2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk Confronts Student Defending Illegal Immigration With Crime Statistics and Economic Facts
Charlie Kirk engages in a heated debate with a college student who argues illegal immigrants strengthen the economy and commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens. The student cites statistics about farm workers, tax contributions, and crime rates, while Kirk challenges every premise. Kirk argues that illegal entry itself is a felony under federal law, that every crime committed by illegal immigrants represents a preventable tragedy, and that mass immigration depresses wages for American workers. The exchange captures the fundamental disagreement over whether America should prioritize citizens first or embrace those who enter illegally, with Kirk firmly advocating for deportation and the student pushing for a merit-based path to citizenship.
The debate begins with a student requesting to present multiple points about illegal immigration without interruption. The student launches into a series of statistics: illegal immigrants represent 50% of U.S. farm workers, fill 70% of construction jobs in states like Texas, and pay $13 billion annually in taxes, including $2 billion to Social Security they cannot claim. The student argues that deporting them would slash agricultural output by $60 billion and raise food prices by 6%.
The student continues with crime statistics, claiming that in Texas, undocumented immigrants have a 26% lower homicide conviction rate compared to native-born citizens. Nationally, the student asserts, immigrants are incarcerated at half the rate of native-born Americans. The student also raises concerns about family separation, noting that over 4.4 million U.S. citizen children have an undocumented parent, and that mass deportation would cost between $315 to $400 billion while shrinking GDP by $1.7 trillion over 10 years.
Charlie Kirk's Legal Challenge
Kirk immediately pivots to a fundamental question: What should the penalty be for breaking into America? When the student tries to discuss a merit-based system, Kirk presses the issue, insisting on a direct answer about consequences. The student initially claims illegal entry is a misdemeanor, not a felony. Kirk corrects this, citing 8 USC 1312, which classifies illegal entry as a felony in the federal criminal code, punishable by up to 5 years in prison.
Kirk makes a crucial point that dismantles the student's crime statistics argument: every illegal immigrant is, by definition, a criminal because they have broken federal law by entering the country illegally. Furthermore, he explains that illegal immigrants continue to break the law every day they remain in the country, as federal law prohibits both breaking in and harboring oneself in the United States.
The Laken Riley Question
Kirk shifts the conversation to specific victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants. He asks the student if they know the name Laken Riley. When the student admits ignorance, Kirk explains that Laken Riley was a student at the University of Georgia who was murdered by an illegal alien who had been deported five times previously but was repeatedly allowed back into the country.
When the student responds that one person doesn't represent all illegal immigrants, Kirk makes an emphatic point: every person killed by an illegal alien represents a death that should never have happened. He argues that the rate of crime is irrelevant; what matters is the absolute number. There should be zero illegal aliens in the country, and therefore zero Americans killed by people who shouldn't be here in the first place.
Beyond Crime: The Full Cost of Illegal Immigration
Kirk expands his argument beyond crime statistics to enumerate six additional problems with illegal immigration. Illegal immigrants steal social security numbers, depress wages for American workers, and are heavily involved in smuggling operations. He describes the southern border as hosting the largest slavery operation in American history, with many illegal aliens helping to facilitate the smuggling of girls, weapons, and drugs across the border.
On the economic front, Kirk challenges the notion that illegal immigration grows the economy. He points out that while major corporations may benefit, working-class Americans suffer. If you're a plumber, electrician, or welder competing against someone from Nicaragua willing to work for five dollars less per hour, your wages are depressed. Kirk notes that over the past decade, during which 30 million people have entered America, wages have actually gone down dramatically.
Immigrants vs. Settlers: Challenging the Founding Narrative
When the student invokes the common refrain that America was built by immigrants, Kirk makes an important distinction: America was founded by settlers, not immigrants. Settlers come to a barren place and build something new; immigrants come to a country already built. He cites the example of the California gold rush in the 1840s, when people came west to an unindustrialized land and built communities from scratch based on Western values.
Kirk also challenges the premise that he cares primarily about economic growth. He states emphatically: "I don't actually care as much about economic growth because we're one nation under God. We're not one nation under GDP." For Kirk, social cohesion, shared values, and cultural assimilation matter far more than economic statistics.
The Language and Culture Crisis
Kirk raises concerns about cultural fragmentation, specifically noting that a majority of people under 30 in California speak Spanish rather than English. When the student suggests simply teaching them English, Kirk responds that schools don't actually do that effectively, and proposes a better solution: don't import large numbers of people who don't speak English in the first place.
He argues that mass immigration without assimilation creates a nation of strangers rather than neighbors. When people can't communicate with each other and don't share common values, social cohesion breaks down. America is fundamentally a nation with a creed, and that creed is falling apart due to mass immigration of people who don't necessarily share or assimilate to American values.
The Priority Question: Citizens First
Kirk asks whether government should serve its citizens first and foremost. While the student agrees in principle, Kirk argues that current immigration policy violates this principle. He notes that illegal immigrants flood public schools, social services, and hospitals, creating a burden on taxpayers.
Throughout the debate, the student repeatedly cites studies showing that illegal immigrants contribute positively to society. Kirk dismisses these studies, arguing that self-evident truths and basic reasoning should take precedence. He uses the analogy of misleading statistics: just as saying "600 people die because of seat belts" is misleading when seat belts save over 100,000 lives, immigration statistics can be incomplete or misleading.
The Final Answer
When pressed repeatedly for a solution, the student advocates for a merit-based system that provides a path to citizenship for those already here illegally. Kirk's position is unequivocal: deport them all back to their country of origin and put Americans first. The American people voted for this approach, he argues, and it's the appropriate solution.
Kirk's final statement encapsulates his position: illegal immigrants take jobs from Americans, depress wages, steal social security numbers, commit crimes every day they remain in the country, flood public schools and social services, flood hospitals, and burden taxpayers. His solution: they should return to their countries of origin, work to improve those countries, and apply to become legal immigrants if they wish to live in America.
The debate reveals two fundamentally incompatible worldviews: one that prioritizes statistical measures of economic contribution and crime rates, and another that prioritizes the rule of law, national sovereignty, and the interests of American citizens above all else.
