Why Candace Owens Keeps Using Chelsea Handler as an Example

Showing 5 Chelsea Handler videos from Charlie Kirk's video collection.

Candace Owens has repeatedly used Chelsea Handler as a case study in what she views as a particular strain of celebrity feminism, one she argues substitutes performative outrage for genuine engagement with the world. In one wide-ranging conversation, Owens described watching Handler's public shift from an irreverent, politically incorrect comedian she once enjoyed into someone she saw as reflexively hostile toward conservative women, citing Handler's criticism of figures like Ivanka Trump as an example of what she called disproportionate vitriol. Owens grouped Handler with other outspoken celebrities, including Kathy Griffin and Sarah Silverman, while drawing a distinction with Silverman, whom she described as capable of kindness despite similar political views. Owens has also credited Handler for specific charitable giving, including a donation to Puerto Rico relief, even while criticizing her broader public persona. In a separate conversation years later, Owens returned to Handler again as an example when discussing modern feminism, questioning whether a life built around independence from marriage and children actually produces the happiness it promises. The recurring thread across these discussions was Owens's argument that a certain type of wealthy, childless celebrity activist mistakes online provocation for actual influence, using Handler as the example she returned to most often when making that case.