Up Next
Zach Costello Exposes How Turning Point USA Betrayed Erika Kirk's Agreement with Candace Owens
13:38
Zach Costello Discovered Something Very Strange About the Witches Who Allegedly Cursed Charlie Kirk
53:07
Andrew Kolvet Attacks Candace Owens on Dave Rubin Show Over Erika Kirk Questions
8:50
Candace Owens SNAPS BACK at Erika Kirk and Sean Hannity EXPLODES!
Candace Owens issued a harsh response to Erika Kirk about what it takes to be the CEO of Turning Point USA, and she has a very good point given the latest finding about how TPUSA failed to protect Charlie Kirk. Sean Hannity had an absolute melt down over this... Click: http://www.twc.health/zach to peptide your pain away with THERABLUE Pain Relieving Gel from The Wellness Company. Use code ZACH to save 10% Off + Free Shipping on every order 🇺🇸. Subscribe and Follow Me Here👇ðŸ¼
Candace Owens issued a harsh response to Erika Kirk about what it takes to be the CEO of Turning Point USA, and she has a very good point given the latest finding about how TPUSA failed to protect Charlie Kirk. Sean Hannity had an absolute melt down over this...
Click: http://www.twc.health/zach to peptide your pain away with THERABLUE Pain Relieving Gel
from The Wellness Company. Use code ZACH to save 10% Off + Free Shipping on every order 🇺🇸.
Subscribe and Follow Me Here👇🏼
Zach Costello: https://www.zachcostello.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@zachcostello_
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/zachcostello_/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@zachcostello_
X: https://twitter.com/ZachCostello_
Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/zcostello
Video Transcript
Candace Owens issued a response to Erica
Kirk after Erica called her out on Fox
News for making money off of Candace's
investigation into the assassination of
Charlie Kirk and for attacking her
family, who she included as those people
who work at Turning Point USA. This clip
that I'm about to show you from
Candace's response, I thought was her
best moment and the most effective
argument to Erica. However, Sean
Hannity, who I guess has decided to ruin
his career over this, came out and said
astonishingly that he is the one who has
been right about everything and anyone
who was pushing back on these conspiracy
theories and asking these questions
about Turning Point USA needs to shut
up. Hm. Well, here's the problem with
that. We have more proof and evidence of
either incompetence or willful
negligence at Turning Point USA by
employees leading up to the UVU event
where Charlie lost his life that you are
going to want to hear. But what I'm
going to start with, since this adds
perfect context to this entire
narrative, is Congressman Tim Bett
explaining how the lone wolf narrative
is never true and how certain operatives
target individuals to carry out these
style of attacks. I guess this makes
Bett a Sean Hannity diagnosed conspiracy
theorist. Do me a favor first and make
sure that you are subscribed. I am here
after the truth. We aren't blind
followers of any individual. We are God
first, striving to keep America one
nation under God and remain in the
truth. I'm Zach Costello.
Listen to Congressman Tim Burett explain
on the Benny Johnson show how the lone
wolf narrative, including as it relates
to Tyler Robinson in the Charlie Kurt
case, is almost never true. This is how
government operatives, foreign and
domestic, do it. If you thought this was
fairy tale fiction, you're very wrong
and you need to wake up.
>> I think that mo what most people are
asking is how is it possible that some
degenerate
spectrum autistic loner who doesn't have
any friends, didn't speak to any
>> always a loner. Always a loner. They
never, you know, no contact. Remember
they said that about um
>> Thomas Krooks. Yeah.
>> Tyler Robinson.
Yeah.
>> Yeah. Parents didn't know what he was
doing. didn't know that. You know, same
deal. Same deal. It's always follows the
pattern. Again,
I say this a lot and I get labeled a
lot, but I think you've got
organizations that um that, you know,
they they were sued for it once before.
You know, I've had this conversation. I
think it was the CIA was sued. They
said, "Oh, we don't do mind control, all
that stuff." Then they got in a lawsuit
and they got their butts sued. And then
they said, "Well, we do it. We did it,
but we don't do it anymore." So, were
you lying then? Are you lying now? Are
you still lying? Which I think they're
still lying. And, you know, they they
put this garbage out to the, you know,
and through the way that, you know, the
airwaves on the internet. It's pretty
simple. Um, how they do it and they and
they target these individuals. And I
think that's how they do it. I think
they they expect this thing to happen
and somebody is is is pumping this
garbage out.
>> What this is specifically called is
covert influence. The CIA has lied about
using it and then admitted to doing it.
As Bashett explains here, this is used
by America and it's used by governments
around the world to influence certain
outcomes in whatever country they are
operating within. In this specific case
of Tyler Robinson, multiple people
online knew that something was going to
happen. On September 10th, foreign
military contractors arrived in Provo
the week leading up to the
assassination. A disproportionate number
of foreign registered cell phones were
located at the UVU event when Charlie
was killed. A decoy sprang up right
after the shot was taken. Tyler Robinson
was radicalized quickly in the months
leading up to the assassination. This
Turning Point USA event was planned at
the last minute with insufficient
security and emergency protocols because
of how Turning Point USA completed forms
for UVU. I'm going to cover that here in
a second and it's very disturbing which
you'll see. But as far as I'm concerned,
it is more likely that this was a
coordinated hit involving multiple
people than not. So now it's just a
matter of foreign or domestic covert
influence. If Tyler Robinson pulled the
trigger, as I've said, fine. I just want
the truth. Who influenced him, though?
and who was he working with? This is
what I and everyone else should care
about. Period. And getting to the truth,
the full truth of this matter is of
highest priority regardless of the
political and global consequences.
Israel, for example, had a lot to lose
if Charlie and Turning Point USA had
turned against them. And they had a lot
to gain if Turning Point USA continued
to lead the pro-Israel agenda in
America. The left had a lot to gain with
Charlie Kirk out of the way. After all,
he and Turning Point USA just got Trump
elected president. Turning Point USA is
not some small business. It is a big
money, big power organization with a lot
at stake. And the very influential
founder of said organization was
assassinated. When President Trump was
almost killed in Butler, Pennsylvania,
we demanded the Secret Service be held
accountable. The director stepped down.
We wanted heads to roll for the
incompetence and we wanted
investigations into any willful
negligence. Why is this unacceptable to
do when it comes to TurningPoint USA?
Why does this make you a vile evil
conspiracy theorist as Sean Hannity, who
apparently is right about everything,
says that you are? Listen, this is a
perfect setup in context for what
Candace pushed back on against Erica and
the failures of Turning Point USA that
day Charlie was killed. You know, I've
been doing TV and radio now for 30 plus
years, and you know that on this show,
we more often than not, we end up
putting facts first, and we're way ahead
of the curve, and we get it right when
the legacy media mob so often gets
things wrong. Um, and you know, on this
program, I believe every word I say
there, we are very transparent what we
do. But in today's internet age, where I
guess anybody can have their own talk
show, where everything's about clicks,
everything's about money, everything's
about views, a lot of people out there,
they don't seem to have any issue with
spewing the most incendiary, hateful,
outrageous, conspiratorial comments that
they can dream up. And somehow someway,
some of the people who traffic in this
kind of hatred and talk have actually
decided to turn the tragic political
assassination of Charlie Kirk into their
latest topic of fascination with a
variety of absolutely insane conspiracy
theories. Uh some people are even trying
to figure out where Charlie Kirk is
buried. Does it get any more evil, any
sicker than this? Well, not to me. I
find all of this disgusting and
repulsive. Erica, her children, the
people at Turning Point, they have been
through enough this year. It is time for
people to shut up and leave these people
alone.
>> Quick Google search. What did Sean
Hannity say and do about the COVID
vaccine?
In July of 2021, Hannity told his
viewers, "Please take CO seriously. I
can't say it enough. Enough people have
died. We don't need any more death. He
added, I believe in science. I believe
in the science of vaccination. And he
said, absolutely makes sense for many
Americans to get vaccinated. He ended up
getting the vaccine. Hm. I just cannot
understand for the life of me and
especially after CO and all we've been
through with the authorities and the
elites and what you just heard from
Congressman Tim Burett. Why these people
cannot remain skeptical and open-minded.
Arrogance I know better and you don't
get to ask questions never plays. And
this is what Candace gets at here
against Erica. We'll get to that right
after a quick break here for our
sponsors that are keeping this channel
independent and allowing me to do this
full-time. The wellness company sponsors
this channel, guys. And you know that
stubborn ache that never quite goes
away. The one that ice, heat, or pain
pills barely touch? What if you could
target it at the cellular level instead
of just numbing it? That's exactly what
TheraBlue was designed to do. TheraBlue
is a next generation pain relieving
peptide gel that works deeper than the
skin's surface. Powered by Aqua
Molecular Delivery Technology, it
delivers peptides and botanicals
directly into muscle tissue for legit
lasting relief. Its hero ingredient,
copper peptide, promotes collagen
synthesis, reduces inflammation, and
helps accelerate repair. NAD+
restores cellular energy to aid
recovery, while methylene blue protects
your mitochondria and supports
endurance. I am all about mitochondrial
health. That is important. Natural
extracts like MSM, turmeric, white
willow bark, arnica, and ginger soothe
inflammation. While menthol, camfor, and
eucalyptus oil deliver instant cooling
relief. It absorbs fast and leaves your
skin refreshed, not greasy. Apply a thin
layer, massage until absorb, and let
your body experience lasting recovery.
Get 10% off by visiting twwc.health/zac.
That's twwc.althzac.
and use the code Zach Z A C H to get
that 10% off. Move freely again with the
blue. Now, let's get back into the show.
Okay, so Candace Owens issued a response
after Erica Kirk called her out on Fox
News for profiting off of her
investigation into the Charlie Kirk
assassination and for attacking her
family, who Erica included as the people
who work at Turning Point USA. This
clip, which is pretty hilarious to
start, I thought was Candace's most
effective argument against Erica,
especially given what I'm going to show
you after this about the people at
Turning Point USA and how they failed to
protect Charlie. Listen.
>> WHOA. [screaming]
WHOA. ERICA KIRK SHUTS DOWN the con. No,
she didn't even respond to one of the
conspiracies. She gave us emotion. She
gave us emotion. She said, "I'm a
mother. I am a wife." And we never asked
about whether she was mother or wife. We
want to know if she is a CEO and a
chairman. And a CEO and a chairman has
to compartmentalize. A CEO and a
chairman cannot respond to valid
questions and critiques about finances,
about shady actions that are being taken
by people that require presidential
pardons. People that are meaningfully
asking uh why we are not getting a clear
answer of what took place in September
10th. CEO, okay, does not get to respond
and say, "That's my family, okay? That's
my that's my that is what I that's the
energy of what I would expect from a
mother speaking to a teacher, which I I
was this mom." Like, that's my kid.
Okay. And there we'll shut this down
right now. That's my child. This is not
a child. Turning Point USA is an
organization. And Erica already had an
uphill battle to climb. like that. She
had to climb this because, by the way,
just because if if this was Goldman
Sachs and the president of Goldman Sachs
or managing director over at Goldman
Sachs died in a horrifically violent
way, the Goldman Sachs family
uh might mourn for a couple of months,
but they would have instantly had
someone to replace that individual. And
beyond that, they would have never
accepted
the the public and and the people that
um are investing money. They would have
never accepted, well, he's gone, but
here's his wife. She already had an up
hill to climb here, right? Like this
does not make you qualified because you
love someone to take on their job. I am
not qualified to do what my husband
does. That's why I said I would I
wouldn't want to be the CEO and the
chairman of a company. Actually, there's
a great clip of uh Jordan Peterson
asking that very question. Like, why do
women want to be like, why would you
want to have it's actually a lot of work
and it's very stressful and it's a lot
of numbers and you're crunching numbers
and you have to be everywhere. Okay, if
you want that, great. If you built the
company and you're in the room like
Charlie Kirk did and you have proven to
the public like, hey, I built this
company. I didn't even go to college and
I've been doing this for over a decade
as Charlie Kirk did. You've earned that
street cred. Okay, so she already had a
hill decline because now they're saying,
"Well, this is his wife." And so,
you know, that's it. Well, now you're
going to have to prove that you have the
ability to be a CEO and a chairman and
not just a wife who we expect emotion
from. And you have you're rightful in
that capacity. You are rightful to have
emotion. You are rightful to be the
agrieved widow, but you don't get to
just be widowed into the position of
chairman and CEO. don't get to respond
to well in this case investors, donors
who have given money and are asking
meaningful questions with no you don't
you you you don't you don't get replies
right now cuz this this is the Charlie
Kirk show fam doesn't work this way.
>> Two things can be true at once. Erica is
a grieving widow and mother and she is
not making the right decisions as the
CEO of a massive and powerful company
that her husband built and is currently
under the microscope because he was
assassinated and people want answers.
Just because Charlie wanted Erica as the
CEO and the Turning Point USA board
voted her in does not mean that that was
a prudent decision. We can talk about
this objectively and separately from her
being a grieving widow and mother. If
she wants to be a grieving widow and
mother, that's fine. Then what she
should have done maybe is hire an
interim CEO to cover this period. But
Candace is right. Now she is the CEO of
this company. And this company, like I
said, is under the microscope because of
what happened.
as an effective and competent CEO of
Turning Point, given that its leader was
assassinated and they failed to protect
him, wouldn't you, for example, do an
internal investigation to find the
failures? Or maybe see if someone
planned or leaked the location of the
event to one of those domestic or
foreign operatives that could have been
involved, that were likely involved.
Like, wouldn't we want full
accountability and transparency instead
of just calling them your family, which
is cute. Why would we just not want to
find who dropped the ball on this? This
is from a viral video that was
supposedly debunking Candace and her
receipts. It didn't land as expected.
Listen. Now, let's talk about the
ambulance. Candace finds it suspicious
that there was no ambulance on standby
at the event. Typically, uh, the states
dictate the protocol and you're required
to after you have a certain number of
attendees at an event, you are required
to have an ambulance on standby. And I
don't know Utah state law. Uh, but I
also found that that weird uh that there
wouldn't have been an ambulance on
standby. Again, correct me if I'm wrong.
Uh, but seemed atypical to me.
>> She's right to raise this because that
is a genuine failure and Turning Point
bears significant responsibility for it.
But that could just be incompetence, not
malevolence. Here's another way to look
at it. The Turning Point student chapter
at UVU, the campus club that organized
the event, filled out the planning
forms. They initially estimated 200
attendees. That low estimate didn't
trigger UVU's major events assessment
committee, the body that would have
required enhanced security and medical
coverage for large gatherings. Now, they
eventually revised the form to estimate
that 600 students would come. And they
did that based on a neighboring school's
Turning Point event the previous year
that did draw about 600. Later, Turning
Point corporate got involved and told
the students to revise expectations
to,500 to 2,000 people and it was still
wrong because over 3,000 people showed
up. The result was that only two EMTs
were on site and there was no dedicated
ambulance for a crowd five times larger
than anyone planned for. So, was that
negligent? Arguably, yes. Turning Point
Corporate should have ensured that
proper protocols were followed. UVU
systems should have caught this. The
student organizers were in over their
heads. This event at UVU was planned
abnormally late for Turning Point USA
events. UVU also told Turning Point USA
staff the amphitheater location was not
a good idea and could not be protected
properly. Someone made the call on that
location anyways. And whoever at
TurningPoint USA completed the forms,
severely undersshot the crowd size,
which dictated the emergency services
that were present. And even after
revisions made by Turning Point USA
corporate, they undersshot the
attendance by half, reporting that 1500
to a,000 would be there, over 3,000
people attended this event. And this
undershooting prevented an ambulance
from being able to be present. Charlie's
head of security told UVU police that he
was concerned about the rooftops in
front of Charlie. The UVU police said
they had it covered, but Charlie's
security staff never followed up on
this. All of this to say, this is at
least negligence and incompetence by
multiple staff at Turning Point USA,
which resulted in the death of Charlie
Kirk, and people should be held
accountable for it. At worst, well, this
is why people have questions and are
unhappy about their behavior in the
aftermath and are unhappy about answers
like the ones that Erica Kirk, the CEO
of Turning Point USA, gave all of us. It
doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist.
It just makes you a reality observer.
I'm Zach Costello.