Kirk Assassination: NEW Video Evidence Changes Everything!

[00:01] Let me start here because this one

[00:03] stopped me in my tracks, man. President

[00:05] Trump was just asked about pardoning

[00:07] Galain Maxwell's Jeffrey Rev's partner

[00:10] in crime. And instead of saying

[00:12] absolutely not, he says, "Well, I got to

[00:14] talk to the DOJ man." Let's play it.

[00:17] Let's see it.

[00:19] >> Say it.

[00:19] >> The Supreme Court is back and they

[00:21] rejected today an appeal by Glen Maxwell

[00:24] to overturn her conviction. That means

[00:26] her only chance of getting out of prison

[00:28] is a pardon from you. Is that something

[00:30] you're

[00:30] >> Who are we talking about?

[00:31] >> Bill Maxwell.

[00:33] >> Uh, you know, I haven't heard the name

[00:35] in so long. I can say this that I'd have

[00:38] to take a look at it. I would have to

[00:40] take a look. Did they reject that?

[00:42] >> She wanted to appeal her conviction.

[00:44] They said that they were not going to

[00:45] hear her appeal.

[00:46] >> I see. Well, I'll take a look at it.

[00:47] I'll speak to I will speak to the DOJ. I

[00:50] wouldn't consider it or not consider. I

[00:52] don't know anything about it. So, but

[00:53] I'll speak I will speak to the DO DOJ.

[00:57] >> Sir,

[00:57] >> I don't know. I mean, I'd have to speak

[00:59] to the DOJ. I'll look at it.

[01:00] >> That means it's not off the table.

[01:03] >> I'll I have a lot of people who have

[01:05] asked me for pardons. Uh uh I call him

[01:08] Puff Daddy has asked me for a pardon.

[01:10] >> But she was convicted of child sex

[01:11] trafficking.

[01:12] >> Yeah. I mean, I'm going to have to take

[01:14] a look at it. I have to ask DOJ. I

[01:16] didn't know they rejected it. I didn't

[01:18] know she was even in

[01:21] >> Stop right there, man. That shouldn't

[01:23] even be a question. Why would the idea

[01:26] of pardoning a convicted child

[01:28] trafficker accomplice even be a freaking

[01:31] discussion? This is exactly how the deep

[01:34] state survives, man. Minimum security

[01:35] prison deals, quiet transfers, good

[01:38] behavior perks. The system protects us

[01:41] while the public gets crumbs. And the

[01:43] thing is is that recently Trump was

[01:45] asked about

[01:49] things going on in Ukraine and the he he

[01:53] pretended he didn't know about it and

[01:56] the journalist asked him the question

[01:58] said well does normally things happen

[02:01] behind your back with it under your

[02:02] command and he said no I know about

[02:04] everything that's happening so that

[02:05] means that he knows about this but he's

[02:08] kind of deflecting the question okay and

[02:10] we can look at a historical parallel

[02:12] here we look at Nixon's silent pardons

[02:15] we've seen this movie Four, man. Back

[02:17] into the 1970s, Nixon's Watergate

[02:20] cronies didn't vanish vanish into

[02:22] obscurity. They got wrist slaps,

[02:26] commutations, and sweetheart deals. The

[02:29] elite protected their own just like they

[02:30] did with Jeffrey Epstein back in the day

[02:32] because when one domino falls, the whole

[02:34] structure risk collapse.

[02:37] Then it was office breakins. Now it's

[02:39] trafficking rings. But the pattern is

[02:41] the same. And the bigger the crime, the

[02:44] softer the punishment. If if you're in

[02:47] the club, you and I are not part of that

[02:50] club and we get

[02:53] gas lit. B is boring. It's a hoax.

[02:59] Now, speaking of the system pertaining

[03:02] to self and why you're here, new higher

[03:04] resolution footage has surfaced of the

[03:07] Charlie Kirk incident. Man, the

[03:08] assassination. I reviewed the new uh

[03:12] angles, and it shows

[03:15] very well the shirt ballooning out,

[03:19] fabric inflating, and even his necklace

[03:22] dislodging.

[03:24] Now, I'm going to break this down for

[03:26] you. Analyze it because the physics

[03:29] matter. You're talking a high velocity

[03:32] round, whether 556 762 or 306, whatever

[03:35] you want.

[03:37] It produces a localized penetration

[03:40] channel. It tears a tiny hole, right? If

[03:44] he was shot in the the shirt, you may

[03:46] see the shirt ripped, but he was

[03:47] obviously shot in the neck, so there was

[03:49] not that. But you would just see a

[03:52] and then the outward balloon-like

[03:55] expansion across the torso. That's not

[03:57] how ballistic trauma works. Okay.

[04:01] a full power high velocity cartridge.

[04:04] You know, using this type of rifle,

[04:07] you're looking at a typical load of 196

[04:09] to 200 grain bullet at 2500 to 2,700

[04:12] feet per second at muzzle. At 200 yards

[04:15] of velocity of steel, maybe 2,300 to

[04:17] 2400 feet per second of energy. So, 2300

[04:21] to 2500 foot-lb. In other words, it's

[04:24] basically being a 306 class is designed

[04:27] to punch through heavy materials, bones,

[04:31] everything. Right now,

[04:35] what I'm going to show you here

[04:38] is you can see the balloon effect within

[04:43] his shirt. Now, the other day, if you

[04:44] weren't watching, if you hadn't watched

[04:46] my channel, uh I would encourage you to

[04:48] go back to the videos because I showed

[04:49] the frontal. Now, I'm not showing any

[04:52] actual video here because I got nailed

[04:54] the other day for this because if I was

[04:56] a lefty showing this, it'd be fine. But

[04:57] because I speak truth, you know, I have

[05:00] no masters, by the way. None. We'll

[05:02] we'll get into that, too. But what

[05:05] you're seeing is a textbook signature of

[05:07] an outward pressure event. In plain

[05:10] language, gas displacement from

[05:12] underneath the shirt,

[05:14] right?

[05:16] It's being pressurized.

[05:18] That's the calling card of a pyrochnic

[05:20] squib CO2 burst or micro detonation

[05:23] device concealed under clothing. Now

[05:28] the you know the secondary motion and

[05:31] I'm going to get in this. So if you want

[05:32] to see the real video, this is what I'm

[05:34] going to do. I'm going to post it on my

[05:35] Instagram story. Go follow me on

[05:36] Instagram. I'm going to put on the story

[05:38] because I did not want to post this

[05:39] video. I hadn't posted any of the the

[05:41] video because just out of respect, man.

[05:43] Um one to to Charlie Kirk, his family.

[05:46] Uh, and then my viewers who don't want

[05:48] to see this type of thing, but I'm going

[05:50] to post on the story. You don't see any

[05:51] gore or anything. You're just going to

[05:52] see the reaction of the shirt, but I'm

[05:54] going to post it on the story because I

[05:55] can't post it here. Um, and hopefully

[05:57] you can respect that. But

[06:00] in the in the video, you're going to see

[06:02] his necklace ejecting. I can't show that

[06:04] part here, but in this image here is

[06:05] where his necklace is ejecting. Now, a

[06:07] lot of people were saying the other day

[06:09] to me in the the first video, "Oh,

[06:10] that's his necklace like ringing around

[06:12] his shirt." It's not true. The necklace

[06:13] had already ejected by that time. Okay.

[06:16] Right. This would and the necklace

[06:18] ejecting would be consistent with a

[06:20] kinetic uh kinetic

[06:24] I'm sorry a like a blast wave, not a

[06:27] kinetic bullet strike. Rifle fire does

[06:29] not knock jewelry off sideways. Okay.

[06:31] But micro explosives will.

[06:34] A bullet doesn't create create a

[06:37] directional puff that moves hair like

[06:40] this. Look at this. The first shot is

[06:44] right before with his hair down. The

[06:46] second shot, his hair up. Okay, that

[06:49] puff coming from his shirt making his

[06:52] hair go up. Nobody caught this. This is

[06:54] This is the I'm the first person that

[06:56] I've seen that talked about the hair

[06:58] puffing on the back of his neck.

[07:01] Now, that would only happen if the round

[07:03] grazed the scalp passing extremely close

[07:06] in open air, not necessarily touching

[07:08] the individual. In other words, what

[07:10] you're watching is a volutric gas

[07:12] expansion, not a a tensil tear, uh maybe

[07:16] a controlled explosive displacement, not

[07:18] ballistic penetration, right? And again,

[07:21] I can't even show the raw sequence here

[07:22] because YouTube will nuke the damn

[07:24] video. The full uncut footage will be

[07:25] posted on my Instagram story. Go see it

[07:27] for yourself and tell me what you think.

[07:28] And again, if you don't want to see it,

[07:30] um don't watch my Instagram stories for

[07:33] the next uh 24 hours, okay? Um, don't

[07:37] click my stories for the next day or so.

[07:40] Now,

[07:42] they're claiming this was a 30 six,

[07:45] right? Mouser from 200 yards. Do you

[07:49] know how much energy it still carries at

[07:51] at that range over 200 2,000

[07:55] foot-pounds,

[07:56] right? You don't just stop that in the

[07:58] neck without an exit. Could it be

[08:01] fragmented on the vertebrae? In theory,

[08:03] yes. But you'd expect a catastrophic

[08:05] blowout,

[08:07] not just a frontal neck spray and no

[08:09] exit. To me, it looks like the shirt

[08:12] inflation, the the gas pressure release

[08:15] coincides with the hair lift suggests

[08:18] more so an outward force from beneath

[08:21] the clothing rather than a inbound rifle

[08:23] strike. What this footage shows is the

[08:25] the shirt inflation front to front and

[08:30] then back. And you can kind of see this.

[08:32] I think I have a a clip here. I think I

[08:35] have an image here.

[08:37] I don't I don't Maybe I don't have it. I

[08:40] thought I had it, but maybe I do. No, I

[08:43] don't have it. But you can see it kind

[08:45] of starting in the front. Okay. You can

[08:47] see it kind of starting in the front.

[08:49] Then the necklace will eject.

[08:52] Then hair movement. So, it's kind of a

[08:53] ripple effect in this direction is what

[08:56] you'll see in slow motion. The footage

[08:57] is slowed down. it still looks like a

[08:59] blast event, not a textbook rifle

[09:01] impact. And so really the physics of it

[09:04] just does not add up. Now if we also

[09:08] look at another historical parallel,

[09:10] look at France Ferdinand, the propaganda

[09:12] setup and history rhymes again. When

[09:16] Archduke France Ferdinand was

[09:18] assassinated in 1914, actual event was

[09:20] messy, man. Multiple attackers,

[09:23] grenades, gunfire, confusion.

[09:27] But the propaganda machine cleaned it

[09:29] all up in a neat little story to spark

[09:30] World War I. Now you have to ask your

[09:33] event, right? Ask about this event right

[09:35] now why this happened because the

[09:37] details didn't matter then. What

[09:39] mattered was the narrative. And just

[09:41] like back then, what we're seeing now is

[09:43] the raw footage telling one story while

[09:45] the official narrative demands we

[09:47] believe another.

[09:49] And it's happening constantly.

[09:53] what what we have here

[09:55] something I've noticed officer Tatum has

[09:58] taken it upon himself to become the

[10:01] spokesperson for Israel. Um you know I I

[10:05] still follow him but I used to like the

[10:08] guy but daily he does this and he

[10:09] brought this lady here Sarah Adams on

[10:11] here now. Um I don't know her. I don't

[10:13] really know anybody that knows her.

[10:15] People that people that worked in the

[10:16] same place don't know her. So anyway,

[10:20] the thing is is that I'm I'm going to

[10:21] tell you right now

[10:24] just for just for GP

[10:28] is that anyone who screams a specific

[10:31] message constantly,

[10:33] there's probably a reason for it, and

[10:35] you're going to see that later on in

[10:36] this video. I have some real evidence

[10:38] here in a moment. But when someone

[10:40] constantly speaks the same message,

[10:42] saying this one enemy, this one enemy,

[10:44] I'm not saying these people aren't the

[10:45] enemy, but this she keeps saying the

[10:48] same group of people's enemy, they're

[10:49] the only enemy. Well, who's that people

[10:50] the enemy to? Well, the same people

[10:52] Officer Tatum uh tends to stand up for

[10:56] on a daily basis, take it upon himself

[10:57] to be the spokesperson for them. You

[11:00] know, even so much so they've pretty

[11:03] much got it. He he posted this. He said,

[11:04] "I truly admire this young man. This is

[11:06] the new guy that's supposedly taking

[11:08] over for Charlie Kirk. This guy is about

[11:10] as soft as as frozen yogurt. Man, he

[11:14] he's got more sugar in his shoes than

[11:16] most of you got in his pantry in in your

[11:18] pantry. Um, but you know, he's saying

[11:22] he's extremely proud of this guy. Well,

[11:23] that guy is also a mouthpiece for a

[11:25] certain uh uh the the uh greatest ally.

[11:31] You have to ask yourself why would

[11:32] someone keep saying this certain

[11:33] narrative and and and the fact is is

[11:35] when they change completely to this one

[11:37] narrative. Okay. Now

[11:40] and you know just just so you know I'm

[11:43] not bought and paid for by anybody. Um I

[11:46] don't take money from anybody. And uh I

[11:49] think it's pretty apparent because man I

[11:51] I kind of change course all the time

[11:53] dude. Like you know I keep one thing

[11:56] freedom. freedom and the constitution

[11:59] and and and obviously Christ Jesus

[12:02] Christ is is the Lord. That's my main

[12:04] thing, right? Jesus Christ is Lord, the

[12:07] Constitution and freedom. Okay? All the

[12:09] that's it. I'll deviate from the people

[12:12] that I I would I have supported before

[12:15] if they go against the grain, man. Um

[12:17] the other thing is is I'm supported by

[12:19] you uh by my company, Black Scout

[12:22] Survival. you you uh buy my products,

[12:24] which I try to make the absolute

[12:26] freaking best to support you. And uh

[12:29] that's the thing. You support me. That's

[12:30] what supports this operation. And I also

[12:32] work for a living. I work for a living,

[12:34] guys. Um so anyway,

[12:37] I'm a real working man,

[12:39] but I won't take a hand out, man.

[12:42] Ukraine uh uh media try to get a hold of

[12:44] me with government. It's the government

[12:46] media. I did a video about this the

[12:47] other They're trying to get a hold of

[12:48] me, trying to offer me to to speak in

[12:50] favor of them. And I said, "No, no."

[12:53] I've said no to a lot of people. I've

[12:55] had all kinds of people come out of war

[12:56] work trying to get get a hold of me,

[12:57] man. I won't sign a contract. I'm not

[12:59] getting any deals. None of that. I'm not

[13:01] playing those games, right? And kind of

[13:03] speaking along those lines that we got,

[13:06] you know, if none of that was enough,

[13:07] what we've seen so far is Candace Owens

[13:09] has released alleged text messages or

[13:11] group chat from Carly Kirk, sorry,

[13:14] Charlie Kirk just 48 hours before his

[13:16] death. Now, in this text, he says he

[13:18] lost a major donor about $2 million a

[13:20] year because he wouldn't cancel Tucker

[13:22] Carlson. Now, I can't speak to these

[13:25] texts or group chats, but she posted

[13:28] them, so we'll talk about them right

[13:31] now. Now, in here, he specifically

[13:32] refers to Jewish donors and says they're

[13:34] pressuring him that he won't be bullied

[13:37] and that he that it's leaving him no

[13:39] choice but to lead the pro-Israel cause.

[13:41] Right?

[13:43] So, that came out and then you can go

[13:46] along lines and around that same time

[13:48] frame as this came out, it said that

[13:50] Robert J. Schielman, a conservative tech

[13:52] billionaire who two associates described

[13:55] as a father figure to Mr. Kirk, two days

[13:57] before M. Kirk's death, Mr. Schman

[13:59] angrily questioned Mr. Kirk for giving

[14:01] uh a platform to Mr. Carlson and

[14:03] informed him he was withdrawing his $2

[14:05] million pledge to Turning Point. Okay.

[14:07] So

[14:10] that kind of happened. Okay.

[14:13] Now Mr. Schulman made no mention of any

[14:16] discord between them but said Turning

[14:18] Point USA without a leader it has has

[14:21] nowhere to go. So, you know, they

[14:22] appointed a leader within a few days.

[14:25] And

[14:27] this is not going to be a a popular

[14:29] thing, but hey, I'm just going by what

[14:30] Charlie Kirk said.

[14:33] I was not a Charlie Kirk follower

[14:35] before, but I've consumed a lot of his

[14:36] content lately. And one thing he spoke

[14:38] about quite often and what I saw, I was

[14:40] actually going to post a clip of it, but

[14:41] you can go type it in Boss Babes. He

[14:44] talks quite seriously about women being

[14:48] home and taking care of children. And

[14:49] you have to ask yourself who's going to

[14:51] be taking care of the children now that

[14:52] the wife is now the CEO, you know, and

[14:54] maybe he did have that in his uh plans,

[14:57] his arrangement something happened to

[14:58] him. I can't say. I haven't seen that.

[15:00] But the fact of the matter is it kind of

[15:02] goes along with his ideology that he

[15:03] spoke about all these years. Um you

[15:06] know, if I look at a man that says one

[15:08] message and then another happens after

[15:10] his death, I have to ask, well, why was

[15:11] he saying this all this time? Was is

[15:13] this rules for thee or not for me or

[15:14] does someone change his message? I don't

[15:17] know.

[15:18] But you do have to ask yourself that um

[15:21] you know why he he he was opposed to

[15:25] women in that capacity. He said you know

[15:27] he believed in traditional women uh

[15:29] gender roles uh you know and so who's

[15:31] going to be taking care of the children

[15:32] now that the the especially the father's

[15:35] gone out of the home. Um you know you

[15:38] just have to ask yourself. Now I'm not

[15:42] here to talk bad about anyone especially

[15:44] not Charlie Kirk because he's gone. He

[15:46] was a patriot. But I do step back and

[15:49] think about what this text message

[15:51] implies. Man, these texts are real. The

[15:54] screw chat's real. It's an emission

[15:55] that's that support for calls can be

[15:58] bought and withdrawn like a stock

[16:00] position.

[16:02] And that is an activism activism. That's

[16:04] a shield arrangement, man. I'm only

[16:07] promoting this of who's funding me. And

[16:09] that's exactly why it's hard to trust

[16:11] people in this business because money

[16:12] warps loyalty, man. Money buys silence.

[16:14] And when the funding dries up, the

[16:16] principles dry up, too. You know, I'm

[16:19] just saying what it is, man. That I

[16:21] don't like the way that text that text

[16:22] is not favor. It's not favorable. It it

[16:25] says that I my loyalty can be bought

[16:27] essentially. Um, obviously it it

[16:30] couldn't be because he went against him

[16:31] and still was going to say Tucker

[16:33] Carlson, but was going to be there. So,

[16:36] I do commend Charlie for standing up for

[16:38] his beliefs and and his opinions. And he

[16:40] even said, "I would may bring Candace

[16:41] on." So, you have to give the man that

[16:43] he was willing to lose $2 million to to

[16:46] stand up for that. Right now,

[16:50] being that he did that before the loss,

[16:53] that speaks volumes of him as a man.

[16:56] Now, if it came after loss, I would say

[16:58] uh kind of like what I said before that

[17:01] loyalty can be bought and paid for. It

[17:03] doesn't look like that he's that way to

[17:04] me. It looked like that he is willing to

[17:06] stand on principles, stand on business

[17:09] and lose money and not care. And matter

[17:12] of fact, I'll keep doing whatever I'm

[17:14] doing. That's what I got from it, you

[17:16] know, and I can definitely respect that.

[17:18] So he he seemed to be a man that

[17:21] truthfully lived with his on his values

[17:25] and uh yeah

[17:28] but you know we got this came out with

[17:31] Anna Palina Luna.

[17:34] She's out here saying that the

[17:35] assassination may be tied to foreign

[17:37] government funding. Well I was saying

[17:39] that other day too but she says a

[17:41] different one. She says pointing the

[17:43] finger at China rather than our greatest

[17:46] ally.

[17:47] Check it out.

[17:49] >> There's been a lot of um questions as to

[17:52] whether there was foreign government

[17:53] involvement

[17:54] >> in which one

[17:55] >> in the assassination of Charlie Kirk,

[17:56] right? So like we're going to address

[17:57] these theories right now.

[17:59] >> Um back during the ICE rights, do you

[18:02] remember all of that at the beginning of

[18:03] the year?

[18:04] >> A lot of people were like, where are all

[18:06] of a sudden these big violent riots

[18:08] coming from? Who's funding these

[18:09] organizations? Well, this is something

[18:11] we've always talked about, guys, is that

[18:14] NOS's and how this works is, you know,

[18:17] the CIA,

[18:19] our our own government does this same

[18:21] sort of thing. They'll go fund these

[18:24] groups in the countries to try to

[18:25] overthrow the country. So, why would you

[18:28] think that it wouldn't happen here?

[18:32] We found out that there was a foreign

[18:33] funding tie to an individual by the name

[18:35] of Neville Singham who's a

[18:36] multi-billionaire and he made his

[18:39] billions by working with the communist

[18:41] Chinese government and he would take and

[18:43] he's not a registered agent a foreign

[18:45] agent which is a far violation. So he's

[18:47] taking these millions funneling it into

[18:49] organizations like the party of

[18:50] socialism and liberation who then in

[18:52] turn create these very radicalized

[18:54] movements but they're not even American

[18:56] and

[18:56] >> George Soros or any of the these other

[18:58] clowns. Same same playbook

[19:00] >> are funded by American people. They're

[19:02] actually formed uh funded.

[19:04] >> She's wrong there. She's wrong there

[19:07] because a lot of USA goes to groups like

[19:09] these and we we wind up funding our own

[19:11] demise. So she's wrong there

[19:13] >> by foreign governments. The irony in all

[19:16] this is that Neville Singham, not just

[19:18] to Mandani's election, so like Jews from

[19:21] Mandani, but he actually also has ties

[19:24] to funding the party of socialism, um

[19:26] the Salt Lake City queer group, which is

[19:27] now being investigation, investigated

[19:29] with uh former knowledge on whether or

[19:31] not they knew Charlie would be

[19:32] assassinated, who had ties to the

[19:34] shooter.

[19:35] >> So, I talked about this other week, man.

[19:37] And that group is actually not a

[19:38] Chinesebacked group. that group group is

[19:41] she's saying it's funded by beijing is

[19:43] what she's getting to that group is

[19:44] actually what I found was funded by Iran

[19:47] and we know that everything that happens

[19:49] from Iran actually don't come from Iran.

[19:54] >> So I do think that there's a foreign

[19:55] funding tie but the question is which

[19:57] government and I think it's tied to the

[19:58] Chinese.

[19:59] >> So she said the Chinese. Nah, I don't

[20:03] buy that for one second man. You know,

[20:06] you can you can judge the clip for

[20:08] yourself, but this is the kind of noise

[20:10] that fills the vacuum when no one trusts

[20:12] the official story. And and China's the

[20:14] boogeyman. Every group blames his

[20:16] favorite enemy. Every every everyone

[20:19] points his finger at foreign actors.

[20:20] Meanwhile, the actual truth gets buried.

[20:23] And USA funds most most of it. You know,

[20:26] we we've seen that. They've tried to

[20:28] cover that up. But but this is why I

[20:30] keep hammering the point, man. when

[20:31] everything from donors to government

[20:32] investigations to video ev evidence

[20:35] evidence looks choreographed. You aren't

[20:37] living inside a narrative war, man.

[20:39] You're not in a news cycle, right?

[20:41] You're I'm sorry. You're living in a

[20:43] narrative war, not you're not a news

[20:45] cycle. But the other thing is you're

[20:46] living in the freaking matrix. Okay? And

[20:49] and and and the bottom line is if you

[20:52] you even look at this, like I saw this

[20:53] guy's post the other day for these

[20:54] aerial photographs. Three days after

[20:56] Charlie Kirk's assassination, they

[20:57] literally bricked over the exact

[20:58] location of the crime scene.

[21:01] I mean, that's just totally normal,

[21:04] right? Is Is that not crazy? Is this not

[21:07] crazy? Look at this.

[21:10] I mean, 3 days after 3 days after

[21:14] doesn't make sense.

[21:16] The other thing is I started looking for

[21:18] today where Charlie Kirk was buried. And

[21:20] maybe they're keeping that a secret.

[21:22] It's It's quite possible, but there's a

[21:24] lot of people calling to find out where,

[21:26] right? Sorry.

[21:29] Phoenix church field calls from people

[21:31] who mistakenly believe Kirk will be

[21:32] buried there. So, this church is saying

[21:34] that they're getting calls because

[21:36] somehow it was alleged that he was

[21:37] getting buried there. And so, people

[21:39] wanting to bring flowers or wanting to

[21:40] send donations to the church and so on.

[21:44] But they said, "No, it's not us." And

[21:46] then that the only church that I I saw

[21:48] that had any kind of official kind of

[21:51] news is this uh Hansen Mortuary. Well,

[21:54] it's a mortary. It's not even a church.

[21:56] Hansen Mortuary in Phoenix.

[21:59] And they don't have the grave site as of

[22:01] now that I I've saw, but they set up a

[22:05] memorial so you could go put flowers and

[22:07] stuff by a Charlie Kirk sign. So

[22:12] very strange, right? All of a strange

[22:16] and the thing is is that when you look

[22:17] at all this stuff, man, it kind of all

[22:20] corresponds together, man. You got you

[22:22] got Trump hedging on Maxwell.

[22:25] And you have to ask yourself why.

[22:29] Well, went did that interview. Trump had

[22:30] nothing to do with it. And I'm not

[22:32] saying Trump did, but it's just odd

[22:34] timing, man. Right. Then we had the

[22:36] strange physics of the Kirk footage,

[22:40] the donor text, and now the China

[22:41] narrative. Each piece of on on it on is

[22:45] weird. But if you put them all together,

[22:47] man, you see the pattern. A system that

[22:48] protects insiders, punishes outsiders,

[22:51] and keeps you guessing with halftruths.

[22:55] Again, guys, if you want to see the raw

[22:56] footage, I'm going to go put on my

[22:58] Instagram right now on the stories.

[23:00] Watch it and tell me if it's a bullet or

[23:03] a blast. I'm not saying this either. I

[23:04] don't know. I don't know. I'm just a guy

[23:07] who's trying to on the search for truth.

[23:09] And

[23:12] regardless of what happened, the story

[23:15] doesn't add up. The narrative was cut

[23:17] too quickly. Too quickly. The they're

[23:22] saying that there's a high chance, high

[23:25] likelihood that Tyler Robinson will get

[23:28] get away with this based on just

[23:30] evidence.

[23:32] already the case is in the the the

[23:35] beginning stages and they're already

[23:36] talking about him getting away. The

[23:38] prosecution said they don't have enough

[23:41] they don't have any photos with with him

[23:43] with a rifle. They have no clean photos

[23:46] that is him

[23:48] locations

[23:50] the the the the text between him and the

[23:53] boyfriend have no date stamp. So

[23:56] obviously it was just typed up

[23:57] somewhere.

[24:00] None of it makes sense. And so when

[24:01] nothing make sense, you wind up asking

[24:05] questions.

[24:08] All I know is that this does not look

[24:10] like your typical blast uh rifle blast

[24:14] rifle shot. It looks like a blast. And

[24:19] I would like to know your thoughts.

[24:20] Again, I don't have all the answers. I

[24:22] don't know one way or the other, but I'm

[24:23] saying what it looks like to me. And

[24:26] just physics alone, it just doesn't make

[24:28] sense from their official story. Anyway

[24:30] guys, I appreciate you hanging out with

[24:32] me. Make sure you stay frosty, stay

[24:33] strapped, and always stay dangerous.

[24:36] Black Scout out.

[24:38] >> Two, three,

[24:42] two.

[24:44] [Music]