Let's get into it. Coach Colin here. What's going on, guys? Sorry I wasn't able to be with you guys on Saturday. I apologize for that. Had so many things pop up. Halloween chores, unpacking, in-laws, all sorts of stuff was going on. So, couldn't do that for you. Saturdays, I like to do one video per day. day. Rest of the week, I like to do two videos per day because I'm now trying to find time to work on Patreon content because I want to make that content actually good and I want to actually make content for the Patreon. Uh, I might have to end up taking one day off, maybe even two depending on, you know, how much content I put on there. I I'm I'm trying to go big. I I want you guys to actually have something good for, you know, paying for it, right? I mean, uh, so we'll see. We'll see. And I'm going to break all that down for the Patreon folks that already signed up before I even put a video there. I love you. Straight up. Straight up. I have a real problem asking for things from anybody. My mom taught me not to complain about anything and just get to work, and that's what I do. So for people to do that, just thank you so much. You have no idea. But let's get into the video, guys. And Patreon folks, I'm going to make a video explaining that very, very soon. Let's get to the video. Erica Kirk is calling out the defense of Tyler Robinson. She wants there to be a camera presence. And I know what you're thinking. You're thinking gag order, Cash Patel blocking foreign probe to foreign intel possibly being involved. All these wild things happening. And on top of that, they did not want they are trying to make it so no camera presence is involved. We're going to break it all down. It's wild. It's really wild that they're trying to do this. But Erica surprisingly voicing her opinion on this whole thing. And I have to be honest, I like that she did this. I like that she's making her opinion known on this whole thing. Let's play it right now and then we're going to break down how they've come to this conclusion, what their reasoning is in regards to this and if it's actually going to happen and also put on your tinfoil speedos because I have a theory of what they're trying to do. Okay? And that's going to come near the end. But let's play this. >> The defense wants to ban cameras in the courtroom. How do you feel about that? >> There were cameras all over my husband when he was murdered. There have been cameras all over my friends and family mourning. There have been cameras all over me, analyzing my every move, analyzing my every smile, my every tear. We deserve to have cameras in there. Why not be transparent? There's nothing to hide. I know there's not because I've seen what the case is built on. Let everyone see what true evil is. This is something that could impact a generation and generations to come. The defense >> Very true. Very true. And I agree. Why not be transparent? Let's see. You know, uh for her, she's saying she's seen the case. She understands, you know, what they're building the case on. the foundation evidence, everything like that. I wonder what's there to hide on either side. I mean, I I got to say, you know, not to go at her, but it seems like on one side, they are blocking a lot from the public. And then on the defense side, they're blocking things as well. the defense. You kind of expect this from not so much from the what do we call the plaintiff, the victims, the other side, I'll call it. So, it's very interesting. Let me play this Fox clip. They talk about this a little bit, too. We're going to dissect exactly what they're saying here about this subject. Then, we're going to get into the real nitty-gritty, and I'm going to show you the actual part of where they started requesting no cameras. And actually, they snuck it in just when nobody was looking, basically. But we we'll get to that in a second. Let's play this first. Guys, listen. The glasses just broke. Listen. Subscribe. Hit the subscribe button. Hit the like button. Turn on your notifications. Please. That is all I ask of you guys. There's so many of you that are not subscribed. Please subscribe. Especially cuz, you know, eventually they're going to catch on to this Philadelphia stuff. They're going to catch on eventually. They're going to figure out what I'm actually saying. Need your help before that happens. Okay. All right. Subscribe. I'm out of here. >> Todd Judge overseeing the case against Charlie Kirk's accused killer holding a closed door hearing today. It's expected to deal with a request from the defense to allow the suspect Tyler Robinson to wear street clothes and be unshackled in court. Now, the motion requesting the court allows Robinson to quote appear at all proceedings in civilian attire and to be without physical restraints during in all in-person hearings. Now, the motion points to the University of Idaho murders case where then defendant Brian Coberger was allowed to wear street clothes in court. Robinson's defense team also hopes to keep the media at a distance, saying in a filing this, Mr. Robinson agrees with the sheriff that the court should limit media coverage or video and photographic coverage at the least. So defendants physical appearance is no longer the subject of interest. >> See that's weird. The sheriff I wish it would stay. I didn't get this off YouTube. I had to go to their website. But the sheriff Robinson agrees with the sheriff. Now if you remember just recently I did a video about how easy it was to get on the roof. Uh there was a gentleman named Brian uh Enon who did a uh he did a whole breakdown, but he actually sat down with the sheriff and it's in it's just interesting that the sheriff and Robinson are agreeing on something. And here's the thing, the sheriff is on what I was calling the other side, the plaintiff, you know, the the the truth seekers, the the people who want, you know, uh justice. Even he's saying that he doesn't want cameras. I find that so odd. So odd. And then you got to look at it again because I just said it seems like both sides, let's be I'm not going to mince my words. Seems like both sides are hiding something, right? I think we can agree on that. The only person who's saying, "Yeah, yeah, go ahead. Put cameras everywhere." is Erica. Very weird. Very weird. And and I get it from Erica's point of view. She's like, "Why wouldn't there be like why do I have to go?" She hugs JD Vance. People are like, "Done deal. They're married." She cries. They're like, "Not enough tears." So, she's going through it. Like, whether you believe those examples I just brought up or not, she's going through it. So, she's like, "Everybody go through it. Why am I the only one that has to go through it? My husband's gone. I'm going through it. I'm getting analyzed. Let this guy get analyzed. What's the big deal?" And I agree honestly if she's going to get thrown accusations like she's been thrown accusations and you know some of them I might have to talk about on Patreon but there are some things uh why not have Robinson go through the same thing. You're up for murder. Like I get it and maybe no shackles. Maybe no shackles but other than that I don't know man. I think I think you're up for murder. You should just kind of have to get walked out there. And again, I know all this evidence is pointing to him not doing this alone. And sometimes, I mean, straight up, Candace, she's like, he wasn't even there. We'll see, but it just seems odd that this is even a conversation. Very weird. Again, there's no shortage of weirdness when it comes to this case. Let's just keep going here for a minute. >> And he has some chance of securing a fair and impartial jury. Kaylee, I'm curious your thoughts as an attorney and also a master of communications given that obviously criminal defendants appear in court every day all day and we've seen both occur. We see as well um the Manion case here where that defense team was accused of of taking it um to advantage taking advantage of the court's leniency with letting the defendant wear a suit. And sort of the concept goes, well, if it's so impartial, if it's so prejuditial here, then it would be for the millions of other defendants that don't get the luxury of a suit being handed to them by their defense team. >> Yeah, you're exactly right. And and we know with Manion, uh, there was some criticism there that he got some preferential treatment. So, why does Mr. Robinson want this? And and where does he get off suggesting that he deserves this or is owed this? You know, I just refreshed my constitutional law background here. Fifth amendment, you get the protection against self-inccrimination, double jeopardy. You get your due process rights from the Sixth Amendment. You get the speedy and public trial, impartial jury right to counsel, uh, and then the right to compel witnesses. Nowhere in here, Mr. Robinson, is there a right to wear street clothes? Yeah, you can request that. You certainly don't have a right to that. What I >> find it so funny that she's like, "M, where does Robinson get off?" Robinson doesn't know anything that's going on right now. You think he's like involved like uh let me just break this down for you defense team. I just think that I should have no shackles on street clothes like as if he knows like like he's the guy really calling the shots here. Obviously his lawyer has to be calling the shots. I just find it funny. She's like talking directly like Mr. Robinson. Let me tell you a thing or two. It's just so funny. Mainstream on either side just is so weird sometimes. Let me play this clip quickly. This is the the real one I wanted to play. >> The Mr. Robinson's case, you know, it has to do with his connection with Fox News. He was beloved here. He was part of the fabric of Fox News. And I think, you know, they know that Fox News is very popular out there and they want to control that, too. >> That's very interesting. She's talking about Charlie Kirk there. Charlie Kirk was actually shunned by Fox because of his relationship with Tucker until he there was a certain time where they would not have Charlie on. Because if you think about it, Charlie should have been on every other day considering who Charlie was and what Fox is all about. Should have been on all the time, but he actually wasn't on all that much. You'd be surprised. Like go and try and find there should be a hundred clips of Charlie Kirk on Fox. There's not. There's not that many. So, uh, that's not true. But let's keep going. too. >> And that's something that I wanted to to bring up with you, Cheryl, is that interestingly, so with the judge committed to transparency, the reality is there's been a lot of security threats and therefore some even of the filings, for example, the prosecutor's reply to this motion has been withheld for security consideration. So the reality is that the public's not even getting the full record, although many of Americans saw the horrific record of the assassination on social media. And to Kayle's point, there's so much evidence in this case that is going to come to light if indeed there is a trial. But if there is a trial, it seems that these new attorneys who obviously are volunteering their time. They came in from, if I'm not wrong, California, I believe, Emily. These these two attorneys, uh, they're looking for their moment to cash in on fame and fortune by representing this defendant. They know it's going to be a high profile case if it goes to court. as I've said before on the couch really hope it doesn't because of the pain that it's going to cause the family and people having to relive what happened to Charlie at the same >> man that was pretty much the part that I wanted the well I mean you know all of that was important just a little breakdown we're going to move on to the next clip but it was just so funny that she was like I hope it doesn't go to trial because of all the pain it's going to cause you know I was really shooken up if you if you're a longtime watcher of the channel uh I was very shooken up I could not hide my emotions on camera. I shot one video, I was crying way too much. I shot another one, still couldn't hold it back. I shot another one, still couldn't hold it back. I was like, "Okay, like this is just how it's going to be until, you know, until time goes by, right?" Uh, but you really do have to watch how people try to play on your emotions. They really try to like grab your emotions, like all the pain it's going to cause. But then again, that's why I played Erica at the beginning. Erica is good, you know? I'm sure she goes home and breaks down, but on camera she's like, "Bring it. Let's see everything. Let's see the whole trial. Let everybody see. Let's go. I would love to see it." And you know what? Again, I told you put on your tin foil speedo. I think there's part there's part of me that believes she wants to see justice and she's forgiven Tyler, right? She's forgiven Tyler. There's that aspect, but there's also the aspect of I I feel like part of her is like, well, let's see if Tyler's guilty. And if he's not, I guess we have to go another route. And then all of a sudden, you have to start looking at everything Candace has been saying recently, calling out turn certain people at Turning Point, calling out Tyler, calling out uh Rob McCoy, Frank Turk, military backgrounds, the plane. Then all of a sudden all that comes into play because okay if it wasn't him then where are we going with this part of me thinks that's what I don't think that's her primary thought process but I do think it's part of it where it's like let me see if this guy's the guy. Let's bring all their evidence and if he's not well then I want to go deeper and figure out who it was. I that's just me. That's just me when I see her. uh cuz she's really ready for everything to just be out on front street like I don't know. But here uh here's a little breakdown of how they came to this reply. Okay, this reply was withheld like that woman said on Fox, it was withheld. This is why and how. Check this out. >> Friday, I see there is a post uh that's linked to a Fox News article and Fox News is reporting that uh they're requesting to remove the cameras from the courtroom. And I thought, huh, that's kind of crazy because I certainly didn't see a motion to that effect. And so it turns out the reason why uh hadn't seen it uh is because it's buried in the reply because apparently uh the sheriff has requested it, but we didn't get to see that because that's part of the state's response. Uh and so nobody found out, I certainly didn't find out uh until that this is actually on the table uh until the defense files the reply two days before today's hearing. Today's hearing was announced by the court uh to rule give a ruling on on the motion after they had a closed hearing on Friday. So that's kind of our our background. We expected, you know, today was going to just be a kind of boring old ruling on uh whether Tyler Robinson is going to be able to wear civilian clothing or not. Uh maybe get an answer about that weird order to transport that got filed. There was order to transport that named this guy Jackson Fox and it was just very unclear they bringing this guy over to be some kind of a witness in the case which if they were is a little bit alarming uh just given his uh personal posture given the charges that he is facing and the potential incentives he would have to say essentially anything the prosecution wanted uh to make that go away. So, you know, hoping maybe we'd get some clarity on on what exactly happened in that closed hearing to the extent you can tell us. But uh as it turns out, we are going to get uh some kind of ruling on this uh this request to take the cameras out. So, let's go ahead and start by turning to the uh the reply that the defense filed so that we can see what this is about, where it came from, and uh kind of what the deal is. Nothing nothing in this would scream red alert, hey, we're suddenly uh suddenly talking about cameras in the courtroom. Uh, but as you'll see, it turns out that we are because you get to uh what they're gonna say here. Mr. Robinson agrees with the sheriff that this court should limit video and photographic coverage of court proceedings so that his physical appearance is no longer the subject of interest and his right to a fair trial by an impartial jury is fully protected. It's buried in the reply. not just buried in the reply, but buried in like the last section on the last pages of the reply. This is a little bit alarming to be uh to be burying a request like this. So, let's let's walk through this reply a little bit. >> Okay, so she's going to walk through that reply, but hold on. The sheriff requested it. That doesn't that makes that Hold on. It's not even the angle that this video was at. I was just Hold on. The sheriff requested it. He's saying I don't understand. Wait, who side is the sheriff on? I I automatically just think that the sheriff is on the side of the prosecutor. That was the word I was looking for. Thank you, Andrea. Thank you so much for that. The pro I thought he was just on their side, but he's saying something for the defense side. Who is this sheriff? I got I I just have to look at this really quick before she goes on to that reply. You know what? I'll play I'll play her going through the reply and I'll research this at the same time. Okay, does that sound fair? Let's go. This is also like the only information that we have about what the sheriff's position actually is because we didn't get to see that filing and so um all we know is to the extent they're responding to us and they're telling us what it is that they're responding to. So, this reply addresses four of the legal arguments in the sheriff's response. One, Mr. Robinson's right to be free from restraints applies only at a jury trial. Two, the law prohibiting court appearances in jail clothing also applies only in front of the jury. Three, all non-critical, non-evidentiary hearings should be held remotely. And four, the law supports the sheriff's office position that Mr. uh Robinson's hypothesized concerns that prospective jurors might see Mr. Robinson in jail clothing and shackles and could then perceive that he is guilty should be adequately addressed by a repairing appearing remotely and b limiting media coverage or video and photographic coverage at the least so that defend defendants physical appearance is no longer the subject of interest. So with the uh while each of these arguments is addressed in turn, Mr. Robinson begins by addressing the sheriff's factual assertion that Mr. Robinson's concerns about prejuditial pre-trial publicity are merely hypothesized. So they're taking issue with the uh idea that well this is the harm is just hypothetical. So Mr. Robinson's concern about the effect of prejuditial pre-trial publicity in this extraordinary case is not merely hypothesized. Quote the problem is an ancient one. Mr. Justice Holmes stated no more than a commonplace win two generations ago he noted that any judge who is set with juries knows that in spite of forms they are extremely likely to be impregnated by the environing atmosphere. So, nowhere is the statement more true than where television cameras have been allowed into the courtroom at the pre-trial stages of a criminal case or where television news crews are turned loose on those eager to obtain fame or fortune concerning a pending criminal case. Guys, here we go. Here we go with the laundry list of the ways that the cameras are bad. The the grifter the grifter argument from the moment the trial judges announce trial judge announces that a case will be televised it becomes a cause celeb. The whole community including prospective jurors becomes interested in all the morbid details surrounding it. The the the morbid the gratuitous interest. That's how they cast it. That's how they cast it when they don't want you looking. See, remember it was just over a month ago when they wanted everybody to be paying attention because they wanted tips. They're like, "Hey, public, spread these pictures far and wide so that you can help us identify the perpetrator." They really, really want the public interest to help them solve the case. And then as soon as it lands up in court, you're going to turn around and shame the public for taking the interest that you cultivated. The approaching trial immediately assumes an important status in the public press and the accused is highly publicized along with the offense with which he is charged. Every juror carries with him into the jury box these solemn facts and thus increases the chance of prejudice that is present in every criminal case. And we must remember that it that realistically it is only the notorious trial which will be broadcast. The conscious or unconscious effect that this may have on the juror's judgment cannot be evaluated. But experience indicates that it is not only possible but highly probable that it will this is so weird. This is so weird that Okay, let me just pull up who this guy is. I I want to look deeper into him. Anybody out there, you know, if you know who this guy is, please let me know if you've heard about him. Uh, if you've heard about him, if you any anything that you can tell me about this guy, please let me know. Nate, current Washington has been elected special 2021. He's shown. Okay, so here, uh, Tyler Robinson. Going to pull up a couple videos. This guy's basically just the sheriff so far. Key role. Okay. So, he played a key role in facilitating the peaceful surrender of Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the shooting of conservative Charlie Kirk. Um, during a press conference held on September 17th, he classified that the suspect, Tyler Robinson, turned himself in after a 33 degree manhunt, arriving at Washington, it's 33 hours, but it's 33 degrees when you see the number. You know what I mean? Arriving at Washington County Sheriff's Office with his parents around 900 PM on the 11th, he emphasized that the surrender was negotiated to be as peaceful and non-confrontational as possible due the Robinson's fear of a SWAT raid on his parents' home or being shot by law enforcement, etc., etc. Okay, so he was just the guy that took him. Is this the guy? That's the guy. Okay, so that's Nate. All right, I have a couple videos. I just want to see who Nate is. I I you know what I really want to do is go deeper into who Nate is. You know what? Let me just do Let me just do that. Let me just do that in front of you guys. Let's let's let's honor Candace here. Uh military service. Let's see. Go to images. Is there any military service with with my boy here? Let's see. Huh? Okay. There's no information about military service. All right. Well, that X's that out. I wonder what Oh, there. Let's do this one. Uh, sheriff uh LDS church. See if he is connected to that church. Rumors linking the LDS church to surround. Um, the suspect in the shooting. Wow. I really have to take this down. So, there is a connection to the church. That makes sense. It's either they're going to be connected to intel or they're going to be connected to that church. That's what I'm noticing about this case. Uh let me just >> Nate Brooksby said that >> if this uh video shows anything >> about the events leading up to Charlie Kirk's accused assassin's surrender. >> Liv Keller Harris joining us from the Washington County Sheriff's Office where Tyler Robinson volunteered voluntarily surrendered. and live, walk us through that evening. What has the sheriff said about the sequence of events leading up to this? >> Well, Jamie, we know that Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby received a call at 802 on Thursday evening from a friend who's also a retired detective from the Washington County Sheriff's Office. That retired detective said he knew who the suspect was in the shooting of Charlie Kirk. He said that um he's in Washington County and that they were working with him to voluntarily surrender. That's when negotiations began after they uh decided on some terms for that surrender. He was then driven to the sheriff's office by that retired detective. Him and his parents came together. He was held here for two and a half hours before he was brought to Utah County around 2 a.m. >> Lib, you mentioned that Robinson and his parents were together that night. What were the conditions of Robinson's surrender? >> Well, the sheriff said that Robinson was afraid of being shot by police or of a SWAT situation at his parents' home in Washington City. The sheriff said sheriff said that he basically asked for a peaceful, gentle, comfortable transition in order for him to peacefully surrender. When he arrived here at the sheriff's office, he was met by officers in plain clothes. He was not handcuffed. He was placed into a questioning room with his parents where he was given water, a couch to sit on, and basically just some time to wait until the lead investigators arrived. And with >> Oh man. Okay, this is this is going to be one of those thing that's on Patreon cuz the first video I'm making is what I really think about this whole uh this whole case, you know, and it's not that I don't say what I'm thinking here, but I'm trying to I'm trying to disseminate information for you. So, I'm trying to come at it from a certain standpoint of the information that we have. But if you just come [laughter] to my mind, my my brain where my brain just goes naturally. Oh, you're not allowed to talk about that on here. I don't know why, but you're just not. You're just not. But I'm I'm going to remember this video. I'm going to remember this video. I'm actually going to pull this video aside. But aside from there, there is a tinfoil speedo theory that I kind of have here. Now, uh, when it comes to Tyler not being here, let me just see if I can find the exact wording. Fair trial jail previously had come. However, yes, there it is. Has not. Now, let me make sure you guys can see this. Now, this is about talking about the judge, Tony Graph, has not banned cameras entirely. October 27th, this is the trial that they're all talking about, the the the closed hearing that they all talk about. He ruled that while news outlets cannot show Robinson in shackles, or film him entering, standing, or leaving the courtroom. Broader restrictions on media coverage were not immediately imposed. The judge described the media attention as extraordinary and stated that his current restrictions aimed to balance a fair trial for Robinson. Okay, so there is a theory here when it comes to let me just highlight this when it comes to him entering, standing or leaving. Now, I'm not going to be able to find the video, but you know, actually, you know what? I have to find some videos. Let Let's do this. Let's go. Let's go deep. We all listen. We all came here with no pants on, just tinfoil speedos. So, why don't we just do a little bit of digging? Um, really quick, I'll jump on X. That video of Tyler walking. I just need that video. Tyler Robinson walking. Hopefully, it finds it. Let's find the video of him walking. Where? Oh, they got some AI videos going on here. Where is the video of him walking down the street? Is this it? Oh, come on. Nope. It's just him standing there. Let me find another one. There is a video. Is this it? This is another video of someone who they think is Tyler Robinson, which is very interesting. You know what? Let me pull that one up as well, because in that one he's not walking weird. I'm trying to find the video of where he's walking with a severe limp and they connect that to him having a firearm down his pants. Wow. I'm so glad I'm not showing you guys my screen. I put in Tyler Robinson walking and you wouldn't I can't even describe the things that are popping up. I'm asking for a video of a guy walking down the street and I just saw some lady's hoo-ha. Why? How? How? How does that work? X is gross sometimes. You know what I mean? Let's see. This is the video. Beautiful. I found it. Okay. How does that happen? I see some ladies. You know what? Anyway, let me play this video for you guys. So he's limping here, right? So there is a theory and now I'm kind of I'm thinking I'm I'm doubly thinking about this theory because people actually say there's been there's been a theory right amongst us who crinkle with the foil. There's been a theory that the reason that he's walking like that is not because there's a firearm, but it's because he has a partially because he has a partially paralyzed leg. And when I first heard this theory, it was uh just some guy on TikTok. I think his name is Media Autopsy or something like that, I think. and he was just like, you know, he's like he's his legs partially paralyzed and that's why that's why they don't show you the video when he's walking up the stairs and there's no perp walk and you don't really see him moving around or anything because they don't want you to connect the two that the fact that they're saying this is him walking with a firearm, all of a sudden you'll see him with no firearm and he'll be walking the same way. That's the theory. But now when I see that the judge is actually saying, "Hey, these are the things I don't want people to see. I don't want them to see him walking. I don't want him to that people to see him standing, which odd because I guess that would lead to steps and they don't want anybody to see him leaving the courtroom." Very, very interesting. Now again, I don't know if that theory is correct. And when I first heard the theory, I didn't even give it enough attention to make a video about it. Honestly, I was going to, but I was like, I don't know. I haven't heard anything to like reinforce that. I like to make connections. So, I'll hear something. I'll wait for a while, and if I start seeing little blips about the same thing that make it all connect, then I'm like, "Okay, let me cover this." But nothing came up with that until now. When I see that, I'm like, "Oh, they don't want they don't want you to see him walking. That's weird. That's very, very weird. On top of that, it's not the defense that doesn't want the defense would want you to see him walking. They'd be like, "Hey, check it out. Check out this guy. He limps. Look at him. Take a take Tyler. Take a circle around. Look at him limping." That's what they would do. That's if I was a lawyer, that's what I would do. Your honor, allow me to have Tyler stand up and limp around this courtroom. Colin, this is out of order. No, it's not out of order. Let me finish. Let me finish. He has a bum leg. Let me let me show him your bum leg. Get up. Get up. Stand up. That would be me. I'd win every case. Um, [laughter] but the sheriff is the one who is suggesting that the cameras not be in there. There is something going on with this case. And I don't know if it's the Egyptian planes. I don't know if it's the people around Charlie. I don't know. But there is something very odd. Even the reason I saved this video, this video here, and I'm going to show it to the Patreon art uh audience, is because it's very odd that they they to there's a connection to that church, right? Not to speak down about that church, but that church is where they go to recruit. It's a known thing, right? Utah in general, it seems. But the fact that they had him, they're trying to convince him and they kept him for two to three hours of trying to convince him. Well, there's something else that they could be doing within that time. And it's nothing weird or nothing nothing diddy like none of that stuff. No, no, no. Not talking about that. But there's something that they could be doing for two hours and then this guy walks out of the room thinking I have to turn myself in for what I've done. Again, not saying Tyler's an angel. It's not what I'm referring to at all. It's just very odd. But at the end of the day, when it comes to the cameras being involved, Erica is all for it. So that Fox woman saying, "Oh, what it's going to do to the family. They're going to have to relive this." Eric, Erica is the top of that. The children aren't. The children are going through it in a different way. She's the one going through it. His parents are going through it. Yes, of course. But there's not a day that they don't relive that in their minds, in their hearts. Charlie had a sister as well. You know, they're all going through that. So, I I honestly don't think that they're going to mind having cameras there because the cameras are going to be super focused on Erica and they're going to be super focused on Tyler. That's what's going to happen obviously. And Erica's she's down. She's like, let's go. Camera up. She's like, I've had cameras in my face every single day. I got Mikey McCoy following me around you. It's a bad It's a dark joke. I'm still gonna make it. Erica is sitting there like, I've had Mikey McCoy following me around with a camera just like he did my husband. You know how scary that is? Something's going to happen to me and he's going to walk away. I had to make the joke. When the jokes come to me, I have to make them. Okay, it's a thing. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. And she is probably thinking that she has the same security Charlie did. I'd be terrified. Uh, do you guys We're going out there. Are you guys Are you guys ready? They're like, "Oh, yeah. No problem." No. Yeah, of course. There's a roof over there. Do you have a Do you have a Did you check it? Did you check it? Um Oh my god. Are you guys serious? Are you guys serious? We just We didn't think about You're right. There is a roof over there. We just didn't think about check. Did you check it? None of us checked. Get new security. She's friends with JD Vance and Trump. Get Secret Service. Not the same Secret Service that was with Trump that day. Don't get those guys. Get the big guys. Get the 6 foot four. Those big dudes. Get those dudes. Anyways, guys. [laughter] Anyways, I just wanted to bring that to you. I'm going to end it. We We ran this episode a little long. I just wanted to bring that to you. I'm out of here.
