2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Vivek Ramaswamy Explains Why Character Concerns Should Not Outweigh Trump's Record on Wars and Economy
A college student at the University of Pittsburgh tells Vivek Ramaswamy he supports him but cannot morally vote for Trump due to character concerns, despite agreeing with Trump's policies. Ramaswamy delivers a direct response: voters are choosing a president, not a priest, and Trump's four-year record of avoiding World War III, controlling inflation, and securing borders speaks louder than rhetoric. He argues that by 2028, when this student graduates, job prospects will depend entirely on whether Trump or Kamala Harris shapes the next four years. The exchange highlights a common dilemma among young voters torn between policy agreement and personal distaste for Trump's style.
During a campus appearance at the University of Pittsburgh, Vivek Ramaswamy fielded a question from a student who expressed deep admiration for him but serious reservations about Donald Trump. The student, a self-described Republican-leaning voter set to graduate in 2028, explained that while he agreed with nearly all of Trump's policies, he could not reconcile voting for someone whose rhetoric and treatment of women and other groups troubled him morally. Unable to support either Trump or Kamala Harris, the student asked Ramaswamy to make the case for why he should vote for Trump.
Vote for the President, Not the Priest
Ramaswamy's response was blunt and pragmatic. He reminded the student that voters are not selecting a spiritual leader, a father figure, or a moral exemplar—they are choosing a president whose job is to improve their lives. Ramaswamy pointed to the rarity of having a controlled experiment in American politics, noting that Trump's first term provides a clear benchmark against which to measure the current administration.
During Trump's four years, Ramaswamy argued, the country stayed out of major conflicts with North Korea, Iran, and Russia, avoiding the kind of entanglements that could send the next generation into war. He emphasized that it would be this student's generation—the one currently carrying backpacks filled with books—that would be called upon to fight if the United States entered another large-scale conflict. Under Trump, the economy grew, inflation remained low, wages increased, and illegal immigration was controlled.
The Biden-Harris Record
By contrast, Ramaswamy described the Biden administration—which he characterized as effectively a Biden-Harris administration—as marked by open borders, mass illegal migration on a historic scale, stagnant wages despite rising costs, and the closest proximity to World War III that he had witnessed in his lifetime. The implication was clear: the consequences of leadership extend far beyond uncomfortable soundbites.
Agreement Is Not Required
Ramaswamy acknowledged that he does not agree with everything Trump says, just as he does not agree with everything anyone says, including the student or even Charlie Kirk. Perfect alignment is not the standard by which voters should judge a candidate. The question is simpler: who will make your life better?
He turned the conversation to the student's future, pointing out that by the time he graduates in 2028, his ability to secure a high-paying, stable job will be directly influenced by who occupies the White House over the next four years. Ramaswamy argued that a Trump presidency offers a far better economic outlook than a Harris administration.
Voting for Thousands, Not One
Ramaswamy then broadened the scope of the decision. Voters are not simply choosing between Trump and Kamala Harris as individuals—they are choosing between the thousands of people each candidate will appoint to run the federal government. He posed the question: would the student prefer an administration staffed by people like himself, or by people like Tony Fauci? The choice, he suggested, is about direction, not personality.
What Matters in 20 Years?
Finally, Ramaswamy asked the student to consider a long-term perspective. Twenty years from now, what will matter more—the wars a president prevented, or the things that president said while in office? The question was rhetorical, but its intent was clear: rhetoric fades, but the consequences of policy—peace or war, prosperity or stagnation—endure.
The student acknowledged the point. Before the exchange ended, he asked Ramaswamy if he planned to run for office in 2028. Ramaswamy deflected with a smile, suggesting they revisit the question when the student graduates.
