Charlie Kirk Reveals Why Twenty-Year-Old White Men Are More Right-Wing Than Seventy-Five-Year-Olds

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Releases Full Conversation With Gavin Newsom From California Viral Debate on Trans Athletes and Wokeism

Charlie Kirk Releases Full Conversation With Gavin Newsom From California Viral Debate on Trans Athletes and Wokeism

1:22:50

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Turning Point USA Beat Billionaire Democrats at Their Own Game

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Turning Point USA Beat Billionaire Democrats at Their Own Game

10:28

Matt Gaetz Exposes How Congress Really Works: Lobbyists Write Scripts While Members Just Play Actors

Matt Gaetz Exposes How Congress Really Works: Lobbyists Write Scripts While Members Just Play Actors

36:59

Charlie Kirk banner
2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018

Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why Twenty-Year-Old White Men Are More Right-Wing Than Seventy-Five-Year-Olds

Charlie Kirk examines a striking new study showing that twenty-year-old white men are now more right-wing than seventy-five-year-old white men, challenging the traditional narrative about Republican demographics. Kirk explores the growing political divide between young men gravitating toward conservative principles of duty and responsibility, while college-educated women increasingly embrace progressive ideology. He analyzes viral campus confrontations, discusses the psychological underpinnings of this generational shift, and reveals why the Democratic Party's approval rating has reached an unprecedented low of minus twenty-eight points. Kirk argues that the contrast between masculine self-help emphasizing obligation and feminine self-help promoting entitlement reflects a deeper cultural battle shaping American politics.

March 22, 2025

The Generational Shift in Conservative Politics

A remarkable new study reveals that twenty-year-old white men are more right-wing than seventy-five-year-old white men, fundamentally challenging the traditional narrative that the Republican Party consists primarily of elderly white men. This demographic shift represents a sign of hope for conservatives, showing that the Republican Party now encompasses young and old white men, along with growing numbers of blacks and Hispanics.

This transformation shouldn't anger older conservatives but should instead be celebrated as evidence of the movement's expanding appeal across age groups. The data demonstrates that conservatism is attracting younger generations in ways that defy conventional political wisdom.

The College-Educated Women Problem

While the Republican Party gains ground with various demographics, one group presents a significant challenge: college-educated women. This demographic represents a major issue that defies simple explanation. The data reveals a chilling reality about how deeply progressive ideology has taken root among this specific population.

Steve Kornacki's analysis shows that white women with at least a college degree are the only group of white voters truly aligned with progressive Democratic politics. When asked about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs, white men without degrees, white men with degrees, and white women without degrees all support ending these programs, some by double digits. However, white women with college degrees completely diverge, supporting the continuation of DEI programs by a nearly forty-point margin.

A Viral Campus Confrontation Reveals Deeper Issues

A viral video from the University of Tennessee illustrates the philosophical divide in America. While the immediate topic concerns abortion, the exchange reveals something more profound about how different groups process information and responsibility.

In the confrontation, a young woman argues that pregnancy would ruin her collegiate life and force her to drop out of college. When challenged about taking responsibility for her actions, she responds with incredulity, seemingly unable to accept that her choices might have consequences. The exchange highlights a worldview centered on personal desire rather than duty or obligation.

The video demonstrates not just a disagreement about abortion, but a fundamental difference in how young men and women are approaching life decisions. Young men increasingly gravitate toward conservatism because it emphasizes responsibility, order, duty, and reason. Young women, by contrast, are gravitating toward the Democrat Party because many embrace a worldview that prioritizes personal license over obligation.

The Self-Help Book Revelation

The difference between male and female political orientation can be observed in the self-help book market. Male self-help books use words like must, ought, and should, telling men they need to take action, get off their tail, and be better. These books emphasize duty and obligation.

Female self-help books, by contrast, focus on what women deserve and should receive. The Western female self-help worldview has become incredibly narcissistic and self-centered, representing the further extrapolation of certain strains of feminism. This distinction reflects a deeper cultural divide about personal responsibility versus entitlement.

Why Young Women Are Increasingly Depressed

The emphasis on license and leniency rather than duty leads to a sad, vacuous existence. Young women are increasingly depressed, addicted, and far more likely to be on anti-depressants. Liberalism at its furthest extrapolation becomes a cultural poison, leaving those who embrace it feeling empty despite promises of freedom and self-actualization.

The young woman in the viral video embodied this emptiness, deserving compassion rather than contempt. The worldview being uploaded to young women on a daily basis is hyper-narcissistic and hyper-selfish, centered on the idea that only the individual matters and no one has the right to suggest how they should act. This philosophy makes them miserable.

Women as Norms Enforcers

Women are biologically predisposed to be norms enforcers. They are more likely to follow societal norms, customs, and narratives. They are less likely to defy authority or challenge established systems. This means they are more likely to wear masks, get multiple booster shots, and conform to prevailing institutional guidance.

When societal norms are healthy, this tendency serves society well. However, when societal norms become poisonous, women follow them nonetheless, following the crowd even when it leads to harmful outcomes. College indoctrination has particular power over women because of this biological tendency toward norm enforcement and conformity.

The Question of Information Sources

Where are college-educated white women getting their news and information? It's not CNN, as their ratings aren't high enough to account for this influence. Perhaps they're consuming Eat Pray Love-type podcasting, or maybe they're watching shows like Love is Blind. Understanding their information ecosystem remains an open question without easy answers.

Finding a solution to this problem requires understanding where the indoctrination is occurring and what sources are reinforcing progressive ideology among this demographic. Many of these women tend to be more secular and less serious about their faith, which may contribute to their susceptibility to secular progressive messaging.

Democratic Party Approval Hits Historic Low

Despite the strong support from college-educated white women, the Democratic Party faces an unprecedented crisis in public perception. Steve Kornacki presented polling data showing that the Democratic Party's image has reached minus twenty-eight points, meaning only twenty-seven percent of voters have a positive view of the party while fifty-five percent view it negatively.

This represents the worst rating for either major political party in more than thirty years of polling. The trend line shows that neither party has ever come anywhere close to this level of disapproval. The number has fallen off a cliff for Democrats since the election.

Building a political party around toxic femininity and shrill hall monitor enforcement turns out to be broadly very unpopular with the American people. The Democratic Party seems uninterested in adjusting itself or modernizing its approach despite this historic rejection by voters.

Jamal Bowman Exemplifies the Problem

Former Congressman Jamal Bowman exemplifies the worst tendencies of the modern Democratic Party. In a recent appearance, Bowman attacked Elon Musk as incompetent, calling him a thief and a Nazi, claiming that the American people don't trust him.

Bowman's argument centered on Musk firing tens of thousands of people at the Department of Government Efficiency, being challenged in court, and then having to bring people back. However, this analysis ignores Musk's actual accomplishments, including rescuing astronauts and building multiple successful companies.

Bowman represents the Democratic Party's approach: angry, bitter, spiteful, not particularly bright, and incredibly hostile and aggressive. This is who they want to build their party around, and it explains why their approval ratings have reached historic lows. The contrast between Musk's achievements and Bowman's record of pulling fire alarms in Congress could not be more stark.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!