Up Next
Candace Owens Reveals Federal Agents Blocked Surgeon Access to Charlie Kirk's Body at Hospital
1:03:09
Candace Owens Uncovers Black Gloves, Hidden Officer, and Military Marksman at Charlie Kirk Shooting Scene
52:00
Candace Owens Exposes Overwhelming Evidence Manipulation in Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial
1:23:19
Candace Owens Highlights Shifting Eyewitness Accounts and a Contested Ruling in Tyler Robinson's Case
Candace Owens examines what she describes as a dramatic shift in eyewitness testimony from a student named Sara Tewell, who initially told Fox 13 that she watched Charlie Kirk get shot directly in the chest with blood gushing from his heart, only to give a second interview roughly 50 minutes later describing the wound as being in his neck, and a later interview to ABC News in which she additionally claimed to know the shooter's approximate distance. Owens argues these shifting accounts fit into her broader exploding microphone theory, tying them to a running list of details she says remain unexplained, including the condition of the crime scene, the handling of Kirk's necklace, and the lack of a standard gunshot residue test on suspect Tyler Robinson. She also reports on a Utah judge's ruling allowing prosecutors to introduce a recorded statement from Lance Twiggs at Robinson's preliminary hearing without permitting the defense to cross-examine him.
Sara Tewell's First Account
Candace Owens replays an interview given by a student identified as Sara Tewell shortly after the shooting, in which Tulley describes hearing a loud bang and watching the shot hit Charlie Kirk directly in the chest, with blood gushing from where his heart would be, before he slumped over. Tulley states she believed Kirk was dead on impact and describes the shot as coming from her right side.
A Changed Account 50 Minutes Later
Owens plays a second interview given by Tulley roughly 50 minutes later, in which her description shifts to describing Kirk as having been shot in the neck rather than the chest, while still describing blood spurting from his body as he fell.
A Third, More Detailed Account
Owens highlights a subsequent interview Tulley gave to ABC News, in which she further refines her account, now specifying that the shot struck the left side of Kirk's neck and estimating the shooter's distance at approximately 200 yards, a detail Owens argues closely matches the distance to the Losi Center building. Owens questions how Tulley's account became more specific and changed in its core details across three separate interviews.
Connecting the Accounts to the Exploding Mic Theory
Owens presents an updated list of details she argues are explained by her exploding microphone theory, including the absence of bomb-sniffing dogs at the scene, the paving over and excavation of the crime scene, the search for Kirk's necklace, shattered material found on the SUV, the absence of a standard gunshot residue test on Tyler Robinson, the removal of footage by an individual she names as Terrell Farnsworth, the absence of an ambulance on standby, Erika Kirk's quick public forgiveness of Robinson, a disputed account from a hospital staffer regarding cutting off Kirk's shirt, and the shifting eyewitness testimony just described.
Speculation About Lance Twiggs
Owens argues that if her broader theory holds, it suggests Tyler Robinson may have been set up by someone close to him with access to his belongings, namely his roommate, Lance Twiggs. She explicitly frames as her own speculation the idea that Twiggs could be a protected federal asset, citing his absence from FBI questioning as suspicious.
A Court Ruling on Hearsay Evidence
Owens reports that a Utah judge denied a defense request to compel Lance Twiggs to testify in person at Tyler Robinson's preliminary hearing, instead allowing prosecutors to present a recorded statement from Twiggs without cross-examination. She argues this allows the prosecution to introduce unverified evidence, including printouts of text messages and a handwritten note Robinson's defense has not been permitted to examine directly, and calls the proceeding a show trial. She notes the judge clarified the hearing's purpose is only to determine whether enough evidence exists to proceed to trial, not to determine guilt.
Comparing the Case to JFK
Owens closes by comparing the unfolding case to long-running controversies surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy, saying the preliminary hearing is scheduled for the week of July 6th and that she hopes to cover it live despite being on vacation at the time.
Video Transcript
Uh, I just saw it hit him in the chest
and then all of a sudden just tons of
blood gushing right out where his heart
is. And that is when Charlie C uh
Charlie Kirk was shot. It was in the
neck and I watched the blood just spurt
out all over his body as he slumped
over. That is remarkable.
That is remarkable. There is also the
curious case of the witness tree. We
covered this a little bit yesterday. The
people who were first to speak to the
media and set the narrative. They're the
most crucial people. Some people call
these people crisis actors talking about
what happened. So when people are
looking for information, they stumble
upon these people and they say, "Hey,
Charlie's been hit in the chest." And we
can describe to you how he was hit in
the chest. That definitely happened. We
showed you one student in particular, a
young woman named Sarah uh Tulle. But
yesterday, the internet quickly
discovered that after she gave her first
testimony with Fox 13, claiming in
detail along with others that he was
shot in the chest, suddenly 51 minutes
later, she went back onto camera with
local media and completely changed her
story. Here is her first interview to
jog your memory.
So, basically, um, I heard a loud bang,
which I figured a shot would be a little
bit louder, but, uh, I just saw it hit
him in the chest and then all of a
sudden just tons of blood gushing right
out where his heart is and then he like
fell over and slumped down and everybody
got down and was screaming and then we
all ran.
>> Can you describe just did did he appear
to be moving afterward or or what?
>> Not at all. Um, I personally believe he
was dead on impact. You heard the one
shot. Were there multiple shots or or
>> I think just just one shot straight into
Charlie Kirk and that was it. And I
think they got him.
>> And did you see the person who who fired
the shot or anything like that?
>> No, I just knew that it came to the
right of me and went just directly into
his heart.
>> I got a picture of him.
>> Did you what what did you see as far as
I mean were was the crowd How was the
crowd reacting to him? I mean he is
somewhat known for being provocative. Uh
but what was going on beforehand? What
was he talking about?
>> So the first student got up and they
were talking about religion, Mormonism
and Christianity. And the second student
to get up was talking about
transgenderism and how um gun violence
has been very frequent with that
community and that is when it happened.
Pretty ironic.
>> Yeah. Right. Like right after during
Right on that topic.
>> Yeah. It's when he got shot in the
heart.
There's four people that are in
attendance. One of them is her mother.
No one is disputing what she said. They
were in the fourth row and she says
directly hit his heart, came from her
right side. Uh, okay. That's pretty
descriptive. That's what she said at
1:17 p.m. But then just 50 minutes
later, she gives another interview and
her story has changed. This is given at
around 2:08 p.m. Take a listen.
Um, and then after that, they had
another student step up to talk about uh
transgenderism and the violence and gun
violence that's been surrounding that
recently. And that is when Charlie C uh
Charlie Kirk was shot. It was in the
neck and I watched the blood just spurt
out all over his body as he slumped over
and fell down. I believed that he was
dead on impact, but it sounds like he is
in critical condition. Um, so big
prayers going out to him, hoping that
everything is okay.
That is remarkable.
That is remarkable.
Directly to his heart to now on the left
side of his neck. But she wasn't done
cuz then she went big time. She spoke to
ABC News and this time her memory is
just getting better and better. She's
even able to confirm how many yards away
the bullet was fired from. and it
incredibly matches the distance to Los
Center. She becomes an expert in sound
ballistics. Take a listen.
>> So, I was in the fourth row in the
courtyard where Charlie Kirk was. Um, I
was a little to his left and uh the
shooter was to my right. So, and even if
you were looking at Charlie Kirks from
the front, the shooter was still to the
right and just got him right in the
neck. Blood gushing everywhere. Um, a
friend of mine and I ran into the
building and ran out the building. It's
like the exit pathway and just kept
running, crossing streets, like just
trying to get to safety.
>> And so you you think the shooter was to
the right of you based on what you heard
and what you saw?
>> Yes, correct. Yeah, it went right into
his left side and the shooter was from
my right and even in the middle it was
still to the right. And I'm pretty sure
you had somebody say this earlier, but I
think it was about 200 yards away.
>> It was about 200. How How did she know
that? How does she now suddenly know
that it was it hit him in the neck
versus what she graphically described as
it hitting him directly in the heart as
she points center? What changed? In
short,
none of that makes any sense. It's hard
to make sense of it outside of all of
these mysterious pieces falling together
when we examine the exploding mic
theory. Here's our update. It's good to
organize this stuff and to take a look
at it, our updated chart of everything
magically falling into place when we
consider this theory. um bomb dogs being
kept away from the scene. Why the crime
scene was immediately paved over and the
soil was e excavated. Why the feds were
searching for Charlie Kirk's necklace.
It explains why there appears to be
shattered black ABS glass all over the
SUV. Why there is no available footage
or any eyewitness reports of someone
seen firing a shot from the Lozi
building despite this being an active
campus in the middle of the day. why the
feds did not conduct a standard gunshot
residue test when Tyler Robinson was
brought in. It explains why Terrell
Farnsworth violated the crime scene to
remove the back footage. It's almost
like he got updated like, "Oh crap, it
hit his neck. We got to pull that
footage because we're going to need to
like explain that why it didn't go. We
got a 30 six." It explains why there was
unusually no ambulance on standby. The
paramedics would have likely seen that
shattered glass from the road mic pieces
and other evidence which would not have
support supported a gunshot to the neck.
It explains why Erica was quick to
forgive Tyler Robinson. It explains why
Brian Harpole cut off Charlie's shirt in
a scene described by him which
definitively did not happen. And if it
did happen, this hospital should be shut
down. If that scene did happen, this
hospital is insecure and it should be
shut down. That is not a safe place to
take anybody. If randos can run in and
start directing doctors and jump on top
of people and cut off their shirts
and decide to to perform security on
rooms, then this hospital, Temponogos,
uh should be shut down. That's my
perspective.
Lastly, it explains, as we just showed
you, why multiple front row witnesses
wrongly claimed that Charlie was shot in
the chest before changing their
testimony unusually.
Now, if we continue to follow and work
upon this hypothesis, then it inevitably
suggests what we've all suspected that
Tyler Robinson is indeed a pathy. And in
order to become a pathy, to be clear,
you have to have a really bad friend in
your life, right? someone that is close
to you and that is willing to set you up
to either gather or plant evidence
against you. someone with access to your
gun, access to your clothes, like I
don't know, a roommate who you're maybe
dating, and becomes the only source of
clear evidence, quote unquote, clear
evidence against Tyler Robinson in the
form of a dramatized text confession,
which doesn't pass the sniff test. A
handwritten note that was subsequently
destroyed, which doesn't pass the sniff
test, because why would you handr write
anything if you're going to just text
everything out anyway?
uh the person who curiously is not held
for questioning by the FBI. Isn't that
kind of mysterious? Yeah. I would
imagine if we take our theory to its
natural end, Lance Twigs might be a
federal asset, a very protected federal
asset.
And things are pointing in that
direction because yesterday news came in
rather a verdict came in. uh Judge
Graph,
which is difficult to explain given the
extraordinary role that Lance Twigs
played in shaping the narrative against
his alleged boyfriend. You might think
that the judge in Utah would honor the
defense's request to compel Lance to
show up to the preliminary hearing,
which is set for the week of July 6th.
Like, you're the basis of this entire
case against our client. If you assumed
that though that he would say yes, you
have to come because the defense wanted
to subpoena him, you would be wrong
because the judge has just denied that
request. Okay, so just to remind you,
the prosecutors in this probable cause
hearing
plan to represent Erica. She is the
listed victim on this case and they plan
to present at that time a recorded
statement from Lance Twigs at the
preliminary hearing. So essentially,
Lance Twigs is allowed to testify
against Tyler Robinson in the form of a
recorded statement. Robinson's team
therefore argued that they should be
allowed to have the opportunity to
cross-examine him. Otherwise, this is
hearsay. They're just allowed to say,
"Hey, I got a recording of a guy who
says you did it." Okay, but I say I
didn't do it. Well, it doesn't matter
because I have this recording.
Twigs now lives out of state, but the
judge has ruled that the purpose of this
hearing uh is not going to be decide to
decide upon Robinson's guilt, but rather
to determine if there's enough evidence
to move the case forward. So, they've
said it's allowed. I allow it. It's a
hearing that is allowed to move forward
built on hearsay this is what we mean
when we say that this case is going to
be a show trial. That's a show trial. If
you can just bring evidence into the
courtroom and that evidence does not
need to be vetted, then the judge is and
saying that's perfectly fine at this
stage. That's a show trial. Could you
just put yourself in that circumstance?
Okay. Lance says it happened and you
have no right to examine the evidence of
what he's pretending. Right? They have
not been given access to Tyler
Robinson's text messages to make sure
they're real or that they were indeed
sent from their client's phone that was
in Tyler Robinson's confession. Nope.
They said no. We're just bringing the
printouts. These are the messages. Trust
me, bro. They are not allowed to
question the person who says that he
found the note. They're just going to
play a recording of him saying that they
found it. Imagine that scenario in your
own life. You get hauled in, arrested
for murder, and someone says, "Yeah,
well, this person says that you did it."
And we have a recording of them saying
you did. And they're like, "That's
enough." Judge Graph says, "That's
enough. We don't have to produce
anything else for this preliminary
hearing. You got a rot in prison until
the real trial happens. That is why
people believe the fix is in. And I am
among the people in that perspective.
Like I said, the hearing is going to be
scheduled for the week of July 6th. I
will be away on vacation. But maybe I'll
have to set something up with you guys
to watch it live and respond to it
because this is so far beyond anything
that we could have imagined. We're just
living through JFK all over again.