Charlie Kirk and Rising Conservative Voices Reveal Why Republicans Are Losing Young Voters and What Must Change

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Rallies Arizona Crowd After RFK Jr Endorsement of Donald Trump

Charlie Kirk Rallies Arizona Crowd After RFK Jr Endorsement of Donald Trump

17:45

Charlie Kirk Declares Culture War at CPAC: America's Next Generation Faces Choice Between Freedom and Socialism

Charlie Kirk Declares Culture War at CPAC: America's Next Generation Faces Choice Between Freedom and Socialism

11:33

Charlie Kirk Delivers Unfiltered Truth on Dating, Marriage, and Family Formation at Turning Point Chapter Leadership Summit

Charlie Kirk Delivers Unfiltered Truth on Dating, Marriage, and Family Formation at Turning Point Chapter Leadership Summit

55:35

Charlie Kirk and Rising Conservative Voices Reveal Why Republicans Are Losing Young Voters and What Must Change

Charlie Kirk joined fellow young conservative leaders Francesca Chambers and Jesse Blumenthal at Colorado Christian University to deliver hard truths about the conservative movement's failure to connect with young Americans. At just 19 years old, Kirk explained why Mitt Romney lost the youth vote by margins that should alarm every Republican: candidates refused to appear on MTV, VH1, and Comedy Central while Obama showed up and connected. The panel dissected why a 78-year-old Ron Paul could pack college auditoriums while younger, more polished candidates struggled to fill rooms. Their diagnosis centers on a fundamental problem—conservatives talk in abstractions while the left makes issues concrete and personal to young people's daily lives.

Categories: Speeches
August 24, 2013

The Urgent Crisis Facing Conservative Messaging to Young Americans

At a Colorado Christian University panel on young conservative voices, Charlie Kirk delivered a sobering assessment of why Republicans continue to hemorrhage support among voters under 35. Introduced as a 19-year-old founder and director of Turning Point USA who had already appeared on Fox News over 25 times, Kirk didn't mince words about the Republican Party's failure in the 2012 election and beyond.

Kirk posed a fundamental question that party leaders had failed to answer: Why didn't Republican candidates appear on MTV, VH1, and Comedy Central during the 2012 campaign? While President Obama made himself available to young audiences on the platforms they actually watched, Republican candidates sent a clear message by their absence—young voters simply weren't worth their time.

The consequences were predictable and devastating. When Kirk asked young people why they didn't vote for Governor Romney, the answer was consistent: How could they vote for someone who wouldn't even come to the stations they watched?

Making the Abstract Concrete: The NSA Example

Kirk identified what he considers the core problem with conservative messaging to young people: the movement speaks in abstractions while failing to make issues concrete and personally relevant. He used the NSA scandal as a masterclass in how to transform abstract policy into immediate personal concern.

Before Edward Snowden released documents about government surveillance, the NSA was an abstract concept to most young people. Overnight, Snowden changed that. Suddenly, every time a young person picked up their phone, sent a tweet, or wrote an email, they thought about being watched. The issue became concrete and personal.

In contrast, Kirk noted, Republicans talk about the national debt in abstract terms that fail to resonate. Meanwhile, the left tells young people something concrete: "Your student loan interest rates will double if you vote for a Republican." That message lands. Generic promises to "create more jobs and help the economy" do not.

The Ron Paul Phenomenon and the Power of Liberty

Kirk challenged the conventional wisdom that Republicans need younger candidates to win young voters. Instead, he argued for better ideas, using Ron Paul as his primary example. Despite being 76-78 years old and not particularly charismatic, Paul packed the University of Illinois Assembly Hall so full that organizers needed overflow rooms.

What explained Paul's appeal? Kirk distilled it to one principle: freedom from government. Paul's entire platform, regardless of specific policy positions, communicated a consistent message of individual liberty. Young people responded to that fundamental belief that they should be free from government interference to live the lives they choose.

Kirk wasn't endorsing Paul's entire platform, but he insisted the conservative movement must learn from his success. If a septuagenarian with unconventional manmannerisms can mobilize legions of young supporters purely through a message of liberty, the lesson is clear: young people fundamentally support and love freedom.

Red Alert Politics and the Conservative Media Gap

Francesca Chambers, editor of Red Alert Politics and a rising star in conservative journalism, addressed the structural disadvantages conservatives face in reaching young audiences. Red Alert Politics, owned by Philip Anschutz's company alongside The Washington Examiner and The Weekly Standard, launched specifically to fill a glaring gap in conservative media.

Chambers was frank about the challenge: "Let's be honest, the Weekly Standard isn't exactly what the young folks are reading." Red Alert Politics was designed to be fundamentally different—plugged into social media, sometimes funny, occasionally edgy, and accessible even to politically apathetic young people or those not necessarily fiscally or socially conservative.

One of their signature initiatives, the annual 30 Under 30 list, directly counters the left's narrative that no young people support conservative causes. The list highlights emerging young conservatives across the nation, giving them platforms on national television and at major conferences.

The Long Game Progressives Are Playing

Chambers delivered sobering news about the structural advantages progressives have built: they play the long game while conservatives focus on election-year strategies. Progressives don't wait until six months before an election to court young voters—they invest consistently over years and election cycles.

When Chambers was in college in Kansas, one of the most conservative states in America, progressive organizations like Planned Parenthood and EMILY's List maintained constant campus presences. Conservative groups were nowhere to be found.

She pointed to progressive conferences that feature youth caucuses where young people gather to discuss their concerns and propose changes to the movement. These forums give young progressives ownership and voice. Conservative conferences, by contrast, rarely create such spaces.

Chambers also noted that teaching young conservatives to write effectively is essential for developing the next generation of conservative journalists who can compete in mainstream media—not just conservative outlets, but CNN and other major platforms where they can have broader impact.

The Brand Problem and the Empathy Gap

Jesse Blumenthal, a client strategist at Engage consulting firm and former staffer in John Boehner's office, diagnosed the conservative movement's brand problem in two parts: failure to demonstrate empathy and simple failure to show up.

Blumenthal drew a vivid parallel to legal immigration. At citizenship ceremonies across America, when new citizens walk out after taking their oath, Democratic Party representatives and liberal activists are waiting to welcome them, engage them, and share their values. Conservatives are absent from these moments of civic celebration.

Polling after the 2012 election revealed something striking: the number one reason young voters supported President Obama wasn't his accomplishments but the perception that he was trying. Young voters felt he understood their concerns and cared about their struggles, even when he failed to deliver solutions.

In an MTV interview, Obama took credit for legislation making it easier for small investors to support new companies—the JOBS Act that Eric Cantor and Republicans had championed. Obama opposed it, then claimed it as his own achievement. Republicans had done the work but failed to communicate it effectively, losing the credit for fundamentally conservative, pro-entrepreneurship legislation.

Free Enterprise Versus Crony Capitalism

Blumenthal identified a perception problem that undermines conservative economic messaging: young people see the conservative movement as pro-big-business rather than genuinely committed to free enterprise. This distinction matters enormously to a generation that values entrepreneurship.

Millennials consistently rank starting their own business as highly desirable, yet they perceive conservatives as defending entrenched corporate interests rather than championing the next generation of entrepreneurs. The cronyism between big business and big government gets glossed over by conservative leaders.

The farm bill exemplified this problem. Conservative groups focused on SNAP and food stamp reform while ignoring that 80% of farm subsidies go to just 15% of farmers—recipients who typically have higher net worth and lower failure rates than average small businesses. Until conservatives are willing to challenge these entrenched interests, Blumenthal argued, they won't be credible when advocating for entitlement reform.

Internet Freedom as Conservative Opportunity

Both Blumenthal and Kirk identified internet freedom and technology issues as natural conservative territory that the movement has largely neglected. The internet sales tax debate illustrated the problem perfectly.

Gallup polling showed 57% of Americans oppose internet sales taxes, but among young people, opposition jumped to 73%. Yet who was advocating for internet sales taxes? The largest retailers and online sellers like Amazon, who want to crush smaller competitors by imposing multi-billion dollar compliance costs.

This is textbook crony capitalism—large businesses using government power to eliminate competition. Conservatives should be leading the fight against it, but too often remain silent or even supportive.

Kirk warned that nothing turns off young people faster than threatening their internet access or privacy. The battle over SOPA brought together Heritage Action and the ACLU in defense of digital Fourth Amendment rights. These issues transcend traditional political divisions and speak directly to values young people hold dear.

What Turns Young Conservatives Away

When asked what messages from conservative leaders most alienate young conservatives, Kirk pointed to anything that erodes personal liberty and individual freedom to make life decisions. The perception that conservatives want to take away freedoms young people currently enjoy is the number one reason people under 35 reject conservative candidates.

The panel agreed that how conservatives discuss social issues creates major generational divides. On gay marriage specifically, younger voters—including younger conservatives—have simply grown up in a different environment. Many have gay friends and see gay relationships as normal parts of their social landscape.

Francesca Chambers clarified that she wasn't suggesting conservatives abandon traditional marriage advocacy, but that plastering college campuses with traditional marriage messages won't attract young people to conservative events or ideas. It's simply not an effective entry point for engagement.

Foreign Policy and Fiscal Conservatism

Charlie Kirk identified foreign policy as perhaps the biggest divide between older and younger conservatives. Young conservatives want national defense but not international offense. They question why fiscal conservatism shouldn't apply equally to military and foreign policy spending.

This creates tension with older conservatives who supported more expansive foreign policy interventions. Younger conservatives ask: if we're serious about reducing spending and limiting government, shouldn't that apply to all programs in a balanced way?

The Debt Discussion Young People Aren't Having

On financial issues, Chambers noted that most young people remain completely insulated from the debt crisis. Nobody comes to their door asking for a $50,000 check, so the $18 trillion national debt remains abstract. Conservatives haven't effectively communicated how much each young person will actually be responsible for over their lifetime.

She dismissed the student loan interest rate debate as a false issue that doesn't affect most young people and won't win their votes. What young people across the political spectrum do care about is the out-of-control cost of college itself. If college were affordable, student loan debt wouldn't be an issue.

Jesse Blumenthal added that people process large numbers poorly. The average person can't meaningfully differentiate between one trillion, five trillion, or eighteen trillion dollars. Repeatedly citing the national debt figure isn't effective messaging.

Instead, conservatives need to discuss practical costs, moral obligations, and consequences of inaction. Talk about the Social Security check that won't arrive for the elderly woman on fixed income. Discuss the high medical care costs that will continue eroding the economy if Medicare's bad incentive structures aren't fixed. Humanizing these numbers makes them meaningful.

Learning to Listen Before Selling

Charlie Kirk offered a sales analogy that applies to political persuasion: when selling aluminum siding door-to-door, you don't tell potential customers what to think. You listen to their concerns, understand their perspective, then frame your pitch accordingly.

Too often, Kirk argued, the conservative movement assumes it knows what young people want without actually listening. The effective approach is spending the first 30 minutes listening at a college campus, then making the persuasive argument based on what you've heard.

He also noted crucial terminology: among young people, "capitalism" has become a bad word thanks to how it's taught in schools. "Free market" tests better, but "entrepreneurship" resonates powerfully because it means creating wealth from nothing—exactly the opportunity young people want.

The Media Young People Actually Trust

Chambers delivered perhaps the panel's most sobering revelation about media consumption: when young progressives were polled about which philosophers they most respected, Jon Stewart ranked number two and Stephen Colbert number three. This wasn't an exaggeration—it was documented in polling data Red Alert Politics reported.

At least young conservatives named actual philosophers: John Locke, Ayn Rand, Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan. But this underscores the challenge conservatives face. Young people are watching The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, and those programs shape their political understanding.

Trust in media overall has plummeted among young people, which is understandable given the frequency of corrections and retractions on major stories. But conservatives need to either create programming that can compete with Stewart and Colbert or get conservative voices onto MTV, The Daily Show, SNL, and other platforms young people actually watch.

Where Conservative Voices Excel

The panel highlighted examples of conservatives who effectively engage young and skeptical audiences. Mike Huckabee's appearances on The Daily Show, along with Condoleezza Rice's similar interviews, demonstrated how conservatives can enter hostile formats and come across as both reasonable and persuasive.

These appearances work because they humanize conservative positions and demonstrate empathy—showing that conservative leaders understand concerns even of those who disagree with them. This emotional connection matters more to young voters than detailed policy papers.

The Path Forward

The panel's prescription for the conservative movement centered on several key changes:

  • Show up where young people are—college campuses, MTV, Comedy Central, social media platforms
  • Play the long game with sustained investment in young outreach, not election-year strategies
  • Make abstract issues concrete and personally relevant to young people's daily lives
  • Champion entrepreneurship and free enterprise while challenging crony capitalism
  • Lead on internet freedom and technology issues
  • Listen before persuading, understanding concerns before making arguments
  • Demonstrate empathy and communicate that conservatives understand young people's struggles
  • Focus messaging on liberty and freedom from government interference
  • Humanize large-scale issues like the debt by discussing practical consequences
  • Create youth caucuses and forums where young conservatives can voice concerns and shape the movement

 

Charlie Kirk closed with his core message: young people fundamentally support and love liberty. If conservatives can effectively communicate how their policies protect individual freedom and allow people to live the lives they choose, the message will resonate. The current generation isn't apathetic—they're waiting for leaders who will listen, show up, and speak to their actual concerns rather than abstractions.

At just 19 years old, Kirk embodied the panel's central argument: the conservative movement doesn't necessarily need younger candidates, but it desperately needs better ideas communicated more effectively. The talent exists among young conservatives—what's needed is for the broader movement to empower, listen to, and learn from the rising generation that will determine conservatism's future.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!