British Commentators Lotus Eaters React to Charlie Kirk Assassination and the Disturbing Celebration of Political Violence
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
A Former Liberal Natalie Beisner Reflects on Political Violence, Free Speech, and Why America Changed Forever
16:48
Oxford Union President-Elect Contests Ousting After Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Assassination in WhatsApp Messages
19:12
Victor Davis Hanson Dismantles Left's False Narratives About Charlie Kirk Assassination on Utah Campus
7:26
British Commentators Lotus Eaters React to Charlie Kirk Assassination and the Disturbing Celebration of Political Violence
British political commentators Lotus Eaters examine the stark contrast between how the right and left respond to tragedy, analyzing reactions to Charlie Kirk's assassination from both American and British perspectives. From Oxford Union controversy to mainstream media dismissals, the discussion reveals a disturbing pattern of celebrated violence and the dehumanization of political opponents. The conversation explores the organized campaigns needed to hold accountable those celebrating this tragedy, while highlighting how moderate voices like Kirk's are systematically mischaracterized and targeted. Breaking news emerges during the discussion that authorities believe they have the shooter in custody.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk represents one of the most devastating moments in recent political history. Witnesses describe a horrific scene where Kirk's young daughter, frightened by the gunshot, ran to her father for comfort, only to find him presumably already dead. The entire incident was captured on video and widely shared, forcing countless people to witness the brutal reality of political violence in America.
Kirk deserved to grow old, surrounded by the family he clearly adored, in a country whose greatness he recognized and whose potential he championed. What made Kirk unique was not just his ability to see potential in his allies, but his determination to see potential in his opponents as well. Through debate and dialogue, he worked to change people and make them into better, more virtuous individuals. He engaged with people on platforms like the Whatever Podcast that many others would have dismissed as lost causes from the beginning.
The Right Versus Left Response to Tragedy
The contrast between how the right and left respond to the death of political figures is striking. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away, Donald Trump demonstrated remarkable grace despite her relentless opposition to him throughout his presidency. Upon learning of her death during an interview, Trump responded with genuine respect, stating that she was an amazing woman who led an amazing life, regardless of whether one agreed with her politically. This came from a man who Ginsburg had worked against during every impeachment attempt and effort to discredit him.
The response from the left following Kirk's assassination could not be more different. Rather than showing basic human decency, many celebrated the tragedy openly and viciously.
Celebration of Violence Across Platforms
BlueSky, the social media platform where many fled claiming Twitter had become too hateful, became a cesspool of celebration following Kirk's death. Users posted actual kill lists with Kirk's name crossed out and other mainstream center-right figures like Ben Shapiro listed as potential targets. A lead developer for the Ghost of Tsushima sequel mocked Kirk's death publicly and was subsequently fired, though she expressed no remorse, stating she would lose her dream job all over again for the same behavior.
These reactions reveal people who can watch footage of a man being murdered in front of his family, watch his terrified daughter run to her dead father, and feel nothing but glee and rabid joy. Such individuals are simply evil, and they need to face real consequences for inciting and encouraging political violence.
The Oxford Union Scandal
The controversy extended beyond America to Britain's most prestigious institutions. Ebube Obi-Rapu, the president-elect of the Oxford Union who had debated Kirk in person, posted celebratory messages following the assassination. In leaked WhatsApp messages, he wrote "Charlie Kirk got shot let's effing go" and "lol" in response to the news. This from someone who had looked Kirk in the eye, stood across from him at a debate table, and would have received Kirk's characteristic courtesy and handshake.
What makes this particularly egregious is that Obi-Rapu gained admission to Oxford with grades of ABB, far below the straight A's typically required for full degree programs at the university. During a speech, he openly called for violent retaliation against institutions he deemed too broken or oppressive, stating they must be "taken down by any means necessary." This is clear incitement to violence from someone elected to lead one of Britain's most historic debating societies.
The Oxford Union issued a statement condemning his words but announced no actual consequences, claiming the current administration has no association with his upcoming presidency. This inadequate response demonstrates the need for organized pressure campaigns.
British Media Dismissal
British media personalities questioned why UK outlets were providing extensive coverage of an American activist's death. Lewis Goodall of The News Agents claimed the idea that Kirk was murdered for mainstream views was "nonsense" and demanded statistics, ignoring that Kirk's faction currently holds the presidency and won the popular vote in a complete mandate. Adam Bolton complained about the media coverage, calling it "America's issue, not the UK." Sky News presenter Saunja questioned the scale of UK coverage.
This stance rings hollow when compared to 2020, when the death of George Floyd in Minnesota led to demands that every Western institution be overturned. British citizens were told they must participate in this movement despite being locked down at home, with police officers kneeling to demonstrators in scenes broadcast across the nation. The selective outrage is transparent.
Violence Advocacy in Britain
The celebration of political violence is not isolated to America. British TikTok users posted celebratory content about Kirk's death. When Jeremy Clarkson expressed genuine fear about being a newspaper columnist for the first time in his life, an apparent comedian responded by telling him to "stop being so objectionable" if he wanted to solve the problem—a clear admission that agreeing with the left is the only way to avoid becoming a target. Similar sentiment appeared from a liberal politician in the Netherlands, whose threatening demeanor communicated the same message.
Robert Buckland observed that seeing the British left's reaction to Kirk's death made clear that many would cheer if a conservative MP got knifed in the street. The response has been utterly disgusting and revealing of what these people truly think. The British commentary class, sequestered in echo chambers and never engaging with the right, cannot believe the views that got Trump elected because they have insulated themselves from reality.
Taking Action
Those who celebrate political violence need to face practical and financial consequences. Organized campaigns of mundane administrative pressure can be highly effective. If someone celebrating violence is employed, contact their employer. If they work for a development team, contact the publishers and threaten to remove pre-orders if the person is not dropped. Contact investors and pressure them to pull funding. Mass complaint campaigns can jam up company operations and force action.
For the Oxford Union situation, concerned citizens can file complaints through the Student Union website. If responses are inadequate, complaints can be escalated to regulators, as student unions in the UK are regulated as charities by the Charity Commission. Similar escalation processes exist for television and radio broadcasters through Ofcom. These official channels have historically been used more effectively by the left, but organized efforts from ordinary people can create real consequences and change.
The Manhunt Conclusion
During the discussion, breaking news emerged that authorities believe they have apprehended the shooter. Donald Trump stated on Fox and Friends that "with a high degree of certainty, we have him in custody." Trump praised the work of local police and the governor, noting that investigators started with almost nothing—footage that made the suspect look like an ant—and through tremendous effort over two and a half days, achieved this result.
Remembering Who Charlie Kirk Was
The characterization of Kirk by his detractors is entirely false. Commentator Ash Sarkar claimed Kirk "died by the code that he lived by," but Kirk's code was debate, not violence. He never called for political violence against any opponent, and he had many. His weapon was his debating skills—sharper, more precise, and more effective than anything his opponents could muster. His code was dialogue over violence, bridge-building over division.
Kirk was a moderate voice willing to have conversations and see potential in everyone, including his enemies. He dedicated tremendous effort to involving young people in the political process and helping to put the current administration in power. His views were not extreme—they were mainstream enough to win the presidency and popular vote. The inability of critics to distinguish between moderate conservatives and extremists reveals their ignorance and their simple formula: anyone not one of them deserves whatever happens to them.
The reaction to this tragedy from segments of both American and British society reveals a disturbing acceptance of political violence and dehumanization of opponents. Those who celebrate such evil must face consequences, and those who value civilized discourse must organize to ensure accountability. Kirk's family deserves justice, and his legacy as someone who chose debate over violence must be honored and protected.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.