Erika Kirk Reveals the Truth About Charlie Kirk’s Wound

[00:00] I saw the wound that ended his life.

[00:05] I felt everything you would expect to

[00:07] feel. If there's a conspiracy involving

[00:11] Charlie Kirk's assassination, if it

[00:13] involves another shooter, and if the

[00:16] mainstream narrative is different to

[00:18] what actually happened, then why is

[00:20] Charlie Kirk's own widow not talking

[00:23] about this? She saw the wound. So, do

[00:25] you think you know better than her or

[00:27] does she know better than you?

[00:30] I got nightmares in my head. I feel

[00:38] my mind feels like a creature and it

[00:41] haunts me so much.

[00:44] I got nightmares.

[00:52] But there was something else too. Even

[00:54] in death, I could see the man that I

[00:57] love.

[00:59] I saw the one single gray hair

[01:04] on the side of his head, which I never

[01:06] told him about.

[01:08] Now he knows.

[01:10] >> Erica Kirk was sitting in her mother's

[01:12] hospital room at 11:23 a.m. local time

[01:16] in Phoenix, Arizona, when she saw the

[01:18] number of her husband's longtime

[01:20] assistant, Michael McCoy, appear on her

[01:23] phone. In retrospect, she said she knew

[01:25] the words he'd been shot before Mr.

[01:28] McCann screamed them. And that is an

[01:30] excerpt from the New York Times. What

[01:33] did Erica describe when she spoke of

[01:35] kneeling over her husband and whispering

[01:38] in his ear? Not some wound that was out

[01:40] of place, but a single gray hair. If we

[01:44] use continuity as another perspective

[01:47] and we ask what happened after this, but

[01:50] to the person that was the closest to

[01:52] Charlie Kirk, the closest to the victim

[01:54] here, what was her experience? Well, Mr.

[01:57] Kirk's chartered plane traveled back to

[01:59] Scottdale to ferry his wife to Provo,

[02:02] but he was pronounced dead as she was

[02:04] airborne. I'm looking at the clouds in

[02:06] the mountains, Miss Kirk recalled, of

[02:08] those surreal hours. It was such a

[02:11] gorgeous day and I was thinking this is

[02:13] exactly what he saw. This is what Eric

[02:16] is thinking about. Not that there is

[02:18] some unsolved conspiracy with some other

[02:21] shooter still out on the loose. And if

[02:24] anyone should know that the media

[02:26] narrative doesn't line up with reality,

[02:28] it should be her because she saw her

[02:30] husband postmortem. Now, although no

[02:33] autopsy is out, we do actually already

[02:35] have a firsthand account of Charlie

[02:37] Kirk's injuries, as I say, from the

[02:40] person closest to him. What injuries

[02:42] does she describe? Does she describe any

[02:44] injury to his head? Let's put those

[02:47] words on screen. Does she describe any

[02:50] injury to his head? According to the

[02:52] article, the sheriff met her in the

[02:55] hospital. He offered her the option of

[02:57] seeing the body, but she said advised

[02:59] against it. The bullet, he explained,

[03:01] had ravaged Mr. Kirk's neck. Not his

[03:04] head, his neck. Now, it may seem as if

[03:06] this implies an exit wound, but it

[03:08] doesn't. And it doesn't because the

[03:10] assassin used what's known as a soft

[03:13] round. Must say, I've seen a few gun

[03:15] experts talking as if they've got

[03:18] expertise on this particular case, which

[03:20] I'm sure they do have, but they don't

[03:22] seem to have much expertise in terms of

[03:24] true crime and in terms of knowing the

[03:26] actual information. Soft rounds are

[03:28] associated with hunting and are intended

[03:30] to give the animal a quick and humane

[03:33] death. Soft rounds basically distribute

[03:36] energy the moment they impact their

[03:39] target. A soft point bullet expands upon

[03:42] impact with a soft target like animal

[03:43] flesh to create a larger wound channel

[03:46] and deliver more energy, promoting a

[03:48] faster and more humane kill. This

[03:50] expansion provides greater stopping

[03:52] power and is a common choice for

[03:54] hunting. So it's not like this is some

[03:56] sort of exotic very unusual kind of

[03:59] extreme thing. It is a very typical type

[04:02] of ammunition. Now if the round is more

[04:04] associated with hunting than those using

[04:07] assassinations or crimes like murder, I

[04:09] think a lot of these people from gun

[04:11] channels and and so on that want you to

[04:13] believe in a conspiracy want you to

[04:15] believe this is a professional

[04:16] assassination. Why would you use a round

[04:19] like that in a professional

[04:20] assassination? And why would you use a

[04:22] weapon like this in this kind of

[04:24] assassination? So, let's look at the

[04:26] firearm that fired this round. Well,

[04:28] sure enough, Robinson's weapon is a

[04:31] classic hunting rifle. That's probably

[04:33] why his grandfather gave it to him in

[04:34] the first place, for hunting, not for

[04:37] assassinations. According to NBC News,

[04:39] for decades, these type of firearms have

[04:42] been favored by hunters who prize them

[04:44] for their durability, reliability, and

[04:47] accuracy. And with 30-06

[04:51] rounds, they are ideal weapons to take

[04:53] down medium to large game like deer,

[04:56] elk, and even bear. Now, in order to

[04:58] understand the injury in this case, I

[04:59] think it's more the type of round than

[05:02] the type of rifle that addresses it. But

[05:05] an obvious insight into this is that

[05:06] hunters typically don't want to destroy

[05:09] the heads or bodies of the animals they

[05:11] are shooting because they need them for

[05:13] trophies and sometimes to eat the meat.

[05:15] Also this idea of trying to hunt in a

[05:18] humane way does make sense. But the

[05:20] bottom line here is that the type of

[05:22] ammunition also matters in the Oscar

[05:24] Ptorius case and I wrote a couple of

[05:26] books about that also attended his

[05:28] trial. That was also where I had a lot

[05:30] of experience dealing with this whole

[05:32] idea of trajectories and so he used

[05:34] black talon ammunition in that

[05:36] particular case which splinters and

[05:38] fragments on contact with moisture

[05:41] including human tissue. In that case,

[05:43] you are also not going to find a simple

[05:46] in-n-out wound, and you didn't. Now, the

[05:49] opportunistic creators out there know

[05:52] there's a whole sea of ambivalence to

[05:54] work with, and they can work with this

[05:56] until the autopsy report comes out,

[05:59] which means they can spin that statement

[06:01] to mean terms of the ravaged area um

[06:03] that she's referring to. That's the exit

[06:06] wound. And I'm not going to show it. I'm

[06:07] sure you've all seen it on the shock

[06:09] jocks channel trying to trying desperate

[06:11] to to monetize this and milk it for all

[06:14] they are worth. But uh I think you

[06:16] probably have seen it. And what it is,

[06:17] it's a tiny little dot on his neck. Now,

[06:20] no one would refer to that dot as

[06:22] ravaged. Instead, they want you to

[06:24] believe that the entry wound is in an

[06:26] area you can't see, of course, and that

[06:29] there is an exit wound just with no

[06:31] blood and no damage. and which if that

[06:35] was the case, it would be the first in

[06:36] the history of assassinations. The

[06:39] ravage side of Kirk's neck is the

[06:42] backside. And you can get a sense of

[06:44] that from this particular image where

[06:46] you see his shirt sort of balloon

[06:48] outwards and ravaged I don't think means

[06:51] there is an exit wound, just that that

[06:53] rear area is damaged, basically swollen.

[06:56] Kirk's wife also described the

[06:58] expression on his face that he seemed to

[07:00] have a slight smile. None of this would

[07:02] be the case if you had this kind of head

[07:05] injury. It certainly wouldn't look like

[07:07] that. I've seen the autopsy photos of

[07:09] Rever and it certainly isn't going to

[07:11] make you think pleasant thoughts the way

[07:13] that she she has in terms of seeing um

[07:16] her husband's face postmortem. And then

[07:18] we hear that she leaned over and kissed

[07:20] him goodbye. She kind of seems to have a

[07:23] um although it's obviously a very

[07:24] traumatic event that took place, but

[07:26] she's kind of made peace with what has

[07:28] happened and forgiven the person. Now,

[07:30] why on earth would she say that if there

[07:33] was some kind of other narrative, other

[07:35] injuries, and some kind of shooter

[07:37] that's still out there? Now, you might

[07:39] think that your theory based on very

[07:41] little um actual evidence. You might

[07:43] think, "No, this is actually evidence."

[07:44] It's actually based on very little

[07:46] direct actual evidence makes sense. But

[07:49] you actually got to weigh that against,

[07:51] well, who's the person closest to him?

[07:53] And what does she believe? And wouldn't

[07:55] she know better than what a lot of these

[07:57] people, these opportunists are pedalling

[08:00] online and making a fortune out of your

[08:04] uh gullibility in many of your cases.

[08:07] Those who are not being gullible, high

[08:09] five. You are the true rocket scientist

[08:12] in like a valley of I think just blind

[08:14] people. Blind people who just follow the

[08:17] oneeyed man. the oneeyed man who is

[08:20] talking about certain things but just

[08:21] with absolutely no knowledge, no

[08:23] education on the facts of this case and

[08:26] facts matter. I would like to say, you

[08:28] know, at the end of the day, um the

[08:30] truth will out and we'll see what is

[08:32] going to happen. But unfortunately, in

[08:34] this landscape, they are going to be

[08:36] peddling lots of different mischievous

[08:38] little theories and they are going to

[08:40] get a massive amount of traction and by

[08:42] the time the truth comes out, you know

[08:44] what? No one is actually going to care.

[08:46] They will have made their money, banked

[08:48] it, and they'll be sitting pretty all at

[08:51] your expense. The expense of your your

[08:54] not all of you, but certainly many of

[08:55] you not terribly good uh ability to use

[08:59] logic, reason, uh reading up about the

[09:02] case, curiosity, and basically common

[09:05] sense as well. Anyway, let me know if

[09:07] you're starting to change your mind,

[09:09] even if you're having a couple of

[09:10] doubts. But, uh I'm not going to take it

[09:12] further than that. Thank you for

[09:13] listening and I'll see you guys next

[09:15] time.

[09:19] [Music]

[09:35] Heat. Heat.

[09:36] [Music]

[09:57] Heat up

[10:03] [Music]

[10:16] [Music]

[10:22] here.