Michael Knowles and Charlie Kirk Play the Yes or No Game: Death Penalty, Porn, and Putin

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Warns Tucker Carlson About the Coming Economic Revolt Among Gen Z Americans

Charlie Kirk Warns Tucker Carlson About the Coming Economic Revolt Among Gen Z Americans

2:13:52

Newt Gingrich on Trump's Historic Speed and the Remaking of American Foreign Policy Under Marco Rubio

Newt Gingrich on Trump's Historic Speed and the Remaking of American Foreign Policy Under Marco Rubio

15:55

Charlie Kirk and Jack Hibbs Expose the Great Reset and the Global Agenda Behind America's Dismantling

Charlie Kirk and Jack Hibbs Expose the Great Reset and the Global Agenda Behind America's Dismantling

20:05

Michael Knowles and Charlie Kirk Play the Yes or No Game: Death Penalty, Porn, and Putin

Michael Knowles sits down with Charlie Kirk for an unfiltered round of the Yes or No game, tackling everything from McCarthyism to the death penalty, pornography bans, and whether they'd rather play the game with Vladimir Putin or Volodymyr Zelensky. The conversation takes unexpected turns through British politics, AI demons, testosterone levels, and whether Princess Diana was taken out by the British establishment. Along the way, they agree on nearly everything except teacher salaries and whether tall people make better politicians, a debate they promise to revisit.

Categories: Interviews
June 17, 2023

The Yes or No Game with a Political Giant

Michael Knowles introduces his guest for this installment of the Yes or No game: Charlie Kirk, described as both a giant of politics and literally a very tall man. The conversation immediately takes a humorous turn when Knowles mentions a Reddit thread questioning whether Charlie might be part of the Nephilim, to which Kirk responds with appropriate skepticism.

As they settle in with their respective beverages—Knowles with a martini, Kirk with coffee—they prepare to tackle some of the most controversial questions in American politics and culture. The format is simple: Knowles guesses how Kirk will answer, and if he's right, Kirk drinks. If he's wrong, Knowles drinks. What follows is a revealing conversation that touches on everything from the nature of political leadership to the corruption of American foreign policy.

Short Men and Political Power

The first question sets the tone: are short men worse at politics? Kirk immediately agrees, though both acknowledge exceptions exist. The conversation reveals an interesting pattern: while taller candidates generally win presidential elections, many successful senators and congressmen are considerably shorter. Kirk admits he generally doesn't trust short people in power, though he quickly names exceptions like Ron DeSantis and Rand Paul.

The discussion touches on the phenomenon of height in politics, with Knowles noting that senators tend to be shorter than the average president, while Kirk observes that some politicians can be too tall, citing Glenn Youngkin and the notoriously towering James Comey as examples.

McCarthyism and the Rehabilitation of Joe McCarthy

When asked whether we gave McCarthyism a bad rap, both men enthusiastically agree that Senator Joe McCarthy was right. Kirk quotes William F. Buckley Jr., noting that McCarthyism was "a political movement around which all Americans of stern moral fiber can rally." They agree that McCarthy's targets in Hollywood and government were actually communists, and that intelligence agencies deliberately turned McCarthyism into a slur.

Knowles adds that McCarthy successfully identified Alger Hiss, one of the founders of the United Nations, as a communist agent. Kirk concludes that McCarthy "burned too bright for our age" and calls him a good man from Wisconsin.

White Supremacists and Federal Agents

On the question of whether 95% of all white supremacists are actually undercover federal agents, both men immediately agree. Kirk jokes that the other 5% are Indian or Hispanic, highlighting what they see as the manufactured nature of the white supremacist threat in modern America.

OnlyFans and the Pornography Crisis

The conversation takes a serious turn when discussing whether producing and distributing OnlyFans content should be banned with criminal consequences. After some clarification about the scope of the question, both men ultimately agree that it should be, though Kirk notes he would target other forms of pornography first.

Knowles describes OnlyFans as particularly insidious because young women at 18—not known for making wise decisions—can quickly create content that will follow them forever, even if they quit after two months. He characterizes the entire system as "degenerate men preying on vulnerable gullible women" where "everyone is degraded."

Kirk shifts the conversation to pornography more broadly, calling it "a tumor on society." He discusses how he wishes it had been harder for him to access pornography as a young person, noting that the median age of exposure is around 11 years old. Knowles makes a striking comparison: if 90% of society were hooked on opium delivered through their phones, melting their brains and making them view people as objects to be used, it would obviously have political effects.

Kirk goes further, suggesting that most depression in young men stems from dopamine deprivation caused by pornographic addiction. He references Gary Wilson's book "Your Brain on Porn," noting that Wilson documented how pornography causes issues across the board with male self-confidence, suicide, depression, and anxiety. He adds that female pornography habits are actually increasing.

Both men agree that laws should make it harder to do things without redemptive or edifying value, noting that the United States jailed pornographers for obscenity until very recently, including during the Bush administration.

The Death Penalty Debate

Kirk reveals this is his most unclear political position. He used to be very against the death penalty, particularly concerned about executing the wrong person. However, he acknowledges the biblical case is clear: the Bible is 100% supportive of the death penalty, from the Old Testament's "life for a life" principle to the execution requirements in Exodus.

Knowles notes that Catholic teaching for nearly 2,000 years supported the death penalty, including popes who carried it out. He cites Blessed Pius IX, who refused a stay of execution for the last criminal executed in the Papal States, saying "we cannot do it and we do not want to." The biblical foundation in Genesis establishes that the death penalty actually defends human dignity rather than undermining it.

However, Kirk makes a crucial practical argument: in current America, he opposes the death penalty because "this current government will use any power we give them against us." He draws a parallel to the Patriot Act, arguing that while the moral case is sound, the practical reality is that a corrupt government cannot be trusted with such power. Knowles suggests that once actual Bolsheviks take over, they'll eagerly use execution against their political enemies.

Putin Versus Zelenskyy

When asked whether he'd rather play the Yes or No game with Vladimir Putin or Volodymyr Zelensky, Kirk immediately chooses Putin, describing Zelenskyy as "the most uppity Ford in a T-shirt"—a phrase he credits to Tucker Carlson.

This launches into a broader discussion of Ukraine. Kirk emphasizes that Putin is "not a good guy" and "a thug," but argues the West has always done deals with thugs. He calls the current Ukraine situation "one of the great cons pulled on the American people," questioning why America is giving dollars to what he calls "this failed project."

Kirk argues that Ukraine as currently constituted is "a fake country," with eastern Ukraine being ethnically and linguistically Russian. He references serious American statesmen from the 1990s, including conservatives, who warned that NATO expansion eastward would antagonize Russia and increase the prospects for war. He compares the situation to the Cuban Missile Crisis, asking how America would react if Russia or China had similar involvement in Mexico.

Knowles notes that the director of the CIA arriving in Kiev two weeks after the Maidan revolution "may have had a little bit of support from the totally Democratic Grassroots." Kirk emphasizes that people underestimate how much social issues play into the conflict, calling it "a proxy war for LGBT versus antiquity." He explains that both Moscow and Brussels use social positioning to rally funding and troops, with Russia positioning itself as defending traditional values against Western degeneracy.

The conversation turns to the consequences of the Ukraine policy. Kirk warns that Russia, China, and India are meeting in St. Petersburg to create a currency to destabilize the dollar. If the U.S. loses global reserve currency status, the 110% debt-to-GDP ratio becomes catastrophic, potentially causing 30% inflation as dollars held as reserves flood back into the American economy.

Climate Change and the Sun

Both men lean toward agreeing that climate change is caused by the sun and has nothing to do with human activity, though they acknowledge the question is too absolute. Kirk notes it could be weather patterns or natural geological phenomena. Knowles points out the absurdity of the liberal idea that until about 1968, the climate was totally static, and then suddenly started changing—coincidentally right when it became politically useful to claim it was changing.

Kirk emphasizes that "carbon is life" and that everything that matters is built on carbon. Knowles identifies the core issue: climate activists don't like humans. They believe nature untouched is ideal, but nature untouched is not moral, orderly, or personal—God is all those things. This represents a return to river civilizations that worshiped created things rather than the Creator, which the Bible calls idolatry.

Women, Men, and Depth

The question of whether women are more shallow than men produces an interesting discussion about different types of depth. Kirk references Dennis Prager's observation that radio calls about the stock market, economics, or sports come entirely from men, while calls about relationships, divorce, or personal matters come entirely from women.

Knowles describes the Pietà—Michelangelo's sculpture of Mary holding the crucified Christ—as an example of profound female depth in the personal and immediate. Kirk contrasts this with Michelangelo's Moses looking up to heaven, representing male depth in the abstract and visionary.

They conclude that women are deeper on the micro level while men are deeper on the macro level. This explains why men come home from work and answer "how was work?" with "fine"—the details are too micro and immediate for male processing. Meanwhile, men think about grand visions like retaking Constantinople while women replay conversations in their heads. Both types of depth are equally important.

Target, Tom Cruise, and Testosterone

Kirk confirms his wife has completely stopped shopping at Target following the company's embrace of transgender ideology aimed at children. He explains the sacrifice: even though Target has the best variety and sometimes price on Spindrift, which he lives on, "these are sacrifices we have to make." He notes people have been called to make bigger sacrifices, and Target is "validly doubling down on transing the kids."

Both men enthusiastically agree that Tom Cruise was right about treating mental health issues with prescription drugs. Kirk argues that benzos and SSRIs are destroying young people's lives, and that society is massively over-medicating. The vast majority of depression diagnoses cannot be proven through chemistry—they're about brain health, nutrition, vitamin D levels, exercise, and dopamine habits.

Knowles praises Cruise as "truly the last" great movie star and "a marvelous film actor" who is pro-American. He notes the hypocrisy of mocking Cruise for Scientology while Hollywood embraces crystals, Reiki, and literal Satanism. Kirk suggests the real reason for attacks on Cruise is his criticism of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson.

On testosterone levels, both agree the catastrophic drop over the past 50 years results from a plot to feminize men and make the population more easily controlled. The solution: go to the gym, do cold plunges at 35-45 degrees, and stop touching receipts.

AI Demons and Princess Diana

Both men immediately agree it's possible that interacting with AI means interacting with real demons. The question receives no elaboration but complete agreement.

On Princess Diana, Knowles initially seems to disagree because he believes the British Monarchy was destroyed after James II was unjustly routed out and William and Mary took over. However, when the question is clarified to focus on the circumstances of Diana's death rather than her impact on the monarchy, Knowles shares a story about a security professional who told him, "I don't like coincidences." He confirms there's definitely more to Diana's death, though the motive remains unknown.

Instagram and Character Assessment

The final question asks whether you'd find out more about somebody by looking at their Instagram discovery page than going to lunch with them. After clarification that the question means having access to someone else's discovery page, both men agree a lunch date would tell you more.

However, Knowles acknowledges the algorithm is remarkably good. His discovery page shows only three things: watches and horology, memes, and music (guitar and piano). The algorithm has gotten sophisticated enough to show him musical jokes and guitar memes. He likes to think there's more to his personality than keeping time, playing music, and laughing, though he admits Instagram might know him better than he thinks.

Kirk reveals he doesn't have access to any of his social media accounts—his entire team manages them. If he wants to tweet something, he tells them what to say. He doesn't use Instagram frequently, doesn't have TikTok, and rarely uses Facebook except to contact people. He gave up Twitter after the 2020 election, unable to deal with it anymore.

Conclusion

The conversation reveals that Knowles and Kirk agree on virtually everything except the nuances of teacher salaries and the death penalty in practice versus theory. They promise to return for a dedicated discussion on whether tall people make better politicians—a question that clearly deserves deeper exploration. Until then, they've demonstrated that the Yes or No game can reveal more about political philosophy than a hundred policy papers.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!