2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Explains Why America Needs an Immigration Moratorium to Put Citizens First
Charlie Kirk responds to a question about legal immigration reform with a perspective that challenges conventional thinking. While agreeing that the current Green Card and citizenship process has problems, Kirk argues the solution isn't necessarily making it easier to enter America. Instead, he advocates for an immigration moratorium to allow assimilation, pointing to the 1950s and early 1960s when America dramatically reduced immigration to prioritize post-World War II veterans. Kirk contends that legal immigration should be evaluated through one lens: does it benefit existing citizens and those who share Western values?
During a question and answer session, Charlie Kirk was asked about his earlier statement that one in five people in the country will be illegal in three years. The questioner suggested that while securing borders is important, making the legal immigration process easier might also help address the situation. Kirk's response challenged this common assumption.
Kirk acknowledged partial agreement but pushed back on the premise that America must make it easier for people to enter the country. He called for an immigration moratorium, arguing that America has "way too many people coming into America" and needs to "throttle back and digest the meal" to allow proper assimilation to happen.
Historical Precedent: Learning from the 1950s
Kirk pointed to a specific historical example to support his position. In the 1950s and early 1960s, America reduced immigration to almost zero despite plenty of people wanting to come to the country. Post-World War II, with Europe destroyed, there was no shortage of potential immigrants. However, American leadership made a deliberate choice.
"They said we have a moral obligation to World War II veterans to make sure they have good wages, good jobs, and we're going to deliver for them," Kirk explained. "That was a moral argument." This historical precedent demonstrates that controlling immigration levels based on the needs of existing citizens is not unprecedented in American history.
The Principle: Immigration Should Benefit Citizens
Kirk articulated a clear principle for evaluating legal immigration policy: "Legal immigration should always be viewed through the prism: does it benefit the country and the citizens that are already here?" He clarified that he's not opposed to legal immigration as a concept, acknowledging it "could be a phenomenal asset to America and it has been a phenomenal asset." The question is about timing and priorities.
His argument centers on the idea that America has a primary obligation to its current citizens before expanding to accommodate newcomers. This doesn't mean legal immigration should never increase again, but that the current pace is unsustainable for proper integration and assimilation.
Problems with the Current Legal Immigration System
Kirk identified a fundamental flaw in how America's legal immigration system currently operates: "We prioritize the people that don't share Western values and we don't bring the people that could potentially share Western values." He used Minneapolis as his primary example of what he sees as a failed immigration policy.
"Have you been to Minneapolis in the last five years? It is unrecognizable," Kirk stated. He pointed specifically to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar as emblematic of the problem, describing her as "the mascot for immigration moratorium." Kirk noted that Omar, despite being "rescued in a Kenyan refugee camp and brought in by our own benevolence," has "nothing but negative, vile, mean things to say about America."
This contrast particularly frustrated Kirk: "When you come into this country and you have someone like Ilhan Omar that talks endlessly about how awful America is despite being a beneficiary of the generosity and benevolence of America, I say there's something fundamentally wrong with that."
Not About Race, About Values
Kirk was careful to clarify that his position is not racial in nature. "That's not a racial thing by the way, at all whatsoever," he emphasized. "I believe that Cubans can make some of, have, and will make, and do make the greatest Americans in America."
He contrasted problematic cases with "some amazing immigrants that come here legally that learn the pledge and they mesh beautifully into American society." The distinction Kirk drew was based on values, not ethnicity or national origin. The question he posed was whether immigration is "actually making America more free and fulfilling our obligation to our fellow countrymen."
Current Scale of Legal Immigration
Kirk highlighted the current scale of legal immigration through the Green Card system: "A million people coming in every single year." His alternative vision focuses on selectivity: "I want people that fit into the American experiment, fit into the story."
His criteria for evaluating potential immigrants includes whether they speak the language, agree with Western values, and believe in the Constitution. Kirk argued that the current approach of "opening your borders, say anyone can come for any reason whatsoever regardless if they speak the language, regardless if they agree with Western values, regardless of their belief in the Constitution" is fundamentally wrong.
Taking Generosity for Granted
Kirk concluded with a broader observation about how American generosity has been treated: "Our generosity has been taken advantage over the last 20 years." This statement encapsulated his view that America's openness has not always been met with the gratitude and assimilation that should be expected.
"It's destroying the country from within, it is," Kirk warned, again pointing to Minneapolis and Ilhan Omar's election to public office as evidence of his concerns. His final message was direct: "It's time we put our citizens first."
Kirk acknowledged that his position draws significant criticism: "What I just said I get attacked wildly for. I don't care, it's true and someone needs to say it." He framed his stance as necessary truth-telling in an environment where discussing immigration priorities openly has become controversial.
