Erika Kirk: Things Just Got Even Worse!

[00:00] Well, things just got even worse for

[00:02] Erica Kirk. This comes after Trump

[00:04] appoints her to an Air Force board. And

[00:08] you can see

[00:10] there's not support for Erica Kirk.

[00:13] Plus, I'm even running a poll to see

[00:15] what the majority of people think about

[00:17] Erica Kirk, and the results might

[00:20] surprise you. Welcome back to the JP

[00:22] Reacts channel, my freedom loving

[00:23] friend. This is where we help spread the

[00:25] light of truth and freedom. Now,

[00:28] unfortunately, Charlie Kirk is not

[00:31] really someone that people seem to

[00:33] remember. The spotlight has shifted to

[00:37] his wife, his widow. And a lot of this

[00:40] spotlight has some questions on it, and

[00:44] those questions just got a little bit

[00:46] more bold, if you will. As this comes

[00:48] out, Trump appoints Erica Kirk to Air

[00:51] Force Academy board, which is also

[00:54] something she doesn't have

[00:56] qualifications

[00:58] to contribute to. We'll take a look at

[01:01] like what her role is actually going to

[01:04] be, but more so we're going to take a

[01:06] look at what are people saying about

[01:09] Erica Kirk and what are people saying

[01:11] about this appointment. Now, just a

[01:14] disclaimer. We're no longer gonna hide

[01:17] behind the protection of victimization.

[01:21] She She's a widow. Look at her cry.

[01:24] She's a victim. We're going to grow up

[01:27] and actually look at objective reality.

[01:30] She's stepped into a role, everything

[01:33] voluntarily. She's betraying some of

[01:36] Charlie's stances, specifically with

[01:38] Israel. That's a big one. So because

[01:42] this is all voluntary actions that she's

[01:45] doing in the spotlight and in major

[01:48] roles that she doesn't have a background

[01:50] of qualifications for. We are in fact

[01:54] going to grow up and not be scared about

[01:58] the victim archetype that many people

[02:02] like to cloak around her and just say,

[02:04] "Well, she she's got immunity from any

[02:07] kind of questions or criticism

[02:10] because she's a victim. Two things are

[02:12] true at once." Yeah, she's a victim. She

[02:15] lost her husband and there's a lot of

[02:17] weird stuff. So before we look at the

[02:20] major contributions she'll be making to

[02:22] the Air Force,

[02:26] here's what people are saying about it.

[02:28] Just the news comes out. President Trump

[02:30] appoints Erica Kirk to serve on the US

[02:32] Air Force Academy Board of Visitors,

[02:35] taking the position of her late husband,

[02:37] Charlie that he was slated to hold

[02:38] before he was assassinated in September.

[02:41] Now Erica joins the panel that oversees

[02:44] morale, discipline, curriculum and

[02:46] fiscal affairs at the academy. So those

[02:48] are the basic facts. Here are how people

[02:51] subjectively see it. Family leg children

[02:55] legacy verse careerism, consumerism,

[02:58] loneliness. Which side is legacy on?

[03:02] Well, the the family and children's side

[03:03] is the one at least the public doesn't

[03:06] see Erica supporting. Maybe she is

[03:09] behind the scenes. He Yeah. So, this

[03:13] picture is not supportive.

[03:16] This picture probably also qualifies as

[03:19] skepticism towards Erica Kirk. That's a

[03:23] three-minute video we're not going to

[03:24] watch. This commenter says, "So, Candace

[03:27] was right about everything. Charlie was

[03:29] assassinated by a professional military

[03:31] hit that involved the people closest to

[03:33] him, including his own wife. So, I don't

[03:36] know that that's true. I don't know that

[03:38] it's disproven. I'm not necessarily

[03:40] super skeptical that Erica was involved

[03:42] in the the killing. That would be

[03:45] unsupportive to Erica. Now, that's what

[03:48] I call a distraction from the Epstein

[03:50] files. Yeah, lot is nowadays. Uh here's

[03:53] this one. Yes, Erica Kirk is the best

[03:56] qualified person for this position.

[03:58] LMFAO F Trump, he's a clown. Yeah. So,

[04:03] is she the best qualified for the

[04:05] position of Well, two things. the Air

[04:08] Force Board of Adviserss and is she the

[04:12] best qualified for the position of CEO

[04:14] of Turning Point? Um, many who are into

[04:18] critical thinking would say no. Those

[04:21] who are more emotionally persuasive

[04:25] would say, "Yeah,

[04:27] Charlie was the most qualified and he's

[04:30] gone unfortunately and she's his wife,

[04:32] so she's the second most qualified."

[04:36] That's definitely a a very persuasive

[04:39] emotional argument that my opinion isn't

[04:42] based on logic, reason, objective

[04:44] reality, or even common sense. It's just

[04:47] like if if President Trump were to pass

[04:50] away, the vice president becomes

[04:53] president. Vice president's second most

[04:55] qualified. Melania doesn't become

[04:58] president. the quarterback of your

[04:59] favorite football team. If Patrick

[05:01] Mahomes goes down with injury, which he

[05:03] did end of last season, his wife doesn't

[05:06] step in being touted as the second most

[05:10] qualified person to do his job. No, they

[05:15] use the second most qualified person to

[05:17] do the job. We'll see what some other

[05:19] people around the internet are saying.

[05:20] Also, check in with my poll I'm running

[05:23] to see. Yeah. What do the the masses

[05:25] think? People think Erica Kurts Kirk's

[05:28] on the up and up or do people think

[05:30] something's weird weird's going on? Stay

[05:32] tuned for that. But first, here's a

[05:33] summary of uh Erica Kirk's role at the

[05:36] Air Force Academy. Appointment details,

[05:39] whatever. You already know that.

[05:40] Responsibilities as a member. Uh Erica

[05:43] Kirk is part of a group of 16

[05:45] individuals responsible for making

[05:47] recommendations to the Secretary of

[05:49] Defense regarding changes at the Air

[05:51] Force Academy to monitoring issues

[05:53] related to morale, curriculum, academic

[05:55] methods, and other operational aspects

[05:58] of the academy. And then you see her

[06:01] background

[06:03] uh which shows yeah no qualifications

[06:06] for making recommendations about the air

[06:09] force to the secretary of defense. Uh I

[06:13] think that's changed to the secretary of

[06:15] war. Yeah. But none nonetheless or or

[06:19] morale curriculum academic methods. Man

[06:22] is talk about morale. I don't know

[06:24] across the board of conservatives.

[06:27] Leftists have never had good morale

[06:30] towards Turning Point USA. But even if

[06:32] you just take a look at conservatives,

[06:35] morale seems like it's quite low for

[06:39] Turning Point USA.

[06:41] So I guess she does have a qualification

[06:43] when it comes to morale and it's not

[06:46] necessarily bringing it in a good

[06:48] direction. So, nonetheless, I think the

[06:51] mo moral of the story is this isn't a

[06:54] real position. It's an appointment for

[06:56] show. Uh, I'd imagine their strategies

[06:59] like building her political career like

[07:02] cool started off like a low-level

[07:04] appointed position that, you know, does

[07:07] nothing. Makes recommendations to the

[07:09] Secretary of Defense and he's like,

[07:10] "Yeah, that's a good idea. Whatever. Not

[07:13] going to listen." So, this is not a

[07:15] consequential

[07:16] position. the it's a position she's not

[07:19] qualified for, but it's inconsequential.

[07:22] I'd imagine in reality this is just for

[07:25] show, but I would guess the function of

[07:27] it. Maybe either President Trump just

[07:30] wants to genuinely honor Erica Kirk or

[07:33] there's a little bit about, you know,

[07:35] you scratch my back, I scratch yours, we

[07:37] want to position me in 2038 or 2042 to

[07:42] make a run for the whatever office. So,

[07:46] I need uh I need to start patting my

[07:48] resume because the reality TV shows

[07:53] don't qualify me. Well, actually, Trump

[07:56] might disagree with that. He had a

[07:58] reality TV show and he's won the

[08:01] presidential election two more like

[08:03] three times. So, but nonetheless, you

[08:06] get my point. What else are people

[08:08] saying? Uh really fun guy to follow on

[08:10] Twitter, the artist known as Jess. You

[08:13] can see his handle right here. This is

[08:15] for one purpose. Vet the academy for

[08:18] Israel shills. These Zionists need to be

[08:21] rooted out of our government and then

[08:23] expelled from our country. Uh I do

[08:26] believe uh there's a problem with

[08:29] Zionists. It's kind of like what Bill

[08:32] Gates

[08:33] like pro-vaxer like get them at all

[08:36] costs kind of people. I think in a few

[08:39] years we're going to look back at

[08:40] Zionist and be like, "Oh yeah, that wow.

[08:43] Wow." It took us a while to realize like

[08:47] un we're doing this for the greater good

[08:49] and God told us to uh we're going to

[08:52] look back at them and uh realize kind of

[08:55] like it was what team Bill Gates was

[08:58] during the pandemic. So we'll take a few

[09:01] years to get there. In the meantime,

[09:02] we're going to fight about it, but I

[09:04] think that's how it's going to play out.

[09:05] Okay. I think we need to credibly draw a

[09:08] distinction between Erica and Charlie.

[09:11] She isn't qualified to do everything he

[09:14] did just because she was his wife. Well,

[09:17] I agree with that. Now, something about

[09:19] Erica Kirk that went super viral on

[09:23] Twitter uh maybe a month ago. Let me

[09:25] check the date on this. Yeah, it was

[09:27] about a month ago, February 13th. And

[09:29] very viral. It's it's not flashy. It's a

[09:33] long read for a tweet yet really

[09:37] interesting, you know. So, 10 million

[09:38] views on this long tweet. Let's go

[09:41] through three paragraphs and shout out.

[09:43] This is Elizabeth Lane. She's an

[09:46] independent investigative journalist.

[09:48] So, for the people out there, which is

[09:52] honestly it's a growing number, who look

[09:54] at Erica Kirk with skepticism, this

[09:57] explains a lot of their thinking. Not

[10:00] everybody, but a lot of their thinking.

[10:01] And by the way, to say you're skeptical

[10:03] of Erica Kirk, that doesn't mean you

[10:06] need to go full like, "I've listened to

[10:08] everything Candace says and she's right

[10:10] about everything." You don't need to

[10:12] think that Erica like set Charlie up,

[10:15] though some people think that. uh it can

[10:18] just be like, "Wow, she seems

[10:21] really excited about this power that

[10:24] she's not qualified for." And she's

[10:28] denying that Charlie was saying Israel's

[10:32] he's afraid Israel is going to kill him.

[10:34] She's denying that uh he decided not to

[10:38] support Israel at all costs. And text

[10:41] messages prove that's what Charlie

[10:43] thought, felt, and was doing. and she's

[10:46] doing the opposite. So, you can be

[10:48] anywhere on that spectrum. Or you can

[10:50] just say, "Ah, she seems disingenuous. I

[10:53] don't like that." So, wherever you're

[10:55] at, there's a growing skepticism about

[10:57] Erica Kirk on that skepticism spectrum.

[11:01] We'll get back to the video in just a

[11:03] second, I promise. But here's a question

[11:05] for you. What if you found out that the

[11:07] medicine that actually saved millions

[11:10] during the pandemic was being made in

[11:12] China, the same place where the virus

[11:14] was made? Huh? But it's unfortunately

[11:17] true. 58% of the world's ivormectin

[11:20] supply is made in China and overall 75%

[11:24] is made in Asia. But luckily, not the

[11:27] wellness companies introducing

[11:30] Americanmade Ivormectin.

[11:32] Safe, trusted, and produced right here

[11:35] in the United States. Ivormectin has

[11:38] been prescribed globally for over 30

[11:41] years and even earned the Nobel Prize in

[11:44] medicine because it has a proven ability

[11:47] to eliminate parasites and improve

[11:49] overall health. And new research also

[11:51] points to potential benefits for skin,

[11:54] immune, and cancer support. Now, here's

[11:57] the thing. Ivormectin has been made hard

[11:59] to get for some reason. And if you can

[12:02] get it, mostarmacies charge $5 per

[12:05] tablet. But the wellness company is

[12:07] offering a higher 18 millgram dose for

[12:11] just $3.33.

[12:13] You'll get a sixmon supply designed for

[12:16] four 21-day cleanse cycles at an

[12:19] unbeatable price. My thought, support

[12:22] American medicine, not China's supply

[12:25] chain. Get your US-made ivormectin at

[12:29] twwc.health/jpreacts

[12:30] health/jpreacts

[12:33] and use promo code jpreacts to get $44

[12:37] off plus free shipping. That's

[12:39] twwc.health/jpreacts.

[12:43] Now, back to the video. Nonetheless,

[12:46] here's three paragraphs from Elizabeth's

[12:49] Lane's viral article. I'm going to be

[12:51] blunt. I've reached the point where I

[12:53] find Erica Kirk deeply disturbing. Not

[12:56] because of rumors or gossip because but

[12:58] because of consistent observable

[13:01] patterns of behavior. To be clear,

[13:03] everything I say at this point is my

[13:05] opinion. I'm not claiming this as a

[13:06] fact. Not saying this is what I think

[13:08] Erica Kirk is. Going down to the third

[13:11] paragraph. What stands out immediately

[13:13] is the reaction she provokes in people,

[13:15] which is very common with psychopaths

[13:18] across the board, including from people

[13:20] who support her publicly. The private

[13:22] reaction is the same. I can't watch her.

[13:25] Not criticism, just physical discomfort.

[13:28] People turn off interviews because the

[13:30] presentation feels artificial to the

[13:33] point of being unbearable. Let me

[13:35] explain. And she explains that kind of

[13:38] response does not happen accidentally.

[13:40] It does not happen often. Research in

[13:43] psychology shows that humans are highly

[13:45] sensitive to emotional inongruence,

[13:49] mismatches between facial expression,

[13:52] tone, and content.

[13:55] When effect appears simulated rather

[13:58] than genuine, the brain registers it as

[14:01] a threat signal. This activates

[14:04] discomfort and avoidance, even if the

[14:06] person cannot consciously explain why.

[14:10] So many of us felt this way, but we

[14:12] could not explain why we could not watch

[14:14] her. That's how I see Erica Kirk at the

[14:18] very least.

[14:19] suspicious of some other things, but the

[14:21] lack of congruence uh the uh seeming

[14:25] artificial display of emotion on command

[14:29] and then other times complete lack of

[14:31] emotion when she's running a Zoom call

[14:34] after the memorial service celebrating

[14:36] like yeah 200,000 in merch sales, 50,000

[14:39] hats, uh this many donations as like

[14:43] okay complete lack of emotion and then

[14:45] like well the emotion you we're

[14:48] displaying. It seems artificial and

[14:52] contrived. So, if you want to read the

[14:54] rest of Elizabeth Lane's opinion piece,

[14:58] you can look her up on Twitter. Now,

[15:00] something I came across recently and

[15:02] it's been verified. This actually is an

[15:05] authentic video. It's not AI. This is

[15:07] from, I believe, 2012 while she was Miss

[15:10] Arizona. And here's the inongruence. Of

[15:14] course, Erica is presented as

[15:16] conservative woman. Family is all that

[15:18] matters. Whatever. I'm going to work in

[15:21] this highowered job, but family is all

[15:22] that matters. And then you see things

[15:25] like this, her endorsing the p

[15:27] pornography industry. Now, it's possible

[15:30] like, well, she g that was 14 years ago.

[15:33] She grew up and changed her values. Of

[15:36] course, that's possible, and you'll see

[15:38] from her own words in a second. Or it's

[15:40] possible she still feels the same way as

[15:43] what you'll see in this video, but her

[15:46] words say something different. And

[15:49] that's one of the reasons, you know, her

[15:51] professed values versus her actual

[15:54] values. If there is an inongruence in

[15:58] there, then that can contribute to that

[16:01] primitive instinct feeling people get of

[16:04] like, it seems like something's off. She

[16:07] said those words, but something just

[16:09] didn't seem congruent about it. Anyway,

[16:12] here's her talking about respecting porn

[16:16] people.

[16:17] >> I have respect for the individuals that

[16:19] are in the pornography industry, not

[16:21] because they're degrading women or

[16:24] anything like that, but because that's

[16:26] their field and they are professionals.

[16:28] So, I give them credit for being able to

[16:31] have a job and make money and stimulate

[16:32] the economy that way. But I think that

[16:35] there needs to be a way to shield it

[16:37] from the overall overall public such as

[16:40] the kids.

[16:41] >> Yeah, you'd think at the very least

[16:43] shield it from kids. Now, I'm a guy who

[16:46] has I for the most part conservative

[16:49] values and uh I don't have the same

[16:52] stance as Erica Kirk. I have respect for

[16:55] people in the porn industry. No, here's

[16:57] here's my thought. I do not respect

[17:00] anybody in the porn industry. I do not

[17:02] respect the women. I do not respect the

[17:05] men. I think they're disrespecting

[17:06] themselves. I think they're probably

[17:08] broken inside. They probably have

[17:10] deep-seated, unresolved trauma. They

[17:13] probably use sexuality to validate

[17:15] themselves. I don't respect that. And I

[17:18] sure as heck don't respect the people

[17:20] that make it all happen and profit and

[17:22] organize it and degenerate the minds of

[17:26] young Americans with porn. I do not

[17:29] respect anything about porn. I don't

[17:32] respect anybody in porn, period. Now, I

[17:36] guess Erica Kirk and I just don't see

[17:39] eye to eye on that. And that's fine. We

[17:42] have different perspectives,

[17:44] but with Erica Kirk being switched into

[17:48] the role of CEO of Turning Point and

[17:51] other roles Charlie was set to take like

[17:53] this Air Force board and watching more

[17:56] and more of the public retract from

[17:59] Erica. You know what this reminds me of?

[18:03] when the Daily Wire's beloved star,

[18:05] Brett Cooper, I love her to death, was

[18:08] all of a sudden gone and switched out

[18:11] for Rean. So Brett Cooper left the Daily

[18:16] Wire and Daily Wire owned the YouTube

[18:18] channel that people who like her, you

[18:21] know, subscribe to massively.

[18:23] And uh one day Brett Cooper's gone, the

[18:26] people the the person that people loved.

[18:30] Then the next day, here's a replacement.

[18:33] And here's what happened. If you can

[18:35] see, just here's the channel when Brett

[18:37] Cooper was doing videos. Look at the

[18:40] video views. These are all very high.

[18:42] 361,1.1,432,

[18:47] 92,000. That was insanely low for Brett

[18:50] Cooper. 193,21,369,000.

[18:55] On average, well over a quarter million

[18:57] views per video. Now look at the views

[19:01] for the person Brett Cooper was switched

[19:04] out for. 7,000

[19:07] 9.4,000

[19:09] 11,000

[19:10] 6,000

[19:12] 7,000 9,000 6,000 12,000. The audience

[19:17] retracted from Rean. Doesn't mean she's

[19:19] bad. It's just like people who love

[19:22] Brett like I we don't resonate with her.

[19:26] A lot of people love Charlie. A lot of

[19:28] people are pulling back from Charlie's

[19:30] replacement, his wife. It's pretty

[19:34] factual. I'll show you a poll in just a

[19:36] second. But what I would dare say at the

[19:38] very least for Charlie's legacy, part of

[19:42] which is Turning Point USA, I think at

[19:45] this point it's become pretty

[19:48] objectively clear it's bad for Erica

[19:52] Kirk to be the head of it. And even if

[19:54] we just give it a pass, well, she

[19:56] doesn't have any bad intentions.

[19:58] I think the result of her being in that

[20:01] role is bad. There is so much

[20:04] retraction, people being repelled

[20:07] by their experience of Erica Kirk that

[20:10] is causing support for Turning Point USA

[20:13] to be retracted. And I don't think

[20:16] that's good for Charlie's legacy. I

[20:19] don't think that's good for the good

[20:21] that he intended for Turning Point USA

[20:24] to do. Now, I'm aware not everybody sees

[20:28] things the way I do. So, right before I

[20:30] started filming this video, I'm like,

[20:32] "All right, I'm seeing all the I don't

[20:34] see any supportive comments on these.

[20:36] You know, Erica Kirk is part of the Air

[20:39] Force board now. I don't see any

[20:41] supportive comments. Is it like I don't

[20:44] know. Is it just me?" Uh, and I don't

[20:48] want to be so close-minded that I think,

[20:50] well, I think this way, therefore, I

[20:51] think everybody else thinks this way.

[20:53] So, I put up a simple non-leading poll

[20:56] on Twitter literally 15 20 minutes ago

[21:00] before I started this video. Uh, so far,

[21:04] uh, there's 688 votes, which is great.

[21:08] That's a decent amount of people. Yet,

[21:11] it's just been up for 15 20 minutes.

[21:13] We'll see how the poll evolves. You can

[21:15] check back on my Twitter if you'd like.

[21:17] Uh here's the question. I wanted it to

[21:19] be mis not misleading whatsoever. Just

[21:22] like what what do you think? Here it is.

[21:25] Does something seem weird about Erica

[21:27] Kirk to you? No or yes. Here are the

[21:32] results so far. No. 26.5%.

[21:36] Yes. 73.5%.

[21:40] Doing a little rounding. That's 3/4 of

[21:43] people think there's something weird

[21:45] with Erica Kirk. One quarter of people

[21:49] don't think there's anything wrong with

[21:50] Erica Kirk. Nothing weird about her. And

[21:54] I think that's just interesting intel.

[21:56] You'll see people still there's I mean

[21:59] mob attacks. If you post anything

[22:02] skeptical about Erica Kirk happens to me

[22:04] all the time. I'm sure. In fact, I'll

[22:06] look at the comments here in just a

[22:08] second on this post. But there people

[22:10] will attack you if you're skeptical of

[22:12] Erica Kirk. And similar to people who

[22:16] were all about free speech, how they'd

[22:18] get attacked for misinformation or if

[22:21] you were skeptical about vaccines, you'd

[22:24] get attacked.

[22:26] And it can almost make you think like,

[22:27] "Wow, I am in the minority. Look how

[22:30] viciously I'm being attacked for my

[22:34] point of view." But we can look back

[22:35] over the past few years and realize

[22:37] we're we're in the majority all along

[22:40] based on this Twitter poll that now has

[22:42] not 688 votes but 799.

[22:45] That was now more skepticism of Erica

[22:48] Kirk. Uh we can see if you're

[22:51] objectively if you think something is

[22:53] weird about her, you are literally in

[22:56] the majority. You are in the 3/4

[22:59] majority. 75.1%

[23:03] to 24.9%.

[23:05] You're in the majority. Doesn't mean

[23:08] you're right. It just means you're in

[23:10] the majority of how you see the

[23:12] situation. I've just populated the

[23:14] comments. So, let's see if anybody's

[23:16] attacking me yet. The whole thing just

[23:17] rubs most people the wrong way. It seems

[23:19] those memes of her grieving were brutal.

[23:22] Yeah, she's been off-putting to me since

[23:24] after her first speech post Charlie's

[23:26] death. Uh, she's not a grieving widow.

[23:30] She's a trophy widow. She takes the W's

[23:32] that comes with that. Jesus swept. If

[23:35] you answered no to this poll, you are

[23:37] most definitely vaccinated. Kind of like

[23:40] kind of in line with my analogy a second

[23:44] ago. Yes, she seems like a fake spy who

[23:47] set up a relationship with Charlie as

[23:50] Yeah. Okay. Fake spy.

[23:53] Which one? The original one or the new

[23:54] one who joined after the SCOP?

[23:57] Uh, yes. People's obsession with her is

[24:00] very weird. Nope. I think she just

[24:03] really likes Top Gun. It's a joke about

[24:05] the Air Force, I'd imagine. Now, before

[24:08] we close out this discussion about how I

[24:11] do believe things got even worse for

[24:13] Erica Kirk, seemingly the more spotlight

[24:16] that's on her, the worse things get,

[24:18] which might mean she's not the person to

[24:20] put in the spotlight. So, we'll close

[24:23] out by sharing a quick few seconds of

[24:27] Tim Dylan and his thoughts on Erica

[24:30] Kirk.

[24:31] >> You know, three weeks after the guy's

[24:33] dead, she's out there with sparklers.

[24:35] You know, they're doing circus Olay.

[24:37] Something's off. Something's weird.

[24:41] Now we find out like

[24:44] the wife is it's beyond weird. It's

[24:47] creepy.

[24:49] And there's a very good chance that this

[24:52] woman was his handler. Who knows if any

[24:54] of that's true, but we do know Tim Dylan

[24:57] said it. A lot of people are thinking

[25:00] things like that. With that said, let me

[25:02] know what you think about Erica Kirk and

[25:04] her weirdness or lack thereof in the

[25:08] comments below. And I'll look forward to

[25:09] seeing you on our next video. Till then,

[25:12] stay free.