So Charlie Kirk is very talented at
speaking to students who have opposing
views to him in front of a large crowd.
I mean, let's not underestimate that
when you've got loads of people watching
you, things are on film, anything he
says can go viral because he's so, you
know, he's got such a big following now.
Um, so he can't slip up. Um, he but he
does a very effective job uh at making
the case for the things he believes in.
And here he is talking to uh some kind
of anti-Israel questioner student. Um
and Charlie pushes back. Have a watch. I
think that Trump has a lot of
dictatorial tendencies. And so one of
the recently he posted an AI video uh of
himself at the Gaza Lago. And so what's
your opinion on that? Is that not
concerning to you that the leader of the
supposed free world is posting about an
ethnic cleansing of a group of people in
I wouldn't use that term first and
foremost. But yeah, I mean again I don't
want to overanalyze the video, but it
did show Gaza being built beautifully
into kind of like um Hong Kong, right?
He said that he wants to take those
people out and remove them from Gaza to
then the beach. That's the definition of
ethnic cleansing. It's removing an
ethnic group of people from a specific
but let me ask you and I don't know the
answer to this. What what would you say
is a reasonable solution to this problem
to to Gaza? I think a two-state
solution. I think that there Israel is
committing a genocide against the
Palestinian people. Got it. So, but I I
don't want to sp this is too much Israel
stuff and but it's fine. Okay. How have
how did Gaza not have its own
government, its own over the last 15
years? What else more do they want?
Well, Israel was not involved in their
politics, was not involved in their
leadership decision, but they're trying
to take it now. They want No, no, no.
They already had it for 15 years. What
happened?
So, rephrase that. Israel pulled out of
Gaza completely in 2006, right? Gaza was
under its own rule. They were in charge
of they had a two-state solution. So So
what happened was we already had a
two-state solution. What happened? Hamas
Hamas happened and but I don't support
but but they were democratically
elected. So we got to find a solution. A
two-state solution means that people
like that will win again. So what is the
solution? I I think the solution is
completely separating the two and and
and having completely separate borders.
They destroyed it. Now we're past they
were separate. Israelis were not allowed
into Gaza for the last 15 years. So what
what you're what you're suggesting has
been tried for the last nearly two
decades, but they took it over now and
then not that that's not the point. I'm
saying you're you're suggesting
something that has already been tried.
Did it work? It it didn't work there.
No. Okay, that's the point. So maybe
that's not a solution. But the solution
now isn't a solution. So I think the
solution is that they're probably going
to have to go to Egypt or Jordan because
what's happening in Gaza is they keep on
supporting. Is that not the definition
of ethnic cleansing? I I would not use I
would not use that term. Is is it a
dramatic move? Without a doubt. Okay.
Okay. Dramatic move. Thank you.
Appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you very
much. Thank you. Yes. Yes, sir.
So, it's so important that um people
gain clarity on the whole situation.
The fundamental mistake that people make
is thinking that Israel was somehow in
Gaza and responsible for making the
situation, you know, just being so
involved in in the li the living
conditions of the people of Gaza. But
that's a fundamental error. So people
say, you know, come on, Israel has to
try a two-state solution. There was a
mini two-state solution.
There really was one.
Israel pulled out in
2005 from
Gaza. People seem to be under this
impression. It's like
Israel blockaded Gaza, turned it into a
quote unquote open air prison. And so,
of course, after that, Hamas rise to
power, etc. No, it's the other way
round. Everyone gets cause and effect
the wrong way round. Israel left. They
had a mini two-state solution here, a
trial run of a two-state solution in
Gaza. And what happened? They elect
Hamas. And after they elect Hamas and
they start getting rockets from Gaza
into Israel, Israel says, "You know
what? We're going to have to start
censoring what comes into Gaza to censor
it for weapons and things that could be
used for
ammunitions." Then people say, "Oh,
Israel's blockading Gaza." No, Israel's
allowing in food, medicine, supplies,
but they're not going to all land
weapons. Wouldn't any sane country do
that to protect their people? What
you're saying, Israel can't protect
their people? That's ultimately where
the criticisms boil down to. If you want
to understand the criticism of Israel,
what it boils down to, it's not allowing
Israel, the Jewish people, the nation
state of the Jews to do what they need
to do to protect
themselves, which is just another form
of anti-semitism dressed up as virtue.
They say, "Oh, you know, we're just
supporting the Palestinians and we just
care about them and we think Israel's
going too far." No, no, no. You're
you're you're blood lieling Israel and
saying that anything she does in
self-defense is wrong, evil, thus saying
you basically want to see the
demise of
the nation state of the Jewish
people. It's really that simple. Hi,
thank you so much for watching. To watch
another one, click here. To stay up to
date with all our content, click here to
subscribe. And if you're able to, you
can help support JTV to grow and grow by
clicking join below this video, where
you can become a member and get perks,
including early access to videos and
private live discussions with me. But
most of all, you'll be partnering with
us on our mission to change the world.
