Erin Molan and Gad Saad Expose Candace Owens Israel Conspiracy Theory After Charlie Kirk Assassination

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

The Troubling Questions Surrounding Charlie Kirk's Assassination That Nobody Wants You To Ask

The Troubling Questions Surrounding Charlie Kirk's Assassination That Nobody Wants You To Ask

1:06:51

Candace Owens Breaks Internet With Hunter Biden Interview and Questions Erika Kirk CEO Video Authenticity

Candace Owens Breaks Internet With Hunter Biden Interview and Questions Erika Kirk CEO Video Authenticity

51:07

Debunking the Wild Conspiracy Theories Surrounding Charlie Kirk's Assassination and What the Evidence Actually Shows

Debunking the Wild Conspiracy Theories Surrounding Charlie Kirk's Assassination and What the Evidence Actually Shows

38:00

Erin Molan and Gad Saad Expose Candace Owens Israel Conspiracy Theory After Charlie Kirk Assassination

Erin Molan sits down with Professor Gad Saad to discuss the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination, the disturbing celebration of his death by extremists, and Candace Owens' dangerous conspiracy theories blaming Israel and Jews for the tragedy. Saad, a close friend of Kirk, explains the concept of "six degrees of Jew" and how parasitic ideologies threaten Western civilization. They analyze the FBI text messages from the alleged killer, discuss who could possibly fill Kirk's irreplaceable role, debate the false equivalence of political violence, and examine the state of leadership under Trump's second term. Saad pulls no punches in calling out those spreading defamatory lies while families grieve.

September 17, 2025

The Devastating Loss of Charlie Kirk and the Toxic Celebration

The conversation opens with Erin Molan and her guest Tarly Shine processing the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk and the equally disturbing reactions that followed. Text messages released by the FBI from the alleged killer to his transgender partner reveal the premeditated nature of the crime. The killer wrote: "Drop what you're doing. Look under the keyboard... I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orum for a while. I got to grab my rifle. To be honest, I'd hope to keep this secret till I died of old age. I'm sorry to involve you."

What makes this tragedy even more painful is the split reaction from the public. While countless people worldwide expressed genuine grief over the loss of a positive voice who engaged in meaningful dialogue, segments of the extreme left openly celebrated Kirk's death. Mullen points out that these are the same individuals who celebrated October 7th, demonstrating a pattern of celebrating violence that contradicts their claims of preaching kindness and tolerance.

One silver lining emerged from this darkness: moderate leftists began distancing themselves from the radical extremists who celebrated Kirk's murder. This created an opportunity for more Americans to move toward the center and find common ground, recognizing that political disagreement should never justify violence or celebration of death.

The Dangerous Israel Conspiracy Theories

Perhaps the most disturbing development following Kirk's assassination has been the spread of conspiracy theories attempting to blame Israel, Jewish donors, and specifically businessman Bill Ackman for Kirk's death. Candace Owens has been at the forefront of promoting these theories, despite clear evidence from the FBI investigation pointing to a left-wing extremist as the perpetrator.

Mullen expresses disgust at these baseless accusations, particularly considering that Kirk's entire career was built on robust debate and dialogue. Kirk welcomed strong arguments from all sides, including from supporters of Israel who would naturally engage with him on Middle East policy. To twist these normal professional interactions into some sinister conspiracy is not only intellectually dishonest but dangerous.

Kirk's executive producer publicly stated that Owens' claims are not true, joining seven other individuals who provided evidence contradicting her narrative. Yet Owens persists, claiming only Kirk's widow Erika Kirk could make her stop—a particularly cruel statement given that Erika is trying to explain to her children why their father isn't coming home.

Professor Gad Saad on the Irreplaceable Charlie Kirk

Professor Gad Saad, a visiting scholar at the Declaration of Independence Center for the Study of American Freedom at the University of Mississippi and a close personal friend of Kirk, joined Mullen for an extensive interview. Saad described floating on "a dark cloud of rage" upon learning of Kirk's death and receiving hundreds of emails from strangers across the globe, including from Malawi, all grieving the loss of someone they saw as a positive force.

When asked who could fill Kirk's unique role, Saad was clear: "He's really irreplaceable in the sense that he had a combination of skills. Many people have one, two, three of those skills, but not all of them." Saad outlined what made Kirk special: he was approachable, humble, willing to put himself out there, punchy but always with a warm smile, and uniquely able to connect with the TikTok generation. Saad shared that his 16-year-old daughter, who had never asked to meet any of the famous people her father spoke with, specifically requested an introduction to Charlie Kirk.

Six Degrees of Jew: Deconstructing Candace Owens' Parasitic Thinking

Saad didn't mince words when discussing Candace Owens, expressing regret for having her on his show years ago when she was a lesser-known figure. He introduced the concept of "six degrees of Jew," a satirical game he coined based on "six degrees of separation" or "six degrees of Kevin Bacon." The game works by taking any calamity and connecting it back to Jews in six or fewer causal steps.

"Much of Candace's brain has been taken up by six degrees of Jew," Saad explained. He noted that even when presented with FBI evidence clearly showing the killer's left-wing extremist motivations through released text messages, conspiracy theorists refuse to accept reality. Saad pointed out that Bill Ackman has denied the accusations against him, and there's no doubt he's telling the truth. Moreover, the idea that people would approach Kirk with strong positions on Israel shouldn't surprise anyone—that was literally Kirk's job and what he welcomed.

Deontological vs. Consequentialist Ethics and Freedom of Speech

Saad provided a masterclass in philosophical thinking by explaining the crucial difference between deontological and consequentialist ethics. Deontological ethics involve absolute statements, such as "it is never okay to lie." Consequentialist ethics involve situational judgments, such as "it is okay to lie to spare someone's feelings."

While consequentialist thinking makes sense in many life situations—Saad humorously advises applying it when your spouse asks "Do I look fat in this dress?"—it becomes dangerous when applied to foundational principles. Freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, and presumption of innocence must be deontological by definition. "When you say yes, I believe in freedom of speech, and then you put the qualifier 'but,' you're sinking into consequentialism, you shouldn't," Saad warned.

This framework traces back to deconstructionism, pioneered by French philosopher Jacques Derrida, which argues that language creates reality. This ideology leads to the absurd conclusion that speech you disagree with constitutes violence against you, justifying censorship and even physical retaliation.

The False Equivalence of Political Violence

Mullen pressed Saad on the "both sides" narrative that Democrats and the left push regarding political violence. While acknowledging he doesn't have comprehensive empirical data, Saad stated that based on observation and reasoning, violence is "much more likely to be on the left because they're the ones who have internalized that consequentialist ethos."

He pointed to the burning of neighborhoods after George Floyd's death—a "hardened felon" who nevertheless became justification for widespread destruction. By contrast, when "a genuinely beautiful gem of a human being got blown away, Charlie Kirk," there were no violent protests from the right.

Saad explained that finding a singular example of right-wing violence doesn't make the phenomenon equally distributed, using a brilliant analogy: "Men are taller and heavier than women even though your aunt Linda is taller than your uncle Rosco. When you tell me that, professor, it's not true because Aunt Linda, you're simply advertising that you're a fool who doesn't understand statistical distribution." Nearly every WNBA player is taller than most men, yet the statement that men are taller than women remains absolutely true.

Qatar's Role in Harboring Terrorism

The discussion shifted to Qatar's recent demand that the world punish Israel for strikes on Qatari land. Mullen and Shine questioned why the international community doesn't instead punish Qatar for harboring terrorists. Qatar has been the second-biggest state sponsor of Hamas after Iran, welcoming Hamas leaders to stay on Qatari land after October 7th, allowing them to keep billions of dollars stolen from international aid meant for Gaza's people.

Qatar could have demanded hostage releases, expelled the terrorists, or redirected stolen funds to their intended purpose. Instead, Qatari officials attended state funerals for recognized terror leaders while Western voices claimed Israel killed "negotiators" by eliminating Hamas leadership. Secretary of State Marco Rubio made clear during his visit to Israel that there never should have been hostages, this should never have happened, and the only way forward is to end Hamas and release the hostages—"deceased and living," he said, heartbreakingly emphasizing "deceased" multiple times.

When a reporter asked Prime Minister Netanyahu if he could guarantee Israel wouldn't strike another nation again, he simply said "No." The message was clear: don't harbor terrorists.

The Path Forward: Parasitic Mind Plus Suicidal Empathy

Saad outlined his theory for understanding the West's current crisis, drawn from his work including his forthcoming book "Suicidal Empathy." The equation is: parasitic mind plus suicidal empathy equals catastrophe. Islam may contain tenets incongruent with Western values, but it only becomes an existential problem when Westerners are parasitized by cultural relativism that says "who are we to judge the norms of another culture?"

This combines with suicidal empathy—the idea that demonstrating you're not bigoted requires letting in millions of people who don't share your values. "The combination of having a parasitized mind and a parasitized emotional system results in the hijacking of your survival instinct and then it results in the death of the West," Saad explained. This pattern is visible in Australia, Sweden, Britain, and France.

When asked about Tommy Robinson's recent show of force in Britain, Saad expressed hope but emphasized that moral indignation must happen "in every nook and cranny of every interaction." It's not enough to dedicate one day to resistance—every single interaction where parasitic ideas spread needs to become "an inoculation center."

Trump's Second Term and Future Leadership

Saad gave Trump's second term a grade between A and A+, praising his efforts on crime, border security, and foreign diplomacy. More significantly, Saad believes Trump has "grown into his role in the second term." His theory: "The first term, he was pissed off. People are coming after me. Nobody is giving me credit and so on. Well, now he's ascended to the mountain. Now he has won all that he has to win. Now he has lifted the World Cup and so that stress is off his shoulder."

Even on the metric where Trump scored poorly in his first term—being presidential—Saad believes he's vastly improved. As for Trump's successor, Saad gives the edge to JD Vance over Marco Rubio, though both would safeguard the MAGA agenda. Vance has "that extra little something"—he's punchy like Kirk was, "a honey badger, but pleasant to look at."

When asked to identify the weakest current world leader, Saad couldn't resist mentioning former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, referencing a memorable exchange with Megyn Kelly who said Trudeau "is not a guy who can get on top of you and get the job done in the bedroom." Among current leaders, Saad ranked British Prime Minister Keir Starmer as "the king of the cast" of weak leaders, though Canada's Mark Carney "does not exactly exude the model of masculinity" either.

Melania Trump's Dignity and Legal Victories

The show also covered First Lady Melania Trump's recent legal victories. Unlike trivial matters such as fashion magazine coverage, which she can laugh off, Melania takes decisive action when her integrity and dignity are attacked—particularly when it affects how her son sees her. She's already secured wins against the Daily Mail, with the Daily Beast retracting their claims. Notably absent from apologizing: Hunter Biden, who told defamatory lies about her.

Mullen pointed out the irony of an interview being called "the return of Hunter Biden," asking: "Where's he returning from? Is it a strip joint, rehab, or court where he's being forced to pay child support for his own child?" The answer, she concluded, is "all of the above." The contrast between Melania's dignity and Hunter's track record couldn't be more stark.

Kash Patel Refuses to Give Senators Their Soundbite

The show concluded with footage of FBI Director Kash Patel refusing to play the Senate Democrats' game during a hearing. When a senator repeatedly tried to get Patel to admit that FBI field offices had lost personnel, seeking a soundbite for fundraising and media hits, Patel refused to cooperate. He pointed out that field offices across the country, including Hawaii, had received increases in FBI agents.

When the senator persisted, Patel fired back: "When you're talking about firings, you're looking for a media hit and a fundraising clip. And I'm not going to give it to you." He went further, calling the senator "the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate" and "a disgrace to this institution and an utter coward," noting the senator's role in Russia gate and January 6th narratives. Patel emphasized that he's provided 33,000 pages of information and challenged the senator to "say anything credibly to the truth."

Mullen celebrated this exchange as evidence that Republicans have finally learned not to play the Democrats' game. These hearings aren't about uncovering truth or exposing lies—they're entertainment shows designed to generate 10-second soundbites for CNN and MSNBC. By refusing to cooperate, Republicans can focus on getting things done rather than being distracted by political theater.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!