DNA on Tyler Robinsn's gun belongs to who???

[00:00] Welcome back for another episode of

[00:01] Patriotic Housewife. I hope everyone is

[00:03] having a great evening. Well, Stu Peters

[00:07] just dropped a bomb in his Stu Peters

[00:08] Network show and we are just going to go

[00:10] over a clip of him discussing how the

[00:14] DNA does not match Tyler Robinson that

[00:17] was found on the gun from September 9th

[00:19] in the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

[00:21] So, let's just roll on into that because

[00:25] that is wild if in fact true.

[00:32] an island. You're not taking these

[00:33] arrows alone.

[00:35] SPNstore.com for the mug. Stew

[00:37] peters.tv. $14 off your right now. Be I

[00:41] mean the assassination of Charlie Kirk

[00:42] brass tax here undoubtedly is the most

[00:45] consequential most public political

[00:47] assassination of our lifetimes. Unless

[00:49] you were alive for the killing of JFK.

[00:52] But even if he were, it's not the same

[00:53] because Charlie Kirk was executed on a

[00:55] live stream in front of millions of

[00:57] viewers. And by the time that day ended

[01:00] on 91025, billions of people had seen

[01:02] that footage. With Kennedy, it took

[01:04] decades to get the Zruder film in front

[01:06] of a national audience. With Charlie

[01:07] Kirk, all of this happened in real time.

[01:11] And the footage is crystal clear.

[01:14] So yeah, this should be a massively

[01:16] high-profile case, but it's not. Instead

[01:18] of watching the trial of a century play

[01:20] out in Utah on national or even

[01:22] international television networks,

[01:25] instead of seeing the federal government

[01:27] blasting us with assloads of evidence

[01:29] that undoubtedly convicts Tyler Robinson

[01:31] in both a court of law and the court of

[01:33] public opinion, the average American

[01:35] citizen, for the most part, is just

[01:37] being completely kept in the dark here.

[01:38] But of course, all of that is by design.

[01:42] There's been a few updates on the Fox

[01:44] News Channel and a couple of other

[01:45] corporate outlets, but as far as really

[01:46] digging into whatever's actually

[01:48] happening in that courtroom,

[01:51] like the pre-trial hearings and the

[01:53] proceedings that are playing out right

[01:54] now, today, and throughout this week,

[01:57] your average cable news consumer is

[01:59] getting nothing.

[02:01] Erica Kirk, we talked about her attempts

[02:03] to ram this case, which for the record

[02:05] is a death penalty case, through these

[02:08] courts as quickly as humanly possible.

[02:11] The grieving widow with the help of her

[02:13] Florida based white collar tax evasion

[02:15] attorney that's linked Jeffrey Epstein

[02:18] filed a motion on January 16th invoking

[02:21] what she claims to be her right as the

[02:23] self-proclaimed victim of this crime to

[02:26] a speedy trial.

[02:29] She wants to execute this guy right now.

[02:32] She forgave him, but she wants him dead.

[02:35] According to the grieving widow and

[02:36] Jeffrey Epstein's buddy, the United

[02:39] States Constitution gives her that

[02:40] right. When in reality, it does the

[02:42] exact opposite. The US Constitution

[02:44] actually gives the defendant the right

[02:45] to a speedy trial. But that doesn't

[02:47] matter to Erica Kirk or the FBI or the

[02:50] DOJ or Turning Point USA. What matters

[02:53] to these people is cementing the

[02:56] narrative that Tyler Robinson killed

[02:57] Charlie Kirk.

[02:59] They want to write this in stone that

[03:01] some transchasing furryloving weirdo who

[03:04] looks like he couldn't fight his way out

[03:05] of a wet paper bag scaled the side of a

[03:08] building like Spider-Man undetected

[03:10] around thousands of people in broad

[03:12] daylight took up that position on top of

[03:15] the roof with his grandfather's 30 6 and

[03:18] shot Charlie Kirk in the neck from over

[03:20] 140 yards away leaving no exit wound

[03:22] before rapidly escaping with a rifle

[03:24] shoved down his pants and making off

[03:27] into the woods where he left the murder

[03:28] weapon wrapped in a towel and a neat

[03:30] little stack of physical evidence for

[03:32] investigators to stumble upon

[03:35] before writing in paragraph form a full

[03:38] confession text to his trans lover,

[03:41] going to a Dairy Queen for a hot eat and

[03:43] a cool treat, going on to confess to his

[03:46] father and a pastor and a US marshal and

[03:49] ultimately to the local sheriff when he

[03:51] turned himself in. Footage of which

[03:53] doesn't exist, by the way. Now,

[03:54] obviously, there are a lot of problems

[03:57] with everything that I just ran through,

[03:58] and that's just surface level.

[04:01] But what I want to focus on this evening

[04:03] is the so-called murder weapon and the

[04:05] pile of so-called evidence that

[04:07] investigators pulled out of the woods.

[04:08] Now, look, we already know that Charlie

[04:10] Kirk wasn't shot in the neck with a 306.

[04:12] That just didn't happen.

[04:15] And something else that didn't happen is

[04:17] that Tyler Robinson didn't leave a pile

[04:19] of evidence in the woods. And I'm not

[04:20] just saying that because it's my opinion

[04:22] or because I just feel like it. I'm

[04:25] saying it because it's true. In fact,

[04:27] it's already come out in court.

[04:30] You may not have heard because nobody's

[04:32] really talking about it, but during a

[04:34] pre-trial hearing just yesterday, new

[04:37] information was revealed proving exactly

[04:39] what I just said and a whole lot more.

[04:40] There are some serious problems with

[04:42] this case. And one of those problems is

[04:45] the fact that the so-called murder

[04:47] weapon that investigators found in the

[04:49] woods contains the DNA of at least five

[04:52] people.

[04:54] Yes, five people. You heard that right.

[04:56] The

[04:56] >> You guys heard that right. Five people,

[04:59] which they're trying, I think, to pull

[05:01] down and allegedly newspaper articles

[05:04] and certain things that have come out

[05:06] online because they don't want this to

[05:08] look verifiable. They're trying to uh

[05:10] not make court dates. Um, I want to

[05:13] [clears throat] say they're not making

[05:14] them like public record, but they're

[05:16] they're trying to keep them to where you

[05:18] don't even know a court hearing is going

[05:19] to happen. Um, and now they're going to

[05:22] be doing a few of them. I think in the

[05:24] future it's looking like they're going

[05:25] to be like Zoom. Um, I really believe

[05:28] that they are trying to keep people from

[05:30] watching these live hearings, attending

[05:33] actual court hearings and so on. They do

[05:36] not want people around this case. It is

[05:39] really, really crazy. And you have to

[05:41] ask yourself why. Why

[05:45] >> rifle that we are told Tyler Robinson

[05:47] used to shoot Charlie Kirk in the neck

[05:50] only for the bullet of course to be

[05:52] caught by Charlie's Superman like Bones

[05:54] of Steel

[05:57] is riddled with the DNA of people who

[05:59] aren't Tyler Robinson.

[06:03] >> Sorry guys, the wind here is kind of

[06:05] crazy. At least five different people

[06:07] had their hands and their DNA

[06:11] all over this weapon.

[06:14] And again, this was revealed in open

[06:17] court on video.

[06:19] This is information that Turning Point

[06:21] USA and the Fox News Channel and the

[06:23] rest of them don't want you to know. But

[06:24] watch this.

[06:25] >> You said there was evidence uh the DNA

[06:28] um was evidence consistent or DNA

[06:30] consistent with the defendant's DNA

[06:31] found on that rifle.

[06:32] >> Check to hearay.

[06:34] council.

[06:35] >> Uh, this is this this really ought to be

[06:37] considered under kind of a 104 a 104.

[06:40] >> Hold on, guys. Let me try to

[06:42] >> rule of evidence here. We're not

[06:44] offering the admission of this to prove

[06:45] guilty.

[06:46] >> One second. I'm going to make this

[06:48] smaller because I think it's this volume

[06:52] is why we can't hear as well. No, that's

[06:55] fully on. whether or not uh there's a

[06:57] conflict of interest, the val the

[06:59] existence of other evidence besides the

[07:02] uh adult child in this case is relevant

[07:05] to whether or not she is she is a

[07:07] material witness. If we've got DNA

[07:09] proving or suggesting or proving

[07:11] otherwise, it's it's directly relevant

[07:14] to that.

[07:16] And under 104 that the court can

[07:18] consider it.

[07:18] >> Oh, wait. You guys could hear the whole

[07:20] time. Okay. Sorry. Sorry, guys.

[07:23] >> All right. And Miss Nester, anything

[07:25] further?

[07:26] >> No, sir.

[07:26] >> All right. Based off so I will overrule

[07:29] the objection based off rule 104 and as

[07:32] it relates only to this hearing today.

[07:35] >> Understood.

[07:36] >> Sorry. Could you repeat a question?

[07:37] >> DNA. Is is DNA consistent with the

[07:40] defendant's DNA found on the firearm

[07:42] that was found at the scene?

[07:44] >> Yes, the DNA on the firearm was

[07:45] consistent with that of Mr. Robinson.

[07:47] >> You mentioned the DNA evidence. You're

[07:49] certainly not a DNA expert. Is that

[07:51] correct?

[07:53] I'm not now.

[07:54] >> And are you aware that DN the DNA

[07:57] evidence that was seized from the scene

[07:58] consisted of a mixture of at least five

[08:00] different individuals?

[08:02] >> I'm not a DNA expert. So

[08:05] >> So you know enough to say what helps

[08:06] him, but you're not going to answer

[08:08] whether or not there were five

[08:09] individuals mixed into that DNA.

[08:10] >> I'm not aware of that. No.

[08:12] >> Okay. And you're certainly not qualified

[08:14] to interpret complex DNA mixtures, are

[08:16] you?

[08:17] >> No, I'm not.

[08:17] >> Okay.

[08:18] >> Okay. What you just saw there is a

[08:20] federal agent, obviously of foreign

[08:22] origin, being put on the spot and

[08:25] refusing to answer that question because

[08:27] he would have to admit that the murder

[08:29] weapon is no more linked to Tyler

[08:32] Robinson than it is to everyone else

[08:34] whose DNA was found on it. I mean, this

[08:37] is huge.

[08:39] This should be reported on by every news

[08:42] agency out there if they're actually

[08:43] serious about reporting the news, but

[08:45] they're not, of course, we know that.

[08:46] So, they're pretending that that

[08:48] exchange never even happened.

[08:51] The big lynch pin in this entire case is

[08:54] the murder weapon,

[08:56] and it's that the murder weapon is a

[08:58] rifle that belongs to Tyler Robinson's

[09:01] grandfather that Tyler Robinson stole

[09:03] and used to kill Charlie Kirk.

[09:06] And the secondary lynch pin is the

[09:08] so-called confession text that the FBI

[09:10] claims Tyler Robinson wrote to his trans

[09:12] lover, which reads like it was written

[09:14] by ChatGpt or by some boomer cop

[09:16] somewhere.

[09:18] The evidence is all bullshit.

[09:22] And by the way, who does the DNA on that

[09:24] rifle belong to? Are they ever going to

[09:27] tell us

[09:29] or are they just going to act like what

[09:30] we just saw with

[09:31] >> Well, they really should tell us. That's

[09:33] the thing. So they really should tell us

[09:35] who the DNA belongs to and who the five

[09:38] people are

[09:41] that that I mean we have to know who the

[09:43] DNA is from. That would be but in this

[09:46] case they're they haven't been honest

[09:47] about anything so who knows if we'll

[09:49] even really get that but yeah we should

[09:51] know

[09:51] >> with our own eyes and heard with our own

[09:53] ears never happened.

[09:56] Definitely the latter because Tyler

[09:57] Robinson is being railroaded and the

[09:59] general public is being gaslit into

[10:01] believing that anyone who questions the

[10:04] process here. Anyone who questions what

[10:08] evidence the government has in this case

[10:11] is quickly shot down as a conspiracy

[10:13] theorist or as someone who's being mean

[10:15] to a grieving widow like Erica Kirk.

[10:19] And there's some more information that

[10:21] came out of yesterday's hearing that we

[10:22] need to address. Now, we have talked

[10:24] here before about the fact that one of

[10:26] Utah County's top prosecutors in this

[10:28] case has a child who was at the scene of

[10:31] Charlie Kirk's assassination.

[10:34] Well, we can now confirm that that

[10:36] attorney is Chad Grander. And yesterday,

[10:39] the Utah County Attorney, Jeffrey Gray,

[10:42] Grander's boss, took to the stand in

[10:45] Robinson's pre-trial hearing and claimed

[10:47] that despite Granander's kid being an

[10:49] eyewitness, there's no conflict of

[10:52] interest.

[10:53] Grander is going to stay on the case.

[10:55] Watch this.

[10:56] >> Prosecutor A uh received a me, you were

[10:59] with prosecutor A and prosecutor A

[11:01] received a message from his child um

[11:04] that uh Charlie Kirk had been shot.

[11:06] >> Yes. Is that right? Um, and then you

[11:08] testified that prosecutor A left to go

[11:11] to um, uh, the scene. Do you know why

[11:16] prosecutor A left? Was it to go to the

[11:18] scene and help law enforcement or to be

[11:21] with his child?

[11:22] >> To assist in any way we can with law

[11:24] enforcement.

[11:27] Um,

[11:35] you previously testified that you did

[11:37] not consult the attorney general's

[11:38] office about whether or not this was a

[11:40] conflict of interest that would require

[11:42] your office uh to leave the case or to

[11:44] refer the case. Um, why did you not

[11:47] consult the attorney general's office?

[11:49] because what they would have done is,

[11:53] you know, researched it and and then

[11:55] come back and I've done that for, you

[11:59] know, over 30 years in my my practice.

[12:01] I'm capable of doing that.

[12:03] >> And researched it where

[12:05] >> um case law and so forth. Again, I mean,

[12:09] this we I do not believe that there's

[12:11] any conflict whatsoever. I made that

[12:13] conclusion. I I stand by that. Um and

[12:19] uh I [clears throat] mean out of an

[12:20] abundance of caution, we certainly uh

[12:23] notified council um out of an abundance

[12:27] of caution and I think that's the

[12:29] appropriate action to take. Um so again,

[12:33] I understand [clears throat] what

[12:34] conflict the concern about conflict is

[12:36] whether or not it's it has any

[12:39] possibility of affecting your decision

[12:41] making as a prosecutor. And I didn't see

[12:45] how this does in any way.

[12:47] >> Okay, if I can have Justin.

[12:49] >> Okay, so Chad Gernander

[12:51] went to the scene of the murder

[12:53] immediately after Charlie Kirk was

[12:55] killed.

[12:57] And what you heard his boss say there,

[12:58] they claim that that was because of some

[13:00] sort of perceived law enforcement duties

[13:02] that this attorney had involving the

[13:05] murder.

[13:06] This was under the opices of his law

[13:08] enforcement authority that he was there.

[13:10] Well, in the same breath, they say that

[13:12] it was because his kid sent him a

[13:13] message saying that Charlie Kirk was

[13:16] killed.

[13:17] So, which one is it? H

[13:21] Which time were you lying?

[13:27] And then there's a third factor here.

[13:29] There's an additional factor at play

[13:31] because just a couple of days after

[13:32] Grunander's tour at Utah Valley

[13:34] University,

[13:36] the grass that Charlie Kirk was sitting

[13:38] on top of when he was killed, which by

[13:40] the way was still soaked in his blood,

[13:43] was ripped up and paved over.

[13:47] We have a source inside of Utah Valley

[13:49] University that works in facilities

[13:50] there. There were pictures taken of the

[13:53] workers, their forearms.

[13:58] We'll let this last couple minutes play

[14:01] out, guys, and then we'll skip out of

[14:03] the rest of this. But he's going to talk

[14:04] about the workers that were there that

[14:06] day. I did do a previous video on this,

[14:08] but we'll listen to this part again just

[14:10] to just to listen.

[14:12] >> Had Charlie's wet blood on them.

[14:16] The crime scene was then completely

[14:18] destroyed. It's gone. It doesn't exist

[14:21] anymore. Is there a connection here?

[14:24] was surveying that area and identifying

[14:27] whatever it was that needed to be

[14:28] altered to shove the official story down

[14:31] America's collective throat. Was that

[14:32] part of his law enforcement duty on that

[14:34] day?

[14:35] >> Yeah, I think that was part of law

[14:37] enforcement duty that day. Stu, I do.

[14:40] And they're going to continue doing that

[14:42] except now not them, but the FBI

[14:44] director to be to be clear and TPUSA

[14:48] that you can't question the narrative.

[14:50] This is what they told us. This is what

[14:52] it is. and you are too stupid. Count on

[14:54] us. We will tell you what to think and

[14:56] do. Don't worry about it. We got you.

[15:00] So, yeah, we have more than one person's

[15:03] DNA and this weapon allegedly.

[15:06] Obviously, it could be the grandpa. It

[15:08] could be Tyler Robinson, but then who

[15:10] are the other three uh traces of DNA?

[15:15] And I think it's really wild that the

[15:18] prosecution team can say that it's okay

[15:21] for him to stay as a part of the

[15:23] prosecution being that his child was 80

[15:26] ft from Charlie Kirk getting shot. And

[15:29] she is saying that allegedly she rotated

[15:32] her head as the shot rang out so she did

[15:34] not see it. And also that she has no

[15:37] trauma from it. She never saw a

[15:39] therapist. They just moved on like

[15:41] nothing ever happened as a family. It is

[15:44] a-ok. okay and she's okay. We She don't

[15:47] need anything and she didn't see

[15:49] anything. Even though he was texting

[15:52] with his fellow colleagues about his

[15:56] daughter being there and what she seen

[15:59] and what went on at UVU, I would say

[16:01] that's conflict of interest. I also want

[16:03] to talk about the conflict of interest

[16:05] that was talked about about the defense

[16:07] team and someone being related to a

[16:10] Farnsworth.

[16:12] We have a lot of conflict of interest

[16:14] here on both sides here. I really want

[16:19] someone to be able to tell me how we are

[16:21] going to actually have a fair trial for

[16:23] Tyler Robinson.

[16:26] Actually, I want to know even more than

[16:27] that. I want to know

[16:29] at what point are we going to stop

[16:33] what's going on here because we have a

[16:36] innocent life on the line here. And

[16:39] while I don't think Tyler Robinson

[16:42] didn't participate at all, I'm pretty

[16:44] sure he was a psywhere

[16:47] and had no idea probably what he was

[16:48] really getting himself into. And now he

[16:50] is in a pile of crap up to his eyeballs

[16:55] and

[16:57] he is stuck. Now they won't even allow

[17:01] him in the courtroom because they don't

[17:03] want any lip reading going on and every

[17:04] other thing that's been happening.

[17:07] Um, but still,

[17:10] at what point are we going to say, "Hey,

[17:14] he didn't take this gun and fire this

[17:18] shot that killed Charlie."

[17:21] And if Charlie wasn't killed with 30 at

[17:24] six, which is what we all think, then I

[17:28] would say that's enough reasonable

[17:29] doubt. What are you going to get him on?

[17:31] That right there should kill the case

[17:34] because the injuries aren't consistent

[17:36] with what they're saying happened on

[17:38] September 10th. So, there is no case.

[17:42] And I'm not sure with the chain of

[17:44] custodies and everything else we have

[17:45] going on here, how we are even standing

[17:48] in a courtroom right now to be honest

[17:49] with you with someone charged

[17:52] because everybody walked all over the

[17:54] crime scene. People were helping pick

[17:56] things up right after you saw that all

[17:57] over the news. Start start YouTube

[17:59] googling all the footage from that Dan

[18:02] on on news stations. You see people

[18:04] picking up trash. People are looking for

[18:05] stuff. They're going back for things.

[18:07] They're taking tents down. I mean, the

[18:09] whole place was fingerprinted up. You

[18:10] got Terrell taking the SD cards down,

[18:12] standing on the chair, you know, moving

[18:15] things or putting stuff on the table.

[18:17] Nobody would treat a crime scene like

[18:18] that. So, I just I don't understand how

[18:22] any of this is going to really super

[18:25] track

[18:28] just me. But I just wanted to share this

[18:29] part from Stu because it is crazy that

[18:33] we have possibly allegedly I'm going to

[18:36] say allegedly because these people like

[18:38] to sue

[18:40] five different DNAs on this weapon.

[18:45] Mhm. And we have a weapon

[18:50] that is not going to be consistent with

[18:53] the injuries we saw on Charlie.

[18:57] We have a defense team with a conflict

[19:00] of interest. We have a prosecution team

[19:02] with a conflict of interest.

[19:07] I mean, what else?

[19:11] I mean, yeah, nothing to see here at all

[19:13] whatsoever. Nothing to worry about

[19:15] either. There's nothing fishy about any

[19:16] of this. Like, let's just keep moving.

[19:19] As Eric Kirk says, business as usual.

[19:21] Like, we're full steam ahead. What are

[19:23] we even doing? Let's full steam ahead.

[19:26] Let's just keep going. Let's just put

[19:27] this kid to death and call it a day.

[19:30] She's forgiven a killer that she doesn't

[19:32] even know is guilty yet because it's

[19:35] innocent until proven guilty,

[19:38] but she's rushing that trial now.

[19:42] Rushing the trial for the dead victim.

[19:46] What? Like I I just can't I can't with

[19:49] these people anymore. It every day I

[19:52] just get more and more sick over it. So

[19:54] yeah, and I don't want to annoy you guys

[19:55] too much with it. Anyway, please like,

[19:58] comment, share, subscribe. I appreciate

[19:59] you guys. I hope you guys enjoyed the

[20:01] video. We will be going over more of

[20:04] some of this stuff throughout the next

[20:06] couple weeks as things come out and go

[20:07] on. And I love Stu, so I will be going

[20:10] over his shows. He does great work. Um,

[20:13] and I just I really like to uh do

[20:15] overviews of his stuff, especially with

[20:16] this case. He's on top of it. And uh

[20:20] yeah, there's going to be there's going

[20:21] to be a lot more the next I think the

[20:23] next couple months are going to be very

[20:24] busy. And so um I think we're all

[20:27] feeling a little bit of exhaustion, but

[20:29] we're just going to keep on keep on

[20:31] rolling full steam ahead as Eric Kirk

[20:33] would say. I will see you guys all in

[20:35] the next one.