Ballistics Evidence Raises NEW Questions in Kirk Assassination

[00:01] Ladies and gentlemen, we have been 247

[00:05] on this.

[00:07] I have been doing nothing but discussing

[00:09] this at levels and at speeds that I

[00:14] never thought possible. The world is

[00:17] insatiable

[00:19] when it comes to matters of this. I just

[00:22] got done with my dear friend Sean Atwood

[00:25] in the UK and they are absolutely beyond

[00:30] belief. They are losing their minds over

[00:34] this. Talked to a friend of mine in

[00:36] Moscow.

[00:37] Moscow, an American expat, and he said

[00:40] he could not believe that in Moscow,

[00:44] the number of teenagers who showed this

[00:48] sense of of of love for Charlie in

[00:54] Moscow, he said it could not believe

[00:57] what he was seeing. It blew his and

[01:00] their mind.

[01:03] And this is what we're seeing right now.

[01:04] This is something that is

[01:07] incredible. But today, ladies and

[01:09] gentlemen, what just got even more

[01:12] fascinating

[01:14] is new information, new testimony, new

[01:19] theories, supposition, conjecture, new

[01:23] thinking that dealt specifically with

[01:26] the idea of could there have been

[01:30] another

[01:33] shooter, another version of this

[01:37] rendition? position. Could there have

[01:39] been something other than what you were

[01:42] told existed? Okay, you understand what

[01:46] I'm saying? Let me try this again.

[01:50] I cannot tell you in anymore

[01:55] how important this is for you to to

[01:58] grasp. But let me see if I can tell you

[02:00] this.

[02:02] There is evidence now based upon experts

[02:05] as is usually the case usually the case

[02:09] experts who come forward and say you

[02:11] know what there's something about this

[02:13] which we want to bring to your attention

[02:16] there was one video I saw today of a

[02:18] marine sniper somebody trained as a

[02:22] marine sniper and he said that based

[02:26] upon the evidence and he went through it

[02:29] that this exit excuse me, that this

[02:32] wound, which was purportedly listed and

[02:36] described as an entrance wound, was in

[02:39] fact an exit wound.

[02:43] Think about what I just told you. What

[02:46] would you do if that were true?

[02:49] That it could be indeed an exit wound.

[02:54] If that's true,

[02:57] if that's true, that changes everything.

[03:01] Everything. Do you understand what I'm

[03:03] saying? If your evidence, if you as a

[03:05] juror are told that the that this Tyler

[03:08] Robinson shot from this way,

[03:11] but you have this is this is Lee Harvey

[03:14] Oswald. If you have a round coming

[03:16] behind him,

[03:20] this is exploding.

[03:23] Now, what happens is when you say this,

[03:25] people have a difficult time because

[03:26] they're asking, "What am I supposed to

[03:28] do with this information? What am I

[03:30] supposed to do with information that

[03:31] you're telling me is inconsistent with

[03:34] that which was provided to me? What do I

[03:36] do? What do I say? How do I how do I

[03:39] comply? How do I comport? How do I deal

[03:41] with this? What is it that I'm supposed

[03:44] to

[03:45] do regarding this regarding this? Are

[03:49] you saying that there was somebody else

[03:53] That's exactly what we're trying to say.

[03:56] How could that be? Well, did he did he

[03:59] have anything to do with this? I don't

[04:00] know. Did he have anything to do with

[04:03] this? We don't know. Was there somebody

[04:06] else covering for him? We don't know.

[04:10] And the question that you have to ask

[04:12] yourself is, would you just listen

[04:14] first? Don't worry about how this fits

[04:17] in, but listen very carefully. Again, I

[04:20] just spoke with Sean Atwood. I'll be

[04:22] having this up very, very soon, but I

[04:24] want to tell you about something which

[04:25] is important, which right now is now is

[04:28] the time, my friend. I mentioned this to

[04:30] you before, but one of our great

[04:33] sponsors, my Patre Supply since day one

[04:35] has been a part of preparing you for the

[04:38] absolute worst.

[04:41] They survive. Oh, they have some great

[04:43] products that you might need for

[04:44] camping, but that's not what they're

[04:46] for.

[04:48] If there is ever a civil war, civil

[04:51] unrest, false flags, blackouts, EMP,

[04:53] riots, whatever you want to call it,

[04:57] it's not tomorrow's nightmare. It's

[05:00] today's fear, today's reality. You see,

[05:05] the systems that we trusted are just are

[05:08] crumbling. They're cracking. One week

[05:10] without food and you'll learn fast.

[05:12] You'll find out that cash, credit,

[05:15] Bitcoin, diamonds, gold, doesn't matter.

[05:18] It won't feed your family. Survival is

[05:21] in theory. It's primal. It's primordial.

[05:23] It's instinctual. Food, water, energy,

[05:26] ammo. That's why my Patriot supplies

[05:29] three month food kit matters. Over 2,000

[05:32] calories a day. 22 meal varieties. Shelf

[05:36] life up to 25 years. Right now. Right

[05:40] now, you get four weeks free, a $247

[05:45] bonus. The world has changed. Hunger is

[05:48] the oldest weapon of control. Don't wait

[05:50] for disaster to prove it. Preparation

[05:52] isn't paranoia, it's survival. Click the

[05:55] link in the description in this video.

[05:58] Prepare lino.com. That's our link.

[06:01] That's your ignition switch to securing

[06:03] your food, securing your family, and

[06:05] also securing your future. preparewith

[06:08] lionyl.com preparewithl.com

[06:14] Now today my friends I love when someone

[06:17] comes up and says let me give you an

[06:19] alternative theory I listen to the DA

[06:22] read the charges I love when they say

[06:26] aggravated murder oh and obstruction of

[06:28] justice and witness tampering because he

[06:31] spoke with somebody after the fact

[06:35] they took Three to four different camera

[06:39] angles.

[06:40] Three to four. How many of you, my

[06:43] friends, saw this go up? This this

[06:46] shirt. How many of you saw a shirt move

[06:50] up and jerk up? How many of you saw

[06:53] that? How many of you saw a shirt kind

[06:57] of fly up? It looked as though something

[06:59] happened. People were seeing

[07:00] immediately. Well, what that was,

[07:03] that was a uh how do I say that? That

[07:06] that was a ricochet or a deflection

[07:11] off of the

[07:17] under the the uh armor that he was

[07:20] wearing.

[07:22] Where people got this from, I have no

[07:23] idea, but they that's what they said

[07:25] that it was it was from this armor.

[07:29] Okay, fair enough. And they believe that

[07:31] yes they did that the bullet hit and

[07:35] went up and that's this here that that

[07:41] everyone not everyone many many people

[07:44] learned more than I say that is an exit

[07:47] wound. An exit wound

[07:52] here.

[07:54] Right here. Right here.

[07:58] this part right here

[08:01] that it went through and through

[08:03] deflections or bouncing or whatever came

[08:06] out this way. Where is that round? I

[08:09] don't know. But then I say, "Wait a

[08:10] minute. The crack of the rifle over

[08:13] there, I think I think comported and

[08:17] timed perfectly with this reaction."

[08:21] That makes me wonder about it.

[08:25] I just saw perhaps something that is I

[08:29] can't believe what I just wrote.

[08:32] Does it matter that much? You can't be

[08:37] serious. I'm going to say I'm going to

[08:39] leave this let this go as some attempt

[08:41] at humor. Does the fact of an additional

[08:47] shooter, a conspiracy,

[08:51] not the lone shooter, does it matter

[08:55] much? We're going to let that go and

[08:57] say, "Leave humor and comedy to the

[09:00] professionals."

[09:02] I'm hoping that's comedy. I hope that

[09:05] is. I hope that was somebody saying,

[09:07] "Hey, look at me. I'm going to say

[09:09] something stupid."

[09:12] and mission accomplished. So what

[09:14] happens is that's the part that makes me

[09:16] wonder now as various folks one in

[09:19] particular there is a marine uh sniper

[09:22] who was trained notices that a couple of

[09:25] things let me try to explain this.

[09:27] Charlie apparently was wearing a an

[09:31] earpiece here.

[09:35] This is a earpiece here.

[09:38] And he was he had this device here of of

[09:43] some sort. And then later on he had this

[09:47] underneath his shirt and there was a

[09:50] maybe a microphone here. But the idea

[09:53] was that he had a lot of this wire

[09:55] underneath his shirt and you could even

[09:56] see it at some point. You could see this

[10:00] fly out. You could see the earpiece

[10:04] fly out and move because this was

[10:08] connected underneath his shirt. You

[10:11] could see the shirt move as this became

[10:14] taut and expanded and connected to the

[10:18] earpiece that for whatever reason flew

[10:20] off this way. So that might explain it.

[10:22] It's not that critical, but it gives you

[10:25] an idea. But one of the most important

[10:27] things as they looked at every

[10:30] conceivable angle there's like four or

[10:32] five

[10:34] four or five different angles. The one

[10:36] which is the most important

[10:39] was Charlie's looking this way was an

[10:41] angle this way

[10:44] because it showed what was behind him

[10:47] here. Now imagine I'm looking here but

[10:50] to my right in the back I'm I'm Charlie

[10:53] facing the audience. To my right and

[10:55] back are buildings, windows, buildings,

[11:00] and there's one little flash, one flash,

[11:06] one flash or a reflection. It could be

[11:10] muzzle fire. It was just one frame.

[11:15] And it was at or about the time when

[11:19] this

[11:21] happened when this reaction

[11:27] at that time it was suggested or it is

[11:30] suggested or is being posited POST it

[11:34] was being suggested advanced

[11:37] that maybe maybe the reason for that is

[11:40] something a little different maybe what

[11:44] we are seeing Maybe what's happening

[11:45] here is something different. Maybe this

[11:48] is something indicating another

[11:52] shooter.

[11:54] Now, if that is true, what questions

[11:58] would you ask? This is when I get to

[12:01] tell who's really involved in this,

[12:04] who's good, who knows what they're

[12:06] doing. What questions would you want to

[12:09] ask? Not to debunk that. Maybe you want

[12:12] to divide it, but what questions do you

[12:15] think are interesting regarding this?

[12:19] That's the most important story. What do

[12:22] you think is the most important?

[12:26] What are the issues? What are the

[12:27] stories? What are those,

[12:31] how do I say this? What are those pieces

[12:34] of information

[12:37] which are critical for you to consider

[12:39] with all that is going on right now?

[12:43] That's the issue.

[12:45] The question is, as somebody laughingly

[12:48] suggested,

[12:49] what difference does it make? So,

[12:53] somebody actually asked that asked that

[12:56] what difference

[13:00] does that make?

[13:02] So, we're going to pretend that that was

[13:04] legitimate. Let me ask you, what

[13:07] difference do you think it makes, dear

[13:10] friend? What

[13:12] What difference do you think it makes?

[13:17] Tell me, dear friends, tell me. Tell me.

[13:19] Tell me. Tell me. Tell me. What

[13:21] difference

[13:24] does it make?

[13:27] You heard today.

[13:29] Imagine we are in trial.

[13:33] And imagine, and by the way, this isn't

[13:35] in quote support of this fellow. I have

[13:39] no feelings one way or another. I mean,

[13:41] I hate the idea of the killer is what's

[13:43] problem, but but but but I know people

[13:46] people get very upset because of that.

[13:47] They always think that somehow you're

[13:49] you're you're

[13:53] they think that you're enjoying this,

[13:56] that you're supporting these people,

[13:58] that you're

[14:01] whatever it is. I don't I don't know

[14:03] why.

[14:05] I'm not sure why, but in any event, but

[14:09] what difference you think it would make?

[14:10] Imagine you're in court and you're

[14:13] representing him

[14:15] and they say their whole case was that

[14:17] he was the lone shooter. He was the

[14:21] shooter. He was it he was the shooter

[14:27] and that he acted alone.

[14:30] That he acted alone and he was a part of

[14:33] this world, if you will. But he was he

[14:39] was

[14:42] and you say let me give you a counter

[14:45] theory to this. Let me show you a

[14:47] different theory. Let me show you a

[14:49] different theory which nobody's thought

[14:50] of before. There was somebody else. Now

[14:52] the question is how would that work?

[14:55] Would he know this

[14:58] if I told because I mean you have to

[15:00] think could he have been theoretically

[15:04] could he have been

[15:06] involved in this thinking he was the

[15:10] lone person involved thinking he was it

[15:14] could he could he have been

[15:18] the lone shooter thinking he was the

[15:21] lone shooter when in fact he wasn't.

[15:22] Could

[15:26] he have been what people use the term a

[15:29] pathy?

[15:30] Could he have thought, we're going to

[15:33] put you there. You're going to catch the

[15:35] heat. You're going to get you're going

[15:37] to catch the heat and you're going to be

[15:39] responsible for taking all of the

[15:41] responsibility of this. You understand

[15:43] it? Yes, I do. You are. Got it. You are

[15:47] the one. Yes, I am. But in fact the

[15:50] professional team is elsewhere

[15:54] the profession.

[15:58] Now what most people do is they have to

[16:00] ask themselves and this is where it gets

[16:01] into trouble. Why would they do that?

[16:04] And we get into this this question all

[16:07] the time quib bono

[16:09] or que protest. Who benefits? And they

[16:12] love to ask that question. Who in their

[16:14] right mind would benefit? Why would

[16:17] anybody want to do this? Why would

[16:18] anybody suggest? Why? How does this

[16:22] work? Now, let me explain a couple of

[16:24] things to you which is important, very

[16:25] very critical for you to understand and

[16:27] to grasp.

[16:29] There is something that is not being

[16:30] talked about. Alex Jones talked about

[16:33] it. Judge Npalitano talked about it. Tim

[16:36] Dylan talked about it. Everybody and

[16:39] their mother talked about it. And that

[16:41] is the role and the aspect of Israel.

[16:46] Have you heard this? If you have not,

[16:50] you're not paying attention.

[16:52] And it goes something like this.

[16:57] It is suspected. I'll try to give you as

[16:59] many versions of this. Some people

[17:02] suggest that Israel, Apac and others,

[17:05] not really Apac, but Israel was

[17:07] responsible for the bulk of the

[17:12] monstrous amount of money that Charlie

[17:15] Kirk was handling

[17:19] 150 180 million a year. I mean, this is

[17:22] 80 million. Who knows?

[17:26] This is bigger than anything. So people

[17:29] are suggesting and I'm giving you an a

[17:31] kind of an overview. I'm giving you an

[17:33] overview what's happening. But other

[17:34] people are suggesting that at one

[17:36] particular time Charlie

[17:40] was more

[17:42] dutiful

[17:44] in portraying

[17:48] in advancing

[17:50] the Israeli line, so to speak. part of

[17:55] his prototypical conservative uh

[17:59] worldview.

[18:02] And that something happened. Something

[18:05] happened.

[18:06] Charlie was out and about. Charlie was

[18:08] in Tampa for one of his talk turning

[18:12] points uh USA meetings. He had was with

[18:16] Tucker Carlson. There was uh um uh uh

[18:22] Dave Smith. There was a debate

[18:26] Dave Smith against a Zionist.

[18:29] Tucker was exceedingly exceedingly

[18:34] um

[18:39] critical of not only Israel but also

[18:42] Bill Aman, the

[18:46] monster hedge fun, the person

[18:49] responsible for basically removing the

[18:52] gay whatever her name was, the the uh

[18:54] the president of Harvard and others. He

[18:56] was he was an an absolute zealous

[19:00] Zionist some would say

[19:03] and that they were furious with this

[19:05] furious furious with Charlie furious and

[19:08] according to Max Blumenthal the argument

[19:10] is that even BB Netanyahu said Charlie I

[19:16] either I want to speak with you and

[19:17] Charlie's feeling this this compunction

[19:20] maybe some would say too big for his

[19:22] britches maybe either maybe he figured

[19:25] I'm going to finally I'm going to

[19:28] finally deal with this. I'm finally

[19:30] going to address this.

[19:34] Or maybe maybe I just had enough. Or

[19:37] maybe I don't need them. Maybe I'm so

[19:40] big that I just don't need these people

[19:42] anymore. Maybe I don't need BB or Israel

[19:44] or what. Maybe I'm just going to act on

[19:46] my own. I'm just going to act on my own.

[19:49] I'm I'm just going to be I don't know

[19:51] what happened.

[19:53] I know it was suggested that a lot of

[19:55] folks a lot of folks were coming to the

[19:58] to the the aid if you will

[20:02] or not the aid but to the side I should

[20:04] say of of BB and they were saying things

[20:06] or excuse me of uh of Charlie and

[20:08] they're saying why are you doing this

[20:10] young people were saying why why are you

[20:13] involved in this why in the name of God

[20:16] are you involved in this don't you

[20:18] understand that we and a lot of people a

[20:20] lot of people a lot of people were

[20:24] feeling this absolutely powerful

[20:26] feeling. I hear things on a regular

[20:31] basis. I cannot believe what I'm

[20:32] hearing. I heard a talk radio host say

[20:37] seriously say

[20:39] that it's good that

[20:43] it's good that um how do I say this?

[20:46] It's good that um uh Israel finally

[20:49] finally handles Gaza. Oops. and get.

[21:07] Sorry about that. That they were saying

[21:09] it's good that that that he gets the job

[21:13] done. Get go in there and finish off

[21:16] finish off Gaza, Palestinians. I mean,

[21:19] after all, this is war. Now, if I didn't

[21:22] know better, when I hear somebody say

[21:23] that today, I'm thinking, are you on the

[21:25] payroll? I don't know. I don't know.

[21:28] Again,

[21:30] there's nothing illegal with this.

[21:32] There's the climate payroll. There's the

[21:34] Second Amendment payroll. There's the

[21:36] big pharma payroll. Loads of people on

[21:39] that one. There are many, many payrolls.

[21:41] Don't don't don't be unfair in pointing

[21:44] too much at Israel as though they're the

[21:46] only ones who who've learned the mastery

[21:50] and the benefit of this thing called

[21:55] not propaganda but like but in any

[21:57] event.

[22:00] So the story is that Charlie was feeling

[22:03] not trepidacious but also wondering am I

[22:05] doing the right thing? People are asking

[22:07] him Charlie are you are you really a

[22:09] Christian? are you? So finally he said I

[22:11] can't do this any according to Max

[22:14] Blumenthal and others BB said I want you

[22:16] to come to Israel we want to show you

[22:19] and he said no no no

[22:24] and with that move the largest

[22:28] largest

[22:30] conservative young movement in the

[22:34] United States without a question that

[22:36] they may or may not have funded before

[22:38] may or may not been funed indirectly has

[22:41] now turned their back on him. So people

[22:43] say this made folks furious.

[22:48] There were suggestions that BB Netanyahu

[22:51] when he was I think it was Boris Johnson

[22:53] said that when he went to use the toilet

[22:55] he left the listening device supposedly

[22:59] suggesting that

[23:01] Israel left stingrays or or surveillance

[23:05] equipment around the White House. I hate

[23:07] to break it to a lot of people, but one

[23:09] of the things that our own Bill Casey,

[23:12] head of the CIA, was quite uh fond of

[23:17] saying was he reminds you when he used

[23:19] to go to different these places, he

[23:20] would put listening devices into couches

[23:23] and sofas and chairs with little

[23:25] needles. So, it's one of the things that

[23:27] spooks do that people do.

[23:33] You don't know how much we do. So, so

[23:35] I'm remember I don't get angry about

[23:36] this. I just accept it. They're very,

[23:38] very vigorous, very, very aggressive in

[23:41] the pursuit of their particular club.

[23:43] Okay.

[23:44] The argument then became that Charlie

[23:47] was worried, worried about his personal

[23:49] safety, worried about maybe he's gone,

[23:51] he the point of no return.

[23:54] Word has it also that President Trump

[23:56] was worried about his own

[23:58] safety, his own uh well-being.

[24:03] And then Candace Owens.

[24:07] Candace Owens who has got the biggest

[24:10] mouth of anybody. And people say, "I

[24:13] love her bravery." I think sometimes

[24:15] it's foolhardy. basically after Charlie

[24:19] was

[24:21] dispatched, murdered,

[24:24] and after his wife is trying to salvage

[24:26] this organization that Charlie had

[24:28] worked so hard to put together over a

[24:32] period of time.

[24:34] Candace is telling everybody, "You don't

[24:35] understand. Charlie told me this.

[24:37] Charlie was worried about this. Charlie

[24:39] did this. Charlie didn't like this one.

[24:40] Charlie

[24:43] and I'm thinking Erica might say, shut

[24:46] up.

[24:49] You don't speak for Charlie.

[24:52] I don't want you to speak for Charlie.

[24:55] You're going to destroy us. We're trying

[24:58] to maintain to to resurrect, if you

[25:01] will, or not or not, but but recover.

[25:04] And we don't need you making us a bigger

[25:07] target by virtue of what you're saying.

[25:09] Stop

[25:11] doing this. Stop saying this. Stop. But

[25:15] that's that Candace can't do that

[25:17] because Candace is brave. She's got a

[25:20] big mouth. She says whatever she wants

[25:23] and she's angry. And I think right now

[25:26] the focus should be I think you all

[25:27] agree the focus should be on people

[25:29] specifically who could help draw in

[25:32] these thousands of new young voters, new

[25:36] registrants, new participants, new

[25:40] registered voters and change the

[25:43] complexion, change the face of the

[25:45] American electoral system. Absolut

[25:48] absolutely

[25:50] critical critical

[25:54] So the issue then becomes, and this is

[25:56] even more important, the issue then

[25:57] becomes, well,

[26:01] what happens now? What happens for

[26:03] Charlie? Well, a couple of things are

[26:06] there's some side issues and and I think

[26:08] my worst fear came about because I told

[26:10] you this is going to be the most

[26:11] important thing that we need to do is to

[26:13] focus spec focus on what needs to be

[26:17] done to promote Charlie's message and to

[26:20] promote the uh TPUSA. That's the most

[26:23] important. Not not this other stuff, but

[26:26] we're too late for that.

[26:28] Stephen Miller and others are saying

[26:30] we're going to crush the left wing.

[26:32] We're going to crush them. I don't know

[26:34] what that means. Pam Bondi who

[26:37] embarrassed herself by saying that hate

[26:40] crimes are not protected was it is so

[26:44] sad so

[26:46] sad for the attorney general to say

[26:49] that. I don't even I I don't know what

[26:51] to say. I don't know what to say.

[26:54] People are screaming screaming and I

[26:56] have let's go after Antifa. Let me tell

[26:58] you what they're going to tell you about

[26:59] that. People are going to say Antifa is

[27:02] small potatoes. Antifa is a bunch of

[27:05] nuts and rag, you know, people who wear

[27:08] uh rags and and helmets. And fine, if

[27:12] they're so small, they should be easy.

[27:16] Don't turn your back on them. I mean,

[27:18] I'm not saying they're they're the

[27:19] Gambino crime family, but what I'm

[27:21] suggesting is don't turn your back on

[27:23] them. Don't turn your back on them and

[27:25] don't just walk away from them. They're

[27:27] it's very very serious that you that you

[27:29] do something about them. In the

[27:30] meantime, you also have right now people

[27:33] who are and it's delicious to see them

[27:35] screaming and yelling, "How come I lost

[27:37] my job? Because you're an idiot." And

[27:40] now you know what it feels like. Like we

[27:42] had to go through when we lost our jobs

[27:44] in our positions and we couldn't go to

[27:45] work and go on public transportation

[27:47] because you screamed and yelled about

[27:48] that stupid co. Well, payback's a

[27:51] And now you're going to feel it. And I'm

[27:53] sorry. I'm petty. I'm vindictive. Okay.

[27:59] You're also going to see these Discord

[28:01] folks who are going to say, "What

[28:02] exactly did Charlie

[28:06] was this rifle even fired?" We don't

[28:09] know anything. Also, I'm sorry, Charlie.

[28:11] Um, Tyler, when Tyler was arraigned

[28:13] today, did you see his affect? He looks,

[28:16] you'll love this one. MK Ultraesque.

[28:20] Very flat. Flat a effect. Even like he's

[28:26] like he's I don't know what the word is

[28:31] kind of sedated maybe through some type

[28:33] of anolytic or whatever I don't know but

[28:36] it's very very interesting very very

[28:38] interesting and all of these things I

[28:41] found to be so fascinating to me because

[28:44] there's so many moving pieces

[28:47] but going back to what I thought

[28:52] how do we know what about this scenario

[28:54] what What if Tyler never shot anybody?

[29:01] What if he says, "I never got a round

[29:04] off."

[29:05] Or, "I did get a round off, but you're

[29:07] telling me somebody else's area. You're

[29:10] going to be the fall guy." And when you

[29:13] bring this up, you're going to be told,

[29:14] "You're a conspiracy theorist. You're

[29:16] weird. You're sick. You're strange.

[29:18] There's something wrong with you. You

[29:20] always complicate things. You just can't

[29:23] leave well enough alone. You always got

[29:25] to go in there and mix it up with your

[29:26] lunacy because that's what you do. Okay,

[29:30] let him say that.

[29:34] But there's so much stuff that is out

[29:36] there, my friends. So much stuff. And

[29:38] also, there is a fight to see who wins

[29:42] the heart and minds of

[29:44] TPUSA.

[29:46] Is it Ben Shapiro? Oh, dear God, no.

[29:51] for obvious reasons. And also, I hate to

[29:54] say this, Turning Point is a Christian

[29:56] organization.

[29:59] I wouldn't be the right person to run

[30:03] that because my I'm not religious. And

[30:06] one of the things I think one of the

[30:08] core values, one of the core aspects of

[30:09] this is that you have to have enjoy a

[30:11] certain degree of religiosity, but also

[30:13] to be Christian. and Ben Shapiro would

[30:16] uh the notion of Nick Fuentes is no he

[30:20] would cause too much distraction a

[30:22] groper in there whatever it is

[30:26] but focus on what's happening right now

[30:30] because two things happened number one

[30:33] the

[30:34] the explosion of this this this love the

[30:39] explosion of love for Charlie is

[30:41] something that I didn't think I don't

[30:42] think anybody even even imagine Imagine

[30:46] ever even imagine or could have

[30:47] anticipated. That's one thing. And next,

[30:50] if it is shown, if it is shown

[30:54] that somehow

[30:58] there is indeed a an Israeli connection,

[31:02] let me say this right now.

[31:06] I don't have any indication of Italy,

[31:09] Israel, India,

[31:13] um, Spain or Portugal or anybody or the

[31:17] clan or the mob being involved in this.

[31:20] Not that it couldn't be. I just haven't

[31:23] heard anything. I ju just haven't. But

[31:26] the question is simply this. What will

[31:29] happen next?

[31:31] Sparky says, "What if TPUSA is forced to

[31:34] have Ben Shapiro take Charlie Kirk's

[31:36] place instead of Erica Kirk?" Imagine

[31:39] that. Well, Sparky, that would add uh

[31:42] that would kill recruitment. It would

[31:45] destroy the organization. But then

[31:48] again, if indeed Israel, as some people

[31:51] are suggesting, actually funds that,

[31:55] I think they would have jurisdiction to

[31:57] call the shots. Our grandchildren might

[32:00] learn the truth later. Maybe.

[32:03] Do you know the truth about

[32:06] JFK?

[32:08] Nope. What about Bobby Kennedy? Nope.

[32:12] You don't have any? Nope. Is that

[32:15] something? Isn't that something how that

[32:17] works? It's fascinating, is it not? So,

[32:20] what I want you to do is I want you to

[32:22] think about this and I want you to keep

[32:23] but research. Research everything. Spend

[32:27] all the time that you have, all the time

[32:30] that's available, doing everything that

[32:32] you need to research this.

[32:36] These are the questions you have to ask.

[32:39] These are critical questions you have to

[32:42] ask. You understand what I'm saying?

[32:45] This is the most important thing. So,

[32:46] let me just tell you something. I am

[32:48] going to be on tonight. Mrs. L tonight,

[32:51] think of her as my what would you call

[32:53] yourself? my executive

[32:57] liaison.

[32:59] She's going to be representing, of

[33:00] course, that August organization, Lind

[33:03] Warriors. She'll be on WABC tonight from

[33:06] 1 at 1:00 a.m. ET. Tune in. She is a

[33:11] barn burner. She is

[33:14] spunky. Anyway, that's tonight at 1:00

[33:17] a.m. In addition, that's that.

[33:20] Also, I'm going to be on from 1:00 to

[33:22] 5:00 talking about this as well. We've

[33:23] got some surprise guests coming up on

[33:26] the WABC channel which people want to

[33:28] be. I want you to scour everything. I

[33:31] want you to and I want you to do me a

[33:33] favor and turn cable news off. You are

[33:38] never going to learn anywhere remotely

[33:42] truthful. What cable news? By the way,

[33:44] the word also is a rumor is that ABC is

[33:47] going to be hiring influencers versus

[33:50] journalists and the like. The day of

[33:52] going to to be the Mary Richards to work

[33:55] in a TV network to be a reporter, it's

[33:57] over with. It's dead. It's finished.

[33:59] It's through. Done.

[34:01] Done. I say done. Done. Like you cannot

[34:05] believe. Oh yes.

[34:08] Oh yes.

[34:10] Don't forget to follow Mrs. L at Lens

[34:12] Warriors. Don't forget to follow here

[34:13] right now, Lionel

[34:17] Nation, and also our sister, our joint,

[34:20] if you will, our other channel, Lionel

[34:23] Legal. I've got brand new, brand new

[34:25] drops on that in the most important and

[34:28] most critical story I think anybody's

[34:29] ever seen. This is This has so many

[34:32] moving parts. It is the most fascinating

[34:34] story there is, bar none. I've never

[34:38] seen anything like this. Anything. And

[34:42] Sparky says, by the way, says Israel was

[34:45] a huge fun of TPUA. That's what I said.

[34:49] That's why they got bent out of shape

[34:51] when Kirk stopped talking, taking their

[34:54] money. That's what I said.

[34:58] Now, do you think they went so far as to

[35:00] have him dispatched? There's no evidence

[35:02] of that. None. But that doesn't mean

[35:05] it's impossible. That doesn't mean that

[35:07] Charlie wasn't scared. But right now,

[35:09] there's no evidence. the only evidence

[35:11] that we have, we'll see because if the

[35:13] only evidence that that is out there

[35:15] regarding potential alternative

[35:17] ballistic uh theories as well, if

[35:19] they're never aduced or recognized in

[35:21] court, they'll just go the way of, you

[35:24] know, seed oil

[35:28] hysteria, whatever. I I don't know. But

[35:30] we'll know the truth. We'll know the

[35:32] truth. All right, my dear friends, have

[35:34] a great and a glorious night. Thank you

[35:36] so much. Don't forget tonight WABZ. Tune

[35:38] in 7:70 a.m. on your dial. And don't

[35:43] forget also those wonderful folks, our

[35:46] great great sponsors, our great great

[35:48] friends at preparewith lionyl.com.

[35:51] You get a free 4-w week emergency food

[35:54] kit. We've never had this deal before.

[35:58] This is it.

[36:00] And when I tell you this, I don't know

[36:01] when they end. I I go online and go up,

[36:04] it's over. They don't give me a heads

[36:05] up. They don't say last week, last I'm

[36:08] sorry. I don't know because the the

[36:10] deals change so fast because the volume

[36:12] and the inquiries and the sales because

[36:15] right now, as you know, things are

[36:16] pretty bad. All right, my friends. Have

[36:19] a great and glorious day. Thank you so

[36:21] much for being with us. Until again,

[36:22] until we meet again, I should say. Until

[36:24] then, remember the monkeyy's dead. Oh.

[36:26] Oh, and then later on tonight at about

[36:28] 9:15, 9:30, the Shan Atwood performance

[36:32] that I just had with him, we'll drop it

[36:34] here for you to see what we did. So,

[36:36] make sure you subscribe to Lionel Nation

[36:38] because you're going to want to see

[36:39] that. I had Sean pissing in his pants

[36:42] laughing. Why? It's a gift. All right,

[36:45] my friend. Talk to you soon. Don't ever

[36:47] don't ever change. And until then,

[36:48] remember the monkeyy's dead. The show's

[36:50] over. Sue you. Da da.