Up Next
House Democrats Vote Against Honoring Charlie Kirk After His Assassination Sparks National Outcry
48:03
Hunter Kozak Was Debating Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University When the Assassination Happened
42:58
The Disturbing Truth About Charlie Kirk's Views: A Compilation of His Own Words
17:28
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar Introduces War Powers Resolution to Restrict Unauthorized Military Strikes
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar joins Mehdi Hasan to discuss her new war powers resolution aimed at reining in presidential authority to conduct military strikes without congressional approval. The Minnesota representative addresses the recent controversial killing of a Venezuelan vessel in the Caribbean, the broader issue of drone strikes across Somalia and other regions, and the constitutional requirement that Congress declare war. Omar also shares her perspective on political violence, threats against public officials, and the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, while calling out what she sees as partisan hypocrisy on issues of safety and accountability.
War Powers Resolution Targets Unauthorized Military Action
Congresswoman Ilhan Omar appeared on Zeteo's live town hall to announce her introduction of a war powers resolution designed to enforce constitutional separation of powers. The resolution addresses what Omar describes as a pattern of unauthorized military strikes carried out by the president without congressional approval, which she argues violates the constitutional mandate that Congress declares war.
The immediate catalyst for the resolution was a strike against a Venezuelan vessel in the Caribbean. Omar emphasized that under both international and U.S. law, the administration cannot simply terminate people without proper legal justification. The strike killed 11 people aboard the boat, whom the White House claimed were drug traffickers, though no evidence has been provided to substantiate that claim.
According to reporting from The New York Times, the vessel was turning around at the time it was bombed, undermining any self-defense argument the administration might make. Omar noted that even if the individuals were drug traffickers, there is no death penalty for drug trafficking, and summary execution is not permitted under U.S. law.
Lack of Congressional Briefings Raises Concerns
Omar pointed out that the administration has conducted no briefings for members of Congress, including those serving on committees with relevant jurisdiction such as the Foreign Affairs Committee, Intelligence Committee, and Armed Services Committee. She argues this lack of transparency demonstrates the administration knows it lacks legal justification for its actions.
The war powers resolution would require the administration to come to Congress within 60 days to obtain a vote specifically on their authority to conduct such strikes. It would also restrict funding if congressional approval is not obtained, asserting Congress's constitutional power of the purse.
A Bipartisan Problem of Endless War
Omar acknowledged that building support for the resolution will be challenging, as the "war machine" has been supported in a bipartisan manner. While she expressed hope that a few Republicans like Thomas Massie and Cory Mills might support the measure, she admitted that even among Democrats, there would not be a huge coalition backing the resolution.
The congresswoman highlighted that the problem extends far beyond the Caribbean incident. The president has conducted a record number of strikes in Somalia since taking office, continuing a pattern from his first term. She noted that the original authorization for military force in Afghanistan has been used by presidents from Bush through Obama, Biden, and Trump to justify drone attacks throughout the world.
Omar stated that many innocent people have been killed in these strikes without accountability. She pointed out that while President Obama was known for controversial drone strikes, the current president severely surpassed Obama's numbers in his first term. In just eight months of his second term, dozens of people have been killed in Somalia and other parts of the world.
International Law Without Enforcement
When asked about the meaning of international law when violations go unpunished, Omar explained that the United Nations has been unable to carry out its mandate to hold international actors accountable for crimes against humanity. This is partly because countries like the United States hold significant leverage within UN bodies that are supposed to provide accountability.
The lack of consequences has eroded any meaningful accountability that state actors might face. Omar drew a connection between the impunity the United States grants itself and the impunity granted to Israel, noting that both operate under similar frameworks that allow violations of international norms without consequence.
Political Violence and Personal Safety Concerns
The conversation shifted to address the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Omar described hearing the news as mortifying, immediately thinking of Kirk's wife and children. She referenced conversations her husband has had with the daughters of Malcolm X about witnessing their father's execution in the 1960s and the lasting trauma that experience created.
When asked about her own safety concerns, Omar acknowledged that public servants face constant risk. She revealed that she deals with numerous death threats and has had multiple people incarcerated for threatening to assassinate her. The fear is not just personal but extends to her family, who worry constantly. That morning, her husband's last words as she left for work were to please be extra careful.
Omar also mentioned that a couple of months prior, one of her colleagues and mentors, former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, were assassinated in their home. Her friend John Hoffman and his wife were also shot at but survived. Omar and others were on the same assassin's list and have to live with the knowledge that they were lucky while their friends were not.
Partisan Response to Political Violence
Omar criticized the response from the right following Kirk's assassination, particularly statements from Elon Musk and the president claiming this represented left-wing political violence. She found it cynical given the constant credible threats she and other Democratic officials face. Multiple men have been prosecuted over the years for threatening her life, including one who had bullets at his office and another from Florida, with a Connecticut case currently in progress.
She expected the president's address to the nation would have been more compassionate and less partisan, noting that he labeled the assassin a left-wing lunatic before even knowing the shooter's identity. Omar felt this denigrated both his status and the office he holds.
The congresswoman also pointed out contradictions in Kirk's public statements, including his claim that guns save lives following a school shooting, his description of George Floyd as a scumbag while downplaying his death at the hands of Minneapolis police, and his opposition to Juneteenth, which she characterized as downplaying slavery and Black history.
The Politicization of Tragedy
Omar expressed frustration with attempts to whitewash Kirk's record in death. While she has empathy for his family and believes in grace and mercy as taught by her faith, she rejected the notion that pointing out someone's actual record constitutes inappropriate criticism. The politicizing, she argued, is being done by the right.
She contrasted the president's response to Kirk's death with his handling of Hortman's assassination. The president awarded Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously and ordered flags at half-mast, but did not even attend Hortman's funeral. Instead, he mocked Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and tried to blame him for the killing. Senator Mike Lee of Utah, the state where Kirk was killed, had made jokes about the Minnesota killings just months earlier.
Omar emphasized that Hortman was known for kindness in both public and private life, while Kirk had wanted to bail out the person who attacked Paul Pelosi and put him in the hospital while attempting to assassinate Nancy Pelosi. She called for people to live in reality and understand who is actually causing harm and division.
Security and Double Standards
When asked why Secret Service protection would be removed from former Vice President Kamala Harris and others like John Bolton, Omar pointed to this as evidence that the administration does not take political violence seriously when it affects political opponents. She stated that the reality is they don't mind if people like Harris get killed, and this represents the environment in which we are living.
Omar stressed that unless there is a collective decision that the current situation is not normal and a commitment to actual civility, the violence will continue. She called for people not to allow hateful rhetoric to find the audience it currently enjoys.
Addressing Root Causes
Omar referenced one of Kirk's final social media posts, which she said contained a video clip where he discussed Muslims teaming up with trans people and socialists to bring about the end of Western civilization. She argued that when someone makes a statement like that, they are essentially calling for the extinction of Muslims in America. The post had received millions of views.
She called on people to recognize such rhetoric and refuse to follow, platform, or give a megaphone to individuals promoting it. Instead, she urged uplifting people who are trying to build a country that achieves the perfect union the founding fathers discussed, those calling for peace, those who want families to remain united, and those not trying to demonize and dehumanize others.
On the issue of gun violence, Omar acknowledged that political division, speech, incitement, and hate would not be solved overnight. However, she argued that access to guns for people prone to violence could be restricted, and the number of weapons of war on the streets could be reduced. She noted that multiple school shootings occurred on the same day Kirk was assassinated, yet she doubted Republicans would support gun control measures even in the wake of this tragedy.
Omar concluded by expressing optimism that people will ultimately do the right thing, both on the war powers resolution and on broader issues of violence and accountability.
Video Transcript
Welcome to a Zateo live town hall. We
are streaming live on Substack and on
YouTube. I'm Medi Hassan and I'm joined
today by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of the
great state of Minnesota. Uh thank you
for joining us uh on the live stream.
You're here I do want to talk to you
about obviously the huge story in the
news uh the horrific murder of Charlie
Ko. But you're here specifically because
you are introducing a resolution today
to do what? a war powers resolution to
make sure that we actually um enforce uh
the the constitution which you know sets
uh powers of um separation. Uh it is
congress that declares war. Uh and we
have not been given um that that
authority by by this president and it's
I think really important um for us to
insert um our our authority in in
declaring war. What we are seeing with
multiple strikes uh throughout um the
the world that the president has
authorized is that he does not have the
authority to be able to do so. Uh and
specifically this strike that was
carried out in the Caribbean against the
Venezuelan um vessel, I think it's
important for the people to to recognize
that
we cannot just go out and terminate
people. Um, you know, this is this is
not something that is allowed under
international law and is certainly not
allowed under US law.
>> Certainly. And the AUMF, the
authorization for the use of military
force for Iraq, I believe, was just
rescended in the House. Uh, that took
decades. Uh, there is no authorization
to blow up boats in the Caribbean 2,000
miles out from the US shoreline. Say
there are imminent threat as Peter
Hexith and Donald Trump claimed. Uh
there were 11, just to remind people
watching, there were 11 people on board
this boat. The White House says they
killed. They claim they were drug
traffickers. No evidence has been
provided to show that they were drug
traffickers. Even if they were, there's
no death penalty for drug traffickers.
You can't just kill people because you
say they're drug traffickers. And the
New York Times congressman reports this
week that the boat was turning around.
So even if it was filled with narot
terrorists, as they claim, it wasn't a
threat to the US. It wasn't even heading
towards the US when they were bombed
repeatedly.
>> Yeah. I mean, and and and well, one,
yeah, that gets rid of the self-defense
um argument. Uh we we know that they
they they don't have a clear um
justification in in what they did, which
is why they didn't come to Congress,
which is why they haven't done a single
briefing for um members of Congress,
especially those who have uh
jurisdiction. um whether it is uh the
foreign affairs committee uh the intel
committee or armed services committee um
and and and that is because one as we've
learned in the New York Times the the
self-defense uh argument doesn't
um hold up. We know that um they were
turning that that vote around. Um, we
know uh that our laws do not allow um
for us to strike uh people because they
are designated as a terrorist. Yeah. Um,
we also know our laws do not allow us uh
to strike people without um any sort of
justification and so they don't really
have any grounds to stand um when it
comes to the actions that they took
against um the the Venezuelans on the
Caribbean.
>> So we know that they don't have any
grounds, but your war powers resolution
would clarify this, right? It would
force the administration within 60 days
to come to Congress and get a get a vote
specifically on their power to do this.
>> Yes.
>> And it would restrict funding, right, if
they don't get that vote because
Congress is supposed to control the
purse, even though he is the
commander-in-chief, the president, uh he
can't just willy-nilly declare war
without Congress or go into military
conflicts. And it's not just in the
Caribbean, right? He's been bombing
Somalia this year. No one ever talks
about that, but there's been a record
number of strikes in Somalia since he
came to office. He's drone strike all
over the place both in his first term
and now in his second term. He can't do
that unless Congress turns a blind eye.
Why is it so many of your colleagues
turn a blind eye to these endless wars
and to the president just bombing and
assassinating whoever he likes?
>> Yeah. I mean the the the the original
authorization
um that that was given to to go after
terrorists in Afghanistan
um has been a justification that that
we've seen presidents from Bush to Obama
to Biden to Trump um to carry out these
drone attacks uh throughout the world.
Um we have seen in many cases innocent
people have been killed uh and we
haven't been held accountable uh for for
those debts. The one thing that people
you know oftentimes will remember is the
fact that Obama was the um
disastrous when it came to carrying out
drone strikes um and killing innocent
people. But what they don't know is that
Trump in his first term severely
>> yes
>> surpassed the the number of attacks and
the number of innocent people that were
being ke killed that the United States
wasn't being held accountable for and
even now in his second term just in the
last eight months there has been you
know dozens and dozens of people who
have been killed not just in Somalia but
um in in other parts of the world as
well and again, right? Like there are
cases within the ICC, within the ICJ.
We, you know, I I talk to families
around the world all the time who have
had their family members killed by the
United States drones uh attacks. And we
don't have a clear understanding to this
day on why these people have been
murdered with with our name and with our
resources as taxpayers in the United
States. I assume Republican colleagues
of yours in the House will not vote for
this war pass resolution. How many of
your Democratic colleagues do you think
will get behind you?
>> I mean, there have been actually
surprisingly um some some Republicans
previously
>> like a couple. Yes,
>> a couple like Thomas Massie and
occasionally MTG.
>> No, I've worked with Matt Gett um
>> he's not in Congress anymore.
>> He's not in Congress. Um but I know that
you know people like Cory Mills and
others are have been interested so that
we might be able to get uh Republicans.
But yes, as as you are alluding to, uh
there isn't going to be um a huge
coalition of Democrats that are going to
be on board. Uh because unfortunately
this war machine that we have in this
country has been supported in a
bipartisan way. Uh and many people I I
think because this is out of sight, out
of mind, they don't really pay attention
to the innocent lives that are being
lost. Yeah. uh to the actions um of of
our military.
>> If uh if you are watching on Substack or
YouTube, please feel free to stick your
questions for Congresswoman Omar in the
in the chat on YouTube. Why asks, "What
is the meaning of international law if
breaking it has no consequences? What's
the point of the UN?" I mean, we're
talking about constraining the president
within Congress, but international law
doesn't seem to constrain him either.
No, I mean I and unfortunately um you
know we the the the United Nations has
really not had uh an ability um to carry
out its mandate, right? To to hold these
international actors accountable um when
they are committing crimes against
humanity.
uh and and that is partially because
countries like the United States um hold
a lot of leverage uh when when it comes
to bodies within uh the UN that are
supposed to hold them accountable and we
also know that there is a lot of weight
against the sanctions that we can place
on people. Uh and so that kind of has
eroded any sort of accountability
uh that any state actor um within the
United States um ever facing any sort of
accountability.
>> Yes. The lack of accountability from
Israel to the US is very clear right
now. Um, let me ask you,
>> provide the impunity that Israel
operates indeed because we also, you
know, operate.
>> We give we give ourselves the same
impunity to to kill people in the middle
of the Caribbean. I mean, this was not
US waters. This was not anywhere near
2,000 miles away, right? This was not
just some boat approaching the Florida
coast, uh, which was taken out. It was,
uh, it was it was a cold-blooded killing
um, of people who may have been
migrants, may not have even been, uh,
drug traffickers. We have no idea.
That's the whole point. Um I on on the
subject of of I've got to ask big story
in the news right now. Obviously the
biggest story in the US right now. Uh
the killing of Charlie Kirk uh the
conservative uh activist uh provocator
killed in Utah yesterday. What was your
reaction when you heard that news
yesterday?
>> It was really mortifying um to to hear
the news uh to to see the video. you
know, all I could think about was his
wife, um, his children. Uh, that image
is going to live forever. Um, you know,
my my husband has known the the
daughters of Malcolm and they have
talked to him about, you know, what
being
in person for their dad's execution
meant to them. And
>> Malcolm X back in the 60s,
>> Malcolm X. Yes. Um, what that trauma has
meant for them. uh and you know decades
later they still carry that trauma and
so I I I my heart does break um for for
those babies.
>> Mahmud Sha Aayub uh asks on Substack,
are you concerned about your own safety?
Yeah, I mean you know what what this
brings up and and other uh politically
motivated assassinations bring up for
public servants like myself and public
officials is the fact that we are in
those kind of situations all the time.
You know, there isn't going to be enough
security, enough screening uh to ever
shield you. Um, and that reality,
especially when you are a parent,
um, is is mortifying because not only do
you want that kind of image to
traumatize your children, you also don't
want, um, your children living in that
fear of my mom is a public servant. She
might get killed and I have to live
without her. Uh, and this is, you know,
a conversation I had to have with my
with my kids yesterday.
Um, I'm someone who deals with lots of
death threats. Um, and you know, who's
had multiple people incarcerated because
they threatened to assassinate me. Um,
it is it is a constant thing that, you
know, we think about, we worry about.
Um, but we also know that our families
actually think a lot more about it and
are constantly concerned. I mean this
morning when I left for work, you know,
my my that was the first last thing my
husband said to me, please be extra
careful.
>> Yeah.
>> Um and and it is, you know, it's it's a
it's a it's a deep concern. And you
know, couple of months ago, one of my
colleagues and mentors, uh the former
speaker Melissa Herman and and her
husband Mark, uh were assassinated in
their home. Um my good friend um John
Hoffman and his wife Yevette uh were
also um shot at but you know luckily
survived
um and in in Minnesota. And so a lot of
us who who were on that list um of of
that assassin,
you know, have have to live with with
the
>> um idea of knowing that we got lucky. Um
but our friends were not so lucky. They
were not. And you're right, it is a
scary time. The number of texts uh I've
received over the last 24 hours from
people telling me stop doing public
events. Uh get more security. Uh it's
the US right now is is not a great place
to live, especially if you're in the
public eye, especially if you're doing
politics or journalism as you and I are.
Um what happened to Charlie Ko was
horrific, inexcusable. Uh part of an
American political culture that has
become very violent. We've seen over the
last 24 hours um Congresswoman the right
online led by Elon Musk and Donald Trump
in his televised address here saying
this is a left-wing problem. This is
left-wing political violence. The left
have demonized the right and incited
violence against them and it kind of
airbrushes out as you say the threats
against you. You've had multiple men
over the years. I think in 2019 there
was a guy who phoned your office
threatening to kill you. They found
bullets at his office. He went to
prison. There was a guy from Florida a
couple of years ago. I believe there's a
guy in Connecticut right now uh being
prosecuted. There's a lot of people you
you when I when I when I knew you were
coming on today to talk about the war
powers resolution, I actually thought
sadly there is no more appropriate a
Democratic guest than to talk about
Charlie Co than you because you were
also on the kill list that this guy
allegedly had this summer who was
obviously killed the former speaker of
the Minnesota House and her husband and
injured two others. And I just think to
myself, how cynical is it for bigname
figures on the right, Donald Trump, Elon
Musk, many others, Nancy Mace yesterday,
saying this is a Democratic Party
problem, as if people like you are not
getting death threats all the time,
credible ones.
>> I mean, it is it's it's actually
disgusting. Um and
you know it it it it reminds you that
although these people pretend to be um
adults that they are sometimes you know
that they they think a lot less than
even children do um when it comes to
compassion when it comes to uh
thoughtfulness when it comes to being a
leader. Um you know I did expect the
president's address to
the nation would have been a lot more
compassionatefilled. it would have been
less partisan. Um we he doesn't even
know who the assassin is for him to say
wing uh lunatic. Um it it it it I think
it kind of denigrated um his status and
and the status of of the office he
holds. Um, but what what I do know for
sure is that, you know, Charlie was
someone who once said, um, you know,
guns save lives,
um, after a a school shooting. Um,
Charlie was someone who was willing to
debate and downplay the death of George
Floyd uh, in the hands of Minneapolis
police.
>> I think he called him a scumbag,
>> right? Have no regard. um downplay
slavery and what black people have gone
through in in this country uh by saying
Juneen should never exist. Um and and I
think you know the the there are a lot
of people who are out there talking
about him just wanting to have a civil
debate.
>> Complete rewriting of a complete
rewriting of history.
>> Yeah. There is nothing um more effed up,
you know, like uh than to than to
completely pretend that, you know, his
words and actions
um have not been recorded and and and in
existence um for for the last decade or
so.
and and you know, you you have people
like Nancy Mays who constantly harass,
you know, people that she finds inferior
and and wants them not to exist in in in
in this country or ever. Um, and you
know, you have people like Trump who has
incited violence against people like me.
And so, you know, the these people are
full of [ __ ] and it's important for us
to to call them out while we feel
anger and sadness and and have, you
know, empathy, which uh Charlie said,
"No, it shouldn't exist because that's a
newly created word or something like I
have empathy for his kids and his wife
and what they're going through because I
don't I do not want
>> no one should no one should go through
that and and we hold ourselves, I hope,
to higher standards. And and we consider
you and I as people of deep faith. Um
and and our faiths are based on grace
and mercy which is empathy. Uh and and
we want you know like for people not to
dance on our grave because that that is
not what our faith teaches us. We want
to be able to to mourn and and pray um
for for this.
>> But the but the the problem is the
politicizing is being done by we have
>> the politicizing is being done by the
right. Right. Like my this is always my
problem when a public figure dies and
people say you shouldn't say anything
negative. I'm happy to not say anything
negative and you know let the family
mourn but it's when everyone else tries
to kind of do a whitewashing of who that
person was. So obviously it was
inexcusable to use violence against
Charlie Kirk and to kill Charlie Kirk.
No one supports the killing of anyone uh
for their speech. Um, but then the idea
that Donald Trump now says Presidential
Medal of Freedom, flags at half mass, is
the same Donald Trump who didn't even
show up at the funeral uh for
Representative Melissa Hortman who was
killed in the summer and her husband
didn't make, you know, mocked Tim Waltz,
the governor of Minnesota, tried to
blame him uh for the killing. Like those
kind of people, as you say, are full of
[ __ ] and we reserve the right to call
them out even at a time of uh tragedy
and and and tension like this. Um,
>> as a friend of um, Melissa and and John,
to me, what was the most painful thing
was the fact that they were debating
their character, that they were
downplaying um, and
>> you're making jokes. I mean, Senator
Mike Lee, the Republican from Utah, the
state where this happened, was making
jokes a couple of months ago about what
happened in Minnesota.
>> Yeah. And and in reality, you know, like
Melissa in her public life and in her
private life was somebody who was the
nicest person you would ever meet. Um
and and like Charlie who wanted to bail
out the the person who went to go kill
Paul Pelosi. Yeah.
>> Um and you know, put him in the hospital
and wanted to assassinate uh Nancy
Pelosi for her political ideology. It
just I I just want people to live in
reality and understand where the problem
is and people who, you know, are
carrying out these rhetorics that are
causing harm and division in our country
and not come for those of us who are
just trying to tell the truth about
where we are and where we need to go.
>> We're running out of time. Michael
Hernandez asked a good question on
YouTube. Uh he says, um, "In this
environment, why would you take away
Secret Service protection from the
former vice president? Trump happily
pulled protection from Harris and I
believe from people like John Bolton,
who I'm not a fan of, but I don't want
to see John Bolton killed. Um, he's
pulled protection from a lot of people
he doesn't like. Doesn't sound like
someone taking political violence that
seriously when it's people he doesn't
like.
>> No, I mean, and that and that's the
thing. It's they they are never willing
or care to um worry about when you know
it's it's those of us on the other side
of the aisle that are getting death
threats that have had their houses shot
up that have had you know people show up
to their homes. they're willing to
actually take away the security and the
safety um of of people like VP Harris u
because they don't mind they don't mind
her getting killed and and that is the
the reality in which we are living in
and we have to continue to to talk about
um because unless we all collectively
make a decision that this is not normal
and that we are going to actually be
civil um you know this is going to
continue
>> 100% and it is going to continue. I
should point out um before we wrap up.
Well, there's a important an important
comment here that we have. Let me pull
it up. I just saw it in front of me. Oh,
yes. Shaun B I'm just going to repeat
what Shawn B says on YouTube in the
comments. They keep saying it was
politically motivated, but how do we
know if they don't even know who the
shooter was? Like at least with Melissa
Hortman and other instance, we know the
guy was a Trump supporter. We know he
was a right-wing crazy. In this case, we
have no idea. It could be a leftwinger,
could be a right-winger, could be
someone mentally ill. Who knows?
I mean and and and
that is important um for you know for
Sean to to realize because when it comes
to
uh an an an attack whether it is a
school shooting or a shooting in a movie
theater or you know a politician gets
shot up they are quick to make uh the
assumption of of who the shooters are
while we sit there and you know try to
talk about you know solutions, try to
talk about you know the family
>> gun control but nobody wants to talk
about gun control
>> you know h have have a rational
conversation they want to point the
finger uh because to them they don't
really care about the life that is lost
it's about who I can demonize
>> uh and and that demonization is is what
leads to lives being taken and I want
them to realize that they can't continue
to set the fires that end up consuming
booming them and cry about it.
>> So, uh I should point out Mhod on
Substack says the right-wing charges
that the left promotes this violence.
It's pure projection. Trump's speech
being an example. Agree with you, Mers.
Uh Britney says for them to decry
political violence when they are
violently ripping families apart at home
and abroad because of political
nonsense. It's all theater to them. Well
said, uh Britney. I'm going to make this
the last question to you, Congresswoman.
Dr. Monica Joy Cross says, "How do we
fix this? This is a persistent problem.
Are there answers?
>> The the answer is not to allow this the
the the hateful rhetoric uh to find the
audience that it finds. I mean, one of
you know, Charlie's uh last tweets that
that I read was um a video clip of him.
Um I think in that clip he talked about
you um and and said you know Muslims are
like bringing an ideology and you know
teaming up with trans and like
socialists
um to bring about the end of western
civilization which you know when you
make a statement like that then you are
saying you know find every Muslim you
can um find in this country and make
sure that they are no longer a threat
which is calling for our extinction and
so it is important and that you know it
had hundreds millions of uh views on it.
I think it is important for people to
see that kind of rhetoric and say no
this is not the the kind of person that
I want to follow. This is not the kind
of person I want to platform. This is
not the kind of person that should have
this this megaphone. uh and and give
people who are trying to, you know,
build a country where we can have that
perfect union that the founding fathers
talked about.
>> Uplift those people. Uplift the ones
that are calling for peace. Uplift the
ones that want families to remain um
united. Uplift the ones that are not
trying to demonize and dehumanize
others.
>> Um 100% agree. And I would just say one
thing. I don't think we're going to
solve the issue of political division or
speech or incitement or hate overnight,
but we could just restrict crazy people
and hate people's access to guns. We
could restrict the number of weapons of
war on the streets. And I I you know, if
you really do care about the killing of
Charlie Kirk, as many on the right say
they do. I saw Glenn Beck and Megan
Kelly crying on air. I'm sure it's
genuine tears. I'm sure he was a friend
of theirs. But if you truly care about
his death and killing, how about
preventing future killings? There were
multiple school shootings yesterday on
the same day that Charlie Kirk was
assassinated. Let's do something about
the guns, but I suspect congressman, the
Republican party won't be joining you uh
in that endeavor even now. And we will
wait to see if they join you in your war
powers resolution uh to see if they
actually are against big government and
executive tyranny and reclaiming power
for Congress over war and peace. So, uh
I hope you keep us updated on the war
powers resolution. We'd love to have you
back to talk about that if it goes
anywhere.
>> The optimist. So I will keep faith that
people will end up doing the right
thing.
>> Thank you, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.
Thank you so much for your time.
Appreciate you.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this video.