WAS CHARLIE KIRK SUPPOSED TO SURVIVE? | A NEW THEORY ABOUT THE SHOT

[00:00] Could it be that Charlie Kirk wasn't

[00:02] supposed to be taken out on 10th of

[00:04] September? That he wasn't supposed to

[00:06] lose his life? Is it possible the

[00:07] original plan was for him to survive it

[00:10] like Trump, but things went wrong? And

[00:12] another thing, is it possible that

[00:14] something or someone shot him from

[00:16] underneath the table in front of him? I

[00:18] know it sounds crazy to some people, but

[00:20] bear with me. I'm going to make it short

[00:22] and to the point, and of course, I will

[00:24] show you evidence that convinced me to

[00:26] finally form an opinion about it. It's

[00:28] been four months and all I see on social

[00:30] media are different theories about

[00:32] Charlie Kirk and I am ready to give you

[00:34] my theory. My tinfoil hat is firmly on

[00:36] cuz don't get me wrong there are many

[00:38] compelling ones out there and I went

[00:40] back and forth in my mind about them but

[00:42] the one with something under the table

[00:45] it just has a chain of events before

[00:47] during and after the event the what

[00:49] happened that supports it for me. It's

[00:51] just a theory. I'm not making

[00:53] accusations. Everything is based on

[00:54] publicly available material. Okay. So

[00:57] have a look at this video. Don't worry,

[00:59] I won't be showing any disturbing

[01:00] images. Everything will be cropped or

[01:02] censored, so you can watch without fear.

[01:04] Here it is. You can see something. The

[01:06] arrows are pointing at something

[01:08] shooting

[01:10] out of from the direction of Charlie's

[01:14] neck, like straight down in a line

[01:18] here.

[01:25] Okay? You see this is this is it

[01:33] where the arrow is pointing

[01:35] it's flying down. So

[01:41] this is what project Constitution wrote.

[01:43] The Charlie Kirk shooting is one of the

[01:45] biggest coverups in American history and

[01:47] the evidence is exploding right in front

[01:49] of us. Forget the fairy tale about Tyler

[01:51] Robinson and his magic 30 odd six from

[01:54] the rooftop. The official story doesn't

[01:56] hold up when you look at the real

[01:58] footage. Charlie was wearing a tempered

[02:00] glass level microphone road wireless

[02:04] style. Stu Peters dropped the bomb. Stu

[02:07] Peters, by the way, is the same guy that

[02:10] uh released the phone call between Mitch

[02:12] and uh Gary. Glass shards everywhere in

[02:15] the transport SUV flying on video during

[02:18] the collapse embedded in clothing.

[02:20] Classic signature of an explosive

[02:22] shatter just like the Hezbollah pager

[02:25] bombs in 2024. But zoom in closer

[02:27] between Charlie's legs in the rally

[02:30] footage. You see that telltale blur, a

[02:33] low-speed projectile ejecting downward.

[02:36] Not a high velocity rifle round.

[02:38] Shrapnel behavior all the way. And

[02:41] here's the kicker that ties it all

[02:43] together. Three months ago, I flagged

[02:44] something bouncing off the inside top of

[02:47] the tent in earlier event footage.

[02:49] Looked exactly like a shell casing. At

[02:52] first glance, everyone dismissed it. I

[02:55] now know 100% believe that was Mike

[02:57] explosion shrapnel, too. Same low

[02:59] velocity frag pattern, same directional

[03:01] ejections, neck area, downward, upward

[03:04] bounce on tent fabric. No bullet path

[03:06] matches the official narrative. No clear

[03:09] entry exit. Glass debris in impossible

[03:11] places. Multiple fragment trajectories.

[03:14] This was a remote detonated, shapen,

[03:16] charged, hidden in the mic battery pack.

[03:19] Hezbollah pager style precision hit.

[03:22] Directional blast instant kill cover

[03:23] debris to blame a lone gunman. The feds

[03:26] want you swallowing one magic bullet.

[03:28] Did all this while ignoring the glass

[03:30] apocalypse on camera. Who's protecting

[03:32] the real killers? Why the rush to pin it

[03:34] on Robinson when the physical evidence

[03:36] screams inside job? Patriots, wake up.

[03:38] This wasn't random. It was calculated.

[03:40] Despite of all this, I don't know why,

[03:42] but I'm having a hard time getting on

[03:44] board with something being detonated. I

[03:46] don't know why because it is compelling.

[03:48] There is many theories that are very

[03:50] compelling and might as well be true.

[03:51] This one might be true, but I want to

[03:54] explore something different because this

[03:57] tweet made me think about what was going

[03:59] on under that table. Would it be

[04:00] possible maybe for Charlie to be shot,

[04:03] but from much closer than anyone thinks?

[04:05] You can clearly see that something is

[04:07] flying super fast in a straight line

[04:09] down from Charlie's next direction. A

[04:11] lot of creators said it was a

[04:12] projectile. I personally could argue

[04:14] that it's a piece of his necklace.

[04:16] That's why it would be so helpful if no

[04:18] one grabbed pieces of the crime scene

[04:20] immediately after the shooting. Frank

[04:22] Turk grabbed the necklace and now Erica

[04:24] fixed it and is wearing it every day.

[04:26] Anyway, back to my theory and it is just

[04:28] a theory, so be kind. If you check this

[04:30] video of the moment of impact and pay

[04:33] attention to the movement of his

[04:34] t-shirt, it looks like something flew

[04:37] quickly upwards close to his chest. This

[04:39] is what the shirt would do. Everyone for

[04:42] months now have been looking at this

[04:44] movement of the t-shirt. And to me, it

[04:46] really looks like a bullet flying or

[04:48] something flying very quickly, very

[04:51] close to his chest, creating that vacuum

[04:54] up towards his neck. We heard Candace

[04:57] Owens saying that the surgeon mentioned

[04:59] that it was most likely a frangible

[05:01] bullet. Bullet that breaks down into

[05:03] pieces once in the body and this would

[05:06] explain the no exit wound. But I want to

[05:08] expand on what I said earlier. I was

[05:10] really overthinking all of it and it

[05:12] popped in my head that it's possible

[05:14] Charlie wasn't supposed to die. It's

[05:16] possible that it was planned for him to

[05:18] get hurt like Trump and then make him a

[05:20] survivor of leftist violence. Tyler

[05:22] Robinson was supposed to be the shooter,

[05:25] but not a murderer. That's why

[05:26] everything that happened after was so

[05:28] stupid and chaotic. They did not think

[05:30] they would be dealing with a murder

[05:31] scene, but it went horribly wrong. Is

[05:34] that why Erica seems to be genuinely

[05:36] struck with grief one moment and

[05:37] suspicious the next?

[05:40] Nah, this woman is just fake. But could

[05:42] it be that she agreed for them to hurt

[05:44] her husband, but she didn't know he was

[05:46] actually going to be killed? Again, this

[05:49] is such a far-fetch. I am admitting it

[05:51] right now. I don't want to go down in

[05:53] the history as a person who threw basis

[05:55] accusations at someone. It's just a

[05:56] theory, but maybe worth exploring

[05:58] because it would explain everyone's

[06:00] weird behavior covering for each other.

[06:02] I know to some of you it will sound

[06:03] insane, but aren't we way past the

[06:05] insane limit at this point? What would

[06:07] happen if Charlie got shot but not

[06:09] killed? Has anyone ever asked this

[06:11] question? Tyler would be arrested and

[06:12] accused of attempted murder. His motive

[06:15] was ready. the weirdly written messages,

[06:17] the alphabet boyfriend, behavior of

[06:19] security team, amazing Mikey McCoy and

[06:21] others would make much more sense

[06:23] because you remember Mikey, he was like

[06:25] already on the he he turned around and

[06:28] walked calmly before Charlie hit the

[06:30] ground. So if he knew that Charlie would

[06:33] get shot but not killed, he would still

[06:36] be calm. He was like, "Okay, everything

[06:37] is going according

[06:41] to the plan." So he's turning around.

[06:42] He's strolling down the street until

[06:44] someone actually catches up with him and

[06:46] is like he was actually killed. He like

[06:48] he's he's dead dead. So that's when the

[06:51] panic sets in. Yeah. That's when he

[06:53] starts making phone calls like oh no we

[06:55] something went effed up. Spin I'm

[06:57] writing fantasy now. Okay. Andrew

[06:59] Kovette told Candice it was supposed to

[07:02] be you. Did he mean Charlie wasn't

[07:04] supposed to be the one losing his life?

[07:06] He was supposed to just be hurt and used

[07:08] as a tool to progress a certain

[07:10] political agenda. It was supposed to be

[07:12] Candace because her theories and things

[07:14] she was saying on her podcast and

[07:15] interviews started spilling over to what

[07:17] Charlie was saying. He was starting to

[07:19] adapt some of her beliefs.

[07:22] I might take some time and actually

[07:23] create that type of alternative timeline

[07:25] because we all keep saying it doesn't

[07:27] make sense how these people behave. From

[07:29] one side they seem to genuinely be

[07:32] shaken by it, but from the other they

[07:34] all act very suspicious. So it's like

[07:37] they knew something bad was going to

[07:38] happen but not that bad. and they cannot

[07:40] talk about it. They cannot say anything

[07:42] because they're all by default guilty.

[07:44] Right. Anyway, another video I saw that

[07:46] I found suspicious is this one. It's

[07:48] recorded by one of the students at UVU.

[07:51] Pay attention.

[07:53] Yes, Charlie's sitting down and his

[07:56] security guy is holding the chair down

[07:58] to make sure that Charlie doesn't move

[07:59] the chair even by a centimeter.

[08:02] Did you see? Let's watch it again.

[08:06] Let's watch it again.

[08:18] He had his hand firm on the chair until

[08:21] Charlie sat down or he let go like right

[08:23] before. I know that there can be other

[08:25] explanations. Charlie is on the platform

[08:27] so they didn't want him to fall. That's

[08:29] one. Also, there are camera angles, said

[08:31] but he was firmly holding the chair in

[08:34] place, making sure it's not 1 cm off. I

[08:37] don't know. I found it odd, as if

[08:38] Charlie had to be in the exact spot they

[08:40] needed him to be. If it was because of

[08:42] the camera angle, how is it a concern of

[08:44] a security guy that the video guys will

[08:46] get a perfect shot? Also, cameras have

[08:48] tripods. They can move and adjust.

[08:50] Another thing that's convincing me is

[08:52] what Baron Coleman noticed at Charlie

[08:54] Kirk's recent stop in Washington State

[08:56] and Texas A&M. His sound man was

[09:00] positioned on a table next to him when

[09:02] he died at UVU. His soundman, the one

[09:04] who can be seen flinching before the

[09:06] bang, was on the ground behind the

[09:08] tablecloth. Why? Why the change of the

[09:11] setup? Another difference was that the

[09:13] covers on the table reached the ground.

[09:15] Actually, there aren't a lot of

[09:17] recordings of pictures that are not

[09:18] blurry to compare it clearly, but here

[09:21] you can see there is no light coming

[09:23] through. The cover is completely to the

[09:26] floor, to the ground, reaching the

[09:28] grass.

[09:30] And then if you take other events from

[09:32] the same

[09:34] tour, they're not reaching the ground.

[09:36] They are actually quite significant

[09:39] quite significantly shorter. Obviously,

[09:41] if Charlie was thrown on the floor and

[09:43] the table covers were shorter as usual,

[09:46] people could see him and could see how

[09:48] his people are taking care of him. So,

[09:50] it makes me wonder if they were created

[09:52] longer on purpose knowing that they will

[09:54] not want anyone to see what was

[09:56] happening on the ground behind the

[09:58] tables. I don't know. They will probably

[10:00] say it's the first time they did it all

[10:01] differently because they were trying new

[10:03] things. They wanted it to look better,

[10:05] but there were just too many new things

[10:06] tested that day. Here are just a few

[10:08] examples. We have what was new or

[10:11] different at the event itself. Outdoor

[10:14] tented event, not indoors. Open

[10:16] courtyard with no controlled entry

[10:18] points. That's huge. No bag checks, no

[10:21] metal detectors, surrounded by

[10:23] multi-story buildings and rooftops. No

[10:26] publicly known rooftop lockdown. No

[10:28] counter sniper or advanced sweep. Prove

[10:30] me wrong open access format basically.

[10:32] And then about security and the

[10:34] personnel ch changes. Six campus police

[10:37] officers assigned some plain clothes.

[10:39] Private security focus on close range

[10:41] only. They didn't scan the rooftops.

[10:43] They weren't like all over the place. No

[10:45] federal lever protective detail.

[10:47] Reliance on temporary or event day

[10:50] personnel. So they had tent and staging

[10:53] crew. They were new or at least most of

[10:55] them. AV sound technicians, campus

[10:58] facilities staff, event organizers,

[11:00] medical standby, EMS, possible

[11:02] thirdparty security contractors.

[11:04] We heard Candice Owens say it and she

[11:08] named the people that were actually new.

[11:10] Here are unknowns that matter. Who had

[11:13] roof access? Who approved the layout?

[11:15] Whether rooftops were checked or

[11:16] monitored, what security protocols were

[11:18] different from previous events? You

[11:21] remember the interview with Brian

[11:22] Harpool who said, "Oh my god, we

[11:23] couldn't fly drones." But in his

[11:25] interview, Frank Turk was like, "Oh,

[11:27] yeah. We were pulling up for the event

[11:28] and we were receiving drone footage

[11:30] live."

[11:32] Which is it? I'm telling you, they are

[11:34] acting weird. It's It's They weren't

[11:36] ready for They were ready for something,

[11:38] but they weren't ready for that much.

[11:40] Everything was new that day, and it

[11:42] became an excuse for every weird thing

[11:44] that happened. We were testing stuff. It

[11:46] was his first day on the job. We were

[11:48] experimenting. None of this proves

[11:50] anything by itself, but when you line it

[11:52] all up, these are exactly the details

[11:54] investigators usually look at first.

[11:56] Anyway, we all saw this video multiple

[11:58] times, and I want you to pay attention

[12:00] to this guy. Okay, I'm circling him now.

[12:02] I'll play the video. Pay attention to

[12:04] his behavior. So, this obviously is

[12:07] right after

[12:10] Charlie's

[12:15] collapsed on the floor.

[12:18] I don't know what they're doing. They're

[12:19] on top of him. The video is going back

[12:21] and forth, guys. So, it's not like a

[12:27] smooth video from start to beginning. I

[12:29] just want you to see at this moment,

[12:32] someone jumped over the table. You can

[12:33] see the table tipping over. That person

[12:37] is coming into the frame.

[12:41] The guy I told you to pay attention to,

[12:44] he turned on his Google glasses. Here

[12:46] you go.

[12:48] He's pushing the chair off of the

[12:50] platform and suddenly he notices

[12:52] something

[12:55] and he dives under the table. Why is he

[12:59] diving under the table? What is he doing

[13:01] there? What did he see? What did he

[13:03] find? What? What is he?

[13:07] This video was originally made to

[13:10] obviously

[13:12] analyze what they were doing and how if

[13:14] they were performing CPR or some kind of

[13:17] first aid to Charlie. They were trying

[13:19] to stop bleeding and um you know his

[13:24] hand is showing at some point because

[13:25] they're lifting it.

[13:28] But just recently I saw this guy is

[13:30] diving under the table. Why? What is in

[13:32] there? It might only look like this.

[13:34] Maybe it's the angle, but it looks like

[13:36] he pushes the fallen chair out of the

[13:38] way. The front table slightly moves and

[13:40] then he just goes under the table. So,

[13:42] he saw something or he needed to fix

[13:44] something, grab something from there. I

[13:46] don't know. I think it might have been

[13:48] also the fact that the guy that jumped

[13:49] over the table and tipped it over, it

[13:52] lifted the cover slightly up and maybe

[13:56] the guy wanted to pull it back down to

[13:58] cover them. I don't know. It's just it's

[14:01] weird the way their brains were working

[14:03] that day. Like I said, I am okay with

[14:05] being wrong when it comes to my theory.

[14:07] I don't expect to be the person who

[14:09] solved one of the biggest mysteries of

[14:11] our century, but I'm sharing my

[14:12] observations so maybe someone else

[14:14] smarter than me can either completely

[14:16] debunk it or take it to the next level.

[14:19] Both will be equally helpful. Anyway,

[14:20] after Charlie was escorted to the

[14:22] hospital, there is this guy

[14:24] disassembling the cameras and taking the

[14:26] SD cards out of them. He even pulls

[14:29] Charlie's bloody chair, stands on it,

[14:31] and takes the camera down. Everyone

[14:33] found this insane except the TP USA guys

[14:36] who defended his actions. This guy's

[14:38] name is Terrell Farnsworth. Okay. And we

[14:41] found out recently that someone from his

[14:44] family,

[14:46] uncle or cousin, I don't remember

[14:48] exactly, but someone from his family is

[14:51] on defense team of Taylor Robinson. I

[14:53] don't know. Fact check me on this, but

[14:55] insane. Nobody's looking in there under

[14:58] the table. All attention is driven away

[15:00] from that tent. Here is the video. We

[15:02] all know it by heart by now. Here they

[15:04] are just hanging. You know, Charlie was

[15:08] just taken to the hospital. Everyone ran

[15:11] away. They're all slowly coming back to

[15:13] see what's going on. They are able to

[15:14] walk around.

[15:17] There were people even taking hats off

[15:18] the table at some point. And here is

[15:22] tarot.

[15:26] just taking the camera,

[15:29] standing on Charlie's chair. There you

[15:32] go.

[15:35] We see him there looking around and

[15:37] taking out SD cards from the camera,

[15:40] putting them in his pocket.

[15:43] The other guy just texting

[15:46] just, you know, day like every day.

[15:49] Oh, cool.

[15:51] Where are the cups? Where is the yellow

[15:54] tape? I'm telling you, it seems like

[15:57] they were ready for something, but they

[15:59] weren't ready for this. That's why it

[16:02] look it all looks so confusing. Ah, now

[16:05] after 1 minute 15 seconds, someone came

[16:08] and told the camera guy to move up. Oh,

[16:10] it's a crime scene. Yeah. Okay. Now that

[16:13] we disassembled it, took all our

[16:15] equipment, everyone took whatever they

[16:17] wanted to. Now it's a crime scene. Now

[16:19] we're going to start investigating and

[16:21] protecting it.

[16:23] Cool. Again, nobody, as far as we know,

[16:28] because there is no footage of it and we

[16:30] have a lot of footage to to look at.

[16:33] Nobody checked under the table. Security

[16:36] should have been there within a second,

[16:38] making sure nobody touches anything. Why

[16:40] were they all running around like

[16:41] headless chickens? I would like to see a

[16:43] written timeline of the events. For

[16:44] example, when did actually FBI appear

[16:46] and taped out the scene? Because we have

[16:48] this picture. It's all taped out. Okay.

[16:51] Yellow tape around. When did it happen?

[16:54] What time exactly? Did they wait for TP

[16:56] USA to first, you know, grab your

[16:58] things, guys. Check what you need and

[17:00] then we're going to And then you can't

[17:02] come here anymore. We need to start

[17:05] paving. It's serious, guys. You know me

[17:07] now. By now you It's serious. I know.

[17:09] How long was this place? This is the

[17:12] question. Open to anybody to walk by. If

[17:14] you can see, TP USA packed up first.

[17:16] They took all their stuff. This tweet

[17:18] points it out. By the way, I found this

[17:20] tweet. It says, "Authorities on all

[17:23] sides watching them steal the video.

[17:25] This will forever be disturbing. Just

[17:27] out in front of everyone because they

[17:29] don't care." The excuse he gave, he

[17:32] wanted to give it to authorities. They

[17:34] were right next to him. So, yes,

[17:36] exactly. TP USA, the guys were on the

[17:38] podcast and they were saying, "Oh, Terl,

[17:40] he he needed to secure the footage

[17:43] because he was like, there are bad

[17:44] people out there." Okay, cool. We know.

[17:48] Look what happened. There is another

[17:50] video, another angle of them playing

[17:54] with the crime scene. Here it is.

[17:58] There you go. Freely just walking

[17:59] around. And you can see it's right at

[18:01] the beginning. There are still hats on

[18:02] the table.

[18:06] He's like, "Oh, did I did I grab my

[18:08] keys? Do I have my phone? Did I get

[18:11] Charlie's necklace? Some pieces?" Frank

[18:15] Turk talked about taking Charlie's

[18:16] necklace. Erica is wearing it now. How

[18:18] is it not evidence that should have

[18:20] stayed there? And we all know because

[18:22] Erica told us that she has his phone. I

[18:24] was actually, not Turk, Charlie's. I was

[18:27] actually told by one of my subscribers

[18:29] whose husband was also unfortunately

[18:31] killed that she didn't receive any of

[18:33] his belongings until after the trial was

[18:35] concluded. So, what is this weird

[18:38] pattern in this case? And as a cherry on

[18:40] the cake, just a few days later, they

[18:42] paved over the whole crime scene because

[18:44] contaminating it and dismantling it

[18:47] wasn't enough. Here it is. Let's see.

[18:49] What are they doing? Cuz I see a lot of

[18:51] construction um smoke going on. Oh no.

[18:55] They are constructing

[18:58] they are taking out the whole platform

[19:02] where he was sitting and they are

[19:04] constructing a new one as you could see.

[19:08] So that's what the change is. And guess

[19:12] what? The killer was there at there. And

[19:15] there was a video taken from here. And

[19:18] that's where you see a killer running

[19:20] behind in the background.

[19:22] And I was like right here when it

[19:25] happened. So

[19:28] this is what is happening right now.

[19:32] I think

[19:34] Oh, as you can see, my boss is still

[19:36] there. They are taking the things

[19:39] inside. So, I'm going to go inside and

[19:41] see.

[19:42] >> Apparently, the prosecutor of the case

[19:44] didn't know that the crime scene was

[19:45] paved over. Like, what? What do you mean

[19:47] there's no crime scene? It's gone. And

[19:49] if you watch this video closely, you can

[19:51] see the exact place on the ground they

[19:53] are focusing on for some reason. Why was

[19:56] there something buried in the ground?

[19:57] Let me fix my tinfall hat. Was there

[19:59] some pieces of bullet or something else

[20:01] that they couldn't risk anybody finding?

[20:04] I don't know if we will ever find

[20:05] answers to these questions, but what I

[20:07] can do is list things that point out to

[20:10] my theory being at least one of the

[20:12] possibilities. So, we start with why

[20:14] some people question the official

[20:16] trajectory. And it's not some people,

[20:18] it's most people. Neck entry wound

[20:20] discussed more than chest entry. No

[20:22] widely shown full ballistic trajectory

[20:24] diagram. Trajectory could theor

[20:26] theoretically move upward if originating

[20:29] low. Event and physical layout

[20:30] questions. Table directly in front of

[20:32] Charlie Kirk. Under table area, natural

[20:34] vis visual blind spot. Cameras and

[20:37] crowds focus forward and upward, not

[20:39] downward. Fitness and reaction

[20:41] inconsistencies. Early witness reactions

[20:44] reportedly reportedly varied on

[20:46] direction. Yes, a lot of witness. It

[20:49] came from right, it came from, it came

[20:50] from up, it came from down. So depending

[20:53] where you were standing, that's where it

[20:55] came from. If it came from far, I think

[20:58] everyone would like turn. It would sound

[21:00] the same to everyone. I don't know.

[21:03] Sound localization unclear. In initial

[21:05] moments, immediate collapse interpreted

[21:07] by some as close-range shock. Security

[21:10] response observations. Security reacted

[21:13] outward toward expected threats. No

[21:16] immediate focus on near field or

[21:19] internal blind spots. Why the theory

[21:21] persists online? Lack of publicly

[21:23] detailed angle reconstruction under

[21:25] table space rarely documented on camera.

[21:27] Proximity plus open access format fuels

[21:30] alternative questions. I am not saying

[21:32] this is what happened. I'm not accusing

[21:34] anyone. I'm not claiming I solved

[21:36] anything. I'm just sharing the theory

[21:38] that makes the most sense to me after

[21:40] months of looking at this case and going

[21:42] back and forth in my head. I am truly

[21:44] hoping someone will see it and examine

[21:47] it and maybe come up with something out

[21:50] of it. What bothers me is that there are

[21:52] too many weird things and every single

[21:54] one of them gets brushed off with, "Oh,

[21:56] it was new. Oh, it was chaos. Oh, it was

[21:58] just a mistake." The wound, the videos,

[22:00] the table, the covers reaching the

[22:01] ground, the guy reaching under the table

[22:03] right after the shot, the chair being

[22:05] held in a very specific place, the

[22:07] cameras being taken down, personal items

[22:09] being removed, the scene left open, and

[22:12] then the whole area being paved over

[22:13] days later. Any one of these things on

[22:16] its own doesn't mean much but when you

[22:18] put them all together it starts to feel

[22:20] uncomfortable like something doesn't

[22:22] fully add up and we have been going

[22:24] through it for the past four months. The

[22:26] reason I keep coming back to this theory

[22:28] is because it could explain a lot of the

[22:30] behavior we saw after the shooting. If

[22:32] Charlie wasn't supposed to die, if he

[22:34] was supposed to be injured, then

[22:35] suddenly everything that followed makes

[22:37] more sense to me. the confusion, the bad

[22:39] decisions, the lack of control, the way

[22:42] people were acting like they were

[22:43] dealing with an accident, not a murder

[22:46] scene. But I don't think it's crazy to

[22:47] ask questions when there are this many

[22:49] unanswered ones, especially when all the

[22:51] material I'm using is publicly

[22:53] available. I'm not asking you to agree

[22:56] with me. I'm just putting my thoughts

[22:57] out there. Right now, pretending

[22:58] everything about this case is normal

[23:00] doesn't feel honest. But as usual, I

[23:02] want to know what you guys think. Did

[23:04] the shot that take out Charlie Kirk

[23:06] possibly came from under the table or

[23:08] somewhere very close around him? Is it

[23:10] possible that the original plan wasn't

[23:12] to kick him? Let me know in the

[23:13] comments. If you enjoyed this video,

[23:15] make sure to like and share it. And if

[23:16] you haven't yet, please subscribe to my

[23:18] channel, turn on the notifications to

[23:19] never miss another Daily Fredo episode.

[23:21] And for even more content, follow me on

[23:23] Instagram and XFredo. That's all for

[23:25] today. Have a good one.