[00:00] my friend. And yet a another permutation
[00:03] of why the ongoing
[00:08] treatises the daily installments of of
[00:11] Candace are not only important as to
[00:13] understand what's going on regarding the
[00:15] variety of issues unmented regarding you
[00:18] know Charlie Cork and TPUSA and
[00:20] everything but but it provides a
[00:22] separate from that separate and distinct
[00:23] from that a kind of a tutorial
[00:26] a daily
[00:28] instructional if you will on a lot of
[00:31] issues such as conspiracies
[00:34] and how to look at what's happening.
[00:38] What I suggest to you, and I'm dead
[00:39] serious about this, get someone, maybe a
[00:42] youngster, maybe a a relative, somebody
[00:44] in your household, somebody from Gen X
[00:47] or whatever the heck it is, get them to
[00:52] get them to watch this and then
[00:54] afterwards explain to them, here's the
[00:58] theory behind this.
[01:02] This is what this is about.
[01:05] This is the overarching
[01:07] story
[01:09] because what this is is not a a recap so
[01:12] to speak, not a transcription, not a a
[01:16] list of claims, but an attempt on my
[01:19] part, at least a a legitimate attempt to
[01:22] articulate a way of thinking
[01:25] that many people sense but struggle to
[01:28] describe and expatiate and limb and
[01:30] understand and grasp. Especially right
[01:32] now, it is about pressure and awareness
[01:36] and power and the strange feeling that
[01:39] the world is no longer behaving the way
[01:42] it once did. Sound familiar? It's about
[01:45] why certain questions provoke fury and
[01:48] anger instead of answers and why that
[01:50] reaction alone tells you something very
[01:54] important.
[01:56] You see, at the center of it all, at the
[01:57] center of this, the epicenter, so to
[01:59] speak, of this way of thinking, is a
[02:02] simple observation.
[02:04] When systems are confident, they
[02:06] tolerate curiosity and questions. When
[02:09] they're fragile, when there's really
[02:11] nothing there, they punish it. They
[02:13] won't tolerate it. The intensity of the
[02:15] response tells you more than the content
[02:19] of the question ever could. Especially
[02:21] when you see a lot of these so-called
[02:24] influencers who are being paid by
[02:26] somebody or something to attack Candice
[02:29] at all levels. They're told, "Get them.
[02:32] Never refute what she's saying." You
[02:34] notice this? Ne never refute
[02:37] the basics or bases of what she's
[02:39] saying. Just instead go after her. You
[02:43] see, that's the atmosphere that we're
[02:44] living in right now.
[02:46] This is incredible. And it's not
[02:48] disagreement. It's not debate, but it's
[02:50] a kind of kind of a weird weird hair
[02:53] trigger hostility towards noticing
[02:55] patterns and asking for coherence or
[02:58] refusing to accept official explanations
[03:00] at face value. Let me tell you
[03:02] something. This is a tutorial. Listen to
[03:04] me. This is the sermon of the day. There
[03:06] is a growing sense, my friend, that
[03:08] reality itself itself feels very
[03:10] unstable. Not not in a sci-fi way. I
[03:13] don't mean that. but but in a
[03:15] psychological and cultural way as in
[03:17] SCOPS as in conspiracies as in
[03:20] manipulation of the narrative. That's
[03:23] exactly what this is. People experience,
[03:27] I guess you'd call it a mismatch between
[03:29] what they remember, what they intuitit,
[03:32] and and what they are told to believe.
[03:34] And when they voice
[03:36] when they voice
[03:39] that kind of mismatch or disconnect,
[03:41] they're not corrected. They're mocked.
[03:44] and they're labeled. Has this happened
[03:45] to you? Happens to me all the time, my
[03:47] friend. I'm at home. In fact, if they
[03:49] don't mock me, if people don't dispute
[03:51] what I'm saying, I must not be doing
[03:52] something right because there's no
[03:54] there's no solace in the majority.
[03:57] Believe me, they're worried about tone
[03:59] and influence or danger. And the message
[04:01] is not you are wrong. The message is
[04:05] stop looking. Remember what I'm telling
[04:07] you. Remember what Uncle Lionel's
[04:08] telling you. The left loves to tell you
[04:11] what you can't say, but the right wants
[04:14] to tell you what you can't think. That's
[04:17] the difference.
[04:20] Listening to Candace reminds me that the
[04:22] reaction is the first clue that
[04:24] something very interesting, some
[04:26] something very something very deep and
[04:29] much deeper is happening. You see, this
[04:31] framework starts from the idea that
[04:33] power that power no longer operates
[04:36] primarily through force. Nope. It
[04:38] operates through narrative control,
[04:41] through the myth, the mythology, the
[04:43] fable, what we all say and what we're
[04:45] allowed to say, and through emotional
[04:48] conditioning and constant distraction.
[04:51] Oh my god. Hey, you got a problem in
[04:54] Minnesota? We'll fix that. Worry too
[04:57] much about fraud in Minnesota with that
[04:59] wall. We know how to fix that. We got a
[05:01] problem with this part of the Middle
[05:02] East, know how to fix that. we could
[05:05] change your direction because they know
[05:07] and they think that you can't handle two
[05:08] different ideas simultaneously at the
[05:10] same time as Scott Fitzgerald instructed
[05:13] us to do. You see, the modern system
[05:15] doesn't need to convince you of of of
[05:18] one truth. It only needs to exhaust you
[05:22] and confuse you and make you give up and
[05:24] make you doubt your own perceptions
[05:26] where you say, "Oh, the hell with it."
[05:27] You see, if people stop trusting
[05:29] themselves, then they become easy to
[05:31] steer and to veer and to direct. It's
[05:34] like slide of hand. And this is why
[05:37] certain experiences are treated as
[05:39] unserious or embarrassing. Moments of
[05:41] intuition, moments of aha, the epiphany
[05:43] moments, unexplained coincidences, you
[05:45] know, sudden clarity, emotional
[05:47] recognition, this limpidity to use the
[05:50] correct word that arrives before logic
[05:52] catches up. These things are dismissed
[05:55] because they bypass. They completely
[05:58] shortcircuit the approved channels of
[06:00] authority and they don't want you to
[06:02] think that. See, they remind people that
[06:04] consciousness is not fully programmable.
[06:07] See, are you following this? Now, from
[06:10] this perspective,
[06:12] the discomfort people feel today is not
[06:14] randomly not random anxiety. It's it's
[06:17] the friction created when when I guess
[06:22] lived experience no longer aligns with
[06:24] the official script. When what you see
[06:26] when perception and reality don't
[06:28] connect, time feels strange, things are
[06:31] weird, events feel repetitive, culture
[06:33] feels frozen, looping the same conflicts
[06:37] over and over again in the same outrage,
[06:39] the same outrage and anger cycles, the
[06:42] same manufactured crises over and over.
[06:44] It's the Hegelian dialectic, right?
[06:48] Problem, [snorts] reaction, solution,
[06:50] the whole notion of thesis, antithesis,
[06:53] and synthesis.
[06:55] Please stop this and look this up. See
[06:59] for yourself. It makes perfect sense.
[07:03] Do you ever think that progress feels
[07:05] artificial? Like motion without
[07:09] movement.
[07:11] We're moving, I think. And that
[07:13] sensation alone would be unsettling
[07:14] enough, but it's compounded by another
[07:16] observation. The people and institutions
[07:20] that claim to be in control, whatever
[07:22] they are, they no longer look composed
[07:25] or in control or rational. They look
[07:27] reactive and scary. They look impatient
[07:30] and frightful and on a hair trigger,
[07:32] especially mainstream media news who was
[07:35] just they're shuttering everything and
[07:37] they have to comply more and more.
[07:39] Comply and comport or or or dissolve and
[07:43] they look sloppy. They overcorrect. They
[07:45] censor clumsily and they escalate where
[07:48] silence would have worked before.
[07:52] See, that's not the behavior of a
[07:53] confident system. No, no, no, no, no,
[07:55] no. That's the behavior of something of
[07:58] something losing its grip.
[08:01] And Candace Owens has figured this out.
[08:03] And every time she says something, every
[08:05] time she posts a video, every time she
[08:07] comments,
[08:09] the bad guys, the black hats say, "Oh,
[08:11] Jesus, what now?"
[08:14] refute her and I don't know what they do
[08:16] is they just send out the you know these
[08:18] these harpies these battalions of of of
[08:22] winged
[08:24] [laughter]
[08:24] whatever they are and they just mock
[08:27] her. She's crazy. She's this she's
[08:29] drinking the Kool-Aid. Let's have
[08:30] another meme. I saw one today a meme or
[08:33] some gif or something her drinking the
[08:35] Kool-Aid.
[08:37] See in this worldview awareness itself
[08:39] is the threat. Not activism, not not not
[08:42] rebellion. awareness,
[08:44] sentient, and the simple act of noticing
[08:47] patterns. Remember what I told you about
[08:49] the murmmorations of questioning
[08:51] incentives and comparing outcomes to
[08:53] process? Once people begin to do that,
[08:56] it all comes tumbling down and the
[08:59] system cannot function smoothly. See, it
[09:01] depends on passive participation, not
[09:04] informed resistance. They want you over
[09:06] there. Just look over here. We'll tell
[09:07] you what to see. Okay? Now, change your
[09:09] channel. See, this helps explain why
[09:11] personal attacks replace substantive
[09:13] argument, substantive engagement,
[09:16] substantive
[09:17] uh um dispute or a repost. You see, when
[09:22] someone raises questions that cannot be
[09:24] easily refuted, the only remaining
[09:26] tactic is character assassination.
[09:28] That's it. Make the questioner look
[09:31] unstable, dangerous, stupid, crazy,
[09:35] motivated by ego or or malice. If you
[09:38] can't disprove the argument, discredit
[09:41] the person making it. That's all they've
[09:43] got against her. And she knows it and
[09:46] she's winning. By the way, let others
[09:47] pay attention to this.
[09:50] They did it to Trump. They do it to
[09:51] anybody, anybody who comes along that
[09:54] they can't figure out or if they're
[09:55] losing, they just attack them. Attack
[09:57] the way they look. Attack the way they
[09:58] speak. Go after their mannerisms. Mock
[10:01] them. Ridicule them. Lampoon them. But
[10:03] never address what they're saying. And
[10:04] this isn't new. It's a pattern repeated
[10:07] throughout history. Whistleblowers, for
[10:09] example, whistleblowers are ridiculed
[10:11] before they they're even acknowledged.
[10:13] Heretics are are demonized before
[10:15] they're vindicated. I'm heretical, my
[10:18] friend. So are you. We're mavericks.
[10:22] We are contrarians. Oo, ain't it grand?
[10:26] Huh?
[10:27] Well, I like that. I think I just soiled
[10:30] myself. You see, the consequence is
[10:32] consistent. First denial, then mockery.
[10:35] You know the routine, then anger, then
[10:37] quiet admission years later when the
[10:40] cost of suppression becomes higher than
[10:42] the cost of truth. When they say
[10:43] reluctantly, "Okay, you're right. Okay,
[10:48] our day will come." And what makes the
[10:50] current moment unique is the scale and
[10:53] the speed at which this this pattern is
[10:56] unfolding.
[10:58] Information moves constantly.
[11:00] Contradictions are archived.
[11:02] recedes so to speak and records are
[11:05] permanent and attempts to erase or
[11:07] rewrite narratives are noticed
[11:09] immediately.
[11:11] Oh, the old remember the old playbook.
[11:13] It assumes short memory. Remember that.
[11:15] And centralized control. Not anymore.
[11:18] Neither exists anymore. Nope. It's
[11:21] different world there, Sparky. And
[11:23] another core idea in this framework is
[11:26] that human consciousness.
[11:28] Human consciousness is not as passive as
[11:33] modern materialism suggest. Thoughts
[11:36] shape behavior and and beliefs, you
[11:38] know, uh influence outcomes. But
[11:40] collective focus matters more than
[11:42] anything else. And this is not mystical
[11:44] or in a you know, in a cartoon sense. I
[11:46] don't mean that. It's observable in
[11:48] markets, in politics, in real time, in
[11:50] culture, an observable fact. And what
[11:53] people expect
[11:56] tends to materialize. See, what they
[11:58] fear often manifest
[12:01] and what they ignore completely fers
[12:05] if consciousness and by the way there's
[12:07] such a wonderful concept of
[12:08] consciousness. read everything on
[12:10] YouTube about it, especially in view of
[12:11] what's going on with AI and the whole
[12:13] notion of when is sentience and sapiens
[12:15] and all of this stuff. When is it
[12:19] when does something think? When is there
[12:21] self-awareness? But anyway, but if
[12:23] consciousness as we understand it has
[12:24] any causal power at all, then
[12:27] controlling attention becomes the most
[12:30] important objective.
[12:32] If you flood the environment with noise,
[12:35] if you keep people focused on surface
[12:38] level conflict kind of bumper sticker
[12:40] stuff, if you encourage endless
[12:43] consumption and distraction,
[12:45] anything to prevent sustained
[12:47] reflection, anything to keep people from
[12:49] asking fundamental foundational
[12:51] questions about meaning and truth and
[12:53] direction and agency.
[12:55] If you can do that, you're almost there.
[12:58] Remember currency is the real um or I
[13:03] should say rather information. What am I
[13:04] saying? Data is the real currency of the
[13:06] 21st century. Not not crypto. It's
[13:08] information and data. How do you know
[13:10] what you know? Epistemology, ontology,
[13:12] the idea of knowledge. How do you know
[13:15] what you know? Why do you believe versus
[13:17] what you know? Remember, if there was
[13:19] truth to something, if there were fact,
[13:21] you wouldn't need faith. And this is
[13:23] where technology enters the picture. Not
[13:25] as a neutral tool, but as an amplifier,
[13:28] as a critical aspect of this, screams
[13:31] accelerate everything. Emotion spreads
[13:34] faster than thought, and outrage
[13:36] outpaces understanding. Algorithms
[13:39] reward reaction, not contemplation, not
[13:42] thought, not synthesis, but reaction.
[13:44] Over time, this erodess the ability to
[13:47] sit with complexity. It also erodess and
[13:49] destroys patience for ambiguity.
[13:52] Remember, today people can't do this.
[13:54] Young people in particular, I'm anxious.
[13:55] I have anxiety. I have anxiety. I can't
[13:58] take this. I can't take this. I'm
[14:00] anxious.
[14:03] People are trained to demand instant
[14:05] answers or dismiss the question
[14:08] entirely. It's where we are right now,
[14:09] my friends. And that's why this whole
[14:11] this whole this this this
[14:14] experience with Candace, it it's a it's
[14:16] a tutorial. And yet, despite all of
[14:18] this, something is breaking through.
[14:21] Something vast. A growing number of
[14:23] people report the same feeling that
[14:27] something is very wrong. Not in a single
[14:30] policy sense but in the structure of
[14:32] reality as it is being presented to
[14:34] them. They sense manipulation.
[14:38] They sense omission. They sense that the
[14:41] story they are being told is incomplete.
[14:45] And you probably feel the same way. And
[14:48] when individuals
[14:50] explicate and articulate this feeling,
[14:52] they're not offering a unified theory.
[14:54] They're offering fragments, little
[14:58] fractals, so to speak, observations,
[15:00] anomalies, questions.
[15:03] Understand that the establishment
[15:05] response treats these these fragments,
[15:08] if you will, as dangerous because
[15:10] fragments, little shards of thought and
[15:13] and opinion can connect. And once enough
[15:16] people compare notes, patterns emerge.
[15:20] Patterns threaten centralized authority.
[15:23] This is well thought out, my friend. And
[15:25] that's why Candace presents the fear.
[15:27] See, this is why the reaction is not the
[15:28] debate. And the reaction is not to
[15:31] debate, but to suppress. Debate assumes
[15:35] good faith and shared reality. Give and
[15:36] take. What do you think? What do I
[15:38] think? Let me refute it. Let me comply
[15:39] with it.
[15:41] Suppression assumes
[15:44] >> [snorts]
[15:45] >> fragility. It assumes that even exposure
[15:48] to the question is risky. Don't even
[15:51] risk these people thinking. That alone
[15:53] should prompt skepticism. You see,
[15:56] another import and another fact which is
[15:59] so critical about all of this is the
[16:01] idea that power structures often
[16:05] misunderstand the very people they seek
[16:07] to control
[16:09] and they assume cynicism where there is
[16:11] sincerity.
[16:13] And they assume ignorance.
[16:17] They assume ignorance when there is
[16:20] discernment. And they mistake compliance
[16:22] for belief. And over time, this milk
[16:25] miscalculation compounds.
[16:28] My friend, what we have right now is
[16:29] something very, very serious. Remember,
[16:31] when pressure increases, these
[16:33] structures often double down on the same
[16:36] tactics that cause resistance in the
[16:38] first place.
[16:39] more censorship, more moralizing, more
[16:43] limitation of thought, more coercion,
[16:45] more emotional blackmail. Each
[16:48] escalation
[16:49] widens the gap between official
[16:52] messaging and lived experience.
[16:55] Remember, it's almost like they want to
[16:57] change what you think through
[16:58] brainwashing, menicide, and this creates
[17:01] the feedback loop. People feel gaslit.
[17:05] They retreat from institutional trust.
[17:07] Alternative narrative flourishes and
[17:10] then authorities respond with more
[17:12] control. Trust erodess further.
[17:14] Eventually, legitimize a legitimacy
[17:17] collapses. Not because of a single
[17:19] revelation and not not because of of
[17:22] some kind of accumulated disbelief. No,
[17:26] but it's the loop. It's the same thing.
[17:29] And within this incredible context, dear
[17:31] friend, individuals who articulate,
[17:33] individuals who explain, who expatiate,
[17:35] who meme, who who limb, I should say,
[17:39] and limb memes, but who explain, those
[17:42] who explain these dynamics clearly
[17:44] become the lightning rods.
[17:47] They're not necessarily saying anything
[17:48] new.
[17:50] They're saying it plainly. They're
[17:52] reminding you of what it's to think and
[17:53] that it's okay to think and they and we
[17:56] refuse to adopt the sanctioned language.
[17:59] We do not hedge every sentence with
[18:01] disclaimers.
[18:02] We speak directly and that alone as you
[18:06] see is perceived as a threat.
[18:10] And the hostility,
[18:12] the abject hostility that is directed at
[18:15] such figures like Candace is often
[18:17] disproportionate to their claims. Does
[18:19] she deserve any of this? And that
[18:21] disproportion is revealing. It suggests
[18:24] dread and fear, not confidence. It
[18:26] suggests that the system recognizes its
[18:28] own vulnerability even if it can't admit
[18:31] it publicly.
[18:32] That's exactly what's happening. My
[18:35] friends, there is also a and I'll say it
[18:38] a spiritual dimension to this framework.
[18:40] Though it doesn't require religious
[18:42] belief per se to understand it, but it's
[18:44] a it's it's the idea that humans humans
[18:48] are more consumers
[18:51] and data points that that that there is
[18:54] something irreducible about conscience,
[18:57] about morality, about intuition and and
[18:59] moral perception. and attempts to
[19:01] flatten humanity into these little
[19:04] predictable inputs. All of that
[19:06] generates resistance at a deep level
[19:08] when people are told what you are told
[19:10] when I am told that our instincts are
[19:12] wrong that our memories are unreliable
[19:15] and that our values are kind of outdated
[19:18] into the context of modernity. Something
[19:20] in them pushes back. You know how it is.
[19:23] something says uh-uh not not always
[19:26] consciously sometimes as anxiety and
[19:28] sometimes as anger and sometimes as
[19:31] withdrawal
[19:32] sometimes as curiosity
[19:37] and that push back
[19:40] is not inherently political. It's this
[19:43] may really sound highulutin it's
[19:45] existential.
[19:47] It's about responsibility and agency and
[19:50] control. It's about whether individuals
[19:51] are allowed to interpret their own
[19:53] experience or must we defer to ent to to
[19:57] authority people who decide what is and
[19:59] isn't acceptable and the current
[20:01] backlash that you're seeing with Candace
[20:03] and others and this division among
[20:05] conservative Republicans and MAGA and
[20:07] whatever it is all of this this
[20:10] rebellion against open inquiry reflects
[20:13] a system struggling desperately with
[20:15] that question and it wants obedience
[20:18] without belief and compliance.
[20:20] without understanding.
[20:23] They want you to remain silent without
[20:26] consent. But silence,
[20:29] silence achieved through intimidation
[20:32] doesn't last. It breeds resentment and
[20:35] it sharpens your awareness. All of this
[20:38] makes you smarter. This is why attempts
[20:41] to shame or isolate dissenters like
[20:43] Candace and others backfire all the
[20:46] time. They draw attention. They invite
[20:47] sympathy. and they confirm the suspicion
[20:49] and it it has the the the uh the
[20:52] backwards effect. It elevates her.
[20:54] People now are more fascinated by her
[20:56] because of all the people who say don't
[20:57] listen to her and it and and it and it
[21:00] rekindles the suspicion that something's
[21:02] being hidden. And by the way, each
[21:03] overreaction recruits new skeptics.
[21:07] That's why you're probably here. You're
[21:09] probably here because you're thinking
[21:12] what's going on here.
[21:14] You know something's wrong but you want
[21:16] to be know you you want to know what it
[21:17] is. And there's also a recurring theme
[21:19] of inevitability in this worldview. The
[21:22] sense that certain outcomes
[21:25] cannot be prevented only delayed and
[21:28] that control
[21:30] mechanisms are losing effectiveness.
[21:34] Remember history is not linear. It's
[21:36] cyclical. What is it? It doesn't it
[21:39] doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes
[21:42] with moments of consolidation followed
[21:45] by moments of
[21:47] complete rupture.
[21:49] From this perspective, dear friend,
[21:52] the current moment that we're
[21:54] experiencing feels like a transition,
[21:57] not necessarily towards utopia or
[22:00] catastrophe, but towards exposure,
[22:03] enlightenment, towards a reckoning,
[22:06] towards the collapse of narratives in
[22:08] the official story that no longer hold.
[22:11] I love this. And this doesn't mean
[22:13] everything that challenges official
[22:14] accounts is true. Please, we're not
[22:17] saying that. It means that the reflexive
[22:20] automatic patellar dismissal of
[22:22] challenge is no longer credible. And it
[22:24] means that the burden of proof has
[22:26] shifted. Authority now has to earn trust
[22:29] rather than assume it. That's what this
[22:32] is about. And the most the most
[22:35] unsettling implication of this entire
[22:37] framework is that many people sense
[22:41] what's happening. They sense the shift
[22:43] simultaneously not through coordination
[22:46] but through a shared experience. They
[22:48] say are you seeing this? Yeah. And that
[22:51] shared sensing creates resonance and
[22:56] resonance creates momentum and momentum
[22:59] frightens institutions
[23:01] built on inertia and torper. And this
[23:05] kind of a solidified oified oios kind of
[23:09] strict
[23:11] stuck in the mud
[23:13] philosophy. And in the end, this way of
[23:16] thinking is less about specific claims
[23:17] and more about posture. It's about
[23:19] refusing to outsource perception. It's
[23:22] about trusting that questions are not
[23:24] crimes. It's okay to ask. It's okay to
[23:27] disbelieve. It's about recognizing that
[23:29] ridicule is often a mask for weakness.
[23:33] Dear dear friend, dear dear patriot
[23:35] friend, dear dear member of the
[23:37] conspiratorium,
[23:39] I again welcome you. But I want to
[23:41] remind you this is also about hope.
[23:44] Paradoxically, interestingly enough, the
[23:46] chaos and overreach of the current
[23:49] moment brought out by a lot of is always
[23:51] evolving Candace.
[23:54] The overreach of the moment, all of
[23:56] these are seen not as signs of defeat
[23:58] but as signs of exhaustion. and the part
[24:01] of the entrenched power they recognize
[24:03] this. See, when when control becomes
[24:06] obvious, it loses effectiveness. And
[24:08] when manipulation becomes visible, it
[24:11] fails. You're not supposed to see what's
[24:13] happening. It's like slight of hand. If
[24:15] you can see what they're doing, what's
[24:16] the point? And the core message is
[24:18] simple. Even if the implications are
[24:20] vast, pay attention. Notice patterns.
[24:23] Pay attention. Do not be intimidated out
[24:25] of curiosity. Do not accept character
[24:28] attacks. It's okay. Be a conspiracy
[24:31] theorist as substitutes for answers.
[24:34] Fine. It's okay. Understand that
[24:36] pressure often means proximity to
[24:38] something real. You're getting close.
[24:40] You're successively
[24:42] approximating and and approaching the
[24:44] truth. And whether one interprets this
[24:46] in some kind of psychological, political
[24:48] or technological or spiritual or
[24:50] religious terms doesn't matter. The
[24:53] conclusion is the same. A system that
[24:55] cannot tolerate questions is not stable.
[24:59] And a population, us, a population that
[25:02] begins to ask those questions calmly and
[25:05] persistently, ah
[25:08] we are more powerful than it realizes.
[25:11] My friends, this is not a call to panic.
[25:13] It's a call for clarity, limpidity,
[25:16] pelucidity, to patience, to discernment,
[25:19] to the quiet confidence that comes from
[25:21] understanding that awareness itself
[25:24] changes the game. And once
[25:29] once that awareness spreads,
[25:32] no amount of noise can fully contain it.
[25:35] We are on fire, my friends. I want you
[25:37] to understand this. Do not let this
[25:39] moment go without recognizing these
[25:40] facts. This is monumental. This is
[25:43] seismic.
[25:45] This is a red pill moment for many of
[25:47] you and I welcome you. Join the
[25:50] conspiratorium. Join your brothers and
[25:52] sisters in truth, in curiosity, in
[25:55] incredul.
[25:57] Let me thank you. As I always tell you,
[25:59] for years I I never looked at any of the
[26:02] comments because they're brutal. But
[26:04] your your comments have been so great,
[26:06] so kind, and so beautiful and generous.
[26:09] I can't thank you enough. I I can't and
[26:11] I mean that. So, I ask you to comment. I
[26:14] appreciate that immensely. By the way,
[26:16] you've been so great in following my
[26:17] wife at Lynn's Warriors in her
[26:20] inddehaticable quest to to quash and
[26:23] destroy child predation, human
[26:25] trafficking at Lynn's Warriors. I thank
[26:28] you for that. That's our battle, too, in
[26:31] addition to everything that's going on
[26:32] right now. So, what I want you to do is
[26:33] simply this. First, accept my thanks.
[26:36] Number two, like this video. You know
[26:37] how that works. Subscribe to the
[26:40] channel. Subscribe. get those metrics
[26:42] up. Put us in the HOV lane and also hit
[26:46] that little bell so you're notified of
[26:47] live streams and new videos. And I've
[26:49] got some questions in the comment
[26:50] section which I will put up for you to
[26:52] to review. Talk about them. Let's let's
[26:55] talk. Let's let's exchange. Let's take
[26:58] this conversation momentum and continue
[27:01] it.
[27:03] And let's not remember or forget I
[27:06] should say Candace Owens is in the
[27:08] crosshairs. She needs it and needs us, I
[27:11] should say. And we're there in truth.
[27:14] Okay, good. Now, do me a favor, my
[27:17] friend. Comment as you see fit.
