Andrew Kolvet on Charlie Kirk's Legacy as Coalition Builder and the Conservative Movement's Path Forward

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Peacemaking Legacy and Calls for Conservative Unity at AmericaFest

Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Peacemaking Legacy and Calls for Conservative Unity at AmericaFest

20:47

Isabel Brown Honors Charlie Kirk's Legacy at AmericaFest With Andrew Kolvet and Mikey McCoy

Isabel Brown Honors Charlie Kirk's Legacy at AmericaFest With Andrew Kolvet and Mikey McCoy

1:09:17

Nicki Minaj at AmericaFest Defends Christians, President Trump, and the Right to Think Freely

Nicki Minaj at AmericaFest Defends Christians, President Trump, and the Right to Think Freely

32:04

Andrew Kolvet on Charlie Kirk's Legacy as Coalition Builder and the Conservative Movement's Path Forward

Andrew Kolvet reflects on Charlie Kirk's ability to unite diverse voices within the conservative movement and addresses the internal debates that have emerged since his assassination. Speaking at AmericaFest 2025, Kolvet discusses why these political fights were inevitable, how conservatives can navigate disagreements without turning on each other, and why the movement must hold the left accountable for dehumanizing rhetoric. He also reveals Turning Point Action's commitment to supporting JD Vance and explains why real-life events like AmericaFest are essential antidotes to the toxicity of social media. Kolvet emphasizes that while conservatives are independent-minded free thinkers prone to rowdy debate, they must balance that with political effectiveness and remember what Charlie stood for: more free speech, more debate, and building the biggest winning coalition possible.

December 24, 2025

Charlie Kirk's Role as Coalition Builder

Andrew Kolvet addresses the observation that Charlie Kirk served as a unifying force within the conservative movement, someone who brought together voices on the right that didn't always agree with each other. Since Kirk's assassination, there has been visible fighting within the movement, leading many to wonder about the future of conservative unity.

Kolvet confirms this observation is directionally true but provides important context. As someone who had private conversations with Kirk for years, Kolvet explains they could see these debates coming long before the assassination occurred. The conversations about Israel, foreign policy, how and when to use the United States military, and immigration were inevitable. Kirk's assassination may have accelerated these debates, but it didn't create them.

In some ways, Kolvet welcomes these debates because the fissures and dividing lines were visible from far away to anyone paying attention. He believes that by 2026, when Democrat socialists are on the ticket representing people who fundamentally hate America and disagree with the founding story, a new coalition will emerge. It may not look exactly like Trump's winning coalition in 2024, but it will probably look mostly the same. Every couple of years, conservatives have to rebuild coalitions, and that's simply the nature of politics.

Embracing Debate Without Fear

For conservatives, Kolvet argues, the key is not being afraid of the fight or the debate. The movement should welcome it rather than try to cancel people. By letting the chips fall where they may, conservatives will find good answers. If the movement really embraces debate, it will find a consensus that people can actually buy into.

Despite the horror of Kirk's assassination, there was a brief moment of clarity where the conservative movement was united and ready to join forces and close ranks against the left. However, the movement has seemed distracted since then, with some fallout and internal arguments. Kolvet is asked why conservatives seem so easily distracted from focusing on the left, constantly losing sight of that goal and turning on each other to argue about trivial matters.

Kolvet describes this as a multivariant analysis with multiple contributing reasons. One reason is the commentator, YouTube, and podcast culture that has emerged. While this was a good and important development needed to push back against establishment legacy media, even independent voices with their own channels are still tempted to go down certain paths or react to certain things. The incentive structure is such that these voices are not necessarily incentivized to call out truth when needed or do much more than get along, ignore issues, and keep the status quo. This can ultimately breed weeds in the garden.

Free Speech and Prudent Coalition Building

Kolvet emphasizes that Charlie Kirk was all about more free speech, more debate, and trying to expand the tent as large and as big as possible to form a winning coalition. It's about finding balance. When you have to live in tension between competing right answers, you have to learn to live in that tension and use prudence. Kirk was all about using prudence—not everyone is invited to AmericaFest, but the goal is to make it as big as feasible.

If there's going to be a debate or a row within the conservative movement, this is a good time to have it. In December, with midterms coming up in 2026 and the presidential election in 2028, the movement needs to get it together at some point. These debates need to happen so the movement can move on to the extent possible.

As for why it's happening, Kolvet explains that conservatives are just rowdy people, independent-minded individuals. They're not like the left, which is collectivist and tends to take marching orders from the top like the Borg, marching in one direction. Conservatives have to hash things out. People need to keep telling themselves they don't need to be afraid—embrace it, enjoy existing within this tension, and learn that this is actually what politics is all about.

Learning from the Left's Unity While Playing to Conservative Strengths

When asked whether conservatives can take notes from the left—specifically regarding how Democrats would react if a prominent left-wing figure were assassinated on camera while Democrats were in control—Kolvet acknowledges the frustration. The left would start committees over far less, initiate such a crackdown, and demonstrate their hive mind collectivism where everyone gets on board.

Kolvet admits there are political points where he is jealous of the left and their ability to operate as a unified collective with no infighting or voting against the establishment. There's utility in that politically. However, conservatives have to play with the cards they're dealt. Those cards include a bunch of independent-minded free thinkers who make up the coalition. The ideas are better, and the quality of the people is better, but this coalition is also prone to some excesses—conspiratorial thinking and rowdy infighting. You have to take the good with the bad.

Still, Kolvet says he'll take the conservative side any day because their ideas actually work and they can get things done for the country that are important. Sometimes he is jealous of the left, but there comes a point where the movement has to distinguish between ideological debate and political debate. When operating within the realm of politics, conservatives need to buckle up, swallow their pride, and get political actions done.

Lawmakers Need to Stop Being Influencers

Kolvet shares a point he learned from Mike Cernovich: conservatives want their lawmakers to stop being influencers. If you're a lawmaker, do congressional things, do political things—go behind doors, even if it's a smoke-filled back room. Just get it right. Get the vote right, whip the votes, and make sure to do what the side needs done. Stop trying to be influencers or social media provocateurs. Do what you were elected to do.

The movement needs to put lawmakers back in their proper boxes because when roles intermingle, it gets messier. This isn't to say elected officials can't have a public profile—that's great, and they should. But everyone should remember what role they play in this space so they can be most effective.

The Left's Grotesque Celebration and Political Violence

When Kirk was assassinated, the left reacted by celebrating—not all of the left, but it was a major mask-off moment. People in healthcare, public service, and schools, including educators teaching children, displayed grotesque reactions. Even recently, a Target employee was harassed in the store, and Kirk's supporters are harassed seemingly on a daily basis. The question arises: How do you have political discourse with people who would celebrate if you were murdered over your political views?

Kolvet's answer is simple: you really can't. It's a sad truth. Kirk was a big believer that America was meant for a Christian people, and when you have a whole political movement that has essentially kicked God out of its political policies and the planks of its campaign and apparatus, that movement is going to corrupt itself. You get a value system that is turned upside down, and that's essentially what exists on the American left right now.

But you have to keep working on it and keep finding sane voices. Kolvet gives an example: he does not like the way John Fetterman votes, but he gives credit where it's due. Fetterman has emerged as a reasonable opposition voice who, while having different priorities, is not ghoulish and vile in the way he talks about Kirk's death.

The Reality Behind the Celebration

Kolvet makes it clear that it wasn't all the left that celebrated Kirk's murder—absolutely not. He estimates maybe it was a quarter. It was so disgusting and vile for many to witness the examples that conservatives made it loud on social media. These people needed to be faced with accountability, and that's exactly what they should be faced with. There may be a perception issue because of how much attention was given to these vile reactions.

Kolvet references a YouGov Economist poll conducted September 13-15, just days after Kirk was assassinated. In the 18 to 39-year-old cohort among those self-described as progressive, 30% believe that political violence is justified to settle political scores. That is not a country anyone wants to live in.

What's driving this, Kolvet believes, is algorithms online taking clips of Charlie Kirk out of context, cherry-picking them, feeding them through the algorithm. If you're only living in that echo chamber, you think Kirk is a vile racist who probably had it coming. You can see why someone would make that logical conclusion. That is obviously not a country Kolvet wants to live in.

Debunking the Lies

The truth is different. Turning Point went through a whole episode debunking things Kirk said about MLK, the Civil Rights Act, Black pilots, and other topics. There was a logical explanation for all of that. The movement has to look at social media and ask what platforms are pumping into the brains of Gen Z on TikTok, Instagram, and Discord. Maybe there's a better way this can be done without censoring people or sacrificing First Amendment rights.

Kolvet says he can recognize people with algorithm brain—those who spend all their time on platforms like Bluesky. It's really scary when you meet people like that. However, when he goes out in real life and meets people on the streets, he still believes fundamentally in the goodness of the American people. If conservatives lose that faith, if they black-pill or become doomers, that's not a recipe for success. The conservative team loves America—that's what Kolvet loves about the team. But the team is also prone to a little bit of nihilism and black-pilling, and that must be fought. Giving into that is why people don't show up for elections and why conservatives are hurt in off-cycle races.

Hope for the Future and Supporting JD Vance

The hope is that with knocking doors, messaging, and taking advantage of all of voting month, things will improve. Kolvet would love for it to be voting day with voter ID and paper ballots, getting rid of machines, but that can't seem to get done because people can't seem to reform their elections. If the filibuster needs to be nuked to do it, so be it, but this is the system conservatives have right now.

The hope is that when 2026 comes around, it's a little more high-profile midterms, and maybe conservatives will do better than people suspect. When 2028 comes, the hope is that it will be a crystallizing, focusing moment that will galvanize the large coalition that has been put together. Turning Point Action is pushing JD Vance, which Kolvet says is no secret. Kirk had been saying for years that they were going to get behind Vance. People acted like it was big news when Erika said from stage at AmericaFest that they're getting behind Vance, but Kirk had been saying this for years.

Kirk was very open about supporting Vance when he became the vice president nominee. Earlier in March of that year, he said something very publicly about it. The organization knows where it's going, and JD and Usha have been so supportive of Kirk—amazing people. The moral clarity, courage, and character of Vance that Kolvet has seen up close and personal is phenomenal. Kirk chose well, knew what he was doing, and the organization will continue on with that.

AmericaFest 2025: An Uplifting Experience

At AmericaFest 2025, there are many things visible throughout the event—"We are all Charlie Kirk" messaging, people coming down the escalator, freedom imagery, and the tent. It's somber vibes but also packed with people. Kolvet describes the event as an amazing success thus far, with one caveat: they're not at the end of it yet. As of the time of the interview, it has been an absolute success.

Kolvet came in kind of unsure, admitting he'll be honest—day one, he was kind of dreading it because this is the first AmericaFest without Kirk. This was Kirk's Super Bowl. There was a part of Kolvet that didn't even want to come if he's being honest, but he has a job to do, so he had to show up. As soon as he walked in the door, his spirits lifted. He was instantly encouraged. Amazing patriotic people from all over the country came up to shake his hand, encourage the team, and say they're behind them 100%.

You realize so much of the toxicity on social media is not real. So much of the doomer attitude on social media is not real. Real-life events are critically important for conservatives to experience firsthand because you realize how much the movement has going for it, how wonderful the people are, how kind they are, and how much love they have for each other, for their community, and for this country.

There have been some spicy things said from stage, which Kolvet loves and embraces. This stuff has to be hashed out. If it's not said out loud, no one will know where everybody sits on these issues, and people aren't going to believe it anyway. Might as well be at AmericaFest. That's what the event was built for all those years ago—to be a convening place where people could express all the different ideas of all the different factions within this big tent coalition.

The Left's Accountability for Political Violence

When asked whether the left has been held sufficiently accountable for the assassination of Kirk and the attempt on Donald Trump, Kolvet completely believes they have not been held accountable enough. This goes for media figures—whole networks should lose their broadcast licenses, and certain hosts certainly should probably not have a job anymore.

What Kolvet found most appalling was the Jimmy Kimmel versus Kolvet saga. His perspective was very simple: here's a guy with a major platform on a taxpayer-supported network that has a broadcasting license, and he's peddling a lie that Kirk's assassin was from the right, from MAGA—a complete lie. Listening to what the assassin's parents say about him reveals the truth.

What that sends as a message to the country is that you can lie, you can shoot somebody, you can make a political hit on somebody and kill them, and then the media apparatus is going to come in behind you and sweep it under the rug. They're going to make it appear as if it was okay and that Kirk had it coming. What a disgusting, absolutely vile thing to do and say. Kolvet made a big stink about it because the movement needs to make a big stink about it.

Media Responsibility and Dehumanizing Rhetoric

The Media Research Center came out with a poll showing that only 25% of people know that Kirk's assassin was a leftist. That's not okay. When you see polling showing so many young progressives think political violence is okay, you have to ask where that's coming from. It's social media. It's the way left-wingers talk about right-wingers—they dehumanize, call them Nazis, call them fascists. That stuff needs to be made taboo again. It needs to be completely ostracized from polite society.

Kolvet isn't saying anyone needs to be censored. What he's saying is they need to have a comeuppance. People need to challenge it. Maybe there does need to be some political, some financial, and when appropriate, certainly criminal consequences for that. There is a very sick virus going around the political left that is spreading this hyperbole and justifying violence. You see it on major TV networks where it's just okay to call President Trump a fascist, a tyrant, and a white supremacist all the time. They do the same thing with Stephen Miller. That's not okay. They did the same thing with Kirk.

That is not okay because Kirk was a decent, wonderful, generous human being who loved Jesus, gave his whole life for this country and to his family, and lifted up the best values. Everybody with a brain and two eyes and two ears understands that in retrospect. They see clearly what a good man he was. For these people to go around peddling lies and smears against Kirk should come with real consequences.

Doing It Within Conservative Values

These consequences have to be enacted in a way that fits within conservative values. The movement isn't just going to do what the left does and cancel people or tell them they can't have a social media account unless they're inciting real violence. That's a standard in the country—if you're inciting violence, you should be held accountable. Conservatives do it within their values.

Make political assassinations taboo again. Is that too much to ask? Kolvet thinks the decent men and women of America all know that. He would be excited for the Democrats to finally figure that out as well.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!