Dave Smith and Candace Owens Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy, Israel Lobby Pressure, and Conservative Media's Future

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Candace Owens Reveals Charlie Kirk Turned Against Israel 48 Hours Before His Assassination With Explosive Group Chat Proof

Candace Owens Reveals Charlie Kirk Turned Against Israel 48 Hours Before His Assassination With Explosive Group Chat Proof

27:38

Joe Kent Reveals He Was Stopped from Investigating Potential Foreign Involvement in Charlie Kirk Assassination

Joe Kent Reveals He Was Stopped from Investigating Potential Foreign Involvement in Charlie Kirk Assassination

12:18

Candace Owens Exposes Josh Hammer's Lies About Charlie Kirk and Explores Military Flight Evidence

Candace Owens Exposes Josh Hammer's Lies About Charlie Kirk and Explores Military Flight Evidence

27:58

Dave Smith and Candace Owens Discuss Charlie Kirk's Legacy, Israel Lobby Pressure, and Conservative Media's Future

Dave Smith sits down with Candace Owens to discuss the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination and the intense pressure campaign from the Israel lobby that preceded it. Owens, whose podcast recently became number one globally, shares her firsthand account of Charlie's final months, the millions in donor funding pulled from Turning Point USA, and the coordinated attempts to erase his evolving stance on Israel. They examine the lies told about Charlie's legacy, the suspicious circumstances surrounding his death, and what his loss means for the future of the conservative movement. This conversation reveals the forces at work behind the scenes in conservative media and politics.

November 8, 2025

The Number One Podcast in the World

Dave Smith welcomes Candace Owens to Part of the Problem, fresh off the news that her show has become the number one podcast globally according to Podscribe. Owens reflects on the significance of this achievement, particularly given the massive cancellation campaign directed at her over the past two years. After parting ways with The Daily Wire, Owens faced coordinated efforts to destroy her career, including getting her banned from Australia and pressuring organizations like Turning Point USA not to platform her.

The free market response, however, told a different story. Despite attempts to artificially remove her from platforms and restrict her reach, audiences flocked to her independent show. Owens emphasizes that her success demonstrates what happens when the market is allowed to operate freely, rather than being manipulated by those who want to control the narrative. She notes that these same forces previously worked to deplatform figures like Alex Jones and The Gateway Pundit, then claimed to be number one in a restricted marketplace.

Standing for Truth on Israel and Palestine

Owens explains that her journey on the Israel-Palestine issue began not from a position of being anti-Israel, but from simply wanting to learn about a topic she didn't fully understand. When violence escalated, she saw images of Palestinian children that reminded her of her own daughter and felt compelled to investigate further. This curiosity was met with immediate and vicious attacks demanding she fall in line with a particular narrative.

Rather than comply, she began educating herself by speaking with various voices, including Dave Smith and Bassam Youssef, and watching content that challenged her previous assumptions. She had been working for PragerU and The Daily Wire alongside Zionists and held no animosity toward the Zionist cause. But when she began asking questions and seeking understanding, she faced what she describes as a psychological operation designed to break her.

The pressure campaign included attempts to cancel her speaking events, getting her banned from countries, and coordinated messaging from figures like Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, and others warning people not to even engage with certain voices. Owens received messages telling her that retweeting someone like Max Blumenthal meant associating with a committed anti-semite, even when the retweet had nothing to do with Israel.

Charlie Kirk's Transformation and the Donor Pressure

The heart of the conversation centers on Charlie Kirk and what Owens describes as a concerted effort to erase his evolving stance on Israel. In the wake of Kirk's assassination, Owens came forward with information about the intense pressure he faced from the Israel lobby and major donors. She revealed that millions of dollars had been pulled from Turning Point USA after Kirk hosted Tucker Carlson and Dave Smith at events where they criticized Israeli government policies.

These claims were initially dismissed as conspiracy theories and anti-semitic lies by figures like Josh Hammer. However, receipts soon emerged confirming that donor funds had indeed been withdrawn, and that Kirk had written in a group chat that he was being forced to abandon Israel. Andrew Kolvet, Kirk's right-hand man at Turning Point, confirmed the authenticity of these messages and revealed that he sent screenshots to authorities because he found the information relevant to the investigation.

Perhaps most significantly, Benjamin Netanyahu himself selectively quoted from a letter Kirk had written, cherry-picking lines about supporting Israel while omitting the context that the letter was about how the hasbara messaging was failing and Kirk was getting killed politically. Netanyahu's immediate involvement in asserting Kirk's legacy as unwavering on Israel raised serious questions about why a sitting foreign prime minister would be so invested in controlling the narrative around an American activist's death.

The Lies About Charlie's Final Days

Owens details numerous instances where those close to Kirk lied about his final days and state of mind. Josh Hammer immediately claimed that Kirk's last words to him were about remaining committed to Israel, a claim Owens finds not only false but demonic given that Hammer knew Kirk was struggling with these issues. Even Kirk's conversion to Catholicism was downplayed or denied, with people claiming he just appreciated church architecture despite the fact that he attended Mass daily and had a St. Michael pendant.

The coordinated lying extended to financial matters, with Kirk reportedly expressing concern about not knowing where money was coming from or going within his own organization. Seven days before his death, he initiated a personal audit through a Doge committee to investigate the organization's finances. For someone to be uncertain about the financial operations of their own hundred-million-dollar organization is highly unusual.

Owens also found it suspicious that Trump mentioned a random child, Breyn Holland, whom Kirk had interviewed, in his memorial speech. This seemed like an attempt to position a new, controllable figure as Kirk's successor. The entire pattern suggested a coordinated effort to control both Kirk's legacy and the future of Turning Point USA.

The Federal Investigation and Cover-Up

The official narrative around Kirk's death involves numerous red flags. The FBI's timeline doesn't add up, and their communications read like they were written in the 1800s rather than contemporary messages between young agents. The family has contradicted federal claims about why the suspect turned himself in, stating that authorities essentially gave him no choice. The ballistics story about Kirk stopping a .306 round with his neck, which would normally decapitate someone, being framed as a miracle rather than investigated as suspicious.

Owens emphasizes that while she doesn't claim to know exactly what happened, she knows with certainty that the official story is false. Every aspect involves lies or suspicious omissions. When those in positions of authority consistently lie about verifiable facts, it suggests a cover-up of something significant.

The Hypocrisy of Conservative Media

Smith and Owens discuss how figures like Ben Shapiro and others rose to prominence during the woke years by positioning themselves as defenders of free speech and open debate. They constantly criticized the left for relying on censorship and demonization rather than engaging with ideas. However, when Israel became the topic of discussion, these same figures immediately deployed the exact tactics they had spent years condemning.

Smith recalls being a Ron Paul supporter and watching Ben Shapiro accuse Paul of wanting to strangle Jews and being a vicious anti-semite simply for disagreeing on foreign policy. This revealed that for many in conservative media, all the talk about fiscal conservatism, constitutionalism, and traditional values was secondary to one issue: support for Israel and its wars. Anyone who questioned this, regardless of how aligned they were on other issues, became an enemy overnight.

The neoconservative movement itself began as a marriage between the Israeli lobby and the military-industrial complex. Many neocons were former communists who became Democrats, then Republicans when that served their interests, then supported Hillary Clinton over Trump because she was more committed to their foreign policy agenda. Their principles on social issues were always flexible, deployed strategically to build political coalitions for their wars.

Market Forces Versus Manufactured Consensus

A major theme of the conversation is the tension between what audiences actually want and what establishment gatekeepers try to impose. Owens becoming the number one podcast globally, despite every attempt to cancel her, demonstrates that the free market response contradicts the manufactured consensus. Similarly, Tucker Carlson's audience grew massively after being fired from Fox News.

The establishment's strategy has always been to artificially exclude dissenting voices, then claim victory in a rigged marketplace. They want to deplatform competitors and control the flow of information so they can claim to be number one. But when audiences have genuine choice, they consistently choose voices willing to speak uncomfortable truths over those who toe the party line.

This dynamic played out during Trump's potential escalation with Iran, when figures like Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and others opposed military action. This was unprecedented - it would have been like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh turning against George W. Bush's wars. Kirk in particular, as someone deeply embedded in Republican youth organizing and Trump support, carried enormous weight. His opposition helped prevent a war with Iran despite massive pressure from Netanyahu and others.

Trump's Betrayal and the Epstein Cover-Up

Both Smith and Owens identify Trump's dismissal of the Epstein client list as a critical turning point that degraded enthusiasm among his base. Trump's entire political brand was built on draining the swamp. A pedophile ring connected to government officials and foreign intelligence agencies represents the absolute depths of swamp corruption. When Trump responded with "Epstein who?" and moved to protect rather than expose this network, he betrayed his core mission.

This moment fractured MAGA more than any debate or controversy. People who had been loyal to Trump specifically because they believed he would take on the corrupt establishment suddenly saw him protecting the most corrupt elements of that establishment. While polls might not fully capture this shift, the energy, enthusiasm, and loyalty were dramatically reduced.

The appointment of Pam Bondi, who refuses to address Epstein questions while aggressively going after college students who support Palestine, exemplifies the administration's priorities. When Kash Patel is blocked from allowing Tulsi Gabbard's team to investigate whether foreign actors were involved in Kirk's assassination, it becomes clear that certain topics are off-limits regardless of how much they matter to the base.

The Future of Conservative Politics

Owens makes clear that her loyalty is to God, her family, and her friends - not to any political administration. Politicians are public servants who work for the people, not the other way around. The expectation that she should mobilize her audience to support candidates who have covered up crimes, blocked investigations, and prioritized foreign interests over American interests is absurd.

She draws a clear line: she supported and worked to elect people who promised to do certain things. When they not only failed to do those things but actively worked against them, the contract is broken. She's not going to use her platform to get out the vote for people who respond to Netanyahu's demands for bombers to attack Iran, who participate in covering up the Epstein network, or who prioritize the interests of a foreign government over Americans.

The conservative movement is at a crossroads. The old model where establishment gatekeepers could control the narrative and punish dissent is breaking down. Figures like Owens and Tucker Carlson have demonstrated that there's a massive audience hungry for people willing to tell the truth even when it's uncomfortable or goes against powerful interests. Meanwhile, legacy conservative media figures who revealed their true priorities are losing credibility and audience.

The Spiritual Dimension

Throughout the conversation, Owens emphasizes the spiritual aspect of these battles. She describes the pressure campaign against her and Kirk as having a demonic quality - something beyond normal political disagreement. The willingness of people like Josh Hammer to lie about their friend's final words and state of mind reveals something spiritually wrong, not just politically corrupt.

A donor close to Kirk told Owens that "a soul in struggle will free itself, one way or another." Kirk's soul was struggling with the pressure to compromise his principles for donor money and political access. In his final days, he chose to free himself by rejecting their demands, telling them to keep their money, and platforming voices they wanted silenced. Whatever the circumstances of his death, he died as a free man with his integrity intact.

This spiritual clarity allowed Owens to survive her own cancellation attempt. Rather than cave to pressure, she committed to truth regardless of the personal cost. She was willing to lose access to Republican stages, invitations to Mar-a-Lago, and major funding rather than cheer for the killing of children or abandon her principles. That commitment has now been rewarded with the largest podcast audience in the world.

What Happens Next

Owens continues investigating the circumstances around Kirk's death and the financial operations of Turning Point USA. She's learned how much money various individuals at the organization stood to gain from the deal Netanyahu offered that Kirk rejected, establishing clear financial motives. She's committed to cutting the grass to find the snakes in the garden, refusing to simply accept that Erica Kirk can overnight become chairman and CEO of a hundred-million-dollar organization without significant behind-the-scenes operators.

The broader question is whether the Republican Party and conservative movement will adapt to the new reality or cling to the old model. Younger conservatives overwhelmingly oppose current Israel policy. The most popular conservative voices are those willing to criticize rather than blindly support the establishment. There's a genuine populist movement happening on both left and right that rejects the old gatekeepers.

Those trying to enforce the old order through cancellation, funding pressure, and narrative control are finding their tactics increasingly ineffective. You can't cancel someone from being the number one podcast. You can't manufacture consent when audiences have direct access to alternative voices. The free market, when actually allowed to operate, consistently rewards authenticity and truth-telling over carefully managed establishment messaging.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!