[00:00] I had to do a quick follow-up to my last
[00:02] video because there was just so much
[00:03] more to cover and also I discovered some
[00:06] receipts that proved things on both
[00:08] sides of the argument. So, I want to
[00:10] talk about a few things today. I told
[00:12] you last time it seems that Erica Kirk
[00:14] might have lied during one of her
[00:16] interviews while trying to hypnotize us.
[00:19] Candace Owens got annoyed with Erica who
[00:21] implied Candace lied about Charlie
[00:23] confining in his friends that his life
[00:26] was in danger. She appeared on Jimmy
[00:28] Door and started dropping some TP USA
[00:30] names. I showed you a list of receipts
[00:33] last time produced by Project
[00:35] Constitution on X, which aimed to prove
[00:37] that Charlie was scared for his life and
[00:39] said it to people around him, which kind
[00:42] of makes Erica Kirk look like, well, it
[00:44] could seem like she lied. We'll go
[00:46] through this list and I will show you
[00:48] tweets, videos, some hearsay which might
[00:52] or might not prove things. Oh, and one
[00:54] more thing. In the last video, we talked
[00:56] a bit about Charlie and we were
[00:58] speculating whether he wrote his latest
[01:00] book himself, the book titled Stop in
[01:02] the Name of God about keeping Sabbath.
[01:04] Erica said he would throw his phone in
[01:06] his drawer and said Shabbat Shalom. And
[01:08] it would seem he would keep Jewish
[01:10] Sabbath. Well, I found an interesting
[01:12] video of Charlie talking about it. So,
[01:14] make sure to stay with me till the end.
[01:16] We will learn a lot of stuff today. So,
[01:18] one of the issues we are facing right
[01:20] now is that people are being guilted
[01:22] into not mentioning the fact that Erica
[01:24] seems to have lied during one of her
[01:26] interviews. We all understand that she's
[01:28] been through something tragic. However,
[01:31] to people who are not buying the
[01:32] official Tarl Robinson narrative because
[01:34] of a lot of things that just don't
[01:36] stick, it seems she looks shady. We also
[01:39] are not supposed to notice how creepy
[01:41] she's acting. I mean, the eyes.
[01:44] >> The eyes, Chico, they never lie. before
[01:47] tours. We said our prayer and [music] we
[01:50] asked the Lord to protect us and we
[01:52] asked the Lord that his will be done.
[01:55] That's what we did.
[02:10] No, we are not going to be making fun of
[02:12] Erica Kirk. Maybe a little bit, but
[02:14] that's cuz I'm Polish and we make fun of
[02:16] everything and everyone. Plus, I come
[02:17] from the old school times where jokes
[02:19] were actually allowed, even the
[02:21] offensive ones, and no one was going to
[02:23] jail for it. But that thing she does
[02:25] with her eyes caught my interest. People
[02:27] commented. I literally get chills.
[02:30] Something is very, very wrong here.
[02:32] Another one, her eyes after she said,
[02:34] "We said our prayer." And then someone
[02:38] says, "Kenneth Copelan vibes." So I got
[02:40] curious because hey it could be a
[02:42] medical condition, could be
[02:43] neurological, could be even just her
[02:45] response to a stressful situation. So I
[02:47] didn't want to be judgmental. So of
[02:49] course what did I do? I asked Chad GPT a
[02:52] general question. Okay, cuz Chad GPT
[02:55] knows everything. Not I know I know but
[02:57] I asked when a person tends to widen
[03:00] their eyes in regular intervals when
[03:02] speaking to someone let's say on camera,
[03:04] what does it mean? Is it a medical
[03:06] condition or a behavioral thing? I got
[03:08] an interesting answer. Of course, first
[03:11] option, stress anxiety response. Very
[03:13] common. When someone is under stress,
[03:15] their nervous system can trigger micro
[03:17] expressions that look unnatural. What
[03:19] this can look like? Sudden wide eye
[03:21] opening, eyebrows lifting sharply, eyes
[03:23] flashing open for a split second happens
[03:26] in repeating intervals. But then the
[03:28] second option is learned coached
[03:31] behavior, media or performance related.
[03:33] And because she's on camera, I tend to
[03:35] believe this one more. Yes, this is a
[03:37] real thing. Some people pick up
[03:38] expressive habits from media training.
[03:41] Overemphasize facial expressions to
[03:43] appear sincere, emphatic,
[03:46] present, emotionally engaged. And the
[03:50] third option, masking or over control,
[03:52] cognitive load. When someone is choosing
[03:54] words very carefully, suppressing
[03:56] emotion, trying not to say something, or
[03:59] maintaining a specific narrative, their
[04:02] face can leak tension in small
[04:04] repetitive ways. Huh.
[04:07] Well, it also could be a tick or eye
[04:10] dryness, but given the circumstances,
[04:12] I'd think it would be two or three.
[04:15] Okay, I went back to her old interviews
[04:17] and I couldn't find anything similar. I
[04:19] mean, she has this intense look, but
[04:21] nothing like that. She wasn't doing that
[04:23] before with her eyes. Maybe I missed it.
[04:25] If you guys find something like that
[04:26] from the past, let me know. But yes,
[04:28] since she probably received some
[04:30] training to appear in the med in the
[04:31] media, it could be it. She's being
[04:34] careful and is trying to appear
[04:36] believable. You know, God told us to do
[04:39] so.
[04:40] >> Your heart will open up to the Lord.
[04:43] >> Anyway, while she was doing it with her
[04:44] eyes, she said something that sparked a
[04:47] lot of chatter online. Let me remind
[04:49] you,
[04:49] >> but he was not messaging people the day
[04:52] before saying, "I'm going to be
[04:54] murdered. They're coming after me.
[04:56] Someone's going to kill me." He didn't
[04:58] he didn't say that. And I have his cell
[05:00] phone. Again, I will say that her
[05:03] demeanor demeanor really changed over
[05:05] time. You remember this woman that was
[05:08] all about forgiveness and faith and
[05:10] everything and now she's kind of like
[05:12] sarcastic like she he didn't say it. I
[05:15] didn't see I have his cell phone. So,
[05:17] it's kind of I don't know. There are
[05:19] stages to grief, right? I
[05:22] I'm not a I'm not an expert. I'm not a
[05:24] psychologist, not a psychiatrist. I just
[05:27] observe things. So, here's why it's a
[05:28] big deal, though. I assume she said it
[05:31] in response to Candace Owens who is like
[05:33] the face of Charlie Kirk Independent
[05:35] online sleuth's investigation. And now
[05:37] that she went on air and addressed
[05:39] Candice telling her to stop her
[05:41] investigation, we know that when she
[05:43] talks about conspiracy theorists, she
[05:45] means Candace. And Candace did say
[05:47] multiple times. She wasn't the only one,
[05:49] but who cares? She said that she knows
[05:51] that Charlie texted someone the day
[05:54] before his assassination something like
[05:56] they are going to. It's a hearsay. We
[05:58] never saw the text. We never saw it
[06:00] written to Candace. So, we either choose
[06:02] to believe her or not. So, then Erica
[06:06] goes, "Charlie was not messaging people
[06:09] the day before saying, "I'm going to be
[06:11] murdered or someone's going to kill me."
[06:14] He didn't say that, "And I have his cell
[06:15] phone." You can't just casually drop a
[06:18] bomb like this and move on with your
[06:19] life expecting for people not to
[06:21] cross-check this information. We know
[06:23] from multiple sources that Charlie did
[06:25] confine in his friends, in people around
[06:27] him that he was afraid for his life. I
[06:29] don't understand why this woman is
[06:31] acting so freaking shady. I understand
[06:33] that you are pissed that people are
[06:34] trying to pin the blame on your friends,
[06:36] but you can't possibly think that lying
[06:38] will help the situation. And we could
[06:40] argue here, maybe he didn't say it to
[06:43] anyone the day before. But come on, the
[06:46] answer then should be, I'm not sure if
[06:48] he said it to anybody the day before his
[06:50] assassination specifically, but I know
[06:52] that there were times he thought of he
[06:54] thought of it that it might happen to
[06:57] him. Bum, do I get a job? Can I lead
[07:00] their PR now? I don't want to. Honestly,
[07:03] I think her PR team went into cardiac
[07:05] arrest when she added this last
[07:06] sentence. I have his cell phone. I
[07:09] showed you clips in my last video when
[07:10] she specifically is reading off a
[07:12] teleprompter. So I think her and the
[07:15] team of lawyers are sitting and drafting
[07:17] her every word that she will say in
[07:19] public and as soon as she decided to
[07:22] freestyle a little bit, she says, "I
[07:24] have his phone and those texts didn't
[07:26] happen." That is a very specific denial.
[07:28] It's a claim that directly clashes with
[07:30] what multiple people are saying online.
[07:32] So, since in my last video I already
[07:34] listed the existing receipts of people
[07:36] claiming Charlie said it to them or to
[07:39] someone whatever that they know, today I
[07:42] want to look at those receipts and
[07:43] discuss them with you. And let me do a
[07:45] quick disclaimer here. Do not twist my
[07:47] words. I am not accusing Erica or anyone
[07:49] of plotting to assassinate anyone. I
[07:51] know as much as you guys. But see the
[07:54] difference between this side of the
[07:56] internet, the side I'm on, and the other
[07:58] side. Our side here has an open mind
[08:01] actually. Okay, we see that things don't
[08:04] stick, that something doesn't add up,
[08:05] and we start looking for different
[08:07] possibilities. If Tyler Robinson has a
[08:09] fair trial that will satisfy the most
[08:12] suspicious minds out there, and the guy
[08:14] is proven to be guilty, fine. It is what
[08:16] it is. If it turns out that it's not him
[08:18] or that he was a psy, fine, too. We just
[08:21] want the truth, and we need everyone to
[08:23] seek it. But the other side of the
[08:25] internet is like, Tyler Robinson could
[08:28] do it.
[08:31] I prefer to stay on this side of the
[08:33] internet. Okay, so back to what Erica
[08:35] said. He was not messaging people the
[08:37] day before saying, "I'm going to be
[08:39] murdered. They're coming after me.
[08:41] Someone's going to kill me." He didn't
[08:43] say that and I have his cell phone.
[08:45] Let's go through those receipts and we
[08:47] will base it on the list made by Project
[08:49] Constitution. So first claim Harrison
[08:52] Smith info info went public saying
[08:55] Charlie told him days before
[08:59] that he feared the little hutsand
[09:02] would take him out. Okay. So I found
[09:06] this uh tweet he posted in response to
[09:10] Grimaldis who's talking about Ian Carol.
[09:13] Yeah, it's a little bit confusing. So
[09:15] apparently Ian Carol reacted to the
[09:17] embarrassing clip of Charlie Kirk
[09:19] avoiding Nick Fuentes and calls him out
[09:22] for not debating Nick. And the quote is
[09:24] the mainstream avoidance of Nick Fuentes
[09:26] is a fear response. So then Harrison H.
[09:30] Smith said, "I'm not going to name
[09:32] names, but I was told by someone close
[09:34] to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks is
[09:36] will him if he turns against them."
[09:38] Well, there you go. So that's first. The
[09:41] second claim from Project Constitution
[09:44] is about Andrew Kvet, TPUSA insider,
[09:47] confirmed Charlie's texts about threats.
[09:51] So I think he means the group chat where
[09:54] Charlie said he has no choice but to
[09:56] abandon Pro Little Hutland cause. Andrew
[09:59] [snorts] Covent said that the texts were
[10:02] real, but Charlie was just upset and was
[10:04] venting. He also wanted to bring Candace
[10:06] Owens back. Charlie wanted to bring
[10:08] Candace Owens back, not Andrew. But we
[10:10] all know this story, so I won't get into
[10:11] too much detail. Can this be considered
[10:13] a receipt that Charlie said he was
[10:15] scared they were going to him? No, I
[10:18] wouldn't consider it valid. I think he
[10:20] was just making different business
[10:21] decisions. You know, I am taking it at
[10:23] face value, you guys. We are trying to
[10:25] be fair here. So, next one on the list,
[10:27] prank Turk went on record saying that
[10:30] Charlie told him directly that he knew
[10:33] they were going to take him out. Not
[10:35] who. We don't know who, but Turk said it
[10:38] was 6 months before he was assassinated.
[10:40] Take a listen.
[10:41] >> Four. And I see Charlie that same way
[10:44] because he knew this was dangerous. I
[10:45] mean, he knew this was this had grown
[10:48] dangerous beyond a point where I think
[10:49] the rest of us expected to be.
[10:51] >> You're right. In fact, about 6 months
[10:53] ago, something happened in the news
[10:55] where someone got someone prominent. I
[10:58] can't remember the exact situation, but
[11:00] somebody prominent got shot. And so I
[11:01] texted him. And I said I said, "Charlie,
[11:03] I I hope you've increased your security
[11:05] detail." And he said, "I have. I know
[11:08] they want me dead." Now, I don't know
[11:11] who I don't think he had a specific they
[11:13] in mind, Megan, but he knew that there
[11:17] was hostility. I mean, he got death
[11:18] threats all the time.
[11:19] >> You know what I just thought of? Every
[11:21] time I hear someone said, "Oh, Charlie
[11:24] told me that. Oh, they want to they want
[11:27] me dead. They want to take me out."
[11:28] Really nobody asked, "What do you mean
[11:31] they like who? What do you what do you
[11:33] mean? Who are they?" Nobody literally
[11:36] nobody out of all his friends and
[11:38] co-workers and employees and wife and
[11:41] best whoever from family. Nobody asked,
[11:44] "Who do you mean? Who are you afraid
[11:47] of?" I don't believe it because if
[11:48] someone came to me and said, "Oh, you
[11:50] know, I think they're going to kill me."
[11:52] I would be like, "Who? Who's going to
[11:53] kill you?" Right? Like it's like
[11:56] natural. It comes next. You don't just
[11:58] go, "Okay, you take care." Like, how
[12:02] does that work? And it still bothers me
[12:04] that Erica just said, "No, he didn't
[12:06] tell anyone they were going to kill him
[12:08] the day before when obviously there are
[12:10] people clearly stating that it has
[12:13] happened in the past. Maybe not the day
[12:15] before his assassination, but definitely
[12:18] this year." Okay, next one on the list
[12:20] is Frank Turk. again also read an email
[12:23] Charlie sent him weeks earlier saying
[12:26] the exact same thing and here things get
[12:29] a little bit weird. Listen to this.
[12:31] >> And he also knew the power and privilege
[12:33] of prayer. A month ago he he wrote me
[12:35] this. Please pray for me. I'm under the
[12:37] gun on something right now. Prayer is
[12:39] appreciated.
[12:40] >> Yeah, I don't know about this one
[12:41] because it is a saying you use when you
[12:43] are under pressure or feeling
[12:45] overwhelmed. It was one month before his
[12:47] assassination. And what I can add here
[12:49] is that Candace Owens did say that
[12:51] Charlie was under an insane amount of
[12:54] pressure from his investors at that
[12:55] time. The group chat messages confirm
[12:58] it. So, no, I wouldn't take it literally
[13:00] as a receipt that he was like they were
[13:02] going to. He didn't say that. He didn't
[13:05] say I'm under the gun. I'm like under a
[13:07] lot of pressure. Okay. Okay. Next one.
[13:10] Candace Owens showed the actual texts on
[13:12] her phone. Charlie saying his life was
[13:15] in danger. text messages
[13:17] they're talking about here are from way
[13:19] back in the day, maybe 2018, when
[13:21] Charlie said he always has nightmares
[13:24] and knows TP USA will be the death of
[13:26] him or something like that. And if that
[13:28] was going to happen, he wanted Candace
[13:29] to be his David, so to seek truth and
[13:32] justice. Here is the screenshot of the
[13:34] messages. I don't really remember exact
[13:36] content. Let's read it. Kanye, you are
[13:39] going to be the iron lady of America, he
[13:41] says to her. I see it so freaking
[13:43] clearly. I might be Moses though. I
[13:45] might not see this whole thing through.
[13:48] Lo, if that is the case, be my David.
[13:51] She goes, "Dude, you don't even realize
[13:53] your power yet." He says, "If I tell you
[13:55] the true prophecy, I know in my gut it's
[13:57] really sad, but I hope it's wrong." But
[14:00] let's get to the most recent revelation
[14:01] of Candace who went on Jimmy Dar and
[14:04] imagine that she appeared online via
[14:07] Zoom. Probably she didn't appear in
[14:09] person. Apparently, it is possible. Wow.
[14:12] Someone should let Charlie Kirk show
[14:14] guys know. Here is the namedropping
[14:16] portion of the show. Take a look.
[14:18] >> And I can tell you 1,000% that Andrew
[14:23] Kulvette told me the night before
[14:26] Charlie was murdered, that Charlie Kirk
[14:28] texted him and said, "They are going to
[14:30] kill me." Andrew Kovette is the person
[14:31] who received a text message from Charlie
[14:33] Kirk saying, "They're going to kill me."
[14:34] And I'm not getting that third party. I
[14:36] got that directly from Andrew Kob. He
[14:37] asked me to keep it off record and I
[14:39] would have kept it off record if Erica
[14:41] did not imply that I lied. Right? So I
[14:44] mean I'm not saying she is saying
[14:45] Candace is lying. I am saying that since
[14:47] I was the one who put it out there,
[14:49] she's implying that I'm that I'm lying
[14:51] and that that's not true. We have a
[14:53] scenario here where either Andrew
[14:55] Kovette has told an explicit lie or
[14:58] Erica Kirk is telling an explicit lie.
[15:00] It's not up for me to determine who. I
[15:02] didn't receive that text message. And I
[15:04] also was told by a person at Turning
[15:07] Point USA, who I'm not going to name
[15:08] because they are one of my sources, that
[15:10] Dan Flood received the same message. So
[15:13] there you go. I don't know. I I I
[15:15] believe that she has his phone. I also I
[15:18] maybe somebody deleted it, but I don't I
[15:20] don't know why Andrew Kovette, 48 hours
[15:23] after Charlie was dead, would lie to me.
[15:25] He did not sound like he was lying. Um
[15:27] he sounded very concerned about it. And
[15:29] I I specifically said like, "Who who is
[15:31] they?" like you know like he like he
[15:32] said they're going to kill me and he
[15:33] said I don't know I don't know who he
[15:34] was talking about and I thought it's
[15:35] kind of weird
[15:36] >> so let me get this straight she received
[15:38] that information from Andrew Kovet two
[15:41] days after assassination of Charlie Kirk
[15:44] and he said that he received the text
[15:47] message from Charlie the day before the
[15:49] assassination that Charlie thought they
[15:52] were going to him again why didn't ask
[15:56] like who is they why nobody asked did
[15:59] they already know was it like a thing.
[16:01] They They knew who he was talking about.
[16:04] I cannot wait for December 15th. This is
[16:08] my Super Bowl. This is Christmas before
[16:10] Christmas. We will be on Candace's
[16:13] stream and watch her dismantle
[16:16] everything the guys over at TP USA say.
[16:18] One thing about Candace Owens is that
[16:20] she admits when she was wrong, and she
[16:22] doesn't say things if she doesn't
[16:24] believe they were true. And apparently,
[16:26] audiences trust her, even PBD's viewers.
[16:29] Patrick BD David did a survey on X.
[16:31] Let's see how that went. Whose side are
[16:33] you on in the Turning Point USA versus
[16:36] Candace Owens web war? Well, 70% side
[16:39] with Candace Owens and only 30% Turning
[16:42] Point USA. In the words of Milo
[16:44] Yanopoulos, she's winning. Reminder, TP
[16:48] USA said they will address all claims
[16:50] Candice has made about them and
[16:52] Charlie's investigation and the day of
[16:53] his assassination. I cannot wait,
[16:57] especially now because Andrew Kovette
[16:59] and the other guy need to come forward.
[17:02] Did Charlie text them or not? And if he
[17:05] did, this will put Erica in a tough
[17:07] spot, looking very, very shady. If they
[17:09] deny it, we still have all those other
[17:12] claims of Charlie being afraid that
[17:13] someone was going to end his life. We
[17:15] are just missing that day before the
[17:18] assassination part. And if he truly did
[17:20] not text anyone the day before about
[17:23] being scared for his life, then yeah,
[17:25] Erica is not lying. However, she said it
[17:28] in a way as if it was a ridiculous idea
[17:31] of him ever saying that even when we
[17:33] know now that he mentioned it to his
[17:36] friend definitely to Frank Turk. So her
[17:38] answer really could have been different
[17:39] again something like I don't know about
[17:41] the text the day before but yes of
[17:43] course he was fearing for his life
[17:45] sometimes. it would be much more
[17:47] believable answer, much more organic.
[17:49] And of course, the part with her saying
[17:51] that she had his phone. Again, I'm
[17:53] calling on lawyers or policemen and
[17:55] women, whoever has knowledge of what
[17:57] happens with evidence like victim's cell
[17:59] phone because someone wrote on X uh and
[18:02] this is in the answer to uh Ian Carol.
[18:05] Hi, Ian. Criminal investigator here. If
[18:07] someone is murdered by an outside
[18:09] source, their body is brought to a
[18:11] medical examiner where an itemized list
[18:13] of their belongings is made. Each item
[18:15] on that list is scrutinized to see if
[18:17] it's needed in the investigation. If
[18:19] it's an item like a phone, a detailed
[18:21] reason is needed as well as a warrant to
[18:24] search the phone. Charlie's phone isn't
[18:26] relevant to the investigation. He's the
[18:28] victim. Therefore, it was turned over to
[18:30] his next of kin, his wife. If anyone's
[18:33] cell phone is under investigation, it's
[18:34] the POS who murdered him. As an
[18:36] investigator, I'll be tearing that phone
[18:39] apart to see who this guy was talking
[18:41] with before and after. Hope this clears
[18:44] things up. How do you know who's the guy
[18:46] though? How do you know? Like before you
[18:48] know, before you arrest, how do you
[18:50] know? How do you get to that point?
[18:52] Who's the guy? It doesn't make any sense
[18:54] to me what this guy is saying. How are
[18:56] victim victims devices not relevant?
[18:58] What if someone texted and threatened
[19:00] them? What if there are pictures taken
[19:02] that could lead to motive as well? What
[19:04] if there are phone calls, notes,
[19:06] calendar entries, emails that could help
[19:08] establish who did this to them? Am I
[19:10] crazy or am I missing something? I think
[19:12] if investigators are completely closed
[19:14] off and set on one storyline, then yeah,
[19:17] they don't care about any other
[19:19] evidence. But if it's a fair
[19:20] investigation and they are looking into
[19:22] different possibilities, explore
[19:24] different leads, then yes, cell phone of
[19:26] the victim will probably provide
[19:28] multiple clues where to start from.
[19:30] Please guys, let me know. Maybe you have
[19:33] experience with that. It would drive me
[19:34] crazy. So, the last thing I want to
[19:36] straighten up here today is the Shabbat
[19:38] Shalom and Charlie Kirk thing. The world
[19:40] watched this clip of Erica yesterday and
[19:42] we all were like, "Hm." Take a look.
[19:46] >> Karesa, Charlie, and Erica, thank you
[19:48] for saying yes and being obedient to
[19:50] what God has for you and it's really
[19:53] shaped my life and everyone else here. I
[19:56] would love to know your thoughts on
[19:58] Sabbath and how practically your family
[20:02] practices this and applies it. I will
[20:04] let him talk. But as the wife, I will
[20:08] say I have seen it transform. I'm I
[20:12] already I love my husband and he's
[20:14] amazing and an intentional father and
[20:16] husband, but him honoring the Sabbath, I
[20:19] have seen it transform him in a way that
[20:21] is so powerful that when he turns his
[20:24] phone off and it goes in that drawer and
[20:26] he and I know that it's, you know, he's
[20:29] all on for the family. There is no
[20:32] distractions and he finally gets to
[20:34] reset his brain. He finally gets to
[20:37] breathe. And as a wife, there is nothing
[20:40] more precious than my husband's sanity
[20:42] when it comes to the echo chamber and
[20:45] everything that he's dealing with in his
[20:46] world. So, I have seen it change him and
[20:49] impact our family. And one of the most
[20:50] >> I love how at the beginning she's like,
[20:52] I'll let him answer, but let me talk for
[20:55] two minutes straight first. He had to
[20:58] interrupt her. Cute. beautiful ways. But
[21:01] I want him to
[21:02] >> Well, thank you. And we're very serious
[21:04] Sabbathke keepers. Uh we this would be
[21:07] an exception because we're here with all
[21:08] of you, but we'll do it on Sunday. We
[21:10] actually take the traditional Jewish
[21:12] Sabbath. If you don't want to do that,
[21:13] I'm not here to debate you on it. It's
[21:14] fine. If you want to do it privately,
[21:15] I'll beat you. But that's a whole
[21:16] separate issue. But it doesn't it
[21:18] actually doesn't matter that much. What
[21:19] does matter is, I think, that to our own
[21:21] detriment and to our own failure, we as
[21:24] Christians have decided to cast away
[21:26] resting on one of the seven days. God
[21:28] rested after creation. That comes before
[21:30] the Hebrews. It comes even before the
[21:32] creation of the modern world and
[21:34] civilization as we know it. And so we
[21:36] honor the Sabbath. We're very serious
[21:37] about it. We get to spend more time with
[21:39] our family. We do no news. We do no
[21:41] work. And it says very very clearly in
[21:43] the scriptures. For six days you shall
[21:45] work and the seventh day you shall rest.
[21:47] If you are feeling overrun by society,
[21:49] you might be feeling depressed or
[21:51] anxious. Here's just one way that you
[21:53] might be able to improve. Turn your
[21:54] phone off for one day. No contact. No
[21:57] social media, no work. Your mental
[21:59] health will improve dramatically. You
[22:01] can you can hang out with friends. You
[22:03] can go for a walk, but don't work for
[22:05] one day. That is a day for worship. That
[22:07] is a day for the Lord. That is a day to
[22:09] go be with God. That is a day to read
[22:11] your Bible and be out of the busyiness
[22:13] and the hurry hurriedness and the the
[22:16] just the anger and the noise of this
[22:19] world. Go back to God's natural rhythm.
[22:21] And it's made our family much tighter
[22:23] knit. And I could be traveling for five
[22:26] or six days, but if I at least get one
[22:27] good Sabbath with my family, it charges
[22:30] us all back up. So, God bless you. Thank
[22:31] you so much. And Shabbat shalom tonight.
[22:34] >> Well, she was not lying. So, yeah, he
[22:38] did honor Jewish Sabbath. He was saying
[22:39] Shabbat shalom from time to time. It was
[22:42] in his vocabulary. So, Erica did not lie
[22:44] and didn't try to insert anything that
[22:46] wasn't part of their everyday life. I
[22:48] also want to say because we are all so
[22:51] invested in this story, let's try to
[22:53] remember that Charlie Kirk was also a
[22:55] normal guy. He wasn't Jesus. And if we
[22:57] want to have an open and fair
[22:59] investigation to his death, sometimes
[23:01] some dirty laundry will come out with
[23:03] it. Okay, I'm starting to be open to the
[23:06] possibility, especially after Milo
[23:08] Yanopoulos said on a podcast that it was
[23:10] Charlie who made up an awful rumor about
[23:13] him to end his career. Obviously, he
[23:15] can't now rebut it. He cannot speak for
[23:19] himself. So, I'll leave it at that. But
[23:21] I am open to the possibility that we
[23:23] might find out more things that we won't
[23:25] like about him. And it's okay. Doesn't
[23:28] make him a bad guy. Makes him a human.
[23:30] And it still matters to get justice for
[23:32] his awful death. So, stay level-headed.
[23:36] Don't follow one side blindly because
[23:38] that's the worst thing for the truth.
[23:39] But as usual, I want to know what you
[23:41] guys think. Do you think Erica said the
[23:43] truth about Charlie's text messages from
[23:45] the day before his tragic end, or she
[23:47] might have wanted to avoid revealing
[23:49] anything about it? Let me know in the
[23:51] comments. If you enjoyed this video,
[23:52] make sure to like and share it, and of
[23:54] course, subscribe to my channel, turn on
[23:56] the notifications to never miss another
[23:57] Daily Fredo episode. For even more
[23:59] content, follow me on Instagram and X
[24:02] Daily Fredo. That's all for today. Have
[24:04] a good one.
