Up Next
Charlie Kirk Destroys the Myth of Systemic Racism in America with Data and Truth
2:17
Charlie Kirk Debates Trans Activist on Gender Identity, Women's Sports, and Refusing to Lie
3:53
Charlie Kirk Debates College Student on Affirmative Action, DEI, and the Merit vs Diversity Question
8:40
Comparing Supreme Court Qualifications
A student challenged Charlie Kirk regarding his earlier comments about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's qualifications for the Supreme Court, specifically her inability to define what a woman is during confirmation hearings. The student outlined Jackson's extensive credentials: public high school education, Ivy League law school, Supreme Court clerkship, work as a public defender, service on the sentencing commission, district judge position, and court of appeals experience. In comparison, the student noted that Justice Amy Coney Barrett had served as a Supreme Court clerk and court of appeals judge, but struggled to name all five freedoms of the First Amendment during her Senate confirmation hearing.
Kirk responded by questioning the impressiveness of Ivy League credentials if obtained through affirmative action. He emphasized that Amy Coney Barrett conducted her entire confirmation hearing without any notes, relying entirely on memory, with nothing but a blank notepad in front of her. Kirk then posed a direct question: whether it's important that one of nine people determining the most significant interpretations of law knows what a woman is.
The Definition of Womanhood Debate
The conversation pivoted to a fundamental disagreement about the definition of womanhood. The student argued that the world shouldn't be viewed in black and white terms, suggesting that being a woman involves more than a simple definition. Kirk countered that society should see the world through the lens of male and female because he operates in reality, not in an abstract academic space.
When the student asked why someone shouldn't be socially welcome to identify with a gender outside the binary, Kirk compared it to racial identity. He asked if he could become black, pointing out that this would constitute blackface and masquerade. The student distinguished between race and gender as completely separate concepts, arguing that the existence of transgender identity doesn't imply the existence of transracial identity.
Circular Reasoning and Biological Reality
Kirk pressed the student to define what a woman is without using the word "woman" itself, calling out circular reasoning. The student initially defined a woman as "someone who identifies as one," which Kirk rejected as circular. When pushed further, the student offered that a woman is "a person who lives a lifestyle aligned with feminine characteristics, not necessarily chromosomes or genitals."
Kirk argued this definition reduces womanhood to a costume, suggesting it implies someone merely wearing a dress becomes a woman. He pointed out that this logic would mean a transgender woman acts like a woman all day but reverts to acting like a man at home. The student clarified that transgender individuals maintain consistent identity throughout their lives, though Kirk characterized this as persistent delusion.
Mental Condition Versus External Reality
Kirk introduced the concept of trans-species identity, asking if someone's mental condition dictates external reality. When the student acknowledged that mental conditions don't necessarily determine reality, Kirk questioned why biological men should be treated as women simply because they think they are. The student distinguished between gender and sex, arguing they're not interchangeable.
Kirk dismissed gender as a fabricated term originating in academia during the 1960s, insisting that only sex matters as it can be proven through XX and XY chromosomes. He emphasized the biological differences between men and women, including brain structure, hormonal systems, menstruation, and childbearing capacity.
The Insult to Women
Kirk expressed strong opposition to what he sees as men lecturing society that wearing makeup, a thong, and a dress makes someone a woman. He called this perspective deeply insulting to women. His core argument centered on the principle that no amount of surgery or medication changes what someone was born as, and that reality cannot be determined by willpower alone.
He acknowledged that transgender individuals genuinely believe their identity claims, comparing this to other forms of delusion where people think they're younger, taller, richer, or innocent when they're not. Kirk cited Bob Menendez as an example of someone who thinks they're innocent despite evidence to the contrary. He concluded that society's responsibility is to reject delusion and affirm reality, refusing to be governed by someone's imagination.
The exchange ended with Kirk thanking the student for engaging at a conservative event, acknowledging the difficulty of presenting opposing views in such a setting.
Video Transcript
[00:00] So my question is about what you said
[00:02] earlier about um Justice Kaji Brown's uh
[00:05] Jackson's qualifications for the Supreme
[00:07] Court and how you mentioned that uh she
[00:09] was unable to uh define what a woman is.
[00:12] And I'd like to compare that to um
[00:15] Justice Barrett. So, uh, Justice Jackson
[00:18] went to a public high school, attended
[00:19] Ivy League Law Law School, um, clerked
[00:22] for the Supreme Court, was a public
[00:24] defender, uh, served on the sentencing
[00:26] commission, was a district judge, and
[00:28] served on the court of appeals. And, um,
[00:31] as for um, Justice Barrett, she was a
[00:35] Supreme Court clerk and she also sat in
[00:38] court of appeals. And when um she was
[00:42] being questioned by the Senate during
[00:44] her confirmation, she uh was asked to
[00:47] name the freedoms of the first
[00:48] amendment, which um she struggled with.
[00:51] So my question is, what makes Justice
[00:53] Jack um Jack Jack, pardon me, uh Justice
[00:57] um Barrett more qualified than Justice
[00:59] Brown?
[01:00] First of all, what does your shirt say?
[01:01] I can't see that.
[01:02] Trump 22, 24 years in prison.
[01:05] Oh, okay. Got it. Yeah, that's got it.
[01:08] But we could talk about that in a
[01:09] second. Um I I was like like seeing
[01:10] double. I was like are you a Trump fan
[01:12] or not? Because
[01:13] yeah obviously not. Um
[01:16] yeah I mean
[01:18] how is by the way how is Katangi Brown
[01:21] Jackson's Ivy League credentials
[01:23] impressive if she got in with
[01:24] affirmative action?
[01:27] Why is that impressive?
[01:30] And by the way Amy Coney Barrett did her
[01:31] entire hearing without a shred of notes
[01:33] in front of her. You remember that? She
[01:34] had nothing but a notepad. All from
[01:36] memory. Katangi Brown Jackson. I will
[01:38] just ask you, do you think it's
[01:40] important that one of the nine people
[01:42] determining the most important
[01:44] interpretation of our laws knows what a
[01:46] woman is?
[01:52] Well,
[01:59] right. Um,
[02:02] well,
[02:04] my counter to that is that we shouldn't
[02:07] really be seeing the world in black and
[02:10] white. Um,
[02:12] and a woman is it's more than what meets
[02:16] the eye for a definition.
[02:18] No, it's not.
[02:19] No, we should see the world through male
[02:21] and female. Yeah.
[02:22] Why?
[02:27] Well, why? because I live in reality,
[02:31] not in Narnia or some sort of weird
[02:33] created academic abstract space that
[02:35] doesn't exist.
[02:37] So why shouldn't a person be socially
[02:42] welcome to identify with a gender
[02:44] outside of the binary?
[02:46] Anyone can pretend to be something
[02:47] they're not, but that doesn't make them
[02:49] the thing that they're not. Can I be
[02:51] black?
[02:52] No.
[02:53] Oh, but why can't I socially become
[02:55] black? Blackface, right? I could
[02:56] pretend, wear camouflage, masquerade as
[02:58] something that I'm not, right?
[03:00] How's that different than a trans
[03:01] person?
[03:01] Race and gender are two completely
[03:04] separate things. They have nothing to do
[03:06] with each other. And the existence of
[03:09] being transgender does not imply the
[03:11] existence of being transracial.
[03:13] So, you can you can pretend to say that
[03:16] you have ovaries when you don't, but you
[03:18] can't put makeup on to pretend to be a
[03:20] black person.
[03:21] What transgender women are claimed to
[03:23] have ovaries? Uh there's lots of men
[03:26] that pretend to have ovaries. In fact,
[03:28] the CDC guidance says right now that men
[03:30] can chest feed. Do you think men can
[03:32] chest feed?
[03:36] That's not the sole criterion for being
[03:41] So, let me ask you a question. What is a
[03:43] woman?
[03:45] A woman is
[03:48] someone who
[03:50] identifies as one. answer the question
[03:52] without saying the word woman. You can't
[03:55] say the word woman. That's that's called
[03:56] circular reasoning. It's like saying a
[03:58] tree is something that looks like a
[03:59] tree. So I'll ask again, what is a
[04:01] woman?
[04:04] A woman is a person who lives a
[04:08] lifestyle aligned with feminine
[04:10] characteristics, not necessarily your
[04:13] chromosomes or your genitals.
[04:15] So So someone who just wears a dress. So
[04:17] what you are doing is you are reducing
[04:19] womanhood to a costume.
[04:31] No. Um,
[04:33] so are you suggesting that like
[04:38] a transgender woman goes about her day
[04:42] pretending to be a woman, but then when
[04:44] she gets home she starts acting like a
[04:46] man?
[04:47] No. Delusional in every part of life. I
[04:49] understand that. That doesn't mean
[04:50] they're not delusional. Can I mean there
[04:52] there's a series of mental conditions
[04:54] where you could pretend to be a wolf.
[04:55] Can you be trans species, too? Does does
[04:58] your own mental condition dictate
[05:00] external reality? Yes or no?
[05:06] Not necessarily.
[05:08] Okay. Then why do you believe that a
[05:10] biological man can become something that
[05:12] he is not? Because he thinks it. Because
[05:17] gender is not interchangeable with sex.
[05:21] Yeah. Right. So there are zero genders.
[05:22] There are only two sexes. Gender is a
[05:24] madeup term that started in the academy
[05:25] in the 1960s. Talking about sex, which
[05:29] is the only thing that actually can be
[05:30] proven and that matters. XXXY.
[05:33] I will ask the question again. Why is it
[05:36] that a man can suddenly become a dress
[05:39] and can be treated exactly the same as a
[05:42] woman that is biologically not just
[05:44] biologically different but somebody has
[05:47] a different brain, a different hormonal
[05:49] system, menrate, have children. I'll be
[05:52] very honest with you. It is so
[05:54] unbelievably insulting to women to have
[05:57] men have to lecture
[06:00] that all it takes is some weird dude
[06:03] with testosterone can put makeup on,
[06:06] wear a thong and a dress, and he
[06:08] suddenly becomes a woman.
[06:12] Here's the essence of the issue is that
[06:14] no matter how much surgery you do, no
[06:16] matter how many drugs you take, you
[06:18] don't stop being the thing that you were
[06:20] born. You don't get to determine your
[06:23] reality by a stroke of the will.
[06:27] I don't deny for a second that the trans
[06:29] person thinks that they are. Certain
[06:31] people think that they're younger than
[06:32] they are. Some people think they're
[06:34] taller than they are. Some people think
[06:36] they're richer than they are. Some
[06:37] people think they're innocent when
[06:38] they're not. Like Bob Mendez. There's
[06:40] plenty of delusional people in this
[06:42] world. It's up for society to say no to
[06:45] the delusional and yes to reality. It is
[06:48] for us to not allow us to be reigned
[06:51] under the tyranny of somebody's
[06:53] imagination. Do you have a response and
[06:55] then we'll wrap it up.
[07:12] I'm not going to put you on the spot. I
[07:13] appreciate you being here tonight. Thank
[07:14] you so much.
[07:14] Thank you.
[07:16] All right. next question.
[07:19] And give it up for him. That's not easy
[07:21] to do at a conservative event. I
[07:22] appreciate that.
[07:28] Thank you.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.