2,387 videos 1,376,944,188 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Debates College Students: Why 80% of Universities Shouldn't Exist and the College Scam Exposed
Charlie Kirk squares off with college students at East Carolina University in a heated debate over whether college is a scam. With 52% of graduates taking jobs that don't require a degree, Kirk argues that most students are being deceived about the value of their education. He challenges the notion that college is necessary for success, advocates for trade careers like carpentry and plumbing, and reveals why he's skeptical of hiring college graduates at his own company. The students push back, defending the value of higher education, but Kirk contends that the majority are wasting time and money on degrees they'll never use.
Charlie Kirk didn't hold back during his visit to East Carolina University, engaging in a spirited debate with students about whether college constitutes a scam. The discussion began with Kirk defining a scam as "when a majority of people aren't getting the money that they're paying for." Students immediately challenged this definition, with one arguing that a scam requires dishonesty, not just poor return on investment.
The debate quickly intensified when Kirk revealed a startling statistic: 52% of college students end up in jobs that don't require a college degree. This meant that half the audience would spend four years and accumulate debt for credentials they'd never actually need. One student defended the system, arguing that people who come to college for specific careers like teaching know upfront they won't make $300,000. But Kirk pushed back, questioning why universities don't tell students the hard truth about their employment prospects.
The Harsh Reality About College Requirements
Kirk asked the audience how many had been told it was necessary to go to college, and hands shot up across the room. "They've all been lied to and scammed," he declared. "And the university reinforces it. Got to stay here. Got to stay here. No, you don't. Actually, you could get a better job by not going here."
A student countered that if employers require college degrees, then college can't be a scam because it's preparing students for those jobs. But Kirk highlighted the disconnect: while some jobs do require degrees, many graduates end up in positions that don't, making their education retroactively unnecessary. "So it's a scam for that person," Kirk argued. The student responded, "That's on them," suggesting personal responsibility. But Kirk wasn't buying it, pointing to the systemic pressure that funnels young people into higher education regardless of whether it serves their interests.
The Hidden Cost of the College Path
Beyond the question of whether degrees are necessary, Kirk emphasized the financial burden. Students paying too much money, staying too long, and taking unnecessary classes all contribute to what he calls the scam. One student acknowledged agreement on this point, admitting that students could likely get what they need in a year and a half rather than four years.
Kirk also highlighted the opportunity cost. Those 52% of students who end up in jobs not requiring degrees aren't just wasting tuition money—they're also four years behind in earning potential and often saddled with student loan debt. "They make actually less because they have student loan debt and they're four years behind. That's the opportunity cost," Kirk explained.
When asked about the comparison to private high schools, Kirk drew a distinction. Classical or Christian schools offer higher quality education with different values. But when it comes to college, he sees East Carolina University as merely a more expensive version of a community college degree, not necessarily a better one.
The Trades Alternative
Kirk repeatedly pointed to trade careers as superior alternatives. "If you guys want to be a millionaire, go become a carpenter," he told the students. "That's where the money is right now because we send all of our kids to the laptop class and not the muscular class."
When a student suggested that if everyone went into carpentry, the market would be saturated, Kirk shot back with a cultural observation: "You know why it won't happen? Because your parents won't treat you as well." He asked how many students would face parental disapproval if they announced plans to become a plumber instead of finishing college. The implication was clear—social pressure, not economic reality, drives college enrollment.
Kirk, who comes from a trade family himself, sees millions of dollars waiting to be made in skilled trades while students chase "some stupid piece of paper." He argued that parents equate success with college credentials when financial opportunity lies elsewhere.
The Internship and Networking Myth
One of the common defenses of college is the networking opportunities and access to internships. Kirk demolished this argument bluntly: "You guys want an internship, drop out of college and ask for it. Like literally, this idea that you need to go to college to meet people, it's insane."
As someone who employs 1,500 people, Kirk revealed his own hiring bias: "If I find out you go to college, I'm super skeptical of you. Seriously, I'm like, what deprogramming do I have to do here?" This admission underscored his belief that college doesn't just fail to add value—it actively instills attitudes and ideologies that employers may need to undo.
The student Kirk was debating maintained that college provides better connections and opportunities for building professional networks, but Kirk remained unconvinced. His hiring practices reflect his conviction that college attendance is more liability than asset.
When College Makes Sense
Despite his strong opposition, Kirk and the student found some common ground. The student, studying finance on an in-state scholarship with minimal debt, represented a best-case scenario. Kirk acknowledged that for certain professions requiring certification, college serves a gatekeeping function, even if the education itself isn't particularly valuable.
The student admitted, "You need it for certification, not for education." Kirk agreed this was a different issue, though he noted that even in finance, many people now skip college entirely and make millions of dollars straight out of high school.
Kirk also showed sympathy for students drowning in debt. "I meet these kids sometimes and they have $100,000, $200,000 in student loan debt and they'll have nothing to show for it," he said. Both agreed that students shouldn't attend college if they're pursuing jobs they could get without a degree or if the degree won't actually improve their job prospects.
The Agreement on the Core Problem
By the end of the debate, Kirk and his student opponent had reached a significant point of agreement: approximately 80% of students at East Carolina University probably shouldn't be there. The student concurred 100%, acknowledging that college shouldn't be attracting people who won't benefit from attending.
Kirk pressed the point: "That's a scam then." But the student pushed back, arguing that colleges aren't necessarily convincing students they should attend to get better jobs, just informing them of what jobs they can pursue with degrees. Kirk countered that most colleges he visits constantly tell students that college is necessary, that it's great, and that graduates earn more money.
The final question Kirk posed was devastating in its simplicity: "Did you guys know that half of you will never use your college degree? Did you guys know that?" The student he was debating confidently asserted he would use his degree, but Kirk's point was about the collective, not the individual. The system fails half its participants, yet continues to operate as though it serves everyone.
The Personal Responsibility Debate
Throughout the conversation, a tension emerged between individual choice and systemic deception. The student repeatedly argued that if people choose to attend college for careers that don't require degrees, "that's on them." Kirk rejected this framing, insisting that when institutions create an environment of pressure and misinformation, individual choices aren't truly free.
He pointed to the universal messaging students receive: college is necessary, college is the path to success, college is what responsible young adults do. When half of students end up not needing their degrees, Kirk argued, the problem isn't individual decision-making—it's institutional dishonesty.
The student maintained that colleges aren't being dishonest because they're not promising specific salary outcomes. But Kirk's broader definition of the scam encompasses overpricing, unnecessary course requirements, extended timelines, and the fundamental mismatch between what's sold and what's delivered.
Looking Beyond the Bubble
Kirk closed with a prediction: "I'm not going to convince you guys. You guys think it's this great thing. It's fine. In 5 years, they'll be like, 'Oh my gosh.'" He suggested that students inside the college bubble can't see the reality that becomes obvious once they're out in the working world.
This perspective reflects Kirk's broader critique—that colleges create insular environments where their own value is constantly reinforced, making it difficult for students to evaluate alternatives objectively. Only after graduation, when faced with job markets, debt payments, and career realities, do many students recognize what Kirk was trying to tell them.
Whether or not one agrees with Kirk's characterization of college as a scam, his statistics and arguments reveal uncomfortable truths about higher education. With half of graduates taking jobs that don't require degrees, millions of dollars available in trade careers, and mounting student debt, the conventional wisdom about college deserves rigorous questioning. Kirk's willingness to have these debates on college campuses brings that questioning directly to the students who need to hear it most.
