🚨BREAKING: THEY’RE GOING TO PRISON?! | TPUSA ALLEGATIONS EXPLAINED

[00:00] The stuff we are about to discuss here

[00:01] today are on another level. If only 30%

[00:04] of it proves to be true, then all the

[00:06] main TP USA personalities we've been

[00:08] discussing here for months could face

[00:11] some serious jail time. And that

[00:12] includes Erica Kirk, too. Because the

[00:14] new allegations made by Zach from Wolves

[00:16] and Finance are not just oops paperwork

[00:20] error. Zach from Wolves and Finance

[00:22] YouTube channel is an accountant who for

[00:24] the past few months was investigating

[00:26] the finances of TPUSA and discovered

[00:29] some shady looking things. Then he

[00:31] received a legal letter from Turning

[00:33] Point that accused him of mostly wrong

[00:36] terminology when discussing alleged

[00:38] fraud. You can watch my episode about it

[00:40] right here or just find the link in the

[00:43] description of this video. So, after

[00:44] Zach received the letter that was

[00:46] essentially made to shut him up, it had

[00:48] the opposite effect and he decided to

[00:50] double down on their case. It's kind of

[00:52] like Michael Scott, you know, going to

[00:55] date her even harder.

[00:56] >> I'm going to start dating her even

[00:57] harder.

[00:57] >> Listen to this.

[00:58] >> Robert Barnes went on a podcast called

[01:00] Paramount Tactical and they discussed a

[01:02] letter that was allegedly sent from the

[01:04] IRS to Turning Point. All right. So,

[01:07] that is just kind of the tip of the

[01:08] iceberg as far as the allegations I know

[01:10] that uh Wolves and Finances have kind of

[01:12] brought to the four against TPUSA.

[01:17] And Robert, I know I actually got some

[01:19] of the documents uh the letter from the

[01:23] IRS to Erica Kirk and TPUSA that talks

[01:26] about what their situation is as regards

[01:29] to the IRS. This letter has been

[01:31] floating around and reported on by

[01:32] mainstream news outlets like CBS. Except

[01:35] the letter itself has never been shown

[01:38] until Paramount Tactical's podcast. In

[01:41] fact, I'm guessing he was not supposed

[01:43] to show this to his audience because it

[01:46] is quite shocking.

[01:47] >> Chocolate theory, people. Chocolate

[01:49] theory. At this point, Gary from

[01:51] Paramount Tactical should open his own

[01:53] chocolate factory because while trying

[01:55] to debunk everything negative about

[01:57] Erica Kirk or TPUSA, he actually

[01:59] accidentally revealed so much more than

[02:01] we expected him to. He also confirmed

[02:04] stories while trying to debunk them.

[02:06] It's starting to look suspicious. He was

[02:08] trying to debunk Mitch Snow. He brought

[02:09] Mitch's son on his show. And the son

[02:12] suddenly confirmed Mitch's story about

[02:13] being at Fort Huka on the 9th of

[02:15] September. Then he accidentally revealed

[02:18] text messages between him and Andrew

[02:20] Kovvette which showed Andrew instructing

[02:22] Gary what to say about Erica's alibi for

[02:25] 9th of September and even how to say it.

[02:28] And now this why is it always the same

[02:30] guy? But this letter that probably

[02:32] shouldn't have been shown. We all thank

[02:34] you for your service, Gary. Please

[02:36] continue exactly what you're doing. You

[02:38] and Kovette make a great team. Anyway,

[02:40] it gets way crazier. So let's keep

[02:43] watching. Let's find out more about this

[02:45] letter and why it's so significant.

[02:46] >> It is a two-page letter on Department of

[02:48] the Treasury letter head. It says it is

[02:50] responding to a request from Erica Kirk.

[02:53] It says one, there is no IRS

[02:55] investigation currently underway on

[02:57] Turning Point. Two, all four 990 forms

[03:00] were filed by May 15th, 2025. Three, the

[03:04] next year's forms will be filed by May

[03:06] 15th, 2026. The letter is signed by

[03:09] Treasury Secretary Scott Bassant.

[03:11] Paramount Tactical is presenting this

[03:12] letter as some kind of evidence that

[03:14] there is no fraud at Turning Point. That

[03:16] is ridiculous for a number of reasons.

[03:19] We all know this because all of us deal

[03:22] with the IRS. We all know this is not

[03:24] normal behavior. Have any of you ever

[03:27] received a letter from the IRS saying,

[03:30] "Just letting you know we're not doing

[03:32] an investigation on you." No, of course

[03:34] you have not because the IRS does not do

[03:37] this and it's not coming from the IRS.

[03:39] The letter is signed by the Treasury

[03:41] Secretary Scott Basant. To me, this

[03:44] looks more like a political favor to

[03:46] Donald Trump's personal friends than a

[03:48] legitimate IRS communication. Second,

[03:51] the wording in this letter does not mean

[03:53] anything. Just because the IRS is not

[03:56] investigating does not mean there is no

[03:58] fraud going on. This does not mean that

[04:00] donors cannot sue Turning Point to get

[04:03] their money back. This does not mean

[04:04] that state attorney generals cannot file

[04:07] criminal charges against Turning Point

[04:09] executives. This letter does not

[04:11] disprove my concerns about their

[04:13] finances. And what is this? What is

[04:16] this? At the top of the page, someone

[04:18] has crossed out Mrs. Kirk and wrote in

[04:21] Erica. It looks like someone is

[04:23] proofreading Scott Bass's letter. Who

[04:26] could that be? I have reviewed so many

[04:29] White House documents and in my opinion

[04:31] that handwriting looks like it was

[04:34] written by Donald Trump. If you compare

[04:36] it to other samples of his writing, he

[04:38] does a consistent method where he writes

[04:40] a name dash name dash name dash. The K

[04:45] is very much like this K. The E is

[04:48] written the same way as this W. This

[04:50] handwriting looks like it belongs to

[04:52] Donald Trump. This letter does not look

[04:55] like it came from the IRS. It looks like

[04:57] it came from the president of the United

[05:00] States. Do you understand what this

[05:03] means? This is the only document the

[05:06] Democrats need to impeach President

[05:08] Trump. This looks like the president's

[05:11] handwriting on official letterhead of

[05:13] him interfering in an IRS investigation

[05:16] of his personal friends.

[05:18] >> Okay, so let's dissect this one. First

[05:20] of all, I read the letter. We need to be

[05:22] fair here and I want to make sure

[05:23] everyone knows that I'm not an

[05:25] accountant. I don't specialize in any

[05:27] form of finances. I'm clueless. But I

[05:30] did read the letter and it says, "Mrs.

[05:32] Charles Kirk, Co turning Point USA, Inc.

[05:36] request for return information of

[05:38] Turning Point USA incarning point Action

[05:40] Inc. and so on and so on." Then, "Dear

[05:42] Mrs. Kirk, this is in response to your

[05:45] letter of December 3rd, 2025 in which

[05:48] you requested certain return information

[05:50] of the four four tax exempt entities

[05:53] listed above for which you are chairman,

[05:55] chief executive officer or president. In

[05:58] particular, you requested the following

[06:00] information whether any returns filed by

[06:02] these entities are being examined or

[06:03] subject to any other current

[06:05] investigation by uh IRS and if so blah

[06:09] blah blah blah. So, when Zach said that

[06:11] the IRS doesn't just randomly send a

[06:13] letter to tell you you're all good with

[06:15] your taxes, I believe this wasn't

[06:17] random. It looks like this information

[06:20] was actually requested by Erica. So,

[06:22] it's not random. It's not like out of

[06:23] nowhere someone from IRS decided to

[06:26] email or send a letter to TPUSA and be

[06:28] like, "By the way, your taxes are fine.

[06:30] By the way, you're not being under

[06:32] investigation." You know, and I think

[06:34] this letter might have been provided to

[06:35] Candace Owens as a proof on December

[06:38] 15th, two weeks later that TP USA did

[06:40] not engage in any tax related shady

[06:43] business. This was supposed to prove it

[06:44] to Candice. I'm speculating, but it

[06:47] would make sense to me that someone

[06:48] corrected the name because on top it

[06:50] said Mrs. Charles Kirk. And since she's

[06:53] the CEO now, someone who reviewed this

[06:56] document was like, "No, you can't

[06:58] mention her dead husband's name. He's

[07:01] now gone. She's the CEO, so address her

[07:04] by Erica Kirk. I'm speculating again,

[07:07] just sharing my thoughts here. Now, Zach

[07:09] made a huge leap by suspecting it was

[07:12] Donald Trump in my opinion. It could be

[07:15] him. It could be someone else. But

[07:17] basing this whole theory on one written

[07:20] word is a bit it's a bit weak for me,

[07:24] especially after this tweet from

[07:25] Diligent Dennis. After doing a

[07:27] comparative analysis, the signature for

[07:29] the TPUSA no fraud investigation

[07:31] treasury Scott Bessent letter is only a

[07:33] 10% match for Trump's handwriting. Trump

[07:36] does all caps on his handwriting.

[07:38] However, it's 90% match for JD Vance on

[07:41] the name with a hyphen afterward.

[07:46] So, here is the comparison.

[07:49] None of us are handwriting analysts.

[07:51] Maybe someone who is and is watching

[07:53] this episode can chime in. Would it be

[07:55] absolutely insane if Trump or Vance were

[07:57] involved in the covering in the cover up

[07:58] for TPUSA? Yes, because the whole thing

[08:01] is Erica obviously requested proof that

[08:03] TP USA's tax situation is all good.

[08:06] That's in the letter. Now, is the letter

[08:08] telling the truth or someone got an

[08:11] order for it to say it's all good? This

[08:13] is what Zach is getting at here.

[08:15] >> Let me remind you of Richard Nixon.

[08:17] Nixon faced impeachment charges for

[08:19] interfering with the FBI investigation

[08:22] into the Watergate scandal. The main

[08:24] evidence was secret tape recordings of

[08:26] conversations in the Oval Office. Donald

[08:28] Trump is doing the same thing with the

[08:30] IRS investigation, but this time we have

[08:33] what looks like his handwriting on

[08:35] official letterhead. It looks like the

[08:38] White House is now part of the cover up

[08:40] at Turning Point. Let me give some free

[08:42] accounting advice to Donald Trump. You

[08:45] get this one for free, Donald. [snorts]

[08:47] Stop writing letters like this. Why

[08:50] isn't he distancing himself from this

[08:52] scandal? I highly doubt that Donald

[08:54] Trump was aware of what Tyler Berer was

[08:56] doing behind the scenes. But now with

[08:59] this letter, Donald Trump looks like

[09:01] he's getting involved. And I'm saying

[09:03] this as someone who likes Donald Trump.

[09:05] And this letter deeply bothers me.

[09:08] People have a right to be upset about

[09:10] this.

[09:10] >> Yeah, this part of the video is

[09:11] stressing me out because this theory is

[09:13] based on one written word and assuming

[09:15] it's Donald Trump's handwriting. And it

[09:18] would be a very juicy story, but we've

[09:20] all been through too much with this

[09:22] Charlie Kirk investigation already. We

[09:24] have to look at things fairly. I went on

[09:26] Grog and I compared different political

[09:28] figures handwriting to the Erica one. No

[09:31] much. Even JD Vance, nothing much. I

[09:33] even went full tinfoil mode and compared

[09:35] it to Charlie Kirk's handwriting. No

[09:38] much. Does it mean anything? Honestly,

[09:40] it means nothing. But you know me and

[09:42] AI, I'm always curious to see what it's

[09:44] going to say. And it's a shame because

[09:47] this is a weak point of this video.

[09:49] Everything else, everything else he says

[09:52] is mind-blowing. The stuff that he

[09:54] discovered available publicly, by the

[09:56] way, and he connected the dots are

[09:59] crazy. So, in the next part of his

[10:01] video, Zach shows examples of people's

[10:03] feedback about TPUSA, how they would

[10:05] donate and wouldn't receive what was

[10:07] promised in return. For example, if you

[10:09] donated $25 or $50, I don't remember the

[10:12] exact number, you were promised a hat,

[10:14] but would instead receive a rubber

[10:16] bracelet. Those are seemingly small

[10:18] things, but made a lot of people not

[10:20] donate again. But I want to get to the

[10:22] big stuff because there are some things

[10:23] about their actions that could

[10:25] potentially land them in jail. Listen to

[10:27] Zach explain the structure of all the

[10:30] Turning Point companies. It is important

[10:32] you understand it before we move to the

[10:33] most explosive portion of the video. So,

[10:35] let's go. Let us look again at the four

[10:37] nonprofit companies. We have Turning

[10:39] Point USA, Turning Point Action, Turning

[10:41] Point Endowment, and America's Turning

[10:43] Point. Three of these companies are

[10:45] 501c3 organizations. Turning Point

[10:48] Action is a 501c4. The difference is

[10:51] that a 501c3 is not allowed to

[10:53] participate in political activity. A

[10:55] 501c4 can participate in no more than

[10:59] 50% political activity. And then there

[11:01] is also turning point pack which is 100%

[11:04] political activity. Now I have seen

[11:06] arguments from people claiming that this

[11:08] is normal. They say it is normal for

[11:10] nonprofits to have multiple different

[11:12] companies. Not like this it's not. Do

[11:15] not let people gaslight you about what's

[11:17] going on here. Let me explain what is

[11:19] unusual. You would normally create

[11:21] different shell companies for different

[11:23] types of activities. For instance,

[11:25] Turning Point Endowment is for their

[11:27] investments. That's clearly a different

[11:29] type of activity. It gets its own

[11:31] company. That makes sense. Turning point

[11:33] action is a 501c4. That's a different

[11:36] type of activity. So, it gets its own

[11:38] company. What is this? Why is America's

[11:41] Turning Point separate? The company

[11:43] descriptions on the 990 form are very

[11:46] similar. It's basically education for

[11:48] young people. So, why are these two

[11:50] different companies? The only major

[11:52] difference that I see is that Charlie

[11:54] Kirk managed Turning Point USA and Tyler

[11:57] Boyer managed America's Turning Point.

[12:00] So, in a way, America's Turning Point

[12:02] existed to give Charlie Kirk plausible

[12:04] deniability. It gave Tyler Boyer his own

[12:07] 501c3 where he could do whatever he

[12:10] wanted and Charlie Kirk would not

[12:11] necessarily know about it. This is

[12:13] explained in the fine print of the 990

[12:15] form for Turning Point USA, which says,

[12:17] "Turningoint USA's other educational

[12:19] programs include campus leadership

[12:22] programs, which are hosted by Turning

[12:23] Point USA's related entity, America's

[12:26] Turning Point, with grants totaling $8.6

[12:28] $6 million.

[12:29] >> I think now you all are starting to

[12:31] suspect what's going on here. Fishy

[12:33] things with taxes and donor money. The

[12:35] things Zach is now getting at are all

[12:37] based on public tax filings, official

[12:39] letters, social media posts, job

[12:40] listings, and turning points own

[12:42] statements. I'm going to skip a lot of

[12:44] stuff he shared in between. So, go watch

[12:46] his video if you want more information.

[12:48] But essentially, at the center of all of

[12:50] this is a very simple question. What did

[12:52] smaller and bigger donors think their

[12:54] money was being used for? And what might

[12:57] it have actually been used for? People

[12:59] donated to Turning Point believing they

[13:01] were helping fund things like college

[13:02] debates, free speech events, and

[13:04] educational programs for students. In

[13:07] other words, they thought that their

[13:08] money was going to toward ideas and

[13:11] discussions, not elections. What Zach is

[13:13] questioning is whether some of that

[13:14] donated money may have been quietly

[13:16] redirected into election related work

[13:19] instead. Things like helping specific

[13:21] candidates win elections. That matters

[13:23] because charities like Turning Point USA

[13:26] get special tax benefits on the

[13:28] condition that they do not get involved

[13:30] in politics. If donated money meant for

[13:32] education was instead used to help a

[13:35] political campaign, that wouldn't just

[13:37] be misleading, it would be illegal. And

[13:39] that's why Zach says this wouldn't be a

[13:41] political disagreement, it would be

[13:43] fraud. Take a listen.

[13:44] >> How does Turning Point get involved in

[13:46] so much political activity? the only

[13:48] companies that are allowed to do

[13:49] political activity are up to 50% of

[13:51] turning point action and turning point

[13:53] pack. What happens in the real world is

[13:55] that a lot of 501c3s will perform what

[13:58] they call get out the vote efforts or

[14:00] voter education. This is defined in

[14:02] Treasury regulation 1527-6B5.

[14:06] Get out the vote campaigns must not be

[14:08] specifically identified by the

[14:10] organization with any candidate or

[14:12] political party. As long as these are

[14:14] nonpartisan activities, they are

[14:16] considered not political and that is the

[14:18] loophole that is allowed for a 501c3.

[14:21] This would include things like signing

[14:23] people up for new voter registration.

[14:26] But you cannot be pushing for Republican

[14:27] or Democrat. It has to be completely

[14:30] nonpartisan. Here's the problem. Turning

[14:33] Point USA is a 501c3.

[14:36] They are supposed to be non-political.

[14:38] But then we see Erica Kirk endorsing JD

[14:41] Vance for president. We're going to

[14:43] ensure that President Trump has Congress

[14:46] for all four years.

[14:48] [cheering]

[14:49] [applause]

[14:52] We are going to get my husband's friend

[14:54] JD Vance elected for 48 in the most

[14:59] resounding way possible. [cheering]

[15:05] This is at America Fest, Turning Point

[15:08] USA's largest event with the CEO in a

[15:11] flashy pants suit giving a speech

[15:13] endorsing a political candidate. This is

[15:15] strictly forbidden under the law for a

[15:18] 501c3. You cannot endorse political

[15:21] candidates. That is political activity.

[15:24] In my opinion, what Erica Kirk just did

[15:27] was illegal. This is effectively using

[15:30] their taxexempt donations to create a

[15:32] campaign commercial for JD Vance. And

[15:35] before you say, well, maybe it was paid

[15:37] for by one of the other companies that

[15:39] allow political activity. No, no, no. It

[15:44] says Turning Point USA behind her head

[15:47] during the speech. The tickets for the

[15:49] event were sent out from TurningPoint

[15:51] USA. The fact page for the event is

[15:54] hosted at tpusa.com and at the bottom of

[15:57] the web page, it explicitly says

[15:59] TurningPoint USA is a 501c3.

[16:02] It looks to me like the executives at

[16:04] TurningPoint are playing pretty fast and

[16:06] loose with the laws concerning 501c3s.

[16:10] >> Yes, everyone was wondering that exact

[16:12] thing when Erica proudly declared that

[16:13] they will be campaigning for JD Vance.

[16:16] And Charlie was openly campaigning for

[16:18] Donald Trump. One of the most troubling

[16:20] claims he makes has to do with how

[16:22] Turning Point Action, the branch that is

[16:24] allowed to do political work, reported

[16:26] its spending. According to official

[16:28] paperwork that organization claimed,

[16:31] only about 3% of its money was spent on

[16:34] politics. 3%. But at the same time, the

[16:37] organization openly brags online about

[16:39] running huge election campaigns in

[16:41] multiple states, paying people to knock

[16:43] on doors, chase ballots, manage teams,

[16:46] and encourage people to vote for

[16:48] specific candidates. Zach's point is

[16:51] very straightforward. Those two things

[16:53] cannot both be true. Either the

[16:55] paperwork is wrong or the political work

[16:58] is being labeled as something else to

[16:59] make it look legal. I want to play you

[17:02] one of the most disturbing discoveries.

[17:03] The letter I received last week from

[17:05] Turning Point's lawyer revealed the

[17:07] bombshell news that America's Turning

[17:09] Point was missing employees on its 990

[17:11] forms. A lot of employees. It was around

[17:15] 80 employees that were not reported. So

[17:18] now we know these people exist. The

[17:21] obvious question now is who are these

[17:24] people? What were these people doing?

[17:28] One explanation could be doorners. Of

[17:31] course, if those doornockers were

[17:33] wearing MAGA hats, that would make them

[17:36] political, which would make them illegal

[17:38] under a 501c3.

[17:40] America's Turning Point also does not

[17:43] get donations. It gets all of its

[17:45] revenue by transferring money out of

[17:48] Turning Point USA. I mentioned before in

[17:51] FY24, $8.6 million was transferred from

[17:55] Turning Point USA to America's Turning

[17:57] Point. So, let me tell you what I think

[17:59] is going on. Tyler Ber manages these

[18:02] political companies. The Trump election

[18:04] is coming up in 2024.

[18:07] Tyler Boyer realizes he needs more

[18:09] people to do ballot harvesting. So, he

[18:12] decides, let's just steal the donations

[18:15] from Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.

[18:18] So, he transfers $8.6 million into the

[18:22] company he manages, America's Turning

[18:24] Point. And then he hires a bunch of

[18:26] people for illegal political activity.

[18:30] and he tells everyone, "Come on, no one

[18:33] will ever know. Charlie Kirk doesn't

[18:35] even have to know. We will just say it

[18:38] is non-partisan.

[18:40] We will call it get out the vote

[18:42] efforts. No one's ever going to ask

[18:44] questions. No one will ever look at the

[18:46] photographs. Don't worry about it."

[18:49] Except I think that Charlie Kirk found

[18:51] out. This fits the timeline of the Baker

[18:54] Tilly audit that concluded on June 20th,

[18:57] 2025. that would have revealed all this

[18:59] information to Charlie Kirk shortly

[19:02] before his

[19:03] >> You guys really need to watch the whole

[19:05] video, but from most of Zach's findings,

[19:08] it looks like some shady things have

[19:10] been going on. Again, this last claim is

[19:12] an assumption of what might have

[19:14] happened and heavy insinuation that it

[19:16] resulted in Charlie's nation. We know

[19:18] that Candace Owen spoke about donor's

[19:20] threats and some internal financial

[19:22] shady things happening leading up to

[19:24] 910. That's why allegedly Charlie Kirk

[19:27] requested the dodge effort. I just want

[19:29] to ask again, why is Erica acting like

[19:32] all of it is nothing? Why is she acting

[19:34] like the people trying to get to the

[19:36] bottom of it all are the enemy? It's

[19:38] very strange to me. It's not strange at

[19:40] all, but you know, but those are some

[19:42] jaw-dropping findings by Zach. Suddenly

[19:44] being an accountant became the most

[19:46] dangerous and exciting job out there.

[19:48] Here's what Charlie Kirk once said,

[19:49] though.

[19:50] >> Do you know why I cried on election

[19:51] night? uh because you thought it was a

[19:53] restoration of the Judeo-Christian

[19:54] government are inherent to the

[19:55] Constitution.

[19:56] >> Let me tell you why. Because I think you

[19:57] might appreciate this as a historian. Um

[19:59] Joe Biden sent the entire federal

[20:01] government after Turning Point USA and

[20:02] me personally, they wanted me in federal

[20:03] prison.

[20:04] >> We don't want that.

[20:04] >> And and by the way, that's what death

[20:05] spots do, not Donald Trump. Let me

[20:07] finish. And so when Donald Trump won, it

[20:09] was a sigh of relief that maybe I won't

[20:11] have to go to federal prison. Maybe I

[20:13] can actually be around my kids

[20:14] [cheering] and maybe we can live in a

[20:15] free society.

[20:22] Well, everyone even outside of the US

[20:24] heard about Biden's dodge. But now with

[20:27] all these shady things coming out about

[20:29] TPUSA, could Charlie's fear be valid? I

[20:32] know people want to believe that he

[20:33] didn't know any of this and he was used

[20:35] and manipulated by people surrounding

[20:37] him. On the other hand, he was very

[20:39] smart. And I've said it at the beginning

[20:42] of this whole investigation. In order to

[20:44] get to the truth, truth, truth, truth,

[20:46] truth, people need to be ready. that

[20:48] some not so good things might come out

[20:50] about Charlie. Doesn't mean he's a bad

[20:52] guy. Doesn't mean he's evil. Favorite

[20:54] word thrown around lately. Sometimes

[20:56] people with the best intentions might

[20:58] commit questionable acts. So, just a

[21:00] reminder, stay open-minded. So, how does

[21:03] Zach summarize what would happen to TP

[21:05] USA if what he discovered was true?

[21:07] >> Tyler Boyer, prison. The CFO, Justin

[21:10] Olsen, prison. Andrew Kvette, prison.

[21:14] Blake Nef prison. Anyone who knew about

[21:17] the political activity and was involved

[21:19] in the coverup would go to prison. And

[21:22] yes, that includes Erica Kirk, whose

[21:25] name is on the letter with Donald

[21:27] Trump's alleged handwriting. Donald

[21:29] Trump, who talks all the time about

[21:31] election integrity, apparently does not

[21:34] care about election related fraud when

[21:36] it deals with his friends.

[21:37] >> Damn, he's angry. I don't know what will

[21:40] come out of this video. More legal

[21:42] letters, actual lawsuit. I guess we'll

[21:44] have to wait and see. But I will say one

[21:46] thing. Whether he's right or wrong, he

[21:48] should be very careful, especially when

[21:50] saying things about Donald Trump or IRS,

[21:53] I don't know how well it will go over

[21:54] for him to have enemies there. I think

[21:56] because he got some support after his

[21:58] last video talking about the legal

[22:00] letter from TPUSA, he got a little bit

[22:02] too high on his own supply. He has his

[22:04] new confidence, which I hope won't get

[22:06] him in trouble. We like him. He's a good

[22:10] accountant. Okay, but as usual, I want

[22:12] to know what you guys think. Does it

[22:13] seem like TP USA committed fraud or are

[22:16] the allegations far-fetched? Let me know

[22:18] in the comments. If you enjoyed this

[22:19] video, make sure to like and share it.

[22:21] And if you haven't yet, please subscribe

[22:22] to my channel, turn on the notifications

[22:24] to never miss another Daily Fredo

[22:26] episode. And for even more content,

[22:27] follow me on Instagram and X Daily

[22:29] Fredo. That's all for today. Have a good

[22:31] one.