Amazon AWS Outage Exposes Internet Vulnerability While Another Attempt on Trump's Life Was Stopped

[00:00] Did we just witness how you can shut

[00:02] down the entire internet for everyone in

[00:04] the world? It sure seems like it. And it

[00:06] was all because of a disruption in

[00:08] Amazon's AWS services.

[00:11] >> Many of the world's biggest apps and

[00:12] online games, including Snapchat,

[00:14] Dualingo, and Roblox, have gone down. An

[00:17] issue affecting Amazon's cloud computing

[00:20] service, Amazon Web Services.

[00:22] >> So, every single website you care about

[00:25] is down. Every important website is down

[00:28] right now. This is one of those cases

[00:30] where we're like, don't tie to AWS. And

[00:33] I remember even when I was at AWS, they

[00:35] said, that's ridiculous. If if AWS is

[00:38] down, the whole internet is down. Well,

[00:40] okay, there's a lot of the internet

[00:42] that's down right now. But you see, even

[00:44] if a website isn't using AWS, it can be

[00:47] using a third-party service that is

[00:49] reliant on AWS. And that's why so many

[00:53] critical apps and websites went down all

[00:55] at the same time. you don't know where

[00:58] the hidden dependency is. So if you have

[01:00] a third-party component to your service,

[01:04] it may be dependent on AWS. And you may

[01:07] be saying, but I'm not using AWS in

[01:09] Virginia. I'm using DynamoB. Well, guess

[01:12] what? DynamoB depends on Virginia. Now,

[01:15] Amazon has tried to explain what led to

[01:17] this, but I have a very important

[01:20] question here. If someone wants to shut

[01:22] down our biggest source of information,

[01:25] can't they do it by simply attacking

[01:27] Amazon's critical service? And all of

[01:29] this was happening when apparently we

[01:32] stopped yet another attempt on President

[01:34] Trump's life. You see, during a security

[01:37] sweep around the airport in West Palm

[01:39] Beach, Florida, the Secret Service found

[01:41] a hunting stand that had a direct line

[01:44] of sight of the president disembarking

[01:47] Air Force One.

[01:50] Breaking news at 6. A hunting stand with

[01:52] a direct line of sight to where

[01:54] President Trump exits Air Force One was

[01:56] spotted in West Palm Beach last week.

[01:59] >> Now, many news outlets are busy telling

[02:01] us that it was put up there by a hunter,

[02:03] but that doesn't make any sense at all

[02:05] when you look at the map. You see, this

[02:07] stand was located in a very small patch

[02:10] of woods, which is surrounded by

[02:12] freeways and a United States Military

[02:15] Reserve facility. Now, it's on the bank

[02:17] of a canal, but any hunter will tell you

[02:19] that you're not hunting for any wildlife

[02:22] in this kind of an area. From what I've

[02:24] seen, it also is around 600 yardds from

[02:26] the tarmac. And there is absolutely no

[02:29] obstruction between this stand and Air

[02:31] Force One. I'm sure you can see why

[02:34] people think it was more like a sniper

[02:36] nest than it was a hunting stand. Now,

[02:38] of course, Dan Bonino says that they're

[02:40] doing everything they possibly can to

[02:42] find out who set it up. director was uh

[02:44] Cash Patel was directly involved right

[02:46] away. I'm on the email chain with him.

[02:48] He ordered an immediate immediate

[02:50] response and all of the forensic tools

[02:53] we have uh from digital tools to

[02:56] biometric tools, they are all going to

[02:58] be applied to try to find out who put

[03:00] this up there. Well, since they're so

[03:02] good at finding people with the help of

[03:05] CCTV footage, I'm sure they can easily

[03:08] get this guy, too, because of course

[03:10] there's got to be a camera recording of

[03:11] that patch of the woods. Interestingly,

[03:14] all of this has come at a time when

[03:15] people like Robert Dairo are saying

[03:18] crazy things like this on national

[03:20] television.

[03:21] >> No, I like what Nuome has done because

[03:23] he's trolled him and he's gone and he's

[03:25] fought fire with fire and that's what

[03:26] you have to do. And he called him an

[03:28] invasive species, which is what he is.

[03:31] Um, so he's not so he he's a thing that

[03:33] doesn't understand. Trump does not

[03:36] understand

[03:37] anything about humanity, people. He has

[03:41] no empathy. I don't know where what he

[03:44] is, but he's an alien and he wants to he

[03:49] wants to hurt this country. It's

[03:51] something deeply psychological in him.

[03:53] He wants to hurt people. He wants to

[03:56] hurt this country. He doesn't care. And

[03:58] what's what saddens me the most, upsets

[04:01] me the most is that people follow him

[04:03] and they think and they kiss his ass and

[04:05] they look up to him and he's I mean, I

[04:08] don't understand it. I don't understand

[04:10] the people in his cabinet some Rubio

[04:14] other one how they can live with

[04:16] themselves

[04:17] after what they've allowed him to do and

[04:19] not stood up even walk out of the room

[04:21] when what they did with Zalinski the

[04:23] first time Rubio looking at his face

[04:25] they got the camera on him he if he had

[04:28] balls he would have walked out

[04:29] >> well even if we ignore that Mr. Dairo

[04:32] was working with a monster like Harvey

[04:34] Weinstein. We cannot ignore his support

[04:37] for slimy guys like Gavin Newsome. Don't

[04:39] forget how Newsome was laughing after

[04:42] the LA fires because he knew he was

[04:44] going to sell that land to property

[04:46] developers. I'm I was just talking to

[04:48] Josh Green, the governor uh of uh uh

[04:51] down in in Hawaii, who had some ideas

[04:53] around some land use concerns he has

[04:55] around speculators coming in, buying up

[04:58] properties uh and the like. So, we're

[05:00] already working with our legal teams to

[05:02] uh to move those things forward.

[05:03] >> He has also been accused of helping PG&E

[05:06] after they pleaded guilty to 84 felony

[05:09] counts of involuntary manslaughter for

[05:12] causing the Paradise Fire.

[05:13] >> Governor, why is it okay for you to take

[05:15] money from a felon?

[05:17] >> Uh, and you know that the way you frame

[05:19] that is going to lead me to I don't know

[05:21] what you're

[05:21] >> PG&E was convicted of a federal of six

[05:23] federal felonies in 2016. After that,

[05:26] you took more than $200,000 to help get

[05:28] elected. I I wish you luck with whatever

[05:31] you're working on, but uh that's a

[05:32] strange question.

[05:33] >> So yeah, I don't think people are going

[05:35] to listen to anyone who supports Newsome

[05:37] and especially not an actor who worked

[05:39] with Harvey Weinstein and never spoke

[05:41] out against him. Now, while all of this

[05:44] was going on, another wild story came

[05:46] out about those drones that terrified

[05:49] people last winter.

[06:09] Oh my god, Peter.

[06:20] >> It's coming towards us. According to the

[06:23] New York Post, a private company at a

[06:25] high-powered army conference

[06:27] demonstrated a unique aircraft at the

[06:29] event and allegedly took responsibility

[06:32] for setting off last year's drone and

[06:35] UFO pandemonium in New Jersey. The

[06:37] article also states the company was in

[06:40] the air over the Garden State in

[06:42] November 2024 to test out their

[06:45] capabilities. Now, they shared photos of

[06:47] this special aircraft in the article,

[06:49] but there's also this footage that shows

[06:52] the alleged aircraft in flight.

[06:57] [music]

[07:03] [music]

[07:07] [music]

[07:12] >> [music]

[07:14] >> Now, according to the article, this

[07:16] defense contractor was not required to

[07:18] disclose their activity to the public

[07:20] because of a private government

[07:22] contract. This also fits in with what

[07:24] Caroline Levit told us about drones.

[07:27] >> After research and study, the drones

[07:29] that were flying over New Jersey in

[07:31] large numbers were authorized to be

[07:33] flown by the FAA for research and

[07:37] various other reasons. Many of these

[07:39] drones were also hobbyists,

[07:41] recreational, and private individuals

[07:44] that enjoy flying drones. In meantime,

[07:46] in the in time, it got worse due to

[07:49] curiosity. This was not the enemy.

[07:52] >> However, the question is when millions

[07:54] of people were panicking, why did these

[07:56] agencies keep quiet about this deal?

[07:58] They could have just told us that they

[07:59] were testing some special aircraft, but

[08:02] they only added to everyone's panic.

[08:05] This story also does not explain all

[08:07] those mysterious drones that were

[08:09] spotted near the military bases. Also,

[08:12] if those drones were just some

[08:13] prototypes for a new kind of aircraft,

[08:16] why were the authorities asking people

[08:18] to stay away from any crashed drone?

[08:22] First of all, they are telling people to

[08:24] stay the hell away from any crashed

[08:26] drones. And on top of that, they are

[08:28] asking their employees to evacuate

[08:30] people in every direction up to 330 ft.

[08:35] They also ask fire service members to

[08:37] use personal protective equipment while

[08:40] evacuating people. And after notifying

[08:42] law enforcement and more interestingly,

[08:44] the FBI about a crashed drone, the fire

[08:48] service members are asked to call a

[08:50] local hazmat team to the site. The

[08:52] hazardous material response teams are

[08:55] also instructed in this bulletin to

[08:57] establish radiation monitoring systems

[08:59] after reaching the crash site. And as if

[09:02] all these instructions weren't already

[09:04] scary enough, the fire service members

[09:06] are also very clearly told to call the

[09:09] nearest bomb squad to the site. To me,

[09:12] it just seems like this company is

[09:13] trying to use drone mania to hype up

[09:16] their new product. As for those drones

[09:18] we saw, I think they were part of some

[09:20] kind of test by our agencies. And if

[09:22] that's true, we're not going to know the

[09:25] whole thing for a very long time. Now,

[09:27] moving on from this, I want to talk

[09:29] about some very concerning updates in

[09:31] the Charlie Kirk case. I'm sure you've

[09:33] seen this video of the judge issuing a

[09:36] gag order to stop any witness from

[09:38] talking about what they saw.

[09:39] >> There is a substantial amount of

[09:41] discovery in this case, your honor. It's

[09:44] voluminous to say the least. His lawyers

[09:46] entered their formal appearance and

[09:48] declined to wave his right to a

[09:49] preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graph

[09:51] has issued a gag order preventing anyone

[09:54] associated with the case from talking

[09:55] about it.

[09:56] >> Now, they tried to explain why they're

[09:58] giving this gag order.

[10:00] >> There are a number of witnesses that

[10:01] have yet to be identified uh that would

[10:04] likely be used in the state's case. Uh

[10:06] this occurred in front of 2 to 3,000

[10:09] students at Utah Valley University. Uh

[10:11] so we're in the process of identifying

[10:13] those witnesses and so those individuals

[10:15] are presently unknown right now.

[10:16] >> The court will rule that as the

[10:18] witnesses become known to each side that

[10:21] that information is conveyed to abide by

[10:24] this order. Obviously there are

[10:26] potentially uh many witnesses and so

[10:29] it's not the expectation that you would

[10:32] be able to do that upfront but as they

[10:34] become known.

[10:35] >> I think this explains why we don't have

[10:38] more footage of this incident. It also

[10:40] explains why we didn't see real

[10:42] witnesses getting interviewed by the

[10:43] press. Instead, we were bombarded by

[10:46] those dramatic videos of strange

[10:48] individuals.

[10:51] >> One, two, three.

[10:52] >> I saw Charlie Kirk get shot.

[10:56] >> I saw Charlie Kirk get shot.

[10:59] >> He collapsed in his seat. He fell over

[11:01] to the side. He was carried off.

[11:05] He had blood on his arms. He had blood

[11:07] on his shirt. He was dragged off and

[11:09] carried out of the venue. There was a

[11:10] gunshot that rang out.

[11:13] >> You okay?

[11:14] >> I'm No, I'm not okay. I saw someone get

[11:16] shot today.

[11:18] >> Yeah. So,

[11:21] >> I saw Charlie Kirk get shot. He

[11:24] collapsed in his seat. He fell over to

[11:26] the side. He was carried off. He had

[11:28] blood on his arms. He had blood on his

[11:29] shirt. He was dragged off and carried

[11:31] out of the venue. There was a gunshot

[11:33] that rang out.

[11:35] >> You okay? I'm No, I'm not. Okay. I saw

[11:38] someone get shot today.

[11:39] >> Yeah. Don't question.

[11:43] >> Did you guys see what happened?

[11:44] >> Yes. I saw him. What's Are you recording

[11:46] this?

[11:47] >> Yes, you're live right now. Well, we're

[11:48] we're recording. I don't know if we're

[11:50] live because of the cell service.

[11:51] >> So,

[11:52] >> hang on.

[11:52] >> I was standing in probably the third

[11:55] Okay. I was standing from probably the

[11:57] third row in the bottom. I saw him. I

[12:00] heard the shot ring out. I looked to my

[12:02] left and then I looked over to my right.

[12:04] I saw him slump over in his chair

[12:07] forward. He slumped over. He had blood

[12:09] coming from the left side of his neck

[12:12] down his shirt and he slumped over and

[12:14] he was carried off.

[12:18] >> Get off me.

[12:24] >> Running high right now.

[12:35] Everybody's in shock, including myself.

[12:42] >> Where's your mama?

[13:09] The gag order also pretty much stops

[13:11] anyone from talking to a witness or a

[13:14] member of Tyler's family. However, in

[13:16] response to all the discussion about the

[13:18] gag order, Candace Owens just tweeted

[13:20] this. Don't worry about the gag order in

[13:22] the Charlie Kirk case. I plan to violate

[13:25] it on the world's behalf. The things

[13:27] I've discovered this past week are

[13:29] enough to burn the house down. Yes,

[13:33] Charlie was betrayed by everyone. At

[13:35] least she hasn't given up on finding the

[13:37] truth about Charlie's assassination. And

[13:40] since we're talking about Charlie, I

[13:41] want to show you what he had recently

[13:43] said about the Epstein Files. What's

[13:45] your opinion on the phase 1 release of

[13:47] the Epstein Files? Do you think it was

[13:48] more of a PR stunt with Pam Bondi

[13:50] because she just got into office? What

[13:52] do you think is actually going on? And

[13:54] do you think that she genuinely has the

[13:55] files or people are destroying them?

[13:57] >> Well, I think they got to make this

[13:58] right. I mean, we we we as the American

[14:00] people deserve to have every Epstein

[14:02] file released with no redactions

[14:04] whatsoever. Period. They got to make it

[14:05] right. And we, the American people, ran

[14:07] on transparency. We deserve to see the

[14:10] entire client list. Every document the

[14:12] government has regarding the Epstein

[14:13] files, we, the American people, should

[14:15] have on an easy to access website

[14:17] immediately in a very, very quick

[14:20] fashion. I'm I'm pushing for that both

[14:21] privately and publicly, just so you

[14:23] know.

[14:23] >> You see, it just becomes clear by the

[14:26] second that Charlie was beginning to ask

[14:28] the tough questions. And that's probably

[14:30] why someone decided to silence him

[14:32] forever. And now those same billionaires

[14:35] who were partying with Epstein are

[14:36] trying to track our everyday activities

[14:39] with things like digital IDs. Luckily,

[14:42] not everyone is asleep and thousands of

[14:44] people in the UK are now protesting

[14:46] against digital ID that has been imposed

[14:49] onto them by their government.

[14:52] >> Thank you,

[14:54] everyone.

[15:03] to digital RD. We say no to digital RD.

[15:09] We say no to digital RD.

[15:15] >> Say no to digital.

[15:23] And they are protesting because

[15:25] companies are already telling people how

[15:27] much of their carbon allowance they're

[15:29] using while eating prepackaged

[15:31] sandwiches. And it's all according to

[15:34] their 2030 agenda.

[15:36] >> We're developing

[15:38] through technology an ability for

[15:40] consumers to measure their own carbon

[15:42] footprint.

[15:44] What does that mean? That's where are

[15:46] they traveling, how are they traveling,

[15:49] what are they eating, what are they

[15:51] consuming on the platform. So individual

[15:54] carbon footprint tracker.

[15:57] >> Stay tuned. We don't have it operational

[15:59] yet, but this is something that we're

[16:00] working on.

[16:01] >> If that doesn't show you what they're

[16:03] planning, I don't know what else will.

[16:05] Now, in the UK, the man responsible for

[16:08] this digital ID madness is none other

[16:11] than their former prime minister, Tony

[16:13] Blair. We cannot continue with business

[16:15] as usual and change is inevitable. This

[16:18] is where technology like digital ID

[16:21] becomes critical. My institute's own

[16:23] analysis shows that introducing this in

[16:26] the UK would save at least 2 billion a

[16:30] year and likely more by reducing losses

[16:33] to fraud, improving tax collection, and

[16:35] better targeting of state support.

[16:37] >> And Tony has been promoting digital IDs

[16:40] alongside Bill Gates for years now. And

[16:43] that's exactly why we cannot allow Bill

[16:45] Gates to put any more influence onto our

[16:48] politicians. He has all the money in the

[16:50] world to get exactly what he wants. And

[16:53] unless we call him out, he'll keep

[16:55] shoving his insane projects onto the

[16:57] people of this