[00:03] My friend,
[00:05] Candace Owens,
[00:10] it's not breaking any social rule or
[00:13] moral boundary. No regulation is being
[00:16] traversed. Oh, no, no, no, no.
[00:18] She's doing the one thing
[00:20] [cough and clears throat]
[00:21] that modern institutions fear most.
[00:25] And this is it. This is the essence of
[00:29] why her case and this issue is so
[00:31] critical.
[00:33] She is refusing to stop asking
[00:35] questions. When power tells her the
[00:38] conversation is over, when they say,
[00:40] "All right, all right, honey. That's
[00:42] enough." She says, "Oh, no, no, no, no,
[00:43] no, no. God, love her."
[00:47] Yes.
[00:49] And that alone explains the intensity of
[00:51] the backlash. Because
[00:54] when an official narrative
[00:57] is solid,
[00:59] it doesn't require, in fact, it never
[01:01] requires emotional pressure or a loyalty
[01:04] test or character smears or defamation
[01:08] or this coordinated outrage.
[01:13] It's all in order to defend it. it can
[01:16] survive scrutiny and analysis and
[01:18] evaluation and timelines and
[01:19] documentation and daylight and all that
[01:21] stuff. And when Candace Owens
[01:25] has consistently pointed out
[01:29] is not some exotic or speculative
[01:33] theory, but a pattern that Americans
[01:37] have now seen
[01:39] repeat across multiple high-profile
[01:42] events. An event occurs, an official
[01:45] story is locked almost immediately
[01:49] concretized.
[01:51] Media outlets move in near unison.
[01:54] Descent is reframed as cruelty or
[01:58] irresponsibility or something instead of
[02:00] of disagreement. And the public is
[02:03] warned that further analysis or inquiry
[02:06] or questioning
[02:08] is dangerous. It's inappropriate. It's
[02:10] harmful. It's immoral. It's painful.
[02:12] It's disrespectful. Yet in every in
[02:16] every single legitimate investigation,
[02:19] the opposite is true. The exact
[02:21] opposite.
[02:23] Clarity.
[02:24] Clarity reduces speculation.
[02:28] Transparency that we look for calms
[02:30] suspicion. And facts actually close
[02:33] doors that rumors pry open. And the
[02:37] reason that Candace's questions resonate
[02:41] and reverberate
[02:43] and do something to you where you say,
[02:45] "Yeah,"
[02:47] is simply because they are the same
[02:49] questions any competent investigator
[02:53] would ask if their job depended on
[02:56] accuracy rather than optics.
[03:00] questions about timelines,
[03:02] about who [snorts] arrived when, about
[03:05] what security measures were in place,
[03:08] what protocols were or were not
[03:11] followed.
[03:13] This is what's interesting. This is
[03:15] fascinating. This is the story. And this
[03:18] is why I keep telling people.
[03:21] See, this is what's critical. What was
[03:24] done? What was ordinary? What was real?
[03:27] What was collected immediately?
[03:30] Why why were things done this way? Who
[03:33] made those decisions under what
[03:34] authority? By by what authority and and
[03:36] and whether explanations for those
[03:39] decisions have remained
[03:43] consistent,
[03:45] consistent over time. Because my friend,
[03:48] inconsistencies,
[03:50] listen to me, as a former prosecutor, as
[03:53] a trial lawyer, I know what I'm talking
[03:55] about. Inconsistencies are not minor
[03:58] details. They are
[04:01] fault lines.
[04:03] And when the explanations shift, when
[04:06] officials
[04:08] overexlain these kind of peripheral
[04:10] issues, but refuse to address the
[04:13] central ones, the main ones,
[04:15] when these statements that are given
[04:17] contradict each other across interviews,
[04:21] when these
[04:23] weird press conferences and media
[04:26] events,
[04:28] media events, book tours, other stuff,
[04:31] when documents and skepticism aren't
[04:34] reckless.
[04:36] It is rational. It is understood. It is
[04:38] absolutely correct. and and and what has
[04:40] fueled concern is not curiosity but this
[04:43] resistance to and I'm going to keep
[04:45] saying it transparency
[04:47] truth because whenever the response to
[04:50] questions becomes
[04:52] you know this moral condemnation this
[04:55] righteous indignation that somebody's
[04:57] hiding something and rather than
[04:59] clarification people instinctively
[05:01] almost reflectively uh recognize that
[05:04] something something's being managed
[05:05] something doesn't make any sense
[05:06] something stinks Why? Why are they
[05:09] controlling the narrative versus
[05:11] explaining it? And this is where this is
[05:14] where Candace Owens has been
[05:16] deliberately mischaracterized.
[05:18] She's been called every name in the
[05:21] book. She's an anti-semite. She's a
[05:24] She's a She's a conspiracy theorist.
[05:26] She's crazy. She I mean, my god, is
[05:29] there anything else? She's a She's a
[05:31] serial killer. Well, that that's next.
[05:34] She's crazy.
[05:36] And as soon as I heard her being called
[05:37] a security a maybe that too, but a but a
[05:41] uh conspiracy theorist, I'm in. Oh, I'm
[05:44] in with that one. That's my
[05:46] neighborhood.
[05:48] They do that to me all the time and
[05:50] always have been. And maybe it's
[05:52] personal to me.
[05:55] And when she's not demanding
[05:56] conclusions, she's demanding standards.
[05:59] She's not asking you or viewers or
[06:01] anybody for that matter to believe her.
[06:04] She's asking institutions to show their
[06:06] work. It's not about me, it's about you.
[06:10] And that distinction matters because in
[06:12] a functioning democracy, in a
[06:14] functioning democratic republic, which
[06:16] is constitutional republic, which is we
[06:17] are, the burden of proof rests with the
[06:19] authority, not with her, not with
[06:21] citizens, not with us. We don't have to
[06:23] prove anything. Yet the modern media
[06:26] reflex has flipped that equation. You
[06:29] notice that they tell the public to
[06:31] trust first and then verify. Never. Stop
[06:35] worrying about it. Quit what? What? What
[06:37] do you want proof for? Trust us. Why
[06:40] would we lie to you? Accept early claims
[06:44] as final truth. Quit asking your
[06:46] questions. Treat evolving and developing
[06:50] facts as settled history.
[06:52] And to view, this is important,
[06:54] skepticism as a character flaw. There
[06:58] you go again, Candace. Always asking
[07:00] questions, always want to know this
[07:02] truth. You and your truth,
[07:05] huh? Think I'm exaggerating.
[07:10] They treat her like she's crazy rather
[07:11] than somebody exhibiting a civic
[07:14] responsibility. And this kind of
[07:16] inversion is exactly why people across
[07:19] political and cultural lines find
[07:22] Candace Owens to be not only courageous
[07:24] and interesting and brilliant, but
[07:26] credible. Credible even when they don't
[07:29] agree with her on everything else. You
[07:31] don't have to agree with her on
[07:32] everything else because she articulates
[07:36] she articulates a fatigue. That's a big
[07:39] word, you know, fatigue, but a fatigue
[07:41] that's widespread.
[07:44] She talks about an exhaustion that we're
[07:46] feeling with being told that asking
[07:48] obvious questions is something and
[07:50] somehow radical, that noticing
[07:53] contradictions
[07:55] is
[07:57] malicious.
[07:59] They tell you that accountability is
[08:01] disrespectful. They tell you that
[08:02] silence is the the the the price of
[08:05] being considered a good citizen, decent,
[08:08] a good American. That's right. Play
[08:10] along. Don't ask questions. Don't ask
[08:12] questions about Charlie or anything else
[08:14] for that matter. Don't ask questions. We
[08:16] will tell you what the facts are. You
[08:18] will memorize them. You will commit them
[08:19] to memory in this wrote patella
[08:21] recitation and that's it. And the
[08:23] emotional lever most often pulled by
[08:26] these people is to enforce the idea that
[08:29] silence somehow is grief.
[08:32] which is real and deserving of respect.
[08:34] Don't you understand?
[08:37] This is about car about Erica. Don't ask
[08:40] questions. Shout you no decency.
[08:45] They wear as like some kind of armor
[08:48] like you know this this this protects
[08:50] them when when when these public
[08:51] narratives
[08:53] and public authority and public trust
[08:55] are all involved because let me tell you
[08:57] something. Compassion and scrutiny,
[08:59] believe it or not, are not opposites.
[09:02] They coexist. Because if you believe in
[09:04] Charlie and if you believe in his legacy
[09:06] and if you believe in him and other
[09:09] particular issues not going by the
[09:11] wayside, not being subject to the United
[09:13] States of Amnesia, as Gore Vidal calls
[09:15] it, you will continue. And that's why I
[09:17] respect her. That's it. And they're
[09:20] going after her left and right.
[09:23] Some people, some woolcapped
[09:27] edge doppelgangers
[09:29] speak of Candace with disrespect and
[09:32] vile,
[09:34] I'm sorry, misogynistic tropes, which
[09:36] are a little weird.
[09:40] Little weird
[09:42] dreaded seawword epithets, which I find
[09:45] particularly distasteful. Look, if you
[09:47] don't like her, that's fine. Don't
[09:48] listen to her. You know your people are
[09:50] under no obligation to hear what she has
[09:52] to say.
[09:54] See these things that I'm talking about
[09:56] they coexist in every series
[09:57] investigation.
[09:59] And history is full of cases where early
[10:01] restraint in the name of sensitivity
[10:04] later collapses into scandal because you
[10:06] have to be ready to jump into this
[10:09] immediately. immediately precisely
[10:11] because questions were suppressed and
[10:14] you you deal with them initially not
[10:16] later on
[10:18] when they when they suppress questions
[10:20] rather than answer them. This is why
[10:22] Candace Owens's message and her critics
[10:25] by the way keep missing the point. They
[10:27] argue that tone,
[10:30] tone instead of substance matters.
[10:32] [clears throat]
[10:33] Motive, what's the motivation instead of
[10:35] evidence? I don't care about mo motiv
[10:38] motivation, intent, why you did
[10:40] something. They accuse her all the time
[10:42] of of of profiting. That's my favorite
[10:44] of profiting rather than addressing
[10:46] inconsistencies
[10:47] because we've got and please with all
[10:49] due respect to Erica, with all due
[10:51] respect, she's on all these shows
[10:52] plugging a book. She's assuaging and
[10:55] keeping the donors happy. It's all about
[10:58] this. Not money. This. That's an old
[11:02] joke. You know what it's about. See,
[11:05] that's why they even want to met with
[11:06] Remember I keep telling you again. They
[11:08] wanted to meet with Candace not because
[11:10] this is think Erica wants to meet with
[11:13] Candace Owens. She'd probably rather
[11:15] have a, you know, a root canal than do
[11:17] that, but she has to. And the idea was
[11:20] to tell Candace
[11:24] along. Play along.
[11:27] Let's look like we're getting along and
[11:29] you're going to walk away and you agree
[11:31] to be a good little girl, right,
[11:32] Candace? You're a good little girl.
[11:34] Uh-uh.
[11:36] Uh-uh.
[11:39] This is amazing. They act, you know,
[11:41] these people act as if journalists,
[11:42] whatever they are, and historians,
[11:44] lawyers, and investigators haven't
[11:47] always been paid to examine
[11:49] controversial events. I mean, this is
[11:50] what people do. They make money. Who
[11:54] works for free? What what are we
[11:55] missionaries? Since when does that I
[11:57] mean of of all of all organizations?
[12:00] TPUSA talking about money.
[12:05] My god, it's a it's a money printing
[12:09] machine. as if earning a living somehow
[12:11] invalidates the the act of inquiry.
[12:16] Which, by the way, is a transparent
[12:19] distraction from the fact that the
[12:21] simplest way to neutralize speculation
[12:25] is to release clear,
[12:28] verifiable information.
[12:31] And when that doesn't happen,
[12:34] people then reasonably infer that these
[12:38] institutions that we're talking about
[12:39] are protecting themselves
[12:42] rather than informing the public. And
[12:44] none of this requires any kind of
[12:46] sinister intent to understand.
[12:50] You know what I'm talking about.
[12:53] And they know you know what I'm talking
[12:56] about.
[12:57] See, these organizations instinctively
[12:59] manage liability, reputation, and
[13:01] internal cohesion. And they circle the
[13:03] wagons and they have their talking
[13:05] points. And remember, all of them own a
[13:08] lot of these conservative outlets, too,
[13:10] because their goal is to limit exposure
[13:12] and to control the messaging. And that
[13:14] instinct, that instinct as we're talking
[13:16] about right now is precisely why why
[13:19] independent oversight exists. Why
[13:22] adversarial questioning and
[13:24] cross-examination exists with us, the
[13:26] grand jury. This is why courts exist.
[13:29] This is why public records laws exist.
[13:31] This is why journalists are supposed to
[13:34] supposed to press rather than echo to
[13:38] report and not repeat. And when these
[13:40] folks with these safeguards and guard
[13:42] rails fail or are completely abandoned,
[13:45] you know what happens? You know what
[13:47] happens? Independent voices fill the
[13:48] vacuum. Not because they see chaos, but
[13:51] because unanswered questions
[13:55] demand scrutiny.
[13:58] Think of it as demanding oxygen.
[14:01] And Candace's persistence, her
[14:03] inddehaticable persistence
[14:06] has highlighted a critical truth. The
[14:08] fastest way to destroy trust is not to
[14:13] admit uncertainty or error. It's to
[14:16] pretend that certainty exists when
[14:20] nothing's there. And to attempt to shame
[14:22] those who who notice the gaps. Shame on
[14:25] you. Shame on you for pointing out the
[14:28] irregularities. There you go again.
[14:32] There you go. showing inconsistencies
[14:35] through through through uh you know
[14:38] inconsistent facts. Quit demanding
[14:40] consistency and transparency.
[14:44] This is this you know enforcement is
[14:46] what's critical. And when people are
[14:48] told that they must accept the narrative
[14:49] or the official narrative or else be
[14:51] labeled dangerous or irresponsible or
[14:53] crazy or a conspiracy theorist or
[14:55] disloyal, they recognize the fact the
[14:58] tactic immediately because
[15:01] they have lived through this before and
[15:05] the result result is always the opposite
[15:07] of what the authorities and the folks in
[15:09] charge intend. Skepticism hardens.
[15:12] [snorts]
[15:13] It's good. It's good for the soul.
[15:16] audiences fragment and institutional
[15:20] credibility collapses further. And
[15:22] that's great.
[15:24] And that erosion isn't caused by
[15:26] questions. It's caused by refusal to
[15:29] answer, which is what they're doing by
[15:32] sending out poor little Erica. Again, I
[15:34] feel sorry for her. Put her out there.
[15:35] Erica, cry. Cry. Look, look what you're
[15:38] doing to her. Look, how dare you? Can't
[15:40] you see what this woman's been through?
[15:43] Widow with her children. By the way,
[15:45] she's on five different shows pushing a
[15:48] book or whatever it is. She's on TV.
[15:51] She's answering questions, but her
[15:52] questions with Barry Weiss and CBS.
[15:55] That's it. Don't don't don't bring up
[15:58] this. Just nod. Oh,
[16:01] nod.
[16:03] This is why Candace's work matters. This
[16:05] is why this is important. And by the
[16:06] way, this goes beyond this because this
[16:07] goes everybody else who has a refusal to
[16:11] follow along and to fall in the line
[16:12] regarding other issues. This matters
[16:15] beyond any particular thing in her case.
[16:16] She is modeling
[16:18] in essence a posture that has been
[16:21] systematically discouraged by these
[16:22] people. The idea that citizens do not
[16:25] need permission to think is what we're
[16:27] talking about out here. That asking for
[16:29] clarity is not an attack. Nothing wrong
[16:32] with it. It's as American as apple pie.
[16:35] And when you demand transparency, that's
[16:37] not some kind of betrayal. That's
[16:40] loyalty. Loyalty to truth. loyalty to
[16:43] the image and the memory of Charlie and
[16:46] to support Candace. Full force, full
[16:49] guns. Okay,
[16:51] this is this is the most important
[16:52] thing. We got a lot of people in the
[16:53] media who were nothing but phonies. They
[16:56] don't really they don't really like her.
[16:57] They just to her she's just a kind of
[17:01] like the issue dour. That's all.
[17:05] They don't understand that loyalty to
[17:06] truth outweighs loyalty to any group
[17:09] organization or political party or
[17:11] candidate. any narrative or brand and
[17:13] the call to action is very simple and
[17:16] unavoidable. Do not let emotional
[17:20] pressure replace evidence. Do not let
[17:23] this
[17:25] what would you call it? This moral
[17:27] scolding
[17:28] replace documentation and evidence.
[17:30] Demand timelines. Demand records. Demand
[17:32] consistency. Demand. Demand. Demand.
[17:34] Demand. You have a right to do it.
[17:36] Support voices. All of us willing to ask
[17:39] uncomfortable questions. Support
[17:41] Candace. Support us. Support you.
[17:44] Support those of us who say we want the
[17:46] truth. And whoever exhibits the truth,
[17:48] whoever shows an inclination to follow
[17:50] the truth, we're with them. Refuse to
[17:53] surrender your common sense to anyone.
[17:56] To anyone who tells you that silence is
[17:58] virtue and obeisance and obedience, oh,
[18:01] that's wisdom. Be good. Be quiet. We're
[18:05] not going to do this. You have to
[18:06] understand this. You must forgive me.
[18:08] for a very long time now. I got involved
[18:12] in talk radio and I I I I tell you this
[18:15] so that you understand this in 1988 and
[18:17] I've been through this before. I've seen
[18:19] this
[18:21] and everything was fine. We only had you
[18:24] know a couple of stations and networks
[18:26] and you the newspaper and then the
[18:28] internet blew up and the truth seekers
[18:32] they even called us truthers especially
[18:33] after 9/11 they called us truthers. Can
[18:36] you believe that? They made fun of
[18:39] telling the truth. They called us a
[18:40] truther.
[18:42] Yeah. What's wrong with that? You and
[18:44] your truth.
[18:47] That's what set me off. 911 was was my
[18:50] red pill and everything they're saying
[18:51] to Candace. They told me and everybody
[18:53] else in the matter. And Alex Jones, who
[18:55] still is the Mac Daddy, the the potleas,
[18:57] he is number he has been involved in
[18:59] this. And we may not always agree on
[19:01] everything.
[19:03] He may like this, but not Candace on
[19:05] this. And you got a lot of characters.
[19:07] You got the Megan Kelly's and this one
[19:09] and that and there's plenty of room for
[19:11] all kinds of people. That's fine. I
[19:13] don't follow individuals. I don't follow
[19:15] I'm not a fan club. I follow the truth.
[19:18] I My only obligation is to the truth.
[19:21] That's it. And whoever says it, great.
[19:25] So stand behind Candace. Don't listen to
[19:29] this nonsense.
[19:31] There's always there's people who love
[19:33] to to drive people crazy. Look, say what
[19:38] you want about President Trump, but you
[19:40] know what he stands for.
[19:42] You know what he stands for?
[19:44] People want to hear somebody who's
[19:46] legitimate, somebody that you can
[19:48] believe, somebody who's authentic. He's
[19:51] as authentic as you can get. Sometimes
[19:54] authentic, you know, becomes a problem,
[19:57] but that's okay. I'll take that over
[19:59] phony any day. There's a lot of nice,
[20:01] polite people out there who don't do
[20:03] anything. They don't lift a finger for
[20:04] truth. My friends, I thank you. Do me
[20:07] the honor.
[20:09] The honor, by the way. Thank you for
[20:10] your incredibly great comments. I
[20:12] appreciate them so much. Like I told you
[20:14] before, I normally hang I don't I don't
[20:16] read comments because they're brutal.
[20:17] They're terrible. But these have been
[20:19] delightful. It's not about me, but it's
[20:21] about us. It's about our mission. This
[20:24] is not personal. This is about a bigger
[20:26] cause. And invite people to this. Please
[20:29] like this video. Subscribe to our
[20:31] networks. Subscribe to our family, to
[20:33] the conspiratorium, to the brothers and
[20:35] sisters, all of us who are a part of
[20:37] this royal and glorious coalition of
[20:39] truth seekers. That's all we are. That's
[20:41] it. Thank you, my friends. Thank you.
[20:44] I've got some questions for you to
[20:45] answer. Go into the comment section.
[20:46] I've got some questions for you to pick
[20:47] and select. I'm always going to be
[20:49] reading your comments. I thank you again
[20:50] for that. And now I ask you very, very
[20:52] calmly and politely and respectfully to
[20:55] comment as you see fit.
