Up Next
Charlie Kirk Challenges Self-Described Feminist on Defining Woman and the Importance of Biological Categories
0:59
Charlie Kirk Responds to Student Who Claims He's Just Doing Word Vomit and Confirmation Bias
3:37
Charlie Kirk Debates Feminist on Women's Roles, Happiness, and the Crisis of the Modern West
10:15
Related Books
Browse Conservative Books
Charlie Kirk Challenges Women on the Definition of Womanhood and Trans Ideology
Charlie Kirk engages a group of women in a thought-provoking discussion about biological definitions, gender identity, and trans ideology. The conversation explores whether biological men can become women, the ethics of affirming mental illness versus treating it, and the troubling trend of allowing minors to undergo irreversible medical procedures. The women grapple with the tension between accepting trans people as human beings while questioning whether society should affirm beliefs that contradict biological reality. Kirk draws parallels between gender dysphoria and other forms of body dysmorphia, asking why the medical establishment treats them so differently. The discussion reveals the complexity young people face when navigating religious beliefs, compassion, and truth in an increasingly confused cultural landscape.
Defining Womanhood in a Confused Culture
Charlie Kirk opens a critical conversation by asking women a deceptively simple question: What is a woman? The responses reveal the struggle young people face when trying to reconcile biological reality with contemporary gender ideology. The women offer various definitions centered on biology—uteruses, XX chromosomes, primary and secondary sexual characteristics—while acknowledging the current cultural debate over whether "woman" and "female" are synonymous terms.
One lady frames the core issue clearly: if you believe "woman" is a synonym for "female," then the definition is rooted in biological sex characteristics. However, if you believe these terms are not synonymous, then the definition expands to include trans-identified individuals who lack those biological markers. This distinction captures the fundamental disagreement shaping current debates about gender.
The Question of Trans Women and Appropriation
Kirk presses further, asking whether biological men can become women. One women refuses to deny trans women their claimed identity, stating she's not in a position to tell someone they're not a woman if that's what they say they are. Kirk challenges this position by introducing Dylan Mulvaney, a biological man who presents as a "pre-teen woman," asking directly: Is he a woman?
The women maintains her position of not denying anyone's self-identification, prompting Kirk to explore the logical boundaries of this framework. He asks whether she would affirm someone who claimed to be a different age—say, a 30-year-old who believes he's 12. The women acknowledges she would recognize this as problematic, describing it as "dumb," which opens the door to a deeper examination of why age and species are treated differently than sex and gender in contemporary discourse.
Mental Illness and the Ethics of Affirmation
Kirk draws a parallel between gender dysphoria and other forms of mental illness or body dysmorphia. If someone truly believes they're a different age, that's recognized as a mental illness—yet society doesn't affirm the delusion. Instead, we acknowledge the person exists and is suffering, but we don't pretend their false belief is reality. One women, who works in healthcare, applies this reasoning to anorexia: if an anorexic patient requested liposuction, she would never perform it because it would compromise their actual health.
This creates a crucial turning point in the conversation. Kirk asks why, if we wouldn't affirm an anorexic's distorted self-perception by removing fat, do we affirm a gender dysphoric person's distorted self-perception by removing healthy tissue? The women admits this is a compelling point she struggles to argue against. She reveals her own internal conflict, noting her religious beliefs clash with the cultural pressure to accept trans ideology without question.
The Treatment Dilemma: Brain or Body?
Kirk articulates the central medical ethics question: When it comes to trans people, why don't we treat their brain instead of their body? This question strikes at the heart of the current medical approach to gender dysphoria. Historically classified as a mental disorder in the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) under the term "gender dysphoria," the condition has been increasingly reframed not as something to be treated but as an identity to be affirmed.
The women who initially defended trans identities begins to shift her thinking. She acknowledges that if gender dysphoria is indeed a mental illness, there should be clear boundaries—especially regarding minors. She agrees that allowing someone to mutilate their genitalia before their brain has fully developed is deeply problematic. Kirk emphasizes that in California, 14-year-olds can have their breasts removed, undergo hysterectomies, and receive other irreversible medical interventions—a reality that troubles even those sympathetic to trans acceptance.
Compassion Without Compromise
The conversation distinguishes between denying trans people exist as human beings and denying that they are objectively what they claim to be. Kirk emphasizes he doesn't trivialize the suffering of people experiencing gender dysphoria. The question isn't whether these people exist or whether they're suffering—it's how we treat suffering people with truth.
One women draws a distinction between disrespecting trans people (mocking them, treating them with disdain) and refusing to affirm their claims. Just as you wouldn't mock a 30-year-old who believes he's 12, you also shouldn't mock a biological man who believes he's a woman. However, not mocking someone doesn't require affirming a false belief. Kindness and truth are not mutually exclusive.
Adult Autonomy Versus Child Protection
The women working in healthcare makes an important distinction: she would not consent to her 10-year-old son undergoing genital surgery if he claimed to be a girl. However, if that child reached adulthood and made the same request, she would accept them as her child without disowning them. This reveals a consistent position on the adult-child distinction that Kirk affirms as crucial.
Kirk notes this represents a bipartisan agreement: minors should not be subjected to irreversible medical procedures based on gender identity claims. The protection of children from premature, life-altering decisions is something people across the political spectrum should be able to support, regardless of their views on adult trans identification.
The Costume of Womanhood
Kirk and the women discuss how some trans-identified males present a caricatured, stereotypical version of womanhood that can feel insulting to actual women. Dylan Mulvaney's early videos, for example, characterized "day one of girlhood" as crying four times and going into credit card debt—reducing the female experience to emotional instability and frivolous spending.
This "cosplaying" of womanhood, as one women describes it, treats being a woman as nothing more than wearing pink, prancing around, and embodying stereotypes. The reality is that women are complex human beings created in the image of God—they fly planes, shoot guns, lead businesses, raise families, and do countless other things that have nothing to do with superficial gender performance. Reducing womanhood to a costume trivializes what it means to be female.
The Changing Standard of Medical Care
Kirk concludes by highlighting a fundamental shift in medical ethics. Traditionally, when a patient came to a doctor with a diagnosis or self-assessment, the doctor's role was to provide the best treatment based on medical science—even if that conflicted with what the patient wanted. A doctor who simply gave patients whatever they requested, regardless of medical best practice, would lose their license.
However, the new standard of care regarding gender dysphoria no longer attempts to bring someone back into biological alignment with their birth sex. Instead, the medical establishment now follows an "affirmative care" model that accepts and facilitates whatever gender journey a patient believes they're on. Especially concerning is the application of this approach to youth, whose brains are still developing and who cannot fully comprehend the lifelong consequences of irreversible medical interventions. This represents a dangerous trajectory that prioritizes ideology over evidence-based medicine and patient welfare.
Video Transcript
[00:00] what is a woman that's a good that's a
[00:03] good question
[00:05] biologically start start you go ahead is
[00:07] woman uterus cool uterus hormones are
[00:11] there other definitions of women that we
[00:13] should
[00:14] accept it this is an important this this
[00:16] actually not a silly question this is
[00:17] super it it ties the other one it ties
[00:19] in with feminism too yeah
[00:22] sure that's that's the ground that's the
[00:25] fundamental um question importance
[00:29] fundamental
[00:30] yeah important can how about this way
[00:32] anybody can chime in can someone that
[00:34] doesn't have a uterus that has wait
[00:37] should we just go around and yeah sure
[00:38] what is a woman a woman is someone with
[00:41] a uterus however a uterus doesn't always
[00:44] Define a woman because for example you
[00:46] can have your uterus surgically removed
[00:48] you're not any less of a woman because
[00:49] of that should should we have them all
[00:51] answered yeah I think so yeah and then
[00:53] if you want to respond go
[00:55] ahead yeah I believe that a woman has a
[00:58] uterus so so that would make me not a
[01:01] woman an Essence here let's let the
[01:04] girls answer go ahead no you're asking
[01:06] if gender and sex are synonyms and
[01:09] that's the big debate if you think the
[01:11] word woman is a synonym for the word
[01:13] female then you would say a woman is has
[01:15] second first primary and secondary
[01:17] sexual characteristics if you're saying
[01:19] the words woman and female are not
[01:20] synonyms then you could include like
[01:22] trans people who call themselves women
[01:24] but don't have the first or primary or
[01:25] secondary characteristics that's the
[01:27] debate
[01:28] right um anyone with a
[01:31] uterus or head I mean biologically it's
[01:35] someone that has XX
[01:38] chromosomes um yes someone with the
[01:40] uterus XX
[01:43] chromosomes yeah I think there's men in
[01:45] women there's not really anything in
[01:47] between I think you need to be born with
[01:50] uterus vagina boobs yes everything well
[01:53] interex is more common than red hair or
[01:55] green eyes it's not true but that's okay
[01:57] it's a good talk true no not even close
[01:59] but it's a good talk Point yeah what is
[02:01] it then cuz it's not zero it's it's like
[02:02] .1% but it is more it is it totally
[02:05] exists yes um no I only pick on you if
[02:08] I'm wrong about the but they do exist so
[02:10] we do have people that are that are not
[02:11] male sort of not female sort of but it's
[02:13] a deformity right so but they're not
[02:15] choosing to be trying to become of
[02:18] course not talking about so for for
[02:20] example if I was born without a leg it's
[02:22] that's absent of being two-legged it
[02:24] doesn't create a new category of
[02:26] something right so and it only
[02:29] intersects is xxy so they they're either
[02:31] more female or more male they're usually
[02:33] more female usually but sometimes they
[02:35] they cannot have both sex organs AKA
[02:37] they cannot impregnate themselves so
[02:39] there's it's Herod exactly um let me ask
[02:42] it this way does anyone believe that
[02:45] biological men can become a
[02:51] woman I think people can call themselves
[02:54] unicorns at this point in time if they
[02:56] want to so if that's what they choose to
[02:58] say that's what it is is um but becoming
[03:03] a woman is a
[03:04] very in short
[03:08] no I'm not going to deny trans people as
[03:11] woman okay so can I pause there so if
[03:16] um as as a woman you're can Womanhood
[03:20] then just be appropriated someone can
[03:22] then say I am what you are no you said
[03:25] you're not going to deny trans women
[03:27] yeah so Dylan Mulaney mhm who's a
[03:30] biological man who thinks he's a
[03:32] pre-teen woman is he a woman I feel like
[03:36] I'm just not in the position to tell him
[03:38] he's not a woman if he says if if they
[03:41] say that they are a woman I have no you
[03:44] know what I mean I'm not going to be
[03:45] like are you a woman are you a man
[03:47] that's nothing to do with me honestly
[03:49] got it so if I'm 30 if I said I was 12
[03:52] would you acknowledge that yes I would
[03:56] you would okay I would acknowledge it as
[03:58] dumb as dumb so why is it dumb for age
[04:01] but I guess your answer previously yeah
[04:03] but why is it with sex or gender we kind
[04:06] of get really cautious and saying well
[04:07] I'm not going to deny it but if I said I
[04:09] was a wolf you would laugh at me if I
[04:11] said I was a giraffe you'd laugh at me
[04:13] but with sex and gender we're like oh
[04:14] you could be whatever you
[04:15] want because it's I don't know honestly
[04:18] I've been looking at it from different
[04:21] perspectives ever since that issue kind
[04:23] of came up cuz I'm also like I said
[04:24] religious and also believe in the Bible
[04:26] so it's like really conflicting you know
[04:28] but um I feel I feel like I heard this
[04:31] one thing on it where it was saying that
[04:33] it's almost like I again I'm not saying
[04:35] this is my concrete belief but I just
[04:37] heard this which kind of made me think a
[04:38] little bit more about it and they were
[04:40] saying how it's kind of like a mental
[04:42] illness like you know how someone could
[04:44] be 30 and they could truly believe
[04:46] they're 12 like those people really
[04:48] exist it's a mental illness yes those
[04:50] people exist you don't deny them that
[04:52] they exist you don't tell them yeah
[04:54] you're 30 like what are you doing with
[04:55] your life like you acknowledge that it's
[04:56] a mental illness and you treat the
[04:59] person as
[05:00] great point so if somebody you're in
[05:02] healthcare came to you with and they
[05:04] said I'm anorexic so I think I'm fat and
[05:06] they said I want lipos suction mhm which
[05:09] means the forcible removal of fat should
[05:11] you give them that surgery of course not
[05:13] cuz I would be compromising their actual
[05:15] Health hold on but you just said that we
[05:17] basically that we have to affirm
[05:19] somebody's mental illness MH they want
[05:21] liposuction why shouldn't they get it no
[05:24] I didn't I didn't mean to affirm their
[05:26] mental illness has an accept oh you are
[05:28] 12 I'm saying we should shouldn't treat
[05:30] them as in you shouldn't go up to to the
[05:33] 12 the 30 the 30-year oldold who thinks
[05:35] he's 12 which is a thing and you
[05:36] shouldn't cuz like that's how people
[05:38] talk to trans people right they'll go up
[05:39] to them like haha you think you're a
[05:41] woman treat them with that disrespect
[05:43] and all that disdain whereas if you see
[05:46] the 30-year-old who's a 12-year-old you
[05:48] don't go up to them telling them that
[05:49] they're 30 you accept that they have a
[05:52] mental illness of course and you so
[05:55] let's apply it to the trans thing the
[05:56] 30-year-old 12-year-old and the
[05:58] liposuction thing wouldn't it make more
[06:00] sense to treat the person and say you're
[06:03] not what you think you are rather than
[06:06] affirming the lie that they think
[06:07] there's something
[06:08] else I see I because in the liposuction
[06:11] example anorexia you like no way would
[06:13] we give you forcible removal of fat if
[06:15] you're anorexic but they'll just go to
[06:17] the next Doctor Who will will they a
[06:20] doctor will not under current medical
[06:22] procedure give liposuction to anorex
[06:24] patient correct but in trans care a
[06:28] 14-year-old can get their breast removed
[06:29] if they think they're another sex if
[06:32] they think it see and that's that's
[06:34] where like it's really complicated cuz
[06:36] it's like if it is a mental illness and
[06:38] if that I'm not saying I 100% conqu
[06:40] believe this but if that's the case then
[06:42] you shouldn't there should be a line of
[06:44] marker cuz it's like you shouldn't let
[06:46] someone who wants to M mutilate their
[06:48] genitalia before their brains even
[06:49] develop I totally agree do that if if it
[06:52] is a mental illness and it is something
[06:54] that's heavily messing up their brain
[06:56] what if you're on to something so the
[06:58] question is when it comes to trans
[07:00] people why don't we trait their treat
[07:02] their brain instead of their body see I
[07:05] feel like yeah that's a good really good
[07:07] point that's a really good
[07:09] point I can't really argue against I I
[07:12] also if my even though I accept trans
[07:14] people and I do believe that transwoman
[07:16] exist I'm not going to deny them of I
[07:18] don't know you're you're you're closer
[07:20] you're just saying that I think you're
[07:21] saying that as a talking listen but if
[07:23] my daughter who is 10 years old tells me
[07:26] mom um like I want or actually let's
[07:29] make this easier if it's my son that
[07:31] tells me cuz that way he has a genitalia
[07:33] that could be cut off right if he tells
[07:35] me Mom I'm not a I'm not a boy I'm
[07:37] actually a woman mutilate my genitalia I
[07:40] wouldn't do that okay I wouldn't but so
[07:42] you but you just said but if they turned
[07:44] 18 and they asked me Mom will you
[07:47] consent to me doing this like will you
[07:49] disown me as a child or are you going to
[07:51] accept me as your child who as a woman I
[07:53] would accept them as much no you're
[07:54] you're being consistent and at least you
[07:56] acknowledge the adult child distinction
[07:57] which is super important which right now
[07:59] just so clear in California as a
[08:01] 14-year-old you can get your breast
[08:02] chopped off hysterectomy is like insane
[08:04] irreversible damage I don't believe that
[08:06] should be the case great and I total I
[08:08] think that's a bipartisan agreement um
[08:12] however it gets back to the question of
[08:13] and I don't know even know if you
[08:14] believe it but you're saying it that you
[08:16] say trans people exist trans people
[08:17] exist okay they exist as human beings
[08:20] the question is are they objectively the
[08:22] thing they say they
[08:26] are I'm not one to answer that fair
[08:28] enough does anybody have a comment on
[08:31] that they used to call it gender
[08:33] dysphoria right that's what it was in
[08:35] the dsm3 DSM 4 and then the dsm5 which
[08:37] is the diagnostic statistical manual for
[08:40] psychiatric care in the United States
[08:41] but no very you've been intellectually
[08:43] honest on that and I think it's not a
[08:45] silly question because I'm here with a
[08:48] panel of women what it means to be a
[08:51] woman is a very serious thing and it's a
[08:54] beautiful thing but it shouldn't be
[08:56] trivialized for somebody that can just
[08:58] appropriate it wear a dress and some
[08:59] makeup and all of a sudden they enter
[09:01] the club of
[09:02] Womanhood sometimes frustrating what the
[09:05] most Ardent ones think is Womanhood that
[09:07] it's just wearing pink and prancing
[09:09] around women are but is an insult to
[09:11] women it sometimes feels that way to me
[09:13] is like that's what you think a woman is
[09:15] like we we fly planes and shoot guns we
[09:17] do other stuff too uh but you're complex
[09:20] complex beings made in the image of God
[09:22] yeah it's like some weird not just a
[09:24] costume it's not like dressing for Cinco
[09:26] Deo or something right it feels like
[09:27] they're wrapping themselves up in cos
[09:29] playing Womanhood in a sometimes weird
[09:31] way yeah you brought up Dylan milany and
[09:33] in his first videos like the day one of
[09:35] Womanhood was like well I cried four
[09:37] times and like went into credit card
[09:38] debt and it's like is that what you
[09:39] think this is yes but they do because
[09:42] they think that the pro again I don't I
[09:44] don't uh sorry if I'm interrupting Brian
[09:46] but I don't trivialize that some people
[09:49] that are trans are suffering so the
[09:51] question is how do you treat suffering
[09:53] people with the truth so in a medical
[09:55] situation if somebody comes in and you
[09:58] take their diagn is what they want and
[10:00] you know that there's something better
[10:01] for them then you should lose your
[10:03] license as a doctor it doesn't matter
[10:04] what the patient wants the doctor should
[10:06] be treating them towards but the the
[10:08] issue is that the new standard of care
[10:10] is no longer to try to bring somebody
[10:12] back into biological alignment of their
[10:14] birth it's now to try to let them on
[10:17] whatever Journey they might think
[10:18] they're on and especially with youth
[10:20] that is a that's a dangerous trajectory
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.