And not a lot of people in this country
knew of him until the assassination of
Charlie Kurt. And then it was Spencer
Cox who was before the cameras asking
Americans if we could just all stop
hating each other.
A police report from Cedar City, Utah,
described surveillance video of the man
accused of killing Charlie Kirk pulling
a gray Dodge Challenger into the gas
station at around 7:15 a.m. on September
11. Well, 7:17 to be exact. That is
according to a Scripps News exclusive.
Scripts filed an open records request.
In the video, according to scripts,
Tyler Hamilton is seen wearing a maroon
colored shirt and a dark colored hat,
filling up his vehicle with gas, and
just three minutes later driving away. A
maroon colored shirt and a dark colored
hat. Sound familiar?
I got nightmares in my head. I feel
my mind feels like a ter
I got nightmares in my head.
>> Hello and welcome to True Crime Rocket
Science. This footage provides further
corroboration that the Dairy Queen image
is legit, which means we're getting an
even more complete picture now of his
movements in the post-meditation phase.
Tyler Robinson sure does seem to like
that maroon colored shirt, doesn't he?
But what inferences can we draw from
this new CCTV footage? Before we deal
with five inferences drawn from the gas
station CCTV, I want to deal with a
handful of comments. One that has come
up a few times now is that the crime
scene, the tent where Charlie Kirk was
shot. Well, it wasn't cordoned off.
Well, it was. Have a look at these
photos from the air, from the ground,
zoomed in, not only of the cordon, but
of officers actually putting up the
cordon. Jeepers guys, where are you
getting your information from? I mean,
if you can't get a simple, small,
obvious detail like this right, maybe
you should leave proper true crime
analysis to the big boys. Of course, you
can't know any of this if you don't
watch the news or read any news because
you don't trust the news. Then there's
also this comment. Do you not even read
your own comment section? The ratio of
people who don't believe the official
narrative versus you is astronomical.
How long are you going to keep towing
the line for the feds? Unless you are
one. Hey, true crime, read the room.
Well, I am reading the room and yes, I
do read many of the comments and I
understand there are a huge number of
people who don't believe the official
story. I also know there are some huge
channels pushing the conspiracy
narrative and also some small ones that
are trying to jump on the gravy train.
He also refers to the ratio of people
who agree versus those who don't agree.
And here's my response to that.
>> I don't care
because I'm not here to win a popularity
contest. That's not my number one
priority or my only priority. I'm here
to investigate these cases in an
authentic way. You guys do know that I
studied law. So, I actually do care
about the law. I'm also not unaware that
those who are spreading these false
claims are doing exactly what America's
adversaries want you to do because they
want you to sow chaos and distrust
online. And that is exactly what you are
doing. That is exactly what you're
consuming and it's exactly what I'm
fighting against. Have a look at this
article from Politico. After Charlie
Kirk's killing, false claims flourish
online with help from US adversaries.
Foreign adversaries are weaponizing
major news events to seow chaos and
distrust online. Now consider the
content you're consuming and consider
the possibility that this is just sewing
chaos and distrust. And the more
confusion and mistrust they can inject
right after breaking news event, the
harder it becomes for people to know
what's true and who to trust. If people
doubt law enforcement, journalists or
democratic institutions, it weakens
those institutions ability to act and
communicate in a crisis. So all of this
matters. All of this is very high
stakes. And that's why I'm trying to
counter this false narrative. If that's
something you agree with, if that's
something you believe in, countering
this false narrative and you want to get
on board with it, now is your chance to
subscribe to the most authentic voice in
true crime. If you're finding this
analysis worthwhile, please do hit the
thanks button. A big thank you to
Consistent Try and Debbie McNeel for
hitting the thanks button. Thanks very
much, guys. And let's get started. All
right, and that brings us to five
inferences drawn from the gas station
CCTV. It was
>> we went back to Utah Valley University
on the first day of class. It was 7 days
since Charlie Kirk had been murdered
there.
>> Now, one of the things I want you to
realize is it took about a week for
Tyler Robinson to allegedly plan his
whole thing. Well, it's going to take us
quite a length of time to understand all
the insights and all the ins and outs
that he had to come up with over a
week's worth of planning. You're not
going to understand a case in one day or
one hour or one video. And so it is
going to take a bit of time to fit the
and find the puzzle pieces. And so this
CCTV which came out a couple of days ago
is another puzzle piece that gets a lot
of others to fit neatly into place.
Number one being acting alone. The fact
that we see Tyler Robinson and only
Tyler Robinson in this footage
corroborates the official narrative
which is that he acted alone. At the
very end of the affidavit, it says, "I
have reason to believe the defendant,
Tyler Robinson, committed the offenses
as charged herein, the defendant and
nobody else." Right? We also see Tyler
Robinson alone at the Dairy Queen and at
the moment of the shooting, he's the
only one running along the roof at the
time of the shooting. Number two, we see
him with a vehicle on the day of his
arrest. Should it really be we see Tyler
Robinson with his vehicle on the day of
his arrest? Now, one potential defense
for Tyler Robinson is that someone
borrowed his car or someone could have
taken his car, but this footage confirms
he was driving it. And you can actually
see when he drives off, you get a you
get a quite a clear view through the the
window almost at a 90° angle, and you
can see there's only one person in that
vehicle. Number three, trace through
financial transactions. This is the
number six clue we all missed. We know
it was him because it was traced via
financial transactions. It's quite
simple to do in practice, but not
necessarily easy to investigate. You can
flag the transactions. You can identify
the location of the transactions. You
can determine if there's CCTV in the
area of the transaction. If there is,
you can go and collect the CCTV,
assuming it's not been recorded over. If
it hasn't been recorded over, you can
then match the timestamp on the
transaction to the CCTV. And voila.
That's also how they trace the Dairy
Queen footage as well.
>> You didn't see that coming.
>> By the way, this is the number six clue
we've all missed. Can you name the clues
one to five? Or haven't you really been
paying attention? Right. Inference
number four, wearing the same clothes.
It's mentioned twice in the affidavit
that Robinson discarded the clothing he
wore when he fired the rifle. This is
the first reference and you can see at
the bottom. We want to circle that in
red. Discarded the clothing he wore when
he fired the rifle. Here's the second
reference. When Robinson turned himself
in, he was told it would be best if he
brought all the evidence with him to the
sheriff's office to avoid police having
to search his parents' home. Well, the
family friend also asked Robinson if he
had any clothes that were related to
what he did. Robinson replied that he
had disposed of the clothes in different
areas. That's also an interesting
confession to say, well, I got rid of a
lot of clothing. Well, if you're
innocent, why would you throw clothes
away? When else did you throw clothes
away in different areas? And by the way,
that's these clothes and possibly this
backpack as well. Right. Number five,
significance. Where did he dispose of
his clothing? And what is the
significance of the garage stop overall?
Well, it might be nothing, but it might
also be that he went there to dispose of
his clothing. I don't mean at the garage
stop, but in Cedar City, you know,
rather than do that where the heat might
be in Aram. Dumping his clothes in his
hometown he may have felt was too close
to home. If not, if he wasn't dumping
his clothes, what was he doing there?
What was he doing in Cedar City? so
early in the morning. Was he still on
his way home from Orum? Or was he on the
way to work, perhaps heading to a
part-time job from home? He can't be
heading to college because DTC, that's
Dixie Technical College, is back in St.
George. So, it does make one wonder
where did Tyler Robinson spend the
night? Since he's wearing the same
clothes, did he perhaps sleep in his
car? If he was concerned after his
interaction with the cops near the
wooded area and before heading to Dairy
Queen, perhaps he felt going straight
home was just too risky. If he delayed
going to the wooded area because of cops
in the area, perhaps he didn't go home
that night for the same reason.
Meanwhile, it does seem like he was home
at some point on on September 11. When
his mother called later that morning
after seeing the news, that's where he
said he was. Robinson's mother stated
the following to police. On September
11, the day after the shooting,
Robinson's mother saw the photo of the
shooter in the news and thought the
shooter looked like her son. Robinson's
mother called her son and asked him
where he was. He said he was at home
sick, that he had also been at home sick
on September 10th. Well, this visit to
the garage proves that that's not true.
And heading to Cedar City, if he was
homesick just to put in fuel doesn't
make any sense under those
circumstances. Robinson's mother
expressed concern to her husband that
the suspected shooter looked like
Robinson. Robinson's father agreed.
There is also another question. What
happened to the clothing the shooter
wore during the incident? Well, we know
it was disposed of, but exactly where
and exactly when. Was it after his
mother showed him the surveillance
footage or before? And was this early
morning run to the garage part of that
effort of getting rid of his clothing or
had he done that in a CCTV tracking and
tracking of financial statements shows
also why serial killers today are a
relic from the past. It's very difficult
to commit murder these days and get away
with it. Well, get away without being
seen, let alone serial murder. All
right, that's six clues. How many of you
can name clues one to six so far? And
what do you think? Do I need to keep
going with these clues? Because
>> I can do this all day.
>> Yeah.
>> Okay, I'm not going to take it further
than that. Meanwhile, there is another
mystery that is really deepening in
Australia. A little boy that has gone
missing with so few clues. It really is.
He's been missing for 8 days now. It
really is quite a headscratcher. In any
event, thank you for listening wherever
you are. Stay safe. Enjoy your weekend.
And I'll see you guys next time.
Heat. Heat.
[Music]
Heat. Heat.
[Music]
[Music]
Heat. Heat.
[Music]