Joe Kent Reveals He Was Stopped from Investigating Potential Foreign Involvement in Charlie Kirk Assassination

[00:00] And last time I saw Charlie Kirk on this

[00:01] earth was in in June

[00:05] in in the in the West Wing in the

[00:07] stairway and I said hi to him and he

[00:09] looked me in the eye and he said very

[00:11] loudly and it's a small you've been in

[00:12] the West Wing it's it's small

[00:14] it's a tight space and and he said Joe

[00:16] stopped us from getting into a war with

[00:18] Iran.

[00:19] Very loudly.

[00:19] >> He was single-minded.

[00:20] >> walked off and he went I believe into

[00:22] the Oval.

[00:23] So when one of President Trump's closest

[00:26] advisers who is vocally advocating

[00:29] for us to not go to war with Iran and

[00:32] for us to rethink at least our

[00:33] relationship with the Israelis.

[00:36] And then he suddenly publicly

[00:38] assassinated and we're not allowed to

[00:40] ask any questions about that.

[00:43] It's data point. It's a data point that

[00:45] we need to look into. What do you mean

[00:47] when you say we're not allowed to ask

[00:48] any questions about that? We've we've

[00:51] been told that this individual

[00:54] Robinson is a lone gunman and maybe he

[00:56] is.

[00:57] But the investigation that that I was a

[01:00] part of the National Counterterrorism

[01:01] Center was a part of we were stopped

[01:03] from continuing to investigate and the

[01:04] FBI will say that that they stopped that

[01:06] because

[01:08] they wanted to have to every turn

[01:09] everything over to the Utah state

[01:11] authorities and everything's going to

[01:12] trial it's very very sensitive.

[01:14] But there was still a lot for us to look

[01:15] into that I I I can't really get into

[01:17] but there was still linkage for us to

[01:20] investigate that we needed to run down

[01:22] and I'm not making any conclusions I'm

[01:23] not saying

[01:25] because you know because of this this

[01:27] happened I'm not I'm not saying that at

[01:28] all I'm just saying there's unanswered

[01:29] questions. We know the pressure because

[01:31] of the text messages text messages that

[01:33] have been made public that Charlie was

[01:35] under a lot of pressure from a lot of

[01:37] pro-Israel donors and again we know

[01:39] Charlie was advocating to President

[01:41] Trump against this war

[01:43] with Iran and we knew at the end of the

[01:45] 12-day war at the end of midnight hammer

[01:46] that the Israelis were going to come

[01:47] back and ask us to go back to war

[01:50] again. Right.

[01:51] So we have a lot of data points between

[01:53] Butler the assassination attempts

[01:54] against President Trump the breaches of

[01:56] his security, what happened to Charlie

[01:57] Kirk.

[02:01] Now, of course, this instantly began

[02:03] trending. It's shocking. You have

[02:05] somebody who is the director, former

[02:07] director,

[02:09] of national counterterrorism telling you

[02:11] that he was

[02:12] somebody stopped him. He was stopped

[02:14] from investigating whether or not there

[02:16] could have been any foreign leads or

[02:17] foreign involvement. He says, "I don't

[02:18] know for sure, but I do know that we had

[02:21] things that we would have investigated

[02:22] had not been for Kash Patel." Now, we

[02:24] had already knew had known rather that

[02:26] something was brewing between him and

[02:28] Kash Patel, right? That made it into the

[02:29] Daily Mail at some point. We had covered

[02:31] it.

[02:32] You would think

[02:33] you would think that him sitting down

[02:35] with Tucker and revealing this would

[02:37] shock the senses of Turning Point USA.

[02:40] That it would shock the senses senses of

[02:41] his wife. They would go, "What? Get Kash

[02:44] on the phone immediately. I need to

[02:45] speak to Kash Patel. I need to know why

[02:47] he was stopped.

[02:49] Uh why Joe Kent was stopped from

[02:51] investigating. I demand to know why this

[02:53] happened."

[02:55] And then they should further demand that

[02:57] investigation to take place, right? Was

[02:59] there foreign involvement?

[03:01] But that's of course not what is going

[03:03] to happen following the his appearance.

[03:05] That's never how it works at Turning

[03:07] Point USA. They always forget how to

[03:09] just pretend that they aren't guilty.

[03:12] You know what I mean? They just don't

[03:13] know how to act surprised or dismayed

[03:16] or uh concerned that there could have

[03:19] been foreign involvement. They always do

[03:20] the opposite thing that the rest of the

[03:22] world is doing, right?

[03:24] And this time they're angry at Joe Kent.

[03:27] The Israel first crowd, like I said,

[03:28] immediately began demanding that he

[03:30] spend time in prison for leaking what

[03:32] they claimed are classified documents.

[03:35] Alex Clark, best known for posing in

[03:38] high boots on top of Charlie's vigil

[03:39] site just a mere days after uh he was

[03:42] assassinated, she had this to say on X.

[03:44] She said, "Joe Kent is clearly no friend

[03:47] to Charlie as he has actively

[03:49] participated and or egged on behind the

[03:53] scenes in the degradation of his wife.

[03:55] How anyone could defend him in any way

[03:57] after that disgusts me. Fake friends.

[04:00] Obviously, what's missing from that is

[04:01] any proof, right? I have never heard

[04:04] from any person that Joe Kent egged on

[04:06] anyone going after Erica Kirk. In fact,

[04:07] in terms of public commentators who have

[04:10] gone after Erica Kirk, I actually if

[04:12] they normally loop me in with Tucker

[04:14] Carlson, Megyn Kelly, I stand alone in

[04:17] that group. Tucker Carlson has said he's

[04:19] a friend of Erica Kirk. Kelly has said

[04:20] she's a friend of Erica Kirk. Joe Kent,

[04:22] I have never heard

[04:24] utter a bad word about Erica Kirk. So,

[04:27] is Turning Point going to supply any

[04:28] receipts for the fact that he egged on

[04:30] something that was harmful uh to Erica

[04:33] Kirk?

[04:34] Jack Posobiec, who uh works with Turning

[04:37] Point USA in a lot of different ways,

[04:39] but also is military and has served the

[04:41] country, and therefore, like most

[04:43] military men, respect Joe Kent's

[04:45] accomplishment. He came under fire for

[04:47] merely listing absent any commentary Joe

[04:50] Kent's qualifications and his background

[04:52] having served this country. This is what

[04:54] uh Jack Posobiec wrote, and I'm going to

[04:56] show you how Laura Loomer responded. She

[04:58] He wrote, "Joe Kent has six Bronze Star

[05:00] medals with five oak leaf clusters

[05:02] across 11 combat deployments as a Green

[05:05] Beret in some of the biggest battles of

[05:07] the GWOT."

[05:08] And this they were infuriated. You

[05:10] should see the comments under this. They

[05:11] couldn't stand this. Don't you cannot

[05:12] say anything good about Joe Kent. Laura

[05:15] jumps in and says, "Why are you

[05:17] defending a known leaker who is

[05:19] undermining President Trump? There is

[05:21] now speculation that Joe Kent may have

[05:23] been leaking information to Candace

[05:25] Owens for the purpose of attacking Mrs.

[05:28] Erica Kirk. What are you doing?" Okay, I

[05:30] can tell you right now that that is

[05:32] completely untrue. Joe Kent did not leak

[05:34] me anything for the purpose of attacking

[05:37] Erica Kirk. But, here is what's even

[05:39] more interesting, okay?

[05:41] They don't realize that they're implying

[05:44] that Erica Kirk is guilty of something.

[05:47] Right? Let's Let's actually imagine what

[05:49] they're saying is true. Like Joe Kent,

[05:51] let's say Joe Kent is the one that

[05:53] leaked me crucial information regarding

[05:55] Charlie Kirk, okay?

[05:57] And the investigation.

[06:00] Well, how could that hurt Erica Kirk?

[06:02] That should hurt

[06:04] the Feds if they're lying. It could only

[06:06] hurt someone who is lying to the public

[06:09] about what actually occurred on that

[06:11] day. The implication is that him leaking

[06:15] something harmed Erica Kirk. They're not

[06:17] saying he is a liar, they are saying he

[06:19] is a leaker. I find that to be

[06:20] interesting and they never think through

[06:22] their attacks.

[06:23] So, we got to figure out what it is what

[06:25] is they're talking about. Why are they

[06:26] so upset about what Joe Kent said? How

[06:28] could this harm Erica? Well, we finally

[06:30] were able to determine what it is that

[06:31] they're talking about because

[06:34] Andrew Kolvet addressed the claims

[06:36] directly today on Charlie Kirk's radio

[06:38] show. Take a listen.

[06:40] Uh the

[06:42] central claim though that I want to get

[06:44] to is was

[06:46] Joe Kent leaking certain information.

[06:49] And over the weekend a clip came up and

[06:52] it's gone a little bit viral. I want to

[06:54] address it. Let's go ahead and play it,

[06:55] cut 16.

[06:57] The way that those

[06:58] screenshots got to Candace

[07:02] is via Joe Kent. Andrew Kolvet Andrew

[07:06] was in the chat group as well. He was

[07:08] one of the nine people in the group and

[07:10] he admitted at first

[07:12] to be perfectly honest, at first he was

[07:14] denying it. He didn't know how Candace

[07:15] got them, but then he admitted on the

[07:17] air on his show

[07:19] that he had given these text messages

[07:20] and he gave them

[07:23] to

[07:24] He said that on the show that he gave

[07:26] them to someone in the government. He

[07:27] told us that that he gave them to

[07:29] someone in the government. Joe Kent

[07:31] was someone that we

[07:34] we knew that there was a relationship

[07:36] there between Charlie and Andrew and

[07:37] Joe.

[07:38] We knew that when Charlie would visit

[07:40] Washington D.C. he would talk to Joe. We

[07:42] kind of verified that the messages had

[07:45] been given by Andrew to Joe Kent

[07:48] and that Joe Kent had been the one to

[07:49] pass them on to Candace.

[07:51] All right. So, verified's doing a lot of

[07:54] heavy lifting there. I do want to

[07:56] confirm what I can confirm and that is

[07:58] that yes, in the immediate aftermath, I

[08:01] did provide the group chat to Joe Kent.

[08:03] Um

[08:05] I we don't throw around accusations

[08:07] recklessly here. We don't. There's a lot

[08:09] of people that do that online. We don't

[08:11] do that. We think that's keeping in the

[08:13] spirit of Charlie spirit

[08:15] and the way we choose to do things is we

[08:17] try and be responsible. So, yes, in a

[08:20] spirit of looking at every lead, turning

[08:22] over every stone, we wanted everybody

[08:24] that needed to know to know anything

[08:27] that we knew. Not just I mean and by the

[08:29] way, we've been accused of not being

[08:31] interested in the truth.

[08:32] >> And just to remind people what this is

[08:33] referring to, this is after

[08:37] Charlie's murder, there were text

[08:39] messages that from a private group chat

[08:41] >> Yep. that were made public and were used

[08:45] to frankly kick off

[08:48] the big conspiracy theory that we've run

[08:50] into over and over again, which is that

[08:54] Israel or the Jews had Charlie murdered.

[08:56] >> Yes.

[08:57] So, which we do not believe.

[08:59] >> Which we do not believe, but we have

[09:01] been accused of trying to or we're not

[09:03] interested in the truth. The The actual

[09:06] fact of the matter is that behind the

[09:08] scenes, we have given everything we know

[09:10] to give. Every single piece of

[09:11] information. This was one of them. I was

[09:13] told I could trust Joe Kent. I provided

[09:16] the screen grabs to Joe Kent and the I

[09:19] don't know what happened to them at that

[09:21] point. Okay, that I just want to make

[09:23] that very clear.

[09:24] Eventually,

[09:26] Joe did message me and suggest that I

[09:29] make those screen grabs public. I

[09:31] declined because those were shared

[09:33] privately.

[09:35] I didn't want to be reckless with them

[09:36] in the public. There could be innocent

[09:37] people on that group chat that would

[09:39] then be harmed. So, I declined. But

[09:42] then, fast forward another week or two,

[09:45] and they were made public. So, that's

[09:47] what I know is that Joe suggested that

[09:49] they be made public.

[09:51] I declined, then they were made public.

[09:53] Can I 100% categorically say that he

[09:57] leaked them? No. But, those are the

[09:59] facts. Maybe somebody on his team, maybe

[10:01] they got passed around, maybe somebody

[10:02] else leaked them.

[10:04] But, that's that those are the facts of

[10:06] the matter, and that's what I know.

[10:08] Yeah, the part that Andrew's just

[10:10] forgetting to add there is that he

[10:11] himself told me about the text chain.

[10:14] Andrew was telling multiple people about

[10:16] the text text text chain, and I'm so

[10:19] glad that he is telling the truth that

[10:21] this was going around. And this is their

[10:23] this is their bone to pick with Joe

[10:25] Kent. This is what put a bee in their

[10:27] bonnets. This is what has upset Turning

[10:29] Point USA. As a refresher, Turning Point

[10:33] chose to stay entirely mum on the topic

[10:36] of Charlie's support for Israel, instead

[10:38] allowed a force of Zionists, who were

[10:40] harassing him in his last days, Zionists

[10:42] like Josh Hammer, to lie about what

[10:45] Charlie was going through, right? So, I

[10:48] came out and told the truth. Meghan

[10:50] Kelly came out and told the truth.

[10:51] Tucker came out and told the truth. He

[10:52] was having changing opinions on Israel.

[10:54] Now, we're way far down, we know how

[10:55] true that is. Brett Weinstein has

[10:57] released his messages about Iran. You

[10:59] hear Joe Kent telling you the last time

[11:01] he saw him in the White House, he said

[11:02] that everybody knew this.

[11:04] And Turning Point did not confirm it,

[11:06] and allowed Zionists to lie about that.

[11:08] Then, I released the concrete proof in

[11:11] the form of the text chain, which then

[11:12] forced them to confess confess that

[11:14] there was a communication that took

[11:15] place less than 24 hours before Charlie

[11:18] was shot and killed. And more crucially,

[11:21] it was a communication that took place

[11:22] shortly before Charlie began texting his

[11:25] security and Andrew Kolvet, which he

[11:27] also told me about, that he thought they

[11:28] were going to kill him. Okay? Something

[11:30] that Erica initially denied to the

[11:32] public.

[11:33] So, what we have here is that Turning

[11:35] Point is angry because this made both

[11:36] them and the new CEO and chairman, who

[11:39] also happens to be Charlie Kirk's wife,

[11:41] look bad. Right? Liars hate when they

[11:44] get caught, but narcissistic liars,

[11:46] rather than repenting when they get

[11:47] caught, get angry. And they seek revenge

[11:50] on the people who exposed their lies.

[11:52] They never feel any shame. Okay, they

[11:54] don't possess any shame. The rabbi is

[11:55] not ashamed that he lied and said,

[11:57] "Charlie never blinked on Israel." He's

[11:59] not ashamed that he lied. He's angry he

[12:01] got caught.