James Klug Investigates Turning Point USA Campus Clash at Long Beach State University
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Nick Shirley Responds to Candace Owens Criticism Over Brazilian Favela Journalism and Charlie Kirk Assassination Coverage
3:47
Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens Launch Turning Point UK to Fight Cultural Marxism Across British Universities
1:16:18
Tucker Carlson Exposes Congressional Resolution Targeting Candace Owens and Online Critics of Israel Policy
10:49
James Klug Investigates Turning Point USA Campus Clash at Long Beach State University
James Klug documents a Turning Point USA Campus Clash event at Long Beach State University, where protestors and supporters clash over free speech and hate speech. As James interviews students on both sides, university officials remain tight-lipped about the speaker, while masked protestors confront Trump supporters and event attendees. The confrontation escalates when protestors throw objects at James and other attendees, sparking a heated debate about legal immigration, fascism, and the boundaries of free speech on college campuses.
October 25, 2018
Investigating the Event
James Klug arrives at Long Beach State University to cover a Turning Point USA Campus Clash event that has generated significant controversy on campus. The university president sent out email blasts informing students about the event and their right to protest, but when James approached her to ask who the speaker would be, she refused to provide that information. His attempts to get answers from the sociology department proved equally fruitless, with staff members redirecting him to LGBTQ events rather than addressing his questions about the evening's speaker.
Protestor Perspectives
James encounters students waiting to protest the event. One protestor explains their frustration with what they perceive as unequal treatment on campus, claiming that when they protest injustices, they face police officers who openly carry weapons, flash them, smile, and laugh at them. This protestor chooses an "agitation form of protest" rather than attending the event's Q&A session, arguing that when right-wing political groups with wealthy backing come to campus, they receive protection that other groups don't.
Another student admits they haven't heard any of Charlie Kirk's speeches but believes he is connected to hate speech based on what they've read. This student draws a distinction between hate speech and free speech, dismissing conservative arguments about public institutions needing to allow all voices as "rehearsed rhetoric." When asked for specific examples of hate speech, the student struggles to provide concrete instances, stating that "hate speech is irrational speech" with limits that distinguish it from free speech.
The Immigration Debate
The protestors chant slogans like "immigrants are welcome here," which James finds ironic since he notes that approximately 85% of Americans support legal immigration. An interesting exchange occurs when one protestor argues that Mexicans were on the land before settlement was established, claiming it "historically and culturally belongs to the Mexican people and Mexican people as in the mestizo race" formed when Spaniards came and "infiltrated and raped all the Native Americans."
A particularly compelling perspective comes from a student who was born in a communist country and came to America as a political refugee at age two. This immigrant expresses shock that people are fighting for the very system their family fled, noting the irony that protestors keep saying immigrants have a place while not understanding the difference between legal and illegal immigration. They emphasize the importance of knowing who enters the country and ensuring shared values.
Violence Erupts
The protest turns physical when objects are thrown at attendees. James himself is hit in the face, and his camera is knocked off its stick. He notes that protestors threw a stink bomb in his hood and what he describes as "dangerous Antifa pink chalk." The assault raises questions about the protestors' methods, with James pointing out a stark difference between the Trump supporters, none of whom have covered faces, and many protestors who are masked—suggesting they may be "possibly violent" and don't want to be identified if "something happens."
Trump Supporter Testimony
James speaks with Trump supporters attending the event, including one enthusiastic supporter who loves Trump because "he actually doesn't just say things, actually makes it happen." This supporter references Trump keeping campaign promises, even citing a CNN article titled "Trump the Keeper of Promises," which they found particularly satisfying given CNN's typically critical coverage of the president.
The Free Speech Paradox
Throughout the event, a central irony emerges: protestors claim to support free speech while attempting to shut down the event through intimidation and violence. One protestor refers to Turning Point USA as fascists, yet the protestors themselves employ tactics of masking their identities and throwing objects at people recording them. When asked if Charlie Kirk should be allowed on campus, one student believes he shouldn't because they consider his views "hate speech," though they admit to never having actually heard him speak or knowing much about Candace Owens.
The event highlights the ongoing tension on college campuses between competing visions of free speech, the challenge of distinguishing between offensive speech and hate speech, and the question of whether public universities should platform all viewpoints or draw lines based on perceived harm. It also reveals how students on both sides often operate on assumptions and secondhand information rather than direct engagement with opposing viewpoints.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.