2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Oxford Union President-Elect Contests Ousting After Celebrating Charlie Kirk's Assassination in WhatsApp Messages
The Oxford Union faces its worst crisis in generations after president-elect George Abaraonye celebrated Charlie Kirk's assassination in leaked WhatsApp messages, saying "Let's effing go." Despite losing a no-confidence vote by 70%, Abaraonye contests the results while claiming racism. Dr. James Orr and Daniel Ogaloma break down the scandal threatening to bankrupt this historic institution, why Abaraonye's claims don't hold water, and how Charlie Kirk's debate performance at Oxford, just before his death, exposed the lies and incompetence now threatening one of the world's premier free speech forums.
The Oxford Union, one of the world's most prestigious debating societies with a history stretching back to the mid-19th century, finds itself embroiled in unprecedented controversy. The crisis centers around president-elect George Abaraonye, who celebrated Charlie Kirk's assassination in leaked WhatsApp messages shortly after Kirk debated at the institution. When the messages surfaced showing Abaraonye writing "Let's effing go" upon learning of Kirk's death, the scandal threatened to destroy the Union's reputation and financial stability.
Dr. James Orr, a Cambridge professor and Oxford Union member since 1997, described this as potentially the worst moment in the Union's history since the infamous 1930s debate where members voted they would not fight for king and country. The institution now faces collapsing membership, multiple lawsuits, staff departures, trustee resignations, and hundreds of thousands of pounds in losses, with a facility requiring £4 million in renovations.
The Failed No-Confidence Vote
In what appeared to be an act of contrition, Abaraonye called a no-confidence vote on himself. However, the results were devastating—he lost by 70%, with 1,228 votes against him and only 501 in his favor. Rather than accept the overwhelming verdict, Abaraonye is now contesting the results, invoking "rule 47 subsection H subsection 5" and claiming irregularities with proxy votes.
Dr. Orr explained the situation: "Before anyone talks about this being an example of cancel culture, he called the vote. Nobody else. This was not about his right to speak freely. This was simply about whether or not the members of the Oxford Union had confidence in him as president-elect of the premier university free speech debating society in the world."
Despite the clear mandate from members, Abaraonye remains president-elect pending an investigation into alleged voting irregularities. Dr. Orr expressed confidence that even if irregularities are found, another vote would likely result in an even greater margin of defeat.
Questions About Admissions and Qualifications
Dr. Orr raised serious concerns about how Abaraonye gained admission to Oxford in the first place, stating he should never have been admitted to the university. "I've certainly never let a student in with grades that bad. I'm afraid it looks like he was a diversity admission and this is the kind of admissions process sadly in Oxford is pretty corrupt and I'm very glad that this case if nothing else has drawn attention to that."
Daniel Ogaloma, who debated alongside Charlie Kirk at Oxford, described his impressions of Abaraonye: "I've always thought he's a strange fellow. I don't know him personally, but I've seen him around the union once or twice and he's always got a do-rag on his head. He doesn't adhere to the dress code policy. He's always looking scruffy. And I've always asked myself, how is this gentleman the person that's going to lead this organization?"
Charlie Kirk's Commanding Performance
Just before his assassination, Charlie Kirk delivered a masterful debate performance at Oxford Union that went viral. Having prepared remarks but choosing instead to respond directly to his opponents' arguments, Kirk systematically dismantled falsehoods presented during the debate.
In one powerful moment, Kirk challenged the audience: "I'll give you 1,000 pounds right now if you could tell me the US citizen that was deported under Donald Trump. You said that twice. Name one." When someone responded incorrectly, Kirk corrected them: "Wrong. Not a US citizen. El Salvador citizen." He continued debunking claims about Charlottesville and criticisms of Pete Hegseth, noting that Hegseth was dismissed as merely a TV host while ignoring his military service.
According to those present, Kirk had listened to all the preceding arguments, taking notes and marking down each falsehood. Blake and others on Kirk's team reportedly told him to "calm down" because they worried about how forcefully he might respond to the misinformation being presented by Oxford students about American politics.
The DARVO Defense
When faced with the consequences of his actions, Abaraonye employed what commentators identified as the DARVO tactic—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. This manipulative approach involves denying wrongdoing, attacking critics, and positioning oneself as the victim rather than the perpetrator.
Abaraonye claimed racism as the motivation behind the no-confidence vote, attempting to position himself as a victim of the institution's history rather than someone being held accountable for celebrating violence and assassination.
Daniel Ogaloma rejected this framing entirely: "I think it's just it just shows his level of immaturity. Charlie Kirk just got effing shot, let's go in a public WhatsApp group already shows you the kind of human being that this person is. So when he's ousted and he's calling it racism, you could already tell the kind of angle he's going to go down. I think it's total nonsense. I know many students of color, many alumni of color who voted in the no confidence debate and are not fans of him because of what he said."
Accountability Is Not Cancel Culture
Dr. Orr acknowledged that some free speech absolutists, including Lord Toby Young of the Free Speech Union, argue that Abaraonye should not be penalized for saying something offensive but lawful. However, Orr distinguished between the right to speak freely and the fitness to lead a free speech institution.
"You do not have the right to be president of the Oxford Union if you think—as I think was obvious from his reaction, from what he said in those private texts—if you think that violence and assassination are justified," Orr explained. "He claimed that it did not represent his instinct, his values, but I think actually it's when we—it's in the heat of the moment that very often we reveal who we are and what we think."
Daniel Ogaloma emphasized this wasn't cancel culture but basic accountability: "Thousands of alumni and students have come out for the vote of no confidence and I don't think that's cancel culture. I think that's simply just accountability. That's democracy in action."
Consequences for the Institution
The scandal comes at the worst possible time for Oxford Union. Several speakers have already announced they will not attend, and there are efforts to contact American politicians scheduled to appear, including Mike Pence, urging them to reconsider. If the Union loses access to serious political figures and thought leaders, it risks becoming irrelevant.
The institution has produced countless prime ministers, cabinet ministers, and influential politicians. As Dr. Orr noted, "It's not just the Oxford Union in shame, but the nation too and the nation's primary sort of elite forming engine room."
The warning was clear: "If you guys are no longer going to be a serious place for free speech and debate, serious people will no longer attend."
The Broader Stakes for Free Speech
The Oxford Union crisis represents more than student politics gone wrong. It reflects the state of free speech in Western democracies and the importance of maintaining robust free speech ecosystems across the Atlantic alliance.
As one commentator noted: "If we allow this to stand, we understand in America that we probably wouldn't exist in our current form and we definitely wouldn't have if it wasn't for what we inherited from England and from the Commonwealth—the Christian society that we inherited here. We have to maintain this posture globally."
The concern is that if free speech institutions in allied nations fail, America could become increasingly isolated, making it easier to curtail speech rights across Western countries.
Remembering Charlie Kirk's Impact in Britain
Despite Abaraonye's disgraceful response, Dr. Orr emphasized that his attitude represents a tiny minority of British sentiment toward Charlie Kirk. Days after Kirk's assassination, thousands gathered opposite Downing Street on Whitehall with pictures of Charlie, candles, worship music, and prayer in a moving celebration of his life.
"Let's not let this incident make your viewers think that somehow this is anything other than a terrible anomaly in terms of how Charlie was celebrated, how he was respected, and how grieved so many of us are on this side of the Atlantic in the mother country at his shocking death," Dr. Orr said. "We honor him and we're so grateful to you for carrying on his legacy and we are cheering Turning Point USA on from afar."
The overwhelming response to Kirk's death—both in America and abroad—demonstrated the impact of his work and the love people had for him, far overshadowing the hateful voices that celebrated violence.
