Up Next
Cameron Vance Was at the Event and Explains Why So Few Videos of Kirk's Shooting Are Online
8:06
Ben Shapiro Honors Charlie Kirk While Condemning Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson for Spreading Conspiracy Theories
31:03
Understanding the Charlie Kirk Autopsy: Lauren the Mortician Explains the Medical Examiner Report and Forensic Process
31:31
Exclusive Details on Charlie Kirk's Death: Spinal Injury, Autopsy Findings, and FBI Investigation Revealed
New information emerges about the death of Charlie Kirk that has not been widely reported. Through conversations with witnesses, law enforcement contacts, and people close to Turning Point USA, exclusive details have surfaced about the nature of Kirk's injuries, the bullet trajectory, 4K footage in FBI possession, and the mandatory autopsy performed under Utah homicide protocol. The bullet crashed through cervical vertebrae C2 through C6, completely destroying Kirk's spinal cord and causing his heart to stop. Meanwhile, questions remain about whether the investigation is being properly handled or potentially sabotaged from within federal agencies, even as the trial against Tyler Robinson approaches.
The Injury Details No One Else Has Reported
Exclusive information has emerged regarding the death of Charlie Kirk. Through direct conversations with people connected to law enforcement, the state of Utah, and Turning Point USA, critical details about Kirk's injuries have come to light that answer questions many analysts have been asking.
The injury to Kirk's neck begins at the C2 cervical vertebrae. The bullet crashed through C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6, completely destroying Kirk's spinal cord. This catastrophic spinal damage is what caused him to tense up and what made his heart stop beating. It also explains why gushes of blood rather than squirts of blood were coming from him.
The doctor found the main portion of the bullet near Kirk's T1 thoracic vertebrae, near the spine where the neck vertebrae connect to the upper back vertebrae. The source did not confirm whether the bullet was a .30-06 round. They simply referenced it as "a bullet." Also near T1, but not next to the bullet itself, were multiple fragments of the bullet.
Questions About Bullet Type and Trajectory
A full metal jacket .30-06 round would have gone right through Kirk and right through bone. A soft point .30-06 would likely have mushroomed but caused massive amounts of damage, which was not observed. No bullet exited his body. There was no blood spray, no blood spatter, and no hole in the banner behind him.
The assumption that it was a .30-06 comes from the gun found in the backwoods near someone's chicken coop. That gun had a spent casing of a .30-06, but there is no 100% certainty that the bullet in that casing is the bullet found in Kirk's neck. The casing was not ejected. If this was some kind of setup, that bullet could have been fired elsewhere, and all that is known for certain is that there is a casing inside that gun.
Reports are emerging that it may not be a .30-06 bullet that was found in his body. The likelihood that a .30-06, even after smashing through his neck, didn't come out the back end is very unlikely. Some are questioning whether it could have been a simpler rifle, a less powerful one like a .223, which definitely could have crashed into multiple vertebrae, shattered, and still been lethal.
The 4K Footage Turned Over to the FBI
From past Turning Point events, typically five 4K HD cameras are part of the setup when they go live. On this particular day, they did not go live on their YouTube channel, though this was simply a business decision and should not raise suspicion.
What is known is that there were at least three Turning Point cameras pointed right at Kirk's body: one from behind, one from behind to the side, and one in the front to his side. All of that footage has been turned over from Turning Point to the FBI. They no longer have that footage. They are not sharing it with anyone. They did not make copies, and they did not allow access to view the footage.
The cameras were all filming in 4K. This means that everything the public has seen on blurry videos, grainy videos, zoomed-in videos, videos that lost their quality, or screen shares of screen shares is not what the FBI is looking at. They have 4K footage of the situation.
This footage will be used because of the high quality 4K in the upcoming trial against Tyler Robinson. It shows the murder, death, and bodily damage. That footage is not likely ever going to be shown to the public. Even if it is shown in court, where it appears there will be a public open trial, it likely will not be shown on national television because of the extreme amount of blood, gore, and how gruesome it is.
Turning Point Employee Receives Death Threats
A Turning Point USA employee showed Candace Owens some footage. That footage may or may not be allowed in the court case. However, there were two others that were not shown that are believed will be part of the court case.
This particular Turning Point USA employee is extremely loyal to Kirk, a friend who has worked for Turning Point for many years. Candace Owens brought up his name, which led many people to have suspicious, malicious feelings toward him. She was not the only one, but Candace needs to be very careful because this person, whom she called a friend and past acquaintance repeatedly, is now receiving death threats and is afraid for his life and his family. The FBI has cleared him, and the footage he grabbed was turned over to the FBI.
Many people are putting out videos directly accusing people of being guilty, and now when they are found to not be guilty, it is putting their lives in danger.
FBI Communication and Investigation Concerns
The FBI is in regular communication with Erika Kirk, but not necessarily always in communication with Turning Point, since no one at Turning Point is familiarly related to Kirk. Whenever there is a question or doubt or a point that needs clarification, the FBI will reach out to Turning Point and get the answer from whoever they believe has the best answer.
The FBI is supposedly doing their best, and the public is being impatient, demanding that they release footage showing the shot, footage showing Tyler Robinson or whoever jumping up and running across the roof. Questions remain about why blurry photos of somebody entering the tunnel were released when those are new cameras that should be HD quality. Perhaps the FBI was nervous about putting somebody's face out there and having what has now happened to the Turning Point USA employee happen to others. But there is also the question: Is Kash Patel bungling this on purpose, or is somebody trying to set him up?
Deep State Sabotage or Legitimate Investigation?
Attorney Ivan Raiklin, a former Green Beret, joined Alex Jones to discuss what he believes is happening. Raiklin pointed out that the same individuals who were in place at the DOJ and FBI during the Russia collusion investigation, the 2020 election, and the attempted assassinations of President Trump are still in place. Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and Pam Bondi have not removed most of them. These individuals could potentially be muddying the investigation to make Patel look like a complete buffoon, or they could be part of an operation to ensure the investigation looks legitimate while concealing the truth.
Raiklin advised against putting the cart before the horse by trying to go after motive. There are many people with a motive to potentially harm Kirk, but there are too many hypotheses when it comes to motive. The focus should be on finding out who actually pulled the trigger beyond a reasonable doubt, then working the motive component and laying blame if it was a broader operation.
He noted that Candace Owens, if operating in good faith, has the most connections within the Kirk ecosystem, the biggest platform, and the biggest trust level within those spheres. Whistleblowers and insiders will likely be comfortable providing information to her. She will likely be the repository of all data points, videos, evidence, and insider information from people she has known over the years. However, there is concern that she may sometimes look for somebody and then try to build the story, versus just looking at the story and seeing who it points to.
The Autopsy Did Happen
Many people are questioning whether there was an autopsy or coroner's report. Someone put out a dispatch saying there was no autopsy. That is now being questioned as to whether it was earlier in the day or AI-generated.
There is a 100% chance that there was an autopsy or coroner's report and lots of photos of Kirk's body taken. It is Utah law that an autopsy must be performed in the event of a homicide. It does not matter whether Erika Kirk wanted one or Kirk's parents did not want one. It does not matter because now it is the state of Utah versus Tyler Robinson. Based on the law and protocol for homicide in Utah, there is a 100% chance that there was an autopsy.
The autopsy could have been done after any particular audio clip circulating online. It could have been done that night, in the morning before JD Vance and Erika Kirk arrived, or in the middle of the night. The fact that authorities knew how damaged his neck and spine were, that his heart had stopped, that they found the bullet and multiple bullet fragments—this information comes from the coroner report and the autopsy. To suggest they magically have all these details without an autopsy is disinformation.
Lauren the mortician confirmed that Kirk was autopsied as per homicide protocol. In a homicide, an autopsy is not optional. Families cannot say no, and video evidence does not replace forensic science.
Lingering Questions
Questions that remain include: Was it really Tyler Robinson? Was it really that gun found in the woods? Or was it a more simple rifle, a less powerful rifle that could have crashed into multiple vertebrae, shattered, and still killed him? Also, was there a shot taken from somewhere else? Multiple shots are not believed to have occurred, but that does not mean there were not multiple shooters.
Chris Martinson, Phil Lyman, and others give compelling information that the shot could have come from a different location. The locations they suggest would have made the shooter vulnerable and likely had cameras on them, but there are some areas at UVU that are further back from which a shot could still have been taken.
The spinal injury starts at C2 and crashes down through C6. This causes the spasm from spinal cord damage and immediately kills the heart. The bullet is found near his back at T1, and the bullet is damaged and broken. Further investigation continues with trusted sources to keep the public updated.
Video Transcript
I have new details on the Charlie Kirk
death that have not been reported
anywhere as far as I know. I've been
doing a deep dive and I want to go
through that information with you. Like
Candace Owens, I've been digging in with
witnesses, my contacts, and people close
to Charlie Kirk that I know have these
details. Yesterday, I shared exclusive
details with my audience on Lance Twig,
the furry boyfriend. go back and check
that out uh if you didn't see it. Today,
I'll go through all I've gathered on
Charlie's death. Some of it never shared
before, but right from the mouth of
people I knew would have answers. Please
make sure to like and share this because
there's millions of people out there
that are going to want to know these
answers. Uh, as you know, I've stayed
away from the big conspiracy stories.
Some of you blasted me for not going
over them. And now they've been proven
to be sexy and mysterious and and
sizzling, but completely false. So, I am
just trying to bring you the truth in
between covering other big news stories.
Now, Chris Martinsson, who's been on the
show before for the Trump Butler
shooting, did an excellent analysis in
it. He said that Charlie Kirk is
definitely shot from the front and if
only he knew where the injury began, it
would help with his analysis. I now have
that answer. I hope this will get to
Chris Martinson. I've also invited him
to come back and I hope he'll take me up
on that. Okay, here's what I've
gathered. Uh the injury to Charlie
Kirk's neck starts at the C2 neck
vertebrae. Now, many have been trying to
guess based on the bullet hole where
that was. Now, I've been able to speak
with several people uh that are
connected to law enforcement, connected
to the state of Utah, connected to
Turning Point USA. So, here's what I've
gathered. The bullet crashed through C2
3 4 5 and six. sadly completely
destroying Charlie Kirk's uh spinal
cord. This is what made him tense up.
This is what made his heart stop beating
and why gushes of blood versus squirts
of blood were coming out of him. The uh
the doctor found the main portion of the
bullet near his T1 thoracic vertebrae.
So near the spine down uh where the neck
uh vertebrae connect to the upper back
vertebrae. Now this person that I spoke
with did not know whether the bullet was
a 306. That was not shared. They just
referenced it as a bullet. Also near T1
but not next to the bullet were multiple
fragments of the bullet. Now a full
metal jacket 306 round would have gone
right through Charlie would have gone
right through the bone of Charlie. A
soft point 306 would likely have
mushroomed but caused massive amounts of
damage which we didn't see. We also know
for a fact no bullet left his body.
There was no blood spray, no blood
spatter and no hole in the banner behind
him.
Now we are believing that the bullet a
306
because of the gun that was found in the
backwoods near somebody's chicken coupe.
So, that gun had a spent casing of a
306, but we don't know with 100%
certainty that the bullet that was in
that casing is the bullet in Charlie
Kirk's neck. Okay? So, it was not
ejected. So, if this was some kind of
psy,
that bullet could have been fired or it
could have been fired somewhere else.
And all we know is that there is a
casing inside of that gun. And now we're
getting reports that it may not be a
3006 bullet that was found in his body.
So the likelihood that it is a 306
that even after smashing through his
neck uh didn't come out the back end is
very very very unlikely.
Okay. We know from past Turning Point
events that typically five 4K HD cameras
are part of the setup when they go live.
On this particular day, they did not go
live on their YouTube channel. That
shouldn't make anyone suspicious. It was
just a a business decision. However,
what we do know is that there were at
least three turning point cameras
pointed right at Charlie Kirk's body.
one from behind, one from behind to the
side, and then one in the front to his
side. Now, I was told all of that
footage has been turned over from
Turning Point to the FBI. They no longer
have that footage. They're not sharing
it with anyone. They didn't make copies
and they did not allow me to see the
footage. Everything has been handed over
to the FBI.
However, the person I spoke with
confirmed this to me and said that the
cameras were all filming in 4K.
This means that everything you and I saw
on blurry videos, grainy videos,
zoomedin videos, videos that lost their
quality or were screen shares or screen
shares of screen shares. That is not
what the FBI is looking at. They have 4K
of the situation.
So, I was told this footage will be used
because of the high quality 4K in the
upcoming trial against Tyler Robinson.
It shows the murder, death, and the
bodily damage. So, that footage is not
going to likely ever be shown to the
public. I hate to be the one to tell you
this. Even if it's shown in court, where
we're now learning it's going to be a
public open trial, they likely will not
show that on national television because
of the extreme amount of blood, uh,
gore, and how gruesome it is. But I
wanted to let you guys know, it was
confirmed, it captured in 4K, and it was
released to the FBI. Now, on the topic
of footage, remember how a Turning Point
employee showed Candace Owens the
footage? That footage may or may not be
allowed in the court case. However,
there were two others that were not
shown that I believe will be a part of
the court case. Now, I was told this
particular Turning Point USA uh employee
is extremely loyal to Charlie Kirk, a
friend, someone who has worked for
Turning Point for many, many years. So,
I'm saddened that Candace Owens brought
up his name,
you know, led led a lot of people to
have suspicious, malicious feelings
towards him. Now, I know she wasn't the
only one, but Candace needs to be very
careful because this person who she
called a friend, a past acquaintance
over and over again, is now receiving
death threats, is afraid for his life
and his family and and the FBI has
cleared him and the footage that he
grabbed was turned over to the FBI. So,
my my point in saying all of this is we
all have to be really careful. A lot of
people are putting out videos directly
accusing people of being guilty and now
when they're found to not be guilty,
it's putting their life in danger. So,
um I I also uh asked about the FBI. I
was told that the FBI is in regular
communication with Erica Kirk, but not
necessarily always in communication with
Turning Point since no one at Turning
Point is familiarly related to Charlie
Kirk. Now, whenever there is a question
or doubt or a point that needs
clarification, the FBI will reach out to
Turning Point and get the answer from
whoever they believe has the best
answer.
Now, the FBI uh is supposedly doing
their best, and we're the ones that are
being impatient. We're the ones
demanding that they release this footage
to us. Footage showing the shot. Footage
showing Tyler Robinson or whoever,
whoever, jumping up and running across
the roof. Uh we why were we given blurry
photos of somebody entering the tunnel?
I went back through my phone when I went
to UVU campus and walked the entire
crime scene. Those are new cameras. They
should be HD quality. So why were we
given blurry, grainy photos and only
when the person is kind of looking down
to the side? Now again, maybe they were
nervous. the FBI, maybe they were
nervous about putting somebody's face
out there and having what has now
happened to this Turning Point USA
employee. So, there could be reason
behind that. But there's also this idea
that is Cash Patel bungling this on
purpose or is somebody trying to set him
up? I want to share with you a clip from
Alex Jones with lawyer Ivan Rakelin, a
former Green Beret, who breaks down what
he believes is going on. Let me bring
that up to the screen. I know there's
trifa. I know a whole bunch of these
attacks have been them. And so, and I
know this this DOJ is not as corrupt and
you know, I don't think willing to do
big false flags, but maybe I'm wrong or
maybe components in it. There was
another group piggybacking on top the
trantif you at least six of them the
days before saying he'll be dead in two
days he'll be dead tomorrow then
bragging see I told you uh you got this
Zen character that you know is at all
these key events as a government
operative on record getting arrested so
the bad guy could get away I mean you
know this insane he did um and then
you've got all of it and and then you
know Candice I mean literally within
days it's like Israel because he
criticized Israel well a bunch of people
do including including myself on a lot
of issues. Um, so you bringing up
Candace Owens, I have been just
absolutely attacked for for for saying
where's the proof? We don't even know
what happened. I've got every military
guy, Green Beret, Delta Force, Army
Ranger, Navy Seal, sniper experts,
everybody says, and security experts
look at this and the behavior of the
security team. I'm not accusing people
that I believe you knew Charlie Forever
as being something weird, but that they
are all watching him. It's like they all
tense up. You have the the trans shooter
question like it's a cue. Uh and I mean
and then and then you've got them all
like it's a football play racing and
doing things that security people said
they would never do, but it's obviously
trained and something's happening,
picking up things off the ground uh and
things. So I mean instantly. So I see
preparation. I don't see deer in the
headlights here. And that's what the
Delta Force guys have said. That's what
they've all said. So, what are you
seeing here? And and why are you saying
you think Candace will come up with
whatever the best or or are you saying
she'll come up with the uh right theory?
>> Yeah. So, the first part is you I think
it's putting the cart before the horse
when you try to go after motive, right?
There's a lot of people out there with
the motive to potentially do this to
Charlie Kirk, but you can't really
there's too many hypotheses out there
when it comes to motive. You can't get
there until you find out who actually
pulled the trigger and then look at the
analysis of who they're connected to,
the financials, the relationships, the
communications, right? Let's first
figure out who actually shot him beyond
a reasonable doubt and then we can start
working that mode of component and then
lay blame, you know, if it was a broader
operation. The reason why I say Candace
Owens is because out of those with the
large the if you take a ven diagram who
has the most connections of the Charlie
Kirk ecosystem one who has the biggest
platform and who has the biggest trust
level within those several spheres that
whistleblowers and insiders will then be
comfortable providing the information
to. And I I sus my analysis tells me
that Candace Owens, if she could if
she's operating in good faith, will
likely be the repository of all data
points, videos, and evidence and
insiders and those people that she knows
over years. Totally agree. I think she
has information. So, she has the entire
paniply of evidence to then come to a
logical hypothesis of
>> I just hope she doesn't come up with her
hypothesis off of wanting to put motive
first or who's behind it.
>> That's why I mentioned that first.
Exactly.
>> Yeah. Because I mean, sure.
>> Okay. They make a great point and I
completely agree. I I believe for the
most part Candace Owens has been doing
great investigative journalist work. I
believe a lot of people trust her. I
believe she is going to be a repository
to counter whatever we see in the trial.
I completely agree with that. At the
same time,
is she sometimes looking for somebody
and then trying to build the story
versus just looking at the story and
seeing who it points to? Now, they're
going to talk about the FBI connection.
Hey friends, it's Steven Gardner here
and today I want to tell you about
something really exciting. I've just
partnered with Monetary Gold, one of the
top names in physical gold and silver.
Why? Because I believe now more than
ever, Americans need real protection.
From inflation to market volatility to
politicians spending us deeper and
deeper into debt, gold has stood the
test of time. It's not just an asset.
It's security, its independence, its
peace of mind. And Monetary Gold makes
the process simple, direct, and secure.
Here's what I want you to do. Go to
stephvenlovesgold.com.
That's stephvenlovesgold.com.
And claim your free gold IRA guide or
call 8006081770
right now to speak with a real
specialist who will answer your
questions and help you get started.
Don't wait. Protect your future with
something real.
>> Whoa. who wanted he got two and a half
million people in the last election
conservately to vote Republican. It was
expanding. Uh Soros and them were really
pissed. The left was calling for his
death everywhere. They celebrated it.
And so yeah, I'm like, "Yeah, okay.
Official story. Let's see." And then it
starts unraveling. So I said, "Okay,
looks like I don't really see how it's a
false flag. If I do, I'll see within a
few days." Well, we got questions. Oh,
30 odd six. Wow. The bullet was found
you. We basically broke that news and I
said, "I don't believe it." And then I
get a call from their spokesperson that
was there saying, "Okay, well I didn't
give you the full report. This is how it
actually happened." Trying to explain
it. And you know, he sounded reasonable,
but boy, they sure called me within 45
minutes Saturday night uh two Saturdays
ago. It was very interesting. And all of
it and and and so I just can't say
Israel, but I do see I mean I see DNC
RNC wanting to take over his
organization. Not the RNC itself, but
some subgroup. Uh, so I see D as
culprits if it wasn't a lone tracking
vote. Yeah.
>> You have the same rotten scum that was
in place at the DOJ, the FBI, our
federal law enforcement a entities, and
even at the state level that were
involved at an at a minimum to cover up
for the attempted assassinations of
Trump. Those same individuals are still
in place because Cash, Dan, and Pam,
they haven't removed most of them. So
they're the ones that are potentially
also muddying the investigation to make
Cash look like a complete buffoon.
>> Okay, they make a great point there,
right? The very people that were a part
of the Russia collusion, the 2020
election, the attempted assassinations
on President Trump, those people are
still in place. So Pam Bondi, Dan
Bonino, Cash Patel, they need to be
careful because there could be an
operation within the FBI to look like
this Charlie Kirk investigation is being
handled so that the president and Cash
Patel, friends of Charlie Kirk, can say
that this was done 100% correct. There
could also be people working to make
them look bad.
>> You're absolutely right. And and in
closing,
that's exactly what Kyle Sarapin has
been saying. We need to get him on
tomorrow, by the way, that that he
predicted all they are sabotaging going
to make them look like buffoons from
within. And you have all these little
subsections that would be able to do
this inter interlace with intelligence
agencies. And then they would put a
bunch of they would give them disinfo to
actually then have it unravel and create
all this. And looking at Butler briefly,
I've looked at the ballistics, had
experts on, you know, people were on the
ground. Feds came and threatened them
not to investigate. Um, Hagman and
others. Clearly, somebody off by the
water tower in the woods is shooting.
You see the trajectory of the bullet,
hitting bags, hitting people. So, they
were piggybacking on top of crooks. And
when crooks failed, they came into
action. So, exactly. Past behavior by
the deep state is indicative of the
future behavior. I totally agree that
bare minimum they were piggybacking.
>> Yeah, absolutely. And and again, it goes
back to what I was saying earlier that
this current leadership in the DOJ is
not serious about cleaning house and
doing President Trump's mandate, which
means they're not doing our mandate. And
it is incumbent on us to identify them
down to the individual. So, if you want
to research folks that are out there,
start scrutinizing every single person
from top down at the Department of
Justice and explaining in detail why
they must be removed. And that's what
I'm going to be focusing my efforts on.
>> All right. Uh, interesting stuff in my
opinion. I hope you found that
interesting as well. Are Cash and Dan
Bonino being set up? Are there people
below them running this investigation
that maybe didn't like Charlie Kirk?
Maybe we're not getting the full truth.
Or has this just moved from crime scene
to conviction and it'll come out in the
trial. Um I I don't really know, but uh
I do want to get to the bottom of this.
And so let me continue with the
information that I got for you guys. All
right. Now, there's a lot of people
questioning whether there was an autopsy
or a coroner's report. Somebody put out
u a dispatch saying there was no
autopsy. That's now being questioned as
was it earlier in the day. Was that AI?
Uh I have it on very good authority that
there is a 100% chance that there was an
autopsy or coroner's report and lots of
photos of Charlie Kirk's body taken. It
was explained to me that it is Utah law
that an autopsy must be performed in the
event of a homicide. It doesn't matter
whether Erica Kirk wanted one or doesn't
want one or Charlie Kirk's parents
didn't want one. It doesn't matter
because now it's the state of Utah
versus Tyler Robinson. So based on the
law and protocol for homicide in Utah,
there is a 100% chance that there was an
autopsy and that audio we are hearing is
either fake or more likely happened
earlier in the day. So there was
definitely an autopsy and I'm going to
show you a clip here in a minute and
then Lauren the mortician is going to be
coming on to my show. Now think about
this.
That autopsy could have been done after
that particular audio clip. It could
have been done that night. It could have
been done in the morning before JD Vance
and Erica Kirk arrived. It could have
been done in the middle of the night.
The fact that they knew how damaged his
neck and spine was, that his heart was
stopped, that they found the bullet and
multiple bullet fragments. You think
that they just guessed that? That is the
coroner report. That is the autopsy. So
to start putting out doubt that they
magically have all these details and
that there was no autopsy is is just
disinformation. Now listen to what
Lauren the mortician had to say and then
she'll be on the show to go into greater
detail.
>> Actually reached out to me privately.
Actually I don't think that's weird at
all. Totally normal for them to reach
out to me because this is wild. and they
told me very clearly, yes, Charlie Kirk
was autopsied as per homicide protocol,
period. End of story. They didn't want
their name out there because, let's be
honest, they don't want to get dragged
into internet chaos. But I trust this
source. I verified it myself and it
aligns with everything I know from
working in this field. In a homicide, an
autopsy isn't optional. Families can't
say no. And video evidence doesn't
replace forensic science.
>> I love that. uh video evidence does not
ever replace forensic science. So, there
was definitely an autopsy. That's how we
know all of these information, all this
information. Now, she'll be coming back
on uh to to my show, but um the the
questions that linger for me is, was it
really Tyler Robinson?
Was it really that gun that they found
in the woods? Or was it a more uh simple
rifle, a less powerful rifle like a 330
that definitely could have crashed into
multiple vertebrae and shattered and
still killed him? Also, was there a shot
taken from somewhere else? I don't
believe there were multiple shots, but
that doesn't mean there wasn't multiple
shooters. Chris Martin, uh, Phil Lyman,
others, they they give very good
information that that shot could have
come from a different location. Now, the
location they say, I believe, would have
made the shooter vulnerable and likely
had cameras on it, but there are some
areas at UVU that are further back that
I believe you could still have gotten a
shot off from. So, we know the spinal
injury starts at C2, crashes down
through C6. This causes the spasm from
spinal cord damage. Immediately kills
the heart. The bullet is found near his
back at T1 and the bullet is damaged and
broken. Now, I'll continue to do deep
research, work with my trusted sources
to continue to keep you guys updated. If
you didn't see the exclusive update in
the first five minutes of my interview
yesterday with Bianca de la Garza, go
check that out. It's in the first five
minutes. Also, if you didn't see my
exclusive interview with Andrew Kvet,
spokesman for TurningPoint USA, I'm
going to link that right here at the end
of this video. If you found this
helpful, give it a like. Please share it
with family and friends. I spent a lot
of time gathering this exclusive
information for you. I hope you enjoyed
it. Stay amazing, stay safe, and I will
see you on the next video.