Up Next

Dr. Chris Martinson Reveals Why Tyler Robinson Could Not Have Fired the Fatal Shot That Killed Charlie Kirk

Dr. Chris Martinson Reveals Why Tyler Robinson Could Not Have Fired the Fatal Shot That Killed Charlie Kirk

1:09:53

Baron Coleman Uncovers Disturbing Google Trends Pattern Before Charlie Kirk Assassination in Orem Utah

Baron Coleman Uncovers Disturbing Google Trends Pattern Before Charlie Kirk Assassination in Orem Utah

2:03:23

Camron Vance Exposes FBI Narrative on Charlie Kirk Assassination Attempt with Field Test Recreation

Camron Vance Exposes FBI Narrative on Charlie Kirk Assassination Attempt with Field Test Recreation

13:50

Henry Dells Witnessed Charlie Kirk's Final Moments Just 15 Feet Away at Utah Valley University

Categories: Investigation
October 18, 2025

Henry Dells, a construction worker and LDS member from Texas, stood just feet from Charlie Kirk when tragedy struck at Utah Valley University on September 10th. In this detailed account, Henry describes the tense atmosphere before the event, his religious debate with Charlie moments before the shooting, and what he witnessed in those chaotic seconds when the shot rang out. From hearing protesters cheer after Charlie was hit to dealing with FBI interviews and conspiracy theories, Henry shares his firsthand perspective on one of the most significant political events in recent history. This conversation explores security failures, acoustic anomalies, and the disturbing coincidences surrounding George Zinn and Hunter Kozak that continue to raise questions about what really happened that day.

Introduction and Background

Henry Dells, originally from East Texas, never imagined his move to Utah would place him at the center of a national tragedy. A country boy who grew up hunting and fishing, Henry runs a construction abatement company that brought him to Utah just six to seven months before the events of September 10th. An atheist for most of his life, Henry converted to the LDS church at age 21 after a near-death experience in a car accident shifted his worldview. His interest in political and religious debate, influenced heavily by Charlie Kirk, led him to clear his schedule when he heard Charlie would be speaking at Utah Valley University.

Henry's friend who was part of the TPUSA chapter at UVU let him know about the debate, and he was excited to test his debate skills against someone he admired. Little did he know that his decision to attend that day would make him one of the closest eyewitnesses to Charlie Kirk's final moments.

The Growing LGBTQ Movement in Utah

When discussing the atmosphere in Utah, Henry noted a significant shift in the state's political and social landscape. While Utah maintains its reputation as a conservative, religious state with clean cities and friendly people, the LGBTQ movement has been growing substantially, particularly in the past few years. Salt Lake City, like most major urban centers, has become very blue and progressive. Henry recalled that when he first visited Utah years ago while dating a girl in Logan, the presence of pride flags and LGBTQ activism was minimal compared to what he witnessed upon moving there. The movement's growth coincided roughly with the COVID period, transforming Salt Lake into a very different place than the Utah of old.

Arriving at the Event: Tension in the Air

Henry arrived at UVU excited but quickly sensed something was off. Walking down the liberal arts building toward the amphitheater where Charlie would speak, the tension was palpable. People were already discussing Charlie Kirk's arrival, with some clearly affiliated with certain ideological groups calling him a racist, homophobic fascist who wasn't for freedom of speech. The irony wasn't lost on Henry—these same people were protesting someone literally offering them a microphone to express their beliefs.

What struck Henry most was the complete lack of security. He was just a regular construction worker coming off the street, walking through the hallways, and nobody was checking if people were students or had any right to be there. There was no security presence, no one prepping for the rally despite Charlie Kirk's prominence. This disbelief at the lack of preparation would prove tragically prescient.

George Zinn: An Ominous Presence

About an hour before the event started, before the crowd grew large, Henry encountered George Zinn—a figure who would later play a controversial role in the aftermath of the shooting. Zinn was going around trying to stir up trouble with TPUSA volunteers and people wearing MAGA hats. He was pressing the point that Charlie Kirk was a terrible person with harmful ideologies, and that if anything harmful happened to him, it's what any conservative deserves because they have hateful and harmful speech.

This encounter made Henry uneasy. The time window was narrowing before Charlie's arrival, everyone was streaming into the amphitheater, and Henry still hadn't seen any security or anyone being checked. There were tons of backpacks, tons of roofs with sightlines to the amphitheater, and besides one cop on what appeared to be a second story layer, Henry saw no security presence. They all showed up when Charlie showed up. Nothing was being checked.

Henry later learned that Zinn has a strange history of appearing at significant events—911, a marathon bombing in Utah, and he was even featured in a documentary about 911, though his actual presence at some events remains disputed. Zinn is also very active in Utah politics, not as a Democrat but as a peculiar agitator who seems to show up at political events to stir contention regardless of whether they're conservative or liberal.

The Religious Debate with Charlie Kirk

Initially, Henry planned to ask Charlie a political question about immigration and visa renewals for construction workers. However, about 10-15 minutes before the event started, he got an impression to change his question. He texted his friend Chandler that he wanted to ask Charlie about religion instead. Henry had recently watched a video of Charlie and Michael Knowles having a dialogue about their different religious perspectives, and he wanted a similar conversation.

As someone who had studied extensively from pre-exilic Judaism through second temple Judaism to early Christianity, Henry told Charlie he believed Mormonism was more historically accurate regarding the theological concepts of that time period than Protestantism. At the end of his question, remembering this was a "prove me wrong" booth, Henry said, "prove me wrong."

Charlie laughed and began by praising the LDS community, the church, and its members. He talked about how many people who work for TPUSA are Mormons and reflected on his positive relationships with LDS members. It was a respectful exchange. Then, as Henry noted, Charlie completely ignored the theological question and shifted to archaeological evidence instead. Henry thought to himself, "Okay, Charlie, let's shift the goalpost. Why don't you go straight into archaeological evidence even though I asked you a theological question?"

Henry plans to address Charlie's response on his religious page once things settle down, out of respect for Charlie. He posts a lot of historical religious content and feels he needs to correct what Charlie said, but he wants to let the situation die down first.

How Henry Got to Ask the First Question

Henry's question got priority through one of the TPUSA chapter heads at UVU. She was going around asking people what questions they had and liked Henry's question a lot. She took it to Charlie's manager, who okayed it to go first, and they put Henry at the front of the line. The questions weren't heavily screened—the woman seemed to go off what she thought would be interesting to kick off the event with. Most people were asking the same recycled questions Charlie had confronted before at college events—why do you hate gay people, why do you hate trans people, why are you racist, questions about DEI and the Civil Rights Act.

Henry's religious question was different and timely, as Charlie had been engaging more in religious dialogues lately. Being in Utah with a Mormon asking the question added to the appeal. It made sense they'd want something fresh to start with.

The Moment of the Shooting

After his exchange with Charlie, Henry moved off to the side, to Charlie's left, the right side of the stage. He stood about 15-20 feet from Charlie, just to the left of a PVC pipe. Hunter Kozak came up to ask his question. Henry was trying to get out because it was so crowded—they hadn't created a pathway for speakers to exit, and the crowd was pressed shoulder-to-shoulder against the gate with no room to move.

While looking in Charlie's direction and giving his name and information to a Deseret News reporter for a paper they were publishing, Henry heard the shot. In person, it didn't sound like what the audio recordings make it sound like. When you listen to the audio, it clearly sounds like a gunshot, making people wonder how anyone could mistake it for a firecracker. But in person, it sounded exactly like a firecracker. You can see in the crowd footage that people were confused at first. They didn't realize it was a gunshot until they saw Charlie.

After a few seconds, Henry looked up and saw Charlie leaning over with blood pouring from his neck. It was terrible—something he wouldn't wish for anyone to see in person. He crouched slightly and started scanning the roofs in the direction he heard the gunshot come from. He didn't see anyone, though he looked pretty close and hard. From other footage, it's clear that shortly after the shot was taken, the shooter had already fled.

Henry kept scanning, listening to see if more gunshots would go off. He didn't hear anything. People were trying to get down because no one could get out due to the crowding. Not wanting to jump and suffocate people, Henry jumped into the little fountain area in the amphitheater, got soaked, waited for a pathway to clear, then jumped over the rail and exited toward the front where the fountains are.

The Direction of the Shot

Henry perceived the shot to come from directly in front of where Charlie was facing, toward the back where the Losee Building is or anywhere to the left of it—possibly on that building straight behind the waterfall or on the backside over to the left. There's footage of people standing on the upper level where Henry later gave his interview, and when the shot went off, they looked off to their right as if it came from that direction as well, which helped validate Henry's perception.

Henry felt people were gaslighting him when they tried to say the shot came from the crowd. He believes people were probably just in too much shock to really retain accurate information from those moments. The acoustics of that entire area are extremely unusual—sound bounces off everything in weird ways. Additionally, the gun's audio was redirected through Charlie's microphone and back through the PA system, adding another layer of acoustic confusion.

Questions About the Caliber

One thing Henry was certain about: it didn't sound like a 30-caliber round. He's shot hunting rifles his whole life, including the 30-06, and those produce a much deeper, louder sound rather than a higher-pitched crack. When he heard it was supposedly a 30-06, his mind immediately went to how Charlie could even have a neck left. The discussion about ballistics and possible explanations helped make it more plausible as a possibility, but initially, it seemed inconsistent with what he knew about that caliber.

The Disturbing Aftermath

While Henry was crouching and waiting to get out, he heard people on the upper levels talking. He looked up and heard them saying, "Oh, Charlie got shot." He saw some of them give each other high fives. Some ran away, too scared. There were people cheering. One person said, "Oh, that was a good shot."

This tipped Henry off badly. He wanted to go to authorities and tell them they needed to question those people because they instantly started cheering after it happened. If they're trying to find motive and people are cheering the assassination of Charlie Kirk, they should be questioned. It disgusted Henry and showed him just how evil elements of the left can be. While he doesn't want to put all leftists in that box because some are good people, seeing people celebrate someone getting shot who was trying to give them a voice was deeply hypocritical.

Police Response and Aftermath

After exiting through the tunnel area by the little ponds, Henry and others ran to some thin trees planted outside. Knowing that law enforcement would want testimonies from people at the front, they huddled around those trees and waited. When authorities arrived, they took everyone into the building adjacent to the amphitheater to the right—the building that connects via hallway right into that area.

Authorities took information and statements from people. At that time, most people didn't know Charlie's condition. Henry, being only 15 feet away, had already assumed by the time Charlie hit the floor that he was dead based on what he saw. When people tried to say Charlie was shot in the chest, Henry knew that was wrong—he was 15 feet away and saw everything clearly. Even when reports came that Charlie had a pulse or showed signs of life, Henry believed that even if that were somehow true, there would probably be no consciousness there.

The police response took about 10 minutes. Two cops out of about six stayed at the scene. A few rushed off and escorted the vehicle with Charlie to Timpanogos Hospital. They were pretty close, and helicopters arrived quickly, but by the time they took Charlie out and started heading to the hospital, some time had already passed. Around 10 minutes after the shooting, medical personnel and security detail started showing up in large numbers.

FBI Interviews

Henry sat down with the FBI for a few days and they called him multiple times after the event. They asked if he had any additional footage beyond what he'd already posted on his social media pages, which had been picked up and used by various media outlets. Henry told them he didn't have any additional footage. Interestingly, they never asked him to testify, which Henry now finds strange considering he was there early, had been gauging the environment by asking people how they felt about Charlie Kirk coming, and witnessed the shooting from 15 feet away.

Security Assessment

Henry firmly believes Charlie's security team was completely loyal and did everything they could. He spoke with Alex, a former UFC fighter on the security detail, and found him to be sincere and dedicated to Charlie. Many of Charlie's security detail had been with him for years and loved him—Henry can't see any motive for betrayal.

Conspiracy theories about Charlie's photographer Andrew, his videographers, or his Christian mentor and pastor Frank Turek being involved are absolutely ridiculous to Henry. People claiming Frank Turek touching his hat was signaling the shooter is absurd. Henry believes the security team was very sincere about protecting Charlie from what they could protect him from—anyone trying to come up to him or any near-distance threats.

The security team likely couldn't protect against a distant sniper, especially when UVU denied them roof coverage and drone surveillance. Henry doesn't understand why UVU thinks they have authority over airspace when they don't. If the security team was worried for Charlie and knew the law about airspace, they should have flown the drone anyway regardless of what UVU said. In retrospect, they should have known UVU couldn't tell them not to fly a drone over their airspace to double-check the roofs.

The George Zinn Diversion

After the shot went off and Charlie was hit, George Zinn made a ruckus that diverted all attention to him. Zinn started screaming from the crowd, saying "I did it" and "take me" or "shoot me," which caused law enforcement to focus their attention on the supposed closer threat rather than where the gunshot came from. This is just common sense—you take care of the closer threat first.

This diversion allowed whoever was on the roof to escape. It took 33 hours for authorities to supposedly figure out who the shooter was. Henry thought the whole sequence of events was very suspicious—the tensions he felt leading up to the event, how George Zinn acted beforehand and took credit afterward, and the sequence of how Hunter Kozak asked his questions when Charlie got shot. Henry initially wondered if George Zinn was a decoy or tied in with the shooter, though he's careful not to say anything definitively until the investigation is complete.

The Hunter Kozak Situation

Hunter Kozak, the person asking Charlie a question when he was shot, later got angry at Henry for giving interviews about his suspicions. Kozak tried to blame Henry for him being questioned by the FBI. Henry found this hilarious—Kozak was going to be questioned by the FBI regardless of what Henry said in interviews because of what Kozak himself said and his position at the moment of the shooting.

Within a day or two, Kozak's name was public knowledge. The whole situation with both Kozak and Zinn involves a lot of weird coincidences that can be added to any conspiracy theory about who shot Charlie or what happened. Henry has heard that Kozak was affiliated with some radical left group that Destiny oversees or is connected to—the same Destiny who praised the killing of the firefighter at Butler and shows no remorse toward Charlie Kirk, even suggesting the world is a better place without him. While Henry won't state this definitively until it's fact-checked, videos supposedly showing this connection have circulated widely.

There's also supposedly video of Kozak practicing his reaction before the event happened, though Henry hadn't seen it yet at the time of this interview. All of these elements only add to the conspiracy and make people think there's more to the story.

Lessons and Reforms Needed

When Congressman Kennedy invited Henry over to his house to get his opinion on preventing future incidents, Henry's advice was simple and what he considers common sense: Don't deny drones. Don't deny checking roofs. These should be standard security measures.

Henry believes UVU will be in the spotlight forever after this event, and there will likely be significant reforms. He also thinks TPUSA probably has a good lawsuit against UVU if they choose to pursue it. UVU denied them the ability to fly drones, which they didn't have the authority to do since they don't own their airspace, and they didn't follow through on sufficient roof coverage.

The tension between following university rules to maintain good relationships for future events versus taking security measures that might violate those rules is real. TPUSA was trying to be a good partner so they could return in the future, as universities can deny access or make it harder to come back. In retrospect, it's easy to say security should have been more aggressive, but at the time, they were balancing multiple concerns while likely taking UVU at their word that they would provide adequate roof coverage.

Charlie's Character and Choices

Many have questioned why Charlie went ahead with the event given the security concerns. The reality is that it was ultimately Charlie's decision. None of us know what conversations happened in the background prior to the event. Charlie was well aware of the risks. He could have used bulletproof glass or taken other precautions. The speculation is that even if someone had told Charlie definitively that he would be shot the next day and needed bulletproof glass, he would have been very resistant to do so.

Charlie was known for interacting with the crowd. Turning events into super highly secure affairs with bulletproof glass would change the entire nature of what he was trying to accomplish. The suspicion is that many of Charlie's decisions about security—not just at this event but probably at many in the past—went against advice his security team gave him. He likely decided to face whatever was coming if he felt this was his mission in life and what he was supposed to be doing. That's what men do. Whatever was going to happen was going to happen, and Charlie wasn't going to let fear stop him from his mission.

The Ongoing Investigation

The acoustic anomalies, the coincidences surrounding George Zinn and Hunter Kozak, the security failures, and the 33 hours it took to identify the shooter all raise questions that hopefully the FBI is investigating thoroughly. The fact that protesters were on roofs and upper levels surrounding the amphitheater, that George Zinn was making provocative statements before the event and then created a diversion immediately after, and that Hunter Kozak was asking his question at the exact moment of the shooting—these are all elements that cannot be ignored regardless of what theory anyone holds about what happened.

Henry's perspective from 15 feet away, combined with his observations before, during, and after the event, provides crucial eyewitness testimony to one of the most significant political events in recent history. His willingness to speak openly about what he saw, what he heard, and what he suspects—while being careful to distinguish between what he knows and what he's speculating about—offers important insights into the tragedy that took Charlie Kirk's life.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!