Up Next
Michael Knowles Honors Charlie Kirk's Peacemaking Legacy and Calls for Conservative Unity at AmericaFest
20:47
Isabel Brown Honors Charlie Kirk's Legacy at AmericaFest With Andrew Kolvet and Mikey McCoy
1:09:17
Nicki Minaj at AmericaFest Defends Christians, President Trump, and the Right to Think Freely
32:04
Andrew Kolvet on Charlie Kirk's Legacy as Coalition Builder and the Conservative Movement's Path Forward
Andrew Kolvet reflects on Charlie Kirk's ability to unite diverse voices within the conservative movement and addresses the internal debates that have emerged since his assassination. Speaking at AmericaFest 2025, Kolvet discusses why these political fights were inevitable, how conservatives can navigate disagreements without turning on each other, and why the movement must hold the left accountable for dehumanizing rhetoric. He also reveals Turning Point Action's commitment to supporting JD Vance and explains why real-life events like AmericaFest are essential antidotes to the toxicity of social media. Kolvet emphasizes that while conservatives are independent-minded free thinkers prone to rowdy debate, they must balance that with political effectiveness and remember what Charlie stood for: more free speech, more debate, and building the biggest winning coalition possible.
Charlie Kirk's Role as Coalition Builder
Andrew Kolvet addresses the observation that Charlie Kirk served as a unifying force within the conservative movement, someone who brought together voices on the right that didn't always agree with each other. Since Kirk's assassination, there has been visible fighting within the movement, leading many to wonder about the future of conservative unity.
Kolvet confirms this observation is directionally true but provides important context. As someone who had private conversations with Kirk for years, Kolvet explains they could see these debates coming long before the assassination occurred. The conversations about Israel, foreign policy, how and when to use the United States military, and immigration were inevitable. Kirk's assassination may have accelerated these debates, but it didn't create them.
In some ways, Kolvet welcomes these debates because the fissures and dividing lines were visible from far away to anyone paying attention. He believes that by 2026, when Democrat socialists are on the ticket representing people who fundamentally hate America and disagree with the founding story, a new coalition will emerge. It may not look exactly like Trump's winning coalition in 2024, but it will probably look mostly the same. Every couple of years, conservatives have to rebuild coalitions, and that's simply the nature of politics.
Embracing Debate Without Fear
For conservatives, Kolvet argues, the key is not being afraid of the fight or the debate. The movement should welcome it rather than try to cancel people. By letting the chips fall where they may, conservatives will find good answers. If the movement really embraces debate, it will find a consensus that people can actually buy into.
Despite the horror of Kirk's assassination, there was a brief moment of clarity where the conservative movement was united and ready to join forces and close ranks against the left. However, the movement has seemed distracted since then, with some fallout and internal arguments. Kolvet is asked why conservatives seem so easily distracted from focusing on the left, constantly losing sight of that goal and turning on each other to argue about trivial matters.
Kolvet describes this as a multivariant analysis with multiple contributing reasons. One reason is the commentator, YouTube, and podcast culture that has emerged. While this was a good and important development needed to push back against establishment legacy media, even independent voices with their own channels are still tempted to go down certain paths or react to certain things. The incentive structure is such that these voices are not necessarily incentivized to call out truth when needed or do much more than get along, ignore issues, and keep the status quo. This can ultimately breed weeds in the garden.
Free Speech and Prudent Coalition Building
Kolvet emphasizes that Charlie Kirk was all about more free speech, more debate, and trying to expand the tent as large and as big as possible to form a winning coalition. It's about finding balance. When you have to live in tension between competing right answers, you have to learn to live in that tension and use prudence. Kirk was all about using prudence—not everyone is invited to AmericaFest, but the goal is to make it as big as feasible.
If there's going to be a debate or a row within the conservative movement, this is a good time to have it. In December, with midterms coming up in 2026 and the presidential election in 2028, the movement needs to get it together at some point. These debates need to happen so the movement can move on to the extent possible.
As for why it's happening, Kolvet explains that conservatives are just rowdy people, independent-minded individuals. They're not like the left, which is collectivist and tends to take marching orders from the top like the Borg, marching in one direction. Conservatives have to hash things out. People need to keep telling themselves they don't need to be afraid—embrace it, enjoy existing within this tension, and learn that this is actually what politics is all about.
Learning from the Left's Unity While Playing to Conservative Strengths
When asked whether conservatives can take notes from the left—specifically regarding how Democrats would react if a prominent left-wing figure were assassinated on camera while Democrats were in control—Kolvet acknowledges the frustration. The left would start committees over far less, initiate such a crackdown, and demonstrate their hive mind collectivism where everyone gets on board.
Kolvet admits there are political points where he is jealous of the left and their ability to operate as a unified collective with no infighting or voting against the establishment. There's utility in that politically. However, conservatives have to play with the cards they're dealt. Those cards include a bunch of independent-minded free thinkers who make up the coalition. The ideas are better, and the quality of the people is better, but this coalition is also prone to some excesses—conspiratorial thinking and rowdy infighting. You have to take the good with the bad.
Still, Kolvet says he'll take the conservative side any day because their ideas actually work and they can get things done for the country that are important. Sometimes he is jealous of the left, but there comes a point where the movement has to distinguish between ideological debate and political debate. When operating within the realm of politics, conservatives need to buckle up, swallow their pride, and get political actions done.
Lawmakers Need to Stop Being Influencers
Kolvet shares a point he learned from Mike Cernovich: conservatives want their lawmakers to stop being influencers. If you're a lawmaker, do congressional things, do political things—go behind doors, even if it's a smoke-filled back room. Just get it right. Get the vote right, whip the votes, and make sure to do what the side needs done. Stop trying to be influencers or social media provocateurs. Do what you were elected to do.
The movement needs to put lawmakers back in their proper boxes because when roles intermingle, it gets messier. This isn't to say elected officials can't have a public profile—that's great, and they should. But everyone should remember what role they play in this space so they can be most effective.
The Left's Grotesque Celebration and Political Violence
When Kirk was assassinated, the left reacted by celebrating—not all of the left, but it was a major mask-off moment. People in healthcare, public service, and schools, including educators teaching children, displayed grotesque reactions. Even recently, a Target employee was harassed in the store, and Kirk's supporters are harassed seemingly on a daily basis. The question arises: How do you have political discourse with people who would celebrate if you were murdered over your political views?
Kolvet's answer is simple: you really can't. It's a sad truth. Kirk was a big believer that America was meant for a Christian people, and when you have a whole political movement that has essentially kicked God out of its political policies and the planks of its campaign and apparatus, that movement is going to corrupt itself. You get a value system that is turned upside down, and that's essentially what exists on the American left right now.
But you have to keep working on it and keep finding sane voices. Kolvet gives an example: he does not like the way John Fetterman votes, but he gives credit where it's due. Fetterman has emerged as a reasonable opposition voice who, while having different priorities, is not ghoulish and vile in the way he talks about Kirk's death.
The Reality Behind the Celebration
Kolvet makes it clear that it wasn't all the left that celebrated Kirk's murder—absolutely not. He estimates maybe it was a quarter. It was so disgusting and vile for many to witness the examples that conservatives made it loud on social media. These people needed to be faced with accountability, and that's exactly what they should be faced with. There may be a perception issue because of how much attention was given to these vile reactions.
Kolvet references a YouGov Economist poll conducted September 13-15, just days after Kirk was assassinated. In the 18 to 39-year-old cohort among those self-described as progressive, 30% believe that political violence is justified to settle political scores. That is not a country anyone wants to live in.
What's driving this, Kolvet believes, is algorithms online taking clips of Charlie Kirk out of context, cherry-picking them, feeding them through the algorithm. If you're only living in that echo chamber, you think Kirk is a vile racist who probably had it coming. You can see why someone would make that logical conclusion. That is obviously not a country Kolvet wants to live in.
Debunking the Lies
The truth is different. Turning Point went through a whole episode debunking things Kirk said about MLK, the Civil Rights Act, Black pilots, and other topics. There was a logical explanation for all of that. The movement has to look at social media and ask what platforms are pumping into the brains of Gen Z on TikTok, Instagram, and Discord. Maybe there's a better way this can be done without censoring people or sacrificing First Amendment rights.
Kolvet says he can recognize people with algorithm brain—those who spend all their time on platforms like Bluesky. It's really scary when you meet people like that. However, when he goes out in real life and meets people on the streets, he still believes fundamentally in the goodness of the American people. If conservatives lose that faith, if they black-pill or become doomers, that's not a recipe for success. The conservative team loves America—that's what Kolvet loves about the team. But the team is also prone to a little bit of nihilism and black-pilling, and that must be fought. Giving into that is why people don't show up for elections and why conservatives are hurt in off-cycle races.
Hope for the Future and Supporting JD Vance
The hope is that with knocking doors, messaging, and taking advantage of all of voting month, things will improve. Kolvet would love for it to be voting day with voter ID and paper ballots, getting rid of machines, but that can't seem to get done because people can't seem to reform their elections. If the filibuster needs to be nuked to do it, so be it, but this is the system conservatives have right now.
The hope is that when 2026 comes around, it's a little more high-profile midterms, and maybe conservatives will do better than people suspect. When 2028 comes, the hope is that it will be a crystallizing, focusing moment that will galvanize the large coalition that has been put together. Turning Point Action is pushing JD Vance, which Kolvet says is no secret. Kirk had been saying for years that they were going to get behind Vance. People acted like it was big news when Erika said from stage at AmericaFest that they're getting behind Vance, but Kirk had been saying this for years.
Kirk was very open about supporting Vance when he became the vice president nominee. Earlier in March of that year, he said something very publicly about it. The organization knows where it's going, and JD and Usha have been so supportive of Kirk—amazing people. The moral clarity, courage, and character of Vance that Kolvet has seen up close and personal is phenomenal. Kirk chose well, knew what he was doing, and the organization will continue on with that.
AmericaFest 2025: An Uplifting Experience
At AmericaFest 2025, there are many things visible throughout the event—"We are all Charlie Kirk" messaging, people coming down the escalator, freedom imagery, and the tent. It's somber vibes but also packed with people. Kolvet describes the event as an amazing success thus far, with one caveat: they're not at the end of it yet. As of the time of the interview, it has been an absolute success.
Kolvet came in kind of unsure, admitting he'll be honest—day one, he was kind of dreading it because this is the first AmericaFest without Kirk. This was Kirk's Super Bowl. There was a part of Kolvet that didn't even want to come if he's being honest, but he has a job to do, so he had to show up. As soon as he walked in the door, his spirits lifted. He was instantly encouraged. Amazing patriotic people from all over the country came up to shake his hand, encourage the team, and say they're behind them 100%.
You realize so much of the toxicity on social media is not real. So much of the doomer attitude on social media is not real. Real-life events are critically important for conservatives to experience firsthand because you realize how much the movement has going for it, how wonderful the people are, how kind they are, and how much love they have for each other, for their community, and for this country.
There have been some spicy things said from stage, which Kolvet loves and embraces. This stuff has to be hashed out. If it's not said out loud, no one will know where everybody sits on these issues, and people aren't going to believe it anyway. Might as well be at AmericaFest. That's what the event was built for all those years ago—to be a convening place where people could express all the different ideas of all the different factions within this big tent coalition.
The Left's Accountability for Political Violence
When asked whether the left has been held sufficiently accountable for the assassination of Kirk and the attempt on Donald Trump, Kolvet completely believes they have not been held accountable enough. This goes for media figures—whole networks should lose their broadcast licenses, and certain hosts certainly should probably not have a job anymore.
What Kolvet found most appalling was the Jimmy Kimmel versus Kolvet saga. His perspective was very simple: here's a guy with a major platform on a taxpayer-supported network that has a broadcasting license, and he's peddling a lie that Kirk's assassin was from the right, from MAGA—a complete lie. Listening to what the assassin's parents say about him reveals the truth.
What that sends as a message to the country is that you can lie, you can shoot somebody, you can make a political hit on somebody and kill them, and then the media apparatus is going to come in behind you and sweep it under the rug. They're going to make it appear as if it was okay and that Kirk had it coming. What a disgusting, absolutely vile thing to do and say. Kolvet made a big stink about it because the movement needs to make a big stink about it.
Media Responsibility and Dehumanizing Rhetoric
The Media Research Center came out with a poll showing that only 25% of people know that Kirk's assassin was a leftist. That's not okay. When you see polling showing so many young progressives think political violence is okay, you have to ask where that's coming from. It's social media. It's the way left-wingers talk about right-wingers—they dehumanize, call them Nazis, call them fascists. That stuff needs to be made taboo again. It needs to be completely ostracized from polite society.
Kolvet isn't saying anyone needs to be censored. What he's saying is they need to have a comeuppance. People need to challenge it. Maybe there does need to be some political, some financial, and when appropriate, certainly criminal consequences for that. There is a very sick virus going around the political left that is spreading this hyperbole and justifying violence. You see it on major TV networks where it's just okay to call President Trump a fascist, a tyrant, and a white supremacist all the time. They do the same thing with Stephen Miller. That's not okay. They did the same thing with Kirk.
That is not okay because Kirk was a decent, wonderful, generous human being who loved Jesus, gave his whole life for this country and to his family, and lifted up the best values. Everybody with a brain and two eyes and two ears understands that in retrospect. They see clearly what a good man he was. For these people to go around peddling lies and smears against Kirk should come with real consequences.
Doing It Within Conservative Values
These consequences have to be enacted in a way that fits within conservative values. The movement isn't just going to do what the left does and cancel people or tell them they can't have a social media account unless they're inciting real violence. That's a standard in the country—if you're inciting violence, you should be held accountable. Conservatives do it within their values.
Make political assassinations taboo again. Is that too much to ask? Kolvet thinks the decent men and women of America all know that. He would be excited for the Democrats to finally figure that out as well.
Video Transcript
Charlie has always been a coalition
builder. He's been able to bring voices
together on the right that maybe they
don't always agree with each other. And
now we see with him gone, there's been a
lot of seems to be like a lot of
fighting within the movement. What's
your reaction to that?
>> You know, a lot of people have have made
the the observation that they think, you
know, Charlie was um sort of holding
back some of these fights and it was
keeping them from happening or or
otherwise holding the coalition
together. And I I definitely think that
that's directionally true, but as
somebody that was having these
conversations with Charlie in private, I
mean, we could see this stuff coming for
years. And I think it's probably more
true to say that he when Charlie was
assassinated maybe accelerated some of
these debates,
but they were, I think, inevitable,
right? the conversation about Israel,
the conversation about foreign policy in
general, how and when we use the United
States military, uh immigration,
uh these were things that were going to
happen. And so, in some ways,
I'm glad we're having them because we
could all if you were inside of this,
you could see these these fissures and
these dividing lines coming a mile away.
I think eventually 2026 when you have
Democrat socialists on the ticket, when
you have people that fundamentally hate
America, that disagree with the founding
story and and how we got here, I think
there's going to be a new coalition that
emerges. It may not look exactly like
Trump's winning coalition in 2024. It'll
probably look mostly the same, but
listen, every couple years, we have to
rebuild coalitions. And so I think that
for conservatives the key has to be
don't be afraid of the fight. Don't be
afraid of the debate. Welcome it. Don't
try and cancel people. And
let the chips fall where they may and
we'll find some good answers. We're
going to if we really embrace the
debate, we're going to find a consensus
that people actually can buy into.
>> Mhm. So as horrible as that day was,
there was this I felt like there was
this brief moment of clarity where the
right was the the movement, the
conservative movement was united for
this moment and ready to join forces and
close ranks against the left. We seem to
be to be distracted since then. There's
been some fallout there. How do we get
back on track? Is it a phase? Like why
do conservatives seem to be so easily
distracted from focusing on the left? we
are constantly
losing sight of that and kind of turning
on each other arguing about trivial
matters.
Yeah, I think it's a it's kind of what
do you say it's a multivariant analysis
actually there's a there's contributing
reasons why one of one of the reasons
why is that you know we have this
commentator YouTube podcast culture that
has emerged and it was a good thing it
was important we needed that to push
back against the establishment legacy
media but even when you have independent
voices that have their own independent
channels they're still going to be
tempted to go down certain paths or
react to certain things. Uh and and I'm
talking I I'm talking across the board.
I'm not pointing this at one person in
particular, but the incentive structure
is such that we are not necessarily
incentivized to call out, you know,
truth when we need to. We're not
necessarily incentivized to um do much
more than sort of get along, ignore,
keep keep status quo. And that can
ultimately breed a lot of weeds in the
garden, right? And I think every so
often you need to come to these
crossroads where let's have the debate.
Again, totally Charlie Kirk was all
about more free speech. He was all about
more debate. He was all about trying to
expand the tent as large and as big as
we could uh to to form a winning
coalition. So again, it's a balance. And
when you have a balance, when you have
to live in tension between two sort of
wrong answers, two sort of right
answers, you just have to you have to
learn to live in that tension and use
prudence. And Charlie was all about
using prudence, right? It's not that
everybody's invited to this to the to
Afest, but we try and make it as big as
as feasible, right? And I think, you
know, if you're going to have a debate,
if you're going to have sort of a row
within the conservative movement, uh
this is a good time to have it. This is
a uh we're in we're in December, you
know, we've got midterms coming up in
2026 and obviously the presidential in
2028. So, we got to get it together at
some point. we have to sort of have some
of these debates and move on to the
extent we can. And then like why is it
happening? Well, conservatives are just
a rowdy people. We're an
independent-minded people. We're not
like the left that is high-minded and we
tend to we tend to just sort of take our
marching orders for the top like like
the Borg and and march in one direction.
Like we're going to have to hash this
out. And um I just think people need to
continue telling continue telling
themselves you don't need to be afraid.
Embrace it.
enjoy existing within this within this
tension and learn that that's actually
what politics is all about.
>> Do you think that in some cases we can
take some
some notes from the left? And what I
mean by that is if a prominent left-wing
figure were to be assassinated on camera
when Democrats were in control. We just
we know what they we know how they would
react. They've started committees over
far less. Are you frustrated at all
about Republicans maybe we don't have
the same kind of reaction when it
happens with us that the you know the
left would be reacting they would
initiate such a crackdown they would
>> yeah I mean listen
>> there is a there are certainly political
points where I am jealous of the left
and their their hive mind their
collectivism where they just all get on
board and there's no no people even
voting against the uh the establishment
or you know listen there there's utility
in that politically
But again, we have to play with the the
cards we're dealt. And the cards were
dealt as conservatives. You have a bunch
of really independent-minded free
thinkers that make up our coalition. The
ideas are better. The the quality of the
people, I think, is better, but it also
is prone to some excesses. It's prone to
some conspiratorial thinking. It's prone
to um rowdy infighting. I mean, you just
have to sort of take the good with the
bad.
But, you know, I'll take our side any
days because our our ideas actually work
and we we can actually get things done
for the country that are are important
to get done. But, yeah, sometimes I am a
little jealous of the left and I think
there is comes a point where we have to
say, hey, there there's an ideological
debate we can have and then there's a
political debate we can have. And when
we're operating within the realm of
politics, we need to like buckle up. Uh,
we need to swallow our pride and get
political actions done. Last thing I'll
say, and I'm stealing this from Mike
Cernovich. Actually, a conversation I
had with him this morning, is that
listen, we want our lawmakers to stop
being influencers. If you're a lawmaker,
do congressional things. Do political
things like go behind doors. I don't
care if it's a smoke filled back room.
Just get it right. Get the vote right.
Whip the votes and make sure we do do
what our our side needs to be done. Stop
trying to be influencers. Stop trying to
be social media uh you know,
provocators. Like, do what you need to
do, what we elected you to do. And I
think we need to as a movement put them
back in their proper boxes now because
when they intermingle it gets it gets,
you know, it it gets messier. And I and
it's not to say you don't have to have a
public profile if you're an elected
official. That's great. Like you should
do that. But let's remember what role we
all play in this in this space so we can
be most effective.
>> Obviously, we all saw when Charlie was
assassinated, the left reacted by
celebrating. Um,
>> not all of the left, but
>> not not all the left, but it was it was
a major maskoff moment where you saw
people in healthcare, people that work
in public service,
>> schools,
>> school, you know, educators, educating
people's children. We saw some very
grotesque reactions. And even just the
other day, I mean, we saw the Target
employee harassed in the store. His
supporters are harassed seems to be on a
daily basis. How do you have political
discourse with people who would
celebrate if you were murdered over your
political?
>> I mean, yeah. I mean, you really can't.
I mean is the answer the tr it's a sad
truth but you know Charlie was a big
believer that America was meant for a
Christian people and when you have a
whole political movement that's
essentially kicked God out of its
political policies and you know the
planks of its campaign and its apparatus
like it's not ultimately that is going
to corrupt itself and you're going to
get a value system that is turned upside
down and that's essentially what we've
got on the American left right now
>> but
You have to keep working on it. You have
to keep finding sane voices. I'll give
you an example. I do not like the way
this man votes, but I will give him
credit where it's due, and that is John
Federman. John Federman has emerged as a
reasonable opposition voice that yeah,
we have different priorities, but at
least he's not ghoulish and vile in the
way that he talks about Charlie's death.
And I just want to make it clear, it
wasn't all
the left that celebrated Charlie's
murder. Absolutely not. I I think it was
so disgusting and vile for for many of
us to witness the examples of it.
>> Yeah, maybe it's a quarter. Uh but it
was so disgusting and vile for us to
witness it that we made much of it on
social media. We made it loud because we
wanted these people to to be, you know,
faced with accountability and that
exactly what they should be faced with.
So I I I I think there's a perception
issue with that. But you know, you saw
that Yuggov economist poll that came
out, I think in the September 13 through
15, just a few days after Charlie was
assassinated. And if you were in that 18
to 39year-old cohort, and you were
self-described as progressive, 30% of
that cohort believes that political
violence is justified to settle
political scores. That is not a country
that any of us want to live in. And what
really I believe is driving that is
algorithms online, taking clips of
Charlie, for example, out of context,
cherrypicking them, feeding them through
the algorithm, and then if you are only,
you know, living in that echo chamber,
you think Charlie's a vile racist who
probably had it coming. You know, it's I
could see why you would make that
logical conclusion. And so, um, that is
obviously not a country I want to live
in. The truth is, and we went through a
whole episode of the Charlie Kirk
debunking, you know, things he said
about MLK, about the Civil Rights Act,
about Black Pilots, whatever it was. And
there was a logical explanation for all
of that. And so, we have to we have to
look at social media and be like, what
are you pumping into the brains,
especially Gen Z on Tik Tok and
Instagram, and, you know, let's look at
Discord there? Maybe there's a better
way that this can be done and without
censoring people, without uh
sacrificing, you know, first amendment
rights. I I just you know I know that
because it's like I can see these people
when they have algorithm brain where all
they do is spend time on blue sky and
they like you know I mean it's it's
really scary when when you meet people
like that. I would also say one last
thing when I go out in real real life
and meet people on the streets like the
I I still believe fundamentally in the
goodness of the people of America and if
we lose that faith if we black pill if
we doomer on it it's like that's not
that's not a recipe for success for our
our team. Our team loves America. I love
that about our team. We love America by
and large. But our team is also prone to
a little bit of nihilism and black
pilling and we have to fight that
because if we do if we if we give into
that, that's why we don't show up for
elections. That's why we're hard in
offcycle races, right? So the hope is
with knocking doors, messaging, you take
advantage of all voting month. I would I
would love for it to be voting day,
voter ID, piece of paper, get rid of the
the machines, but you know, we can't
seem to get that done cuz we can't seem
to get people to to uh reform their
elections. And you know, if we have to
nuke the filibuster to do it, but hey,
this is the system we've got right now.
Um you the hope is that when 2026 comes
around, it's a little bit more
high-profile midterms, maybe we'll do
better than people suspect. we get to
2028, the hope is that that will be a a
crystallizing focusing moment that will
galvanize this large coalition that we
put together.
>> And Turning Point Action is um pushing
Vance.
>> Yeah. I mean, I don't think that's uh
any secret. Charlie was, you know, it's
funny. I've seen cuz Erica said
something from stage here at Amfest that
Yeah, we're getting behind JD Vance. I
mean, and they acted like it was big
news. Charlie was saying this for years.
I mean, he really was. He was he he had
been saying um that we're going to get
behind JD Vance if JD Vance is the you
know whatever he wants to do politically
and then of course when uh the vice
president became the vice president or
the nominee
um he was very open about that you know
he was telling people privately and then
I remember even um earlier this must
have been March of this year he said
something publicly very publicly so yeah
we we as an organization know where
we're going and JD and Usha have been so
supportive of Charlie. Just amazing
amazing people. And the the moral
clarity and the the the courage and the
character of JD Vance, I've seen it up
close and personal in ways that um let
me just attest and for those who have it
that the man is just phenomenal. He
really is. So, uh Charlie chose well. He
he knew what he was doing and the
organization is going to continue on
with that.
>> We're at America Fest 2025. I see, you
know, I see a lot of things like, you
know, we are all Charlie Kerr coming
down the escalator, the freedom, the
tent over there. Um, it's kind of it's
like somber vibes, but it's also there's
so many people here. Um, what is your
just what is your read on how this event
is going? How has it been so far?
>> I I think this event has been an amazing
success thus far. Um, now granted, one
caveat, we're not at the end of it. So,
uh, you know,
>> uh, when you see this, maybe something
else will have some other news will have
happened, but yeah,
>> as of right now, I mean, it's been an
absolute success. And yeah, I came in
kind of unsure. I'll be honest with you.
Like day one, I was kind of dreading it
cuz the first
>> Amfest without Charlie, this is his
Super Bowl. Uh, I I there was a part of
me that didn't even want to come if I'm
being honest. But, you know, I I've got
a job to do, so I got to show up. And as
soon as I walked in the door, it was
like my spirits lifted. I was instantly
encouraged. I had all these amazing
patriotic people from all over the
country come up and want to shake my
hand and encourage us and say that, you
know, they're behind us 100%. And you
just realize so much of the toxicity on
social media is not real. So much of the
the the doomer attitude on social media
is not real. and you come in you and I
think in real life events are so
critically important for conservatives
to experience firsthand because you
realize just like how much we have going
for us how wonderful the people are, how
kind the people are, how how much love
they have for each other, for their
community, for this country. Um, so I
would recommend that and I would just so
I would just say, yeah, there's been
some spicy things said from stage. I
love it. I embrace it. Like we got to
hash this stuff out and if we don't say
it out loud, we're not going to know
where everybody sits on this stuff and
people aren't going to believe it
anyway. So, we got to do this. Might as
well be at Afest. And that's kind of
what we built this thing for uh all
those years ago was to be have this be a
convening place where people could
express all the different uh ideas of
all the different factions within this
big tent coalition we've got.
>> Has the left not been held sufficiently
accountable for the assassination of
Charlie Kirk and the attempt on Donald
Trump?
>> Yeah, I mean I I completely believe that
they have not been held accountable
enough for that. And that that's goes
for media figures. I mean, I don't know
if you know, whole networks should lose
their uh broadcast licenses. Uh certain
hosts certainly should probably not have
a job anymore. What I found
what I found most appalling, and it was
interesting, my mom kept sending me like
news clipping of like Kimmel versus
Kovette, you know, during uh when when
that whole saga was going on. My
perspective on it was very simple.
Here's a guy that has this major
platform on a taxpayerup supported, you
know, network that has a broadcasting
license and this guy is pedalling a lie
that the Charlie's assassin was of the
right was from MAGA, which is a complete
lie. Listen to what his parents say
about him. And what that sends a message
to the country is is that you can lie
about char. You can lie about or you can
shoot somebody. You can make a political
hit on somebody, kill them, and then the
media apparatus is going to come in
behind you and and sweep it under the
rug. They're going to make it appear as
if it was just okay and that Charlie had
it coming. What a disgusting, absolutely
vile thing to do and say. And so I made
a big stink about it because I think we
need to make a big stink about it. And
you know, MRC came out with that poll
that said only 25% of people know that
that uh Charlie's assassin was a
leftist. That's not okay. And when you
see the polling that so many young
progressives think that political
violence is okay, you got to ask
yourself where that where's that coming
from? It's it's social media. It's the
way left uh leftwingers talk about
right-wingers that we they dehumanize.
It calls Nazis, calls fascists. That
stuff needs to be made taboo again. That
stuff needs to be completely ostracized
from uh polite society. Candidly, I'm
not saying you need to censor anybody.
What I'm saying is they need to have a
comeuppance. People need to challenge
it. And yeah, maybe there does need to
be some some political some financial uh
and win appropriate. Certainly criminal
consequences for that. But yeah, there
is a very sick sick uh virus going
around the political left that is
spreading u this hyperbole and
justifying and you see it on major TV
networks where it's just okay to call
President Trump a fascist and a tyrant
and a white supremacist all the time.
They do the same thing with Steven
Miller. That's not okay. They did the
same thing with uh Charlie. That is not
okay because Charlie was a decent,
wonderful, generous human being that
loved Jesus, that gave his whole life
for this country and to his family and
lifted up the best values. And I think
everybody kind of like with a brain and
two eyes and two ears understands that
in retrospect. They see how they see
that clearly what what a good man he
was. And for these people to go around
pedalling lies uh and smears against
Charlie, that should come with real
consequences. Now, we have to do that in
a way that fits within our, you know,
with our values, right? We're not just
going to go, you know, do what the left
does and like cancel people and tell
them they can't have a social media
account unless they're inciting real
violence. I think that's a standard in
in our country that that certainly if
you're inciting violence, you should be
held accountable. So, we do it within
our values. Make political
assassinations taboo again. Is that too
much to ask? And I think I think the uh
the decent men and women of America all
know that. Uh I would be excited for the
Democrats to finally figure that out as
well.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.