Up Next
Jim Spiewak Interviews Four Witnesses to the Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University
20:25
Dave Rubin on Charlie Kirk's Murder: Honoring a Friend Who Bridged Political Divides
11:22
Congressional Tribute to Charlie Kirk After Tragic Death Delivered on House Floor by Mike Johnson
7:17
Author and commentator Douglas Murray sat down for an interview hours after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, describing the loss of one of the brightest and bravest voices of his generation — a genuinely decent man, a father of two, shot dead at 31 at the kind of event that had become synonymous with his name.
A Voice for Dialogue in a Violent Age
Murray reflected on what had made Charlie Kirk genuinely distinctive: from the moment he founded Turning Point USA at around the age of 18, Kirk had consistently argued that robust dialogue across ideological lines was the most important safeguard against political violence. "When people stop talking, really bad stuff starts," Kirk said in a clip replayed at the start of the interview. "When civilizations stop talking, civil war ensues. What we as a culture have to get back to is being able to have reasonable disagreement where violence is not an option."
Murray noted that this message — one Kirk repeated constantly throughout his adult life — was routinely ignored by his critics, most of whom, Murray suspected, never actually listened to anything Kirk said. Instead, they demonised him, misrepresented him, and treated political opponents not merely as wrong, but as evil. Most conservatives, Murray observed, tend to think the left is wrong — not evil. That courtesy is rarely returned.
MSNBC's Shameful Response
The interview addressed the media's conduct in the hours after the shooting. A clip from MSNBC featured commentator Matthew Dowd suggesting that Kirk had been one of the most divisive younger figures in recent political life, pushing what Dow described as hate speech, and drawing a line between hateful thoughts, hateful words, and hateful actions — in effect, framing Kirk's murder through the lens of Kirk's supposed culpability.
Murray's response was precise. He pointed out the obvious rhetorical incoherence: if that logic holds, what would Dow say if someone directed hateful thoughts about him toward violence? He described the segment as absolutely shameful — an example of smearing the recently dead — and said that if MSNBC had any integrity they would have corrected Dow on air immediately.
"Words are not violence," Murray said. "Shooting somebody in the throat is violence. And I really hope that people who have been demonising and dehumanising their opponents think about the fruits of their own words."
What Charlie Kirk Actually Said
Murray addressed the substance of Kirk's positions, which Dow and others treated as extreme. Kirk had argued that there are two biological sexes. He had argued that America is a tremendous country worthy of pride. He had argued for biblical and Judeo-Christian values. None of these positions were remotely controversial until very recently. None of them were hateful. They were statements of fact or sincerely held opinion — things that used to be not only permitted in America, but respected.
What was truly notable about Charlie Kirk, Murray observed, was that he always made his arguments politely — even in the face of unhinged, ugly abuse. Video after video showed Kirk calmly and patiently dismantling radical arguments while being screamed at. And they still shot him. No matter how much he preached dialogue and decency, it did not protect him.
Spread the Risk
Murray's closing message was a call to courage. In the wake of an act designed to intimidate and silence conservative voices, the temptation is to pipe down and avoid making oneself a target. Murray argued that this would be exactly the wrong response. He referenced Ayaan Hirsi Ali's words after the Charlie Hebdo attack: the best response is to spread the risk. If those inclined toward political violence believe they can target conservative voices one by one, the answer is for everyone to speak up more, not less.
Murray urged Kirk's admirers — particularly young men and women across America and the wider West who had been educated and inspired by him — to pick up where he left off. Not by sinking to the level of their opponents, but by emulating Kirk's courtesy, patriotism, and decency. "What Charlie said right up until the moment he was shot remains as true now as it always was," Murray concluded. "We need to be able to talk. We need to explore ideas across divides. And if we lose that, people resort to violence."
Video Transcript
[00:00] Joining me now is the author of
[00:02] groundbreaking works, international
[00:04] bestsellers, his latest on democracies
[00:07] and death cults, Douglas Murray. Let's
[00:10] start with the murder of Charlie Kirk.
[00:13] One of the brightest and bravest voices
[00:16] of his generation, a genuinely decent
[00:19] man, a father of two, shot dead at the
[00:22] age of 31 at the type of event that had
[00:25] really become synonymous with his name.
[00:28] He understood the importance of robust
[00:31] debate, of maintaining dialogue with
[00:34] your ideological opponents.
[00:36] >> When people stop talking, really bad
[00:39] stuff starts. When marriages stop
[00:41] talking, divorce happens. When
[00:42] civilizations stop talking, civil war
[00:44] ensues. When you stop having a human
[00:46] connection with someone you disagree
[00:48] with, it becomes a lot easier to want to
[00:50] commit violence against that group. What
[00:52] we as a culture have to get back to is
[00:54] being able to have reasonable
[00:55] disagreement where violence is not an
[00:57] option.
[00:59] Douglas, this is a heartbreaking,
[01:03] unimaginable loss.
[01:06] >> Yeah, we're we're speaking just a few
[01:08] hours after the murder of Charlie Kirk.
[01:11] Um, and I like everyone, my thoughts are
[01:14] with Charlie, but also his wife, his
[01:16] young wife, and his two young children
[01:18] that he leaves behind. Um it's uh an
[01:21] extraordinary appalling
[01:24] act of violence and uh it's I wish I
[01:28] could say that it's completely uns
[01:30] completely surprising but but it isn't
[01:33] because of course we've had
[01:35] assassination attempts on President
[01:38] Trump who Charlie Kirk has been a very
[01:40] vocal supporter and ally of for many
[01:42] years now and there have been many
[01:44] threats uh over the years against
[01:47] Charlie himself. Uh what we just heard
[01:50] him saying in that video is something
[01:52] that Charlie said often and it's
[01:54] completely true. Uh he spent a lot of
[01:57] his energies uh since he first came onto
[01:59] the scene at the young age of about 18
[02:02] or so and founded Turning Point. Since
[02:05] then he he he he had always uh made an
[02:09] effort to stress this point that yes,
[02:12] you need to be able to talk. you need to
[02:15] have differences of opinion out in the
[02:18] public square and that it is the best
[02:22] way to avoid a descent into political
[02:25] violence. And although he made that
[02:27] point so often, so many of his critics,
[02:31] >> most of whom I suspect really never
[02:33] listened to anything that Charlie said,
[02:36] um, demonized him, misrepresented him,
[02:40] and did that classic thing that
[02:42] unfortunately uh, uh, so much of the
[02:45] left does, which is to regard their
[02:49] political opponents not just as wrong,
[02:52] but as evil. And this is something that
[02:56] many of us have pointed out over the
[02:58] years. Uh most conservatives tend to
[03:00] think that the left is wrong. Uh but not
[03:04] that it is certainly not in its entirety
[03:06] evil. Um but that favor is not returned
[03:10] the other way around. And so we have uh
[03:14] people routinely claiming that
[03:17] mainstream conservative voices like
[03:20] Charlie Kirks are somehow extreme. uh
[03:24] and that they somehow themselves are
[03:27] causing harm. Think of all the people in
[03:30] recent years who Charlie has talked
[03:32] about
[03:33] >> uh who you and I Rita have talked about
[03:35] >> who have said that words are violence
[03:38] and that countering ideas or questioning
[03:41] ideas uh is literally killing people and
[03:45] much more. Well, here we see once again
[03:49] uh the reality of it. Uh uh words are
[03:52] not violence. Um shooting somebody in
[03:56] the throat is violence. And I really
[03:59] hope that a moment like this as well as
[04:02] thinking of Charlie and his family,
[04:05] people think uh if they're on the side
[04:09] that has been demonizing
[04:11] uh their opponents to such an extent and
[04:13] dehumanizing them, I hope they think
[04:16] themselves about the fruits of their
[04:19] their own words.
[04:24] >> And Charlie was rare. He he had the
[04:28] ability to persuade so many from across
[04:31] the political divide. That's rare these
[04:34] days. It it made him enormously
[04:37] influential,
[04:38] particularly along amongst young men.
[04:41] And Douglas, it was such a wholesome
[04:44] message at its heart. It was about
[04:46] prioritizing family and religion and
[04:49] truth.
[04:50] >> And you spoke about the hate he
[04:52] received. It was so unhinged, so ugly, a
[04:57] lot of it from media, and it continued
[05:01] even after he was shot. Let me play you
[05:04] a little of the discussion on MSNBC
[05:06] earlier today.
[05:08] >> He's been one of the most divisive,
[05:10] especially divisive, younger figures in
[05:12] this who is constantly sort of pushing
[05:15] this sort of hate speech or sort of
[05:18] aimed at certain groups. And I always go
[05:20] back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful
[05:24] words which then lead to hateful
[05:27] actions.
[05:32] >> I'm not going to say what I want to say.
[05:34] What's your response, Douglas, to what
[05:37] you just heard? That was Matthew Dow on
[05:39] MSNBC earlier.
[05:42] Well, I mean, uh, the obvious thing is
[05:44] to make a rhetorical point about what
[05:46] Dow said there, which is what if
[05:49] somebody had hateful thoughts about him?
[05:52] Um, what if, uh, his hateful words that
[05:55] he said just there led to somebody
[05:58] shooting him or a loved one of his or a
[06:00] friend of his in the throat? Would he
[06:03] exercise the same attempt at logical
[06:06] consistency then? I would think not,
[06:09] probably. Um but yes, that is an
[06:12] absolutely classic example of smearing
[06:16] uh the only just dead. Um and uh what
[06:21] Matthew Dow said there is completely
[06:23] shameful and if N MSNBC had any shame,
[06:27] they would have said that immediately to
[06:29] him and taken him off the air. uh what
[06:34] Charlie Kirk argued for uh throughout
[06:38] his public life, which was effectively
[06:39] throughout his adult life, were very
[06:42] straightforward things that were not
[06:44] controversial until very very recently.
[06:47] For instance, what this ignoramus dowed
[06:51] uh thinks is controversial, if he if he
[06:53] bothered ever to listen to anything that
[06:55] Charlie Ko said, and I I doubt he did
[06:57] before deciding to smear him before his
[06:59] corpse is cold. Um what what Charlie
[07:03] Kirk said were things like there are two
[07:06] sexes. There are men and there are
[07:08] women.
[07:09] >> He said America is a tremendous country
[07:11] and he was enormously proud of it and an
[07:14] extraordinary patriot. That wasn't
[07:17] neither of these things were
[07:19] controversial until very very recently.
[07:22] Um Charlie Kirk argued for biblical
[07:26] values for Judeo-Christian values. that
[07:29] wasn't controversial until extremely
[07:32] recently. Um, none of what Charlie Kirk
[07:36] argued for was in any way hateful. Um,
[07:39] and uh, I'm I wish, as I say, that
[07:42] people like Dowed, MSNBC,
[07:46] and many others realize that the hate
[07:49] has been so disproportionately coming
[07:52] from them. It's them who say who who say
[07:56] that saying that uh America is a good
[07:59] country is somehow hateful. It's them
[08:02] that says that saying that there are two
[08:03] biological sexes is somehow hateful. No,
[08:06] it isn't. None of that was ever hateful.
[08:09] It was a it was a statement of fact or
[08:12] of opinion. And that used to be allowed
[08:15] in America and that used to be respected
[08:17] in America. And it's a terrible,
[08:20] terrible demonstration of where America
[08:23] and the West has come to that the
[08:25] statement of obvious truths and the
[08:28] statement of opinions that millions and
[08:31] millions of people hold fast to should
[08:35] be smeared in this way.
[08:40] >> Uh Doubt said plenty more and there's
[08:42] been other media outlets who've
[08:44] disgraced themselves today. Uh ju just
[08:46] to clarify he made those comments after
[08:49] Charlie was shot but before his death
[08:51] was announced but shameful in at any
[08:54] time to be saying that to be blaming the
[08:57] victim for speaking the truth. Ch
[09:00] Douglas, the next generation of young
[09:03] men in particular are becoming
[09:05] increasingly conservative, increasingly
[09:08] right-wing, rejecting so much of the
[09:11] leftist ideology that's been shoved down
[09:14] their throats by the culture, by schools
[09:16] and universities.
[09:18] And like yourself, Charlie Kirk has
[09:21] played a significant role in that in
[09:23] opening the eyes of so many young
[09:26] Americans, young people across the West,
[09:29] a uh making them unafraid to speak,
[09:33] making them uh say their opinions boldly
[09:37] and putting forward an alternative view
[09:39] to the prevailing dogma. And Douglas, he
[09:43] always did it
[09:44] >> so politely, even in the face of
[09:47] terrible abuse. I used to play his
[09:49] videos on this program all the time, the
[09:51] interactions where he would cop this
[09:54] ugly, unhinged abuse, and he would
[09:56] always remain calm and politely
[09:58] dismantle the the radical left's
[10:01] arguments in the face of terrible abuse.
[10:04] and they still shot him. No matter how
[10:07] much you spoke about the importance of
[10:09] dialogue, about not demonizing your
[10:11] opponents, about engaging and and making
[10:15] sure that uh we're at a point where we
[10:17] can still talk to each other and they
[10:20] still shot him.
[10:22] >> We'll find out who they is, I suppose,
[10:25] in the the coming uh hours and days. I
[10:29] think that whoever the shooter turns out
[10:33] to be, um I do hope that people who
[10:38] listened uh to Charlie, who were
[10:40] inspired by him, um he he was an
[10:44] extraordinary communicator. I mean his
[10:46] success uh his earned success uh over
[10:50] the years of his adult life came about
[10:54] because he had an enormous skill at
[10:56] speaking to people and for people and uh
[11:00] he was enormously persuasive. He was
[11:03] enormously skilled and talented and as I
[11:06] say it needs to be said again an
[11:08] incredible patriot. Um the I hope that
[11:12] after this there will be many people I
[11:14] suspect particularly young people who um
[11:19] learned a lot from Charlie, admired
[11:21] Charlie and much more who will be um
[11:25] tempted at a moment like this uh to sink
[11:28] to the kind of level that they perceive
[11:31] in their opponents.
[11:34] I think these moments can be real
[11:36] crossroads. And I hope that all of those
[11:41] young men and women across America and
[11:43] elsewhere who were inspired and educated
[11:47] and informed by Charlie uh realize that
[11:51] their task now is to pick up where he
[11:55] left off and to emulate
[11:58] the what he did and to emulate the
[12:02] courtesy, the patriotism, the decency
[12:06] uh that he showed.
[12:08] in his public uh life and that they
[12:12] don't sink into the kind of behavior
[12:16] which they see uh among their opponents.
[12:20] I hope that is the case because you say
[12:22] Rita um Charlie always demonstrated such
[12:26] considerable courtesy and decency uh
[12:29] even to his political opponents who were
[12:32] screaming abuse at him and much more.
[12:35] Um, so it it could be, as I say, this is
[12:38] only hours after this uh terrible news
[12:41] has come through. It could be one of
[12:42] those moments where some people sink
[12:45] down and meet their opponents on their
[12:47] opponent's terms. But it would be a much
[12:50] better thing for America and for all of
[12:53] us, I think, if we rise above that. And
[12:56] remember that what Charlie said and was
[12:58] saying right up until the moment he was
[13:00] shot remains as true now as it was all
[13:05] these years, which is that yes, we need
[13:09] to be able to explore ideas. We need to
[13:11] be able to talk. We need to be able to
[13:13] talk across divides. And that if we lose
[13:16] that then people resort to violence. And
[13:20] um how terrible it is that something
[13:23] that he perceived so clearly and said so
[13:26] often um should be something which has
[13:29] now been proven uh by the
[13:33] the evil person who's taken his life
[13:35] away.
[13:38] >> And he was always so brave. he would you
[13:41] talked about speaking truth and in the
[13:43] past week he has spoken a lot of truth a
[13:47] lot of uncomfortable truths about crime
[13:49] in the US uh particularly after the
[13:52] murder of the Ukrainian uh young
[13:55] Ukrainian woman down in North Carolina
[13:57] and uh the media's reluctance initially
[14:00] to touch that story at all the over
[14:03] representation
[14:04] of a segment of the population in the
[14:06] violent crime stats so many really
[14:09] crucial issues Douglas
[14:11] that should be spoken about. But
[14:14] >> yes,
[14:14] >> the media is is perhaps afraid to so
[14:17] many commentators don't want to be cast
[14:19] as racist or bigots or be called hateful
[14:22] like Charlie was for stating facts for
[14:27] stating facts that may be uncomfortable,
[14:29] but how are you going to ever tackle
[14:31] these issues if you don't actually even
[14:33] acknowledge them?
[14:35] >> Absolutely. Uh, and what happens if you
[14:38] don't acknowledge issues which are
[14:39] staring everyone in the face is you push
[14:42] them down under and they bubble away and
[14:44] and evil things come up. You you you
[14:48] seed uh an evil harvest when you do
[14:51] that. Uh I I I suppose there's one other
[14:54] thing I would say about that which is
[14:56] that after an act of violence like this
[14:58] as well as great anger and great rage
[15:01] which many people will have. Um there
[15:03] will be some people who will feel um in
[15:06] some way um afraid or or cowed by this.
[15:11] They may not admit to it. They may not
[15:13] wish to explore it. But but they it's
[15:15] understandable. Um there was no reason
[15:18] why somebody saying what Charlie Kirk
[15:20] said should ever have been the subject
[15:22] of violence, the object of violence. Um
[15:26] but I hope that people realize again
[15:27] that that although at such a moment they
[15:30] can they might feel it's a good time to
[15:33] pipe down or or not make themselves a
[15:36] target. that actually the much better
[15:38] thing to do is to everyone for everyone
[15:41] uh to be a bit more courageous. For
[15:44] everyone to be a bit stronger in
[15:48] standing up for what they believe to be
[15:50] true, for stating facts that they see
[15:53] before their eyes by uh getting out
[15:56] there, by making their voices heard. You
[16:00] know, I I think often of uh uh after a
[16:04] previous uh assassination a good decade
[16:07] ago and the offices of Charlie Abdo, I
[16:10] remember what my friend Ayan Hers Ali
[16:12] said and perhaps it's as as applicable
[16:14] now as it was then, which is that if
[16:17] there are people uh who seem to be uh in
[16:22] this position that Charlie found himself
[16:25] in of being this object of of hate as as
[16:28] the cartoonists and the editors of
[16:30] Charlie Abdo were a decade ago. I hope
[16:32] that people remember now what Ayan said
[16:35] then which is the best thing is to
[16:38] spread the risk around. Um if people are
[16:43] going to uh believe that it's
[16:45] respectable or reasonable to target
[16:49] conservative voices with violence, let's
[16:51] all speak up a bit more. Uh let's all
[16:54] take a step forward. Uh people don't
[16:56] need to be heroes or or martyrs or
[16:58] anything, but they could be a bit more
[17:00] heroic and uh speak up a bit more and uh
[17:04] be proud a bit more for the things you
[17:07] should feel pride in uh like your
[17:09] nation. And uh if if people do that uh
[17:14] that would be in the midst of this this
[17:17] awful time, it would be a tribute and
[17:20] one which I think Charlie would himself
[17:23] be very proud of. Beautifully
[17:27] said and I think you're so right. Let's
[17:30] step up and spread the risk. Douglas
[17:32] Murray, thank you so much for your time
[17:34] tonight.
[17:35] It's a pleasure.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.