Jesse Weber and Bobby Chacon Examine the Secret Service Failures in the Donald Trump Assassination Attempt

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Former FBI Agent Analyzes Tyler Robinson Case and Charlie Kirk Security Failures

Former FBI Agent Analyzes Tyler Robinson Case and Charlie Kirk Security Failures

7:17

Lee Smith Exposes Russia Gate as a Nonviolent Coup Attempt Against Donald Trump's Presidency

Lee Smith Exposes Russia Gate as a Nonviolent Coup Attempt Against Donald Trump's Presidency

5:53

Former Illinois State University Teaching Assistant Derek Lopez Arrested After Threatening Charlie Kirk Supporters and Making Violent Social Media Posts

Former Illinois State University Teaching Assistant Derek Lopez Arrested After Threatening Charlie Kirk Supporters and Making Violent Social Media Posts

25:54

Jesse Weber and Bobby Chacon Examine the Secret Service Failures in the Donald Trump Assassination Attempt

Jesse Weber sits down with retired FBI agent and attorney Bobby Chacon to dissect the troubling security failures that enabled Thomas Matthew Crooks to attempt the assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally. The shooting left Trump injured, two people critically wounded, and firefighter Corey Comperatore dead while shielding his family. Despite extensive FBI investigation into Crooks' background, devices, and associations, investigators have hit a mysterious roadblock: no clear motive, no political ideology, and no explanation for how a 20-year-old loner knew how to build explosives or exploit a catastrophic Secret Service security gap. Weber and Chacon break down the timeline, the unexplained access to an unsecured rooftop with direct line of sight to Trump, and the critical communication failures that allowed shots to be fired despite multiple warnings.

July 16, 2024

The Horrifying Attempt on Donald Trump's Life

The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania has left the nation with more questions than answers. The shooting occurred just six minutes into Trump's speech, leaving him with an injured ear, two attendees critically wounded—57-year-old David Dutch and 74-year-old James Copenhaver, both now in stable condition—and tragically claiming the life of 50-year-old firefighter Corey Comperatore, who died shielding his family from gunfire.

Authorities identified the shooter as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, a Pennsylvania resident who was positioned on a rooftop approximately 130 to 150 yards from where Trump was speaking. Crooks used an AR-style 5.56 rifle that had been legally purchased by his father. The FBI is leading the investigation into the shooting, while parallel investigations examine the catastrophic security failures that allowed this attack to happen.

A Shooter Without a Clear Motive

According to retired FBI agent and attorney Bobby Chacon, one of the most perplexing aspects of this case is the absence of any identifiable motive. While political assassinations typically carry an implied motivation—stopping a political figure from achieving their goals—investigators have found virtually nothing in Crooks' background to explain why he would attempt to kill Donald Trump.

CNN reported that investigators have examined Crooks' phone, computer searches, and home, and interviewed friends and family members, yet they cannot piece together a definitive motive. There is reportedly nothing out of the ordinary—just interests in coding and gaming. No political ideology, no religious motivation, no manifesto, and no clue that would lead anyone to suspect he was about to commit this act of violence.

"It is very unusual because along with the implied motivation of a political assassination or attempted assassination, you do normally find a lot of political ideology in the person's lifestyle and his background and his conversations with people and his associations with people and organizations," Chacon explained. "So normally they are ideologues and they are hellbent on carrying out an act of political violence. It's normally very apparent from looking at their background. And here they're not finding that."

The Disturbing Pre-Attack Timeline

Despite the lack of clear motivation, Crooks demonstrated significant determination and planning in the lead-up to the attack. CNN reported that Crooks visited a shooting range the day before the rally, where he was a member. He then went to a Home Depot and purchased a ladder, followed by a trip to a local gun store in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, where he bought 50 rounds of ammunition.

Crooks then drove to the rally in Butler, parked his car, used the ladder to access the roof of the adjacent American Glass Research Building, set up his position, and opened fire. Law enforcement later discovered rudimentary explosives in his car parked near the rally, including an apparent IED, as well as bomb-making materials in his home. Crooks also had a remote control detonator on his body.

"The young man was very determined," Chacon noted. "Clearly he's determined to carry out this attack with all of these steps he's taking, this what we call pre-event planning and pre-event activity, which begs the question on why we're not seeing more rhetoric, more associations in his background that would have led somebody to believe that he was going to do this."

The Explosive Device Mystery

At the time of the discussion, there was no evidence explaining how Crooks knew how to make explosive devices. This is not simple knowledge, and if investigators haven't found searches online about how to construct these devices, it raises serious questions.

"That's the first thing I would think of—look at a search history. Is he searching Google for how to make an IED or something like that?" Chacon said. "Our forensic examiners, our computer forensic examiners are good at that. So if he was using some kind of dark web to hide his search histories and stuff, our guys usually find that stuff. I don't know how a 20-year-old man, young man, without prior military training or any kind of training would know to get those things and how to even crudely assemble them."

Secret Service Security Failures

Beyond understanding who Thomas Crooks was and why he acted, there is intense scrutiny on how the Secret Service allowed this attack to happen. The American Glass Research Building where Crooks fired from had a direct line of sight to where Trump was speaking, yet it was not secured.

"Anybody that does threat assessments would have seen that as a vulnerability—that high ground with direct line of sight, not that far a distance," Chacon explained. "You don't have to be an expert marksman to hit somebody with a rifle from that distance. And so it's really the million-dollar question: how first of all the perimeter wasn't set out further, why that building wasn't part of the inner perimeter."

Even more troubling, Secret Service Director reportedly stated in an interview that they had people inside the building securing it, to which Chacon responded: "You don't secure a building from the inside. Not a short building like that. The benefit of that building to any adversary is the high ground, is the roof, and so you had to have people up there."

Who Was Responsible for Securing the Building?

There has been confusion and finger-pointing regarding who was responsible for securing the American Glass Research Building. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said it was the Butler Township Police Department and Butler County Sheriff's Office's job to secure that building. However, Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger told NBC News that the Secret Service ran the show and designed who did what in the command hierarchy.

Chacon clarified: "Secret Service is in charge of the entire security apparatus, and they coordinate stuff. So in other words, if they wanted somebody on that roof and they didn't have the manpower, they would have assigned, okay, Butler County or whoever, state police, whoever, you've got to be on that roof and they would be part of the plan. Secret Service should be going down their checklist and going, 'Okay, that roof needs to be secured. It's part of the plan. I don't see anybody up there.'"

Warnings Ignored

Perhaps most disturbing of all, Crooks was apparently spotted before the shooting. There were reports that he was acting strangely near security. Other accounts indicated people saw him with a rifle beforehand and saw him scaling the building. Witnesses alerted law enforcement, and it was reported that Secret Service was alerted to watch him.

Butler County Sheriff Michael Sloup told CBS News that police were looking for Crooks and confirmed that an officer scaled the roof. The officer had both hands on the roof trying to get up when the shooter turned toward him with the rifle, and the officer wisely let go.

"People think officers are supermen, like you hold on the roof with one hand while you're hanging on for dear life and you pull a gun out. It doesn't work that way," Chacon said. "What should have happened is, normally the minute somebody sees somebody inside, not even close to the perimeter with a gun, the call goes out, 'gun, gun, gun,' and then the protectee gets taken out. Soon as somebody saw somebody with a gun that wasn't accounted for, all the radios should have went off: get the protectee safe and then address whatever that was. That wasn't done here."

The Father's Firearms and Legal Responsibility

The AR-style rifle used in the attack was reportedly purchased by Crooks' father, who had more than 20 firearms registered to him and kept at the family's home. Questions remain about how Thomas Crooks got access to the weapon and whether his father could be held legally responsible, similar to the Crumbley case in Michigan.

Chacon noted that while the number of firearms is significant, the real issue is securing them. "The problem is not that people have the guns, it's that they don't know how to secure them or they're not willing to secure them," he said. "The father apparently may have had this weapon for a number of years. The kid had access to it. There's a lot of hunting in that area. The kid belongs to a gun range. Maybe the father lent him guns to go to the range and he's done that for a number of years. Maybe there wasn't any indication on the part of the father that this 20-year-old man should not be able to borrow his father's weapon and go to the range."

Two Separate Investigations

As Chacon emphasized, there are two distinct investigations happening. The FBI is leading the investigation into the shooter—his actions, motivations, and how he carried out the attack up until he pulled the trigger. The Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security are conducting their own internal investigation into the security failures.

"The FBI has a lead on all investigations involving assassinations or attempted assassinations of presidents or any other federal official," Chacon explained. "Those are two separate investigations. Secret Service has left to do their own internal audit about how this happened. The FBI is just looking at the shooter, his motivations, and how he was able to carry it out."

Congress has also launched investigations into the security failures, demanding answers about how a 20-year-old with a rifle was able to get within 150 yards of a former president and presidential candidate, set up on an unsecured rooftop, and fire multiple shots before being neutralized by Secret Service counter-snipers.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!