Charlie Kirk Releases Full Conversation With Gavin Newsom From California Viral Debate on Trans Athletes and Wokeism

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk and Glenn Beck on Trump's Victory, Rush Limbaugh's Legacy, and Bold Personnel Picks for the Second Term

Charlie Kirk and Glenn Beck on Trump's Victory, Rush Limbaugh's Legacy, and Bold Personnel Picks for the Second Term

16:04

Charlie Kirk Explains Why Young Men Are Leading America's Conservative Revival and What the Church Must Do Next

Charlie Kirk Explains Why Young Men Are Leading America's Conservative Revival and What the Church Must Do Next

1:31:08

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why Trump's 2024 Electoral Map Is Better Than 2016 and 2020 Combined

Charlie Kirk Reveals Why Trump's 2024 Electoral Map Is Better Than 2016 and 2020 Combined

33:20

Charlie Kirk banner
2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018

Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.

Charlie Kirk Releases Full Conversation With Gavin Newsom From California Viral Debate on Trans Athletes and Wokeism

Charlie Kirk shares the complete conversation with Governor Gavin Newsom, including his unfiltered commentary throughout. The discussion covers explosive topics including trans athletes in women's sports, where Newsom admits fairness concerns but struggles to take action. Kirk challenges the California governor on critical race theory in schools, book banning accusations, parental notification laws, and why Democrats can't survive long-form podcasting. Kirk explains how Turning Point USA moved the youth vote 13 points toward Trump in four years, crushing the original 10-year goal, and why the Democratic Party's college-educated elite have lost touch with working-class America.

March 7, 2025

The Full Unedited Conversation With Commentary

Charlie Kirk presents the entire viral conversation with Governor Gavin Newsom, complete with his personal commentary and insights throughout. While an unedited version exists on Newsom's YouTube page, Kirk promises viewers want to stay for his analysis of this explosive discussion that covered some of the most contentious political and cultural issues facing America.

The conversation begins with an unexpected revelation: Newsom's 13-year-old son is apparently a big Charlie Kirk fan, desperately wanting to attend the taping and waking up at 6 a.m. hoping to come along before school. Kirk uses this opening to discuss Turning Point USA's mission and encourages viewers to get involved by starting chapters or joining Turning Point Action, the organization he credits with helping move an entire generation toward conservatism.

Building a Conservative Youth Movement

Kirk explains the origins of his 13-year journey with Turning Point USA, which dramatically accelerated when President Trump entered the political scene around 2021. The organization set an ambitious numerical goal: move the youth vote 10 points toward Republicans over 10 years. The hypothesis was simple but powerful—Democrats were taking young voters for granted, had no compelling message, and maintained an ideological monopoly on college campuses.

The results exceeded expectations. Working alongside President Trump's team and capitalizing on the president's strategy of embracing podcasting and TikTok, they achieved their 10-year goal in just four years. Kirk attributes this success partly to Trump becoming a cultural phenomenon, but also to recognizing that young people, especially young men, were experiencing a crisis that Democrats completely ignored.

Kirk points to a sobering reality: for the first time in American history, 30-year-olds will likely have it worse off than their parents—a breakdown of the social compact. This generation is the most alcohol-addicted, drug-addicted, suicidal, depressed, and medicated in history. While the prevailing message told them to lower their expectations and forget the American Dream, Kirk and his organization saw opportunity.

The College Campus Strategy

When Newsom asks about Kirk's strategic focus on college campuses, Kirk explains the practical mathematics: approximately 20 million students on campuses for four years, with nowhere to go but up from the 75% Democratic voting rate when Turning Point started in 2012. Fast forward to the most recent election, and Democrats lost the youth vote in Michigan and nearly lost in Wisconsin and Arizona. Instead of the targeted 10-point movement, they achieved 13 points.

Kirk emphasizes a critical point that Democrats seem unwilling to reckon with: while baby boomers actually saw wealth increases over the last four years and don't buy into the narrative that institutions are broken, younger voters tell a different story. Harris actually performed three points better with baby boomers than Biden did in 2020. According to Kirk, all Harris needed to do was match Biden's 2020 performance with younger voters and she would be president—but she underperformed by approximately 13 points.

From Card Tables to Viral Debates

Kirk shares his humble beginnings—starting with no money, no connections, and no idea what he was doing. At 18 or 19 years old, he would show up at UW-Madison with a card table and a cardboard sign saying "debate me" with provocative statements. He didn't even film these early encounters. When Newsom expresses amazement at Kirk's willingness to debate anyone, anywhere, anytime in such hostile environments, Kirk explains it as a combination of confidence, a desire to challenge predominant views, love of debate, and excitement about stress-testing his ideas.

Kirk acknowledges he's probably "10x better" at the format now than in 2012, crediting study of philosophy and the great books rather than specific debate technique manuals. He also notes his entrepreneurial approach—trying to build something rather than merely seeking credentials, which he wears as a badge of pride representing the majority of Americans who don't have college degrees.

The College Credential Divide

Kirk delivers a pointed critique of the Democratic Party's transformation into a college-credentialed elite that "snobbishly looks down on the muscular class of this country"—the people who kept things running during COVID. He emphasizes that the majority of Americans didn't attend Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, Caltech, or Cal Berkeley, and the Republican Party has become far more representative of them, largely thanks to Trump.

Kirk explains that there are 11 million open jobs that don't require college degrees, and he wrote an entire book called "The College Scam" on this topic. When Newsom pushes back with statistics about college graduates earning a million dollars more in lifetime earnings, being more likely to get married, less likely to divorce, more civically engaged, and living longer, Kirk counters with important nuances: 41% of students who start college don't graduate, and half who do graduate won't use their degree in their affiliated job. The income statistics are skewed by the top 10% of earners—someone studying Computer Engineering at Caltech does great, but someone studying "North African lesbian poetry" at Cal may not.

The Trust in Institutions Divide

Kirk identifies what he believes is the biggest divide in America—not right versus left, but high trust versus low trust in institutions. This dynamic has completely inverted over the past 20 years. In the early 2000s, Democrats were the low-trust party: anti-Iraq War, anti-Bush, anti-NSA, anti-Patriot Act. That's when Democrats had activist spark and energy. Now the positions have flipped entirely.

The right has become the low-trust faction—challenging COVID vaccines, questioning whether public health authorities lied during the pandemic, and skeptical about continued funding for Ukraine. Meanwhile, the left has become high-trust, functioning as gatekeepers of the institutional intellectual regime. College campuses train students to "trust the experts, trust the scientists, trust the leaders of authority," creating an ideological bubble that produces Democratic voters.

Turning Point Action's Ground Game

When the conversation turns to Turning Point Action's ballot-chasing operation in Arizona and Wisconsin, Kirk explains they modeled some practices after the left's organizing tactics. However, he emphasizes a self-limiting principle: "You can't ballot chase if no one wants to vote for you." They tracked data showing Democrats were actually chasing low-propensity Hispanic voters who ended up voting for Trump, essentially doing the Republicans' work for them in precincts that moved 20 points toward Trump.

Kirk acknowledges Democrats are traditionally better organizers—it's in their DNA, with Barack Obama famously starting as a community organizer. Labor unions provide an organizing backbone. But Kirk argues what conservatives have is better ideas and a better message. The strategy was combining organizing practices with a mass movement, which delivered both a national popular vote victory and an overwhelming electoral landslide.

The Trans Athletes Flashpoint

In what becomes the most viral segment of the conversation, Kirk directly challenges Newsom on trans athletes in women's sports. He points to specific cases like AB Hernandez, a biological male about to win the California state championship in the long jump competing against girls. Kirk asks pointedly: "Would you as governor step out and say no men in female sports?"

Newsom admits it's "an issue of fairness" and says he "completely agrees" on that point. But he visibly wrestles with the question, bringing up concerns about showing "humility and grace" toward vulnerable communities with high rates of suicide, anxiety, and depression. Kirk pushes harder, noting this is an 80-20 issue according to New York Times polling—completely lopsided against the Democratic position.

Kirk challenges Newsom to show leadership in California, suggesting he could say he has compassion for trans individuals while acknowledging it's simply not fair for biological males to compete in women's sports. Newsom continues to agree on the fairness issue, revealing he's been "stress testing" this with friends who ask why he won't call it out. He discloses that in 2014, before he was governor, California established legal principles allowing trans athletes in women's sports, and admits Democrats need to "own" and "acknowledge" the fairness problem.

The exchange becomes tense when Newsom notes that every Senate Democrat just voted against a bill addressing this issue. Kirk responds: "You guys are giving us an 80-20 issue that is just permeating the country and it's such an affront to our senses." He argues the issue connects to a broader narrative: Democrats view incidents through an "oppressor-oppressed lens" learned in college, while conservatives view things through a "right or wrong" or "just or unjust" framework. Eventually you run out of oppressors and start creating them out of thin air.

The Devastating "They/Them" Ad

Kirk and Newsom discuss what Kirk identifies as the most effective ad of the 2024 election cycle: "Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you." Newsom admits the ad was "brutal" and "devastating," comparing it to the Willie Horton ad in its political effectiveness. The ad highlighted Harris's enthusiastic support for taxpayer-funded gender reassignment surgery for incarcerated illegal immigrants—a 90-10 issue against Democrats.

Kirk emphasizes the ad wasn't just brilliant political advertising—it reflected truth that voters felt. It crystallized the sense that the country was slipping away. Democrats had a choice: call those voters racist, Nazis, and fascists, or actually listen and ask why a Pittsburgh steel worker who voted Democrat his entire life would vote for Trump despite everything thrown at the former president.

The Woke Awakening of 2020

Kirk traces the explosive growth of what he calls "wokeism" to 2020, specifically the post-George Floyd period. While DEI initiatives existed before, 2020 saw mass adoption and billions of dollars in corporate donations pledged to "racial justice." Kirk finds this insulting on multiple levels: first, where did the money go? The top BLM charity turned out to be "a racket" with Patrisse Cullors allegedly misusing funds for personal security contracts and other questionable expenses.

Second, and more importantly, these corporate initiatives elevated a previously fringe scholarly community like Robin DiAngelo, whose book "White Fragility" essentially argues that white people need to "sit down and shut up and hear how racist you are." She was brought on corporate tours across the country. Kirk argues this phenomenon took months to fully manifest, and actually believes that if Democrats had been "a little less insane on crime" in summer 2020, they would have "completely clobbered" Republicans in November 2020. The riots made the election close.

California's Prop 16 and AB 101

Kirk brings up California's Proposition 16 from 2020, which would have legalized racial preferences by repealing Prop 209 from 1996. Despite institutional support including from Newsom, voters rejected it by 16 points. Kirk identifies this as a perfect example of wokeism: all the institutions embraced "this insane ballot measure" but even California voters didn't want legalized racial discrimination.

Kirk also references AB 101 and critical race theory principles being taught in California public schools. When Newsom questions whether CRT exists in K-12 education, arguing it's a PhD-level theory taught by people like Derrick Bell and Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kirk counters that principles filter down just like advanced physics concepts appear in eighth-grade science. He specifically mentions over 50 California schools conducting "privilege walks"—exercises where students walk ahead based on certain questions designed to demonstrate that white students have privilege.

Newsom acknowledges needing to "get back into the classroom" on these issues, admitting it's "very illuminating and helpful" to understand the source of conservative anger.

The Book Banning Debate

When Newsom brings up book banning, citing 4,200-4,240 books or titles banned in libraries and schools in 2020, Kirk immediately reframes the issue: "I think we can both agree pornography should not be taught to 9-year-olds." Newsom agrees, saying "fair point." Kirk explains that Moms for Liberty's entire contention was simply "no porn to 10-year-olds," and both should agree those books should be banned.

Newsom then suggests the Bible could be included in book bans, specifically mentioning Song of Solomon. Kirk, a man of faith, pushes back firmly, saying he wouldn't characterize Song of Solomon as pornography. He emphasizes that the books in question contain not just provocative words but highly graphic images that would "take your breath away."

When Newsom frames this as government deciding what people can read, Kirk responds that this is "the exercise of politics"—the highest form of community because it blends morality and sociability. Through discussion, elections, and boards and commissions, communities collectively decide standards like "no porn for 10-year-olds." Newsom appears uncomfortable with Kirk's characterization of the Bible issue, saying he's never heard that argument before.

Parental Notification Laws

Kirk challenges Newsom on California law preventing school districts from requiring teachers to notify parents if their children are transitioning genders. Newsom disputes Kirk's characterization, saying teachers can't be fired for choosing not to "snitch" on kids, and the law wasn't just about trans issues but also about gay students. Kirk reframes it: how can parents know what's happening with their children if teachers aren't required to tell them?

Newsom argues this prevents teachers from being fired for not policing recess conversations between students. Kirk counters that they're talking about different things—not casual conversations, but situations where a teacher accommodates and affirms a student's desire to transition without parental knowledge. He says he's met parents who only discovered this when their child came home from school.

Newsom acknowledges these issues are politically unhelpful personally and for the Democratic Party brand, which "has just been crushed." However, he maintains that he doesn't mind losing on principle sometimes, noting that Kirk holds deeply unpopular beliefs on issues like same-sex marriage but doesn't abandon them for electoral advantage. Kirk agrees he's in the minority on that issue and respects that Newsom isn't abandoning his principles just for politics.

Long-Form Media Dominance

When discussing how Democrats can compete, Newsom laments the asymmetry of Trump and Elon Musk sending tweets versus him doing "a three-minute hit at 3:00 in the afternoon on CNN." Kirk credits Newsom for doing long-form podcasting because it penetrates different audiences, but identifies a critical problem: "Democrats cannot survive in long-form podcasting environments. It's too unscripted, it's too masculine honestly."

When Newsom laughs at the "masculine" characterization, Kirk doubles down, explaining that success in new media requires showing forgotten America that you can "intellectually joust with no script, no hard breaks, no producers in the ears, no teleprompters." He argues that politics and entertainment have become indecipherable from one another, and Donald Trump became a cultural phenomenon visible even in inner-city Compton with "fight fight fight" shirts.

Kirk argues Democrats haven't built intellectual muscle over 30 years because they all agree with each other, while Republicans have "immense and vocal and public spats all the time"—fighting about foreign policy, Ukraine, and even threatening primary challenges to senators meeting with Zelensky. The Democratic Party would never do that. This constant dialogue toward finding approximations of truth explains why 8 of the top 10 long-form podcasts are conservative or center-right: Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Theo Von, the Paul Brothers, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro, and Matt Walsh. The singular left-leaning entry is Pod Save America, which Kirk describes as "a bunch of Obama Bros agreeing with each other for 90 minutes."

Why Young Men Moved Right

Kirk returns repeatedly to the theme that young people, especially young men, were experiencing a genuine crisis that Democrats ignored while Republicans addressed. He emphasizes that men are "half of the population and necessary for any society and civilization to succeed"—requiring both strong men and strong women. The approach was "unique and creative," and Trump became a cultural phenomenon who rose above everything thrown at him, including potentially 700 years in federal prison, states trying to remove him from the ballot, and an assassination attempt.

Trump personified what young people, especially young men, wanted: an American comeback story, an ascendant rebel attitude against institutions that have failed them. According to Rasmussen polling Kirk cites, 60% of voters under 30 now support President Trump. While Newsom suggests that number might be "a little rich," he concedes it's "directionally true."

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!