Lauren Boebert’s Bill BANNING Defense Manufacturers From Boycotting Israel Passes House!

[00:00] The US Congress is trying to make it so

[00:02] that in order for American weapons

[00:04] manufacturers to supply weapons to the

[00:07] US military, they must also supply

[00:09] weapons to Israel by law.

[00:13] Welcome to the Jimmy Door Show,

[00:14] everybody. Katon and Russ from Dissident

[00:17] here while Jimmy is on the road. All

[00:20] right, folks. So, with everything going

[00:23] on with all of the uh shock and horror

[00:26] of the past week, uh this slipped

[00:30] through the news here. James Lee is on

[00:32] the case. Pay attention, folks. While we

[00:34] were all distracted, the House just

[00:36] passed a bill to make it illegal for US

[00:38] defense contractors to boycott Israel.

[00:42] Read that again. American weapons

[00:45] manufacturers will now be legally bound

[00:48] to keep arming Israel by order of

[00:51] Congress. WTF? You know, if there's one

[00:54] group of people I hate to see pushed

[00:55] around in this way. It's American

[00:57] weapons.

[00:58] You know, I hate to see them bullied in

[01:01] this way. This really gets my blood.

[01:03] >> It's terrible.

[01:04] >> Here's James Lee.

[01:06] >> Distract us from in the last couple

[01:08] days. Well, it's this right here. The

[01:10] House of Representatives just passed a

[01:12] bill punishing quote politically

[01:14] motivated boycots of Israel. Quote, "In

[01:17] a first step towards a federal law

[01:19] punishing criticism of Israel, the House

[01:21] of Representatives on Wednesday, that

[01:24] was 9/11, mind you, passed a massive

[01:26] defense budget that would bar companies

[01:28] engage in politically motivated boycots

[01:30] of the country from Pentagon contracts."

[01:33] The bill would effectively ban

[01:34] contractors boycotting Israel from

[01:36] tapping most federal contract dollars

[01:38] since more than half of the $755 billion

[01:41] in the US government spent on contracts

[01:43] last year flowed through the defense

[01:45] department. All right, so in more plain

[01:46] English, the US Congress is trying to

[01:49] make it so that in order for American

[01:51] weapons manufacturers to supply weapons

[01:54] to the US military, they must also

[01:57] supply weapons to Israel by law. What

[02:00] the is that all about? I also just want

[02:02] to reiterate again that Israel had

[02:04] nothing to do with the assassination of

[02:07] Charlie Kirk.

[02:08] >> Okay.

[02:09] >> Yeah, that is so bizarre that I mean you

[02:11] talk about overcompensating for

[02:13] something that you would tweet out a

[02:15] picture of yourself and Charlie Kirk

[02:19] with the Israeli flag in the background.

[02:22] I mean, talk about, you know, Lady Doth

[02:24] protest too much, man. I don't know. He

[02:26] should have tweeted out a video that

[02:28] video of him at the baseball game after

[02:30] after the uh

[02:31] >> associate. Yeah. Doing the YMCA.

[02:33] >> Looked like he was Yeah. He was having a

[02:34] great time.

[02:36] >> Yeah. Right. That's his his morning

[02:37] process.

[02:38] >> Oh, that's right. I got to look sad.

[02:39] That's right.

[02:40] >> That's right. The House just passed a

[02:43] bill punishing politically motivated

[02:45] boycots of Israel. In a first step

[02:48] toward a federal law punishing criticism

[02:50] of Israel, the House of Representatives

[02:52] on Wednesday passed a massive defense

[02:54] budget that would bar companies engaged

[02:56] in politically motivated boycotts of the

[02:59] country from Pentagon contracts. The

[03:01] bill would effectively ban contractors

[03:03] boycotting Israel from tapping most

[03:05] federal contract dollars since more than

[03:08] half of the 755 billion the US

[03:11] government spent on contracts last year

[03:13] flowed through the defense department.

[03:15] That's now the War Department. I will

[03:17] have to issue that correction. It's

[03:19] 2025. Get with the times. The ban, the

[03:22] latest legislative attempt to target the

[03:23] boycott, dive investment, and sanctions

[03:25] movement against Israel's human rights

[03:27] violations or BDS, would still have to

[03:29] pass the Senate. The upper chamber,

[03:31] well, not if Chuck Schumer has anything

[03:33] to say about it. The upper chamber was

[03:35] debating its own version of the budget

[03:37] bill on Thursday that does not include

[03:39] an anti-BDS provision. Critics predict a

[03:42] court challenge if the anti-boycott

[03:44] provision makes it into law. This

[03:46] amendment is really designed to shield

[03:48] Israel from any accountability by

[03:50] penalizing those who protest its

[03:52] violations of Palestinian human rights

[03:54] through boycots, which should be

[03:56] protected by the First Amendment, said

[03:58] Hassan El Taab, the legislative director

[04:00] for Middle East policy at the Friends

[04:02] Committee on National Legislation. The

[04:05] anti-BDS provision was spearheaded by

[04:07] Representative Lauren Boowart from

[04:09] Colorado, whose office did not respond

[04:12] to a request for comment. Boowbert's

[04:14] measure received no discussion when it

[04:16] was approved by the House on a voice

[04:18] vote as part of a package of amendments

[04:20] to the budget bill Tuesday. The House

[04:23] went on to pass the full amended version

[04:25] of the National Defense Authorization

[04:27] Act on Wednesday night. The overall bill

[04:30] passed 237 to 196 with support from 214

[04:35] Republicans and 17 Democrats. El Taab

[04:39] said that passing the anti-boycott

[04:41] provision in such a rush manner did a

[04:43] real disservice to the American people,

[04:45] especially people who were engaged in

[04:47] protesting and unfolding genocide going

[04:49] on in Gaza. Bills targeting the BDS

[04:52] movement have passed many state

[04:53] legislatores. Of course, some seek to

[04:56] bar people or companies supporting BDS

[04:58] from winning government contracts,

[05:00] leading critics of the laws to argue

[05:02] that they violate the First Amendment's

[05:04] guarantee of free speech by punishing

[05:07] political views. President Trump signed

[05:10] an executive order targeting the boycott

[05:12] movement during his first term in 2019,

[05:15] which he restored in January after his

[05:17] reelection. ProPalestine activists have

[05:20] been a major target of his ongoing

[05:22] crackdown on universities and

[05:24] immigrants. Existing federal law takes

[05:26] aim at companies who observe Arab

[05:28] countries boycott of Israel. Earlier

[05:32] this year, however, pro-Israel lawmakers

[05:34] sought to criminally penalize anyone who

[05:36] boycotted companies that the United

[05:38] Nations has identified as doing business

[05:40] in illegal Israeli settlements in the

[05:42] occupied West Bank. That was the big

[05:45] boycott bill. That was the probably the

[05:47] scariest one of them all. And here's the

[05:49] kicker. The bill uh floundered, I'm

[05:52] assuming that was a typo, in the face of

[05:54] opposition from Representative Marjorie

[05:57] Taylor Green of Georgia and conservative

[06:01] activists. Now, here's where this

[06:03] becomes a very bitter thing. One of

[06:05] these conservative activists, as

[06:07] Blakeley points out, was now the late

[06:10] Charlie Kirk. What's particularly sick

[06:12] about them sneaking that

[06:13] unconstitutional anti-boycott bill

[06:16] through using Charlie Kirk's death as a

[06:18] distraction is that back in May when

[06:20] they tried to pass it the first time,

[06:22] Kirk tweeted against it. Of course,

[06:24] Zionist lunatic Mark Leven had a

[06:27] meltdown. So yes, this was the piece uh

[06:29] that the article mentions the

[06:32] anti-boycott bill which would prohibit

[06:35] ordinary people from participating in

[06:37] boycots endorsed by international

[06:40] organizations uh like for example the

[06:43] United Nations. Uh so this was Charlie

[06:46] Kirk on May 4th of this year. Tomorrow,

[06:48] the House will vote on HR867,

[06:51] a bill that will criminalize private

[06:53] boycots of Israel, fines up to $1

[06:56] million in prison time up to 20 years.

[06:58] Bills like this only create more

[07:00] anti-semitism and play into growing

[07:03] narratives that Israel is running the US

[07:05] government. In America, you are allowed

[07:07] to hold differing views. You are allowed

[07:10] to disagree and protest. We've allowed

[07:12] far too many people who hate America to

[07:16] uh move here from abroad, but the right

[07:18] to speak freely is the birthright of all

[07:20] Americans. This bill should not pass.

[07:23] Any Republican that votes for this bill

[07:26] will expose themselves. We will be

[07:29] watching very closely. That's Charlie

[07:31] Kirk in May. To which Mark Leavin says,

[07:34] "You don't know who you're talking

[07:35] about, Charlie." Bill Garly extends the

[07:38] anti-boycott Act of 2018 signed by

[07:40] President Trump to international

[07:42] organizations. Yes, he know. I'm sure he

[07:44] knew that. Everybody knew that. Yes.

[07:47] What causes anti-semitism is

[07:49] anti-semites, bigot,

[07:51] >> Jew haters.

[07:52] >> They don't need excuses. As you state

[07:54] here,

[07:55] >> your post is absurd.

[07:59] >> Yeah. Syrian girl says they didn't even

[08:01] wait till his body was cold. Yeah, that

[08:04] is what makes this kind of extra scummy.

[08:07] Granted, it was not the exact same bill,

[08:09] but to pass an anti-BDS bill under the

[08:13] cover of the tragic uh horrible murder

[08:18] of Charlie Kirk, um when he was, you

[08:22] know, to his credit, you know, it's no

[08:24] secret. I didn't agree with Charlie Kirk

[08:26] on much, but to to his credit, um you

[08:29] know, he did oppose that boycott bill.

[08:31] And I think that, you know, that that

[08:34] activism, that pressure is probably a

[08:37] large part of what sank it. That got

[08:38] enough Republicans who were responsive

[08:41] to that faction of the base to vocalize

[08:44] their opposition to it. Massie voices

[08:47] opposition to it, Marjorie Taylor Green.

[08:49] And uh it didn't even make it to the

[08:51] floor. And so yeah, just just it makes

[08:54] it just extra scummy that they did this

[08:56] this week for that reason.

[08:58] >> Yeah. Well, they're not going to waste

[09:00] uh an opportunity to push their agenda

[09:03] just like they didn't after 9/11. Why do

[09:06] you think they had the Patriot Act ready

[09:07] to go so quick? Cuz that was Dick

[09:10] Cheny's wish list that had been sitting

[09:12] at the bottom of a drawer since the

[09:14] Nixon administration. They had that

[09:17] written up, ready to go. Soon as 911

[09:19] happened, boom, they brought it to

[09:21] Congress. Charlie Kirk, this happened.

[09:24] They know there's a lot of emotion. And

[09:26] when people are very emotional, they're

[09:28] very easy to manipulate,

[09:30] they're going to take this opportunity

[09:32] to try to push through a bunch of stuff

[09:35] that uh they think people might be

[09:39] distracted enough to let them get away

[09:41] with that not only have nothing to do

[09:44] with Charlie Kirk, but that as you see

[09:46] there, he actively opposed and they'll

[09:49] try to use his name. Look what Netanyahu

[09:51] has done trying to trying to curl up to

[09:55] his memory when Max has been doing a lot

[09:58] of reporting. He just dropped another

[10:00] banger about how Charlie Kirk was

[10:04] starting to go kind of, you know, assert

[10:08] that part, the kind of Marjorie Taylor

[10:10] Green kind of American nationalism of,

[10:13] hey, why are we involved in this? Why do

[10:16] we allow these people to have this much

[10:18] power over our foreign policy? Now, we

[10:21] don't know what happened. I think to

[10:23] believe the story that's coming out of

[10:26] coming out of the White House right now,

[10:28] particularly with the developments with

[10:30] the manifesto that used to exist but

[10:32] doesn't exist, and other people are

[10:35] cooperating. He's not cooperating. And

[10:37] the gun that could be broken down and

[10:39] then put back together. If you believe

[10:41] what they're telling you about how this

[10:43] happened, I I don't know what to tell

[10:44] you. Um, it's pretty clearly uh some

[10:49] kind of cover up. It's very clearly for

[10:52] whatever reason. We don't know for sure.

[10:56] We have our suspicions. Um, they want to

[10:59] misdirect people away from what actually

[11:01] happened here. Now, you look at who had

[11:04] a motive. A lot of people are looking at

[11:07] Israel, ourselves included. There's good

[11:09] reason to believe that. What you can't

[11:12] uh deny is that there's some very solid

[11:16] reporting and we can see the evidence in

[11:19] tweets like that. Remember Charlie Kirk

[11:21] was a young guy, man. He was not an old

[11:23] guy set in his ways. There was a lot of

[11:25] room for him to evolve and particularly

[11:28] given that his generational cohort among

[11:31] Republicans is extremely skeptical of

[11:34] the Zionist project that he was going to

[11:37] go that way and that was going to be a

[11:38] nightmare for him. He was not just

[11:40] another schmuck talking on a mic. He had

[11:43] a national organization that if Charlie

[11:47] Kirk had turned around and you know,

[11:50] let's not get it twisted. People have

[11:51] pointed out very recently he was denying

[11:54] that there was starvation in Gaza. I

[11:57] mean, he hadn't fully flipped, but he

[12:01] was starting to show some independence.

[12:02] And when you're talking about somebody

[12:04] that young, you don't know how that

[12:07] could go. And if he had gone that way,

[12:09] if Charlie Kirk had put the thumbs down

[12:13] on the Zionist project, that would have

[12:16] been a major major tipping point within

[12:19] the entire right-wing coalition. Like

[12:21] you couldn't have really at that point,

[12:23] the Zionist among them would have been

[12:26] fringe. Like they they wouldn't have

[12:28] even represented or been able to

[12:31] represent themselves as the mainstream

[12:33] of the party. I don't think they're the

[12:35] mainstream of the party now, but that

[12:37] would have made it just completely

[12:41] unquestionable that they had been pushed

[12:43] to the margins.

[12:44] >> Yeah. On the boycott score, there does

[12:47] seem to be some encouraging news. Uh

[12:50] this bill is up for a hearing on

[12:52] Wednesday, so I don't think it's certain

[12:54] yet, but Sam Husseini reported it. He's

[12:56] pretty solid. um that the uh Marco Rubio

[13:00] passport revocation powers for Israel

[13:03] critics has been stripped uh from this

[13:06] upcoming bill that they're going to be

[13:09] uh tableabling on Wednesday. So, you

[13:11] know, it seems I mean, look, this is

[13:13] tied to the NDAA. It's a defense

[13:16] department thing. Ultimately, they got

[13:18] to get that money approved, right? The

[13:21] war machine must be fed. So, this is

[13:24] probably one of those areas where you

[13:25] can jam it through. uh because there's

[13:27] enough bipartisan support. But

[13:29] thankfully, knock on wood, for the time

[13:30] being, there seems to be barely barely

[13:35] enough opposition to these really uh

[13:39] just like draconian speech crackdown

[13:41] bills to the point where they seem to be

[13:45] failing. Like Lawler's anti-boycott bill

[13:48] failed largely thanks to the pressure of

[13:52] guys like Charlie Kirk and Thomas Massie

[13:55] and Marjorie Taylor Green. And there

[13:56] seems to be just enough of that in the

[13:59] Republican coalition and just a small

[14:02] enough coalition. I mean, this is the

[14:03] other thing. You got to be grateful they

[14:06] only have a slim majority because if

[14:09] they had a bigger majority, then you

[14:11] know, these uh desenters would would be

[14:15] flooded out. Um, but balance of power

[14:18] being what it is, there seems to be just

[14:21] barely enough opposition to the worst of

[14:24] these bills, which is a good sign

[14:26] because 5 years ago, there'd have been

[14:28] none. There would have been none.

[14:29] >> Sure.

[14:31] >> Hey, the cost of everything is still out

[14:33] of control. And many of us are relying

[14:34] on credit cards to cover essentials. If

[14:37] that debt is piling up, you're not

[14:38] alone. Americans collectively owe over a

[14:40] trillion dollars in credit card debt.

[14:42] You might have considered reaching out

[14:44] to my friends at American Financing, but

[14:46] hesitated because you don't want to give

[14:48] up your low mortgage rate. Well, there's

[14:50] good news. They've created the Smart

[14:51] Equity Loan. It's a solution designed to

[14:54] help you take control of your finances

[14:55] without touching your current mortgage.

[14:58] Unlike a HELOC, which can have varied

[15:00] interest rates, the Smart Equity Loan

[15:02] offers a fixed rate. That means one

[15:04] predictable monthly payment, giving you

[15:06] peace of mind. This loan allows you to

[15:08] leverage your equity in your home to pay

[15:10] off highinterest debt, free up your cash

[15:12] flow, and keep your existing low

[15:15] mortgage rate intact. It only takes 10

[15:17] minutes to get started with no upfront

[15:19] or hidden fees. Call American Financing

[15:21] today and start saving now. That's

[15:23] 8884303.

[15:26] That's 8884303.

[15:29] Or visit americanfinancing.net/jimmy.

[15:35] Come see me on tour in Louisville, Fort

[15:37] Wayne, Hermosa Beach, Sacramento, San

[15:39] Francisco. Go to jimmy.com for a link

[15:41] for tickets.

[15:42] [Music]