Joe Kent Reveals He Was Stopped from Investigating Potential Foreign Involvement in Charlie Kirk Assassination
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Dave Smith Reveals Private Texts from Charlie Kirk About Israel and Douglas Murray Debate Aftermath
34:25
Dave Smith and Nick Fuentes Reveal the Truth About Charlie Kirk's Final Stance on Israel
30:01
Josh Hammer's Suspicious Public Execution Tweet 16 Hours Before Charlie Kirk's Assassination Sparks Investigation
27:29
Joe Kent Reveals He Was Stopped from Investigating Potential Foreign Involvement in Charlie Kirk Assassination
Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, disclosed in an interview with Tucker Carlson that he was prevented from continuing his investigation into potential foreign connections surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination. Kent described his final encounter with Kirk in the West Wing, where Kirk loudly stated that Kent had stopped the U.S. from going to war with Iran. Kent revealed that despite unanswered questions and leads to pursue, the investigation was halted, allegedly by Kash Patel. Rather than demanding answers, Turning Point USA and Kirk's associates responded with anger toward Kent, accusing him of leaking information that exposed inconsistencies in their public statements about Kirk's final days and his evolving views on Israel.
Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center, recounted his last meeting with Charlie Kirk in June at the West Wing. As Kent walked through the tight stairway, Kirk looked him in the eye and loudly proclaimed, "Joe stopped us from getting into a war with Iran." Kent noted that Kirk was single-minded in this conviction and walked off toward the Oval Office immediately after making the statement.
Kent emphasized the significance of this encounter, describing Kirk as one of President Trump's closest advisers who was vocally advocating against war with Iran and for rethinking the U.S. relationship with Israel. When someone in that position is suddenly assassinated, Kent argued, and the public is discouraged from asking questions, it becomes a data point worth investigating.
When asked what he meant by saying "we're not allowed to ask any questions," Kent explained that authorities quickly identified the shooter, Robinson, as a lone gunman. However, the investigation that Kent and the National Counterterrorism Center were conducting was stopped before completion. The FBI claimed they halted the investigation to turn everything over to Utah state authorities because the case was going to trial and was very sensitive.
Kent stressed that there was still linkage to investigate and leads to run down that he couldn't fully discuss. He clarified he wasn't making conclusions or claiming cause and effect, but simply stating there were unanswered questions. These questions became more pressing given the text messages that had been made public showing Kirk was under significant pressure from pro-Israel donors. Kent noted that Kirk had been advocating to President Trump against war with Iran, and everyone knew that after the 12-day war and midnight hammer operations ended, the Israelis would ask the U.S. to go back to war.
Kent connected multiple data points: the Butler incident, assassination attempts against President Trump, breaches of his security, and what happened to Charlie Kirk. He stated that Kash Patel was the person who stopped the investigation from continuing.
Turning Point USA's Response
Kent's revelation on Tucker Carlson's program began trending immediately. Rather than expressing shock or demanding answers from Kash Patel about why the investigation was stopped, Turning Point USA and Kirk's wife Erika Kirk responded with anger directed at Kent himself. Critics noted that the natural response would have been to demand the investigation continue and to seek explanations for why it was halted, especially given the potential for foreign involvement.
The Israel-first crowd immediately began demanding Kent spend time in prison for allegedly leaking classified documents. Alex Clark, known for controversial photos at Kirk's vigil site, wrote on X that Kent "is clearly no friend to Charlie as he has actively participated and or egged on behind the scenes in the degradation of his wife." However, no evidence was provided to support these claims. In fact, Kent has never publicly spoken negatively about Erika Kirk, unlike other commentators who have addressed the situation.
Attacks on Kent's Credibility
Jack Posobiec, who works with Turning Point USA and has military background, came under fire simply for listing Kent's qualifications and service record. Posobiec wrote that Kent has "six Bronze Star medals with five oak leaf clusters across 11 combat deployments as a Green Beret in some of the biggest battles of the GWOT." Even this factual statement drew outrage from critics who insisted nothing positive should be said about Kent.
Laura Loomer responded to Posobiec asking, "Why are you defending a known leaker who is undermining President Trump? There is now speculation that Joe Kent may have been leaking information to Candace Owens for the purpose of attacking Mrs. Erika Kirk." Owens has denied receiving any leaked information from Kent for the purpose of attacking Erika Kirk.
Observers noted that the accusation itself carries an interesting implication: if Kent leaked information about the investigation, how would that harm Erika Kirk unless she had been dishonest with the public? The criticism frames Kent not as a liar but as a leaker, suggesting the information he shared was true but damaging because it exposed inconsistencies in official accounts.
Andrew Kolvet Addresses the Controversy
Andrew Kolvet addressed Kent's claims directly on Charlie Kirk's radio show, focusing on allegations that Kent leaked text messages from a private group chat. Kolvet confirmed that in the immediate aftermath of Kirk's death, he provided the group chat screenshots to Joe Kent. He explained this was done in the spirit of investigating every lead and turning over every stone, ensuring that everyone who needed information had access to what they knew.
The text messages in question were from a private group chat that later became public and were used by some to suggest Israeli or Jewish involvement in Kirk's murder—a theory Turning Point USA and Kolvet explicitly reject. Kolvet stated he was told he could trust Kent and provided him with the screen grabs, though he didn't know what happened to them afterward. Kent later suggested Kolvet make the screenshots public, but Kolvet declined because they were shared privately and could harm innocent people in the group chat.
Kolvet noted that a week or two after he declined, the messages were made public anyway. While he couldn't categorically state that Kent leaked them, he laid out the facts: Kent suggested they be made public, Kolvet declined, and then they appeared publicly. Kolvet acknowledged the messages might have been passed around and leaked by someone else, possibly someone on Kent's team.
The Text Chain and What It Revealed
The controversy surrounding the text chain centers on what it revealed about Kirk's final hours and Turning Point USA's handling of information. According to reports, Turning Point chose to remain silent about Kirk's changing views on Israel and allowed Zionists who had been harassing him, such as Josh Hammer, to lie about what Kirk was experiencing in his final days.
The text chain provided concrete proof that forced Turning Point to confess that a communication took place less than 24 hours before Kirk was shot and killed. More significantly, this communication occurred shortly before Kirk began texting his security and Andrew Kolvet that he thought "they were going to kill him"—something Erika Kirk initially denied to the public.
The release of this information made both Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk, who serves as the organization's new CEO and chairman, look dishonest about their knowledge of Kirk's state of mind and concerns before his death. Rather than addressing these inconsistencies, the organization directed its anger at those who exposed them.
Pattern of Response
Critics argue that Turning Point USA's response follows a pattern where they fail to act surprised or concerned when damaging information emerges. Instead of demanding answers about why the investigation was stopped or whether there was foreign involvement, they attack the credibility of those bringing forward information. The organization appears more focused on protecting its reputation and that of its leadership than on pursuing truth about Kirk's death.
This approach extends to how they handled Kirk's evolving views on Israel. Bret Weinstein has since released messages about Iran, confirming what Joe Kent described. Multiple sources have verified that Kirk was reconsidering U.S. foreign policy positions, yet Turning Point allowed false narratives to persist rather than confirming what they knew to be true.
The situation has created a divide between those demanding full investigation and transparency about Kirk's death and final days, and those prioritizing organizational interests. Kent's willingness to speak publicly about being stopped from investigating has brought attention to questions that remain unanswered about potential foreign connections and the pressure Kirk faced before his assassination.
