Up Next
Candace Owens Exposes Turning Point USA's Psychological Manipulation After Charlie Kirk Assassination and Questions Official Narrative
1:04:08
Candace Owens Reveals Liberty University Scandal That Led to Charlie Kirk's Assassination and Jerry Falwell Jr.'s Fall
53:09
Candace Owens Releases Charlie Kirk Text Messages Proving Israel Stance Shift Before His Death
1:05:09
Related Books
Browse Conservative BooksCandace Owens Investigates Mysterious Men Who Removed Camera After Charlie Kirk Shooting and Finds No Blood
Candace Owens reveals her investigation into two mysterious men who moved Charlie Kirk's chair and removed the camera behind his head just minutes after the shooting. After speaking directly with one of the men, Terryl Farnsworth, and viewing the footage herself, Owens discovered something startling: there was no blood visible from the back angle, raising critical questions about the official narrative. As media outlets spread false claims about her relationship with Kirk and his organization, Owens exposes the coordinated effort to silence her investigation and the concerning push for hate speech laws in the aftermath of the assassination.
The Mystery of the Camera Removal
Minutes after Charlie Kirk was shot, security footage captured something unusual. Two men appeared at the scene, moved Kirk's chair, and took down the camera that had been positioned directly behind his head. The incident, now being called "cameragate" by internet investigators, raised immediate red flags about potential evidence tampering at what should have been a protected crime scene.
Candace Owens decided to investigate after numerous viewers noticed the suspicious activity. One of the men could be seen calmly talking on his phone near the rocks by the vehicle that transported Kirk away from the scene. Shortly after, that same individual, along with another man, moved Kirk's chair to use it as a step stool to reach and remove the camera mounted above where Kirk had been sitting.
Direct Contact With the Man Who Removed the Camera
Rather than speculate, Owens reached out directly to the individual, someone she recognized from her time working with Turning Point USA years earlier. The man responded immediately and agreed to speak with her. He explained that he had been sitting directly to the left of Kirk when the shooting occurred and instantly knew Kirk would not survive.
According to his account, after running to the back with others who evacuated the area, he caught his breath and began communicating with other Turning Point USA personnel about what had happened. This explained why he appeared on his phone near the scene. Regarding the camera removal, he told Owens he wanted to secure the footage to hand over to federal authorities.
Owens pressed him to share the footage with her instead, expressing distrust of federal agencies. After initial hesitation about consulting Turning Point lawyers, he eventually agreed to show her the footage via FaceTime rather than sending it directly.
What the Footage Revealed and What It Didn't
What Owens saw when she reviewed the camera footage surprised her. The angle from behind Kirk's head showed nothing graphic whatsoever. Most significantly, there was no blood visible from the back perspective. Owens asked the man to replay the footage multiple times to confirm what she was seeing.
This raised serious questions about the ballistics. Many viewers with military and hunting backgrounds had contacted Owens suggesting that the gruesome front wound appeared to be an exit wound rather than an entry wound, which would indicate the shot came from a different direction than officially stated. The complete absence of blood from the back angle seemed to support the theory that the bullet never exited Kirk's body.
Owens expressed confusion about earlier reports that federal investigators were searching for a bullet. If the bullet remained inside Kirk's body, as the footage seemed to indicate, authorities would have known this immediately and would not have been looking for a bullet elsewhere.
Media Attacks and Manufactured Narratives
As Owens continued her investigation, major publications began publishing demonstrably false stories about her. The Daily Mail ran a headline claiming Owens was "raging" after being "snubbed" from Kirk's memorial service speaking roster. The problem? Owens had never sought to speak at the event and had actually decided not to attend due to safety concerns and the strange persistence of journalists asking her to confirm her attendance.
The false narratives extended beyond attendance issues. Multiple media personalities claimed Owens had not spoken at Turning Point USA events in years and had experienced a "quiet breakup" with Kirk. This was easily disproven. Owens had spoken at two Turning Point conferences in the previous year and had toured extensively with Kirk and the organization on their "Live Free Tour."
One particularly notable speech Owens gave at a Turning Point event addressed America First principles and criticized the notion that any foreign country should take precedence over American interests. This speech reportedly caused tension with some donors who then threatened to withhold funding if Owens continued speaking at events.
Recent Communications With Charlie Kirk
To counter claims that she and Kirk had been estranged, Owens shared recent text message exchanges from May showing Kirk expressing concern about threats to free speech coming from Israel. In one exchange, Kirk sent Owens his tweet about the assassination of two individuals in Washington DC and the subsequent calls for hate speech laws. Owens responded that speech censorship was coming to America, to which Kirk replied on May 22nd: "It totally is."
These messages revealed Kirk was deeply worried about restrictions on free speech and the role certain foreign interests played in pushing for such restrictions. This made the aftermath of his assassination, in which government officials immediately called for hate speech legislation, particularly disturbing to Owens.
The Push for Hate Speech Laws
In the wake of Kirk's death, Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared on a podcast and made statements that alarmed free speech advocates. She declared there was a difference between free speech and hate speech, and specifically cited Kirk's assassination as justification for targeting people with what the government deemed "hate speech."
Owens found this development especially troubling given Kirk's documented concerns about exactly this type of government overreach. She argued that using Kirk's death to justify the very speech restrictions he opposed represented a betrayal of his legacy.
The situation drew parallels to past national traumas where government expanded its powers in the name of security. Owens warned that citizens must resist the impulse to surrender freedoms to the government during moments of emotional crisis.
The Jimmy Kimmel Controversy
The free speech debate intensified when late-night host Jimmy Kimmel faced consequences for comments he made about Kirk's assassination. While Kimmel had posted a sincere condolence message on social media calling the shooting senseless and sending love to the Kirk family, he also made jokes during his show about how President Trump was handling his grief.
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr threatened federal action against ABC affiliates carrying Kimmel's show and suggested Kimmel should make a "meaningful personal donation" to the Kirk family and Turning Point USA. The show was pulled off the air indefinitely.
Owens, despite disliking Kimmel and his politics, opposed the government-mandated consequences. She argued that this represented the same overreach from a different political direction, with the government deciding what speech was acceptable rather than allowing the free market and public opinion to render judgment. She emphasized that demanding donations as punishment for speech amounted to a shakedown similar to what happened to NBA player Kyrie Irving.
Social Media Platforms and Foreign Influence
Owens also addressed developments around TikTok, noting that despite rhetoric about protecting the platform, it appeared to be moving toward control by interests aligned with Israel. She suggested the entire campaign against TikTok began when the platform's users started expressing pro-Palestine sentiments, and that the eventual sale would hand control to hedge fund investors with strong Israel ties.
This fit into Owens' broader concern that foreign interests, particularly from Israel, were exercising disproportionate influence over American media, politics, and speech. She pointed to the backgrounds of journalists writing negative stories about her, many of whom had documented connections to pro-Israel lobbying organizations like AIPAC.
Turning Point USA Internal Changes
Perhaps most significantly, Owens revealed that multiple current Turning Point USA employees had contacted her with information about troubling changes at the organization in the months leading up to Kirk's death. According to these sources, major organizational shifts occurred around May, including unusual firings, departmental restructuring, and instructions to keep certain matters secret.
Owens stated she had been given names and was verifying the information with the help of other journalists. She believed Kirk had been betrayed by people close to him and that strange financial activity had been occurring at Turning Point USA. While she did not provide specific details, she indicated this would be the subject of a lengthier investigation.
The Caldera Engineering Connection
One investigative thread involved Caldera Engineering, a valve and piping manufacturing company based in Provo, Utah. Multiple employees of this company lived on the street where doorbell camera footage of the shooter's vehicle had been captured. TMZ had somehow obtained this footage, which Owens found suspicious.
After mentioning this detail, Owens received numerous emails from people with experience in industrial engineering and government contracting. These sources explained that valve and piping manufacturing was a highly specialized industry with extensive government and military contracts. Modern industrial valves connect to SCADA systems and operational technology networks that control critical infrastructure like pipelines, water treatment plants, and power facilities.
According to these experts, intelligence agencies including the CIA, NSA, and various regulatory bodies maintain close relationships with valve manufacturers because of the cybersecurity implications and potential vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure. The ability to monitor and control valves remotely makes them potential targets for cyberattacks or sabotage.
Owens found it suspicious that multiple people connected to her previous investigations had backgrounds in this niche industry, which appeared to have significant intelligence community connections. Caldera Engineering's website indicated they had completed projects in Israel, among other countries.
The Dairy Queen Photo Evidence
Some viewers had questioned whether a photo showing two individuals at Dairy Queen, believed to be connected to the case, might have been from months earlier rather than recent, noting a Superman movie poster visible in the background. That film's promotional period had ended in June or July.
However, Owens explained why the photo had to be recent. First, businesses do not maintain security footage for months due to storage limitations. Most systems automatically delete footage after 48 to 72 hours, with some extending to a week at most. It would have been impossible for someone to search through months of footage on the off chance they might find relevant images.
More definitively, the photo showed an advertisement for a maple cookie shake that Dairy Queen only began promoting on August 31st. This meant the photo could not possibly predate late August, confirming the source's information was accurate. Owens expressed confidence in this source, who had also provided specific details about clothing being discarded in a nearby cemetery.
Additional Leads and CIA Connections
Owens indicated she was examining several other leads that viewers had sent, including suspicious activity at a vacant house next door to a key location, which locals believed was the actual place the shooter had gone. She was also looking into alleged CIA recruitment programs at Utah Valley University, with sources suggesting a pipeline existed from UVU to CIA employment.
While she wanted to pursue these leads, Owens emphasized the importance of careful fact-checking to avoid targeting innocent people. She encouraged anyone with relevant photos, videos, or information to send tips to her team.
Internet Investigators and Humor
Throughout her investigation, Owens repeatedly praised the work of independent internet researchers who had noticed details professional journalists missed. These individuals identified the suspicious men in the footage, tracked down the Dairy Queen connection, and analyzed countless hours of video to develop timelines and identify inconsistencies.
She also celebrated the humor of content creators who mocked the obviously fabricated text messages between Tyler Robinson and his alleged lover Lance that federal authorities had released as evidence. The messages were written in such an archaic, formal style that they seemed to come from the 1920s rather than contemporary young people. One popular theory suggested the FBI had used AI to generate the messages but had prompted it incorrectly, asking for dialogue between people "in their 20s" which the AI interpreted as the 1920s decade rather than people aged 20-29.
Owens shared a video from creator Chris Olsen that perfectly parodied the stilted language: "Good day, my love. I have just committed one of the highest sins of the Lord. Murder. I must flee the country now in my vehicle." The mockery highlighted how drastically federal authorities had overplayed their hand.
A Memorial of Truth-Seeking
Owens concluded by stating that the best way to honor Kirk's memory was to continue seeking truth about his death, regardless of where that investigation led or who tried to stop it. She refused to be intimidated by media attacks or coordinated campaigns to discredit her work.
Rather than attending the official memorial service, which she viewed as potentially dangerous given the coordinated media pressure to confirm her attendance, Owens said she would spend the weekend listening to Kanye West and continuing her investigation. She encouraged supporters to recognize that the intensity of the attacks against her suggested the investigation was getting close to important revelations.
She warned viewers to be conscious of how emotional manipulation was being used across the political spectrum to consolidate government power. Whether the issue was George Floyd on the left or Charlie Kirk on the right, the pattern remained the same: tragic events were exploited to justify speech restrictions and expanded federal authority. Owens called on her audience to reject this pattern regardless of which political side was implementing it, emphasizing that the real division was not left versus right but elites versus everyone else.
Video Transcript
All right, you guys. I hope everyone has been
having a good Friday. Uh, what are we going to discuss today? Well, it has been going viral.
A mere minutes after Charlie Kirk is shot, there are two men that look rather mysterious,
they appear, they move his chair, and they take down the camera that's directly or was
directly behind his head. Why did they do that? Well, fortunately, I was able to establish
connection with one of those individuals, and I was also able to see the footage with my own eyes.
What I saw was very interesting, but what I didn't see was even more interesting. So, let's jump
right back into this. Welcome back to Candace. Okay, rare Friday episode. Got to do Friday
episode here because this is just so important and the vultures are circulating above. Man,
they are definitely insisting that we stop investigating this. I should at first let you
know that the Senate has voted and they have passed a bipartisan resolution to designate
October 14th, which is Charlie's birthday, as Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day. And I have to
say that is a very government maneuver. Like we get a Martin Luther King Day, we've got Martin
Luther King Boulevards, John F. Kennedy gets a library and a national day of morning. But
you know what? You know what I was thinking? I'd like to just find out who killed them all
first. That's interesting to me. Who killed them before we give them a library? I'd like to
know who did it. I think that's the best way uh for us to learn. The best way for us to remember
is to study, right? That's what I learned at grade school. That's what we're doing right now. We're
studying this and learning everything. Let's at first address what many people have been emailing
me constantly asking me, Ken, you got to look into this. You got to look into this. Look at these
two strange men. We're going to refer to this as cameragate. It is cameragate. And I want to say
this, shout out to all of the internet sleuths, the Tik Tockers, the YouTubers, those of you
who were not playing around and you noticed this because I did not in the beginning. Uh but
yes, as I said, there's an individual who is at first in the moment just after the shooting, he's
like up on the rocks near the car that uh Charlie gets taken away in while he's being carried away.
Let's take a look at that f that footage actually first. Let's look at that footage. And don't
worry, there's no gore in this episode. Um, difficult for me to even look at that sort of
footage. Take a look. You can see Charlie's there. And one of you guys caught this. You probably
didn't even see it there. And we can get in a little closer. Do you guys have it uh slow it
down or you guys just want to circle here? Okay. right there. Right there, an individual standing there. Again,
I am just amazed at internet slooh as I was like, "Wow, that is very strange. That person
appears to be calmly talking into their phone. It's like a circus around them. What's
he doing? Who's he who's he speaking to to?" Then just a couple of minutes afterward,
that same individual appears alongside another individual and he moves Charlie's
chair. That's a crime scene. That's not good. And he moves it because he wants to
stand on it as he takes down the cameras uh or the camera rather that is just above
Charlie's head. That's the camera that I'm talking about on the right hand side. That's a
camera that I'm referring to. And we are going to now take a look at him. Uh, and he is also the
individual, as many of you pointed out, that was uh, near Charlie or just before the assassination.
Uh, but let's check out that footage of him in the immediate aftermath kind of switching around
the cameras, the two of them. Take a look. Serious knock this up. Safety team is here. I just heard them
say active shooter. Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what
the what the security detail just said. Don't worry, guys. We're going to get closer.
Uh, this is a just a wide shot so you can see what's going on here. And then we'll get a
bit closer. I know you guys have uh pulled apart this footage a million ways. And thank you
for that. And here's the closer version of that. You can see slowed down here. He pulls
out the chair. He stands on it. And yes, that is would be a big no no for a crime scene.
You don't move anything. He takes down the camera that is directly above where Charlie was sitting
and would be able to provide therefore a lot of ins a lot of insight. And then you can see he kind
of sits the camera onto the desk and it looks like he removes the SIM card from it or the SD card
if you will. Um, which we're watching right here. So, I'm going I'm going when I saw this
footage. Who is that? Like, actually, I should be able to figure this out because I've
got a pretty big network at Turning Point USA. I'm the person's wearing shades. I'm not recognizing
the individual. And I reach out to somebody on the inside and I'm just like, who's this person?
and they tell me the person's name and I go, "Wait a second." And I look again, I'm like,
"I know this person cuz it's been a few years, but I I know this person. This person's been
around Turning Point for quite some time, for years, like I said, back when I was working
at Turning Point, early days. So, I'm like, I'm just going to reach out. Obviously, I know
this individual. I'm going to reach out and I'm going to say, "Hey, what's up with this? Where is
this footage? Why did you do this? What were you doing up there on the rocks? Um, what what's up?
Like this is not the first thing that I would do if I had just witnessed Charlie Kirk being shot.
And I'll say this right now, he was extremely forthcoming. Like as soon as I reached out, I
just sent a text because I still had his number and he was extremely forthcoming. Immediately
got onto the phone and first and foremost, I should say obviously he's seeing all these clips
going viral and he is fearful for his family. he is doesn't have any security and people are
looking you know and he said look I as you can see in the footage I was sitting right to the left
or or to the left of Charlie when Charlie got shot and I instantly knew that he was not going to
be okay instantly knew that he was dead and I then like as you can see people that are running
anybody that was in that zone uh ran to the back and he caught his breath. He wanted to check
in with and and communicate to other people um that were working with and around Turning Point
USA. That's why he's on his phone uh communicating to them what had happened. That's what he told me.
Then I I asked, "Okay, well, what about this this camera thing? Why would you grab the cameras?" And
he says, "Because the first thing that I thought is that I better secure the footage." and be
helpful and give that footage, hand that footage over to the feds. Well, obviously that's where
things get into a pickle with me because we don't trust the feds, right? I'm like, "No, we don't
trust the feds. So, we don't got to do that. Just let me have the footage." I'm like, "Just send me
the footage. Please let me look at it." There's a lot of conspiracies that are floating around right
now. People don't know what to believe. People are doing very, what I would say credible videos. Most
people that certainly uh have the credibility are ballistics experts that are saying that what
we see in the front is an exit wound, not an entry wound. I don't know one way or the other
because I'm not an expert. I'm getting inundated with messages from people that hunt, people that
are in the military saying that this had to come have come from another direction. This footage
could help. If as if nothing else, let me help you. Let me formally debunk that by seeing this
footage. like, "Could you send this footage over to me?" Well, he didn't want to send the footage
over to me without checking with Turning Point Lawyers. I said, "Look, technically, you own the
footage. Like, you you know, you and some other people own the footage. Like, let me just see the
footage because why why go through lawyers? Like, I just want to see the footage." And also, I
asked the question, why not just release it? We've already seen the worst thing that you could
possibly see from the front, right? Like, the front is what is a traumatiz traumatizing video.
And I understand that he wants to afford his wife some protection like this has you to experience
that Erica. So many people watching uh the love of your life in the last second of their life. It's
traumatizing. I'm traumatized by it. Right. That's not my husband and the father of my children.
And so out of a a loyalty to Erica, he also doesn't want to give more footage to the internet.
But I said, "Look, I'm not going to publish it. I just want to see it and um I think you should
let me see that because people trust me. They know that I'm very serious about this. I'm I don't care
about anything right now other than figuring out who killed Charlie Kirk. So, in the short run, he
agrees that rather than send the footage, he will get onto a FaceTime call with me and he will show
me the footage on his computer. He did that and I watched the footage and I'm going to tell you
what I saw. to the people specifically the um people that are in the military, people that
know weapons. I'm telling you this because you might be able to add more color or more clarity
here what you were what you would expect to see um if given the weapon that they have said did
this uh the bullet they have said did this. I don't know anything about any of this so I'm just
telling you what I saw. Okay. First and foremost, there is nothing gory about this shot at all. Um,
and so again, I am still going going to work with him to get me the footage so that um, I think
it should be shared. There's nothing there's nothing gory about this footage from the back. The
thing that really stood out to me, and I just kept asking him to replay it over and over and over
again, is that there's no blood. There's no blood um, from the back. There's there is no blood. So,
I think a lot of people were wondering whether or not that bullet pierced and went out the back. I
think I vaguely even remember. And Skyler, you can maybe live look this up, but like I thought the
feds were saying they were looking for a bullet at some point, which is now very alarming to me.
I don't understand that. How could they have been looking for a bullet? Because if I'm not seeing,
and there isn't, I'm telling you, what happens in the front is not what happens in the back at all.
Um, if I'm not seeing any blood, uh, what what are we to take from that? The only thing that could
make sense, if what they're saying is true and that person took the shot from the place that they
are saying that individual took the shot from, um, it would suggest that it it's it was inside
of Charlie, right? And they would know that, the feds would have known that. So they would
have communicated that they were never looking for a bullet because remember one shot. So I'm very
confused. I'm very confused not by what I saw but what I didn't see. Okay, that's pretty much all I
can tell you right now. And I am going to try to get all of the footage and I am again I understand
that right now he is very fearful. Um, but I am going to continue to try to privately push him to
just release it. I I believe that transparency is the only way. Um, I'm m much more I think all of
us would agree. Um, I in have much more trust in the people than I do in the feds. The feds are
lying about everything. So, they should not be the only people that have access to this. And I
understand not wanting to have that relived from another angle. But given the fact that there is
no gore and there is no blood from this angle, I don't see why not. Um, and so that's what I wanted
to share with you guys. I know some of you guys were uh insinuating. I got a lot of emails that it
could have been a fchette. I had to look that up. I don't even know what that is. I was like, "Guys,
I don't know anything fchet shells. That something could have been a lot closer that hit him and that
everything else could have been a distraction." All I can tell you is that um there's no blood.
That's it. There's no there is no blood in that video. So, give me your thoughts on that. Now, I
want to get to another tip that I received that is pretty interesting because look, as you guys know,
when I began investigating this assassination, at no point did I ever speculate that any other
country was involved. I never speculated that Israelis were involved. So, it was surprising to
say the least that they're simply pretending that I did, pretending that I blamed Israel, pretending
that um I said BBNet and Yahoo killed Charlie Kirk. It is now, like I said yesterday, it feels
like they are trying to get ahead of something like they know more than we know. I don't know
why you would say something or or accuse somebody of saying something that they didn't. I do believe
that there is very clearly, we all believe there's very clearly a government level conspiracy that
is involved. Okay? There's no other way to assess assess those disastrous uh text messages. Absolute
disaster of a fed operation with those messages. Yesterday I pretty casually mentioned to you guys
something um that the doorbell cam footage which TMZ happened upon somehow was from a street on
upon which a ton of employees that work for Calira Engineering live. We showed you I think one or
two of those employees. The husband and wife I had mentioned worked for Cal Calira Engineering
and it is a country that purports to manufacture valves. And I said this I said I know nothing
about the valve industry. All I know is that every time I start investigating a government
conspiracy or looking into people that are really shady like Harley Pastnick, thus far three
people who I've investigated who oddly either them or their families had backgrounds working
in this very niche valve and piping industry, like manufacturers of valves and pipes. Like is
everybody doing that? This is very strange. Well, many of you emailed me something that was
quite surprising. Maybe I'm just ignorant, but I they you let me know that this is a very
niche industry. And by niche, I mean that you asserted that it implies major government
contracts, likely the CIA, those of you who have worked at those industries, telling me that
there are even certain valves that are exclusively uh manufactured in Israel uh and that they tend
to be involved in this. the government and the military tend to be involved in this and that
even by the way on Calira's website they noted that they have worked in Israel they have a map
that they that they note every country that they have done engineering projects in and one of one
of them or two dots are in Israel and somebody explained why the government gets involved when
it comes to valves and piping and I'm just going to read you this email because maybe there are
people at home who are just as ignorant as I am about government level engineering ing. Okay, this
person wrote, "Hi, Candace. I wanted to share some detailed information regarding valves piping
and their relevance to critical infrastructure and intelligence communities. Valves as critical
infrastructure assets. Modern industrial valves are used in pipelines, water treatment plants,
power plants, and chemical facilities are often automated andworked, forming part of operational
technology and SCADA systems. This allows remote monitoring and control of the flow of gas, oil,
water, and chemicals. Cyber security implications. These valves are part of systems that could be
targeted for cyber attacks. Compromised valves can cause pipeline ruptures, water contamination,
or industrial accidents. Because of this, intelligence and regulatory agencies, the uh CISA,
NSA, PH, MSA, FERC monitor valve networks and may maintain trusted relationships with manufacturers
and engineers to ensure security and resilience. Integration with above ground systems. Modern
valve networks can also integrate with cameras, sensors, alarms, and environmental monitoring.
This means that an operator could simultaneously monitor flow, view live video, and respond
to alarms, which enhances both security and operational oversight and strategic value
for intelligence communities. Knowledge of Valve locations, models, and control systems
provide insight into critical infrastructure vulnerabilities. Access to or relationships with
manufacturers allows agencies to monitor, assess, and secure supply chains. Remote monitoring
of valves and integrated systems can support emergency response simulations and national
security exercises. And then they provide us with a real world contact context by writing
companies like Caldera Engineering in Provo, Utah manufacture specialized industrial valves
and control systems. While no public evidence currently links them to intelligence contracts,
their products could theoretically be part of OT systems monitored by government agencies due to
the critical nature of the infrastructure that they serve. In short, valves themselves are simple
mechanical devices, but when embedded in critical infrastructure, they become strategically
important for monitoring, security, and intelligence purposes. That just sounds right to
me. that I mean I'm telling you when I every story I'm like what is this this person it's like their
family's in vow like I mean I don't know anybody whose family did this I don't know again like
this is the kind of stuff that like we don't know but we know and that hit and I feel like there
is a bigger piece of this that involves Calira and like I said I perceive a government conspiracy
you'd be a fool not to see a government conspiracy here especially with the way that I am being
attacked for simply trying to investigate this and the attacks are growing frantic it's almost as if
They all received an email from somebody who said, "I don't care what you say. Make it up out of thin
air and do not stop attacking Candace Owens." That is the loudest. Um, it's like an alarm went off
and everyone people that I thought I was friends with are coming after me with obscene lies that
are just so easily fact checked, so easily you could debunk them in 4 seconds on the internet and
they're delivering it as though it's honest. We're going to talk about that. I was even surprised
PBD I mean I've always been friendly with him. I've always been kind to him. I've nothing wrong
to him and he seems to be kind of uh he's the one who platformed without any push back. Eric Bowling
and I have an idea about uh why all that may be. I'll tell you in just a second. First want to
remind you guys about Goland because what if smart contract platforms were not controlled
by the elites or big tech? What if they were built by and for real builders? You know the the
people. That's the question that goand asked and that's why they built Gnoland. They started with
Golang which is a language real world developers already use and they built a new platform around
it. It's transparent. It's intuitive and it just makes sense. There's not some confusing system
of ones and zeros. It's open source. So imagine GitHub but designed for onchain collaboration and
composability. Builders actually get credit for their work and they get rewarded. So every every
time that their code gets used, that's the real value. It's not likes, there's not clout, it's
actual rewards. GN Oand rejected proof of stake, which is a system where the rich run the show.
They went instead with proof of authority, a DAIO where contributors and not bad actors or Silicon
Valley actually call the shots. Gno.land is open. It's fair and honestly, it's pretty unstoppable.
So, if you are a builder, a freedom lover, or just tired of rigged platforms, please check it out
over at gno.land/candis. Again, that's gn.andcas. Now, I have watched too many people who I am close
to be vilified for standing up for the truth. I have felt the sting of injustice myself, but I've
also felt something else, which is courage. I am done playing defense. I'm not going to water down
what I believe to be palatable because silence is not kindness at all. It's it's consent in many
ways. And right now, the greatest silence is around the lives that are being ended before they
take their first breath. If we're going to call ourselves defenders of life, then we have to act
like that. That's why I'm asking you guys to join me to fight back with action, with truth, with
love. Uh for just $28, that is what it costs to give a free ultrasound to a woman that's in crisis
and considering an abortion. Uh you can help her to see the life that is growing inside of her and
to give her truth that the culture won't. So don't sit this out. Do not wait for permission. Be bold.
Be clear. Be unapologetic in your pro-life stance. Go to pre-born.org/candace right now. Give $28.
Give 10 times that if you can actually because this is the line and it's time to stand on it. We
must stand for truth and what is right. We must save lives from abortion and stand firm in the
gospel. Again, that is pre-born.org/candace to provide an ultrasound for just $28. Also telling
you guys about the wellness company because it is flu season, which means that it's also flu shot
season. After everything that we've been through over the last 5 years, the number of people
getting flu shots is at a record low. I'm so grateful for that. Not to mention the fact that
according to the CDC's own data, the flu shot is only moderately effective at best, and that's not
even accounting for vaccine injuries. There is a much better way to stay healthy. Grab a contagion
emergency kit from the wellness company. If you wake up with a sore throat or runny nose, address
your symptoms immediately with a doctor prescribed kit containing ivormectin, hydroxychloricquin, uh
generic tamlu, generic Zpack, and much more. It's like having an urgent care clinic in your own
home. I have a contagion emergency kit from the wellness company because I refuse to be trapped in
line at an emergency room or to rely on expensive insurance if I catch a cold. I simply open my kit,
reference the doctor written guide book for safe use, and I get back to life. This kit is literally
a lifesaver with thousands of reviews from people just like you and me who have had the kit ready in
a time of need. So head over to twwc.health/canis today and use code candace to save $48. Get it
now before cold and flu season kicks into high gear. twwc.alth/candace Health/Candice with code
Candace. $48 off. The kits are available to US residents only. Okay. All right. So, let's get
into uh how weird these headlines are getting. It's it's very strange. And I think we know
why it's happening. We obviously know why it's happening. But even the publications that are
usually not so blatant because in order to be a propagandist, you want to be effective, right?
You got to like lie a little and get people to believe you. not just do things that are just
so nakedly deceptive that people go, "Okay, why am I even reading this publication?" Well,
the Daily Mail put out this headline about me. I can't even like this. Look at this journalist
Victoria Churchill who reached out. She writes, "Candice Owens rages after being snubbed from
the Charlie Kirk Memorial speaking roster." What? When did this happen? Like, the lying here
is actually making me uncomfortable. I told you yesterday that we received way too many emails
about Charlie's memorial. All of them were asking specifically for me to confirm that I was going.
Didn't feel good to me. It felt very inauthentic. I know these journalists are not my friends. I
knew they were writing hit pieces, but all of them included that question. Do you like are you
going? Are you going to go? Like you want me to confirm my attendance so that you know where I'm
going to be ahead of time? Am I being paranoid? Does that seem like a little weird? Even on PBD's
show where he just gives a platform to a guest to completely lie for two minutes straight, there
is this random second where PBD rather oddly says something along the lines of, "You don't think
she's going to the funeral?" Like, they're keep talking about this. Take a listen again. At
some point, her credibility, I mean, is going to go down the tubes because she needs to bring
receipts. Bill Aman brought receipts. How long was that tweet? It's still going. I think he was there
in the room. Andrew Kovit was there in the room. You're on the board of Turning Point. Yeah. Okay.
When's the last time you saw Candace Owens in person? Yeah. 2015, 2016. Okay. Yeah. When's the
last time she was at a Turning Point event? Uh, not in many years. Okay. So, let's based there's
a witness even involved in Kirk's life. No at all. No question proof that Candace Owens is nothing
has nothing to do. She would be in in a perfect world if if they didn't have this what I already
know was a is a very quiet breakup where she got too rabbit hole for him. She would be the logical
error to the TPUSA throne. But she's not she's not even invited. Correct. So this is this is their
divide is Wait a minute. Not invited meaning she's not even there. Yeah. She's not she's not
one of the names that you don't think she'll be at the funeral. No, no, no. She doesn't speak at
the events anymore. Okay. So, first and foremost, why did they all want to know if I was going to
this event? I said there is no way we are going to this event now. There's a 0% chance. First and
foremost, why are you saying but anybody can go to it. You just buy a ticket to the event and you're
all working to try to get me to confirm that I'm going. And you're doing this as if you're trying
to like push my buttons and be like, "We got to make her get into her ego so she like shows up
and like post it on social media." Nope. Actually, you know, while I'm attacking the feds, maybe
not going to a public event, uh, which the feds are organizing, is probably a very good idea. I'm
good. You know what I'm going to do? I'm going to listen to Power on my headphones and go see Yay.
How's that for a memorial for Charlie Kirk? That feels like the right thing for me to do right now.
I mean, I'm I'm not going to this memorial cuz it's strange. uh to lie like this is very strange.
For context, just so you can realize how odd this is. I spoke at Turning Point's conference, two
conferences last year. It's it's so easily, like I said, debunkable that you have to ask yourself why
they are saying it. Here is me speaking on Turning Point USA's stage last year. And here's what I
said, by the way, which got Charlie in a lot of trouble. Well, let me tell you something, America.
It does. It does feel so good to go everywhere in the world and to realize that there is awakening
not just happening here. Let me tell you guys, it's happening all across the globe. People are
starting to ask the hard questions. And you know, you start getting close when they start to call
you names. They instantly want to suggest that there's something wrong and there's something
backwards about being America first. You're starting to hear the way they're framing that
now. When you say you're America first, they'll ask you, "What do you mean you're America first?
Do you mean that you're you're an isolationist? Do you believe that we should we shouldn't have
did what we did during World War II? All of these things trying to pollute it. It's not that
difficult. America first. First name America, last name first. We put this country's interests
before the interests of foreign countries overseas. All of them. I don't care. Yeah. It kind
of went on and on, but it was kind of me saying, especially since three months earlier, I had
gotten fired from the Daily Wire. Like, Israel, you're not special. And yeah, Charlie got in
trouble for the stuff that I said on stage and then they came inward. Uh, I told that I was not
allowed to speak at ABFest. The donors were making threats, but like I went on tour with Charting
Point last year. It's so on their website. It's so This is like the strangest thing. We could
pull up this website. Live free tour. Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens. Quiet breakup. What do we
Why are we doing this? It's very strange. Here's all the places that we went to last year. Now,
they are pushing these headlines that are so far beyond the realm of reality, like the one that
I just showed you where they say that I'm angry. And then when you look into who's writing these
articles, like Victoria Churchill, you note that she has a connection to Apac. So, Apac is pushing
this, right? The answer is implied by the people who are attacking me. They are all ultra Zionists,
right? Like I said, the author of that article is an ultra Zionist. And here she is starting off
2018 in DC. And she's got a picture of herself. If you can scroll down, I don't know if you can
see this, like sitting in the audience in Apac. And she's thrilled. America, Israel. It's like all
of these people are agents for a foreign country. And I feel like BB Netanyahu is spending a lot of
money right now. He he is just way too involved. uh concerned about TurningPoint USA, the future
of Turning Point USA attacking Candace Owens. And I think something sinister is going on here. How
can you not see that? I also want to say this. I have had a flood of Turning Point employees reach
out to me. Maybe because he says she would have been the natural heir to Turning Point USA. I'm
not trying to be the air to Turning Point USA. I kind of like my life. I don't want to take money
from donors, okay? Because they do what they did to Charlie. They're not buying they're not they're
not donating money to charity because they view it as a charity. They doing it because they want
to purchase your voice. That's it. And I don't want to give mine up. But what these people are
telling me is a very dark story that involves these donors, sponsors, uh influencers, a takeover
of sorts that I think was happening right under Charlie's nose. And I want to say this formally as
we keep investigating this. I believe that Charlie Kirk was betrayed by people who are close to him.
Based on what I have seen thus far, the evidence, the quote unquote receipts that require a way
deeper um uh investigation into the apparatus, the financial apparatus at Turning Point. There
was definitely some weird activity leading up to this moment happening at the organization. And
I've been able to verify it. I have been given names and I intend to now embark on this lengthier
investigation which I need more help on. I've reached out to some journalists. I'm sharing the
information with them. Uh and I think we're going to discover uh that this was ugly, uglier than we
could have ever imagined. Okay. There is a fear here that we are all perceiving, a desperation
almost to end the investigation. The smears are becoming radical. radical. You can't just pretend
Candace hasn't spoken to Charlie Kirk in years, but they're doing it and they're trying to be
convincing and shocked and putting this out. I I've never stopped talking to Charlie. I mean,
yesterday I released just one of many messages that I have with Charlie, which proved that he
was in the months leading up to this concerned about Israel and how Israel was coming after
our free speech. Free speech meant a lot to him. Right? This message is from May. We can pull that
back up, right? Charlie sent me his tweet because after the assassination of Sarah Mgram and Yuron
Lachinsky in DC, people were calling for like hate speech laws and Charlie were, you know, authored
a long tweet saying these were beautiful people. They had their lives ahead of them. But I must
push back against one thing and again it was just the justification that this somehow meant that
we had to um you know get rid of free speech you know like it suddenly like oh well this happened
so now we need to say free speech is wrong and so I wrote back to him uh and I said great tweet and
he gave prayer hands and I said speech censorship is coming to America and he wrote back as you can
see and the date here is May 22nd of this year. It totally is. Okay. Me and Megan and Tucker
are not lying to you. Charlie was concerned about the speech that he felt the restrictions and
inevitably this happens when you get into bed with Israel. You can't criticize them at all. As Megan
said before you start enduring threats. And what I have learned from the employees there is that
back in May, Turning Point had some big changes, some odd changes as they are describing it to me.
certain departments, people that were being fired, people that were told that they had to keep
certain things a secret. Secret from whom? Secret from whom? Something is not right. Nothing
we are being told is true. And the strangest thing is that Pam Bondi, who is a complete loser and
a tool, is trying to use the assassination of Charlie Kirk to lay the groundwork for hate speech
laws in America. The very thing that Charlie was fighting against. They all just got right to
work trying to pass laws. Well, Charlie Kirk is now we got hate speech is something. Exactly
what he's messaging me about that he doesn't want to happen. They're trying to use his death to
justify. Listen to what Pam Bondi said to Katie Miller on her podcast. Take a listen. There's free
speech and then there's hate speech. No. And there is no place, especially now, especially after
what happened to Charlie in our society. Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups
who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people so we show them that some action is better
than no action? we will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate
speech, anything. And that's across the aisle. So to be clear, that's the feds telling you that they
want to pass speech laws which will basically just give them the full power to go after you for
wrong think. Okay? And they're doing it in the most disturbing way ever by going after Charlie
Kirk's legacy and using his assassination to say, "Oh, well, now we've got to pass we've got
to get hate speech done." Which, by the way, who was the person in the leader who said that he
was passing laws against speech in America? That was BB Netany and Yahoo, okay, years ago on record
saying that he was working with the government of America and any person that criticized Israel
would find themselves on the wrong side of the law. Okay? You can find that clip of him
saying that. And now what's happening? Well, we have an occupied administration. There's no
question Trump is occupied by Zionists. Okay? He's completely impotent. He's completely powerless. He
cannot say anything um that goes against Israel or BB Netanyahu. He's letting them do whatever they
want. He no push back whatsoever. It's very clear BB is in control. And his administration is saying
that. It's terrible. It's absolutely terrible. But this was the plan. Okay. This was the plan and we
have to stand up to this guys. We have to fight this tooth and nail. The reason they're doing
this obviously is because they can't win in the free markets. People are, as Megan said, people
that are under 30 are anti-Israel. So that means the future of America is anti-Israel. So what
they're going to try to do is to pass speech laws, bullshik speech laws. They're going to arrest
us for for saying that we don't support Israel. Something that Charlie was passionately against.
Okay. Okay. And we can show you next week clips of him hosting uh the debate about speech and Israel
and whether or not everything was anti-semitism. And he was very clear in his perception that this
is going to increase anti-semitism trying to pass speech laws or leaving people anti-semites by
criticizing BB Netany and Yahoo. It's all out there and they're lying to you. Am I wrong for am
I cynical for believing that? Yeah. The feds are obviously lying and I would say at some level in a
very big way were involved in the death of Charlie because they wanted this sort of radical way to
push through laws. When something chaotic happens, we usually turn to the government. I mean 9/11,
what did we do? We gave them so much power, right? The Patriot Act, you do whatever. Just keep
me safe. It's like they they see your emotion. They see this global emotion and they want you
to just agree with them that the next step is more power for the government. And this time we're
saying no. No, Pam Bondi, no thank you. Genuinely, why are you in office? How can this administration
pretend that they are the same administration that they were in 2016 that were fighting against this?
The same administration that was going, "Oh, well, the George Floyd death, radical Dems, BLM, speech
laws, it was wrong when the left did it, and it's wrong now that the right is doing it." Which leads
me to believe that we are fighting opposite sides of the same coin. It's us versus them. The elites
versus the rest of us. That's it. Everything else is a mirage. And speaking of free speech, I want
to speak about Jimmy Kim Kimmel because he has been pulled off air indefinitely over his comments
in the aftermath of Charlie's assassination. So, let's take a listen to what Jimmy Kimmel said
on his show. We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying
to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing
everything they can to score political points from it. In between the fingerpointing there was uh
grieving on Friday. The White House flew the flags at half staff which got some criticism but on a
human level you can see how hard the president is taking this. My condolences on the loss of your
friend Charlie Kirk. May I ask sir personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a
half, sir? I think very good. And by the way, right there you see all the trucks. They've
just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something
they've been trying to get, as you know, for about 150 years. And it's going to be a
beauty. Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. Demolition. Construction. This is
not how an adult grieavves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four-year-old
mourns a goldfish. Okay, so that's what he said. Whether or not you think it it was a insensitive
joke, okay, I don't think that that would have been the justification for saying that he now
needs to donate to charity and lose his whole life. And this is what happened. He's he's
taken off air. And some people are saying, "Hey, Candace, they did this to us." And you're
not wrong, right? If you are on the right and you are saying that when the whole George Floyd
thing happened, people lost their jobs for saying sensible things or making a joke, you are correct,
like you are right to say yes, that absolutely did happen. But if you're not recognizing that when
you just flip the coin, it's the same people that are gaining more power. I just want the attacks on
free speech to stop. Okay? I want the reaction. if you're angry about what Jimmy Kimmel said
is for the free markets to take him out, right? He doesn't have a show because nobody's
watching him anymore because they're so disgusted by what he said. That's what I want. I want us
to be in control, right, of where we spend our dollars of what we're saying and not like the
government to pass a but press a button and say you lose everything because we don't like what
you said. And it should be noted, by the way, that in the same monologue, he did call the
murder senseless. the day that it happened, Jimmy Kimmel posted a message on Instagram sending
love to the Kirk family, to the victims of gun violence, he posted, you know, instead of the
angry fingerpointing, can we just for one day agree that that it's horrible and monstrous to
shoot another person. On behalf of my family, we send love to the Kirks and to all the children,
parents, and innocents who fall victim to senseless gun violence. You wouldn't have thought
that he had posted that uh in terms of everyone that were just like strip him of everything. And
I want to be clear, I don't like Jimmy Kimmel, right? I I think he is a part of the radical left.
The people that are constantly shouting make I don't like him at all. But I'm just recognizing
that our our solution to being angry at each other always seems to be let's give the government more
power, right? Let's give the the government more power. And that's what happened here. Okay. The
chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, jumped up and he criticized uh Jimmy
Kimmel's remarks. He threatened federal action against ABC affiliates who carried the show. What?
Federal action? If you carry the Jimmy Kimmel show, does that seem right to you? Okay. Again,
if you're on the right and you cheered this on, do you understand? We never ever ever should be
applauding federal action when it comes to speech. Okay, we're all losing. We are all losing. You
have to wake up. That's what happened. Brendan Carr of the FCC uh was joining Benny Johnson and
that's that's what he said that he absolutely wants to make sure that people are not carrying
this show anymore and that after you know one of the mergers that they did. I just see the same
people are constantly being empowered and I want to point that out to you because you have to be
more conscious of that. It's like they use our emotions left versus right uh to manipulate all of
us and it's completely wrong and it's completely crazy. And they're also calling for him to uh
make a meaningful personal donation to the Kirk family and Turning Point USA. What? That's that's
that's a shakeddown. That's what they did to Kyrie Irving. I don't like what you said. Donate to the
Holocaust Museum. What? I can't cheer this on, guys. I'm sorry. I can't cheer this on because I
don't like it. I know for a fact, as I just showed you, that this was Charlie's fear. The government
coming in on speech. That's what's happening right now. They're taking over our speech under the
guise of fighting hate. Tik Tok, by the way, did you guys see this? Um, Israel's pretty much taking
over Tik Tok. There's no other way to say it. Um, Mark Andre in on a deal with uh I think it's a
silver Silver Capital. What is it? Not Silver Lake. They're all coming together and we knew this
was going to happen. This whole fake can Tik Tok. No, Tik Tok was going pro Palestine and a bunch
of hedge fun hedge fund people who are pro-Israel got involved. Trump pretended that he was going to
rescue speech. No, he's handing it over to Israel. Okay, wake up. You're a Trump supporter.
Wake up. Okay, he has handed so much over to Israel and he's about to hand over the keys
to our speech. All that aside, all that aside, I do want to shout out all the creators that are
making me laugh. Let's use our speech while we're still allowed to have it. And you also have to
remember Charlie wanted us to be happy warriors. So while we are fighting for truth, while we are
fighting for transparency, we we should remember that we should laugh and we should be happy. And
the clips that you guys are making regarding how the feds think that we speak after that ridiculous
madeup text chain between Tyler Robinson and his lover Lance. They're hilarious. Your Tik Toks
and the videos are hilarious. I'm going to show you just one here. This is Chris Olsen. Chris
Olsen. He's actually over on Instagram. Take a listen. Good day, my love. I have just committed
one of the highest sins of the Lord. Murder. I must flee the country now in my vehicle. I have
hidden the weapon. It was mine. I won't see you for a very long time unless you come with me.
If not, I will see you after the war, my love. Why is that so accurate? What went wrong? FBI,
what went wrong? Speak to us. Let us help you. You guys just old. Like, what's going on? I actually
think there was a person on TikTok, I hate to not credit them, but I genuinely don't remember what
handle it was. cuz I was just scrolling through, but he suggested that what went wrong was
that they did use AI and in their AI prompt, they said to create a conversation uh between
20 year olds or like a conversation between 20-year-olds, but they actually wrote like the
AI understood it as like not people in their 20s, but like people in the 20s, like the 1920s. And
I was like, that actually could have been what went wrong. They prompted AI and they said between
people in their 20s and actually they wrote people in the 20s and they just went with it and that's
why you have this hello my love. It's so bad. It's a major blunder. It's a very bad blunder you guys.
But I'm happy it happened because everything is coming undone. We're exposing everything. We're
going to figure out everything and I feel good about that. So, um, yeah, that's that's what I'm
doing this weekend. In memorial of Charlie Kirk, I'm going to keep investigating every single lead
until I solve his murder. What are you doing? What are you doing? Get some of your comments. Also,
I want to respond to some of you guys that were emailing us about the the Dairy Queen photo. You
were like, "This is an old photo. It could be from July. There's a poster Superman." I'll explain to
you why that poster that picture was definitely not taken in July. First, I want to tell you guys
about pure talk because our society works because of the freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Free speech. Okay? Even if I hate your speech, I want you to have it. Everyday Americans
should be able to speak openly and they should be able to speak honestly about family,
their traditional values without any retribution, obviously. And that's the principle that Pure
Talk proudly supports. They sponsor my show, which allows me to stand strong behind the microphone
every day and share truth with you guys. If you want to support brands that defend freedom
and pro-American values, I encourage you to switch your wireless service to Pure Talk. you are
going to get great 5G coverage and uh an extremely reliable and secure network. And with plans from
just $25 a month, you'll save a ton of money. Pure Talk believes in creating American jobs
and supporting small business. So, if you're a small business owner, you can save even more while
enjoying white glove service. Stand with companies who share your values. Go to puretalk.com/owens
to switch to my wireless company, Pure Talk, right now. You will save an additional 50% off
your first month. Again, visit puretalk.com/owens to make a switch today. Also remind you guys about
American Financing because if you have been living on credit cards just to cover groceries, gas,
and bills, you know those interest rates are absolutely brutal. Why keep paying 20% or more to
the banks when you could just call my friends at American Financing? Because they have mortgage
rates right now that are in the fives. And they are showing people every day how to keep more of
their hard-earned money in their own pocket and out of the hands of credit card companies. Right
now, American Financing is helping homeowners save an average of about $800 a month by using their
home equity to wipe out high interest debt. And there are no upfront fees, no obligations,
and it's really just a 10-minute call that you make to a salary based mortgage consultant.
There's also another kicker. If you start today, you could delay two mortgage payments, which
puts even more cash in your hands right away. So, don't wait. Call American Financing right now. The
number is 8007951210. Again, that's 8007951210. Or you can visit americananfinancing.net/owens.
Again, that's americanfing.net/owens. All right, let's get into some of your comments.
First, I want to tell you guys the Dairy Queen photo. Some of you guys noticed that there was
this old Superman poster and that Superman in the background there. Uh that poster you said
it they removed those ads back in June or July. Um you are correct. That's when that movie came
out and that's when they were scheduled to remove those ads. But rest assure first and foremost
for two reasons that that is not definitely is not footage from July. uh July, just so you guys
understand, there is not a place in the world that would have the bandwidth to keep 24-hour footage
inside of their restaurant dating back months. It autodees I think the footage uh at my house
because we have cameras absolutely everywhere. I think it's like every 48 hours, every 72 hours. I
think the highest you might see that is one week. This is absolutely by the way. How would that
person have known to go back to July? Could you imagine having to scroll through the footage
and be like, I think I one time saw that person in July eating something here. Let's go back and
scrub. Like that's just that definitely did not happen. The source we had was very solid. It
was very specific. And also saying that they threw away clothes in the nearby cemetery was very
specific. This person was very confident when they shared it. But also something else that lets you
date it. pull back up that photo is behind right they're advertising available now what that
actually is is a and I got to remember the name of it it's um I don't know why I didn't write
down a maple leaf blizzard thing it's maple leaf something that dropped and they began using those
advertisements for that drink on August 31st. So, the absolute earliest that could have been
taken is August 31st and that's if they put up that advertisement immediately. Yes, the maple
cookie shake. That's what it was. Um, they began advertising on August 31st, so it's not from July.
And like I said, I feel very confident about our source and we are taking a look at everything.
You guys have sent me so much more by the way, which I'm going to get into this weekend in
memorial of Charlie Kirk about the house next door. some weird stuff uh that was happening
at that house, what has been advertised at that vacant house where the locals believe that's the
real place that the shooter went to. And people are telling me a lot of stuff about CIA action
at UVU, some programs that they had been running, that there's a pipeline from people at UVU
to people that go and work for the CIA. So, there's a lot to investigate, but I also want to
be given the time to fact check everything. Um, so that we don't go after the wrong people.
Again, if you have any tips, any photos, you know where to send them. Candace, I mean, that's
not right. Don't send it there. Tips@candice.com. And yeah, for those of you guys who have
supported uh this, thank you so much. Like I said yesterday and the day before, we see
you in the comments fighting for us. And I will say it is a good thing they're attacking
this hard. It's actually waking more people up. People are watching my show, watching them
lie, debunking their lies, and going, "Okay, why did they do that?" Like, why why would
PBD do that? Like, we've always been friends, friendly. He was very kind to me. I've always
been kind to him. Why just allow these people to lie? There's so many lies just in that one
segment. It's stunning to me. Even when he says, "Andrew Kovette was there in the Hamptons."
No, he wasn't. Andrew Kovitt was definitely not there in the Hamptons. What are you lying
about? It's very strange. Is there like are you being paid to lie or do you actually believe
those lies? I don't know. Um but all I know is that I'm not going to get distracted by them.
We are going to solve the murder of my friend Charlie Kirk. And if you guys would like to
support us, we are independent. As I tell you, you can sign up at our website, canon.com. Buy
yourself this. This is pretty bomb. Yep. Our CIA line. This is the Canis Intelligence Agency.
Some people think that it actually says like CIA, the Decentralized Intelligent Agency. I love it.
Our products are great. Uh, and that's way that you can just show support and show um some love.
In the meantime, let's just bop some Kanye power this weekend. I'm going to hit him up. That's what
we're going to do. I'll see you guys on Monday.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.