Charlie Kirk Calls Out Oprah Winfrey for Enabling Meghan Markle's Victim Narrative and Betraying American Success
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Charlie Kirk Defends His Debate Tactics and Fact-Based Approach Against Accusation of Manipulative Rhetoric
12:01
Charlie Kirk Confronts Protesters at Supreme Court Kavanaugh Confirmation Rally in Washington D.C.
3:49
Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Defend Work History References and Address Kyle Kulinski Debate Rumors
1:48
Charlie Kirk Calls Out Oprah Winfrey for Enabling Meghan Markle's Victim Narrative and Betraying American Success
Charlie Kirk dissects the Meghan Markle and Prince Harry interview with Oprah Winfrey, arguing that the real story isn't about the royal couple but about Oprah's transformation from a champion of self-improvement and personal responsibility into a validator of victimhood. Kirk challenges Meghan's racism accusations against the royal family, calling them unsubstantiated and ungrateful, while expressing deep disappointment that Oprah, who embodies the American dream as a billionaire who rose from nothing, would create a platform for oppression narratives instead of challenging them. He contrasts the Oprah of the 1990s, who inspired millions with messages of empowerment and achievement, with today's version who he sees as a destructive force in American media.
Charlie Kirk begins by addressing what he calls an obligation to discuss the Meghan Markle and Prince Harry saga. He references a tweet from Ben Goldsmith, an expert on the British monarchy, that challenges the prevailing narrative about the couple's departure from royal life.
According to Goldsmith's analysis, the narrative promoted by Meghan's friends, leftist mainstream media, and critics of the royal family claims the couple was driven out of Britain due to snobbery and racism. However, Goldsmith argues this simply isn't true. The British tabloid press and public initially adored the idea of a glamorous star from Suits marrying into the royal family and were excited by the novelty of their royal wedding at Windsor Castle.
The tide only turned, Goldsmith explains, when people realized Meghan was "a pushy ungrateful entitled gag inducingly politically correct hollywood gold digger who just gone and hitched herself up to britain's favorite cheeky chappy warrior prince and turned him into an emasculated humorless husk of his former self."
Challenging the Racism Accusations
Kirk questions whether society is now prepared to blame racism for the allegedly oppressed life of Meghan Markle, someone who was literally admitted into the royal family. He recalls that the royal wedding was one of the most positive media events of recent decades, with extensive celebratory coverage.
He criticizes Meghan for accusing the entire royal family of racism without providing any specifics—no names, no times, no events. Kirk suggests she's playing a narrative that allows her to profit, likely making upwards of seven million dollars for the interview, by positioning herself as someone who has seen the inner workings of a powerful institution and can now expose racism at the highest levels of ancestral aristocracy.
Kirk plays a clip where Meghan discusses concerns and conversations about how dark her child's skin might be when born. When pressed, she admits these were just feelings and assumptions rather than concrete evidence. Kirk condemns this approach, stating: "Meghan you are now allowing your feels feelings I guess I should say to dictate an accusation of a family that largely by all evidence available embrace you what an unbelievably ungrateful person you are no gratitude perfect leftist no gratitude."
Piers Morgan's Response
Kirk highlights Piers Morgan's reaction to the interview, which he considers "Pierce Morgan at his best." Morgan demands specifics: "Who said that let's have a name rather than allowing everyone to think that it could be anyone in the palace it could be the queen uh prince philip it could be charles it could be camilla it could be any of them."
Morgan insists on knowing the name, the conversation, and the context, arguing that without answers to these questions, the whole family is being labeled as basically racist. Kirk goes further, suggesting Meghan may be fabricating the story entirely, comparing the situation to Jussie Smollett, or that someone said something completely different that she's now reframing to generate sympathy.
The Real Issue: Oprah Winfrey
Kirk shifts focus to what bothers him most about the entire situation—not Meghan and Harry themselves, but Oprah Winfrey's role as the third person in the interview. He acknowledges that Prince Harry is "a metrosexual beta male" lacking testosterone, and that Meghan is "a tradition-destroying leftist who's self-indulgent," but argues this isn't breaking news.
What troubles Kirk is Oprah's participation and validation of the victimhood narrative. He outlines Oprah's extraordinary life story: she started from nothing, went through legitimate trials, worked harder than any other television host throughout the 90s and early 2000s, conducted some of the most consequential interviews of the last 25 years, and became a billionaire black woman.
Kirk emphasizes that Oprah was always about self-improvement, independence, empowerment, rising above circumstances, and being a victor rather than a victim. She had an entire following of mostly suburban women believing in themselves and the power of applied action. Black American women followed her in huge numbers as she led a charge promoting the idea that despite troubles around you, you should work harder and play by the rules.
Oprah's Transformation and Betrayal
Kirk expresses frustration that despite Oprah's success—being the richest black woman in the world with Harpo Productions and properties in Hawaii and Santa Barbara—she would entertain the idea that racism exists as a barrier to human success. He argues that only in America is it possible for Oprah Winfrey to succeed, yet she creates "this forum of oppression olympics" and "this framework of where we're now going to allow you to go complain professionally."
He believes the real Oprah Winfrey, the phenomenal 1995 version who interviewed Donald Trump and gave away cars for fun, has been suppressed into an angry and bitter person. Kirk imagines how the 1990s Oprah would have handled the interview differently, challenging Meghan directly: "Okay Megan you're saying this are you really trying to say people should feel sorry for you right now with the privilege with the wealth that you obviously have are you trying to say that black women can't succeed obviously I've succeeded."
Instead, Oprah validated the concern. Kirk references a statement Oprah made last summer: "White people don't understand that whiteness itself gets you through life in ways that blackness cannot."
A Call for Responsibility
Kirk concludes by arguing that Oprah, more than the couple themselves, should be the focus of criticism. She has lived the story of what it means to be an American entrepreneur—someone with grit, hustle, and earned success. Yet her entire platform now is dedicated to the validation of victimhood.
He criticizes Oprah for not pressing the issue or challenging such a controversial claim, something the old Oprah would have been obligated to do. Instead, she has become "this bitter angry and dare I say destructive force in the american media landscape."
As someone born and raised in Chicago, where Oprah built her empire, Kirk was raised with her story of rising above circumstances and being a victor. He concludes with a sharp rebuke: "Oprah Winfrey has too much power too much wealth and too much influence to be so reckless and irresponsible."
