Up Next

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why He Reads 100 Books a Year and Skipped College to Build Turning Point USA

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why He Reads 100 Books a Year and Skipped College to Build Turning Point USA

5:28

Charlie Kirk on Reclaiming Academia: Why Building New Institutions May Be the Only Path Forward

Charlie Kirk on Reclaiming Academia: Why Building New Institutions May Be the Only Path Forward

2:04

Charlie Kirk on Tax Loopholes, Green Energy Scams, and the Radical Political Moment Facing Young Americans

Charlie Kirk on Tax Loopholes, Green Energy Scams, and the Radical Political Moment Facing Young Americans

2:51

Related Books

View All

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why Building New Colleges Matters More Than Saving Academia Today

November 7, 2025

Charlie Kirk shares his perspective on the state of higher education and what he believes needs to happen next. Speaking at Illinois State University, Kirk explains why he thinks woke ideology has infiltrated even STEM fields, why institutions like Hillsdale College offer a model worth following, and why he's focused on building new educational institutions rather than trying to reform existing ones. He discusses the shift from classical education rooted in truth, goodness, and beauty to what he sees as a failed government education system, and offers advice for students navigating a world where AI is rapidly changing the job market.

The Infiltration of Ideology Across All Academic Disciplines

Kirk addresses a question about reclaiming academia with a stark assessment. He's not convinced it's possible in certain areas, advocating instead for building new colleges and institutions. His concern centers on what he describes as woke ideology infiltrating the social sciences, engineering, and mathematics—fields once thought immune to racial preference worldviews. Having written "The College Scam," Kirk makes clear he's not focused on saving higher education as it currently exists, though he acknowledges there remains a place for quality higher education.

Hillsdale College as a Model for Excellence

Kirk frequently visits Hillsdale College, which he calls America's greatest college. What pains him about these visits is seeing how good education could be. Sitting in on classes at Hillsdale where students study Aristotle's ethics, Augustine, and the Summa Theologica by Aquinas, he contrasts this with what he sees on most university campuses. He poses a challenge to audiences: how many have spent even a week, month, or semester thinking deeply about Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle and what they had to offer? Or discussing why Western civilization represents the greatest experiment in self-government in human history?

Education can be great, Kirk argues, when students learn classically, read the great books, and engage in dialogue and discussion. But that's not what's happening on most university campuses. Instead, students receive what he describes as a steady diet of Robin DiAngelo, Ibram X. Kendi, Jean Stefancic, introductions to critical race theory, Herbert Marcuse, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, postmodernism, and post-structuralism. While these ideas could be entertained briefly, Kirk believes building a worldview around them is a terrible idea that will burn everything around you.

Supporting Good Institutions and Building New Ones

When asked how to reclaim academia, Kirk's answer is straightforward: support the good institutions and build new ones. He sees this as the path forward rather than attempting to reform institutions he views as beyond saving.

The Failure of Government Education

Addressing questions about public school content, Kirk doesn't mince words—government education is a disaster. He advocates for a return to classical education rooted in goodness, truth, and beauty, rather than what he calls a buffet line of the worst ideas the West has to offer. He traces the current system to the Prussian school model pushed forward by John Dewey in the late 1800s and early 1900s, which views people as future bureaucrats and widgets in a machine rather than as sovereign individuals made by a divine creator with purpose.

When asked whether all school systems, even public ones, should have the foundation of a divine creator, Kirk points to the Declaration of Independence as his answer.

The Role of Educators: Gardeners or Carpenters?

In an exchange with a future history teacher at Illinois State, Kirk explores the philosophy of education. He poses a question: should educators be more like carpenters, making students into something specific, or more like gardeners, letting kids grow naturally? When the student chooses the latter, Kirk reveals where they disagree. He believes it's absolutely the role of a teacher to point students toward something—specifically toward three truth claims: the good, the true, and the beautiful.

Kirk acknowledges this is a difficult concept because it's probably not discussed at institutions like Illinois State. The prevailing view is more technical, mechanistic, and German in nature. Kirk advocates for a classical view of education, much more Athenian in character, referencing the teacher-student relationship from Socrates to Plato to Aristotle (though he humorously acknowledges getting the order wrong at first).

Teachers should challenge and elevate students toward the good, Kirk argues. A teacher should be unafraid to tell a student they're totally wrong and then guide them toward an endpoint or conclusion. If a teacher concludes that students believing whatever they want at the end is acceptable, Kirk believes the teacher hasn't done their job.

The Coming Irrelevance of Traditional Colleges

When asked about alternatives to college education—especially given that Illinois State promised to raise tuition 35% over the next five years—Kirk offers a bold prediction. In the next ten years, he believes these colleges will be completely irrelevant. AI will take away 90% of jobs, and advanced robotics will transform the world. His advice to young people is simple: find something to study and be good at that AI can't do. He acknowledges it's a short list because AI is advancing rapidly.

Education as Leading Forth Toward Wonder

Kirk elaborates on his statement that education should breed gratefulness for living in an exceptional country. He explains that "education" comes from a Latin word meaning "to lead forth," originating from Plato's allegory of the cave as told by Socrates—leading forth out of darkness into light.

There's currently a debate about what education should be. Should it be a buffet line where students are presented with options and choose for themselves? Or should it be a commitment to things that are objectively true, good, and beautiful, leading young people toward wonder—the beginning of philosophy? This sense of wonder creates an awareness that there's a world so big outside of what we currently understand, spurring the pursuit of getting closer to truth.

While Kirk prefers the second approach, he acknowledges the downside: if you have terrible teachers, they might use that authority to push Marxism. At least a buffet line would be preferable to serving the equivalent of bread lines. In the ideal classical sense, teachers who want to lead forth need to be willing to make absolute, objective claims in three categories: ethics, metaphysics, and politics (meaning political systems, not parties).

The Classical Model and Character Formation

Kirk notes that proper classical education isn't about imposing ideas—it's about teaching the fundamentals of Greek, Latin, and Hebrew, reading ancient and great books, and moving toward the goal of creating better citizens. A properly educated person is magnanimous, possessing character. The word "character" comes from Greek, meaning imprint or tattoo—something etched within you.

A properly formed person with character is like the Grand Canyon, Kirk explains. You're impressed when you look at it, and no matter how much rain, storm, or opposition comes, it stays in place. That's what education should create. In contrast, current education is like a plate of spaghetti—it changes as you want it to, with no form.

Objective Truth and the Founders

In a final exchange about objective morality and concerns about whitewashing history, Kirk clarifies his position. He would never support whitewashing anything. He believes that if you fairly read the founders as they are, you'll realize they were incredible men born into a world they didn't create. By the time they were exiting the world, slavery was on its way out. The first anti-slavery convention was hosted by Benjamin Franklin in Philadelphia in 1775.

Kirk argues that a proper view of history using original texts, actual quotes, and the actual context of the time creates a sense of pride and gratitude for living in this nation. He maintains there is an objective ethical code—a proper way to treat people less powerful than us, a proper way to organize society, and a highest form of existence for human beings. He points to the Bible as the greatest roadmap, with Aristotle's Ethics offering another guide that should be taught—exploring what a properly formed person looks like through concepts like courage, contemplation, justice, and friendship.

If there's no such thing as objective morality, Kirk concludes, then society becomes nothing more than a power dynamic—something he believes some people in control of the country actually embrace.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:00] How do we start to take academia back?

[00:03] What is the best route to achieve that?

[00:05] >> Well, I'm not convinced it's possible in

[00:07] certain areas. I think we have to build

[00:09] new colleges and new institutions. My my

[00:12] big fear is that this woke ideology is

[00:14] now infiltrating the social sciences.

[00:17] It's also infiltrating engineering and

[00:20] mathematics. The things that you thought

[00:21] would be immune to the kind of racial

[00:24] preference, you know, worldview is now

[00:26] totally and completely infiltrated. And

[00:28] so I wrote a whole book called The

[00:29] College Scam. So I'm not exactly big on

[00:32] saving higher education, but I do think

[00:35] there is a place for higher education.

[00:37] And it pains me because I go and I visit

[00:40] to Hillsdale College quite often.

[00:42] Hillsdale College is America's greatest

[00:43] college, by the way. They do a fabulous

[00:45] job. And it pains me because I see how

[00:48] good education could be. I I sit on

[00:51] these classes at Hillsdale College and

[00:52] they're studying Aristotle's ethics.

[00:54] They're studying, you know, Augustine.

[00:57] They're studying the Suma Theologica by

[00:58] Aquinus. Now, I would just venture a

[01:00] guess that many of you have probably not

[01:02] spent more than maybe a week or a month

[01:05] or a semester thinking about Socrates,

[01:07] Plato, and Aristotle, what they had to

[01:09] offer. If you guys are, then I'll stand

[01:11] corrected on that. Or talking about why

[01:13] Western civilization is the greatest and

[01:15] most excellent experiment in

[01:17] self-government in human history. Why is

[01:19] that the case? Right? And so, education

[01:22] can be great. the pro and there is a

[01:24] place for students to learn classically

[01:26] and read the great books and to have

[01:28] dialogue and discussion. That's not

[01:30] what's happening on university campuses.

[01:32] Instead, you get a steady diet of Robin

[01:34] D'Angelo and Ibram X Kendi and of Jean

[01:38] Stfanic and of intro to critical race

[01:41] theory and Herbert Marcusa and Michelle

[01:43] Fuko and Jacqu Dereda and postmodernism

[01:46] and post structuralism that really these

[01:49] ideas could be entertained for a short

[01:51] while. It's a really bad idea to build a

[01:53] worldview around them. In fact, it's a

[01:55] great way to burn everything around you

[01:57] if you actually do that. So, how do we

[01:59] reclaim it? I think it's time to support

[02:01] the good institutions and build new

[02:02] ones.

[02:03] >> What do you think do you think the

[02:04] content being teached predominantly in

[02:07] public schools is wrong? And then what

[02:08] core concepts do you think should be

[02:10] including moral values should be taught?

[02:13] >> Yeah. Uh government education is a

[02:15] disaster. Um it's so we should go back

[02:18] to a classical form of education which

[02:20] is rooted in goodness, truth and beauty,

[02:22] not just in a buffet line of all the

[02:24] worst ideas that the west has to offer.

[02:26] Um our government the government schools

[02:28] are very industrialbased that's a

[02:30] Prussian school model uh that was pushed

[02:32] forward by John Dwey in the late 1800s

[02:34] and early 1900s. Um which is very much

[02:37] about looking at people as future

[02:38] bureaucrats and widgets in a machine not

[02:41] as sovereign individuals that was made

[02:43] by a divine creator with a purpose. So

[02:45] there's a lot wrong with the government

[02:46] education system. Um but yeah, I would I

[02:48] would go back and um to the books that

[02:50] are being taught, to the ideas that are

[02:52] being espoused. Um the government

[02:54] education system is a complete and

[02:55] abject moral failure.

[02:57] >> And you mentioned how no longer are they

[02:59] being taught on the basis of a divine

[03:00] creator. Do you think all school

[03:02] systems, even public, should have that

[03:04] underlying foundation?

[03:05] >> Yeah, I mean it's in the declaration.

[03:07] >> Okay. Thank you.

[03:08] >> Good afternoon, Mr. Kirk. Um first off,

[03:10] thank you for coming to Illinois State.

[03:12] Um, I had a couple questions, uh, in the

[03:15] spirit of being at Illinois State,

[03:17] school known for its education. Um, you

[03:19] already touched on some things about the

[03:21] role of college moving forward in

[03:23] regards to AI, STEM. Uh, what about the

[03:26] role of an educator, someone who like

[03:28] myself who's trying to teach secondary

[03:30] education in high school?

[03:32] >> It's a great question. Um, you know, I

[03:35] will do this. I have a very strong

[03:37] opinion of what education is.

[03:39] >> Are you studying to become a teacher? uh

[03:41] history education teacher.

[03:42] >> Awesome. Good for you. Why don't you

[03:43] tell me what education is and it's ideal

[03:47] in practice?

[03:48] >> So So I think that's that's two things.

[03:50] A little bit closer. Yeah. So I think

[03:52] that's two things in regards to

[03:54] traditional college. What it's normally

[03:56] been is the burden of proof. Whether

[03:57] you're taking a math class or you're

[03:58] taking a history class, it's all about

[03:59] providing evidence uh to support an

[04:02] answer, right? Um identifying the

[04:04] difference between speculation and

[04:06] evidence. Um, so there's the issue of

[04:09] burden of proof, which again that might

[04:12] change with AI and new technologies. In

[04:14] regards to a high school student, I

[04:17] myself as a history teacher, the first

[04:20] question that I should ask myself is, am

[04:22] I some am I someone worth learning from?

[04:24] Um, I think we already have this

[04:25] pipeline of high school to college back

[04:28] to high school and some really competent

[04:31] teachers are probably capable of

[04:32] teaching students with that amount of

[04:34] experience. I don't think that is common

[04:36] probably for for everyone. Um, and I

[04:39] enjoy having life experience outside of

[04:42] that. Outside of that, uh, the role of

[04:44] educators to develop competent and

[04:46] capable students.

[04:48] >> Great. I I I don't disagree with that. I

[04:50] think there's another thing to that.

[04:54] Do you think educators should be more

[04:56] like carpenters, meaning they're making

[04:58] students into something, or more like

[05:00] gardeners, letting kids grow?

[05:02] >> The role of an apprentice,

[05:03] >> right? So, not even just metaphorically

[05:06] like do you think that it's your job to

[05:08] turn a like a student into a specific

[05:10] thing or to let or let kids grow into

[05:13] what they naturally are?

[05:15] >> Uh the latter

[05:16] >> grow into what they naturally

[05:17] >> the latter and also support um that

[05:20] growth where it can't be supported.

[05:22] >> Um do you do you think it's your role as

[05:25] a teacher to point them towards a

[05:28] certain conclusion? Um, no. But I think

[05:31] it's my job to help them identify like

[05:33] it burden of proof, right? Identify the

[05:36] difference between

[05:37] >> that's where we disagree. I think of

[05:38] course it's the role of a teacher to

[05:40] point towards something.

[05:41] >> Okay.

[05:41] >> And that's fine. We're just going to

[05:42] disagree. We believe as conservatives

[05:46] generally that you should have you have

[05:48] three truth claims. The good, the true,

[05:49] and the beautiful. Yeah.

[05:50] >> And you should try to point a child

[05:52] towards those things. You should try to

[05:54] read things that enrich and nourish

[05:56] their soul and their being towards an

[05:59] appreciation of the elevated things.

[06:02] >> Yeah,

[06:03] >> it's a difficult concept because none of

[06:05] that is probably talked about here at

[06:06] Illinois State, right? It's probably

[06:08] it's much more te technical and you know

[06:10] mechanistic and a German view of

[06:14] education.

[06:14] >> Exactly. It's normal named after the

[06:16] German.

[06:16] >> Yeah, exactly. Where we have a classical

[06:18] view of education much more Athenian in

[06:21] nature. Yeah. where we want

[06:22] >> Alexander the Great to Aristotle.

[06:23] Aristotle to Plato,

[06:25] >> that apprentice student.

[06:26] >> Actually, it was Socrates Plato.

[06:28] Aristotle, but that's fine. That's okay.

[06:29] Yeah, that's

[06:30] >> Look, I've already taken a couple L's

[06:31] this week. Jeez, what happened?

[06:34] >> Sparring.

[06:35] >> Yeah, Spart Spar heavyweight. But

[06:36] >> Awesome. Good. Um, and that's fine. It's

[06:38] not a matter of disagreement. We think

[06:40] the teacher should challenge and elevate

[06:43] the student towards the good

[06:45] >> and that a teacher should be unafraid to

[06:48] tell a student, you're totally wrong.

[06:50] >> Yeah. 100%. and then point them and try

[06:52] to get them to naturally get towards an

[06:54] end point or a certain conclusion. If

[06:56] for example, if a teacher has, you know,

[07:00] if they come to the conclusion, well, if

[07:02] my students believe whatever they want

[07:03] to believe at the end of this, it is

[07:04] what it is.

[07:05] >> We don't think that we don't think the

[07:07] teacher's done their job.

[07:08] >> 100%.

[07:09] >> That makes sense. So, thank you very

[07:10] much.

[07:11] >> Thanks, man. Have a great day.

[07:12] >> College enrollment rate has been

[07:13] dropping every single year for the past

[07:15] few years. uh education feels much less

[07:18] regulated, not up to-date and uh pretty

[07:21] not advanced anymore. What do you

[07:22] recommend if you want to get educated

[07:24] but don't think a college education is

[07:26] the best way?

[07:26] >> It's a good question. It depends on what

[07:28] you want to do, right? It depends on

[07:30] what you want to actually, you know,

[07:32] >> for example, this sorry to interrupt,

[07:34] but this college here has uh promised to

[07:36] raise their tuition 35% over the next 5

[07:38] years.

[07:39] >> 7%.

[07:40] >> It's just it's incredible. I'm going to

[07:41] be honest, in the next 10 years, we're

[07:43] not there yet. These in These colleges

[07:46] are going to be completely irrelevant.

[07:47] AI is going to take away 90% of the jobs

[07:50] and advanced robotics is going to

[07:51] basically take over the world as we know

[07:53] it. So find something to study and be

[07:57] good at that AI can't do.

[07:59] >> That's the best piece of advice I have

[08:01] for young people. Find something to be

[08:02] good at that AI cannot do.

[08:04] >> It's a short list, by the way, cuz AI is

[08:06] getting pretty advanced as you well

[08:07] know. Thank you. Appreciate it. If I

[08:09] remember correctly, you said something

[08:10] along the lines of the purpose of

[08:12] education should be to kind of breed

[08:15] gratefulness for being in a an awesome

[08:17] amazing country. Uh could you elaborate

[08:19] on that?

[08:19] >> Yeah, that's a great question and thank

[08:21] you for asking it. So education comes

[08:23] from a Latin word which means to lead

[08:25] forth. It literally comes out of

[08:27] Socrates allegory of the cave. Well,

[08:29] Plato's allegory of the cave of as told

[08:31] by Socrates of leading forth out of

[08:33] darkness into into light. So there's

[08:36] this debate right now of what is

[08:37] education, right? Should education be

[08:40] kind of a buffet line where you present

[08:42] students with all the different options

[08:43] they kind of choose for themselves or

[08:45] should education be hopefully a

[08:48] commitment to things that are

[08:49] objectively true and good and beautiful

[08:51] and leading young people towards what is

[08:53] the beginning of philosophy, which is

[08:56] wonder. like wow there's a world so big

[08:58] outside of things that I'm just

[09:00] beginning to understand and I know so

[09:02] little of it but I want to go in the

[09:03] pursuit and the journey of maybe getting

[09:05] closer to it so those are two different

[09:07] types of definitions right so one form

[09:09] of an educational definition is you know

[09:11] what we are going to try to sample every

[09:13] single ideology and kids and students

[09:15] choose for themselves I think that's a

[09:17] mistake now the downside is if you get

[09:20] really really bad teachers all of a

[09:21] sudden they're going to use that and

[09:22] they're going to be like oh well we know

[09:23] Marxism is better than that so at least

[09:25] we'd prefer the buffet line over serving

[09:27] you know bread lines of the equivalent

[09:28] of Marxism. Whereas in its ideal though

[09:31] in the classical sense people that are

[09:34] teachers people that want to lead forth

[09:36] they need to be willing to make absolute

[09:39] objective claims in three categories in

[09:41] ethics in metaphysics and in politics.

[09:44] That's not political parties but in

[09:46] certain political systems. And so the

[09:48] the correct and the ideal view of

[09:50] education should be that is it? It's so

[09:52] far from that it's hard to believe.

[09:53] Anyone here classically educated? You

[09:55] kind of know what I believe here. Yeah.

[09:56] And you would know that it's not

[09:58] actually imposing those ideas. It's

[10:00] teaching the fundamentals of Greek, of

[10:02] Latin and Hebrew, read reading ancient

[10:05] and great books and getting closer

[10:06] towards that hopeful end conclusion of a

[10:09] better citizen. And so people say,

[10:10] Charlie, what does a a a properly

[10:12] educated man look like, a magnanimous

[10:15] man, someone that has character? Now,

[10:18] character comes from a Greek word which

[10:20] means imprint or tattoo. It's it's

[10:23] etched within you. A properly sold man

[10:26] with character is like the Grand Canyon

[10:29] where good luck undoing that.

[10:33] Good luck trying to change that. That's

[10:35] what education should be. A properly

[10:37] sold man is like the Grand Canyon. Look

[10:39] at it, you're impressed. No matter how

[10:41] much rain, storm, or opposition happens,

[10:44] that stays in put. In fact, education is

[10:48] like the opposite of it. It's like a

[10:49] plate of spaghetti. It changes as you

[10:51] want to. there's no form of it.

[10:52] >> I do agree with some of the things you

[10:53] said about education should be about

[10:56] objective truth and things like that.

[10:58] Although I don't think necessarily

[10:59] ethics has like an objective morality to

[11:02] it all the time. But I just the root of

[11:05] your argu argument with Vos was kind of

[11:07] he was saying how you were arguing that

[11:10] >> the purpose of school shouldn't to be to

[11:13] breed like many activists.

[11:15] >> That is true. So from that I kind of get

[11:16] the idea of a whitewashing history a

[11:18] little bit in order to not like breed

[11:21] activism when in reality I don't think

[11:23] education should like ascribe morality

[11:26] to our country. It should kind of just

[11:27] be like like you said objective truth

[11:30] history and then they kind of will make

[11:33] out of it what they got.

[11:34] >> Yeah. So I would never support

[11:37] whitewashing anything. Obviously, I

[11:38] think that if you fairly and readly, you

[11:40] know, read the founders as they are,

[11:42] you'll realize these were incredible

[11:44] men. That they were born into a world

[11:46] that they did not create, that by the

[11:49] time that they were exiting the world,

[11:51] slavery was on its way out, that the

[11:52] first ever anti-slavery convention was

[11:54] hosted by Benjamin Franklin in

[11:56] Philadelphia in 1775. I could go on and

[11:58] on and on, but I think a proper view of

[12:00] history using original texts, actual

[12:02] quotes, and going into the actual

[12:04] context of the time, I think actually

[12:07] creates a sense of pride and a sense of

[12:09] gratitude for living in that nation. So,

[12:12] happy to dive into that further. I don't

[12:13] think we're going to explore that, you

[12:14] know, much more because I know we're low

[12:15] on time. But I'll say this final thing

[12:18] is that this is where we'll have

[12:19] clarity, but not agreement on this one

[12:21] issue. I believe there is an objective

[12:23] ethical code. I I believe that there is

[12:26] an objective ethical code of how we

[12:27] treat people that are less powerful than

[12:29] us of a proper way to organize society

[12:32] of what the highest form of existence

[12:35] for a human being should be. I think one

[12:37] of the great road maps in addition to

[12:39] the Bible which is the greatest road map

[12:40] but one of the road maps that isn't

[12:42] taught Aristotle's ethics of what does a

[12:44] properly sold man look like courage

[12:46] contemplation justice friendship all

[12:48] these things that need to be wrestled

[12:50] with and asked the question about I

[12:52] think that if we say that there's no

[12:54] such thing as objective morality then

[12:55] we're in nothing more than a power

[12:56] dynamic which some people in control of

[12:58] our country actually believe. But thank

[13:00] you so much for being here tonight.

[13:01] Appreciation.

Link copied to clipboard!