TPUSA sending out Cease & Desists. Let's talk compelled speech doctrine and the Darvo tactic!

[00:00] Hello and welcome back for another

[00:02] episode of Patriotic Housewife. Well,

[00:04] I'm sure we've all watched by now the

[00:06] Wolves in Finance video that he released

[00:09] today talking about the cease and desist

[00:11] that he got from TPUSA,

[00:13] basically asking him to use different

[00:16] verbiage, you know, don't use the A

[00:18] word, use effort, you know, paraphrasing

[00:22] things that he said. And what we're

[00:24] seeing is what is coming further. So, I

[00:27] truly believe that he was the first of

[00:29] many creators that are probably going to

[00:31] be getting these. And so, rather than

[00:34] going into detail about what happened, I

[00:37] kind of want to talk about what we're

[00:39] seeing right now and the tactics that

[00:41] TPUSA is very clearly using. So before

[00:45] we jump into that, I want to first share

[00:49] a very small clip of Wolves and Finances

[00:52] video before we jump into

[00:55] what I wanted to discuss with you guys

[00:58] because it's very interesting. It has a

[01:00] lot to do with what's going on and I

[01:02] think it's very important. So bear with

[01:04] me. We're going to be working off a

[01:05] script today. I typically don't, but

[01:07] just to stay on track and on point,

[01:10] we're going to be doing that. So, let's

[01:11] just listen to a few minutes of this

[01:13] >> to cease and desist defamatory comments.

[01:16] This is the first step when someone sues

[01:18] you for defamation.

[01:20] I know there are a lot of people out

[01:22] there making videos about Turning Point,

[01:24] so you should pay attention to this.

[01:26] They have started sending out cease and

[01:28] desist letters, and for some reason,

[01:30] they've decided to start with me.

[01:33] Apparently, they cannot handle the

[01:35] criticism from my teeny tiny YouTube

[01:38] channel.

[01:40] This letter is showing the world the

[01:42] type of organization Turning Point has

[01:44] become under Erica Kirk. They want to

[01:46] send legal letters to small YouTube

[01:49] creators.

[01:51] So, we're going to go through this

[01:52] letter. And by the way, if any of you

[01:55] know a good lawyer in Arizona that

[01:57] handles defamation cases, have them send

[01:59] me an email through my website because

[02:01] I'm looking for a lawyer.

[02:09] All right. So, we're just going to mute

[02:10] that for the beginning and then we'll

[02:13] turn it back on and we're just going to

[02:14] listen to like two seconds of this

[02:16] before I break all this down. So, bear

[02:19] with me.

[02:20] >> Point states in the letter, "Turning

[02:22] point entities are not looking for

[02:23] litigation. Rather, their interest is in

[02:25] the truth and making sure the public

[02:27] record is accurate." So, they are

[02:29] claiming they do not want to sue me. But

[02:32] I view this letter as a threat to sue

[02:35] and I think any reasonable business

[02:36] person would do the same. A cease and

[02:39] desist letter is the first step towards

[02:41] a defamation lawsuit.

[02:44] I interpret this letter as turning point

[02:46] telling me to shut my mouth or they're

[02:49] going to sue me.

[02:51] >> What other way would you interpret that

[02:53] letter? I mean a cease and desist is

[02:56] asking you to stop what you are doing.

[02:58] If you stop what you are doing, there

[03:00] will be no further action.

[03:02] If you don't stop what you're doing,

[03:04] there will be legal action.

[03:06] >> I do not understand what Erica Kirk is

[03:08] doing. Out of the hundreds of people

[03:11] posting on social media about Turning

[03:12] Point, why are they targeting me? Why

[03:16] are they so worried about what I am

[03:18] saying that they're sending me legal

[03:20] letters? I am one of the smallest

[03:23] YouTube channels in my market segment.

[03:26] Who do they think I am? I'm a working

[03:28] accountant with a small YouTube channel.

[03:31] I have no money. I have no power. I have

[03:34] no influence.

[03:35] >> It's because the information he's

[03:37] sharing, obviously, in my opinion,

[03:40] allegedly,

[03:41] holds weight.

[03:43] >> I don't know how much money they think

[03:44] they're going to get from suing me. All

[03:47] I have is the truth, and I'm not going

[03:50] to stop speaking the truth because Erica

[03:53] Kirk doesn't like it.

[03:55] The one good thing about a lawsuit is

[03:58] that everything will be out in the open

[04:00] and Turning Point will quickly find out

[04:03] that I have nothing to hide. The letter

[04:06] came from a lawyer named Paul.

[04:08] >> So, basically, they were going over um

[04:11] you know, things that he said, asking

[04:14] him to use different verbiage. You guys

[04:16] have kind of heard that. In the letter,

[04:18] they order me to please confirm that you

[04:21] will publicly correct your false

[04:23] statements immediately.

[04:25] This is not what I was going to talk

[04:27] about this week, but Turning Point is

[04:29] demanding that I communicate their

[04:31] statements publicly. So, here we This is

[04:35] a paraphrase statement of what I said,

[04:38] and they are saying that the paraphrase

[04:40] statement is a lie.

[04:43] you have to tell me exactly what I said

[04:46] that was supposedly a lie. And they do

[04:48] this through the whole letter. So my

[04:51] request to this lawyer in future

[04:53] letters, because I'm assuming there's

[04:55] going to be more effort, never used the

[04:58] word audit. So this is breaking news.

[05:01] Turning Point's attorney has now

[05:03] confirmed that the Charlie Kirk memo is

[05:06] authentic. We now have legal

[05:08] confirmation this did happen. It seems

[05:12] like their problem with my video is that

[05:14] I called it a Doge audit when in the

[05:16] memo it is written as Doge effort.

[05:20] >> Okay. So, we just wanted to watch a

[05:22] couple minutes of that to really break

[05:24] down what's going on here. And then now

[05:26] we're going to dig into

[05:29] why we're talking about it, what tactics

[05:31] they're using, and how this is

[05:34] eventually going to trickle down if we

[05:37] all don't, you know, stand our ground

[05:39] now with what is being said. So

[05:42] basically watching this, the first thing

[05:45] I think of is so much for our first

[05:47] amendment right. Something Charlie

[05:48] fought so hard for, believed in. He

[05:51] believed in asking questions. It's the

[05:52] only thing that keeps you free. And

[05:53] under Erica Kirk, asking questions and

[05:56] free speech is completely wrong. She

[05:58] can't come down because she's busy

[06:00] building, aka destroying her husband's

[06:02] legacy minute by minute, hour by hour.

[06:05] It's absolutely so sad to watch,

[06:07] especially the fact that he died for

[06:11] what he believed in and then they're

[06:13] destroying it. So, it's like dying in

[06:15] vain essentially if we start censoring

[06:18] speech, which we are. We are seeing that

[06:20] all over different platforms. my channel

[06:22] is not being pushed out. I'm having

[06:24] people unsubscribed. I'm having people

[06:26] that are saying their alerts are turned

[06:27] off. They can say they're not doing it

[06:29] and this is like a glitch. It's not

[06:31] true. They're bogging people down. You

[06:33] have to ask why. We all know what what's

[06:36] really going on here. Um they're not

[06:38] saying you have to use these words, but

[06:40] in so many words they are. And it's a

[06:42] violation of our rights to tell us what

[06:44] words to use. This isn't just about

[06:46] intimidation. This is called compelled

[06:48] speech. Con compelled speech. Um there's

[06:52] a compelled speech doctrine rather that

[06:55] prohibits the government from forcing

[06:57] individuals to express certain messages

[06:59] or beliefs protecting the right to

[07:01] remain silent and control one's own

[07:04] expression under the first amendment. So

[07:07] just like you have the right to remain

[07:08] silent, you have the right to speech

[07:10] unless you are intending harm as in like

[07:14] physical or immediate harm. Okay. So for

[07:17] instance, there has been several uh

[07:19] times throughout history where someone

[07:21] has yelled fire in a movie theater,

[07:24] right? And it's caused a stampede and

[07:26] people have died in that stampede.

[07:30] So that is an example of insightful

[07:33] speech that causes damage or harm. So,

[07:36] what it kind of seems like is TPSA is

[07:39] using this loophole

[07:42] and trying to go this direction and make

[07:46] it apply so that they can combat, you

[07:49] know, all these bad things being said

[07:50] about them and then send out the cease

[07:52] and desist that we are starting to see

[07:54] come out starting with obviously wolves

[07:56] in finance. Like I said, I think there's

[07:57] going to be many more to come. Uh it'll

[08:00] be interesting to see who gets them as

[08:03] we go. Uh, but I'm sure eventually we're

[08:05] all going to get them. You have to ask

[08:07] yourself, why can we not talk about

[08:09] TPSA? Why can we not talk about

[08:11] anything? What is going on? Uh, this is

[08:14] why we keep hearing, you know, of

[08:15] creators getting strikes. Like I said,

[08:17] accounts are being bogged down in the

[08:19] algorithm. There's all kinds of issues.

[08:20] So, like before the cease and desist, we

[08:22] already kind of knew this was coming.

[08:24] There's been lots of accounts. I'm sure

[08:26] you guys, if you guys follow me, you

[08:28] follow some other bigger channels or

[08:29] other creators that are talking about

[08:31] the same thing and you're hearing the

[08:33] same stuff from them. So, let's just do

[08:35] like a quick overview of compelled

[08:37] speech and what the comp uh compelled

[08:39] speech doctrine is. So, the compelled

[08:42] speech doctrine is a legal principle

[08:44] rooted in the first amendment of the

[08:46] United States Constitution which

[08:47] protects freed

[08:49] uh speech. This doctrine asserts that

[08:52] the government cannot compel individuals

[08:54] or groups to express specific messages

[08:56] or end or sorry and endorse particular

[08:59] viewpoints against their will. It

[09:02] encompasses situations where individuals

[09:04] are required to speak, display symbols

[09:06] or affirm beliefs they do not hold.

[09:09] There are plenty of different Supreme

[09:12] Court cases. West Virginia State Board

[09:14] of Education versus Barnett uh 1943.

[09:19] There's Woolly versus uh Maynard in

[09:22] 1977.

[09:23] And then we have Minor uh Minerville

[09:26] School District versus uh Gabbitas

[09:28] Gobbitus in 1940. Uh one of the

[09:31] incidences, we'll just talk about the

[09:33] West Virginia State Board of Education

[09:35] versus Barnett in 1943. This landmark uh

[09:37] case established the foundation of

[09:39] compel the compelled speech speech

[09:41] doctrine. The Supreme Court ruled that

[09:44] public schools could not force students,

[09:46] particularly Jehovah Witnesses, to

[09:48] salute the flag or recite the pledge of

[09:50] allegiance. The court emphasized that

[09:52] forcing individuals to engage in such

[09:54] symbolic acts constituted an

[09:56] unconstitutional

[09:58] uh compulsion of speech. That's an

[10:01] example. We've seen that even in today

[10:03] where people, you know, want to kneel

[10:06] for the national anthem versus stand and

[10:08] put their hand over their heart. Those

[10:09] kinds of different things. Um, so you

[10:13] know, it's all kind of, you know, the

[10:15] same idea.

[10:18] The compelled speech doctrine

[10:20] underscores the importance of personal

[10:22] liberty, allowing individuals to control

[10:24] their own expression and beliefs.

[10:27] However, the Supreme Court has

[10:29] recognized exemptions uh or exceptions

[10:32] rather particularly in commercial speech

[10:34] where the government may impose certain

[10:36] disclosure requirements to prevent

[10:38] consumer deception. In these cases, the

[10:40] court applies a lower level of scrutiny.

[10:43] Uh Cornell University has an example of

[10:46] that. So basically the conclusion to

[10:48] this whole thing is the compelled speech

[10:50] doctrine is a vital aspect of the first

[10:53] amendment um juristprudence ensuring

[10:56] that individuals are not coerced into

[10:59] expressing beliefs or messages against

[11:02] their own will talking about things that

[11:03] they truly don't believe in. It protects

[11:05] the freedom of thoughts and conscience.

[11:08] uh reinforcing the principle that

[11:09] personal belief should not be dictated

[11:11] by our government and that is extremely

[11:13] important and understanding this

[11:15] doctrine is essential for navigating the

[11:19] complexities of free speech rights in a

[11:23] million different contexts. Okay. Now

[11:26] the tactic that seems to be being used

[11:29] here is called the Darvo tactic. It's

[11:32] typically a tactic that that is used in

[11:34] SCOPs.

[11:36] And what that is is Darvo stands for

[11:39] deny, attack, and reverse victim and

[11:41] offender. It is a manipulation strategy

[11:44] often used by um perpetuators of abuse

[11:47] to deflect responsibility and shift the

[11:49] focus away from their behavior.

[11:53] And the process typically involves those

[11:55] three things: denying, attacking, and

[11:57] reversing. So denying the abuse or

[12:00] wrongdoing occurred, attacking the

[12:02] victim's credibility or character,

[12:04] reversing the roles of victim and

[12:05] offender, making the abuse appear to be

[12:07] the victim. The tactic is commonly

[12:10] employed to discredit survivors and

[12:13] manipulate the narrative surrounding the

[12:15] abuse,

[12:16] which we we see happening right now. So

[12:20] they are using Darvo essentially is a

[12:24] leg in this SCOP and what they have to

[12:28] do to get by at this point is they have

[12:30] to gaslight you. They have to isolate

[12:32] you. They have to abusively litigate you

[12:35] which we are seeing with Wolves and

[12:36] Finance and we are seeing with Candace

[12:38] Owens, right? Candace has a court case

[12:42] non-related to Charlie Kirk, maybe

[12:44] related to Charlie Kirk, um that she is

[12:48] going through. And then after the legal,

[12:51] you know, abuse with their attacks, they

[12:53] start to physically attack you, which is

[12:55] the threat on your life, which we have

[12:58] seen in Candace Owens and we've seen

[13:00] with other people and, you know, in

[13:02] other situations. So, let's just use

[13:04] this example just if we were relating it

[13:07] to you and me regular day in day out

[13:10] situation. When someone breaks into your

[13:12] home and you shoot them, okay, and you

[13:16] hurt them and then this goes to court

[13:20] and they say, "Oh, well, I wasn't there

[13:22] to harm you. I was only there to rob

[13:24] you. I wasn't going to hurt you. I

[13:27] wasn't going to hurt your wife. Uh, I

[13:31] was just going to take your crap and

[13:32] leave. Um, that's exactly what this what

[13:36] we have going on here. Just in lamest

[13:38] terms of like trying to give an example

[13:40] of what this is. They victimize the

[13:43] attacker. And we see this all the time,

[13:46] as I said, with domestic disputes with

[13:48] abusers. You know, it they're constantly

[13:51] having to take the heat off them and

[13:52] make them the victim. and you know and

[13:56] then make the victim the abuser or the

[13:59] bad person. It's always a game of

[14:01] deflection. And we see this with TPUSA.

[14:04] We've seen this for weeks. We have

[14:06] watched Erica Kirk get caught in so many

[14:09] lies. We've heard her lie out of her own

[14:11] mouth. Uh we've seen footage with people

[14:14] saying one thing and then footage seeing

[14:16] it where they're saying another thing.

[14:18] This has been in front of your your

[14:20] eyes. you've heard these lies out of

[14:22] their mouth with your own eyes and ears

[14:24] and then it's like no what what what are

[14:26] you talking about you know and so here

[14:28] we have this uh filing with Tyler

[14:31] Robinson where it's like rushing a trial

[14:34] like speedy speedy speedy uh you know we

[14:37] have to speed it up because of the

[14:38] victim Charlie Kirk and I represent the

[14:40] victim well the person who has the right

[14:43] to a speedy trial and a fair trial is

[14:47] Tyler Robinson

[14:49] So, that's a little weird. Uh, I've

[14:52] never heard of anyone saying that the

[14:55] deceased victim has the right to a

[14:57] speedy trial. Maybe it's both.

[15:00] Whatever. Bottom line is is like, what

[15:02] is she doing? Is it because she can't

[15:04] lie fast enough? And like now you got a

[15:06] ton of people coming out uh saying,

[15:08] "Hey, turns out you were here. You were

[15:09] in a movie. You were doing all these

[15:10] things." So now it's like rush rush rush

[15:12] to get this kid, you know, out of our

[15:14] hair so that like we could just close

[15:15] the book and be done is what we're

[15:17] saying.

[15:18] But anyways, back to this Darvo thing.

[15:21] So, they're basically using Darvo with

[15:24] Darvo. And by the day, this becomes more

[15:26] and more clear that this is like a SCOP

[15:28] within a scop within a scop. So, it's

[15:30] like one large SCOP with a bunch of mini

[15:32] SCOPS in there. That's how I feel. And

[15:35] it's getting exhausting. It's getting

[15:37] exhausting. I'm sick of it. I'm sick of

[15:39] being gaslit. I'm sick of the threats.

[15:42] I'm sick of the uh we're going to corner

[15:45] you to think and feel the way we think

[15:47] you should think and feel because you're

[15:49] not smart enough to use your own

[15:51] thoughts. Like rely on us to tell you

[15:53] how to feel. Rely on us to tell you what

[15:55] the footage shows and not your eyes. Uh

[15:59] let us dictate everything to you because

[16:01] you just can't handle it. You're just

[16:03] not smart enough. You're a peasant. I'm

[16:06] royalty. That's what it's giving. All of

[16:08] this is giving those things.

[16:10] The point of this is at some point we

[16:13] all have to come together

[16:16] and not let these people back us into

[16:18] this corner to where we are in fear to

[16:22] where we stop talking and where we allow

[16:25] them to blatantly violate our rights

[16:30] because that's what's h that's what's

[16:31] starting to happen. And we absolutely

[16:33] need to stick together and stand strong

[16:35] because we all know that divided we

[16:37] fall, together we conquer. And so it's

[16:41] one of those things where it is

[16:43] nerve-wracking. It is scary to think

[16:46] about, hey, I don't want to be punished

[16:48] for speaking out. I don't want to uh,

[16:52] you know, be demonetized or I don't want

[16:54] these things to happen. But it if you

[16:56] don't if you don't put a boundary up

[16:58] now,

[17:00] they're going to continue to push and

[17:02] then we're going to have even bigger uh

[17:04] hurdle later, you know? So, I just think

[17:07] we all have to start to say, "Hey,

[17:10] enough is enough. This is too much. I'm

[17:12] not dealing with this. We're not taking

[17:14] this. We're not accepting this." I

[17:17] literally will start a GoFundMe and I

[17:21] will get my behind to Utah and stand in

[17:24] stand inside that courthouse will sit

[17:26] rather while they try Tyler Robinson if

[17:29] it means bringing the honest truth to

[17:31] what's actually going on inside of that

[17:33] courtroom because I am so fearful that

[17:37] we have a situation where this poor kid

[17:42] you know who maybe he was involved he

[17:44] placed you know the weapon he did

[17:46] something. He had some part in it. But

[17:47] to think that he actually uh shot

[17:50] Charlie Kirkas, I'm sorry. That's I'm

[17:52] not convinced of that at all whatsoever.

[17:54] And so at some point, we have to be

[17:57] willing to stand up, be inconvenienced,

[17:59] say enough is enough, and get loud

[18:02] enough together to combat all these

[18:05] things, all these things that are going

[18:06] on. because there's so much more with

[18:08] Charlie Kirk than just financial fraud,

[18:13] uh, misappropriating funds, uh, money

[18:15] laundering or whatever allegedly is

[18:17] going on. Allegedly, like I'm saying,

[18:20] all these things, these allegations that

[18:22] are going on. I really believe that

[18:25] there's so much more to this and it ties

[18:27] into a much larger picture and that's

[18:30] why we're seeing all these attacks. So

[18:32] anyway, as I say, all this is a legend.

[18:35] Um, you know, divided we fall, together

[18:38] we conquer. And I just wanted to put

[18:40] that out there. But compelled speech is

[18:43] an important thing. It goes hand inhand

[18:45] with our first amendment. It's a very

[18:47] important part of the First Amendment.

[18:49] We've seen this with the January 6th um,

[18:53] riots at the capital. So, um, you know,

[18:57] it's not the first time we're seeing

[18:58] this. And so there are uh you know this

[19:03] doctrine is within the first amendment

[19:05] to protect certain parts of free speech

[19:09] and it's important for people to

[19:10] understand and the Darvo tactic is

[19:13] something that is commonly used in SCOPS

[19:15] and we are clearly seeing that when you

[19:17] start to really break it down piece by

[19:19] piece it all makes sense. So anyway I

[19:22] just wanted to put this together for you

[19:24] guys just to make this make sense.

[19:26] Please support creators that you truly

[19:28] love and stand behind. Please like,

[19:30] subscribe, share, share, share, comment

[19:33] on the videos. Push them out because a

[19:36] lot of us are being bogged down. So, if

[19:37] you genuinely really like our content,

[19:40] please make sure you're subscribing and

[19:42] you're liking their content because for

[19:45] channels like me

[19:47] where I'm still a very small channel and

[19:50] you're speaking truth, there are

[19:52] repercussions to that. and this is just

[19:54] probably the start of it unless we all

[19:56] can come together and really, you know,

[19:59] uh, push put our foot down together, you

[20:01] know. So, anyways, I just wanted to say

[20:03] I hope everyone is well and safe. Um,

[20:05] happy Sunday. Go Bears. They play

[20:07] tonight. Praying that they win so we end

[20:09] up at the Super Bowl. Um, obviously we

[20:11] have next week still, but still.

[20:13] Anyways, pray, pray, pray. Don't be

[20:15] afraid to fight um for what you really

[20:17] believe in. Don't be afraid to stand in

[20:19] your truth. Um, you know, it is uh

[20:22] creators today, but eventually it

[20:24] becomes all people. Everything trickles

[20:25] down. I said it with the Karen Reed

[20:28] case. You know, if you didn't want to be

[20:29] involved in that, if you didn't see

[20:30] anything wrong with that, well, you need

[20:32] to be paying attention because it's her

[20:34] today, could be you tomorrow, it's Tyler

[20:36] Robinson today, it could be your child

[20:37] tomorrow. And so, we need to face this

[20:41] head on together. Um, anywh who, I hope

[20:44] you guys appreciated the video and the

[20:47] TED talk. Um, and I will see you guys on

[20:50] the next one. Be sure to, like I said,

[20:52] like, comment, share, subscribe to the

[20:55] channel, and you guys can look up some

[20:58] of these cases. I'll just throw this up

[21:00] here really quick. There's several

[21:01] instances where yelling fire in a movie

[21:03] theater caused people to get killed. Um,

[21:06] you know, you had 19 uh 1903, they had

[21:09] 1911. So, it's not the first time that

[21:11] stuff like that's happened, and that is

[21:14] why this exists anyway. So, be sure to,

[21:18] you know, you can even do some research

[21:19] and and continue to look into the Darvo

[21:22] tactic and compelled speech. There's no

[21:24] better time to know your rights than

[21:26] ahead of time before you get slapped

[21:29] with something. It's just always good to

[21:31] know. Um, again, I appreciate all of

[21:34] you. I hope you guys have the best rest

[21:36] of the weekend and I will see you all in

[21:38] the next one.