Up Next
Gary Melton STRUGGLES over Erika Kirk! Tyler Robinson Family DROPS Bombshell on Charlie Kirk Case
1:13:41
Dangerous Liberty CLIPS: Dismantling of Candace Owens' false witness "Mitch Snow"
11:16
Zach Costello Catches Tracy Martin Lying About Her Daughter and the UVU Event
56:39
Candace Owens issued a harsh response to Erika Kirk about what it takes to be the CEO of Turning Point USA, and she has a very good point given the latest finding about how TPUSA failed to protect Charlie Kirk. Sean Hannity had an absolute melt down over this...
Click: http://www.twc.health/zach to peptide your pain away with THERABLUE Pain Relieving Gel
from The Wellness Company. Use code ZACH to save 10% Off + Free Shipping on every order ??.
Subscribe and Follow Me Here??
Zach Costello: https://www.zachcostello.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@zachcostello_
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/zachcostello_/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@zachcostello_
X: https://twitter.com/ZachCostello_
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/zcostello
Video Transcript
[00:00] Candace Owens issued a response to Erica
[00:02] Kirk after Erica called her out on Fox
[00:05] News for making money off of Candace's
[00:07] investigation into the assassination of
[00:10] Charlie Kirk and for attacking her
[00:12] family, who she included as those people
[00:15] who work at Turning Point USA. This clip
[00:18] that I'm about to show you from
[00:19] Candace's response, I thought was her
[00:21] best moment and the most effective
[00:23] argument to Erica. However, Sean
[00:26] Hannity, who I guess has decided to ruin
[00:29] his career over this, came out and said
[00:31] astonishingly that he is the one who has
[00:34] been right about everything and anyone
[00:36] who was pushing back on these conspiracy
[00:38] theories and asking these questions
[00:41] about Turning Point USA needs to shut
[00:44] up. Hm. Well, here's the problem with
[00:47] that. We have more proof and evidence of
[00:50] either incompetence or willful
[00:52] negligence at Turning Point USA by
[00:55] employees leading up to the UVU event
[00:58] where Charlie lost his life that you are
[01:00] going to want to hear. But what I'm
[01:03] going to start with, since this adds
[01:05] perfect context to this entire
[01:07] narrative, is Congressman Tim Bett
[01:10] explaining how the lone wolf narrative
[01:14] is never true and how certain operatives
[01:17] target individuals to carry out these
[01:20] style of attacks. I guess this makes
[01:23] Bett a Sean Hannity diagnosed conspiracy
[01:27] theorist. Do me a favor first and make
[01:29] sure that you are subscribed. I am here
[01:32] after the truth. We aren't blind
[01:34] followers of any individual. We are God
[01:37] first, striving to keep America one
[01:39] nation under God and remain in the
[01:42] truth. I'm Zach Costello.
[01:45] Listen to Congressman Tim Burett explain
[01:48] on the Benny Johnson show how the lone
[01:51] wolf narrative, including as it relates
[01:53] to Tyler Robinson in the Charlie Kurt
[01:54] case, is almost never true. This is how
[01:57] government operatives, foreign and
[02:00] domestic, do it. If you thought this was
[02:02] fairy tale fiction, you're very wrong
[02:04] and you need to wake up.
[02:05] >> I think that mo what most people are
[02:07] asking is how is it possible that some
[02:10] degenerate
[02:12] spectrum autistic loner who doesn't have
[02:14] any friends, didn't speak to any
[02:15] >> always a loner. Always a loner. They
[02:17] never, you know, no contact. Remember
[02:19] they said that about um
[02:21] >> Thomas Krooks. Yeah.
[02:22] >> Tyler Robinson.
[02:24] Yeah.
[02:24] >> Yeah. Parents didn't know what he was
[02:26] doing. didn't know that. You know, same
[02:28] deal. Same deal. It's always follows the
[02:31] pattern. Again,
[02:33] I say this a lot and I get labeled a
[02:35] lot, but I think you've got
[02:37] organizations that um that, you know,
[02:41] they they were sued for it once before.
[02:43] You know, I've had this conversation. I
[02:44] think it was the CIA was sued. They
[02:46] said, "Oh, we don't do mind control, all
[02:48] that stuff." Then they got in a lawsuit
[02:49] and they got their butts sued. And then
[02:52] they said, "Well, we do it. We did it,
[02:54] but we don't do it anymore." So, were
[02:56] you lying then? Are you lying now? Are
[02:57] you still lying? Which I think they're
[02:59] still lying. And, you know, they they
[03:01] put this garbage out to the, you know,
[03:04] and through the way that, you know, the
[03:06] airwaves on the internet. It's pretty
[03:08] simple. Um, how they do it and they and
[03:10] they target these individuals. And I
[03:12] think that's how they do it. I think
[03:13] they they expect this thing to happen
[03:16] and somebody is is is pumping this
[03:18] garbage out.
[03:19] >> What this is specifically called is
[03:21] covert influence. The CIA has lied about
[03:24] using it and then admitted to doing it.
[03:26] As Bashett explains here, this is used
[03:28] by America and it's used by governments
[03:31] around the world to influence certain
[03:33] outcomes in whatever country they are
[03:35] operating within. In this specific case
[03:38] of Tyler Robinson, multiple people
[03:41] online knew that something was going to
[03:43] happen. On September 10th, foreign
[03:45] military contractors arrived in Provo
[03:48] the week leading up to the
[03:49] assassination. A disproportionate number
[03:51] of foreign registered cell phones were
[03:53] located at the UVU event when Charlie
[03:56] was killed. A decoy sprang up right
[04:00] after the shot was taken. Tyler Robinson
[04:02] was radicalized quickly in the months
[04:04] leading up to the assassination. This
[04:07] Turning Point USA event was planned at
[04:09] the last minute with insufficient
[04:12] security and emergency protocols because
[04:14] of how Turning Point USA completed forms
[04:17] for UVU. I'm going to cover that here in
[04:20] a second and it's very disturbing which
[04:22] you'll see. But as far as I'm concerned,
[04:25] it is more likely that this was a
[04:28] coordinated hit involving multiple
[04:30] people than not. So now it's just a
[04:33] matter of foreign or domestic covert
[04:37] influence. If Tyler Robinson pulled the
[04:40] trigger, as I've said, fine. I just want
[04:43] the truth. Who influenced him, though?
[04:46] and who was he working with? This is
[04:49] what I and everyone else should care
[04:52] about. Period. And getting to the truth,
[04:55] the full truth of this matter is of
[04:58] highest priority regardless of the
[05:00] political and global consequences.
[05:02] Israel, for example, had a lot to lose
[05:05] if Charlie and Turning Point USA had
[05:08] turned against them. And they had a lot
[05:10] to gain if Turning Point USA continued
[05:13] to lead the pro-Israel agenda in
[05:15] America. The left had a lot to gain with
[05:18] Charlie Kirk out of the way. After all,
[05:21] he and Turning Point USA just got Trump
[05:24] elected president. Turning Point USA is
[05:27] not some small business. It is a big
[05:29] money, big power organization with a lot
[05:32] at stake. And the very influential
[05:35] founder of said organization was
[05:38] assassinated. When President Trump was
[05:40] almost killed in Butler, Pennsylvania,
[05:42] we demanded the Secret Service be held
[05:44] accountable. The director stepped down.
[05:47] We wanted heads to roll for the
[05:49] incompetence and we wanted
[05:51] investigations into any willful
[05:54] negligence. Why is this unacceptable to
[05:57] do when it comes to TurningPoint USA?
[06:00] Why does this make you a vile evil
[06:02] conspiracy theorist as Sean Hannity, who
[06:05] apparently is right about everything,
[06:08] says that you are? Listen, this is a
[06:10] perfect setup in context for what
[06:12] Candace pushed back on against Erica and
[06:15] the failures of Turning Point USA that
[06:17] day Charlie was killed. You know, I've
[06:19] been doing TV and radio now for 30 plus
[06:21] years, and you know that on this show,
[06:24] we more often than not, we end up
[06:26] putting facts first, and we're way ahead
[06:28] of the curve, and we get it right when
[06:30] the legacy media mob so often gets
[06:33] things wrong. Um, and you know, on this
[06:36] program, I believe every word I say
[06:39] there, we are very transparent what we
[06:41] do. But in today's internet age, where I
[06:44] guess anybody can have their own talk
[06:45] show, where everything's about clicks,
[06:47] everything's about money, everything's
[06:49] about views, a lot of people out there,
[06:52] they don't seem to have any issue with
[06:55] spewing the most incendiary, hateful,
[06:59] outrageous, conspiratorial comments that
[07:02] they can dream up. And somehow someway,
[07:05] some of the people who traffic in this
[07:07] kind of hatred and talk have actually
[07:10] decided to turn the tragic political
[07:13] assassination of Charlie Kirk into their
[07:16] latest topic of fascination with a
[07:18] variety of absolutely insane conspiracy
[07:21] theories. Uh some people are even trying
[07:24] to figure out where Charlie Kirk is
[07:27] buried. Does it get any more evil, any
[07:30] sicker than this? Well, not to me. I
[07:33] find all of this disgusting and
[07:35] repulsive. Erica, her children, the
[07:38] people at Turning Point, they have been
[07:41] through enough this year. It is time for
[07:44] people to shut up and leave these people
[07:47] alone.
[07:47] >> Quick Google search. What did Sean
[07:51] Hannity say and do about the COVID
[07:53] vaccine?
[07:55] In July of 2021, Hannity told his
[07:58] viewers, "Please take CO seriously. I
[08:00] can't say it enough. Enough people have
[08:02] died. We don't need any more death. He
[08:05] added, I believe in science. I believe
[08:07] in the science of vaccination. And he
[08:10] said, absolutely makes sense for many
[08:14] Americans to get vaccinated. He ended up
[08:17] getting the vaccine. Hm. I just cannot
[08:20] understand for the life of me and
[08:23] especially after CO and all we've been
[08:26] through with the authorities and the
[08:28] elites and what you just heard from
[08:31] Congressman Tim Burett. Why these people
[08:35] cannot remain skeptical and open-minded.
[08:39] Arrogance I know better and you don't
[08:42] get to ask questions never plays. And
[08:45] this is what Candace gets at here
[08:47] against Erica. We'll get to that right
[08:49] after a quick break here for our
[08:52] sponsors that are keeping this channel
[08:54] independent and allowing me to do this
[08:56] full-time. The wellness company sponsors
[08:59] this channel, guys. And you know that
[09:01] stubborn ache that never quite goes
[09:02] away. The one that ice, heat, or pain
[09:06] pills barely touch? What if you could
[09:08] target it at the cellular level instead
[09:11] of just numbing it? That's exactly what
[09:13] TheraBlue was designed to do. TheraBlue
[09:17] is a next generation pain relieving
[09:19] peptide gel that works deeper than the
[09:22] skin's surface. Powered by Aqua
[09:25] Molecular Delivery Technology, it
[09:28] delivers peptides and botanicals
[09:30] directly into muscle tissue for legit
[09:33] lasting relief. Its hero ingredient,
[09:36] copper peptide, promotes collagen
[09:38] synthesis, reduces inflammation, and
[09:41] helps accelerate repair. NAD+
[09:44] restores cellular energy to aid
[09:46] recovery, while methylene blue protects
[09:49] your mitochondria and supports
[09:51] endurance. I am all about mitochondrial
[09:54] health. That is important. Natural
[09:56] extracts like MSM, turmeric, white
[09:58] willow bark, arnica, and ginger soothe
[10:02] inflammation. While menthol, camfor, and
[10:05] eucalyptus oil deliver instant cooling
[10:08] relief. It absorbs fast and leaves your
[10:10] skin refreshed, not greasy. Apply a thin
[10:13] layer, massage until absorb, and let
[10:15] your body experience lasting recovery.
[10:18] Get 10% off by visiting twwc.health/zac.
[10:24] That's twwc.althzac.
[10:27] and use the code Zach Z A C H to get
[10:31] that 10% off. Move freely again with the
[10:35] blue. Now, let's get back into the show.
[10:37] Okay, so Candace Owens issued a response
[10:39] after Erica Kirk called her out on Fox
[10:41] News for profiting off of her
[10:44] investigation into the Charlie Kirk
[10:45] assassination and for attacking her
[10:48] family, who Erica included as the people
[10:50] who work at Turning Point USA. This
[10:53] clip, which is pretty hilarious to
[10:55] start, I thought was Candace's most
[10:58] effective argument against Erica,
[11:00] especially given what I'm going to show
[11:02] you after this about the people at
[11:04] Turning Point USA and how they failed to
[11:07] protect Charlie. Listen.
[11:09] >> WHOA. [screaming]
[11:10] WHOA. ERICA KIRK SHUTS DOWN the con. No,
[11:14] she didn't even respond to one of the
[11:15] conspiracies. She gave us emotion. She
[11:18] gave us emotion. She said, "I'm a
[11:20] mother. I am a wife." And we never asked
[11:23] about whether she was mother or wife. We
[11:24] want to know if she is a CEO and a
[11:26] chairman. And a CEO and a chairman has
[11:29] to compartmentalize. A CEO and a
[11:31] chairman cannot respond to valid
[11:33] questions and critiques about finances,
[11:35] about shady actions that are being taken
[11:38] by people that require presidential
[11:40] pardons. People that are meaningfully
[11:42] asking uh why we are not getting a clear
[11:45] answer of what took place in September
[11:46] 10th. CEO, okay, does not get to respond
[11:50] and say, "That's my family, okay? That's
[11:54] my that's my that is what I that's the
[11:56] energy of what I would expect from a
[11:59] mother speaking to a teacher, which I I
[12:02] was this mom." Like, that's my kid.
[12:04] Okay. And there we'll shut this down
[12:07] right now. That's my child. This is not
[12:08] a child. Turning Point USA is an
[12:10] organization. And Erica already had an
[12:13] uphill battle to climb. like that. She
[12:15] had to climb this because, by the way,
[12:17] just because if if this was Goldman
[12:19] Sachs and the president of Goldman Sachs
[12:23] or managing director over at Goldman
[12:24] Sachs died in a horrifically violent
[12:26] way, the Goldman Sachs family
[12:31] uh might mourn for a couple of months,
[12:34] but they would have instantly had
[12:35] someone to replace that individual. And
[12:37] beyond that, they would have never
[12:38] accepted
[12:40] the the public and and the people that
[12:43] um are investing money. They would have
[12:45] never accepted, well, he's gone, but
[12:47] here's his wife. She already had an up
[12:50] hill to climb here, right? Like this
[12:52] does not make you qualified because you
[12:53] love someone to take on their job. I am
[12:55] not qualified to do what my husband
[12:56] does. That's why I said I would I
[12:58] wouldn't want to be the CEO and the
[12:59] chairman of a company. Actually, there's
[13:00] a great clip of uh Jordan Peterson
[13:03] asking that very question. Like, why do
[13:04] women want to be like, why would you
[13:06] want to have it's actually a lot of work
[13:07] and it's very stressful and it's a lot
[13:08] of numbers and you're crunching numbers
[13:10] and you have to be everywhere. Okay, if
[13:12] you want that, great. If you built the
[13:15] company and you're in the room like
[13:16] Charlie Kirk did and you have proven to
[13:18] the public like, hey, I built this
[13:21] company. I didn't even go to college and
[13:22] I've been doing this for over a decade
[13:24] as Charlie Kirk did. You've earned that
[13:25] street cred. Okay, so she already had a
[13:28] hill decline because now they're saying,
[13:30] "Well, this is his wife." And so,
[13:33] you know, that's it. Well, now you're
[13:35] going to have to prove that you have the
[13:36] ability to be a CEO and a chairman and
[13:38] not just a wife who we expect emotion
[13:40] from. And you have you're rightful in
[13:41] that capacity. You are rightful to have
[13:43] emotion. You are rightful to be the
[13:44] agrieved widow, but you don't get to
[13:46] just be widowed into the position of
[13:48] chairman and CEO. don't get to respond
[13:49] to well in this case investors, donors
[13:52] who have given money and are asking
[13:54] meaningful questions with no you don't
[13:57] you you you don't you don't get replies
[13:59] right now cuz this this is the Charlie
[14:00] Kirk show fam doesn't work this way.
[14:02] >> Two things can be true at once. Erica is
[14:04] a grieving widow and mother and she is
[14:08] not making the right decisions as the
[14:10] CEO of a massive and powerful company
[14:13] that her husband built and is currently
[14:16] under the microscope because he was
[14:18] assassinated and people want answers.
[14:21] Just because Charlie wanted Erica as the
[14:24] CEO and the Turning Point USA board
[14:27] voted her in does not mean that that was
[14:29] a prudent decision. We can talk about
[14:32] this objectively and separately from her
[14:35] being a grieving widow and mother. If
[14:39] she wants to be a grieving widow and
[14:41] mother, that's fine. Then what she
[14:43] should have done maybe is hire an
[14:45] interim CEO to cover this period. But
[14:49] Candace is right. Now she is the CEO of
[14:52] this company. And this company, like I
[14:54] said, is under the microscope because of
[14:56] what happened.
[14:58] as an effective and competent CEO of
[15:01] Turning Point, given that its leader was
[15:04] assassinated and they failed to protect
[15:06] him, wouldn't you, for example, do an
[15:10] internal investigation to find the
[15:13] failures? Or maybe see if someone
[15:15] planned or leaked the location of the
[15:17] event to one of those domestic or
[15:20] foreign operatives that could have been
[15:23] involved, that were likely involved.
[15:25] Like, wouldn't we want full
[15:27] accountability and transparency instead
[15:30] of just calling them your family, which
[15:32] is cute. Why would we just not want to
[15:35] find who dropped the ball on this? This
[15:39] is from a viral video that was
[15:41] supposedly debunking Candace and her
[15:43] receipts. It didn't land as expected.
[15:46] Listen. Now, let's talk about the
[15:47] ambulance. Candace finds it suspicious
[15:49] that there was no ambulance on standby
[15:51] at the event. Typically, uh, the states
[15:54] dictate the protocol and you're required
[15:57] to after you have a certain number of
[15:58] attendees at an event, you are required
[16:00] to have an ambulance on standby. And I
[16:02] don't know Utah state law. Uh, but I
[16:04] also found that that weird uh that there
[16:06] wouldn't have been an ambulance on
[16:07] standby. Again, correct me if I'm wrong.
[16:09] Uh, but seemed atypical to me.
[16:12] >> She's right to raise this because that
[16:14] is a genuine failure and Turning Point
[16:17] bears significant responsibility for it.
[16:20] But that could just be incompetence, not
[16:22] malevolence. Here's another way to look
[16:24] at it. The Turning Point student chapter
[16:26] at UVU, the campus club that organized
[16:28] the event, filled out the planning
[16:30] forms. They initially estimated 200
[16:33] attendees. That low estimate didn't
[16:35] trigger UVU's major events assessment
[16:39] committee, the body that would have
[16:40] required enhanced security and medical
[16:42] coverage for large gatherings. Now, they
[16:45] eventually revised the form to estimate
[16:47] that 600 students would come. And they
[16:50] did that based on a neighboring school's
[16:52] Turning Point event the previous year
[16:55] that did draw about 600. Later, Turning
[16:58] Point corporate got involved and told
[17:00] the students to revise expectations
[17:02] to,500 to 2,000 people and it was still
[17:05] wrong because over 3,000 people showed
[17:07] up. The result was that only two EMTs
[17:11] were on site and there was no dedicated
[17:14] ambulance for a crowd five times larger
[17:17] than anyone planned for. So, was that
[17:19] negligent? Arguably, yes. Turning Point
[17:23] Corporate should have ensured that
[17:25] proper protocols were followed. UVU
[17:27] systems should have caught this. The
[17:30] student organizers were in over their
[17:32] heads. This event at UVU was planned
[17:35] abnormally late for Turning Point USA
[17:37] events. UVU also told Turning Point USA
[17:41] staff the amphitheater location was not
[17:44] a good idea and could not be protected
[17:46] properly. Someone made the call on that
[17:49] location anyways. And whoever at
[17:51] TurningPoint USA completed the forms,
[17:53] severely undersshot the crowd size,
[17:56] which dictated the emergency services
[17:59] that were present. And even after
[18:01] revisions made by Turning Point USA
[18:03] corporate, they undersshot the
[18:05] attendance by half, reporting that 1500
[18:08] to a,000 would be there, over 3,000
[18:11] people attended this event. And this
[18:13] undershooting prevented an ambulance
[18:16] from being able to be present. Charlie's
[18:18] head of security told UVU police that he
[18:21] was concerned about the rooftops in
[18:23] front of Charlie. The UVU police said
[18:25] they had it covered, but Charlie's
[18:27] security staff never followed up on
[18:29] this. All of this to say, this is at
[18:32] least negligence and incompetence by
[18:35] multiple staff at Turning Point USA,
[18:38] which resulted in the death of Charlie
[18:40] Kirk, and people should be held
[18:41] accountable for it. At worst, well, this
[18:45] is why people have questions and are
[18:46] unhappy about their behavior in the
[18:50] aftermath and are unhappy about answers
[18:52] like the ones that Erica Kirk, the CEO
[18:55] of Turning Point USA, gave all of us. It
[18:57] doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist.
[18:59] It just makes you a reality observer.
[19:03] I'm Zach Costello.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.