Candace Owens Exposes Erika Kirk's Flight from Women's Leadership Summit and Demands Turning Point USA Answer FOIA Questions

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Claims Erika Kirk Was Promised Vice Presidency and Directs Behind-the-Scenes Campaign Against Critics

Candace Owens Claims Erika Kirk Was Promised Vice Presidency and Directs Behind-the-Scenes Campaign Against Critics

11:37

James Li Exposes Turning Point USA's Dark Transformation After Charlie Kirk's Death

James Li Exposes Turning Point USA's Dark Transformation After Charlie Kirk's Death

47:04

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination Theory Involving Rigged Rode Microphone and Explosive Device

Candace Owens Investigates Charlie Kirk Assassination Theory Involving Rigged Rode Microphone and Explosive Device

1:14:28

Candace Owens Exposes Erika Kirk's Flight from Women's Leadership Summit and Demands Turning Point USA Answer FOIA Questions

Candace Owens confronts the ongoing controversy surrounding Erika Kirk and Turning Point USA, revealing that Erika abandoned the Women's Leadership Summit after being heckled and has still not provided answers about the alleged doctored video of Charlie Kirk. Owens also examines the White House Correspondents Dinner email describing Erika as an "emotional asset," updates on FOIA requests to the Department of War, and discusses the Trump family's controversial Albanian island purchase. With no apologies and zero budget for influencer networks, Owens continues demanding transparency about what happened to Charlie Kirk.

June 10, 2026

Dana Loesch's Scripture Quoting and 23-Tweet Meltdown

Dana Loesch experienced what can only be described as a significant breakdown on X after Candace Owens reacted to her speech at the Women's Leadership Summit where she repeatedly invoked the word "widow" in reference to Erika Kirk. Despite claiming she didn't care about the mockery, Lash proceeded to author more than 23 tweets in response to people calling her out for what many perceived as a mockery of scripture itself.

The fundamental issue at stake is simple: just because someone can cite biblical proverbs or verses does not immediately confer sanctification upon them. This principle applies universally. There are many criminals and literal gang members who have tattoos that say "Fear God" or feature crucifixes with biblical proverbs. These do not work as imaginary shields removing them from accountability.

Notorious B.I.G., for example, had Psalm 27 tattooed on his body, yet was arrested seven times beginning in 1989 for offenses including carrying a loaded unregistered firearm, selling drugs, robbery, and assaulting autograph seekers. Similarly, Sean Combs (Diddy) has a prominent back tattoo depicting the Madonna and Jesus as an infant. Despite this religious imagery, he faces serious allegations including abuse, drugs, and other crimes. The mother of his children, Kim Porter, died under circumstances that have raised questions, particularly as she was allegedly preparing to publish a tell-all book about his secret life.

The point is clear: citing scripture or displaying religious imagery does not exempt anyone from accountability or scrutiny. Dana Loesch's performative use of biblical references about widows does not shield Erika Kirk from legitimate questions about her actions and decisions.

Erika Kirk Abandoned the Women's Leadership Summit

Following the Women's Leadership Summit where she was called a "pedophile protector" by an attendee, Erika Kirk did not complete the entirety of her speech. She shortened it and then ditched the Women's Leadership Summit event altogether, not staying to close out the event or thank the organizers for their hard work—something Charlie Kirk always did.

This information was subsequently confirmed by Dana Loesch on her own show, where she stated: "She was very, very obviously upset, but she held it together on stage. She wasn't there for the whole weekend. She was scheduled to be there for the whole weekend, but who would want to endure that?"

The contrast with Charlie Kirk's approach is stark. Charlie was heckled everywhere he went, every time he spoke. Antifa protesters were a constant presence outside his events. There was a notorious incident in Philadelphia where Antifa chased both Candace Owens and Charlie out of a restaurant, throwing an egg at Charlie. His response? He smiled, laughed, and waved at the camera. That was the happy warrior approach.

Charlie Kirk was challenged on every campus he visited. He was heckled and directly made to respond and answer for his life choices, and he was always prepared to do so. Erika Kirk, on the other hand, is simply not built for public life. This is why she chose not to face what she claimed would be an empty crowd with JD Vance, instead making up what has been characterized as a questionable Secret Service threat which required her to fly home while the Vice President was sent to lecture the audience in her absence.

The White House Correspondents Dinner Email and FOIA Updates

Candace Owens continues to pursue answers regarding the White House Correspondents Dinner incident through Freedom of Information Act requests. The controversy centers on an internal email that described Erika Kirk as an "emotional asset" approximately one hour after a shooting incident. Rather than focusing on safety, the Department of War was allegedly directing people to artificially boost her "I want to go home" video because it was an "emotional asset," with the goal of making that video the number one video by morning.

Multiple FOIA requests have been sent out. The NSA initially responded, informing that the request was redirected to the Department of War, which falls under Pete Hegseth's department. The implication is that the email was controlled by them. The Department of War then replied that the burden was too heavy regarding the request because it was not specific enough.

In response, a very specific follow-up was sent narrowing the scope to only email correspondences regarding Erika Kirk and the White House Correspondents Dinner shooting incident during a five-day window, and only requesting searches pertaining to relevant personnel in the Department of War, including Bradley Hansel, Richard Smalley, Gustav Anderly, and Michaela Marzuka.

The request emphasized: "We are only looking for any and all email correspondences regarding Erika Kirk and the White House correspondents dinner shooting incident and are only requesting you to conduct a search as it pertains to the relevant personnel in your department."

This matters deeply because it goes to the heart of whether Erika Kirk's public appearances and emotional moments are authentic or staged political theater designed to manipulate public sentiment.

Turning Point USA Still Won't Answer About the Doctored Video

One of the most significant outstanding questions involves a video presented by Turning Point USA showing Charlie Kirk seemingly appointing Erika to run the organization in his absence. The question is simple: Was this video doctored? Yes or no?

Understanding legal loopholes from being sued frequently, Candace Owens intentionally addressed her email inquiry to Justin Streiff (COO), Andrew Kolvet (official spokesperson), and Turning Point's lawyer. If they lie about this, there could be real costly legal ramifications. Yet they declined to respond officially.

Instead, the TPUSA account—which is not identified with a specific individual and has been characterized as having "gone rogue" in the past—answered by not answering. They didn't confirm whether the video was doctored, which itself is telling.

Two follow-up emails were sent, both politely insisting upon a written response from an identifiable Turning Point USA executive. The emails reduced the inquiry to just two questions: Can you confirm that the video shared is entirely authentic and has not been doctored in any way? A simple yes or no will suffice. Is the video shared within its proper context, meaning Charlie was not speaking in jest?

No response has been received from Andrew Kolvet, who has the legal authority to respond as the official spokesperson, or from any other identifiable executive at Turning Point USA.

Notably, Blake Neff does not work for Turning Point USA. Graham Allen does not work for Turning Point USA. Yet these individuals have been deployed to defend the video while those who could officially clarify—Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, Justin Streiff—remain silent.

One stated barrier was protecting the donor who asked the question. However, that donor has now been identified as Julie Fields and Arthur Fields from North Carolina, who asked a reasonable question: "Charlie, you're one guy. What would happen if you weren't here?" That barrier has been removed. Turning Point USA is now free to share the entire video in its context.

Living in an Oligarchy: The Erika Kirk Coronation

The belief expressed is that Erika Kirk was promised she would become Vice President in 2028. This would explain why she has approached everything as though it was a coronation rather than something to be earned through merit, debate, and public trust. In a traditional aristocracy, you don't care about the voice of the people. You don't need to answer questions. You're just born into it.

The idea that someone can simply be installed into a position of power is the truest representation of the United States we live in today. Few powerful people control everything—this is oligarchy. And that oligarchy has guaranteed Erika Kirk power.

But what Erika has discovered is that while she enjoys the benefits from the power of the oligarchy, she never considered what it would feel like if she only had the oligarchy on her side without authentic public support. She wants both: the power of the few to pull the strings behind the scenes AND the genuine affection of the many.

The high she's chasing is the feeling she had at the memorial event when everyone genuinely loved her, embraced her, cried for her, and cheered for her. She wants to recreate that authentic moment of being truly desired. But that only works if the people are unaware of the puppet masters in the background.

A perfect example is Barack Obama, whose rise was not authentic but who was groomed from childhood for his eventual position. In 2008, most people were asleep to that plausibility, so they genuinely loved him and believed he would bring change. Obama was articulate and convincing—two things Erika Kirk lacks.

Erika is not who she is pretending to be. She is described as nasty behind the scenes, directing hits against people who question her authority. She personally made phone calls to priests, bishops, and attendees telling them not to attend the Catholics for Catholics event in March—a prayer event, not a political event. All the while she publicly pretends to be an innocent victim trying to carry on her husband's vision.

But Charlie Kirk believed in free markets, not power phone calls behind the scenes. Erika operates like Ben Shapiro, not Charlie Kirk. She directed Andrew Kolvet to lie about Charlie's attendance at Catholic Church, claiming he "just likes the architecture," when Andrew was live texting with Erika during that interview with Alex Clark to make sure he had permission to protect their evangelical Zionist base of donors.

The US Weekly Hit Piece

US Weekly sent an email that was four pages long, providing only 24 hours to respond, indicating they were already publishing it in print. The piece is essentially an advertisement—Erika Kirk placing an ad in US Weekly to attack Candace Owens and call her demonic.

The article quotes Erika's friends Tracy Martin and James Katis, who runs the faith department at Turning Point USA. It attempts to push the narrative that Charlie and Candace were not friends, and includes bizarre claims such as Charlie being "scared" to answer Candace's calls.

This is particularly absurd to anyone who knows Candace, as she is notorious for not making phone calls. She doesn't call anybody—not even Trump. She hates having the phone to her ear. Anyone who wants to reach her calls her husband or her assistant Savannah. Charlie and Candace almost exclusively texted.

The article is written by someone who doesn't actually appear to exist—a "sock puppet account" using a fake name like Paul Leva. This is a known practice in media where non-existent journalists publish hit pieces so that real people don't have to put their names behind them.

Ivanka Trump and the Albanian Island Discovery

Ivanka Trump appeared on David Senra's podcast to discuss her plans for Saison Island off the coast of Albania, the country's largest island known for its rugged coastline and abandoned tunnels. Her presentation featured notably bright lighting and a spiritual tone as she described her "discovery" of this land.

According to Ivanka, she and her husband Jared Kushner were on a friend's boat when they stopped for a swim. "That's effectively how we found it," she claimed. "We swam to the islands. We went on a hike barefoot all the way up to the top and we were just captivated."

The story is presented as though she is some modern-day explorer who stumbled upon uncharted territory, when in reality, they were on a yacht—specifically Nathan Rothschild's yacht—with GPS systems that would have shown them exactly which island they were approaching. People of this financial caliber don't browse Zillow for apartments; they look for islands and land to purchase, often land already owned by other countries and other people.

The project is massive in scale: a 1,400-hectare private island plus five miles of beachfront directly across from the island on a peninsula with a lagoon on one side and the ocean on the other. There are plans for 10,000 rooms with construction lasting 10 to 15 years—essentially creating an entire new city.

But the Albanian people are not pleased. For four days in a row, thousands of protesters took to the streets of the Albanian capital, brandishing national flags and flamingo-shaped cardboard cutouts on sticks. The bird has become a symbol of intensifying protests against this real estate project in a region known for its rich biodiversity.

Protesters argue: "The project that has been presented and the scale of the area involved makes it highly destructive. There'll be 10,000 rooms and construction will last 10 to 15 years. We're no longer talking about a place where nature will remain intact, but about the creation of an entire new city."

The installation of barbed wire on a beach sparked particular outrage among local residents. Albania's state anti-corruption agency announced it was opening an investigation into the project, though it has yet to disclose further details.

The timing is notable: this comes after Jared Kushner invested in plans related to Gaza before events unfolded there, and presented plans for what would happen once certain outcomes were achieved. The pattern of powerful families acquiring land while local populations protest raises questions about who truly benefits from these developments.

Tim Dillon on Trump and the MAGA Betrayal

Comedian Tim Dillon articulated how true MAGA supporters feel about Donald Trump and the sense of betrayal many are experiencing. He described the Trumps as "Tsarists" who were honest about being nothing like regular people.

"In the beginning when the Trumps emerged, the fact—and Donald—these people are nothing. They mean nothing. They're the runoff of dynasty. But like he was honest with people. It made them like him cuz he did not pretend to be in any way relatable. He was an egotistical maniac who told people nobody does it like me."

Dillon referenced Trump's plan to celebrate America's 250th anniversary with a concert, and when acts pulled out, Trump's response was to say let's just replace them with "the greatest act of all time, the guy who filled more seats than Elvis in his prime and did it without a guitar: Donald J. Trump."

"He's a Tsarist," Dillon continued. "But now that people are broke and he's selling the government off for parts and no one cares, it's not cute anymore. It's not fun anymore because everybody was like, 'We want him to be our Tsar.'"

Even Dillon admitted he was drawn to the narrative: "What a great movie. The rich scumbag becomes the rich scumbag of the people. What a movie. I just thought maybe there was a chance that the rich scumbag liar was going to do it for us. That really was the pitch. We're going to do it for you. I'm rich and you're going to get rich, too."

"And now what's happened is he's just has completely sold out the American people for Israel, for his family. They're going to be billionaires. They're going to buy islands. They're going to jump off of yachts owned by Nat Rothschild and find and discover islands and say that's mine and nobody cares what happens to the Albanians and nobody cares if the Americans are growing poorer."

Ariana Grande's Pattern of Breaking Up Marriages

Ariana Grande announced a split from Ethan Slater, a development that was predicted early on based on her established pattern of behavior. The core issue appears to be unresolved issues stemming from her father leaving when she was young, which she unconsciously recreates by pursuing men in committed relationships.

The sport for her is in breaking up marriages and relationships. Once she achieves that goal, the interest fades. The Ethan Slater situation was particularly egregious: he was married to his high school sweetheart, and they had just had their first baby. Ariana went to dinner with him and his family, held the infant, and then pursued the man. She pulled it off, and Ethan Slater left his wife and newborn child.

The pattern has repeated throughout her career. In 2011, she was dating Graham Phillips while he was dating Ally Trim, also a co-star in their musical. She cheated on Jai Brooks twice, once with Mac Miller. She was involved with Big Sean when he was engaged to Naya Rivera; Rivera later wrote in a book about walking into her house to find Big Sean sitting with Ariana Grande right before the wedding. Mac Miller was with his high school sweetheart of nearly 10 years until Ariana came along. There are also questions about the timeline with Pete Davidson, who was in a two-year relationship before suddenly getting with Ariana.

She was married to Dalton Gomez when she met Ethan Slater. The Slater situation represents perhaps the highest high—holding a newborn baby while taking the father represents a special kind of calculated behavior.

People have noticed that she looks physically sick. The physical illness follows the mental and emotional patterns that have been evident for years. The unresolved childhood trauma continues to manifest in destructive ways that harm others.

The Oligarchy Is No Longer Pretending

The overarching theme is that America is living in an oligarchy, and it has become dangerous because those in power are no longer even pretending to operate like a democratic republic anymore. Whether it's Turning Point USA doing a complete 180 on Charlie Kirk's vision, AIPAC effectively ousting Thomas Massie while Ed Gowin doesn't even bother running in Kentucky because he knows the oligarchy will make it happen, or Trump saying he doesn't care if Americans don't want to go to war with Iran—the message is clear: the will of the people no longer matters.

Charlie Kirk's death is viewed not as a random act by a leftist and his "trans furry boyfriend" as the official narrative suggests, but as something much deeper involving intelligence agencies and foreign interests. Everything examined has been Israel-focused. The lies from the beginning have been to protect Israel.

If Erika Kirk was indeed just a widow, she would have cared about sharing the truth immediately. She would have been concerned about proper investigation. She wouldn't have been directing attacks against Joe Kent for wanting to look into foreign connections. She wouldn't be laughing about Egyptian planes that departed at mysterious times on the day of the assassination. She would have behaved like a normal grieving person who couldn't pull herself out of bed, not someone ready to laugh at emojis six days after the assassination and count metrics on hats sold four days beyond that.

The truth matters deeply about what happened to Charlie Kirk. Those in power want the public to lose focus, to have attention deficit disorder, to bend the knee to evil. They are sending his wife out to try to make people do it with the Bible in hand. But no amount of Dana Loesches "shrieking like a demon on stage behind the Bible" will convince those who see through the performance.

There isn't enough money in the world to purchase perspective from people who recognize the truth. The oligarchy has power, but it doesn't have authentic support. And that gap is becoming more evident every day.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!