Up Next
Former FBI Agent Analyzes Tyler Robinson Case and Charlie Kirk Security Failures
7:17
Lee Smith Exposes Russia Gate as a Nonviolent Coup Attempt Against Donald Trump's Presidency
5:53
Former Illinois State University Teaching Assistant Derek Lopez Arrested After Threatening Charlie Kirk Supporters and Making Violent Social Media Posts
25:54
Jesse Weber and Bobby Chacon Examine the Secret Service Failures in the Donald Trump Assassination Attempt
Jesse Weber sits down with retired FBI agent and attorney Bobby Chacon to dissect the troubling security failures that enabled Thomas Matthew Crooks to attempt the assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania rally. The shooting left Trump injured, two people critically wounded, and firefighter Corey Comperatore dead while shielding his family. Despite extensive FBI investigation into Crooks' background, devices, and associations, investigators have hit a mysterious roadblock: no clear motive, no political ideology, and no explanation for how a 20-year-old loner knew how to build explosives or exploit a catastrophic Secret Service security gap. Weber and Chacon break down the timeline, the unexplained access to an unsecured rooftop with direct line of sight to Trump, and the critical communication failures that allowed shots to be fired despite multiple warnings.
The Horrifying Attempt on Donald Trump's Life
The attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania has left the nation with more questions than answers. The shooting occurred just six minutes into Trump's speech, leaving him with an injured ear, two attendees critically wounded—57-year-old David Dutch and 74-year-old James Copenhaver, both now in stable condition—and tragically claiming the life of 50-year-old firefighter Corey Comperatore, who died shielding his family from gunfire.
Authorities identified the shooter as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, a Pennsylvania resident who was positioned on a rooftop approximately 130 to 150 yards from where Trump was speaking. Crooks used an AR-style 5.56 rifle that had been legally purchased by his father. The FBI is leading the investigation into the shooting, while parallel investigations examine the catastrophic security failures that allowed this attack to happen.
A Shooter Without a Clear Motive
According to retired FBI agent and attorney Bobby Chacon, one of the most perplexing aspects of this case is the absence of any identifiable motive. While political assassinations typically carry an implied motivation—stopping a political figure from achieving their goals—investigators have found virtually nothing in Crooks' background to explain why he would attempt to kill Donald Trump.
CNN reported that investigators have examined Crooks' phone, computer searches, and home, and interviewed friends and family members, yet they cannot piece together a definitive motive. There is reportedly nothing out of the ordinary—just interests in coding and gaming. No political ideology, no religious motivation, no manifesto, and no clue that would lead anyone to suspect he was about to commit this act of violence.
"It is very unusual because along with the implied motivation of a political assassination or attempted assassination, you do normally find a lot of political ideology in the person's lifestyle and his background and his conversations with people and his associations with people and organizations," Chacon explained. "So normally they are ideologues and they are hellbent on carrying out an act of political violence. It's normally very apparent from looking at their background. And here they're not finding that."
The Disturbing Pre-Attack Timeline
Despite the lack of clear motivation, Crooks demonstrated significant determination and planning in the lead-up to the attack. CNN reported that Crooks visited a shooting range the day before the rally, where he was a member. He then went to a Home Depot and purchased a ladder, followed by a trip to a local gun store in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, where he bought 50 rounds of ammunition.
Crooks then drove to the rally in Butler, parked his car, used the ladder to access the roof of the adjacent American Glass Research Building, set up his position, and opened fire. Law enforcement later discovered rudimentary explosives in his car parked near the rally, including an apparent IED, as well as bomb-making materials in his home. Crooks also had a remote control detonator on his body.
"The young man was very determined," Chacon noted. "Clearly he's determined to carry out this attack with all of these steps he's taking, this what we call pre-event planning and pre-event activity, which begs the question on why we're not seeing more rhetoric, more associations in his background that would have led somebody to believe that he was going to do this."
The Explosive Device Mystery
At the time of the discussion, there was no evidence explaining how Crooks knew how to make explosive devices. This is not simple knowledge, and if investigators haven't found searches online about how to construct these devices, it raises serious questions.
"That's the first thing I would think of—look at a search history. Is he searching Google for how to make an IED or something like that?" Chacon said. "Our forensic examiners, our computer forensic examiners are good at that. So if he was using some kind of dark web to hide his search histories and stuff, our guys usually find that stuff. I don't know how a 20-year-old man, young man, without prior military training or any kind of training would know to get those things and how to even crudely assemble them."
Secret Service Security Failures
Beyond understanding who Thomas Crooks was and why he acted, there is intense scrutiny on how the Secret Service allowed this attack to happen. The American Glass Research Building where Crooks fired from had a direct line of sight to where Trump was speaking, yet it was not secured.
"Anybody that does threat assessments would have seen that as a vulnerability—that high ground with direct line of sight, not that far a distance," Chacon explained. "You don't have to be an expert marksman to hit somebody with a rifle from that distance. And so it's really the million-dollar question: how first of all the perimeter wasn't set out further, why that building wasn't part of the inner perimeter."
Even more troubling, Secret Service Director reportedly stated in an interview that they had people inside the building securing it, to which Chacon responded: "You don't secure a building from the inside. Not a short building like that. The benefit of that building to any adversary is the high ground, is the roof, and so you had to have people up there."
Who Was Responsible for Securing the Building?
There has been confusion and finger-pointing regarding who was responsible for securing the American Glass Research Building. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi said it was the Butler Township Police Department and Butler County Sheriff's Office's job to secure that building. However, Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger told NBC News that the Secret Service ran the show and designed who did what in the command hierarchy.
Chacon clarified: "Secret Service is in charge of the entire security apparatus, and they coordinate stuff. So in other words, if they wanted somebody on that roof and they didn't have the manpower, they would have assigned, okay, Butler County or whoever, state police, whoever, you've got to be on that roof and they would be part of the plan. Secret Service should be going down their checklist and going, 'Okay, that roof needs to be secured. It's part of the plan. I don't see anybody up there.'"
Warnings Ignored
Perhaps most disturbing of all, Crooks was apparently spotted before the shooting. There were reports that he was acting strangely near security. Other accounts indicated people saw him with a rifle beforehand and saw him scaling the building. Witnesses alerted law enforcement, and it was reported that Secret Service was alerted to watch him.
Butler County Sheriff Michael Sloup told CBS News that police were looking for Crooks and confirmed that an officer scaled the roof. The officer had both hands on the roof trying to get up when the shooter turned toward him with the rifle, and the officer wisely let go.
"People think officers are supermen, like you hold on the roof with one hand while you're hanging on for dear life and you pull a gun out. It doesn't work that way," Chacon said. "What should have happened is, normally the minute somebody sees somebody inside, not even close to the perimeter with a gun, the call goes out, 'gun, gun, gun,' and then the protectee gets taken out. Soon as somebody saw somebody with a gun that wasn't accounted for, all the radios should have went off: get the protectee safe and then address whatever that was. That wasn't done here."
The Father's Firearms and Legal Responsibility
The AR-style rifle used in the attack was reportedly purchased by Crooks' father, who had more than 20 firearms registered to him and kept at the family's home. Questions remain about how Thomas Crooks got access to the weapon and whether his father could be held legally responsible, similar to the Crumbley case in Michigan.
Chacon noted that while the number of firearms is significant, the real issue is securing them. "The problem is not that people have the guns, it's that they don't know how to secure them or they're not willing to secure them," he said. "The father apparently may have had this weapon for a number of years. The kid had access to it. There's a lot of hunting in that area. The kid belongs to a gun range. Maybe the father lent him guns to go to the range and he's done that for a number of years. Maybe there wasn't any indication on the part of the father that this 20-year-old man should not be able to borrow his father's weapon and go to the range."
Two Separate Investigations
As Chacon emphasized, there are two distinct investigations happening. The FBI is leading the investigation into the shooter—his actions, motivations, and how he carried out the attack up until he pulled the trigger. The Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security are conducting their own internal investigation into the security failures.
"The FBI has a lead on all investigations involving assassinations or attempted assassinations of presidents or any other federal official," Chacon explained. "Those are two separate investigations. Secret Service has left to do their own internal audit about how this happened. The FBI is just looking at the shooter, his motivations, and how he was able to carry it out."
Congress has also launched investigations into the security failures, demanding answers about how a 20-year-old with a rifle was able to get within 150 yards of a former president and presidential candidate, set up on an unsecured rooftop, and fire multiple shots before being neutralized by Secret Service counter-snipers.
Video Transcript
Thomas Crooks.
We have more questions than answers
right now [music] surrounding the
horrifying shooting of former President
Donald Trump and others at a rally in
Pennsylvania. From the motivation
[music] of the identified shooter to how
this even happened. We're going to break
down these issues with retired FBI
[music] agent and attorney Bobby
Chicone. Welcome to Sidebar, presented
by Law and Crime. I'm Jesse Weber.
[music]
Take a look at the So that arrow is the
lowest amount of illegal immigration
ever in recorded history into our
country. [applause and cheering]
And then
and then the worst president in the
history of our country took over. And
look what happened to our country.
Probably 20 million people. [cheering]
And you know that's a little bit old.
That chart, that chart's a couple of
months old. And if you want to really
see something that said, take a look
what happened over
[cheering]
Are you ready?
Let me get my shoes.
[cheering]
[applause]
[cheering]
[cheering]
We still have a lot of unanswered
questions in the aftermath on the
attempted assassination of former
President Donald Trump from this past
Saturday and we want to talk about it.
This is a horrific shooting that left
the Republican nominee for president
with a damaged ear. Two people
critically injured, 57year-old David
Dutch, 74y old James Copenhaver.
Although now they are in stable
condition and sadly this also led to the
death of firefighter 50-year-old Cory
Comptor who was apparently shielding his
family from the gunfire when he was
killed. It's just heartbreaking to think
about what happened here. And
authorities they have identified the
shooter 20-year-old Thomas Matthew
Krooks a Pennsylvania resident as we
reported on our previous sidebar on the
shooting. Reporting indicates Krooks was
a loner, had been bullied in school. He
had tried but failed to make his
school's rifle team because apparently
he was a bad shot. The FBI currently
leading up this investigation looking
into this shooting. And at this point,
reporting indicates the shooter had used
an AR style weapon, a 5.56 rifle.
Reporting indicates that the firearm was
purchased legally by Crook's father,
although it's not clear how he was
actually able to gain access to the gun.
The shooter was positioned about 130 to
150 yards away on a nearby roof. This
seemingly on the outside perimeter of
that rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The
shooting took place about 6 minutes into
Trump's speech. And after the shooting,
law enforcement discovered rudimentary
explosives in Crook's car that was
parked near the rally. This included an
apparent IED. They also discovered bomb-
makingaking materials in his home as
well. And apparently Krooks also had a
remote control detonator on his body as
well. So, it makes you think about how
much more destructive and lethal this
event could have been. But we have so
many unanswered questions about what led
up to this shooting, how it happened.
And so, with that, I want to bring on
right now retired FBI agent and attorney
Bobby Chicone to talk more about it.
Bobby, thanks so much for coming on.
First, let me just say, tell our
audience why it's so important that the
FBI is taking the lead on this
investigation. Well, first of all, the
FBI has a leot on all investigations
involving assassinations or attempted
assassinations of presidents or any
other federal authority, federal
official. That's the FBI's jurisdiction.
That's what we do. Here, we're talking
about two kind of separate
investigations that people shouldn't
confuse. One is of the shooter, his
actions, how he got to do it. The other
is the internal Secret Service or
government more governmentwide
investigation into the security lapses.
Those are two separate investigations.
Secret Service has left to do their own
internal audit about how this happened.
The FBI is just looking at the shooter,
his motivations, and how he was able to
carry it out up until the point, you
know, he pulled that trigger. So, those
are two separate issues. They kind of do
overlap and merge a little bit, but the
FBI is always in charge of any
investigation uh of violence towards
government officials. Hey everybody,
we're going to get back to this historic
story in just a minute, but I want to
thank our incredible sponsor here on
Sidebar who helps make this show happen.
Morgan and Morgan, America's largest
injury law firm. Look, if you should
find yourself in that position where
you're hurt and you need legal
representation, Morgan and Morgan may be
who you want your corner because they
are specialists in this area. And you
know why they're so big? Because they
win a lot. Verdicts and settlements in
the multi-millions. They also make it so
easy for their clients because from
starting your claim to uploading
documents to talk to your legal team, it
can all be done from your smartphone.
This is a firm, by the way, where
there's also no upfront fee. You only
pay them if you win. So, if you're
injured, you can easily start a claim at
forthepeople.com/lc
sidebar.
And and before we get into the first
question that I'm going to ask is about
the motivation here or the apparent
motivation, the FBI has resources that
uh another agency doesn't.
Well, I think so. Well, I mean, we're
the largest government agency in terms
of of budget and uh well, the CIA has a
bigger budget, but I'm talking about
manpower, the number of agents and the
budget we have for investigations. Sure,
we're the largest federal agency um to
do that. Other, you know, DEA focused on
drugs, ATF on guns, but we cover
everything. So, the FBI does have that
broader jurisdiction and therefore uh
broader resources.
Let me ask you the most basic question
when we talk about unanswered questions.
Why? If if it's true that he is the
shooter, Mr. Krooks, why would he
purportedly do this? And how important
is determining motive here? Because I
think that's an important point, right?
How important is it to understand the
motivation surrounding it? And and um
what could the possible motivation be
here?
Well, I mean, Jesse, look, with any
political uh assassination or attempted
assassination that this is, um you know,
there's an implied motivation. He wanted
Donald Trump dead because he didn't want
Donald Trump to become the president
next president. I think that that's kind
of an implied thing. I mean, he might
have hated Donald Trump for other
reasons, but it's hard to see that he
took this action any for any other
reason other than he wanted to stop
Donald Trump from becoming the next
president. I mean, he might have been he
might have had an agre agrievance with
Trump for other past actions that Trump
Trump may have taken while he was
president the first time. Um, but this
is a political assassination and
normally those things have that implied
motive of you want to stop this person's
political ambitions.
Well, this is why it's strange because
CNN is reporting that investigators have
kind of hit a roadblock. They've been
looking at his phone. They've been
looking at his computer searches.
They've uh searched the home. They've
interviewed friends, family, and they
can't piece together a definitive
motive. There's reportedly nothing out
of the ordinary. They've they they find
an interest in coding and gaming. Um but
they can't seem to find any kind of
political ideiation, any religious
motivation. Nothing no clue that would
lead anybody to suspect he was about to
do this. Do you find that very unusual
to see that?
It is. is it is very because like I said
along with the implied motivation of a
political assassination or attempted
assassination um you do normally find a
lot of political ideology in the
person's lifestyle and his background
and his his conversations with people
and his associations with people and
organizations and so normally this they
are ideologues and they are hellbent on
carrying out an act of violence in pol a
political act of violence. It's normally
very apparent from looking at their
background. And here they're not finding
that. So, you know, there's that, like I
said, there's an implied motivation, but
it could be, you know, he was just out
for fame, but often times we also see
indications of that in his background.
You know, he wanted to become famous
because, you know, he because killing
Trump obviously would make him famous.
Um, or, you know, because we had like,
you know, different motivations. When
when Hinckley shot Reagan, it was
because of his fascination with Jodie
Foster. It would it thought he would
maybe be famous. the person that killed
John Lennon actually was a big John
Lennon fan. So there's sometimes these
people have these ideas in their head
that this act I'm going to carry out
this act and then I would be viewed as
this other person or in this way. So you
know that's more of a mental health
expert question like could he and what
is in his background might indicate
that. Um but yeah, you're right. I mean,
a political motivated attack normally
has some kind of he would be more active
politically either online or in person
and we're just not finding that right
now.
And it could be that he also potentially
had a grudge against other people at the
rally because if you take it obviously
the number of shots that were fired, the
people who were injured, someone who was
killed, and if the explosives in the
car, which he could potentially have
detonated and harmed a lot more people,
it's difficult to know who the exact
target was or why. But here's the thing.
If you were to watch him before this,
you'd say something was up with this
guy. Why? Because CNN is also reporting
that Krooks had visited a shooting range
the day before the rally. Apparently, he
was a member there. Then goes to a Home
Depot where he purchases a ladder. Then
goes to a local gun store in Bethl Park,
Pennsylvania, buys 50 rounds of
ammunition. Apparently drives to the
rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Parks the
car. uses the ladder to get to the roof
of the adjacent American Glass Research
Building, sets up and opens fire. So,
Bobby, when we talk about what his
motivation was, and we see law
enforcement trying to set up a timeline
here, what do you take away from that?
Well, the young man was very determined.
It it clearly he's determined to do to
carry out this attack with all of these
steps he's taking um this what we call
pre-event planning and pre-event
activity. Uh which which begs the
question on why you're not why we're not
seeing more um rhetoric, more
associations in his background that
would have led somebody to believe that
he was going to do this because he's a
pretty determined individual as as your
description rightly spells out. And so
someone that determined is so motivated,
it's hard not to think that, you know,
you wouldn't see some motivation of that
in in other parts of his life, either
online or talking to friends or
mentioning something to family members.
Um, if he was able to keep all of this
rage and and carrying a gun to a rooftop
and shooting into a crowd, uh, and
taking practice practicing the day
before, I mean, you are determined.
There's a lot of rage there. And and to
have that rage not manifest itself in in
prior behavior or prior acts or prior
discussions is really unusual.
At the time of this recording, Bobby, no
evidence about how he knew how to make
explosive devices. That's not an easy
thing. And and again, if they haven't
found searches online where he, you
know, talk about how to make these
devices, I find that weird, too.
Yeah, that's the first thing I would
think of. Look at a search history. is
he searching Google for how to make an
IED or something like that? Now, I mean,
our guys are digging into it. Our
forensic examiners, our computer
forensic examiners are good at that. So,
you know, if he was able to use, you
know, this was a young man. He knows
computers. Um, he's of the age that he
grew up with them. And so, um, you know,
if he was using some kind of, you know,
dark web to hide his his search
histories and stuff, our guys usually
find that stuff. And and so hopefully
something like that happens because I
don't know where I mean unless you
somehow got a hold of a bomb-making
manual and I don't know how you do that
either. Um obviously stuff's readily
available on the internet which leads a
trail. Um if you're not finding that
trail I don't know how a 20-year-old
man young man without prior military
training or any kind of training um
would know to get those things and how
to even crudely assemble them. Again, at
the time of this recording, we haven't
seen evidence of how he figured out how
to do that unless he searched it
somewhere else, not on his own devices.
But I want you mentioned there's two
parts of this, right? So, there's two
parts of it. There's um what do we know
about the shooter, the suspected
shooter, and what do we know about um
the shooting itself and why it happened?
That's the second part, and that's what
I want to talk about because there are a
lot of questions. Um and there are a lot
of questions that have been put on the
Secret Service. The spotlight has been
put on the Secret Service. There's an
investigation not just by the FBI,
Congress, Department of Homeland
Security. And the first question is, how
was this American glass research
building where crooks purportedly shot
from? Why was it not secured, Bobby? It
had a line of sight to where Trump would
be speaking. Isn't there an advanced
team to check this out?
Done that. And they were probably there
on the ground, I don't know, a week or
10 days in advance as the usual. Um and
they would have anybody, you know, that
does threat assessments would have seen
that as a uh vulnerability that high
ground um with direct line of sight, not
that far a distance. You don't have to
be an expert marksman to hit somebody
with a rifle from that distance. And so
it's really um the million-dollar
question is how first of all how the
perimeter wasn't set out further. Why
that building wasn't part of the inner
perimeter that anybody getting to that
building would have to go through
security checks through the magnetoism.
That's the first thing. Why wasn't that
included in the outer perimeter? It was
a very tight perimeter. And the second
is even if it's outside the perimeter
and and make no mistake, Secret Service
and I've worked with them on different
events. They come in and they take I
mean what they say goes. When you have a
former president or a current president,
they are, you know, they don't play well
with others. They pretty much set the
rules. And if they told local police
officers, look, that's outside the
perimeter, but we want your guys on top
of that because they, you know, they
lend resources, then the cops would have
had somebody on top of that. Now, what
we heard from the Secret Service
director, I think in an interview, was
that they had people inside the
building. They were securing. You don't
you don't secure a building from the
inside. Not a not a short building like
that. And this is not the Texas School
Book Depository. So, you can't secure it
from the inside. I mean, the the the
benefit of that building to any
adversary is the high ground, is the
roof, and and so you had to have people
up there. The fact that it was sloped
service or even said it was slope, so
there was a safety factor. No, it wasn't
slope that much. Number one. number two
friends of mine who are snipers. They're
trained to get themselves into very
uncomfortable situations and stay there
for long periods of time.
And by the way, the the the Secret
Service snipers were on a slope roof
that day. So that the question, but
here's the thing I don't understand.
Wouldn't the shooter have had to have
known beforehand where the best position
to set up was to kill Donald Trump and
had to assume that that building
wouldn't be secure. Otherwise, he'd be
going and there's no way I'd be able to
set up there. I'm sure it's going to be
blocked off. I'm sure there's going to
be people up there. It was almost as if
he knew that was where to set up.
Yeah, that's a question that I had and I
hope the obviously the investigation is
probably looking into that whether or
not he did even more pre-event
surveillance in was he there when they
were doing the survey. Was he there the
day or two before so he could see where
the perimeter was being set up and he
knew that building was outside the
security perimeter? So, yes. And the
fact that he got a he brought a ladder
um leads me to believe that he knew
somebody might not be up there and and
that's disturbing to me um because that
stuff should all that's why it should be
inside the security perimeter. That's
why that stuff should be remain kind of
secretive. Now also I've heard reports
that people saw him kind of acting
strange outside the magnetometer. So I
wonder if he actually had the thought of
you know maybe I could get in, maybe I
could sneak in. Let's see what kind of
security they think. Maybe I can get
into the perimeter. And when he realized
he couldn't, then went back and
retrieved the ladder and maybe this was
kind of a backup plan. I don't know.
Interesting. Um, I'll get to that in a
second. I want to go back to this
building in terms of who's securing it
because we're getting kind of this
everybody's pointing the finger at one
another because local was it local law
enforcement who was supposed to secure
it? Was it Secret Service? And I say
that because Secret Service spokesperson
Anthony Gugglei said that it was the
Butler Township Police Department and
the Butler County Sheriff's Office job
to secure that building. But the Butler
County DA, Richard Goldinger, told NBC
News, they had meetings in the week
prior. The Secret Service ran the show.
They were the ones who designed who did
what. In the command hierarchy, they
were top. They were number one. To me,
the whole thing is under the
jurisdiction of the Secret Service, and
they will delineate from there. So, who
was in charge of securing the building,
Bobby? Was it Secret Service or local
law enforcement?
Well, like like he said, and I agree
with him. Secret Service is in in charge
of the entire security apparatus, and
they they coordinate stuff. So in other
words, if they wanted somebody on that
roof and they didn't have the manpower,
they would have assigned, okay, Butler
County or whoever you or state police,
whoever, you've got to be on that roof
and they would be part of the plan. And
what normally you do is before the
protectee even arrives on scene, you go
down your checklist. Is this done? Is
that done? Hey, there's nobody on that
roof. This person's supposed to be on
the roof. Where are they? That's Secret
Service. They should be going down their
checklist and going, "Okay, that roof
needs to be secured. It's part of the
plan. I don't see anybody up there." You
have to go. It's like a pilot going
through a checklist pre-flight. You go
through your checklist and you go down
all the vulnerabilities. That roof needs
to be covered. There's nobody up there.
Where are they? The protectee is not
coming out until the the person's on
that roof. Now, who is supposed to be on
there? I I don't know. But Secret
Service certainly was in charge of
making sure whoever that was was up
there before the protectee comes out.
And and even if it's outside the
perimeter, shouldn't they keep a careful
eye on that building throughout? Right.
I mean, the idea of even if it's outside
the perimeter, you know, you don't have
to go through a magnetometer necessarily
to get in there. Shouldn't that be a
place where you station at least one
person or you have your snipers keep a a
central eye on it? I'm sure they're
looking past 130, 150 yards. But if
that's a building so close, h shouldn't
that have been remain a focus?
It should. There should been somebody up
there, whether it was state police,
Butler County, or Secret Service. Secret
Service was in charge of making sure
somebody was up there, no matter who was
supposed to be up there. and and I would
like to look at their operational plan
and see who they who they assigned to be
up there and then prior to the protectee
coming on stage why the checklist wasn't
looked at and said there's somebody
missing up on that roof we need to get
somebody on that roof we're not bringing
them out until that's done now I think
that when you look at the video of the
counter sniper who took the shot they're
looking in the direction of that
building and I'm pretty sure that's
because they're hearing radio traffic
saying somebody's on the roof because
there was some chaotic uh situation over
there you saw the video of people saying
woman saying he's on roof. He's got a
gun. I'm sure that was put over comms.
When you look at that roof, it sloped
away and I don't think the counter
counter sniper guys could actually see
the shooter yet. He was crawling up. He
was on his belly and he and and then
what happened was an officer confronted
him and then retreated. He sh he turned
around with his rifle towards the
officer. What that did was make the guy
move quicker. Then he popped up really
fast over that peak and started
shooting. That's when the guy own the
sniper first cuz you see them looking
there and they're probably saying, "I
see the roof. I don't see anybody. I see
the roof. I don't see anybody." That's
because he's behind that slight and then
he pops up and then he starts firing and
then they fire back.
Ju just to just to amplify that a little
bit and explain what we're talking about
because the next question is, you know,
Krooks was apparently spotted there.
There were reports that he was acting
strange near security. There were other
accounts that they people saw him with
the rifle beforehand. There were others
who said they saw him scaling the
building, that they alerted law
enforcement. In fact, it was being
reported that Secret Service was alerted
to watch him. And the Butler County
Sheriff, Michael Sloop, told CBS News
that police were looking for crooks. And
they confirmed that an officer scaled
the roof. Quote, "All I know is the
officer had both hands on the roof to
get up on the roof, never made it
because the shooter had turned towards
the officer, and rightfully smartly the
officer let go. I would have done the
same thing." Absolutely. I mean, people
think the officers are supermen, like
you hold on the roof with one hand while
you're hanging on for dear life and you
pull a gun out. It doesn't work that
way. So, Bobby, what's your take on that
accus on that new development that, you
know, people had apparently seen him?
Law enforcement had seen him. He po he
allegedly points the gun at a member of
law enforcement. Um, was this just
rapidly happening too quickly? And, you
know, there might have been an alert
that someone's there, but like you said,
they couldn't figure out where he was.
That's the part that I think people find
very strange.
It is very strange and that should all
be taken into account in the operational
planning of this thing. And I've been
involved in a lot. I was the special
events coordinator for the FBI in Los
Angeles. We coordinated security for the
FBI at the Oscars, the Golden Globes,
the Rose Bowl, things like that with
LAPD, with Secret Service sometimes. And
so what happens, what should have
happened [clears throat] is, and it, you
know, hopefully they're on the same
radio. We had this after 911, the
interoperability of radios between fire
and police and federal and and stuff.
And so normally the minute somebody sees
somebody inside, not even close to the
perimeter with a gun, the call goes out,
gun, gun, gun, and then the protectee
gets taken out. So if that would a call
would have made if that officer would
have been able to get somebody's on the
roof with a gun then you take you before
any shots are fired before you even see
the guy take the protecti out get them
to a safe place resolve what that is and
maybe you put him back up on stage maybe
you don't but but soon as somebody saw
somebody with a gun that wasn't
accounted for it wasn't the state police
wasn't local whatever you didn't know
who this person was with a gun all the
radio should have went off get the
protectee safe and then address whatever
that was that wasn't done here. I don't
know if it was undone because the timing
and like you said it happened very
quickly right after that. I don't know
what the but we need to, you know, um
see the radio transmission logs which
are all recorded. We need to match that
up with the video. So much video. And
you're going to be able to get almost a
second by second analysis of who knew
what when and why the word didn't go out
to get him off the stage the minute they
saw somebody with a gun.
Bobby, I have one more question for you.
We're actually going to dedicate, I
think, a separate uh sidebar to this.
Um, and it's about how crooks had the
weapon, right? So, this AR style rifle,
um, apparently, as I mentioned, was
purchased by his father, and it was, uh,
reportedly more than 20 firearms that
were registered to his fh father. They
were kept at the family's home. Um,
we're trying to understand how he got
access to it. And also, I guess the side
question is whether or not his father
could be legally responsible for what
happened. In a similar vein as we've
talked about with the Crumbly case, what
are your initial impressions on this?
And again, I think we're going to
explore this on another sidebar, but
what are your thoughts on it?
Yeah, I mean that's look, that's a lot
of guns. You know, the problem with me
is not that that people have the guns,
it's that they don't know how to secure
them or they're not willing to secure
them. I know gun safes are expensive and
things like that, but I have guns in my
house. They're always secured. You have
to keep your weapon secured. Now, the
father apparently I thought maybe have
had this weapon for a number of years.
The kid had access to it. There's a lot
of hunting in that area. The kid belongs
to a gun range. He might have been able
to legally buy his own guns. I don't
know. So maybe the father lent him guns
to go to the range and and he's done
that for a number of years. So the
father had no idea. You know, the kid
goes to the range all the time. Maybe
maybe that's part of his hobby. People
do sometimes have have that hobby and
and so maybe there wasn't and like you
we talked about earlier, maybe there
wasn't in any indication on the part of
the father. you know, the crumbly case,
you know, there are cases where the the
kid or the person, the child, the
parent, um, they know they have some
indication that the kid has problems and
he should have access to a gun. But
here, we're talking about, you know,
there may not have been any indication
that this 20-year-old man should not be
able to bother borrow his father's
weapon and go to the range.
All right, Bobby, thank you so much for
breaking it down for us. We really
appreciate it. That's all we have for
you here on Sidebar, everybody. Thank
you so much for joining us and as
always, please subscribe on Apple
Podcast, [music] Spotify, YouTube,
wherever you get your podcasts. I'm
Jesse Weber. Speak to you next time.
[music]
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.