Up Next
Candace Owens Reveals Federal Agents Blocked Surgeon Access to Charlie Kirk's Body at Hospital
1:03:09
Brandi and Billie Expose Shocking Conflicts of Interest in Charlie Kirk Investigation
1:38:44
Candace Owens Announces Pregnancy and Reveals Brian Harpole Offered Charlie Kirk's Blood to Shawn Ryan
1:01:49
Charlie Kirk Investigation Takes Explosive Turn: Examining the Microphone Theory and Fort Huachuca Meeting Alibis
Baron Coleman's investigation into Charlie Kirk's death takes a dramatic new direction as evidence emerges pointing to an exploding microphone rather than a gunshot. Analysis of video footage reveals unusual shirt movement, debris patterns, and timing inconsistencies that contradict the official narrative. The examination includes connections to Accurate Energetic Systems, contracts for miniaturized demolition charges delivered days before planning began for Kirk's Utah Valley University event, and failed alibis from alleged attendees of a September 9th meeting at Fort Huachuca. This deep dive challenges the established story and presents compelling physical evidence that demands answers.
A New Direction in the Investigation
The investigation into Charlie Kirk's death has taken an unexpected turn. What began as questions about an alleged shooting has evolved into something far more complex. New evidence, including photographs of debris in the vehicle where Kirk died, combined with advanced video analysis, suggests the possibility of an exploding microphone rather than a gunshot wound.
The catalyst for this new direction came from a photograph posted by Candace Owens showing small black specks scattered throughout the backseat of the SUV. These tiny fragments of what appears to be plastic or glass raised immediate questions about their origin and significance. When examined alongside frame-by-frame video analysis, they form part of a larger pattern that challenges the official narrative.
The Opening Statement: A Christmas Reflection
Four days before Christmas, a reflection on the meaning of the season and its connection to the current political landscape emerged. Over 2,000 years ago, a baby was born in a small village in the Middle East. Jesus lived approximately 30 to 35 years, with much of his life lived in obscurity. During his three-plus years of public life, he gathered followers who would eventually spread his message across the known world, from southern India to Spain. Eleven of his twelve closest followers were put to death for sharing his teachings.
The message of Jesus is both culturally unifying during the Christmas season and deeply exclusive in its requirements. The offer to join Jesus in heaven must be accepted. Some will hear the message and accept it. Others will hear it and reject it. The core message remains: repent from your sin, go and sin no more, change your life, and above all, accept forgiveness and the promise of eternal life from Jesus.
This Christmas season feels different. Something has changed. In years past, the political right has been the side trying to conserve some semblance of Christian identity and heritage in the United States and the Western world. If you pictured a conservative Republican a year ago, ten years ago, or twenty years ago, you could almost smell the pages of the Bible in the picture your mind produced. That reality is being challenged.
The Battle for America's Future
There is a battle underway for the heart and future of America. The old battle lines were between the conservative right-wing, largely composed of Christians, against the godless left-wing. To be a conservative thought leader in America, you almost had to profess a belief in Christ. To run for office, you had to have a picture of yourself carrying a Bible to church.
The real fight now is within the right-wing itself. This became clear at the TPUSA event where Ben Shapiro opened the conference with what was described as a hissy fit about Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. The argument is made that Shapiro and others like him despise Christians, viewing them merely as a means to their own end. They think Jesus was a fraud, assuming he was a liar or worse and that he died and rotted in his grave.
Charlie Kirk himself recognized this reality. Just two days before he died, Kirk said his donors fit all the stereotypes. He said he was left with no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause. Despite spending years pandering to people like Ben Shapiro and Josh Hammer, Charlie could never have peace. Whatever he was willing to do was never enough. He recognized this wasn't conservatism but rather a power play. He knew conservatives were being brainwashed and used to prop up the interests of donors who paid hundreds of millions of dollars propping up these figures.
The position is clear: unless and until candidates are both Christian and America first, they will not receive support. Politicians have lied about being Christian and America first in the past, but at least their lies disclosed their belief that it was important to voters. Now we're being told it doesn't matter, that we don't matter. We're being told to accept godless, Jesus-denying leadership and to submit to the demands of other countries, fight their wars, and pay their bills.
Accurate Energetic Systems and Key Dates
The investigation revisited the explosion at Accurate Energetic Systems in McEwen, Tennessee, with fresh eyes in light of new details about key dates surrounding Kirk's Utah Valley University event. According to Brian Harpole, the intense preparation for the UVU event began on August 24th, 2025. August 25th, the following Monday, saw a SAM 30000 flight traveling from Joint Base Andrews to Colorado Springs, then to Las Vegas, and back to Camp Springs.
This SAM 30000 flight is significant because it almost certainly carried the Vice President of the United States or someone at the very top of civilian or military government. The Colorado Springs civilian airport was the last destination of the SAM flight before an alleged September 9th meeting at Fort Huachuca, where Brian Harpole and others were reportedly spotted the day before Kirk's death.
Investigation into federal spending records on usaspending.gov revealed a contract with Accurate Energetic Systems described as "requirement for miniaturized extra small demolition charges and demolition charges anti-personnel extra small to support SPM." The contract was opened on May 1, 2025, with delivery required by August 25, 2025. This was a remarkably short-term contract, less than four months from signing to delivery, for $440,000.
Accurate Energetic Systems had previously been fined because one of their explosive materials, cyclonite (also known as RDX), was not properly stored and was landing on workers' skin, causing seizures. Cyclonite is extremely dangerous because it doesn't break down quickly in soil. It remains very dangerous for a very long time. If it gets on people or they breathe it in, they can experience neurological effects including seizures, organ failure, or death.
Exactly one month to the day after Kirk's death, on October 10th, Accurate Energetic Systems was destroyed in a massive explosion felt by people 60 miles away. The explosion was so massive it wiped the plant off the map. Literally nothing was left. Before and after pictures show complete devastation.
The Exploding Microphone Theory
Jon Aaron Bray, a body armor expert who developed the refurbishing program for the Army's IOTVs and OTVs, conducted detailed video analysis using an MIT process. He created a computer program that tracks pixel movement from frame to frame, color-coding pixels based on how far they move. This analysis revealed something unexpected.
When Bray first saw the video, he thought it was AI-generated because it looked so strange. Given his background in body armor, he was certain Kirk had body armor on based on how the shirt deformed. By the end of the day, however, it became obvious Kirk did not have body armor. You could see his spine in the back, his nipples in the front, and his chest hair. No body armor.
The reason everyone assumed body armor is because the shirt moved in a way that brains cannot reconcile unless the shirt was part of the equation. Even Bray, a body armor expert, believed it was body armor until it became obvious it wasn't. This led him to examine three things that moved simultaneously: the shirt in general, the portable microphone (a Rode wireless pro two attached to his shirt with a magnetic clasp), and the necklace.
The analysis revealed that the most energy came from the middle of Kirk's chest, from his sternum area, not from his neck. There was also a hot zone of movement under his right armpit. The microphone moved from one side of his body to the other at approximately a 30-degree angle. The necklace was the most energetic object of the event, moving the quickest with the most amount of energy displayed.
The Lebanese Pager Attacks Connection
Bray studied the injuries from the Israeli pager attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanon. There were two waves of attacks using two different types of devices. The first wave used pagers with alkaline batteries (similar to AAA batteries). These left black residue but didn't leave burns or char the victims, and the damage was pretty directional.
The second wave used walkie-talkies with lithium batteries. These didn't leave any charring or residue. They were pretty much clean. This was significant because it opened up the possibility of a completely clean burn from an explosion. However, this raised a question: why would someone go through the effort of using an explosive device without having a means to cover it up? If Kirk died from an exploding microphone or necklace, everyone would know it was government-related, foreign or domestic, military or intelligence.
The conclusion: they would need a patsy. If you woke up on September 10th and heard Kirk died from an exploding microphone, you'd immediately think government or military. But if you heard he got shot in the neck, while still unlikely to be a random person, it's more believable than the exploding microphone scenario.
Designed to Mimic a Chest Shot
The theory emerged that the event was designed to look like a rifle chest shot, not a neck wound. The neck wound may have been entirely incidental. A chest shot would be more believable for someone who isn't a very good marksman. The official narrative doesn't make sense because of the order of events. When watching the events unfold in slow motion frame by frame, the necklace movement, microphone movement, and shirt movement all precede the appearance of the neck wound.
With a high-velocity impact to zone two of the neck, you would have instantaneous effects: atomized blood and cavitation. There's no way you would have a 0.43-second delay from when the shirt first moves to when the neck wound appears. It's almost a whole second before blood appears out of the neck wound. This delay is the strangest part.
Forensic studies of high-velocity impacts show nothing about this made sense. There's no high-velocity blood, no blood atomization. The shirt movement suggested body armor, leading people to think the bullet hit the shirt, ricocheted up to the neck, then the wound appeared and the bullet fell out. But the sequencing doesn't work for an actual gunshot.
Physical Evidence: The Debris
Candace Owens posted a photograph showing small black specks throughout the backseat of the SUV. When zoomed in, these appear to be little specks of plastic or glass. The type of plastic visible in the floorboard would match the plastic expected from an exploded device like the Rogue wireless microphone. There's flat black plastic and glossy plastic. The glossy plastic is the actual face of the case with the battery right behind it.
An immediate charge would shatter this into millions of little pieces. The primary charge would further break the inner core of the device, which is all flat black on the inside. Given how thin that plastic is, when it breaks it would shatter into small pieces from the high-pressure wave of the explosive.
The explosive combination discussed was a 60/40 mix of RDX (cyclonite) and TNT. When combined, the blast speed is 24,000 feet per second. To put this in perspective, a 30-06 round would arrive at approximately 2,300 feet per second. If the explosive is shaped, it can reach speeds of 24,000 feet per second. If unshaped, it's upwards of 7,000 feet per second.
The Right-Angled Debris
In slow-motion analysis of the wound opening, there is a right-angled piece of material that falls out when the blood starts. The sequence shows the shirt coming up with a mark visible but no blood initially. When the shirt comes down, the blood starts pouring. This is not consistent with a rifle shot to the neck. Two side-by-side videos from different angles both show a right-angle, two-right-angle piece of something falling out with the initial blood flow. That isn't a bullet.
High-quality camera footage at 60 frames per second shows that if you advance frame by frame at the moment of impact, the necklace travels over two feet in a single frame. This is impossible from a gunshot to the neck. Nothing can cause a necklace to accelerate that quickly without its own source of speed, without something acting directly on it.
The Nipple Burn Mystery
There is evidence of a burn around Kirk's nipple that may be key to determining whether he was aware there was an operation to make it look like he got shot in the chest. Video analysis shows high energy movement below his right nipple. This raises difficult questions about Kirk's potential awareness of what was happening.
The theory suggests three potential sources of explosive force: the microphone worn on his upper chest, something near his lower right chest (where the burn appears), and possibly the necklace. While Kirk likely would not have been aware of the microphone explosion or necklace involvement, the burn on his lower right chest raises questions that could bother many people.
Challenging the Official Narrative
The official narrative has changed multiple times. Initially, Andrew Kolvet came out within days saying he talked to the surgeon and Kirk had a "Superman neck." He described titanium-plated neckbones that saved the lives of those around him, preventing what would have been a "gorefest." He provided what he claimed was a direct quote from the surgeon about how important Kirk's final act of being a hero was, calling it "a true miracle from God himself."
A few days before this analysis, TPUSA came out saying they had no idea why Kolvet said any of that. They essentially called him a liar who violated the eighth commandment. They threw him under the bus, then backed the bus up over him. In doing so, they exposed that they're making it up as they go. If Kirk had actually been shot in the neck, they would have simply stated the facts from day one: here's what happened, here's the bullet, it's matched to this gun, here's the damage it did.
They wouldn't need to make up stories about Superman neckbones or titanium bones. They wouldn't need to claim that Kirk's two inches of neck muscle stopped a 30-06 round when two elk couldn't stop the same round. The surgeon would have known within minutes if it was a frangible round. They would have x-rayed the neck and seen the pieces.
Instead, it wasn't until thousands of people conducted range tests, sending live rounds downrange repeatedly trying to find material that would stop a 30-06 from 142 yards, that the narrative changed. Every test showed that nothing stops a 30-06 from that distance. Everything tested—pork roast, beef roast, beef femurs, beef vertebrae, steel plates, concrete cinder blocks—was penetrated. After several thousand YouTube videos proved nothing could stop the round, TPUSA stopped claiming Kirk's neck stopped a 30-06.
The Fort Huachuca Meeting and Failed Alibis
Candace Owens' guest mentioned a September 9th Fort Huachuca meeting. While the truthfulness of this claim cannot be independently verified, specific people were named, which is significant. If you're going to claim you saw someone somewhere, they better have been there, or it will be easy for them to provide an alibi.
Two people were specifically named: Representative Mark Amodei from Las Vegas and Brian Harpole. Notably, the SAM 30000 flight also flew to Las Vegas, which could be coincidental. Both named individuals attempted to provide alibis, and both failed.
Representative Amodei claimed he was in Washington DC working for the district, in meetings all day. He specifically mentioned being in Washington DC taking roll call votes with his committee. However, there were two votes in the morning and he was not present for either one. He didn't vote, didn't abstain, didn't vote yes or no. When he tried to claim on social media that he was in Washington DC taking a vote, he was community-noted. The community notes confirmed he was not present.
Brian Harpole submitted a flight confirmation as his alibi. The confirmation showed a booking made on August 29th for a flight departing Dallas Fort Worth at 1:42 p.m. on September 9th. The problem is this was merely a flight confirmation, not a boarding pass. Anyone can book a flight without actually taking it. A booking confirmation is not evidence of being somewhere else. A boarding pass would at least prove presence at the airport and potentially on the flight, but a simple booking proves nothing.
Conclusion and Ongoing Investigation
The position is clear: this evidence does not require a gunshot to explain what happened. The investigation is not claiming 100% certainty about an exploding microphone, unusual necklace movement, or Kirk's potential awareness. However, when evidence reaches a threshold where something probably happened, it needs to be raised and examined publicly.
This is the same approach taken with the electrocution theory, showing hands, the ring falling off, and other anomalies. Raising issues to a certain level and presenting them for public examination is not irresponsible. The alternative—requiring 100% certainty before discussing anything—would end all investigation and prevent anyone from talking about inconsistencies in the official story.
If the requirement is 100% certainty and calling people out by name before discussion is allowed, then the investigation stops entirely. Everyone might as well accept whatever narrative is presented, whether it's "30-06 to the neck" one week or "frangible round to the neck" the next week, despite both being nonsensical.
The evidence deserves examination. The Accurate Energetic Systems explosion, the contract timing, the video analysis, the debris patterns, the failed alibis, and the changing official narrative all warrant investigation. People deserve to look at the evidence and decide for themselves what they think happened. Blood doesn't fall in right angles, yet right-angled debris clearly falls from the wound. The shirt movement, timing delays, and energy sources all contradict a simple gunshot narrative.
The investigation continues, not from a position of absolute certainty, but from a commitment to examining evidence wherever it leads, asking difficult questions, and refusing to accept explanations that defy physics, forensics, and common sense.
Video Transcript
Here we go, guys. Um, I actually got nervous tonight. I normally don't get nervous before I go on air. Tonight, I actually got a little nervous. So, I hope you'll bear with me. And I'll tell you why. It is very rare, very, very rare that I yield to the masses. Typically, I have an arc. I know I'm following the ark. And I go on the ark and I don't get off of the ark. I'm taking a quick detour off the ark. And I'm doing it for you. I'm doing it because it's that important. Um, Candace Owens had a picture she put up last week. It caused me to have a mild freakout, I think was the uh the most commonly described way I had friends and uh emailers tell me, "You had a mild freak out." I said, "Well, it wasn't mild. Um, you remember the picture? I'll pull it up in a minute if you don't." Uh, it was the picture of the plastic bits in the backseat of the the SUV. And I I looked at that picture and I thought, "Okay, this this case has taken a new turn." And then last night, well, I'll get to last night. I'll get to last night. I want to open the way I normally do. I was a little out of order last time. I'm going to do the opening statement. I'm going to move into it. Um, and I want to I want to give everybody a heads up on this opening statement real quick. Oh my gosh. A I wrote this today. Usually I'm a day or two ahead of time on the openings. I actually wrote this one today. And I wrote it on the heels of the TPUSA event. I'll call it an event. It's a debacle. It was a disaster. I wrote it on the heels of the TPUSA event. And I thought, okay, I got to say what I want to say. Some of you guys might not like what I say, but I don't care. I'm going to be who I am. You guys can join me for the ride or you can you can get off the exit. That's fine. I'm going to be who I am. I'm tired of uh I'm tired of pretending that what's happening is okay. So, with that, let me give you my 4 days before Christmas opening. OH. OH, I ALMOST FORGOT. Happy winter solstice. It happened uh about 10 o'clock this morning, central time. That's when the sun is the farthest north it will get uh on an annual basis. That's why today's the shortest. Is it north? Is that right? Yeah. That's why today's the shortest uh day of the year. But anyway, I I I'll I'll move past this. Here's your opening statement. Little over 2,000 years ago, tiny little village in the Middle East, an otherwise unremarkable event took place. A baby was born. Scholars don't agree on the precise day or even the precise year it took place, but most scholars and historians agree this particular baby was born. He lived in the area an estimated 30 to 35 years. Much of his life was lived in obscurity. We have scant details from even his most ardent supporters of anything he did before adulthood. Like much of his childhood, his activities in adulthood are also thinly recorded. During his three plus years of public life, it is unknown whether anyone actually took the time to record any of it. If they did, we don't have it. We either don't know where it is or it didn't get written down at all. He had a handful a handful of vehement followers who after he died took his message around to most of the known world. They're recorded to have made it as far away as southern India to the east and Spain to the west. 11 of the men's the man's 12 closest followers were put to death for telling others about him. As they started to die off, somebody decided they should start recording in written form what they were saying. What we managed to save from this effort is four short narratives. None of them longer than a short novella. We have a few letters written that are both shorter and less detailed when it comes to his life than those four short narratives. But it's a good thing someone thought to write down what they were teaching, and others were thoughtful enough to save it. Very few religious movements survive without a common book or set of books from which to draw inspiration. and perhaps settled disputes. Many of those writings of course became what we call the Bible. The word Bible from the Greek biblia meaning scroll or papyrus. The Bible depicts what is known of the life of Jesus. It presents his teachings and the teaching of his teachings of his closest followers as they sought to spread his message around the world. The message was simple. Jesus was born of a w a virgin woman named Mary. He lived a sinful life, a sinless life, excuse me, big error there. He lived a sinless life. He died for the sins committed by everyone else. And he rose from the dead and lives eternally with God in heaven. And here is the lynch pin, the key. We also, the rest of us, the ones who committed the sins that put him to death, we can choose to join him eternally in heaven. Most churches decorate for the Christmas season with decorations we universally recognize as signs of Christmas. We sing carols and hymns we universally recognize as the songs of Christmas. There's a mystical universal component to it. Even many atheists or otherwise non-churchgoers look forward to the Christmas season and decorate their homes and businesses with Christmas cheer. And there's the rub. Everyone loves the warm, inviting, culturally unifying Christmas season. We can practically smell the cinnamon and spice as we see images of Christmas trees trimmed with lights and ornaments. We envision gathering around warm glowing hearths with cocoa and sugar cookies. We anticipate the childlike wonder of giving and receiving gifts. And it's hard. It's particularly hard in those moments to remember that the offer to join Jesus in heaven must be accepted. And many will never accept it. As culturally unifying as the Christmas season has become, the message of the one whose birth made the season is not unifying at all. His message is exclusive. Some will hear the message and accept it. Others will hear it and reject it. The message is to repent from your sin. Go and sin no more. Change your life. And above all, accept from Jesus forgiveness and the promise of eternal life. Of course, as much as Jesus's message is for anyone, it's not for everyone. Some will hear it and accept it. Some will never hear it. Some will hear it and ignore it. Some will hear it and outright reject it. I've thought of this reality more this Christmas season than I have in my previous 45 Christmases on earth. Something feels different this year. Or at least something is different in me this year. In years past, I've noticed the political right has sort of been the side of the aisle trying to conserve some semblance of a Christian identity and Christian heritage in the United States in the Western world. If you closed your eyes, say a year ago or 10 years ago or 20 years ago, and you pictured a conservative Republican, you could almost smell the pages of the Bible in the picture your mind produced. That's not to say every single conservative Republican was a weekly churchgoer, but on average, they were. their leaders certainly proclaim to be on that topic. It's hard to put my feeling into words, but I have this lingering nagging feeling I can't ignore. In the leadup to and the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's death, there's been a concerted effort to change that reality. To that end, there's a battle underway. The battle is for the heart and future of America. The old battle lines for the future of America were between the conservative right-wing largely composed of Christians against the godless leftwing. To be a conservative thought leader in America, you almost had to profess a belief in Christ. To run for to run for office, you had to have a picture of yourself carrying a Bible in the church. We on the right still face a godless leftwing. But the real fight, the real fight for the future is within the right-wing itself. We're fighting for control of our own movement. Nowhere was this more clear than on the stage of TPUSA this weekend. But the fight extends far beyond that stage. If MAGA died with Trump asking if we're still talking about Jeffrey Epstein, then TPUSA died by allowing Ben Shapiro to open their conference by throwing a hissy fit about Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. I don't know how to say this tactfully, so I'll just say it the only way I know how to say it. Ben Shapiro despises you. He despises most of us. He thinks the Jesus we follow is a fraud. He assumes Jesus was a liar or worse and that he died and rotted in his grave. And he's not alone. I won't call them all out by name because most of them didn't take the stage this weekend, but Ben Shapiro is parting a part of a growing movement on the right that not only doesn't want to put America first, they want to put Christians anywhere else but first, such was the insanity of the entire TPUSA event. Such as the insanity of TPUSA in general these days. Why do you think Charlie Kirk said just two days before he died that his donors fit all the stereotypes? Why do you think Charlie Kirk said just two days before he died that he was left with no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause? Because despite send spending years pandering to people like Ben Shapiro and Josh Hammer who despise Christianity and despise Christians and view us as merely a means to their own end, Charlie never could have any peace. Whatever Charlie was willing to do was never enough. And he knew this wasn't conservatism. He recognized it for what it was. It was a power play. He knew conservatives were being brainwashed and used to prop up the interests of Ben Shapiro, Josh Hammer, and the donors who paid hundreds of millions of dollars propping up those two and more like them. And Charlie was done with it. And I'm done with it. And millions more like me are done with it. Because if this is the future of conservatism in America, you can count me out. I will not be led by anyone who prioritizes anyone other than Jesus Christ and who places any place other than the United States of America in a priority position. It is now a purity test for me. Unless and until candidates tell me they are both Christian and America first, I will not vote for them. Period. Politicians have lied about each in the past being Christian and and being America first. But at least their lies disclose their belief that it was important to the voters. We're now being told it doesn't matter, that we don't matter. We're being told we must accept godless, Jesus denying leadership in our interest groups and at the tops of our tickets. We're being told we must submit to the demands of other countries. We're being told we must fight their wars. We're being told we must pay their bills. And we're being told we must guarantee their survival. and I've had enough of it. Here I stand. I neither can nor will move from this position. And with that, I want to cover a few things tonight. Uh for those of you who have been around since October, uh we covered Accurate Energetic Systems, the explosion in Mchuan, Tennessee. I want to look at that again with fresh eyes in light of some details we now have that we didn't have then, including key dates in the Charlie Kirk event at UVU. I also want to look at fallout from the alleged meeting at Fort Wuka, including two alleged attendees attempt at establishing alibis. I'll let you know up front. Both failed to do so, and we'll talk about that and the consequences of that failure. Uh, finally, I want to take a look at probably the weirdest thing I've come across yet in the investigation of Charlie Kurt. It is so weird that I can't draw a conclusion based on what my eyes are telling me they see. My eyes see what they see. My brain refuses to believe it. So, I'm left with no way to reconcile the difference between my eyes and my brain. So, I'm going to turn to you guys tonight, ask you what you see. I don't even want to tell you in this opening statement what it is, lest your brain explode before we even get started. I said finally, maybe if I have time for one more, I'm going to play where the sitting vice president of the United States was called an assassin today on the stage of TPUSA's Afest if we have time. But first, the explosive new developments in the Charlie Kirk investigation. And I want to set this up by um saying this is this is not where I was planning to go tonight, but last night um Trigger had a guest, John Aaron Bray. Uh he's been on Twitter talking about the explosive mic theory. I have never gotten as many emails on one topic as I've gotten on that one. And I think part of it might be because I hinted at the importance of potentially an explosive mic when I talked about the um the debris in Candace Owen's picture. If you remember the debris in her picture, I talked about that. Um because of that, I wonder if people took that as an idea that um Oh gosh, I'm never going to be able to find it now. Here it is. I wonder if people are going to take that as a uh as an idea and run with it. But first, I let me just show you this picture real quick. This is the Candace Owens picture I'm talking about if you've not seen it. Someone gave her a picture of the back seat of a of the SUV. And when you look at this picture, she put it up. You can see all these little black flexcks down here. If you can't see it, we'll zoom in in just a second. There's all these little black flexcks back here. And she does provide a zoomed-in picture. And this is what those black flexcks look like. They're little flexcks of plastic or glass. Uh when I saw that, immediately my eyes went to sheet plastic. Plastic. Sheet plastic exploded. It looks like it. It makes perfect sense. Someone else brought something up that I want to point out, though. Do you remember Brian Harpold describing the backseat of that van? He was talking about his bag being down in between the bucket seats that they laid Charlie Clerk Kirk over. I just want to point out that doesn't exist. There are no bucket seats, but we'll we'll cover that a different day. I don't have time to cover absolutely everything that comes to my mind. But those are the black flexcks that got me started on this. So, I opened my show the other day and I lost my mind. I I mean, I absolutely lost my mind. I said, "This is it. This is the single most important development in the entire Charlie Kirk investigation." I still believe that. I absolutely still believe that, but I had to put some context to it. I had to put some context to it. I couldn't just say, "Hey, here's some broken plastic in the backseat of a car." It doesn't make sense on its own. And so, I wanted to go back and look at the Acura Energetica systems uh event because when we covered in October, we didn't have a lot of detail that we have today. If you remember uh what was it 10 days ago? Yeah, 10 days ago I covered Brian Harpole talking about his timeline of when did they start This is only going to be quick. I'm not going to sit here and watch videos of myself all night. When did they start planning the Oram Utah Utah Valley University event for Charlie Kirk? Here was Brian Harpole explaining when they started planning that. This date is going to be very, very, very important. I'm going to try to tie some disperate things together. It's going to take a lot of brain power here, so stay with me. Stay with me. Here we go. Here we go. Here we go. All right. I'm going to play uh about a minute of this. You can hear the date where the intense preparation begins. We generally uh the permitting process and all that goes on behind the scenes uh and then there's a questionnaires that are filled out that we used to there was a lot of busy work and then so you know kind of like in the military what you did we create forms that hey let's get this information upfront >> and so that we uh have a duplication process so that we can confirm it and so we started our first uh before that one um the 24th of the month prior. >> All right. The 24th of the month prior. That is when they started planning it. Well, you know, you and I and others noticed that the 25th of the month prior, so that would have been August August 24th, you and I realized that the 25th of the month prior, we had this mysterious flight from Joint Base Andrews to Colorado Springs and then Colorado Springs to Las Vegas and then back from Las Vegas to uh Camp Springs. We had this Do I need to make that larger? We had this mysterious flight and the reason it was an important flight was it was a SAM triple0 and I'm not going to draw the whole connection again but it has to do with the alleged meeting that took place at Fort Wuka. If that flight at Fort Wu that place at uh meeting at Fort Wuka didn't take place, this flight has significantly less importance. But because that that meeting at Fort Wuka the day before Charlie Kirk was assassinated has not yet been disproven. No one not a single person yet has provided a legitimate alibi for not being there. This flight still has significant relevance. And again for those of you who didn't watch that program this significant relevance was this SAM triple0ero flight. That's almost assuredly the vice president of the United States. Almost assuredly. It could be. There's an outside chance it's someone else. it's not the president. Stamp triple0ero if it's not the president is almost always the vice president. There's an outside chance it was someone else, but it's probably not. Probably not. No matter who it is, it is someone at the very tiptop of civilian government or military government here in the United States. So, we watch this. We look at the Las Vegas. We look at the Camp Springs to Colorado Springs. Okay. So, we've got the 25th in the back of our head. And I started thinking, there's got there's I know I've seen that 25th somewhere else. Yes, I did see it somewhere else. And I'm going to walk you through where else I saw it. And this is important because it could explain the story we're setting up tonight. I covered this back in October. You remember the Accurate Energetic Systems explosion in Mchuan, Tennessee? It killed 16 people instantly. It was a a military contractor who mixes up militaryra explosives and then sells them to the United States government and other foreign actors. I think other foreign actors, but they they definitely sell explosives to the federal government. And so I did what I do. I got on SAM.gov. I uh this is SAM.gov, by the way. This is the uh U excuse me, usaspending.gov. This is the way to track federal spending. Almost every federal dollar that goes to a contractor is listed through here. I slide down here and I see this description requirement for miniaturaturized extra small demolition charges and demolition charges anti-personnel extra small to support SPM. Now SPM could be a special purpose mission. Um there's a there's an SPM marine unit. Uh, I'm not sure what SPM here is, but I am sure what extra small means and I am sure what anti-personnel means. And I looked at this and I was like, "Oh, it's only $440,000." So, I open up the contract and I'll show you what that looks like. This is where the dates really start to come into play. The date of this contract was opened on May 1st, 2025 with delivery by August 25, 2025. August 25, 2025. So here you have a very shortterm contract made to June, July, excuse me, May, June, July, August. less than four months. This contract was was signed and delivered in less than four months and it was delivered on August 25, 2025. This is for again extra small anti-personnel charges. Extra small. I went searching around USA spending. I believe this is one of the only contracts I could find that described explosives. this way. One of the only I could find that expl that that described explosives that way. So, just to put it all together, we have uh Brian Harpole telling us that the planning began in earnest on August 24th. I think he might have meant August 25th because August 24th is a Sunday, but even if it was August 24th, the Sunday, that's or August 24th, the Sunday. August 25th is the Monday. On August 25th, we have a SAM triple0ero flight that goes to Colorado Springs. And that's important. That's very important because Colorado Springs, the civilian airport in Colorado Springs was the last destination of the SAM flight that went into Fort Wuka where allegedly allegedly Brian Harpole and others were spotted the day before Charlie Kirk was assassinated. So, we're putting all this together. There's a lot of brain power again that's required in all this and we're not even done yet. We're just getting going. So, so stay with me. To recap, Brian Harpole, August 24th, we start planning in earnest. That's a Sunday. August 25th. Hang on. I got I got to do this. I don't care. I don't care. Bye. Um, look, you I'm not tuning in to watch you. If you don't like what I say, go go somewhere else. And that's not me being uh arrogant or anything like that. It's just this is not an airport. You don't have to announce your departure. Just go hang up. It's not necessary. It's not necessary at all. If you want to see good information, hang around. If you don't want to see good information, go somewhere else. Turn it off. But you have August 24th is the day, the Sunday that it begins planning in earnest. you get uh August 25th, the Monday, the following Monday, you have the SAM triple0ero flight going to Colorado Springs, the civilian airport. And that civilian airport is the last airport destination before the uh September 9th meeting where Brian Harpole and allegedly the congressman from Las Vegas was there and and something else. Okay, so now we got our timeline down. So what happened at this Mchuan, Tennessee plant that even put this on our radar? Why would we even think about this place? Here is what we learned, exactly one month to the day after the Charlie Kirk uh here it is after the Charlie Kirk assassination. Uh Hickman County explosives plant. This is in Tennessee. This is about 60 mi from my house give or take as the crow flies. Hickman County Explosives Plant committed safety violations in 2019. Inspection found. So Hickman County, which is a couple counties west of here, had a a a company called Accurate Energetic Systems. Accurate Energetic Systems um produced this explosive, this extra small anti-personnel explosive that was delivered that was contracted on May 1, delivered on August 25 and then in uh Charlie Kirk dies on September 10 and by October 10, this place is toast. And when I say toast, I mean it was an explosion that was so massive it was felt by people who live near me 60 miles away. 60 miles away, people felt this explosion. It wiped the plant off the map. Nothing is left. Literally nothing's left. You look at a picture before, you look at a picture after. Nothing is left. They had previously been fined, and this is going to come up in a minute and be important. So, I'm going to go ahead and show it since I have this up. They had previously been a fi uh fined because one of the explosive materials they were using called cyclonite was not properly um not properly stored and it was landing on people's skin and it was causing them seizures. They would have this cyclonite land on their skin and it would cause them seizures. And the reason that cyclonite is so dangerous is, and I looked this up, if it gets into the soil, it doesn't break down. It It's very soil mobile, they call it. That's the word they use, soil mobile. And so, it's very important you store this stuff. It doesn't quickly break down into inert substances. It stays very dangerous for a very long time. And if it lands on people or you breathe it in, you can have neurological effects up to it, including seizures or death, organ failure. So once cyclonite is present in an area, you would not want that soil to be accessible. You might want to pave over the site, for example, if cyclonite had exploded in a given area. You wouldn't want kids at a college, for example, laying around in a courtyard that has cyclonite in it. You would want to make sure you've paved over that area or you've dug it up. So, I'm putting all this together in my head. All this is coming together in my mind and I tune in last night because I love the the uh the guy Trigger Smart. I love his show. I tune in. He's doing a great job. He's got John Aaron Bray on it. John Aaron Bray is the guy who invented the uh and and I'll show you pieces of it here in a second. He invented the uh computer program that tracked the movements of Charlie Kirk's shirt, microphone, and head and neck. And so I'm listening and listening and listening and watching and listening and I think, "Oh my gosh, I've never I' I've read his stuff. I've never heard him explain it. I think he's on to something here. I've actually talked now to John Erin Bray. I think I might have him on the program at some point in the future, but I think tonight I'll I'll just run through a little bit of his program last night with Trigger because I think I got everything I need for today out there. Uh, but as he and I spoke, we have a lot more we can share with this audience. So, I want to I want to play pieces of this. I think I have seven clips that that are between like 20 seconds and a minute. And I think it gives you a lot of background. So, I've become known as the uh electrocution guy. Let me let me correct that. I'm not the electrocution guy. I'm the guy who raised the issue on a mass level of electrocution theory potential of Charlie Kirk to hear back from the audience. I thought it had risen to the record of uh I thought it had risen, excuse me, to the um the rate that everybody needed to hear about it. In my mind, it had enough credibility that we needed to get it in front of people and start getting feedback. And I've gotten a ton. And there are some areas of the electrocution theory that I'm now rethinking and there are some that I'm doubling down on. Same thing with this exploding microphone theory. I think there's something to that and I don't think it's exclusive of the electrocution theory. So I do want to play a couple of clips of this. I want to go through and explain why it is. I think there's real merit to what John Bray is saying here. And I appreciate Trigger Smart for having him on because I learned a great deal. If you are not a fan of Trigger, go give him a follow, give him a subscribe. He's great. He's got really good material. He tries to get to the right answer on things. Obviously, we disagree some He probably disagrees with me sometimes. Whatever. People disagree with people. Uh but but John Bray opens here with giving you a little bit of an idea of how he started down this road. And the one way he started down this road was he has a background um in in military body armor. >> Get into like what what made you kind of go this route? not not super in detail, but just kind of like a high level. >> Um well, immediately I saw the video and I thought it was AI cuz it just looked so strange to me. And then um my my background is in body armor. I developed the um refurbishing program for the army for their IOTVs, OTVs. So I saw how his shirt deformed and I was certain that he had body armor on. But you know, within the end of the day, it was pretty obvious they didn't. Okay, that was a pretty important clip. It's it's an intro in Hey, oh, by the way, I have a background in body armor. So, when I But he kind of breeze past it. I want to I want to really tease this out here. Everybody assumed he was wearing body armor. If you remember, for the first little while, do you remember? Go back go back in time to midseptember. I still get people emailing me telling me, "Well, it hit his body armor." Guys, he did not have on body armor. He absolutely did not have on body armor. You could see his spine in the back. You can see his nipples in the front. You can see his chest hair. No body armor. The reason people are so married to the idea of body armor is because his shirt moved in a way that your brain cannot reconcile that his shirt was not part of the equation. That's that's why people are married to the body armor. That's why I still get emails from people saying, you know, he was wearing body armor or I think it hit his body armor. Have you considered it hit his body armor? And I just want to choke somebody, but it now makes sense because until I heard John say that even he as a body armor expert, a guy who refurbishes military body armor as a job, believed it was body armor up until it became obvious it wasn't. And so as he's evaluating this, I thought, you know what? He's really on to something here. The shirt is important. The way the shirt moved. We've all seen the way the necklace came up, but let's go back and and and hear this second clip. Again, I've tried to make these as short as possible. I don't want to steal too much of Trigger Smart's commentary because it's a really great program. I encourage everybody to go watch the whole thing. He actually has a long form version and he's clipped it down to a short form version for those with uh ADD wire. So then I was left with three different things that kind of I had to figure out to explain how they were they were obviously tied together because they moved they started movement at the same time and they kind of moved in in kind of opposite directions of each other. the shirt, you know, pulling up on his face and the magnetic clasp kind of moved opposite of each other at first and then the magnetic clasp flows back across his chest as this as the shirt relaxes. Um, and then the the necklace was what really what puzz puzzled me the most because it's the most energetic object of the event. It moved the quickest. It had the most amount of energy kind of display. >> All right, so he's he's got three things he's looking at. I don't want I just don't want you I'm pausing because I don't want it to be lost the irony that he's holding in his left hand. A Sure M SM58 microphone. That's the microphone Charlie's holding in the video on the right. A Sure SM58 microphone. So they're holding the same mic. So if you want to know what Charlie's microphone look at look like, look at John Bray at the top of the uh the threeman totem pole over there. So what this video is, I'm going to show you. I don't know if you guys have seen this video. John wrote a computer program using an MIT process. He wrote a computer program that as the pixels move from screen from from uh from uh frame to frame, it will tell you which pixels move the farthest. So it'll it'll it'll um the best John if I'm getting this wrong apologize but the best way I know how to display it is like every pixel is given an identity and then where that pixel moves it'll color it based on how far it moves. So if it doesn't move at all that the screen doesn't change colors but when it moves you'll see an energetic source coming from the t-shirt here. So I'm going to let him keep going but I'm going to stop it when you see the t-shirt move. in it and it was enough energy to actually >> boom right there. You see that? This is why we all assumed, myself included on day one, this is why we all assumed he was wearing body armor because his shirt moved as if he got shot in the chest. We instinctively know what that looks like. We've watched it on movies. We've watched it in real life. If you've been in war or anything, you know what people look like when they get shot. You don't What you don't know is um what's causing this movement because instantly within minutes we were told, "No, no, no, no, no. He was not shot. He was not at all shot in the chest. He was shot solely in the neck. nothing made contact with his chest because he wasn't wearing body armor and had he been shot in the chest, it wouldn't have deflected. It would have gone right through him. And so what he says is he had to reconcile as he as he evaluated this image, he had to reconcile that there were three things moving simultaneously. One was his shirt in general. The second thing he had to reconcile was the microphone. He had a a portable microphone, not just the Sure SM58 he was holding in his hand. He had a Rogue uh wireless pro two that was attached to his it it kind of was attached up here like this. Here, let me get rid of this for a second. I'll show you kind of what it was like. It's just a shade longer than my uh my AirPod or my earbud case here, but it was under his shirt right here and it was held. Actually, this is even better. These are my hearing aid case for those of you who don't know how deaf I am. It was on his shirt and then there was a magnet clasp holding it on, but it's way up here. See, it's way up here. The magnetic clasp is way up here. He was The wound was on this side midway through the neck. You've got obviously your Adam's apple. All this is over here. And so what he's saying is this moves. This microphone moves. It moves from over here to over here. The shirt moves up and then you have that necklace move up into his neck. Three things simultaneously moving all different directions. And you can see going back and looking at the pixelated image here, you can see where is the most of the energy coming from. It's not coming from his neck. Not coming from his neck. It's coming from the middle of his chest, from his sternum area. I will also draw your attention because I think it's important for reasons John Aaron Bray may not understand and Trigger Smart may not understand. It's important that you look at this little bitty one over here. I don't know if you can see my mouse right over here under his right armpit. You see that red hot zone there where there's a lot of stuff moving around? That's going to be important down the road. If you continue to listen to my program, Beyond Tonight, I am going to cover that spot right there and I'm going to tell you what it is. But I can't do it tonight. I can't do it tonight. So, you've got this right here under his armpit. You have this gigantic movement right here in the middle of his chest. And then you have what you can see his microphone right here, this lighter blue, zooming across his body kind of at like a 30° angle across the screen. And John looks at this and says, "I cannot reconcile what's happening here. This is irreconcilable with a single bullet entry room entry wound to the neck." Frankly, it's irreconcilable with a bullet entry wound from behind and an exit wound in the front. I'll go ahead and spill the surprise on that for those of you who think it might be. So, if it's not that, what is it? That's where he starts looking at the microphone. I'm going to go one step further and suggest it could also be something else. We'll let him discuss the microphone and then I will kind of give you my expanded thoughts. Let me pull this up. This is a big show. This is a big show. This is a big topic. So that made it plausible. And then I started to study the injuries from the pager attacks which they >> I need to tell you real quickly. I because I clipped this a little tight. The pager attacks he's talking about is he is um he's talking about the Israeli pager attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanon. And if you'll recall there was two waves of those attacks. There was the first attack wave and then I think a day or two later there's a second wave attack. And they were two different types of devices. One was, well, I got an old pager right here. It's not that old. This these old pagers where you you open them up and they have uh AAA batteries in them. You know what I'm talking about? You got a AAA You guys remember these, right? Old school pagers. Uh you can turn it on, it still works. Oh, no. It's dead. Battery's dead. But anyway, um they had AAA batteries in it. And then they have some pagers that have like the battery in your phone, a lithium ion battery. That's what he's talking about here. I'm just giving you a little. So, he's he's he's he's opening up the discussion here on whether or not this would be probable or possible even in a microphone >> were the pagers themselves were were alkaline batteries. They were round like double A style batteries. So, they left like black residue, but they didn't leave any burns and they didn't really like char the victims and it was pretty directional. the uh >> Wait, so so you're saying the the ones in Lebanon did not leave charring? >> Yeah, they what they left was the alkaline battery char was like the insides of the alkaline battery, like a black residue from the alkaline battery. The walkie-talkies that followed the day after they had lithium batteries and they didn't leave any charring or any residue. They were pretty much clean. Um, so that's where I was like, well, that's that's bizarre because immediately, you know, like everyone else, you think explosion, you think it's going to be like a of a lot of radial damage. There'll be charring and residue left. So, that opened up to the possibility that it could be a completely clean burn. Um, but then I was kind of perplexed like why would why would someone go through the effort of this and not have a means to cover it up, right? if if they killed Charlie with a a loaded microphone bomb, everyone would know who it is. So, that kind of opened up the idea that they would need a pathy. And I can't I can't say it any better than John Bray just said it. If if Charlie Kirk if you woke up to the news on September 10th and they said Charlie Kirk died from an exploding microphone or an exploding necklace, you'd have said, "Hey, wait a minute. Uh uh that's government. That's foreign or domestic government. But that's military. That's intel. That's not a gay guy living with a trans furry. He he does not do that. But if you wake up and they say, "Man, Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck. That's wild, isn't it?" Well, yeah, that that could I mean, it's still probably not, frankly, a a guy living with a transfer, but it's it's certainly more likely that it's a guy living with a transfer than the old exploding microphone trick. I don't mean to make light of it, I promise. Um, so what is it they were trying to accomplish? This is kind of gets to the point of where I think this investigation is going. I think I think what he's about to say here in 23 seconds, this is where I've been hinting that my investigation is going, he is clearly hinting he thinks that's where the investigation is going. And I want you to hear it directly from him because he's the first one to have said it on the interwebs and I want you guys to give him full credit. Uh, Trigger and John Bray did a great job in this by the way. But I put my mind in kind of the conspirators, right, that I wanted to pull this sort of event out. I would want the wound and the event to look like a rifle shot. And in my mind, immediately what I thought was it looked like a chess shot. So then I was like, what if this was designed to be a to mimic a chess shot of a 36 30? >> So let's talk about >> that's where I'm headed. That's where I'm headed. That comment is on trigger smarts, not mine. Uh, I think this was designed to look like a chess shot. I think the neck wound was entirely incidental. I think this was intended to look like a chess shot because what is more believable Tyler Robinson shot him somewhere here probably way off to the side because he's not a very good shot. May have shot him just barely gotten him under the right nipple for example right over here. Remember the wound area I was telling you about right over here? What's more likely? Tyler Robinson gets him right over here, barely clips his chest, or he hits him right in the jugular, which is more likely. I know which is more likely in my mind. Now, why doesn't the official narrative make sense? I think he does again a good job of this. So, I'm going to let him explain it. Um, why doesn't the official narrative make sense? And then I'm going to come back in just the next clip and explain more about what I mean by why I think they intended to set up a chess a chess shot >> quick because a lot of people are going to say like what what's your official explanation as to why the official narrative wouldn't work? >> Well, it's because it's the order of events. So you you when you watch the events unfold in in slow motion frame by frame, the necklace, the microphone movement and the shirt all precede the appearance of the neck wound. And with a high velocity impact the neck, the zone two of the neck particular, you would have instantaneous effects, right? You would have automized blood. You would have cavitation. There's no way that you would have it's at 043 seconds delay from when the shirt first moves to when you see the neck wound even appear. That's an important distinction and it's something that um something that again lended credibility to the body armor uh thought for a lot of people very early on because they the hits the shirt they thought oh the bullet must have hit the shirt. You see the big shirt movement and then ricochets up to the neck. Then you see the wound and then bullet falls out and now you have neck wound. Because of that delay, it's not simultaneous. It's a huge problem in the sequencing of the shirt moving and the wound appearing. Uh but I'm going to let him continue. >> And it's almost a whole second before blood appears out of the neck wound. Yeah, that's the strangest part to me is that delay. >> So then I studied uh you know the forensics of havloi impacts and there's there's so much you know um case studies on it and and examples of people being shot in the neck in the exact same area and nothing about it made sense. There's there's no high velocity blood, no blood automization. Um, and then the strangeness of the leaked autopsy reports. Like >> I'm not getting into the leaked autopsy reports because I I I think I think this is an area where he and I diverge a little bit, but I I I'm going to go back. I'm going to set up this next clip by telling you what I think I'm I'm becoming more convinced of. I'm becoming convinced he was not shot with a bullet. I'm becoming convinced he was not shot at all with a bullet. Not in the neck, not in the chest, nowhere. I am convinced that they intended to make it look like he was shot in the chest and that perhaps the wound you see on his neck was intended for his chest. And so then you would hear the bang, you would see the wound, and then he would be carded off before he knew knew what was happening. I do believe that when all the security got over him and they looked at him, they thought, "Oh my, what is this? This isn't what it's supposed to look like." You can almost see for those of you who are just I call it a rickm. You guys have rick gas. Everybody loves talking about Rick Cutler. Oh, palm gun guy. He's pulling a trigger. He's pulling on his I don't know what he was doing. He Countdown. Everybody loves Rick. I don't know. Rick must look like like a Nazi uh uh villain from a 1980s movie or something. Everybody hates Rick. I'm not so sure because when Rick rolls up on the scene, you can see him almost laugh. And when you look at it, it's almost like he rolled up and thought, "DAMN, BOYS. WHAT' YOU DO?" It's almost like he was shocked. Almost like he was shocked. Um I keep seeing people asking about the cavitation. I'll explain that in a minute. We're not quite there yet, but um I'll explain that. I don't think what you're seeing necessarily is the type of cavitation you're anticipating uh or that you would see if he got shot in the neck with a 306. Obviously, if it was a 306, he just would be missing half a neck. So, it's nonsensical to believe he was shot with a 30 odd six. I was watching uh Valhalla the other night who actually was watching somebody else and they were out there from 140 yards shooting steel plates right through uh femurs cow femurss right through uh cinder blocks right through there's no way 2 in of neck meat is stopping a 306 it's nonsensical absolutely nonsensical uh but I do want to uh roll forward this because I don't want to uh All right, here is why I mentioned all that about the neck. >> He thinks, like I do, they're making this up on the fly because they weren't expecting it. Yeah. So, this is this is the and this is Oh, you guys didn't hear any of that. Oh gosh, guys. You deserve so much better than this. My audience does not deserve this quality of production. You guys hang in here day after day. Week, two, three, four shows a week. Some weeks. You deserve someone who cares more about you than I did right there. I apologize. Let me get this back up so you can get the quality programming you deserve. Unacceptable. I'm putting myself in timeout for 29 seconds. Okay. >> I I believe that the microphone was designed to replicate a 30 off [ __ ] a 30 off six impact to the chest and there was unforeseen shrapnel that came off of the microphone. The ca either the battery or the magnetic clasp that struck his neck that they didn't prepare for. And so when the very obvious neck wound became kind of the center point of the event, they had to shift the narrative from a chest shot to a a single neck shot. And the best evidence of this is Andrew Kovette coming out within days of the shot saying, "Oh, I talked to the surgeon. Charlie's got a Superman neck." You should see the titanium plated neckbones that saved lives of those around him. Oh, it would have been a gorefest all over, but for his Superman bones. Here's a direct quote from the surgeon talking about just how important Charlie Kirk's final act of being a hero was. It was a true miracle from God himself. Heaven again, heaven above could not have predicted this. And then a few days ago, they come out and say, "I have no idea why Andrew Corvette said any of that. I have no idea why Andrew Kovette said it. He's a lying liar who lies. He has violated the eighth commandment. Thou shalt not lie. That's what they've done to poor Andrew Kovette. They picked him up and they threw him overboard. They threw him out of the bus and they backed it up and they backed the bus up. Well, in doing so, they have exposed a reality. They exposed a reality. What is the reality they exposed? They're making it up on the fly. You know what that tells me? He wasn't shot in the neck. Because if he was shot in the neck, you know what they would have said? Here's what happened. Here's what happened. He was shot in the neck. Here's the bullet. It's matched to this gun. Here's the damage it did. And the damage makes complete sense, guys, because it comes in at an angle, a 90 degree angle offset of the neck, and it passed right clean through. Or for some reason, it it it stopped. But what they wouldn't say is here's a direct quote from the surgeon about how Charlie Kirk's neck is made of steel and he's a miracle. He's like Superman. And then two and a half months later when nobody was buying the story, they come back and say, "As a matter of fact, Andrew Kovette's sh full of sugar honey iced tea. Don't believe anything he says ever again. He'll lie right to your face." Now, I I'm a believer that Andrew deserves better than that. I don't think Andrew deserves to be done like that. I really don't. I think Andrew Kovette should tell them to take the job and shove it. and he should come over to the light side and he should tell us everything we know, everything he knows. He doesn't deserve to be done that way. But that is the evidence he was not shot in the neck. Because if he was shot in the neck, you don't have to lie. If he was shot in the neck, you don't have to make up a story about how he's Superman and he's got titanium bones. You don't have to make up a story about how two elk can't stop a 306, but Charlie Kirk's 2 in of neck muscle sure did. You don't have to make any of that up. You just tell what happened the first day. You say frangible round. I mean, the surgeon would have known that within minutes. Surely they x-rayed the neck. They can see all the little pieces. No, but that's not what happened, is it? It wasn't until about a thousand people like Valhalla, like uh uh Chris Peterson, is it Peterson? Chris Peterson. Like all these people had gone out there range day bros. Everybody had got out there and just started sending live rains live rounds down range over and over and over again trying to find some material that would stop a 306 from 142 yards. And what they learned was nothing stops a 306 from 142 yards. Nothing. Everything it blows out the back of pork roast, beef roast, beef femurss, beef vertebrae, steel plates, concrete cinder blocks, nothing can stop it. And after several thousand YouTube videos of people showing that nothing stopped the 30 six, the TPUSA people had to stop telling us, "Oh, Charlie's neck stopped at 306. Take that to the bank." No, it didn't. No, it didn't at all. And we knew it from the beginning. Why? We're not liars and we're not idiots. Cuz that's how they've been treating you. They've been treating you like you're an idiot. They've been lying to you every step of the way. And as soon as we call them and say, "Wait a minute, that's not possible." They go, "Oh yeah, it wasn't really a 300 6. It was a frangible round shot through a 3006. What an actual 306 slug. So, here's the final clip I'm going to play. This is when he talks about, and the only reason I'm playing this is I'm giving him major kudos because he's the only reason we got this information out of Candace. Not that she was hiding it from us. I don't think she knew what she had. So now I'm just bringing this up because with the Candace Owens kind of dropped that bomb in one of her videos saying that there's a little specks the little black specks on the floor inside of her car. Have you seen that yet? >> Yeah. >> So the car that Charlie was in and they're saying that that might be from, you know, people are implying that might be from the explosion like pieces of the pager or of in this case of the audio um that exploded and these little tiny pieces they're seeing in the car were from that. What do you think about that? I believe >> I'm actually the one that centered the message about that. Um the um the type of plastic that you see in the floorboard too are would match the plastic you could expect from from that device. So you have flat black plastic and then you have glossy plastic. The glossy plastic is the actual face of the case which the battery is right behind that O there. So that immediate charge would basically shatter that into, you know, a million little pieces. Like I'm going to break in for just a second. If you if you've not gotten on here, you can jump in and see all these little black plastic flexcks all in through this car in here. So, um, I'm going to recommend in a sec. I'm This the very last clip I'm going to play. It's a little less than a minute left, but when we get done with it, I'm going to say go follow John Aaron Brown X. uh go like Trigger Smart's video and watch it and and subscribe to him. He's great stuff. Anyway, >> glass and then the primary charge would would further break the inner core of the um of the device which you showed earlier when the battery was kind of popped out of the device. It's all flat black on the inside of it. and the how thin that plastic is. When it would break, it would just shatter into small little pieces like that from the the the high-pressure wave of the um the explosive. Like I said, it's a Mach 7, you know, jet that's going to be coming out of that device. It's all right. And and he and I talked about this. I looked up the exact type of uh explosive combination that I think it was that explosive combination. It's a 60/40 mix of of uh of the explosive I told you about earlier, RDX, I think it's called, and TNT. When you put those two together, do you know what the blast speed is? It's 24,000 ft per second. To give you an idea how fast that is, a 300 6 round, had it happened, would have would have arrived at about uh 2300, let's say, feet per second. 24,000 feet per second. And that's if it's shaped. If it's not shaped, what happened? Stabbed myself. Look at that. Uh, that's if it's not That's if it's shaped. If it's not shaped, it's upwards of like 7,000 ft per second. It's some kind of ludicrous speed. I mean, just absolutely ludicrous speed. Now, there's one thing I'm not playing, but I want you to go to his X feed. It's John Aaron Bray. J O N Aaron Bray on X. I'm not playing it because it's just too gruesome for my audience, but he has a slow-mo of the wound opening up and coming out. And there is a right angled piece of material that falls out when the blood starts. So you guys remember there was the there was the there was the mark when the shirt came down, but there was no blood initially. shirt comes up, there's a mark, shirt comes down, then the blood starts pouring, which is not consistent with a rifle shot to the neck, but whatever. What he shows you in slow motion, he has two sideby-side videos from two different angles. Both angles show it. There is a right angle, two right angle piece of something that falls out of there with the initial blood flow. That ain't a bullet. It's not a bullet. I do not believe he was shot with a bullet. I believe it was intended to look like he got shot with a bullet. I believe it was intended to look like he got shot with a bullet in the chest. I don't believe it was intended to look like he got shot with a bullet in the neck. And I think that was a total accident. Now, I have a theory for how they intended to make it look like he got shot in the neck. I mean, in the chest with a with a rifle round. I have a theory behind that. And I've got a couple of things I have to nail down before I can release that whole theory. But I do not I I am I am one I'm 99.44% sure that he was not shot in the neck with a bullet. Now, where does this put my electrocution theory? The same. I think it was simultaneous. I think it was simultaneous. I think the it could have even been the mechanism to create the blast could have been the electrical charge through his body. I don't know the answer to that. I'm not an electrician. I'm not an electrical engineer. But I do believe he was electrocuted. And I believe he was he had a broken microphone an exploded an explosion under his shirt. Now, was it only one thing that exploded under his shirt or was it two things? Because what we have is little microphone pieces all over this van or all over this SUV. We've got little black plastic flexcks all over the place. So that's one thing we have, but we also have the physics problem of the shirt coming up from underneath. The shirt coming up from underneath and at a at a speed that is absolutely impossible from a gunshot to the neck. If you go back, and this is what I was talking about, and I want to I want to bring him on to to talk about the mechanics, but the the angle from the side. So, if you're looking at Charlie's, say uh uh 9:00, there's a there's a camera angle. It's really high quality camera angle. I played it on here many times. I could even show you the beginning of it. Um let me open it up here and I'll show you the beginning of this camera angle. It's this camera angle. It's 60 frames per second. And I'm not going to show you the gunshot, but it's 60 f or the uh the bang. It's this this video right here is 60 frames per second. Really crisp and clear. If you go one frame at a time, one frame at a time. If you advance this at the moment of the impact, if you advance it one frame at a time, his shirt travels over two feet. I mean, his uh his necklace travels over two feet. Do the math. Do the math. That's not possible. That is impossible from a gunshot to the neck. No, nothing can cause a necklace to accelerate that quickly without its own source of speed, its own something acting on it. That's the only thing I believe. Well, I'm going to leave that up. I think the necklace accelerated, the microphone accelerated, or both. Could be both. But I do believe it was intended to look like a gunshot. But I'm I'm still trying to tie down a couple of a couple of items before I explain to you how that happened. Here, this was a good question, and this is what I'm waiting on. Someone asked, "Am I ready to explain the nipple burn?" Not yet. I'm working on it. I'm working on it because the nipple burn is going to be key to whether or not, frankly, Charlie was in on it. That to me is still a live issue in my mind. Was Charlie aware there was an operation to make it look like he got shot in the chest? That to me is a live issue. And I'm not ready to tie that loose end yet. I'm not ready to tie that up. But I think the burn around his nipple is part of it. I think if you look at the the movement of the shirt, remember I told you watch that really high energy position of the front right. See if I can go back and find that. If you go back and uh can I find it that quickly? You go back and look. Yeah, right here. Go back and watch below uh his uh right nipple when they start showing the energy. You'll see what I'm talking about. And I think it's key to determining whether or not Charlie was aware of it. That's what I'm talking about right there. That little small piece right here. I think it's a live issue whether Charlie was aware of this small piece on the lower right hand side of his chest left as we're looking about it. I do not believe Charlie was aware of this gigantic piece here and I don't believe Charlie was aware of the microphone up here. I think those would have caught him by surprise. The question is whether he was aware of this one and I've got some loose ends to tie down on that and it raises a whole other set of issues that is going to really bother some people. It's going to raise a whole lot of issues that are going to really bother people. Namely, why would he be in on something like that? And and that's that that's what I've got to to come back to. That's what I got to come back to. But I'm telling you right now, this evidence tonight does not require a gunshot to to to do exactly this. Now, am I married to this? Am I saying 100% that he was exploded by an exploding microphone? No. Am I saying 100% something, you know, had caused his necklace to go up high like No. Am I saying 100% Charlie was in on it and he knew something? No. No. No. That's not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying is once I get to a certain point where I think the um the evidence becomes more likely than not that something probably happened, I raise the issue and I bring it to you. I show you the evidence. I show you the video. I show you the discussion and I let you give me feedback. That's what I did with the electrocution. That's what I did with the electrocution. I showed you his hands. I showed you the ring falling off and hanging on to his Actually, I didn't because I couldn't show you the video, but I told you about it. I told you all these things. And I raise the issues and I bring them up to a to a to a certain level. And then I say, "All right, you tell me what you think. You guys go do your research. You guys jump on John Aaron Bray's X feed and look at it. You guys go and watch the Trigger Smart video and listen to it. You guys think, do some research. Look at Accurate Energetic Systems. Why did it blow up? What kind of contracts do they have? Is that August 25th date what we think it is? Maybe. But it's it's it's it's a ludicrous position. And this is the position Candace gets put in. I get put in. Uh uh Ian gets put lots of us get put in this position where they say unless you're 100% some sure something is true you're not allowed to talk about it online and I reject that. I absolutely reject that and here's why. How are we ever going to get to 100% if we're not allowed to talk about it? That's all. Like I will raise these issues. It looks like there's some force moving his shirt. The only two things that we know of that were under his shirt were a microphone and a necklace. Just so happens that's where a lot of the force came from. There is an area where a third bit of force is coming from that the official story says there was nothing there. Everybody agrees there was a microphone right a necklace right here in the middle of the chest. And there's tremendous force coming from right in the middle of the chest. Everyone agrees there was a microphone right here. And there's tremendous force coming from right there. Not everyone agrees there's something here, but there is tremendous force coming from here as well. And I I think there might have been something there as well. That's what I'm trying to tie down. But regardless, if I have to get to the point where I'm 100% certain h something happened and I have to call people out by name before I'm even allowed to discuss something, then this investigation stops and nobody's allowed to talk about it at all. We might as well all go to the TBUSA event and say 306 to the neck. Oh, we're doing frangible round this week. Frangible round to the neck. Woohoo. Woohoo. And it's totally nonsensical. It's absolute lunacy. It doesn't happen. That's not the way the world works. We're allowed to have conversations. We're allowed to discuss these things and and see. All I'm asking is have a look at it. Have a look at it. Go look at accurate energetic systems. Go look at John Aaron Bray. Go look at Trigger Smart. Go look at the video and you tell me what you think happened. I think the most compelling is the piece of debris that I think pretty much clearly falls out of his neck. It's two right angles. Blood doesn't fall in right angles. Blood doesn't fall in right angles. All right, before we get to the next story, um I want you guys to hit the like button, subscribe to the program if you've not already. Feel free to share it with your friends. Uh we have fun in here. We have fun in here. Not everybody has as much fun as we do. We have more fun than most. Uh all right, let me set up the next uh the next topic this way. Uh Candace mentioned the September 9th Fort Wuka meeting. She had a guest on who said there was a Fort September 9th Fort Wuka meeting. I don't know if he's telling the truth or not. All we could go by is what he says, but it does seem to have uh a little bit of something there because there was a very important plane there. And he did name specific people. And that's always dangerous. If you're going to call somebody out for doing something and you say, "I saw you there." They better have been there because if not, it's going to be very easy for them to explain where they were. No, I was in Washington DC voting on bills. Oh, well then your source looks like an idiot. Oh, no. I was in Dallas, Texas with my uh with my daughter watching her play volleyball. Oh, now your source is an idiot. So, they've they've named specific people. The source has named specific people. The two people we'll talk about today is Representative Mark Amode. A M O D EI. That was one of the people he named from Las Vegas. Just so happens the SAM triple0ero flight also flew to Las Vegas. Could be a coincidence. Could be a coincidence. So, that's one person they named. And the second person they named was Brian Harpole. Brian Harpole. So if you're going to name those two people, well, they're going to have the opportunity to come back with a alibi. With an alibi. Were they able to come up with an alibi? Well, they tried. Both of them tried. I will submit to you both of them failed. And I'll show you what I mean by that. And this is the first attempt at an alibi. This is uh Representative Maram Mode. He tried to give this alibi. He says, "No, no, no. I was in Washington DC working for the district. I was in meetings all day." Well, there were two votes in the morning and he was not at either of them. And so he brings up the idea that uh no, I was in Washington DC taking roll call votes with my committee, but look, lo and behold, he was not at either one of those roll call votes. Why didn't you vote? Why didn't you abstain? Why didn't you vote yes? Why didn't you vote no? Well, you know, we're not asking for anything heroic here. We're just asking if you're working, you might as well raise your hand every now and then. All they do is say, "Uh, Mr. emo and you go I or no and then you're you're on to the next one. So that's that's number one. And he actually tried to say this and he got he got uh community noted. He tried to say, "Oh, no, no, no, no. I was at Washington DC taking a vote." No, he got community noted. The community notes voted and said, "No, you weren't there. Sorry. You're not going to play that game. We're not we're not falling for that." The second person who tried was Brian Harpole. And here's how he tried. This failed even worse. Brian Harpole submitted a plane confirmation. You can look at it here. This is at first blush. You think, "Oh, this is this is important." This is a plane flight that was booked on over here on August 29th. It's on the right hand side about three lines down at under the green. You can see my little green thumb in there, my finger. uh August 29th, 2025 is when it was booked. The flight was booked for 1:42 p.m. from Dallas Fort Worth on September 9th. The problem with that is this is not a um a boarding pass. This is a confir This is just a flight confirmation. You've got a booking. Okay. Well, I could book a flight every day for a year. If I don't get on the flight, that's not evidence I was somewhere else. Now, you show me a boarding pass on this flight. At least I know you were