[00:00] The fact is that what was happening with
[00:02] Charlie Kirk and it's very well
[00:04] documented is that he was changing his
[00:08] mind in a fundamental way on Israel and
[00:12] Israel's role inside of the United
[00:15] States. So both the lobby or Israel's
[00:18] supporters in the United States and
[00:20] Netanyahu are scrambling to avoid blame
[00:23] for uh this event. John Mirshimer just
[00:27] exposed Charlie Kirk's unmistakable turn
[00:29] against Israel in his final days. And in
[00:32] this clip, he talks about what
[00:34] Netanyahu's response to this tells us
[00:36] about his reputation and what this means
[00:39] for US-Israeli relations going forward.
[00:42] So, let's get his take on this. Please
[00:43] like the video and subscribe to the
[00:45] channel. Why would Netanyahu go on
[00:47] international television
[00:50] before uh Charlie Kirk's killer had even
[00:53] been caught and deny that the Israelis
[00:56] had anything to do with his death? Is
[00:58] their reputation that bad?
[01:01] >> Well, actually,
[01:02] >> that he had to do that.
[01:04] >> The answer is yes. But I would note to
[01:06] you that Max Blumenthal, who has done
[01:09] ymanlike work breaking that story, uh
[01:12] actually put out a tweet today uh that
[01:15] showed that Netanyahu has just issued
[01:19] another statement where he talks about
[01:21] the fact that Israel uh and Charlie Kirk
[01:25] were the best of friends and uh that
[01:28] Israel had absolutely nothing to do with
[01:31] Charlie Kirk's death. Now the question
[01:33] you ask is why is this the case? And the
[01:36] answer is there are three big events in
[01:40] recent American history uh where people
[01:44] believe there was a conspiracy involved
[01:47] and that conspiracy involved Israel. One
[01:50] is the assassination of JFK. Two is what
[01:53] happened at 911 or on 911 and three is
[01:57] the Charlie Kirk killing. This is a huge
[02:00] problem for the Israelis. I'm not saying
[02:02] that the Israelis were involved in any
[02:04] three of those events, but there are a
[02:08] lot of people who believe that the
[02:09] Israelis were involved in Kennedy's
[02:11] assassination, what happened on 911. And
[02:14] by the way, I would note that Tucker
[02:16] Carlson is doing a five-part series.
[02:18] It's due to come out reasonably soon on
[02:21] what happened on 911, and he will make
[02:23] the argument that the Israelis were
[02:25] involved. And then, of course, there's
[02:27] the Charlie Kirk business. and all sorts
[02:29] of people think uh and this is in
[02:31] keeping with Max Blumenthal's superb
[02:34] reporting that uh that the Israelis uh
[02:37] were involved in uh what happened to
[02:40] Charlie Kirk. So,
[02:42] >> okay. So, a few things here. Number one,
[02:44] he's absolutely right about Israel's
[02:46] reputation for assassinations and in
[02:49] particular political assassinations.
[02:51] Just look at the Wikipedia site on this.
[02:53] It became a meme recently when they had
[02:55] to break this down by decade because it
[02:57] involves so many names. Look at this.
[03:01] This is so ridiculous. This is Israeli
[03:04] assassinations that are documented on
[03:07] Wikipedia. And then the last one's of
[03:08] course the assassinations in Doha. So
[03:10] that's true. As far as the things that
[03:13] Mirheimer talked about regarding
[03:15] Kennedy, a lot of people say this is
[03:16] just conspiracies, but it's not without
[03:18] base with Kennedy. He tried to stop
[03:21] Israel from acquiring a nuclear weapon
[03:23] from the United States, essentially
[03:25] stealing it in what's known as the
[03:26] Deamona project in the 1960s. We have
[03:29] communications between him and David
[03:31] Bengurian, you know, substantiating the
[03:34] claims. He tried to stop that just
[03:37] months before his death. And he also
[03:39] tried to get the American Zionist
[03:42] Council to register as a foreign lobby.
[03:44] This was the precursor to APEC. It's
[03:46] what Apac was called before that. So
[03:48] that explains that with 9/11, it's the
[03:50] dancing Israelis. If you don't know
[03:52] about this story, there was a group of
[03:54] Israelis that at least some of them
[03:56] belong to Israeli intelligence under the
[03:59] guise of being in a moving company
[04:02] filming the attacks as they took place,
[04:05] you know, putting up their lighters and
[04:07] kind of celebrating it. And they were
[04:08] held for a time and then, you know, just
[04:12] released. And this was swept under the
[04:13] rug. The mainstream media said
[04:15] everything was a conspiracy theory. And
[04:17] then you have Charlie Kirk. The one
[04:18] thing I want to correct him on though is
[04:21] with the Charlie Kirk thing here, he had
[04:24] said that this sub that Max Blumenthal
[04:27] argued Israeli involvement in Kirk's
[04:29] murder, but he doesn't actually do that.
[04:31] He does talks about the pressures that
[04:33] Charlie Kirk was feeling and the fact
[04:35] that he was frightened of Netanyahu, the
[04:38] fact that he came to believe Netanyahu
[04:40] was a bully and that his highprofile,
[04:43] high rank, high money donors were trying
[04:46] to pressure him to get right back on
[04:48] board and essentially become Ben Shapiro
[04:50] again on in on uh Israel. But he does
[04:53] write that there's no evidence of an
[04:55] Israeli government role in Kirk's
[04:56] assassination. Just wanted to state that
[04:58] for the record. Let's continue. What's
[05:01] happening here is Netanyahu is
[05:03] scrambling and he's scrambling to go to
[05:06] great lengths to distance self distance
[05:09] Israel from what happened uh on u with
[05:13] regard to Charlie Kirk uh and and by the
[05:16] way Bill uh Aman uh who is a mainstream
[05:20] supporter of Israel and was putting
[05:22] pressure on Charlie Kirk as well has
[05:25] gone to great lengths to put out a tweet
[05:27] that uh says he had uh nothing but the
[05:30] highest respect for Charlie Kirk and had
[05:33] a very positive meeting with him and so
[05:35] forth and so on. So both the lobby or
[05:37] Israel's supporters in the United States
[05:39] and Netanyahu are scrambling to avoid
[05:42] blame for uh this event.
[05:45] >> Yeah, no doubt Netanyahu came out right
[05:47] after the fact and said this and then
[05:50] doubled down in another video today
[05:52] responding twice to this. You know, it's
[05:54] because people are pointing fingers at
[05:56] Israel and obviously so after these
[05:58] pieces at the very least raise eyebrows
[06:01] and things that Candace Owens and Tucker
[06:03] Carlson have said about this and the
[06:06] fact that Charlie Kirk was feeling
[06:07] pressured. He was on the Megan Kelly
[06:09] show about a month ago talking about the
[06:11] pressure he was feeling and the
[06:13] frustration of having his character
[06:15] called into question over this. So yeah,
[06:18] Mirheimer's exactly right. And who did
[06:19] Netanyahu blame for this murder right
[06:21] away? Like he always does, radical
[06:24] Islamists. Right after this happened,
[06:27] before there was a suspect, before any
[06:29] suspect was apprehended or indicted, he
[06:32] blamed radical Islamists. If you don't
[06:34] believe me, take a look at that Greta
[06:35] Van Sustran interview. And then there
[06:37] was another one on Fox News he did where
[06:39] he reiterated this absurd. Uh Max
[06:44] Blumenthal did a rather extraordinary
[06:46] piece here on this show right after
[06:49] having spent a few hours on the phone
[06:51] with sources whom he described as a
[06:55] person who was at the meeting with Aman
[06:58] and um um and Charlie and a person in
[07:03] the White House and Max is come to has
[07:08] come to the conclusion that Aman offered
[07:11] Aman's people offered Charlie a
[07:13] tremendous amount of money. It's been
[07:14] reported not by Max but by others to be
[07:17] upwards of $150 million
[07:20] uh if he would begin to say things
[07:22] favorable about Netanyahu and Charlie
[07:24] refused. That's when Aman and company
[07:27] invited him to Aman's home on Long
[07:30] Island
[07:32] and they began some sort of coercive
[07:35] pressure on him and he he refused that.
[07:39] >> Yeah. I mean, they viewed this as if he
[07:41] was an alcoholic or something. This was
[07:43] a Zionist intervention, you know, tow
[07:45] the line or else. And Bill Aman wrote
[07:48] indeed a long essay about this on
[07:50] Twitter about how he had nothing to do
[07:51] with it and all sorts of other stuff. It
[07:53] was, I think, about a thousand words.
[07:56] So, he's absolutely right about that.
[07:58] And he told friends in the weeks and
[08:00] days before he was murdered that he was
[08:02] afraid for his life. and he told friends
[08:06] and colleagues that he couldn't stand
[08:08] and didn't trust Netanyahu.
[08:11] Um, but here is Netanyahu
[08:14] saying what you just said. Now, there's
[08:16] a lot in here to unpack. It's not that
[08:18] long. It's only about a minute long, but
[08:21] he does say, you'll hear this. He and
[08:24] he, meaning Kirk, encouraged me to make
[08:27] the case directly to the American people
[08:30] about how vital Israel is to the US
[08:32] national security. Hold your fire.
[08:35] Here's Netanyahu yesterday.
[08:38] >> As if he had to recommend that to
[08:40] Netanyahu. By the way,
[08:42] >> Joseph Gerbles, the Nazi propaganda
[08:45] minister, said that the bigger the lie,
[08:48] the faster it will spread. Well,
[08:50] somebody has fabricated a monstrous big
[08:53] lie that Israel had something to do with
[08:56] Charlie Kirk's horrific murder. This is
[08:58] insane. It is false. It is outrageous.
[09:03] Charlie Kirk was a giant, a once- ina
[09:06] century talent who defended freedom,
[09:08] defended America, defended our common
[09:11] Judeo-Christian civilization. Charlie
[09:14] loved Israel. He loved the Jewish
[09:16] people. He told me so in a letter that
[09:18] he sent me just a few months ago. One of
[09:20] my greatest joys as a Christian, he
[09:22] said, is advocating for Israel and
[09:25] forming alliances with Jews to protect
[09:27] Judeo-Christian civilization.
[09:30] He encouraged me to make the case
[09:31] directly to the American people about
[09:33] how vital Israel is to US national
[09:37] security. He told me, "The Holy Land is
[09:40] so important to my life, it pains me to
[09:43] see support for Israel slip away." Now,
[09:46] if Charlie disagreed with a policy of
[09:47] mine or a decision here and there, not
[09:50] only did I not mind, I welcomed it. This
[09:53] is the essence of Charlie. This is the
[09:55] essence of a free country. It's exactly
[09:57] what Charlie stood for. And I knew that
[10:00] his suggestions always came from the
[10:02] heart, from his love for Israel and from
[10:04] his love for the Jewish people. A few
[10:07] weeks before his death, I spoke to
[10:09] Charlie. I invited him to visit Israel
[10:12] again. And sadly, that won't happen.
[10:16] Now, some are pedalling these disgusting
[10:18] rumors, perhaps out of obsession,
[10:22] perhaps with Qatari funding. What I do
[10:25] know is this. Charlie Kirk was a great
[10:28] man and a great man deserves honor, not
[10:31] lies. Rest in peace, Charlie Kirk.
[10:36] >> It's always Qatari funding, right?
[10:38] Carter and Russia has more influence in
[10:41] the US government if you trust the
[10:42] mainstream media and BB Netanyahu than
[10:45] if you actually look with your own two
[10:47] eyes and actually use reason and
[10:49] deductive logic. But there's a lot of
[10:51] things that he omitted there. It is true
[10:53] that he invited Charlie to go to Israel.
[10:55] He said unfortunately that won't happen.
[10:57] But what he's leaving out is apparently
[11:00] according to this article, this unnamed
[11:01] source that Max Blumenthal covered, it
[11:03] was because he turned the trip down, not
[11:06] because, you know, just timing called
[11:08] for it. Also, what's known from this
[11:11] piece is that this unnamed source close
[11:13] to Charlie Kirk, which corroborates a
[11:15] lot of the things that Candace Owens and
[11:16] Tucker Carlson are saying about him, is
[11:19] that he viewed Netanyahu as a bully. He
[11:21] didn't like him. He was manipulative and
[11:23] he hated the fact that Netanyahu was
[11:25] essentially dictating the president's
[11:27] personnel decisions in his cabinet. And
[11:30] that is true by the way. Surrounding
[11:32] yourself with people like Keith Kellogg
[11:34] and Marco Rubio and Mike Huckabe and for
[11:36] a while Mike Waltz and Cash Patel that
[11:39] the most hardcore Zionist imaginable in
[11:42] this administration. That is true. I
[11:45] mean say a lot what you can about
[11:46] Charlie Kirk. He was very pro-Israel
[11:48] generally speaking. And if you, you
[11:50] know, take some selected bits, it does
[11:52] raise eyebrows. There is something here.
[11:54] This is a story. But he wasn't Ben
[11:56] Shapiro on Israel. He wasn't Mark Levvin
[11:59] on Israel. He was kind of in between the
[12:01] Dave Smith and Ben Shapiro on Israel.
[12:07] Well,
[12:08] he references a letter that Kirk sent to
[12:11] him. Of course, he won't read the second
[12:12] part of the letter in which Kirk
[12:14] denounced what was happening in Gaza.
[12:16] With this sentence, he encouraged me to
[12:19] make the case directly to the American
[12:21] people about how vital Israel is to US
[12:24] national security.
[12:26] Israel isn't vital to the US national
[12:28] security. It's destructive of US
[12:30] national security. Is that not so?
[12:33] >> Well, it's more than destructive of
[12:35] American national security. It's
[12:37] reaching the point where it's
[12:39] destructive of American liberal
[12:41] democracy as well. But let's leave that
[12:44] aside for a second. The fact is that
[12:47] what was happening with Charlie Kirk,
[12:49] and it's very well documented, is that
[12:52] he was changing his mind in a
[12:55] fundamental way on Israel and Israel's
[12:59] role inside of the United States. Uh, a
[13:03] lot of people in recent years have begun
[13:07] to rethink how they view Israel and
[13:10] Israel's relationship with the United
[13:13] States. And what happened with Kirk is
[13:16] that he was at one point, as Prime
[13:18] Minister Netanyahu describes, super
[13:22] supportive of Israel, but he began to
[13:25] change his mind. And uh Max Blumenthal
[13:28] lays the story out again very clearly in
[13:30] his interview with you. And for anybody
[13:33] who hasn't seen that, they should watch
[13:35] it. And by the way, Tucker Carlson has
[13:37] put out uh a video where he talks about
[13:41] his lame discussions with Charlie Kirk
[13:45] that basically tell the same story that
[13:47] Max tells. So, it's quite clear that
[13:50] what was going on here is that Kirk had
[13:54] flipped on Israel and on Israel's
[13:57] relationship with the United States. So,
[14:00] >> so he did to some extent. He was
[14:02] frustrated about Israeli influence in
[14:04] the United States. But if you listen to
[14:06] some of those clips in isolation, you
[14:08] would think that he did totally turn.
[14:10] But I want to be clear here for
[14:12] clarification. Don't take my word for
[14:14] it. View that entire interview with
[14:16] Megan Kelly about a month ago. I think
[14:17] it was on Octo not October, August 6th
[14:20] on Megan Kelly show. They do, you know,
[14:24] offer a lot of Hasbro Zionist propaganda
[14:27] in that same show along with Kirk's
[14:30] frustrations with the push back he was
[14:32] getting from his donors and people
[14:33] calling him into question. They talk
[14:35] about how, you know, it's not a genocide
[14:37] and all this nonsense about how you
[14:39] can't trust the pictures coming out of
[14:41] Gaza because, you know, the Gazins are
[14:44] propagandists. Hamas would want nothing
[14:46] more to show that kids are starving and
[14:48] they want to do that. So, we shouldn't
[14:50] trust that kids are starving. Both of
[14:52] them align on certain things, but truly
[14:54] Charlie did wrestle with this issue to
[14:57] some extent. That's very true. And
[14:59] again, in Max's piece, he says, you
[15:01] know, he was frightened by the backlash
[15:03] he was starting to get from some of his
[15:05] donors. He had Tucker Carlson come to a
[15:08] recent event of his and speak. And
[15:10] famously, Tucker Carlson not only
[15:12] strongly suggested that it was probably
[15:15] Israel that Jeffrey Epstein was working
[15:18] for, he not even strongly suggest he
[15:20] said that. And he also said it's not
[15:22] anti-semitic to criticize Israel and you
[15:24] should criticize Israel if there is a
[15:26] critique toward Israel given that the US
[15:28] is bankrolling that country. And both of
[15:31] those things are not what Zionist
[15:33] donors, especially rich ones, want to
[15:34] hear. Also, he had Dave Smith debate
[15:36] Josh Hammer at that event. And Dave
[15:38] Smith got more of a positive reception
[15:41] than Zionist Josh Hammer at a young
[15:43] conservative event. Really tells you
[15:45] where the barometer of young
[15:46] conservatives is shifting when it comes
[15:48] to Israel. in a very important way. Uh
[15:52] what's going on here is that Netanyahu
[15:54] is not telling the truth.
[15:57] >> What else is new though?
[15:59] >> Yeah, that's right. But the problem is I
[16:01] mean there are two problems here. First
[16:03] of all, everybody, not everybody, but
[16:05] almost everybody believes uh that
[16:08] Netanyahu lies all the time. Uh that's
[16:11] true in Israel as well as in the United
[16:14] States. So when he says he's telling the
[16:17] truth and others are lying, it's not an
[16:19] argument that's going to sell very well.
[16:21] >> Yeah. It's funny when he cites Gerbles
[16:23] about the power of lies and big lies
[16:26] being easier to spread. Well, he's the
[16:28] mass purveyor of lies when it comes to
[16:31] foreign policy, the US-Israeli
[16:33] relationship, even using propaganda in
[16:36] that speech to say, you know, the
[16:37] Judeo-Christian tradition as if that's
[16:40] something that we're just innately bound
[16:42] into. Well, he uses that language on
[16:44] purpose to suggest that it's just
[16:47] obligatory for the two powers to be
[16:49] aligned in everything, no matter what.
[16:51] No matter how many wars Israel drags us
[16:53] into, no matter, you know, killing 34
[16:56] sailors in 1967 on the US liberty, you
[16:59] know, stealing nuclear weapons, you
[17:02] know, drawing the US into a war versus
[17:04] Iran, bombing Carter, ostensively a US
[17:07] ally, and then just the US looking the
[17:09] other way. All of this nonsense. The
[17:12] other problem that he faces and the
[17:14] Israelis face more generally is they run
[17:16] around the world assassinating people on
[17:19] a daily basis. It's really quite
[17:21] stunning. So when someone like Charlie
[17:24] Kirk gets assassinated or someone like
[17:26] JFK gets assassinated,
[17:29] it doesn't take much for people with
[17:31] creative minds to link Israel to those
[17:34] assassinations. Now, I'm not saying for
[17:36] one second that that's true, but in a
[17:39] world like the one that we live in where
[17:42] it's very hard to tell what the truth is
[17:45] and most people think the government,
[17:47] and here we're talking about the
[17:48] American government, lies to us, it's
[17:52] very easy for conspiracy theories to
[17:54] fester. And again, as I said, uh when
[17:57] you think about assassinations, the
[17:59] first country that comes to mind uh is
[18:02] Israel. And uh that's the problem that
[18:05] Netanyahu faces here.
[18:07] >> There is there's obvious reasons for
[18:09] that. We delve into delved into the list
[18:12] of assassinations Israel has done, but
[18:14] that's the reputation they've gained,
[18:17] such as why Netanyahu felt forced to
[18:20] respond to that not only once right
[18:22] after it happened, but twice and again
[18:24] today. So that's where we're at here.
[18:27] Here's uh Charlie Kirk 24 hours
[18:31] after the meeting with Bill Aman with my
[18:35] friend and former colleague uh Megan
[18:37] Kelly. Chris, cut number 12.
[18:38] >> Megan, you're hitting on something very
[18:40] potent and important. The people that
[18:42] are attacking me are in a hyper paranoid
[18:44] state because they're at war and war
[18:47] tends to make things black and white and
[18:50] you're a hammer looking for a nail. I
[18:52] have less ability sometimes online to
[18:56] criticize the Israeli government without
[18:57] backlash than actual Israelis do.
[19:00] Personality types like you, myself, and
[19:02] Tucker. The more that you guys privately
[19:05] and publicly call our character into
[19:08] question when the hostile reaction is
[19:12] that now Megan and Charlie are enemies,
[19:16] >> right? Boy, I'll tell you like you're
[19:18] you're you're you're you're going to
[19:20] you're not going to I won't say lose,
[19:21] but you will weaken and just basically
[19:24] deflate two of your strongest advocates
[19:27] if that continues.
[19:29] >> Is obviously talking about the people he
[19:31] had spent the the day before with at Mr.
[19:34] Aman's home uh in Long Island uh New
[19:38] York.
[19:39] >> Indeed, man, that interview, you can
[19:41] tell his frustrations just leaping out
[19:43] of the screen. And that's the way I've
[19:44] described it in several other videos and
[19:46] we've discussed this in other videos and
[19:48] I've talked about it at length. You
[19:50] know, in isolation, man, that looks
[19:53] rough. That looks to confirm everything
[19:55] out of Max's article, what Tucker
[19:57] Carlson's saying, what Candace Owens
[19:59] saying, what Harrison Smith's source
[20:01] says. Harrison Smith talked to another
[20:03] unnamed friend of Charlie Kirk who said
[20:06] that Charlie Kirk was afraid that Israel
[20:08] would kill him. He posted this back in
[20:10] August, by the way, before Kirk was
[20:13] shot. So, a lot of things are aligning
[20:15] to at least raise eyebrows. And whether
[20:17] or not you think Israel has culpability
[20:19] here, it seems like Kirk was shifting in
[20:22] some ways on Israel. Now, again, I don't
[20:24] think that's on always. You know, in
[20:26] some of the other clips, I think are
[20:27] total nothing burgers. And a lot of
[20:29] Charlie's position might be explained by
[20:31] things other than his own, you know,
[20:34] pensions, his own proclivities toward
[20:36] Israel. And the reason I say that is
[20:38] he's he was uniquely positioned in the
[20:40] conservative movement. He wasn't like
[20:42] Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens in a
[20:44] way. He kind of had to thread the needle
[20:46] between two different distinct forces
[20:49] within his organization. Number one, the
[20:51] wealthy Zionist donors, the Bill Amans
[20:54] and the Seth Dillons in the world that
[20:56] only want you to tow the line on Israel.
[20:58] They want you to be Ben Shapiro. They
[21:00] need you to be Ben Shapiro. And that's
[21:02] it. No deviations. And then you had
[21:05] Charlie working with this young activist
[21:07] base on college campuses. And we know
[21:09] that young people, even conservative
[21:11] young people, are not nearly even close
[21:14] as pro-Israel as their parents, as their
[21:17] boomer Fox News watching parents. And
[21:19] that's a generality. I know that there
[21:21] are boomers that despise the US-Israeli
[21:24] relationship, but they're fewer and far
[21:25] between. That's just a fact. And every
[21:27] poll confirms that. So, he was kind of
[21:29] in a rock and a hard place. And you
[21:31] know, part of his opinions, especially
[21:33] when it comes to lately and the number
[21:35] of corpses pile up in Gaza over this
[21:38] genocide that the US funds, you'd know
[21:40] that his ideas are shifting based upon
[21:43] some of the things he said. And again,
[21:45] another, you know, reference point on
[21:47] July 29th, he posted a really hardcore
[21:49] Zionist propaganda video where he denied
[21:52] that any starvation was happening in
[21:54] Gaza as a deliberate campaign by the
[21:58] government. He said, "There's not
[21:59] starvation. And this is just Hamas
[22:01] propaganda. He recorded a long video to
[22:04] that extent on X. You can still see that
[22:05] on his timeline today. So he was still
[22:08] doubling down on some of the propaganda,
[22:11] but behind the scenes and in terms of
[22:12] the frustrations he was feeling toward
[22:14] the end, there did seem to be some
[22:16] shifting. So that's where we're at. And
[22:18] it's only natural that people will point
[22:20] fingers at Israel. I have no reason to
[22:23] have a narrative, you know, have a
[22:25] thread, a through line that proves
[22:27] Israeli involvement whatsoever. But this
[22:30] is a story regardless of how you feel. I
[22:32] keep saying that because I don't
[22:34] necessarily think that all the the
[22:37] theories are great without some linkage.
[22:39] We need some linkage. Like the fact
[22:41] that, you know, the FBI wiretapped
[22:43] Martin Luther King, he tried they tried
[22:45] to convince him to commit suicide and
[22:47] that's why his family believed the FBI
[22:49] was involved. I think we need something
[22:52] solid to go, but this is enough to be a
[22:54] story to raise eyebrows to talk about. I
[22:56] wouldn't shut down conversation in that
[22:58] direction whatsoever. Glad to hear Mir
[23:01] Shimer weighs weigh in on this. We
[23:02] largely agree on our perceptions here. I
[23:05] think he buys into that that Charlie
[23:06] shifted a little bit more than I do. But
[23:08] what do you guys think? Let me know in
[23:10] the comments below. Please let me know.
[23:12] Did Israel have any involvement in his
[23:14] murder? Is it just natural based on the
[23:16] course of history that people would have
[23:18] suspicions about Israel? And what does
[23:20] this mean for USIsraeli relations going
[23:22] forward? Will this turn more people away
[23:24] from Israel if more people learn about
[23:26] this? Let me know in the comments.
[23:28] Please like the video, subscribe to the
[23:29] channel, also subscribe to Judge
[23:31] Npalitano. Thank you for this interview,
[23:33] Judge. It was awesome. And it would mean
[23:35] the world to me if you decided to join
[23:37] as a member on Liberty Vault. If you
[23:39] click the join button below, you can
[23:41] help support this channel. And in
[23:42] return, I'll give you all my videos
[23:45] before they go live to the general
[23:46] public on YouTube. you'll essentially
[23:48] have advanced viewing of them. And until
[23:50] I see you guys next time, no more war,
[23:52] no more debt, no more inflation, and no
[23:54] more empire. Peace out, guys. Catch you
[23:56] in the next one.
