Up Next

Candace Owens Exposes Wikipedia Manipulation Hours After Charlie Kirk Assassination and Confronts Donald Trump Jr.

Candace Owens Exposes Wikipedia Manipulation Hours After Charlie Kirk Assassination and Confronts Donald Trump Jr.

57:36

Candace Owens Exposes Andrew Kolvet's Lies About September 10th Flight Logs and Tarmac Hug

Candace Owens Exposes Andrew Kolvet's Lies About September 10th Flight Logs and Tarmac Hug

54:38

Zach From WolvesAndFinance Uncovers Alleged Military Fraud Connected to Charlie Kirk's Death at Fort Huachuca

Zach From WolvesAndFinance Uncovers Alleged Military Fraud Connected to Charlie Kirk's Death at Fort Huachuca

38:44

Candace Owens Exposes Disturbing Questions Surrounding Charlie Kirk Assassination and Erika Kirk's Suspicious Behavior

Categories: Investigation
May 30, 2026

Candace Owens reveals shocking details about the Charlie Kirk assassination case that mainstream media refuses to address. From Kash Patel's refusal to hand over critical documents to Tyler Robinson's defense team, to Erika Kirk's conflicting statements about the "Superman neck" story and alleged AI audio of Charlie appointing her CEO, Owens presents evidence that challenges the official narrative. Turning Point USA donors claim Charlie never made statements at an Aspen event that Erika says he did, yet the organization refuses to release video evidence. With the trial approaching and discovery still blocked, Owens explains why she refuses to accept the quick closure many are demanding and continues asking questions that make powerful people uncomfortable.

Kash Patel Blocks Critical Evidence From Defense Team

The Charlie Kirk assassination case has taken a disturbing turn as Kash Patel refuses to hand over documents to Tyler Robinson's defense team. According to Candace Owens, who has been closely following the trial proceedings, the defense team has filed motions stating they cannot proceed with the scheduled May hearing because they still haven't received basic discovery materials from Patel, who shouldn't even be involved in what is supposed to be a state case.

Tyler Robinson's defense team has not been able to access his phone, examine the alleged murder weapon, or verify any of the messages that Kash Patel claimed existed in the first 48 hours after the assassination. The defense argued they needed to postpone the May date because they literally have nothing to work with except what Patel told the public initially. The judge suggested they could bump the date if needed, but now Erika Kirk's team is fighting to keep the arbitrary May date, raising questions about why they would want to rush to trial without proper discovery.

Owens questions why anyone would want to proceed without allowing the defense to examine the evidence: "Imagine you're moving toward this date and all they have is what Kash Patel told us in the first 48 hours, but they will not give them the discovery on that. The defense has not even been able to access Tyler Robinson's phone. They haven't been able to see the gun. Nothing."

The Superman Neck Story That Doesn't Add Up

One of the most troubling inconsistencies Owens has uncovered involves the "Superman neck" story that circulated immediately after the assassination. Erika Kirk told the public through Andrew Kolvet that Charlie Kirk survived the initial attack because he had a "Superman neck" - information she claimed came from the surgeon who treated him. She further claimed Andrew Kolvet went rogue and tweeted this information without her permission.

However, Owens discovered through sources that this narrative is completely false. According to her information, Erika Kirk herself called the surgeon in a three-way call to discuss what to tell the public about why the bullet didn't penetrate further. The "Superman neck" phrasing came from Erika, not the surgeon, and Andrew Kolvet did not act without her permission.

Owens confronted Erika about this directly: "I said, 'That's a tough one for me, but okay.' And then I got the information that no, Erika actually called the surgeon. It's a three-way call and she wanted to know what to tell the public about why the bullet didn't go through and that Superman neck thing came from her." This deliberate lie to the public about the source of medical information and who authorized its release raises serious questions about Erika's credibility on other matters.

Turning Point USA Donors Claim Aspen Audio Is AI

Perhaps the most explosive revelation involves the audio recording that allegedly shows Charlie Kirk appointing Erika Kirk as CEO of Turning Point USA two weeks before his assassination. Erika told Megyn Kelly and others that Charlie made this statement at an Aspen donor event, marking a complete reversal of his lifelong position that women should stay home and raise children rather than pursue CEO positions.

According to Owens, Turning Point USA donors who were actually present at the Aspen event have contacted her to say that Charlie never made such a statement. These donors claim the audio is AI-generated. When Owens asked why the organization only plays audio rather than video of such a momentous statement, she received no answer. Blake Nefff, spokesperson for the organization, stated they would never release the video.

Owens explains why this matters: "If I'm lying about that, wouldn't you, if you're Andrew Kolvet, instantly say, 'Oh, here's the video, Candace.' Like, I don't know, maybe the donor forgot, but here it is. You have a video of Charlie on stage at an event and he says like, 'I want Erika Kirk. I appoint Erika Kirk to be the CEO.' People would have not had a dry eye in the place."

The claimed statement contradicts everything Charlie Kirk publicly advocated for years. Owens recalls one of her last conversations with him at the Democratic National Convention where he told her that if she didn't have kids, she didn't have a stake in the future of the country. He emphasized his belief that women should stay home and raise children, not work 80-hour weeks as CEOs while nannies raise their kids.

Strange Alliances and Deleted Messages

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination, Turning Point USA has formed partnerships that baffle those who knew Charlie's actual relationships. Ben Shapiro, who reportedly had a contentious relationship with Charlie, appeared at a Turning Point event with a million-dollar check. Josh Hammer, who Owens says misrepresented Charlie's beliefs, continues to have a platform within the organization.

Owens questions why Erika would embrace people who caused Charlie stress: "If that were my husband and Josh Hammer was lying about what my husband actually believed, I would be at war with him till this day. Immediate partnership with all of his enemies. It's crazy."

Another concerning detail involves deleted or missing text messages. Owens revealed that Charlie texted people the night before his assassination saying he thought "they were going to kill him." Erika initially denied this message existed, but later claimed it might have been on Telegram after Andrew Kolvet confirmed he received such a message. However, according to Owens, the message was sent via iMessage, not Telegram, raising questions about who deleted it or why Erika initially denied its existence.

Tyler Robinson's Family Supports Him Despite False Reports

The public was led to believe that Tyler Robinson's own family turned him in and knew he was guilty. However, Tyler Robinson's grandfather, whose weapon was allegedly used in the assassination, appeared at the trial defending his grandson. This directly contradicts the narrative that the family believed in Tyler's guilt and cooperated with authorities.

Owens states: "Everything has been a lie. And I've told the public that. When this case gets going, you're going to see that everything's a lie."

Benjamin Netanyahu's Strange Media Tour

On the day of Charlie Kirk's assassination, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conducted a US media tour, making unprompted statements about not being involved in Kirk's death. Owens finds this deeply suspicious, questioning why a foreign leader would be given a platform to comment on an American assassination before anyone had even suggested foreign involvement.

She notes that Charlie had successfully opposed Netanyahu's push for war with Iran, winning that debate with Trump and limiting military action to specific strikes rather than the broader conflict Netanyahu wanted. With Charlie removed from the picture, the policy shifted toward everything Netanyahu had advocated for.

Owens is careful not to claim definitive proof of Netanyahu's involvement, but she notes the suspicious timing and Netanyahu's unusual defensive posture: "Why was he on a US media tour on the day that he got assassinated? Why are we hosting him on media shows here in the US to chime in on Charlie Kirk's assassination? It's bonkers."

Resisting Pressure to Move On

Owens faces tremendous criticism from media figures and others who accuse her of cruelty toward Erika Kirk and conspiracy theorizing. However, she maintains that she's simply following objective facts and asking questions that deserve answers. She notes that the public supports her investigation, with viewers telling her they watch her show daily specifically because she refuses to accept the official narrative.

She explains her persistence: "We are designed to be an ADHD culture. Charlie died yesterday. I forgive him. Okay, everybody, move on. We're all good. Let's move on. Epstein files. Oh, who are we talking about? The Epstein files. Okay, good. Let's move on. Trump says it's good and you're MAGA, right? Here's some red meat. And we're not doing that."

Owens acknowledges she didn't want to arrive at suspicion of Erika Kirk, initially considering alternative explanations like blackmail or shell shock. She resisted the possibility because accepting that the people closest to Charlie might have betrayed him meant grieving all over again. But she concluded she had to follow the facts regardless of where they led.

The lack of adequate investigation by authorities only strengthens her resolve. With Kash Patel blocking discovery, alleged AI audio that donors dispute, demonstrable lies about medical information, deleted text messages, and a rushed trial timeline, Owens argues that someone needs to ask the uncomfortable questions that powerful people don't want answered.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:00] Well, the Aspen people who were at the

[00:01] event said that never happened.

[00:03] >> What?

[00:03] >> These are the Turning Point USA donors

[00:05] who have contacted me and said,

[00:06] "Candice, that is AI." He did not say

[00:08] that.

[00:09] >> What? Now, they have alleged that they

[00:10] have the video of that. Why do they only

[00:12] play the audio? And I obviously have a

[00:15] lot of resentment, particularly for Cash

[00:16] Patel because of the Charlie Kirk

[00:18] situation. looking at what he has done.

[00:20] The fact that he won't hand over the

[00:22] documents and the theater of that, the

[00:25] theater of how they came out and uh oh

[00:28] gosh, it makes me so sick. You have no

[00:31] idea how sick it all makes me to reflect

[00:33] upon just the fact that Charlie

[00:35] empowered these people like that. Like

[00:37] it makes me sick. Well, I mean, look, I

[00:41] So, I started watching I I had never

[00:44] watched your show until after he was

[00:46] assassinated cuz I'm like there there's

[00:48] something off. And she knew him better

[00:50] than anyone else in the media. So, let

[00:52] me see what she's got. But, I've got so

[00:55] much going on and it was hard to follow

[00:56] your like, you know, your investigation

[00:58] because there were so many moving parts

[01:00] and I got to produce a show and so I

[01:02] just kind of like dropped off a little

[01:03] bit. But what were you saying about Cash

[01:07] Patel's refusal to hand over documents?

[01:09] I don't know about that.

[01:10] >> So, the trial, I'm obviously on top of

[01:12] it because they

[01:14] >> I I really do think that what they're so

[01:16] angry about right now,

[01:18] >> more broadly speaking, is that we're

[01:20] staying focused on things.

[01:21] >> We are designed to be an ADHD culture.

[01:24] >> Charlie died yesterday. I forgive him.

[01:26] Okay, everybody, move on. We're all

[01:27] good. We're Let's move on. She's moved

[01:28] on. Everyone, forget about it. Uh

[01:30] Epstein files. Oh, who are we talking

[01:32] about? The Epste files. Okay, good.

[01:33] Let's move on. Let's move on. Okay.

[01:34] Trump says it's good and you're MAGA,

[01:36] right? Here's some red meat. You're

[01:37] MAGA. Trump said it. Lantern the king.

[01:39] Yeah.

[01:40] >> And we're not doing that. We're not

[01:42] move. We're not doing that. And with

[01:44] this, I was like, I am not moving on

[01:46] from this. And so the midterms. Exactly.

[01:48] We've signed up. We're getting the

[01:49] documents obviously, but the midterms

[01:52] and uh in this particular case, so they

[01:55] uh obviously I sat down with Erica and

[01:57] she explained to me they were sort of

[01:58] moving towards this May date or where he

[02:00] he hasn't even entered a plea yet to be

[02:02] clear. And so in May, they're supposed

[02:05] to have this hearing and there's limited

[02:07] discovery in that in that time frame

[02:08] because one of the questions I asked

[02:10] Erica uh sincerely was you're

[02:12] communicating to the public that you

[02:15] believe they have the right guy. So my

[02:17] assumption when she was saying that to

[02:18] Barry Weiss was that they obviously she

[02:20] has access to more information than we

[02:22] have like as you know she's involved in

[02:24] the case. She's listed as a victim on

[02:25] the case. Like she can see stuff that we

[02:26] can't see. Maybe it's literally a clear

[02:28] video of Tyler Robinson coming out and

[02:30] shooting Charlie. Like open to that. And

[02:31] then when I sat down with her, she was

[02:32] like, "Oh, no. I haven't I don't have

[02:33] anything more than the public has

[02:35] because we're now what happens is we

[02:37] have to move towards this May date and

[02:39] the um SBI, which is the uh Bureau of

[02:44] Investigations in Utah, is the state

[02:46] investigations in Utah. They're going to

[02:47] go now find the all of this evidence

[02:50] that Tyler Robinson did it." And Tyler

[02:53] Robinson then they present that to Tyler

[02:54] Robinson's team and they then build

[02:56] their sort of defense leading to this

[02:59] May date. Well, it turns out that Tyler

[03:02] Robbins's team false document and says,

[03:04] "We need to move the state because they

[03:06] we have been asking for Cash Patel, who

[03:09] should not even be involved in this

[03:10] case, mind you, it's a state case,

[03:12] >> to release the information to us to give

[03:14] us these documents to his defense, to

[03:17] his defense." So, like they're like, "He

[03:18] haven't even given it to Utah. Forget

[03:19] SBI. He hasn't given it to the SBI. The

[03:21] defense doesn't have it." and they're

[03:23] like, "How are we going to have this

[03:25] hearing when they're going to get up

[03:26] there and essentially put on a show

[03:28] trial and say, "Your honor, look at

[03:29] these messages." Where they're like, "We

[03:30] don't even know those messages are

[03:32] real." That's crazy,

[03:32] >> right? So, imagine you're you're we're

[03:34] moving toward this date and all they

[03:36] have is what Cash Patel told us in the

[03:38] first 48 hours, but they will not give

[03:40] them the discovery on that. They won't

[03:42] give them. So, like, if I say Anna

[03:44] texted me and said she did it, and that

[03:46] they want to say that blah blah blah,

[03:48] she hasn't even been able, the defense

[03:49] has not even been able to access Tyler

[03:50] Robinson's phone. They haven't been able

[03:52] to see the gun. Nothing.

[03:53] >> Wow.

[03:54] >> And what's holding that up?

[03:56] >> That is weird. And also, what's up with

[03:57] the arbitrary May date, right?

[04:00] >> Yeah. They So, and that was the thing.

[04:01] They fought back immediately cuz they

[04:02] were like, "We want to make sure that

[04:03] like we get the discovery that we're

[04:04] asking for." And the judge was like,

[04:05] "Oh, it'll be fine. Don't worry about

[04:06] it." By then in May, if we need to bump

[04:08] it, we will. And they all kind of agreed

[04:10] to that. And now that May is upon us, um

[04:13] Erica's team, cuz she's a listed victim.

[04:15] So, when I say Erica's team, I mean

[04:16] literally, she's a victim in this case,

[04:18] is fighting them. They're like, "No, we

[04:19] want to keep the May date." And I'm

[04:20] like, Why would you want to keep the May

[04:22] date? And I instantly alerted the public

[04:25] to that. I'm like, they are not giving

[04:27] them. They have no We have no idea these

[04:29] shady messages.

[04:31] >> Did Cash Patel uh after a few beers type

[04:34] them up? We don't know. We can't say no.

[04:36] >> That's so weird. You know what? So, when

[04:38] it comes to Erica's behavior, like I

[04:40] will admit like some of her behavior is

[04:42] odd, right? And off-putting. And I try

[04:45] to give people the benefit of the doubt.

[04:47] And I wonder if, you know, her

[04:50] insistence that it's Tyler Robinson and

[04:53] nothing else is shady and like we need

[04:55] to pursue this prosecution. It's

[04:56] definitely him. I wonder if it's

[04:58] because, you know, when a a family

[05:00] member of yours gets murdered or killed

[05:02] or harmed in some way. Usually the

[05:05] family members want closure so badly

[05:07] that they as soon as there's a suspect,

[05:08] they want that suspect to be the guilty

[05:10] one and they just go for it full force.

[05:13] And maybe that's what's

[05:16] informing her decisions to kind of

[05:18] pursue it the way that she's pursuing

[05:19] it. I don't know. But I will say this.

[05:23] I actually I don't know how I would

[05:24] behave to be honest. Like I just think

[05:26] about how much I love my husband and I I

[05:30] I don't think anyone would see me for a

[05:31] few years. Like I just would not be able

[05:33] to go public. I wouldn't be able to have

[05:36] the strength to even talk in public

[05:38] about anything. And so that stood out to

[05:41] me about her. But also, she's a

[05:43] different person than me. So, I I just

[05:46] people people do grieve differently. I

[05:48] just know that the case itself has a few

[05:51] elements to it that raise some eyebrows.

[05:54] >> Everyone in the media that's critical of

[05:56] you is like so voseiferous that it kind

[05:59] of gave me the idea that like the

[06:02] general public isn't with you until I

[06:04] told um female family members of mine

[06:06] that I'm doing your show and they're

[06:07] like, "Oh my god, I love Candace. I

[06:09] watch her every day." And I'm like,

[06:10] "Really? you're not mad at her because

[06:12] of the whole Erica thing. They're like,

[06:13] "No, no." And I'm like, "Really?" Like,

[06:15] I couldn't believe it. So,

[06:17] >> yeah,

[06:17] >> clearly what you're seeing is something.

[06:19] And I mean, the numbers in your show,

[06:21] like it's very highly viewed. Okay. So,

[06:24] obviously the people agree with you that

[06:26] there's something off and I agree with

[06:27] you that there's something off. I just

[06:28] don't know what it is. Yeah. And I think

[06:30] that what you're describing in is the

[06:33] process that we all went through because

[06:36] you don't want to even go down that

[06:39] route. Maybe it's maybe in my head I was

[06:41] like maybe she's being blackmailed.

[06:42] Maybe she's scared they're going to kill

[06:43] her. Maybe like like you said, she just

[06:46] wants a quick conclusion to all of this.

[06:48] Maybe she's still in shell shock and is

[06:50] actually not controlling anything at

[06:51] turning point was my initial suspicion

[06:53] and just on paper she's CEO but she's

[06:55] actually just home crying every day and

[06:57] like behind the scenes like you know

[06:58] Justin. I went through that whole thing

[07:00] and

[07:01] >> for me I never wanted to arrive at Erica

[07:06] being suspicious. I didn't abstained

[07:09] from the like, oh, she's wearing hot

[07:11] pants with J. None of that matters to me

[07:13] because I don't think people understand.

[07:15] I needed it as a part of my grieving

[07:18] process not to accept that plausibility

[07:21] because then for me beyond just having

[07:24] lost Charlie and having to wake up to

[07:27] then I then had to wake up to the idea

[07:28] that Trump betrayed him in a way and

[07:31] Cash Patel, everyone is betraying him

[07:34] and not want seeking more investigation.

[07:37] what I I had to go through to pursue

[07:39] that for it was I had to grieve again,

[07:42] right? Because I knew how much Charlie

[07:43] wanted love. Like I have these messages

[07:45] like I was helping Charlie draft text

[07:48] messages and what should I say? So I had

[07:51] to grieve again

[07:54] >> and go, okay, I need to like really just

[07:56] follow the facts here. And that's all

[07:57] I've done. And um it's landed me at

[08:00] she's remarkably suspicious. Not because

[08:02] of the way she dresses, not because of

[08:03] whether or not she's crying enough. All

[08:05] of that kind of paints a picture that

[08:06] makes people uncomfortable, but just

[08:09] objective lies. Objective lies that I

[08:12] can't comprehend. Why would you lie and

[08:14] tell the public? And I think for me, the

[08:15] most explosive one that no one wants to

[08:17] uh address by calling me a monster. Why

[08:20] would you lie and say that the surgeon

[08:24] told you or told Andrew that he had a

[08:26] Superman neck and all this stuff? That

[08:28] objectively did not come from the

[08:30] surgeon. It came from Erica. And why

[08:32] would you lie and tell me that Andrew

[08:34] went rogue and sent that message when

[08:36] you did it with him? I can't I can't

[08:37] make sense of that.

[08:39] >> Um a a source uh you know a source and I

[08:43] trust the source and obviously that's a

[08:45] strong statement to make. And so when

[08:47] Erica first said to me I also didn't

[08:49] believe her right. So when she said,

[08:51] "Oh," I said, "What's the Superman

[08:52] neck?" And she said, "Oh, well, you

[08:53] know, Andrew went rogue." And then I

[08:55] said, "The surgeon went rogue though and

[08:56] talked to the surgeon violated HIPPA and

[08:58] Andrew went and beyond having the

[09:01] conversation, Andrew then tweeted

[09:02] without your permission." Like that's a

[09:03] lot to have had to happen. I don't

[09:05] believe that the surgeon violated HIPPA

[09:06] and spoke to Andrew without your

[09:08] permission. And I said that to her face.

[09:09] I said,

[09:10] >> "That's a tough one for me, but okay."

[09:12] And then I got the information that no,

[09:14] Erica actually called the surgeon. It's

[09:17] a three-way call. and she wanted to know

[09:19] what to tell the public about why the

[09:21] bullet didn't go through and that

[09:23] Superman neck thing came from her. So,

[09:25] the public was told from Andrew.

[09:27] >> So, I'm like I can't somebody just

[09:29] defend it. Somebody just tell me why

[09:30] that shouldn't completely unnerve me.

[09:34] >> Donors the another huge one where like

[09:37] these are my two biggest things. Donors

[09:40] saying that that video that or or hasn't

[09:43] existed yet. the AI, alleged AI of

[09:46] Charlie saying, "I appoint Erica to be

[09:48] the CEO." Erica told me that he said

[09:50] that at an Aspen event. I was like,

[09:52] "Okay, great."

[09:53] >> Well, the Aspen people who were at the

[09:55] event said that never happened.

[09:56] >> What?

[09:57] >> These are the Turning Point USA donors

[09:59] who have contacted me and said,

[10:00] "Candice, that is AI." He did not say

[10:02] that.

[10:02] >> What?

[10:03] >> Now, they have alleged that they have

[10:04] the video of that. Why do they only play

[10:06] the audio?

[10:07] >> And then when I said, "Hey guys, um,

[10:09] this is not normal. It doesn't actually

[10:10] really sound like Charlie. the cadence

[10:12] is somewhat off and I said, "Okay, so

[10:14] just drop the video so we can all put

[10:16] this to bed." Not only that, people at

[10:18] Turning Point told me that he never said

[10:20] that at this event. Okay, so what am I

[10:22] left to do? I You guys mentioned this to

[10:25] the public. You said that Charlie two

[10:27] weeks before, I guess, had done a

[10:28] complete 180 on his entire life's

[10:30] perspective that women should stay home

[10:32] and raise the children and not be CEOs.

[10:34] And suddenly he was like, "You know

[10:35] what? Actually, not only should women do

[10:36] it, but single women should do it.

[10:38] Widows should do it. and the kids should

[10:40] just be raised by the nanny and they

[10:41] they should work 80 hour weeks.

[10:42] >> That does seem uncharacteristic of

[10:44] Charlie Kur,

[10:45] >> completely uncharacteristic of

[10:47] everything he's ever said.

[10:48] >> In fact, one of the last conversations I

[10:50] had with him was at the Democratic

[10:52] National Convention and um look, I

[10:54] always appreciated the fact that he was

[10:56] down to debate, right? And that he

[10:57] didn't ever let it get dirty like

[11:00] >> and so I I I appreciated that. And so we

[11:02] started debating about the role of women

[11:05] and he basically said cuz I don't have

[11:07] children. I don't plan on having

[11:08] children. It's just a decision that me

[11:10] and my husband made together. And

[11:12] honestly, I don't think that I have the

[11:14] right temperament to be a mom in today's

[11:15] society because I will definitely kill

[11:17] people if they come anywhere. Like what

[11:20] they're doing to my husband right now if

[11:21] they tried to like harm my kids

[11:23] >> prison.

[11:24] >> I Yeah, I would 100%. I don't give a

[11:26] damn. That's how I am. I'm like fiercely

[11:29] loyal and defensive of my family. Um but

[11:31] anyway, um he told me, "Well, you know,

[11:34] if you don't have kids, you don't really

[11:35] have a stake in the future of this

[11:36] country. And I just remember being very

[11:39] offended by that because I love this

[11:41] country so much and I definitely do have

[11:43] a stake in the future. Like I have

[11:44] young, you know, nieces and nephews that

[11:46] I love to death, but even if I didn't, I

[11:49] love the people of this country. Like I

[11:50] want it to succeed. And so, and so in

[11:53] that conversation, he like really

[11:55] reiterated what he believes the role of

[11:58] women should be. So then after he gets

[12:00] assassinated and you don't really

[12:03] question it at first because you don't

[12:05] want to be that guy or that person who's

[12:06] just like I don't know that sounds a

[12:08] little shady and weird

[12:10] >> and you go along to get along. That's a

[12:11] good example of a story where you go

[12:13] along to get along. But yeah, there was

[12:16] this feeling within me where it's like

[12:18] well maybe he was willing to go against

[12:20] his beliefs or his values because he

[12:23] wants to make sure that the business

[12:25] falls in the hands of a family member,

[12:28] right? Maybe that's why. But I just I do

[12:30] find it strange. I do.

[12:31] >> But it goes against common sense cuz not

[12:33] only the story we're being told is like

[12:35] specifically he said if anything ever

[12:37] happens to me, meaning like if I get

[12:38] killed, I want my wife to be the next

[12:40] person that gets into the line of fire

[12:41] while my kids are at home. Like what?

[12:43] Like no. That's a good point. Actually,

[12:44] your instinct is then no, shut this

[12:46] down. You go and move and stay away from

[12:49] politics forever and protect our

[12:51] children. So it defies common sense. And

[12:54] I know what Charlie's perspectives were.

[12:56] obviously the light that he wanted and

[12:58] what he said every time anybody asked

[13:00] him on his podcast. I mean, we have a

[13:02] decade of Charlie saying what he what

[13:03] his perspective perspective was on how

[13:05] women should stay home and there's no

[13:06] value in becoming a CEO and then

[13:08] suddenly it's whiplash and we're told

[13:09] actually right before he died he just

[13:10] had this amazing 180 that nobody it was

[13:13] a you know private donor event and now

[13:15] the donors are saying it didn't happen

[13:17] and that that is AI. Okay, that's a very

[13:20] big claim that I am making, right? And

[13:22] I'm not making that claim. By the way,

[13:23] the donors are contacting me and saying

[13:26] this never happened because they

[13:27] couldn't believe it because they said

[13:28] they were watching my podcast and when

[13:30] they had heard it initially when Erica

[13:31] told the story to Megan Kelly, they

[13:33] thought, "Oh, it must have been at the

[13:34] Hampton's or whatever it was." And then

[13:36] when I said it was Aspen, they were

[13:39] shocked. They said, "This absolutely

[13:41] does not happen." So, if I'm lying about

[13:43] that, wouldn't you, if you're Andrew

[13:45] Kovette, instantly say, "Oh, here's the

[13:48] video, Candace." Like, I don't know,

[13:50] maybe the donor forgot, but here it is.

[13:51] And now we're suddenly going, "Why

[13:52] didn't they drop the video?"

[13:54] >> Yeah.

[13:54] >> Like, they had her walk out to the

[13:55] audio. That would have been a very

[13:56] powerful Could you imagine? You have a

[13:59] video of Charlie on stage at an event

[14:00] and he says like, "I want Erica Kirk. I

[14:02] appoint Erica Kirk to be the CEO." Like,

[14:05] people would have had not had a dry eye

[14:07] in the place.

[14:08] I think it would have like even more

[14:10] people around her and said, "Okay, I

[14:12] don't love it, but like it is it was

[14:14] like Charlie's dying wish."

[14:16] >> And Blake Nef says, "We're never

[14:18] dropping the video."

[14:19] >> That's so weird.

[14:20] >> It's bonkers. And so I have there are

[14:22] are real things that are compelling me

[14:24] to continue this pursuit. I'm not

[14:26] interested in the vanity of like, you

[14:28] know, her outfits or her makeup. And

[14:31] >> you're under tremendous fire right now.

[14:34] I mean, it's I can't even imagine like

[14:37] people in the media are really going at

[14:39] it like just trying to, you know, attack

[14:42] you for being cruel and and you know,

[14:44] going after Erica and like I do think

[14:47] that they put words in your mouth

[14:48] sometimes and say things that you didn't

[14:50] actually say. But, you know, the other

[14:53] thing that I mean, look, you tend to

[14:57] provide receipts when you have them,

[14:59] right? And so everyone was denying what

[15:01] you were saying about the very real

[15:03] pressure campaign that Charlie was

[15:05] undergoing. And when you released those

[15:07] text messages, I was like, "Oh my gosh,

[15:10] like this is this is a big deal."

[15:13] >> And I'm not saying that it's definitive

[15:15] that there's like a connection uh to his

[15:17] assassination. But just knowing what he

[15:20] was going through personally behind the

[15:22] scenes in the months leading up to his

[15:24] assassination is um information that

[15:28] maybe the FBI should be pursuing. No. or

[15:31] if you if you are the wife of Charlie

[15:33] Kirk

[15:35] >> um wouldn't heads be rolling like would

[15:37] I I the last people

[15:40] >> that would ever have a platform at

[15:42] Turning Point USA if I was the helm of

[15:43] it were the people who stressed him out

[15:45] who pressured him who

[15:46] >> I would go to war with Josh Hammer

[15:49] >> if that were my husband and Josh Hammer

[15:51] was lying about what my husband actually

[15:54] believed

[15:55] I would be at war with him right

[15:57] >> till this day

[15:58] >> immediate partnership with all of all of

[16:00] his enemies.

[16:00] >> It's crazy. They can't make sense of

[16:02] that. Weird. I can't make sense of that.

[16:04] Everybody knows Ben and Charlie hated

[16:05] each other. Like it's like just a known

[16:07] thing in politics. Like they just never

[16:09] got along and then he's opening and it

[16:12] doesn't make sense to me. Setting aside

[16:13] my personal feelings for Ben, uh which

[16:15] were always in line with Charlie's

[16:16] because of how he behaves behind the

[16:18] scenes. How do you explain that?

[16:20] >> Yeah. He comes in with a million dollar

[16:22] check, sits in a chair, and then just

[16:23] says not. Like, it's like that doesn't

[16:25] make sense to the public because a

[16:27] normal reaction to a loved one is

[16:29] everybody who caused them grief, who put

[16:31] pressure on their donors, who uh how

[16:33] about me having to be the one to tell

[16:35] people that he the night before texted

[16:39] and said that he thought they were going

[16:41] to kill him. And not only that, but she

[16:43] explicitly denied that I'm going back

[16:45] until I clocked it and said, "Well,

[16:47] Andrew Kovette told me that he was one

[16:48] of the ones that received it." And then

[16:50] it became the story about, oh, maybe it

[16:52] was in Telegram. Dan Flood received a

[16:54] message as well. It wasn't on Telegram.

[16:56] It was on iMessage. So, who who deleted

[16:58] it? Or or were you lying or did somebody

[17:01] delete it? Okay, I want to give you the

[17:02] benefit of the doubt. Maybe someone took

[17:04] his phone in between and deleted all

[17:05] that.

[17:06] >> I don't even know why you have his phone

[17:07] actually. I feel like that should be an

[17:08] evidence. But it's it becomes

[17:11] increasingly hard that no one is

[17:13] attacking the substance of what I'm

[17:14] presenting. They're just saying like,

[17:17] "How dare you? How dare you keep telling

[17:19] the truth about what Charlie was going

[17:21] through? How dare you present to the

[17:22] public that he did not die a

[17:24] Judeo-Christian and that he was angry

[17:27] with how he was being treated?

[17:29] >> Well, there was one other thing that I

[17:30] thought was interesting, right?

[17:34] The audio of uh Tyler Robinson's

[17:37] grandfather, remember Tyler Robinson

[17:40] allegedly was like turned in by his

[17:42] family. his like family knew he was

[17:44] guilty and they No, it turns out his

[17:46] grandfather whose weapon he allegedly

[17:48] used, right, to carry out the

[17:50] assassination was there at the trial

[17:53] defending his grandson. But we were all

[17:55] led to believe that the family, you

[17:56] know, knew that Tyler Robinson is guilty

[17:59] and are not supporting him in this

[18:01] process.

[18:02] >> Everything has been a lie. And I've I've

[18:04] told the public that. I'm like, when

[18:05] this case gets going, you're going to

[18:07] see that everything's a lie. And so, we

[18:08] are left asking the question is, why are

[18:10] they lying? And I I'm sorry that we're

[18:13] rational thinkers and we are seeing how

[18:15] >> I don't trust my government. Like it's

[18:16] it's that simple. I just don't trust the

[18:19] government. That's where we're at. So I

[18:22] I feel like anyone who doesn't have a

[18:24] healthy dose of skepticism

[18:26] needs to get some. Okay. Because

[18:28] >> BB's radical denials when no one was

[18:30] pointing the finger at him was also kind

[18:32] of just like weird.

[18:33] >> Yeah.

[18:33] >> I didn't kill Charlie Kirk. I I didn't I

[18:35] I didn't kill Charlie Kirk. Why Why are

[18:36] you saying that right now?

[18:37] >> I know. That was pretty wild. First of

[18:39] all, why was he on a US media tour on

[18:43] the day that he got assassinated?

[18:46] >> I like I don't care what Netanyahu

[18:48] thinks about anything that happens in

[18:49] our country at all. He should be in

[18:51] prison for the rest of his life uh as a

[18:53] war criminal because that's what he is.

[18:56] Why are we hosting him on media shows

[18:58] here in the US to chime in on Charlie

[19:01] Kirk's assassination?

[19:02] >> It's bonkers. I have resisted

[19:07] like allowing myself to believe that

[19:09] there's like a wider conspiracy because

[19:11] you just don't want to believe it.

[19:13] >> But I will say this, I nothing adds up.

[19:16] Like this whole situation doesn't add

[19:18] up. And I do find it very strange that

[19:20] the person who wants to ask questions

[19:22] and look, you might pursue threads that

[19:25] don't go anywhere. And I think people

[19:27] have a problem with that, right? They

[19:28] feel like, oh, you're incriminating

[19:29] individuals who are innocent. Like

[19:31] that's the big argument I hear against

[19:32] you. But I don't think you'd be pursuing

[19:34] this if you felt like there was an

[19:36] adequate investigation being done. And I

[19:37] myself agree with you that there isn't

[19:39] an adequate investigation being done.

[19:41] >> And he went toe-to-toe with BB and he

[19:43] won over the Iran war. And I think that

[19:45] people have to understand that we're

[19:47] sitting here talking about how he feels

[19:48] nothing as he mass murders children. The

[19:50] way that he lies is also there's

[19:52] something so psychopathic about it when

[19:54] he just gets on and pretends he's

[19:55] perpetually the victim and he's just

[19:58] killing people all day, every homicidal

[20:00] maniac who is supported by the halls of

[20:02] Congress who gets a standing ovation

[20:04] when he walks into Congress. So if

[20:06] that's possible, if it's plausible for

[20:08] these people not to want to spit in his

[20:10] direction when he walks by them, uh then

[20:13] we have to imagine that would you think

[20:14] you'd have an issue like doing something

[20:16] to Charlie Kirk? He it means nothing to

[20:18] these and I'm not saying that we have

[20:20] evidence that BB Netanyahu did

[20:23] >> but I am saying that the way in which he

[20:25] reacted and me knowing how they wanted

[20:27] this war so badly and that Charlie at

[20:30] first stood in the way of it literally

[20:32] like debated and got Trump not to do

[20:35] anything more than that limited a

[20:37] military operation um when they when

[20:40] they bombed Fort

[20:41] >> and the other was it tons the other

[20:43] nuclear sites and BB was pissed and then

[20:45] we fast forward Charlie's out of the And

[20:47] what are we doing? Everything BB wanted

[20:49] to be done. So

Link copied to clipboard!