wealthiest country on Earth. He claimed he created the best healthcare in the
world while millions remain uninsured and medical debt is still the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the
United States. He paints climate change as a hoax while wildfires, floods, and extreme heat
worsen every year and indigenous communities pay the price. That's not just a spin, it's a strategy. Because
when Americans do not know what is true, they cannot demand what is just. That's
how he divides us not only from each other but from literally the reality we
exist within. So second distraction,
you'll notice a pattern. When there's a real fire, Trump pulls out the alarm somewhere else. He doesn't address the
root causes of crisis. He manufactures new ones to distract us from focusing on
real problems. I'm going to specifically address only three. Safety in society,
safety for women, and safety for children. He claims he brings safety, law, and order. An interesting priority
for someone who's been convicted of 34 felony counts. But his solution, build
more prisons, imprison more people, punish, and repeat. Research shows that
mass incarceration does not solve the issues that cause crime. Poverty, mental illness, and
addiction. It punishes people for symptoms of real problems. And if you
still believe prisons solve crime, consider this. America locks up more people than any country on Earth,
holding nearly 1/4 of the world's prisoners. If mass incarceration made us
safer, we'd be the safest nation on Earth. But instead of reversing this, President
Trump pushes us further into an unsafe reality. Choosing handcuffs over housing, prisons over treatment, he
doesn't just distract us from the real roots of crimes. He deepens the crisis that exist. He claims that America is
safer for women. President Trump says that he will protect women, and he does. But look closer at what he does and how
he actually distracts us. He fuels moral panic about people who are transgender
in sports. A policy obsession that targets a few dozen individuals nationwide.
No, no, thank you. While distracting from over 40 million women, half of our
country, who have identified a very clearly what the threat is of the real harm,
which you all know is cisgender men. According to data by the National Crime
Victimization Survey, over 90% of violence experienced by women is committed by cisgender men. But
President Trump had banned books, not predators. He targets drag shows, not
domestic violence. Under his leadership, women's healthcare access has plummeted.
Maternal mortal mortality rates have risen, and survivors of violence face greater barriers in courts and in
hospitals than perhaps ever before. Meanwhile, President Trump surrounds himself with men credibly accused or
convicted of sexual violence, not removing them, but elevating them to decision-making positions. If safety
were really the goal, the threats women experience wouldn't be invented, and the
real ones wouldn't be ignored. He claims America is safer for children. In
America today, the leading cause of death for children and teens is gun violence. Over 4,300 kids are killed by
guns each year. And more than 17,000 are wounded. That is 60 children every
single day. In just 2025, there have already been 177 mass shootings. And
yet, President Trump is silent. Instead of passing laws to keep kids safe in
schools, he attacks teachers, slashes education budgets, and distracts the public with crusades against story hours
and books in school libraries. Children are not unsafe because of what they're reading. They are unsafe because their
classrooms are war zones. When you keep pulling fire alarms for fake fires, no one notices when the
building you're in is actually burning. But here's the truth. You cannot fix a crisis you refuse to understand. So
finally, my third point, deflection. President Trump doesn't look for solutions. He avoids accountability. He
blamed election workers for his own loss, fueling a deadly insurrection that endangered lawmakers and law
enforcement. He blamed Congress for the violence his words incited. He's weaponized immigration to shift blame,
deporting asylum seekers without hearings, and detaining student protesters across state lines, not to
protect Americans, but to silence disscent. He calls the press the enemy
of the people, threatened journalists, and flooded the courts with lawsuits to avoid scrutiny. As a result, today,
America ranks 55th in global press freedom, the lowest it has been in
modern history. You cannot run a country by avoiding every mirror and blaming every fire on someone else. Mark Twain
once said, "It is easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled." So, I have a tough
job on this side. But tonight's debate has actually tested that because three
people have sat on this chamber's floor for the entire debate. You've stepped
over them. You've looked past them. You've ignored them. They've been holding a jar at the back of this
chamber full of critical issues that affect millions of Americans. Shelter, hunger, gun violence, unaffordable
healthcare, poverty, freedom, and autonomy. But we didn't ask who they
were. We didn't ask what they were holding. We didn't ask to help them. That jar has been sitting there with
them this whole time. And just like that, millions are left on the floor, silently holding everything he refuses
to fix. Meanwhile, this flashy jar filled with manufactured threats and
political theater grabs every headline and all of our attention, even in this
debate. Trump's America does not solve real problems. It performs around them.
If you did not notice that jar or those individuals tonight, that's not your fault. But if you leave still looking
away, then he hasn't gone too far. We all have. The thing is, if we let those
problems sit in the back of the room for long enough, we all start to believe that they belong back there. Out of
sight, out of mind. But they don't. We must get close to that jar. We must feel
its weight because when the curtain falls, it's the people on the floor who are still bleeding behind it. And that
is millions of Americans. So, House affirm today's motion because Donald
Duck was far. But Donald Trump, that's
too far. [Applause]
I thank Serene for her speech. To continue the case for the opposition, I look to Daniel Ogaloma, Regents Park
College.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, friends of democracy and friends of
drama. And of course, Madame President, thank you for the honor of speaking in tonight's debate. I must say it's a
historic and inspiring moment for me. Also, let me take this moment to congratulate you on making history in
becoming the first black woman to serve in this prestigious society as president. Well done.
Now, onto the business for today. This house believes Trump has gone too
far. But before we start passing judgment, let's ask what does gone too far even mean? Too far to whom? The
media, the woke left, or too far to people who are used to presidents who
just have eloquent speeches for eight years without action, like that former president from Chicago. Gone too far.
The phrase itself is elastic, subjective, it's vague, and often used more as an emotional expression than a
rigorous standard. It sounds like a phrase you use when your mates down the last pizza that you've already called
dibs on. It implies that boundaries have been crossed. But which boundaries?
Legal, political, democratic. Whose boundary is it? And perhaps most
importantly, too far compared to what? Compared to precedent, to expectation,
or simply politeness. Trump is going where he said he would. Loudly,
brazenly, and for the second time. He's not overreaching. He's delivering. So
tonight I'll show you that Trump is working within the constitutional boundaries. He's doing what he is
democratically elected to do and he's following through on the policies which will prove he hasn't gone too far. He's
just gone as far as he said he would. Now the proposition of course has continuously made the case that Trump is
breaking the Constitution. They'll say he trampled democracy, ignored the courts, and is basically running the
White House like it's a season 15 of The Apprentice. Here's the truth. Trump
isn't breaking the Constitution. He's following it forcefully but fatefully.
Yes, he's signing executive orders faster than freshers sign up for societies they'll never attend.
But is that illegal? No, it's efficient. Let's compare. Obama signed over 270
executive orders. Biden's crossed 160. Trump. He's simply operating just like
every modern president trying to get things done in a gridlocked system. He's
declared national emergencies. He's not the first. The National Emergency Act exists and he used it. And if you don't
like the law, blame Congress. Trump didn't write it. He just actually read it this time. And when the courts
disagree with him, and yes, some did. He didn't ignore them. He didn't dissolve the judiciary or arrest any judge. And
even in the case of Kilar Albero Gracia, yes, a deportation gone wrong. The
system didn't collapse. The courts intervened. Judges ruled the administration was held accountable.
That's not a president ignoring the law. That's the law working even when the headlines get messy.
Trump isn't going beyond the powers vested in him. As stated in article 2 in the United States Constitution, he is
using the powers of the presidency exactly as it is written, unapologetically, energetically, and in
line with the mandates he was given. Trump isn't trying to abolish Congress. He isn't attempting to rewrite bills of
rights, and he isn't throwing out separations of power to crown himself an emperor. He's operating within the
framework loudly and legally. Look, I know the Trump sequel rattled a few
cages. It was like the reboot no one asked for that somehow still shattered the box office records. But this wasn't
a a political accident. It was a democratic choice. Over 60 million
Americans heard the message, saw the chaos, weighed the controversy, and still said, "Let's make America great
again." So rewind the tapes. His 2024 campaign was a checklist, not a poem.
And guess what? He's ticking the boxes, and many Americans are winning. Young
people, he's rolled out apprenticeships and STEM grants, created real jobs, not just LinkedIn dreams. As for the
working-class Americans, tax relief and energy infrastructure, more hours, more cash, the elderly, he's kept insulin
prices in these first few weeks. legal immigration application cues cut nearly
30% thanks to digitization. So you tell me if Trump's second term has already improved financial standings of
students, workers, immigrants, and pensioners, who exactly has he gone too
far against? Everybody's saying he's making big moves. He's shaking the foundations. I
say yes, that is the job. You don't hire Gordon Ramsay and complain when he's
yelling in the kitchen. You don't reelect Trump and act shocked when he's still uh Trump. Now, I know what my
friends on the proposition will say, of course, but Trump supporters are uncomfortable with some of the things he's doing. And I say, "Welcome to
bloody adulthood. I don't even agree with half of my own Netflix suggestions half of the time. No one gets a perfect
match." And even Adele fans skip most parts of someone like you. Voters didn't
pick a genie. They picked a leader. Someone who would when handed the keys
drive, not spend the entire term adjusting the mirrors. It's messy. It's loud. But that's democracy. Let him do
his job. Now just imagine you purchase a ticket to Jamaica. You board the flight
and mid-flight you experience turbulence and the pilot tells you, "Guys, sit tight because the route he needs to take
might be ugly. It's a bumpy ride, but he still lands the plane safely at your destination. Will you say he went too
far? No. I think you'd say, "Cheers, mate. Rough ride, but we got there in the end." So, let's be very clear. Trump
isn't going too far. I just think we've grown used to politicians promising everything, delivering nothing, and
calling it process. He instead is delivering what he promised, even if it
gives CNN panic attacks every 45 minutes. Who gives a toss about Trump's tone and
politeness, his language or his tweeting? Trump is rude, they say. He's
undiplomatic. He makes people uncomfortable. Well, so does honesty. So
does follow through. So does a president who doesn't apologize every 30 seconds like a British person walking through
someone in a Tesco. Sorry. Sorry. And yes, supporters of this motion will
also say he's damaging America's international image. Look, America's image has been through worse. They once
invaded the wrong country over bad intelligence and were still selected to host the Olympics like nothing happened.
Trump being blunt isn't the collapse of diplomacy. It's just the end of pretending everyone likes each other in
the group in the G7 group chat. Here's the real threat to democracy.
Politicians who talk a good game and do nothing. Who run on dreams and govern on differing. who make hope a product but
not a plan. Trump is certainly not that man. You may not like the method, but
you can't deny the motion. Trump is moving. Friends, I'm not saying he's a
political saint. He's not even polite. I know. But that's not the requirement to be president. If Trump unnerves you,
maybe what we fear isn't overreach, it's accountability. So, I leave you with this. If democracy
still means electing leaders and expecting them to do what they say they would, then Donald Trump hasn't gone too
far. He's gone exactly as far as he is allowed to. Thank you all.
I now look to Laura Smith to close the case for the proposition.
[Applause]
Thank you so much for this opportunity. It's great to be back in Oxford. Um I suppose uh I really owe actually a debt
of thanks to our friend Mr. Kirk here because uh you know I I'd love to think that my students have wait this long to
hear me lecture but uh to be honest with you um you know been here this long just because of him but I must caution you
entertainment is on this side for you education is on this side.
Now I got to mention one thing that has been a sort of running current through the argument that you've heard from
opposition today which is this idea of he won. He got the popular vote once.
Once he got the popular vote once he did win twice. Okay. But the assumption is
that he therefore had a mandate. A lot of political scientists dispute
that there's even such a thing as an electoral mandate. that people could actually take of his word and that
somehow Elon Musk was elected too. So, you know what happens when you make assumptions, right?
And I hate to use a Democratic daycare because it's got that connotation, but you make an ass of yourself. That's what
happens when you make an assumption. Everyone knows that. Now, the word unprecedented is intrinsically
associated almost to redundancy when it comes to Donald Trump. He is not
unprecedented in being the first, he's definitely not the first president to try and push the boundaries of executive
power to beyond its scope. He is even not the first president to do so in a
time that is out of sync with his context. I can think of two other examples. Andrew Johnson after the Civil
War, he was America's first president to be impeached. Why? because he wanted to
welcome the Confederate rebels back with open arms. Like the Civil War just a bit of a brotherly scuffle, wasn't it? No
problem. Oh, all these freed African-Americans. No, let's not have any more civil rights for them. No. So,
he got impeached. He wasn't removed, but he was the first president to be impeached. Richard Nixon, here's another
example of a man acting out of the context of what was acceptable in his
times. No, he wasn't impeached because he was forced to resign. He lost the support of his own Republican party. So
what is the difference when it comes to Donald Trump? A president who's been impeached twice and not removed. He's
not being held accountable. He's pushing the against this for more executive
power. It is not acceptable in the 21st century, but so far he has yet to be held to account.
No, thank you. Presidents have formal powers and informal powers, but one of
the key ones is of course executive orders. We've already heard it tonight, but I would just like to point out that
there was a little bit of fake news over there. Okay, so let me get the numbers straight. In his first 100 days, which
is why we're here in the first place, Donald Trump signed no less than 147
executive orders. Now, to put that in context, Joe Biden signed a similar number. That's what you heard, but over
four years, not a 100 days. Big difference. So, Donald Trump has brought
up the yearly average executive orders since 1944,
all the way through the modern presidency, since FDR. Now, he has also used his pardon power,
his clemency power, another formal power. Most controversially, in his first 100 days, we already mentioned the
pardoning of 1,500 January 6 riers. hugely controversial and a huge push in
the use of executive power. He is the commander-in-chief, another immensely important formal power. What
is he using it for? Well, so far, thank goodness, he's only organizing himself a
birthday military parade. And how much is this going to cost, you ask? Well,
the Guardian suggests it could cost up to 45 million American dollars for the
American taxpayer to pay. Does this sound like the leader of the western
democracy what they would do? He likes to create crisis. Now we all
know that when there's a crisis for example he was in charge when there was
COVID when there was crisis with Black Lives Matter George Floyd an economic crisis related to COVID how badly he
mishandled or mismanaged that. Why does he like to therefore create crisis?
because he can control them. It's this idea of controlling. Andrew Jackson, a
president he most admires, used to use the phrase, I am the storm. That's the
idea. It's like he wants to be the storm. He wants to control the narrative and create these crisis. No, thank you.
to establish himself as more powerful pushing back against traditional allies.
Can I think of an example? Too many, but I'll give you a couple. Recently, he's got really keen on this idea of an Iran
nuclear treaty. Wow, I feel like I'm in 2015 again. Wait, we had one of those.
Oh, yeah. It was under President Barack Obama. And yet, because it was associated with Obama, it became no more
under Trump. And now he's trying to create a treaty with no trust whatsoever. He talked in his election
about the Panama Canal and most egregiously recently in terms of the economy, his tariff wars going after
America's one of their oldest and strongest allies, Canada. Why? Fentinel
is racing across the border. We got to stop it. It's dangerous. How much fentinel comes across the
Canadian US border? 0.01%. I'm sorry, that's wrong. Less than 0.01%
01% comes across the US Canadian border. And of course, I would be remiss to talk
about Donald Trump if not to talk about immigration and his deportation policies. From the start of his
political career, a mere 10 years ago, his immigration rhetoric rested on
xenophobia and racism. And I'm not going to dignify this chamber by repeating some of it.
What it has created is it has encouraged some of the worst of Americans and
statements to come out to feel vindicated. For example, in American campuses today
after his re-election 2024, some Republican student groups were actually encouraging their fellow students to
report other students they believed to be there illegally.
So, you are now innocent. no longer innocent before proven guilty.
He has been told by the Supreme Court, his own Supreme Court, one might say, considering that he appointed three of
the justices, that he must return a man who should not have been deported to El
Salvador's max security prison. He must return him. And he refuses to do it. The
president has enforcement. He is utilizing this power to an extreme extent.
like this he is mirroring Jackson. Jackson is the one who 200 years ago almost 200 years ago in 1832 the Supreme
Court said no Cherokees Native Americans must be able to stay on their land. They said this to
someone who had driven through the Indian Removal Act of 1830. And Andrew Jackson ignored it. Why?
Because he was living in the democracy of the white man. That was almost 200
years ago. Thank God we no longer live in the democracy of the man. Although I
do notice a bit of a gender divide here, which may reflect the support that Donald Trump has and that gender divide
of his own. Another really interesting thing I find about Donald Trump and his use of power
and deportation and immigration policies creating the crisis, he seems to be
really fixated on a potential genocide in South Africa against white South
Africans. Nobody else has really heard of this. And yet white South Africans, no thank
you. You'll get your chance, Mr. Kirk. Like my students, they get their chance.
So these white South Africans are able to come and relocate to the United States
while others, including those of minority, racial, and ethnic backgrounds, do not get that privileged
opportunity, the same privileged opportunity. Finally, I'd be remiss without
mentioning Doge. Of course, I mentioned before Elon Musk. I mentioned before how he was unelected.
Getting hand cramped there, Mr. Kirk. Lots of notes. I'm looking forward to it. Oh, I'm looking forward to it. I'm
looking forward to it. So, when it comes to Doge, we know that
he is not the first president to try and reorganize and restructure the American government. William Taft there 1909 1913
he did it from a fashion of organizing of studying it of specialism. This was a
period in which Congress and he got together while he used unilateral power got together and worked together to
ensure that they had someone who was a specialist in government to steady it for almost four years before slashing.
There was no chainsaw government. It was streamlining government and it certainly wasn't denigrating those very unflashy
civil service jobs that people do tirously day in and day out and mostly
thanklessly as well. So ladies and gentlemen, I ask you in my final 30 seconds, 30 seconds, how do we judge
whether a president has gone too far when the method that the founders gave us, the high crimes of misdemeanor, the
last block of check, the impeachment mechanism, seems meaningless for a man who has been impeached twice. How do we
hold him to account? Well, by the only means that we know how and that we spearheaded. We must vote. We must vote
in proposition. We must vote by democratic means to prove that Donald Trump has gone too far. Thank you very
much.
I thank Laura for her fine speech. And now closing the case for the opposition and indeed the whole debate, Mr. Charlie
Kr. My final
Okay. Uh, before I begin my prepared remarks, I feel like I got to run the gauntlet. Uh, first I'll give you a,000
pounds right now if you could tell me the US citizen that was deported under Donald Trump. You said that twice.
Yeah. The US citizen that was deported under Donald Trump. Can anyone tell me thousand pounds? I'll give it to you right now. Yeah. Name
wrong. Not a US citizen. Salvador citizen El Salvador. Anybody else? US citizen deported under Trump. Nope.
That was a lie. You should know better than that. You go to Oxford. So that is a correction. Number two. Can you tell me when it comes to Charlottesville
something you said when Donald Trump said that there were people on both sides? He was actually talking about the
statue debate, not what you said. So that's a hoax. That's line number two. Um Oh yeah, you said that somebody over
here said something about uh Pete Hegth being nothing more than a TV host. You should also mention that he was a
service member of the military. Nope. Sorry. I'm going to talk uninterruptedly. Thank you. Service
member and was a decorated war hero. Funny you didn't mention that. Oh, yes.
January 6 came up multiple times. From You tried your best, but from you. Um,
and from the opposition, it's not an insurrection. You've called them all rioters. It's funny. A small
percentage of people that were actually there on January 6th did anything violently. The vast majority walked into the capital building after they were
invited. Also, back to your point, um, I certainly hope reform and AFD wins. Uh, so I hope that it's not to teach Trump a
lesson that he goes too far. We'll get that in a second. Finally, the Donald Duck really, like what was that all about? What is this jar? I have no idea
what you're talking about in the back of the room. It's like it's completely lost on me. So, I don't know what that what
that's all about. Um, also on the Canadian border, the professor failed to mention that the Canadian border was
closed. President Trump said fentanyl and the amount of terrorists that are coming across the Canadian border, of which the most terrorists that come into
America come across the Canadian border on the terrorist watch list. You did not mention that. And finally, professor,
you never heard of it in South Africa. Interesting. You never heard of that. The fact that a a major political party
in South Africa says, quote, "Kill the boores. Kill the boores." I would expect more of somebody who wrote dissertation
and teaches here at Oxford to say that you would not know about the attempted slaughter and genocide of white South
Africans. Okay, now on to we I'm sure there's lots of POIs and I will talk uninterrupted now to my remarks, but
actually is that all of it? Let me see here. Yeah, that's just a taste. Hello everybody. It's great to be here
tonight. Thank you to the Oxford Oxford Union for inviting me.
I never went to university. I take that as a great compliment. So therefore, everyone who went to university should be able to run circles around me. You'll
be the judge, but I'll do my best. Has Donald Trump gone too far? Well, I can nitpick at how vague that question is.
What is too far exactly? Are his tweets too long? Can all of us even agree on what we're
aiming at? I don't think so. The truth is this. If you dislike the West and if
you hate the West's values, if you think the West is evil fundamentally and deserves to be destroyed, then anything
Donald Trump does basically short of surrender will be too far for you. If I
was visiting the school hundred years ago speaking in support of an American president, I think we would at least
have some broad agreement on what a country's leader should be trying to do. But we don't anymore. I don't think it's
because America's changed. In fact, I think it's because Britain has changed. From my perspective, Britain is one of
the greatest countries in the history of the world. You were the country of Shakespeare, the steam engine, and Adam
Smith. You defeated Napoleon. You destroyed the slave trade. You stood up to Hitler. My country, America, became
great as it is because of what we inherited from you, from Britain. When I
hear the slogan, make America great again, I'm also hearing, quote, "Return
America to its British roots." Great Britain has everything in the world to be proud of. But when I look at Britain
today, I see a country where the ruling elites are in a race to abandon the very values, the values that made them so
great in the first place. I wish I could blame this all on labor, all on the left, but I can't. This country just had
its 14th uninterrupted year of so-called conservative rule. And what did they
conserve exactly? Well, they didn't conserve the ancient British rights to freedom of speech. In Britain today, 30
people a day are arrested for offensive posts on social media, according to the Telegraph. Praying silently within 600
feet of an abortion clinic can get you arrested in Scotland as a 74 year old woman named Rose just learned weeks ago.
Members of Parliament scold British citizens for thinking they have the right to say things, say that they do
not have the right to say things that offend Muslims. 14 years of conservative rule didn't conserve British prosperity.
Adjusted for inflation cost of living, the average British worker makes less today than they did in 2008. Outside of
London, the British have lower incomes than every one of America's 50 states. And it never used to be this way.
British industry pays four times as much for electricity as America does. You have the highest electricity rates in
the world. A consequence of a choice of going netneutral. Nothing will kill a modern economy
faster than high energy prices. And the country that again that invented the steam engine now has some of the highest
energy prices on the planet. But above all, 14 years of conservative control didn't preserve the British nation. This
country's conservatives thought it was their moral duty to allow anyone from the third world to move here. They
didn't need to hold Western values. They didn't need to have useful skills. They could go on welfare immediately. Just
last week, Kier Starmer announced he's changing the law to make sure immigrants who commit crimes are deported because
the conservatives never actually bothered passing that law themselves. The dying out of the British nation
means the dying out of Christianity. Britain is the birthplace of Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, Anglicans,
Quakers, and more. I would guess that more Christian denominations trace back to Britain than any other country. But
soon, Britain will have more practicing Muslims than practicing Christians. I think that will be a catastrophic change
and everyone knows it. That's why it's only Muslims moving to Christian countries, never the other way around. I
don't want America to go the way of Britain. I want us to remain free. I want us to remain rich and innovative. I want us to remain Christian. I don't
want Americans to be replaced. But forget what I want. This is what the American people want. And in a
democracy, the people are supposed to get what they want. The very same people that lecture us about democracy have a
lot of problems with the consequences democracy when the people vote away that they don't like. And that's where Donald
Trump comes in. When I was growing up, people would say that Britain was where America would be 10 or 20 years in the
future. What they meant was that Britain was more leftwing than America, but we'd catch up eventually. That's just how
things were over time, and nothing could stop it. I don't hear people saying that anymore. Donald Trump is the reason why.
Almost alone, Donald Trump has changed the course of history. He's destroyed the assumption that the left's victory
was inevitable. Under President Biden, more than 10 million illegal aliens entered America. Guides were published
on Tik Tok explaining how to break into America. Say some magic words at the border and nobody would stop you. Entire
neighborhoods of American cities were turned over to migrants living on the dole. America was treated as a pile of
wealth for the rest of the planet to ponder plunder at will. Now that is all stopping. President Trump has cut border
crossings. Not 90%, not 99%, but 99.9%.
For years, my country's leaders lied that the southern border was an unfixable mess. President Trump exposed
them all as liars within weeks. But closing the door didn't fix the damage that Biden did. We have well over 10
million people in America who should not be in America. If somebody breaks into your home, you don't fix the problem by
closing your door and locking it. Things aren't fixed until the burglar is kicked out. And President Trump has been
fighting harder than ever to make that happen. But I'd be happy if we fought even harder. Of course, illegal migration isn't the only threat facing
America. In Joe Biden's America, we had the tyranny of DEI. Even though America's Constitution explicitly
forbids racial discrimination, our government ordered people to do it anyway. People were denied jobs and
denied promotions. Kids were shut out universities based on the color of their skin rather than their ability.
Companies were denied federal contracts because their owners didn't look a certain way. People who didn't discriminate enough in hiring could be
sued by the government. Every company in America lived in fear of their government deciding to target them for
offenses against DEI. Trump has ordered DEI to be torn down. But I want him to
tear it down faster. I want every university told that they're losing all federal dollars immediately if they
don't stop racial discrimination. I want the Department of Justice to start auditing auditing every federal
contractor to find DEI and shut off contracts immediately wherever we find it. This is a kind of cancer that cannot
be phased out. It must be ripped out from the core. The same goes for the toxic social contagion of
transgenderism. In Joe Biden's America, public schools and medical organizations were co-opted into endorsing this
insanity. They urged children just 10 years old or younger to take barely tested hormones and surgically alter
their bodies. In some of America's liberal states, a parent who objects to their child's transition can lose
custody. I've met dransitioners who escaped from this social poison. They tell me that getting sucked into the
first place was the greatest mistake of their lives. President Trump has taken steps to stop promoting this lunacy.
He's acted to protect women's sports. Another POI meant to make. She said it's only a couple dozen. 890 biological men
have stolen awards, trophies, and championships from women in America. It's not a couple dozen. Over 890 women
were displaced by pervert men. That's why I want Donald Trump's administration and why I support it. It's mostly what
I've gotten, but I want more of it. I'll be honest. We the American people, we want more deportations. We want more
peace deals. We want more woke colleges defunded. We want more DEI parasites to lose their jobs. The American people
voted to put America first. And you know what? You should all too. This is my final point. Do I have to stop? Okay. I
mean, you should want to No, it's fine. I I don't know the rules. I It's fine. You should want to preserve and restore the greatness of Britain. You should
want the decline to stop and you can make it happen. Starmer wouldn't be saying any of what he's saying without what President Trump is doing. If you
are honest with yourself, if you want a great Britain, again, not a mediocre Britain, if you want a Britain that you
could be proud of, you should all be wearing MAGA hats and cheering Donald Trump on every step of the way. Thank
you very much.