Up Next
Candace Owens Exposes New Evidence in Charlie Kirk Investigation and Challenges Turning Point USA
49:35
Candace Owens Uncovers FBI Hidden Footage of Woman With Charlie Kirk's Shooter at Utah State University
51:29
Phil Lyman Shares Eyewitness Account of Charlie Kirk Shooting: Bombshell Details Nobody Is Discussing
44:23
The Injury Details No One Else Has Reported
Exclusive information has emerged regarding the death of Charlie Kirk. Through direct conversations with people connected to law enforcement, the state of Utah, and Turning Point USA, critical details about Kirk's injuries have come to light that answer questions many analysts have been asking.
The injury to Kirk's neck begins at the C2 cervical vertebrae. The bullet crashed through C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6, completely destroying Kirk's spinal cord. This catastrophic spinal damage is what caused him to tense up and what made his heart stop beating. It also explains why gushes of blood rather than squirts of blood were coming from him.
The doctor found the main portion of the bullet near Kirk's T1 thoracic vertebrae, near the spine where the neck vertebrae connect to the upper back vertebrae. The source did not confirm whether the bullet was a .30-06 round. They simply referenced it as "a bullet." Also near T1, but not next to the bullet itself, were multiple fragments of the bullet.
Questions About Bullet Type and Trajectory
A full metal jacket .30-06 round would have gone right through Kirk and right through bone. A soft point .30-06 would likely have mushroomed but caused massive amounts of damage, which was not observed. No bullet exited his body. There was no blood spray, no blood spatter, and no hole in the banner behind him.
The assumption that it was a .30-06 comes from the gun found in the backwoods near someone's chicken coop. That gun had a spent casing of a .30-06, but there is no 100% certainty that the bullet in that casing is the bullet found in Kirk's neck. The casing was not ejected. If this was some kind of setup, that bullet could have been fired elsewhere, and all that is known for certain is that there is a casing inside that gun.
Reports are emerging that it may not be a .30-06 bullet that was found in his body. The likelihood that a .30-06, even after smashing through his neck, didn't come out the back end is very unlikely. Some are questioning whether it could have been a simpler rifle, a less powerful one like a .223, which definitely could have crashed into multiple vertebrae, shattered, and still been lethal.
The 4K Footage Turned Over to the FBI
From past Turning Point events, typically five 4K HD cameras are part of the setup when they go live. On this particular day, they did not go live on their YouTube channel, though this was simply a business decision and should not raise suspicion.
What is known is that there were at least three Turning Point cameras pointed right at Kirk's body: one from behind, one from behind to the side, and one in the front to his side. All of that footage has been turned over from Turning Point to the FBI. They no longer have that footage. They are not sharing it with anyone. They did not make copies, and they did not allow access to view the footage.
The cameras were all filming in 4K. This means that everything the public has seen on blurry videos, grainy videos, zoomed-in videos, videos that lost their quality, or screen shares of screen shares is not what the FBI is looking at. They have 4K footage of the situation.
This footage will be used because of the high quality 4K in the upcoming trial against Tyler Robinson. It shows the murder, death, and bodily damage. That footage is not likely ever going to be shown to the public. Even if it is shown in court, where it appears there will be a public open trial, it likely will not be shown on national television because of the extreme amount of blood, gore, and how gruesome it is.
Turning Point Employee Receives Death Threats
A Turning Point USA employee showed Candace Owens some footage. That footage may or may not be allowed in the court case. However, there were two others that were not shown that are believed will be part of the court case.
This particular Turning Point USA employee is extremely loyal to Kirk, a friend who has worked for Turning Point for many years. Candace Owens brought up his name, which led many people to have suspicious, malicious feelings toward him. She was not the only one, but Candace needs to be very careful because this person, whom she called a friend and past acquaintance repeatedly, is now receiving death threats and is afraid for his life and his family. The FBI has cleared him, and the footage he grabbed was turned over to the FBI.
Many people are putting out videos directly accusing people of being guilty, and now when they are found to not be guilty, it is putting their lives in danger.
FBI Communication and Investigation Concerns
The FBI is in regular communication with Erika Kirk, but not necessarily always in communication with Turning Point, since no one at Turning Point is familiarly related to Kirk. Whenever there is a question or doubt or a point that needs clarification, the FBI will reach out to Turning Point and get the answer from whoever they believe has the best answer.
The FBI is supposedly doing their best, and the public is being impatient, demanding that they release footage showing the shot, footage showing Tyler Robinson or whoever jumping up and running across the roof. Questions remain about why blurry photos of somebody entering the tunnel were released when those are new cameras that should be HD quality. Perhaps the FBI was nervous about putting somebody's face out there and having what has now happened to the Turning Point USA employee happen to others. But there is also the question: Is Kash Patel bungling this on purpose, or is somebody trying to set him up?
Deep State Sabotage or Legitimate Investigation?
Attorney Ivan Raiklin, a former Green Beret, joined Alex Jones to discuss what he believes is happening. Raiklin pointed out that the same individuals who were in place at the DOJ and FBI during the Russia collusion investigation, the 2020 election, and the attempted assassinations of President Trump are still in place. Kash Patel, Dan Bongino, and Pam Bondi have not removed most of them. These individuals could potentially be muddying the investigation to make Patel look like a complete buffoon, or they could be part of an operation to ensure the investigation looks legitimate while concealing the truth.
Raiklin advised against putting the cart before the horse by trying to go after motive. There are many people with a motive to potentially harm Kirk, but there are too many hypotheses when it comes to motive. The focus should be on finding out who actually pulled the trigger beyond a reasonable doubt, then working the motive component and laying blame if it was a broader operation.
He noted that Candace Owens, if operating in good faith, has the most connections within the Kirk ecosystem, the biggest platform, and the biggest trust level within those spheres. Whistleblowers and insiders will likely be comfortable providing information to her. She will likely be the repository of all data points, videos, evidence, and insider information from people she has known over the years. However, there is concern that she may sometimes look for somebody and then try to build the story, versus just looking at the story and seeing who it points to.
The Autopsy Did Happen
Many people are questioning whether there was an autopsy or coroner's report. Someone put out a dispatch saying there was no autopsy. That is now being questioned as to whether it was earlier in the day or AI-generated.
There is a 100% chance that there was an autopsy or coroner's report and lots of photos of Kirk's body taken. It is Utah law that an autopsy must be performed in the event of a homicide. It does not matter whether Erika Kirk wanted one or Kirk's parents did not want one. It does not matter because now it is the state of Utah versus Tyler Robinson. Based on the law and protocol for homicide in Utah, there is a 100% chance that there was an autopsy.
The autopsy could have been done after any particular audio clip circulating online. It could have been done that night, in the morning before JD Vance and Erika Kirk arrived, or in the middle of the night. The fact that authorities knew how damaged his neck and spine were, that his heart had stopped, that they found the bullet and multiple bullet fragments—this information comes from the coroner report and the autopsy. To suggest they magically have all these details without an autopsy is disinformation.
Lauren the mortician confirmed that Kirk was autopsied as per homicide protocol. In a homicide, an autopsy is not optional. Families cannot say no, and video evidence does not replace forensic science.
Lingering Questions
Questions that remain include: Was it really Tyler Robinson? Was it really that gun found in the woods? Or was it a more simple rifle, a less powerful rifle that could have crashed into multiple vertebrae, shattered, and still killed him? Also, was there a shot taken from somewhere else? Multiple shots are not believed to have occurred, but that does not mean there were not multiple shooters.
Chris Martinson, Phil Lyman, and others give compelling information that the shot could have come from a different location. The locations they suggest would have made the shooter vulnerable and likely had cameras on them, but there are some areas at UVU that are further back from which a shot could still have been taken.
The spinal injury starts at C2 and crashes down through C6. This causes the spasm from spinal cord damage and immediately kills the heart. The bullet is found near his back at T1, and the bullet is damaged and broken. Further investigation continues with trusted sources to keep the public updated.
Video Transcript
[00:00] I have new details on the Charlie Kirk
[00:03] death that have not been reported
[00:05] anywhere as far as I know. I've been
[00:07] doing a deep dive and I want to go
[00:09] through that information with you. Like
[00:11] Candace Owens, I've been digging in with
[00:14] witnesses, my contacts, and people close
[00:17] to Charlie Kirk that I know have these
[00:19] details. Yesterday, I shared exclusive
[00:23] details with my audience on Lance Twig,
[00:26] the furry boyfriend. go back and check
[00:29] that out uh if you didn't see it. Today,
[00:32] I'll go through all I've gathered on
[00:35] Charlie's death. Some of it never shared
[00:37] before, but right from the mouth of
[00:40] people I knew would have answers. Please
[00:43] make sure to like and share this because
[00:45] there's millions of people out there
[00:47] that are going to want to know these
[00:49] answers. Uh, as you know, I've stayed
[00:51] away from the big conspiracy stories.
[00:54] Some of you blasted me for not going
[00:56] over them. And now they've been proven
[00:59] to be sexy and mysterious and and
[01:03] sizzling, but completely false. So, I am
[01:06] just trying to bring you the truth in
[01:08] between covering other big news stories.
[01:11] Now, Chris Martinsson, who's been on the
[01:13] show before for the Trump Butler
[01:16] shooting, did an excellent analysis in
[01:19] it. He said that Charlie Kirk is
[01:21] definitely shot from the front and if
[01:23] only he knew where the injury began, it
[01:26] would help with his analysis. I now have
[01:28] that answer. I hope this will get to
[01:30] Chris Martinson. I've also invited him
[01:32] to come back and I hope he'll take me up
[01:35] on that. Okay, here's what I've
[01:36] gathered. Uh the injury to Charlie
[01:40] Kirk's neck starts at the C2 neck
[01:43] vertebrae. Now, many have been trying to
[01:46] guess based on the bullet hole where
[01:50] that was. Now, I've been able to speak
[01:52] with several people uh that are
[01:56] connected to law enforcement, connected
[01:58] to the state of Utah, connected to
[02:00] Turning Point USA. So, here's what I've
[02:03] gathered. The bullet crashed through C2
[02:07] 3 4 5 and six. sadly completely
[02:11] destroying Charlie Kirk's uh spinal
[02:15] cord. This is what made him tense up.
[02:17] This is what made his heart stop beating
[02:20] and why gushes of blood versus squirts
[02:23] of blood were coming out of him. The uh
[02:26] the doctor found the main portion of the
[02:31] bullet near his T1 thoracic vertebrae.
[02:35] So near the spine down uh where the neck
[02:40] uh vertebrae connect to the upper back
[02:44] vertebrae. Now this person that I spoke
[02:47] with did not know whether the bullet was
[02:51] a 306. That was not shared. They just
[02:55] referenced it as a bullet. Also near T1
[03:00] but not next to the bullet were multiple
[03:03] fragments of the bullet. Now a full
[03:07] metal jacket 306 round would have gone
[03:10] right through Charlie would have gone
[03:12] right through the bone of Charlie. A
[03:15] soft point 306 would likely have
[03:18] mushroomed but caused massive amounts of
[03:21] damage which we didn't see. We also know
[03:24] for a fact no bullet left his body.
[03:27] There was no blood spray, no blood
[03:30] spatter and no hole in the banner behind
[03:33] him.
[03:34] Now we are believing that the bullet a
[03:38] 306
[03:40] because of the gun that was found in the
[03:44] backwoods near somebody's chicken coupe.
[03:47] So, that gun had a spent casing of a
[03:53] 306, but we don't know with 100%
[03:56] certainty that the bullet that was in
[03:59] that casing is the bullet in Charlie
[04:01] Kirk's neck. Okay? So, it was not
[04:04] ejected. So, if this was some kind of
[04:07] psy,
[04:08] that bullet could have been fired or it
[04:11] could have been fired somewhere else.
[04:12] And all we know is that there is a
[04:14] casing inside of that gun. And now we're
[04:19] getting reports that it may not be a
[04:21] 3006 bullet that was found in his body.
[04:25] So the likelihood that it is a 306
[04:28] that even after smashing through his
[04:31] neck uh didn't come out the back end is
[04:34] very very very unlikely.
[04:37] Okay. We know from past Turning Point
[04:40] events that typically five 4K HD cameras
[04:46] are part of the setup when they go live.
[04:49] On this particular day, they did not go
[04:52] live on their YouTube channel. That
[04:54] shouldn't make anyone suspicious. It was
[04:56] just a a business decision. However,
[04:59] what we do know is that there were at
[05:01] least three turning point cameras
[05:04] pointed right at Charlie Kirk's body.
[05:06] one from behind, one from behind to the
[05:10] side, and then one in the front to his
[05:13] side. Now, I was told all of that
[05:16] footage has been turned over from
[05:19] Turning Point to the FBI. They no longer
[05:22] have that footage. They're not sharing
[05:24] it with anyone. They didn't make copies
[05:27] and they did not allow me to see the
[05:29] footage. Everything has been handed over
[05:32] to the FBI.
[05:34] However, the person I spoke with
[05:37] confirmed this to me and said that the
[05:40] cameras were all filming in 4K.
[05:44] This means that everything you and I saw
[05:47] on blurry videos, grainy videos,
[05:51] zoomedin videos, videos that lost their
[05:54] quality or were screen shares or screen
[05:57] shares of screen shares. That is not
[05:59] what the FBI is looking at. They have 4K
[06:04] of the situation.
[06:06] So, I was told this footage will be used
[06:09] because of the high quality 4K in the
[06:12] upcoming trial against Tyler Robinson.
[06:16] It shows the murder, death, and the
[06:18] bodily damage. So, that footage is not
[06:21] going to likely ever be shown to the
[06:24] public. I hate to be the one to tell you
[06:26] this. Even if it's shown in court, where
[06:29] we're now learning it's going to be a
[06:31] public open trial, they likely will not
[06:34] show that on national television because
[06:36] of the extreme amount of blood, uh,
[06:39] gore, and how gruesome it is. But I
[06:42] wanted to let you guys know, it was
[06:44] confirmed, it captured in 4K, and it was
[06:47] released to the FBI. Now, on the topic
[06:50] of footage, remember how a Turning Point
[06:53] employee showed Candace Owens the
[06:55] footage? That footage may or may not be
[06:58] allowed in the court case. However,
[07:01] there were two others that were not
[07:03] shown that I believe will be a part of
[07:06] the court case. Now, I was told this
[07:09] particular Turning Point USA uh employee
[07:12] is extremely loyal to Charlie Kirk, a
[07:15] friend, someone who has worked for
[07:17] Turning Point for many, many years. So,
[07:20] I'm saddened that Candace Owens brought
[07:23] up his name,
[07:25] you know, led led a lot of people to
[07:27] have suspicious, malicious feelings
[07:30] towards him. Now, I know she wasn't the
[07:32] only one, but Candace needs to be very
[07:35] careful because this person who she
[07:37] called a friend, a past acquaintance
[07:40] over and over again, is now receiving
[07:42] death threats, is afraid for his life
[07:45] and his family and and the FBI has
[07:48] cleared him and the footage that he
[07:50] grabbed was turned over to the FBI. So,
[07:53] my my point in saying all of this is we
[07:56] all have to be really careful. A lot of
[07:58] people are putting out videos directly
[08:00] accusing people of being guilty and now
[08:04] when they're found to not be guilty,
[08:06] it's putting their life in danger. So,
[08:09] um I I also uh asked about the FBI. I
[08:14] was told that the FBI is in regular
[08:16] communication with Erica Kirk, but not
[08:19] necessarily always in communication with
[08:22] Turning Point since no one at Turning
[08:24] Point is familiarly related to Charlie
[08:28] Kirk. Now, whenever there is a question
[08:32] or doubt or a point that needs
[08:34] clarification, the FBI will reach out to
[08:36] Turning Point and get the answer from
[08:39] whoever they believe has the best
[08:41] answer.
[08:43] Now, the FBI uh is supposedly doing
[08:46] their best, and we're the ones that are
[08:50] being impatient. We're the ones
[08:52] demanding that they release this footage
[08:55] to us. Footage showing the shot. Footage
[08:59] showing Tyler Robinson or whoever,
[09:01] whoever, jumping up and running across
[09:04] the roof. Uh we why were we given blurry
[09:08] photos of somebody entering the tunnel?
[09:12] I went back through my phone when I went
[09:14] to UVU campus and walked the entire
[09:17] crime scene. Those are new cameras. They
[09:20] should be HD quality. So why were we
[09:23] given blurry, grainy photos and only
[09:27] when the person is kind of looking down
[09:29] to the side? Now again, maybe they were
[09:32] nervous. the FBI, maybe they were
[09:35] nervous about putting somebody's face
[09:37] out there and having what has now
[09:39] happened to this Turning Point USA
[09:42] employee. So, there could be reason
[09:44] behind that. But there's also this idea
[09:49] that is Cash Patel bungling this on
[09:51] purpose or is somebody trying to set him
[09:54] up? I want to share with you a clip from
[09:57] Alex Jones with lawyer Ivan Rakelin, a
[10:00] former Green Beret, who breaks down what
[10:04] he believes is going on. Let me bring
[10:06] that up to the screen. I know there's
[10:08] trifa. I know a whole bunch of these
[10:09] attacks have been them. And so, and I
[10:12] know this this DOJ is not as corrupt and
[10:14] you know, I don't think willing to do
[10:16] big false flags, but maybe I'm wrong or
[10:19] maybe components in it. There was
[10:20] another group piggybacking on top the
[10:23] trantif you at least six of them the
[10:25] days before saying he'll be dead in two
[10:27] days he'll be dead tomorrow then
[10:28] bragging see I told you uh you got this
[10:30] Zen character that you know is at all
[10:32] these key events as a government
[10:33] operative on record getting arrested so
[10:36] the bad guy could get away I mean you
[10:38] know this insane he did um and then
[10:41] you've got all of it and and then you
[10:44] know Candice I mean literally within
[10:46] days it's like Israel because he
[10:47] criticized Israel well a bunch of people
[10:49] do including including myself on a lot
[10:50] of issues. Um, so you bringing up
[10:54] Candace Owens, I have been just
[10:56] absolutely attacked for for for saying
[10:59] where's the proof? We don't even know
[11:01] what happened. I've got every military
[11:03] guy, Green Beret, Delta Force, Army
[11:06] Ranger, Navy Seal, sniper experts,
[11:10] everybody says, and security experts
[11:12] look at this and the behavior of the
[11:14] security team. I'm not accusing people
[11:15] that I believe you knew Charlie Forever
[11:17] as being something weird, but that they
[11:19] are all watching him. It's like they all
[11:21] tense up. You have the the trans shooter
[11:24] question like it's a cue. Uh and I mean
[11:28] and then and then you've got them all
[11:30] like it's a football play racing and
[11:31] doing things that security people said
[11:33] they would never do, but it's obviously
[11:34] trained and something's happening,
[11:36] picking up things off the ground uh and
[11:38] things. So I mean instantly. So I see
[11:42] preparation. I don't see deer in the
[11:44] headlights here. And that's what the
[11:45] Delta Force guys have said. That's what
[11:47] they've all said. So, what are you
[11:49] seeing here? And and why are you saying
[11:50] you think Candace will come up with
[11:52] whatever the best or or are you saying
[11:54] she'll come up with the uh right theory?
[11:58] >> Yeah. So, the first part is you I think
[12:00] it's putting the cart before the horse
[12:01] when you try to go after motive, right?
[12:04] There's a lot of people out there with
[12:05] the motive to potentially do this to
[12:07] Charlie Kirk, but you can't really
[12:09] there's too many hypotheses out there
[12:11] when it comes to motive. You can't get
[12:13] there until you find out who actually
[12:16] pulled the trigger and then look at the
[12:18] analysis of who they're connected to,
[12:20] the financials, the relationships, the
[12:22] communications, right? Let's first
[12:24] figure out who actually shot him beyond
[12:26] a reasonable doubt and then we can start
[12:28] working that mode of component and then
[12:30] lay blame, you know, if it was a broader
[12:32] operation. The reason why I say Candace
[12:34] Owens is because out of those with the
[12:36] large the if you take a ven diagram who
[12:40] has the most connections of the Charlie
[12:43] Kirk ecosystem one who has the biggest
[12:45] platform and who has the biggest trust
[12:48] level within those several spheres that
[12:51] whistleblowers and insiders will then be
[12:54] comfortable providing the information
[12:56] to. And I I sus my analysis tells me
[12:59] that Candace Owens, if she could if
[13:01] she's operating in good faith, will
[13:03] likely be the repository of all data
[13:07] points, videos, and evidence and
[13:10] insiders and those people that she knows
[13:13] over years. Totally agree. I think she
[13:15] has information. So, she has the entire
[13:18] paniply of evidence to then come to a
[13:21] logical hypothesis of
[13:22] >> I just hope she doesn't come up with her
[13:24] hypothesis off of wanting to put motive
[13:26] first or who's behind it.
[13:29] >> That's why I mentioned that first.
[13:30] Exactly.
[13:32] >> Yeah. Because I mean, sure.
[13:35] >> Okay. They make a great point and I
[13:36] completely agree. I I believe for the
[13:38] most part Candace Owens has been doing
[13:40] great investigative journalist work. I
[13:44] believe a lot of people trust her. I
[13:46] believe she is going to be a repository
[13:49] to counter whatever we see in the trial.
[13:51] I completely agree with that. At the
[13:54] same time,
[13:56] is she sometimes looking for somebody
[13:57] and then trying to build the story
[13:59] versus just looking at the story and
[14:01] seeing who it points to? Now, they're
[14:03] going to talk about the FBI connection.
[14:06] Hey friends, it's Steven Gardner here
[14:08] and today I want to tell you about
[14:09] something really exciting. I've just
[14:11] partnered with Monetary Gold, one of the
[14:14] top names in physical gold and silver.
[14:16] Why? Because I believe now more than
[14:19] ever, Americans need real protection.
[14:22] From inflation to market volatility to
[14:25] politicians spending us deeper and
[14:27] deeper into debt, gold has stood the
[14:30] test of time. It's not just an asset.
[14:33] It's security, its independence, its
[14:36] peace of mind. And Monetary Gold makes
[14:38] the process simple, direct, and secure.
[14:41] Here's what I want you to do. Go to
[14:43] stephvenlovesgold.com.
[14:45] That's stephvenlovesgold.com.
[14:47] And claim your free gold IRA guide or
[14:51] call 8006081770
[14:55] right now to speak with a real
[14:57] specialist who will answer your
[14:59] questions and help you get started.
[15:01] Don't wait. Protect your future with
[15:03] something real.
[15:04] >> Whoa. who wanted he got two and a half
[15:07] million people in the last election
[15:08] conservately to vote Republican. It was
[15:10] expanding. Uh Soros and them were really
[15:13] pissed. The left was calling for his
[15:15] death everywhere. They celebrated it.
[15:17] And so yeah, I'm like, "Yeah, okay.
[15:19] Official story. Let's see." And then it
[15:21] starts unraveling. So I said, "Okay,
[15:23] looks like I don't really see how it's a
[15:24] false flag. If I do, I'll see within a
[15:26] few days." Well, we got questions. Oh,
[15:27] 30 odd six. Wow. The bullet was found
[15:30] you. We basically broke that news and I
[15:32] said, "I don't believe it." And then I
[15:33] get a call from their spokesperson that
[15:35] was there saying, "Okay, well I didn't
[15:36] give you the full report. This is how it
[15:38] actually happened." Trying to explain
[15:39] it. And you know, he sounded reasonable,
[15:40] but boy, they sure called me within 45
[15:42] minutes Saturday night uh two Saturdays
[15:44] ago. It was very interesting. And all of
[15:47] it and and and so I just can't say
[15:49] Israel, but I do see I mean I see DNC
[15:53] RNC wanting to take over his
[15:54] organization. Not the RNC itself, but
[15:56] some subgroup. Uh, so I see D as
[15:59] culprits if it wasn't a lone tracking
[16:02] vote. Yeah.
[16:03] >> You have the same rotten scum that was
[16:06] in place at the DOJ, the FBI, our
[16:08] federal law enforcement a entities, and
[16:11] even at the state level that were
[16:13] involved at an at a minimum to cover up
[16:15] for the attempted assassinations of
[16:17] Trump. Those same individuals are still
[16:19] in place because Cash, Dan, and Pam,
[16:21] they haven't removed most of them. So
[16:23] they're the ones that are potentially
[16:25] also muddying the investigation to make
[16:28] Cash look like a complete buffoon.
[16:31] >> Okay, they make a great point there,
[16:34] right? The very people that were a part
[16:37] of the Russia collusion, the 2020
[16:41] election, the attempted assassinations
[16:44] on President Trump, those people are
[16:47] still in place. So Pam Bondi, Dan
[16:50] Bonino, Cash Patel, they need to be
[16:52] careful because there could be an
[16:54] operation within the FBI to look like
[16:57] this Charlie Kirk investigation is being
[17:00] handled so that the president and Cash
[17:03] Patel, friends of Charlie Kirk, can say
[17:06] that this was done 100% correct. There
[17:09] could also be people working to make
[17:11] them look bad.
[17:14] >> You're absolutely right. And and in
[17:16] closing,
[17:18] that's exactly what Kyle Sarapin has
[17:19] been saying. We need to get him on
[17:20] tomorrow, by the way, that that he
[17:23] predicted all they are sabotaging going
[17:25] to make them look like buffoons from
[17:26] within. And you have all these little
[17:28] subsections that would be able to do
[17:30] this inter interlace with intelligence
[17:32] agencies. And then they would put a
[17:35] bunch of they would give them disinfo to
[17:37] actually then have it unravel and create
[17:40] all this. And looking at Butler briefly,
[17:43] I've looked at the ballistics, had
[17:44] experts on, you know, people were on the
[17:46] ground. Feds came and threatened them
[17:48] not to investigate. Um, Hagman and
[17:50] others. Clearly, somebody off by the
[17:52] water tower in the woods is shooting.
[17:54] You see the trajectory of the bullet,
[17:55] hitting bags, hitting people. So, they
[17:57] were piggybacking on top of crooks. And
[18:00] when crooks failed, they came into
[18:02] action. So, exactly. Past behavior by
[18:05] the deep state is indicative of the
[18:06] future behavior. I totally agree that
[18:08] bare minimum they were piggybacking.
[18:12] >> Yeah, absolutely. And and again, it goes
[18:14] back to what I was saying earlier that
[18:16] this current leadership in the DOJ is
[18:19] not serious about cleaning house and
[18:21] doing President Trump's mandate, which
[18:24] means they're not doing our mandate. And
[18:26] it is incumbent on us to identify them
[18:29] down to the individual. So, if you want
[18:31] to research folks that are out there,
[18:33] start scrutinizing every single person
[18:35] from top down at the Department of
[18:38] Justice and explaining in detail why
[18:40] they must be removed. And that's what
[18:42] I'm going to be focusing my efforts on.
[18:44] >> All right. Uh, interesting stuff in my
[18:46] opinion. I hope you found that
[18:48] interesting as well. Are Cash and Dan
[18:50] Bonino being set up? Are there people
[18:52] below them running this investigation
[18:55] that maybe didn't like Charlie Kirk?
[18:58] Maybe we're not getting the full truth.
[18:59] Or has this just moved from crime scene
[19:02] to conviction and it'll come out in the
[19:04] trial. Um I I don't really know, but uh
[19:08] I do want to get to the bottom of this.
[19:11] And so let me continue with the
[19:13] information that I got for you guys. All
[19:15] right. Now, there's a lot of people
[19:18] questioning whether there was an autopsy
[19:21] or a coroner's report. Somebody put out
[19:24] u a dispatch saying there was no
[19:27] autopsy. That's now being questioned as
[19:30] was it earlier in the day. Was that AI?
[19:34] Uh I have it on very good authority that
[19:37] there is a 100% chance that there was an
[19:40] autopsy or coroner's report and lots of
[19:43] photos of Charlie Kirk's body taken. It
[19:47] was explained to me that it is Utah law
[19:50] that an autopsy must be performed in the
[19:54] event of a homicide. It doesn't matter
[19:56] whether Erica Kirk wanted one or doesn't
[20:00] want one or Charlie Kirk's parents
[20:02] didn't want one. It doesn't matter
[20:04] because now it's the state of Utah
[20:06] versus Tyler Robinson. So based on the
[20:09] law and protocol for homicide in Utah,
[20:13] there is a 100% chance that there was an
[20:17] autopsy and that audio we are hearing is
[20:20] either fake or more likely happened
[20:23] earlier in the day. So there was
[20:26] definitely an autopsy and I'm going to
[20:29] show you a clip here in a minute and
[20:30] then Lauren the mortician is going to be
[20:33] coming on to my show. Now think about
[20:37] this.
[20:38] That autopsy could have been done after
[20:41] that particular audio clip. It could
[20:44] have been done that night. It could have
[20:46] been done in the morning before JD Vance
[20:48] and Erica Kirk arrived. It could have
[20:50] been done in the middle of the night.
[20:52] The fact that they knew how damaged his
[20:54] neck and spine was, that his heart was
[20:58] stopped, that they found the bullet and
[21:00] multiple bullet fragments. You think
[21:02] that they just guessed that? That is the
[21:05] coroner report. That is the autopsy. So
[21:08] to start putting out doubt that they
[21:11] magically have all these details and
[21:14] that there was no autopsy is is just
[21:17] disinformation. Now listen to what
[21:19] Lauren the mortician had to say and then
[21:21] she'll be on the show to go into greater
[21:23] detail.
[21:24] >> Actually reached out to me privately.
[21:26] Actually I don't think that's weird at
[21:28] all. Totally normal for them to reach
[21:29] out to me because this is wild. and they
[21:31] told me very clearly, yes, Charlie Kirk
[21:34] was autopsied as per homicide protocol,
[21:37] period. End of story. They didn't want
[21:39] their name out there because, let's be
[21:40] honest, they don't want to get dragged
[21:42] into internet chaos. But I trust this
[21:44] source. I verified it myself and it
[21:46] aligns with everything I know from
[21:48] working in this field. In a homicide, an
[21:50] autopsy isn't optional. Families can't
[21:53] say no. And video evidence doesn't
[21:56] replace forensic science.
[21:57] >> I love that. uh video evidence does not
[22:01] ever replace forensic science. So, there
[22:04] was definitely an autopsy. That's how we
[22:07] know all of these information, all this
[22:09] information. Now, she'll be coming back
[22:11] on uh to to my show, but um the the
[22:16] questions that linger for me is, was it
[22:18] really Tyler Robinson?
[22:20] Was it really that gun that they found
[22:23] in the woods? Or was it a more uh simple
[22:27] rifle, a less powerful rifle like a 330
[22:32] that definitely could have crashed into
[22:34] multiple vertebrae and shattered and
[22:38] still killed him? Also, was there a shot
[22:41] taken from somewhere else? I don't
[22:43] believe there were multiple shots, but
[22:45] that doesn't mean there wasn't multiple
[22:47] shooters. Chris Martin, uh, Phil Lyman,
[22:51] others, they they give very good
[22:54] information that that shot could have
[22:56] come from a different location. Now, the
[22:58] location they say, I believe, would have
[23:01] made the shooter vulnerable and likely
[23:03] had cameras on it, but there are some
[23:05] areas at UVU that are further back that
[23:08] I believe you could still have gotten a
[23:10] shot off from. So, we know the spinal
[23:13] injury starts at C2, crashes down
[23:15] through C6. This causes the spasm from
[23:19] spinal cord damage. Immediately kills
[23:22] the heart. The bullet is found near his
[23:25] back at T1 and the bullet is damaged and
[23:28] broken. Now, I'll continue to do deep
[23:31] research, work with my trusted sources
[23:34] to continue to keep you guys updated. If
[23:37] you didn't see the exclusive update in
[23:39] the first five minutes of my interview
[23:41] yesterday with Bianca de la Garza, go
[23:44] check that out. It's in the first five
[23:46] minutes. Also, if you didn't see my
[23:49] exclusive interview with Andrew Kvet,
[23:52] spokesman for TurningPoint USA, I'm
[23:55] going to link that right here at the end
[23:57] of this video. If you found this
[23:59] helpful, give it a like. Please share it
[24:01] with family and friends. I spent a lot
[24:03] of time gathering this exclusive
[24:05] information for you. I hope you enjoyed
[24:07] it. Stay amazing, stay safe, and I will
[24:10] see you on the next video.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.